Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-06-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:59:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
  and he will try to harm any other people is someone tell him that it
  helps USA.  His approach is completely nationalistic. You cannot
  understand him and agree with him until he drops this attitude or
  until you adopt it.
 
   Considering I am an Indian, this is getting hilarious; the US
  is merely my country of adoption.

Actually, I am given to understand that many immigrants are more
passionate nationalists about their adopted country than native-born
folks are of their default country.  This makes sense when once
considers that many immigrants to a country have to make some sort of
sacrifice to get there and stay there, which makes them more likely to
seek justifications for their decision.  It's human nature; people are
passionate about their choice of automobile or computer for similar
reasons -- they represent a relatively large outlay of capital (or a
relatively large assumption of debt), and people are loath to
second-guess their decisions under such circumstances, lest they be
characterized as suckers.

Look at the example of Ayn Rand, for instance.

(Not saying you're a nationalist, Manoj.)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux   |  Please do not look directly into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  laser with remaining eye.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgpQh1kC61I4f.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-06-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:39:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
 Notice that the US governement never said that was their aim, they said
 Iraq was dangerous because they have mass destruction weapons and
 support terrorism, which has turned out to be blatant lie. The french
 governement opposed this, because they felt that the UNO investigators
 were enough to prove that Iraq had (or had not) mass destruction
 weapons.

(Sigh, hopelessly off-topic.)

My theory:
Britain and the U.S. wanted to invade Iraq so that oil contracts
more favorable to large petroleum companies that strongly
influence their governments could be written.

France and Russia wanted to preserve the status quo because
large petroleum companies that strongly influence their
governments already *had* very favorable oil contracts.

Yes, It Really Was All About Oil.  All this talk of principle,
self-determination, brutal dicators, and inspections was window-dressing
and a distraction from the real issues.  The only people who felt deeply
about it were the people who had no real power over the situation, like
protestors in the streets.

It was also a case of Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss.

Iraq was largely run by oil companies and will continue to be for the
forseeable future.  All that have or will change are the logos on the
employees' uniforms.

The Americans and the French aren't so different.  Just ask the Vietnamese.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|You can have my PGP passphrase when
Debian GNU/Linux   |you pry it from my cold, dead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |brain.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Adam Thornton


pgp8x5JugW9VL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-06-03 Thread Miles Bader
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 (Not saying you're a nationalist, Manoj.)

Even worse, you're comparing him to Ayn Rand!

-Miles
-- 
I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task.
   --Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-28 Thread Daniel O'Neill
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
  non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
  part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
  coming into the country.

 Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
 the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
 this way?

Me, for one.  I wouldn't touch American soil with a ten foot pole.  On the
other hand, Vancouver is an amazing city, I would go there in a heartbeat.

Regards,
--Daniel F. O'Neill




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-26 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:

  So let me get this straight.  Instead of a country where people are
  occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
  Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
  clear.) you would rather go to a place where the immigration policy
  consists of shooting people?

 And you do have proof of that claim, do you ? Or did you only gather
 that from a bunch of James Bond movies ?

 Friendly,

 Sven Luther


I could swear there are more examples but a very quick google search only
turned up this[1] from 1993.  Perhaps now things have changed and now you
only get shot for staying _in_ Cuba[2].


[1] http://www.fiu.edu/~fcf/us.rips.cruelty.html

[2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/cuba/story/0,11983,944925,00.html


-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-26 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 
 The West coast may be more expensive to get to for foreign visitors.
 But I like the other suggestion of Florida.  Lot's of cheap flights to
 there.

i live on the west coast (san diego, specifically), but if there was a
debconf held in southern florida (fort lauderdale, specifically) i would
do my damndest to get there.

-john, one of the rarest of breeds: a native floridian




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-26 Thread Miles Bader
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 this is entirely off topic for -devel, let's move it to -politics or
 -curiosa or somewhere else more appropriate.

But you just _had_ to get your bitter little rant in first, huh?

-Miles
-- 
Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-26 Thread Adam McKenna
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:03:38AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
 that north america contains not one, but three countries: Candada, USA,
 and Mexico

Candada?  Is that near Canadia?

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-26 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:05:02AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
 
   So let me get this straight.  Instead of a country where people are
   occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
   Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
   clear.) you would rather go to a place where the immigration policy
   consists of shooting people?
 
  And you do have proof of that claim, do you ? Or did you only gather
  that from a bunch of James Bond movies ?
 
  Friendly,
 
  Sven Luther
 
 
 I could swear there are more examples but a very quick google search only
 turned up this[1] from 1993.  Perhaps now things have changed and now you
 only get shot for staying _in_ Cuba[2].

No more than you get shot by living in the US. I know people who have
been in cuba, and they report no such things, and they also don't just
stayed in the hotels.

The articles you mention was about people dying when trying to leave
their country to emigrate to the US. It was an isolatedact, even the US
official cited in the article told this, and still, are you sure it was
so or is it just desinformation ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-26 Thread Geordie Birch
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
 
  PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
  Cuba than in US. Really.
 
 So let me get this straight.  Instead of a country where people are
 occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
 Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
 clear.) you would rather go to a place where the immigration policy
 consists of shooting people?

No need for innuendo :).

My sources are recent news reports of journalists covering a trade show 
who were jailed and removed from the country, in four cases out of six 
*after* they had been granted admission to the US.  This is of interest 
to someone organizing a similar conference in the US.  You'd at least 
want to warn journalists that they had best hire an immigration lawyer 
to ensure that their papers were in order.

My preferences for a location for a DebConf are Vancouver and Seattle.  
Cuba would be a nice place for a vacation.  I doubt I would be able to 
attend, although it would be a snap to organize a charter flight from 
Montreal or Toronto.

Geordie.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
 PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
 Cuba than in US. Really.

Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
could you ask for than a debconf on a beach?

-- 
Duncan Findlay

pgpeaqvWUV3fv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 24 May 2003 08:43:12 +1000 (EST), Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
said: 

 On Thu, 22 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
  On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
  You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
  U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel
  about the U.S. governments acts or positions?

  When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline
  industries suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of
  this then it'll keep the American economy down.

 I see. You all are personally taking action to make it harder for
 my friends and relatives to find a job, or get decent health care
 (my ex-boss has been looking for employment for 27 months now, and
 my step daughter does not have a job with benefits), and you expect
 me to have sympathy for your views?

 Do you have a better way of encougaging the U.S.A. to take an
 alternate stance?

Try by not blackmailing us.

 Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
 living.

Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
 country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.

manoj
-- 
Knowledge without common sense is folly.
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 23 May 2003 20:01:48 -0500, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Not at all. I know that if your economy suffers, mine suffers doubly
 so.  Mexico is so heavily dependent on the US economy that if you
 enter a mild recession we are in crisis... And it is not nice at
 all. 

The fact that you gladly embrace self flagellation changes my
 view of your actions not one whit, really.

manoj
-- 
To a New Yorker, all Californians are blond, even the blacks.  There
are, in fact, whole neighborhoods that are zoned only for blond
people.  The only way to tell the difference between California and
Sweden is that the Swedes speak better English. From East vs. West:
The War Between the Coasts
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:04:43AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
 On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
  PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
  Cuba than in US. Really.
 
 Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
 could you ask for than a debconf on a beach?

And it must be way cheaper too.

Friendly,

Sven Luther




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
  Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
  living.

   Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
  country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.

And what is US trying to do to France, right at the moment ?

-- 
I have sampled every language, french is my favorite. Fantastic language,
especially to curse with. Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de
saloperie de connard d'enculé de ta mère. It's like wiping your ass
with silk! I love it. -- The Merovingian, in the Matrix Reloaded




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Saturday 24 May 2003 00:43, Matthew Palmer wrote:
 * The rest of the world is sick to death of US imperialism;

 * The US government ignores world opinion and does it's thing;

 * The rest of the world puts pressure on the US people to change things,
 since they've at least got half a chance to make changes;

 * The US people make the change, or live with the consequences of not
 changing.

Considering this - http://www.newamericancentury.org/ , do you really think 
something can change before a government change in the US ? (hint: take a 
look at the names in the page Statement of Principles)
And considering how Bush was elected [1] [2], do you really think a real 
government change can happen ?

Mike

[1] 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060392452/ref=pd_gw_qpt_1//103-6886560-6531804?v=glance
[2] 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1573929727/qid=1053855921/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-6886560-6531804?v=glances=books


-- 
I have sampled every language, french is my favorite. Fantastic language,
especially to curse with. Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de
saloperie de connard d'enculé de ta mère. It's like wiping your ass
with silk! I love it. -- The Merovingian, in the Matrix Reloaded




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Mathieu Roy
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :

 On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
   Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
   living.
 
  Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
   country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.
 
 And what is US trying to do to France, right at the moment ?


I personally think that discussing about nations with Manoj here is a
complete waste of time.

He said that he would follow his leaders whatever they do, because
they are american. Isn't it clear? He will hate someone that try to
harm USA, without at any moment trying to guess why, and he will try
to harm any other people is someone tell him that it helps USA.
His approach is completely nationalistic. You cannot understand him
and agree with him until he drops this attitude or until you adopt
it.

Free software is fascinating: so many people so different contribute
to a same project... despite the fact that they think completely
differently on other issues. 




-- 
Mathieu Roy
 
  Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
  Not a native english speaker: 
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 25 May 2003 12:20:45 +0200, Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
 On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
   Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
   living.
 
 Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
   country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the
   consequences.

 And what is US trying to do to France, right at the moment ?


 I personally think that discussing about nations with Manoj here is
 a complete waste of time.

 He said that he would follow his leaders whatever they do, because
 they are american.

This is a lie, really, and bordering on slander.

I do not subscribeto My nation, right or wrong. Indeeed, I
 lean democrat rather than republican, and I like Gore; I consider the
 election of the current president a disaster that the american people
 have to endure and survive. 


 Isn't it clear? He will hate someone that try to harm USA,

Un;less your logic fails you, that is entirely different. The
 ends do not justify the means; and in any case if the means is
 punching me in the nose; you should expect vigorous defense. 

 without at any moment trying to guess why,

You punch my nose, I am not going to pat you on the back
 because your cause is just.  I think most people like to hide behind
 the cloak that they are not punching people in the face, and they are
 hurting an amophous economy. 

Economies are made of the blood, sweat and tears of real live
 people, and they are the hooks on which dreams are hung.  When you
 set out to deliberately hurt an economy, you are hurting men, women,
 and children, that live and die in that economic system,

 and he will try to harm any other people is someone tell him that it
 helps USA.  His approach is completely nationalistic. You cannot
 understand him and agree with him until he drops this attitude or
 until you adopt it.

Considering I am an Indian, this is getting hilarious; the US
 is merely my country of adoption.

You are missing the point by a mile. This is not nationalism --
 this is merely protection of ones own -- you are asking for common
 cause in trying to hurt people I know and love; and I am rejecting
 this common cause vehemently. 

Have you seen US developers try to raise common cause here to
 boycott French products and conferences in France (because of what
 some consider their silly stnace in removing a dictator from power)?
 No? How many of you would consider that unacceptable? Why is is it
 that is accetable to use this form as an attack platform against
 Americans? 

 Free software is fascinating: so many people so different contribute
 to a same project... despite the fact that they think completely
 differently on other issues.

Quite.

manoj

-- 
Katz' Law: Men and nations will act rationally when all other
possibilities have been exhausted.  History teaches us that men and
nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other
alternatives. Abba Eban
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:59:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
   Have you seen US developers try to raise common cause here to
  boycott French products and conferences in France (because of what
  some consider their silly stnace in removing a dictator from power)?
  No? How many of you would consider that unacceptable? Why is is it
  that is accetable to use this form as an attack platform against
  Americans? 

Notice that the US governement never said that was their aim, they said
Iraq was dangerous because they have mass destruction weapons and
support terrorism, which has turned out to be blatant lie. The french
governement opposed this, because they felt that the UNO investigators
were enough to prove that Iraq had (or had not) mass destruction
weapons. They also said that if the aim of the US would be to remove a
dictator from power, then this would be another discussion, and the
french stance would maybe have been different, but the US did no speak
of that.

Also, Manoj, you have not to be afraid of the US economy being hurt an
hurting your family since it will assuredly improve a lot in the next
time, with the irakian loot, err oil that is, and the markets attributed
to USian companies (who will pay for them anyway, i had the impression
that the US governement wanted for the UNO to provide the reconstruction
money which will line Bush's friend pocket in the end).

Anyway, i don't hear you protesting against the US governement actively
hurting economies the world over, exporting their depression with the
low dollar value, and so on. Maybe you are not so adverse of hurting
other people's family in order to protect yours ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Mathieu Roy
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :

 On 25 May 2003 12:20:45 +0200, Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 
 
  Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
  On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
living.
  
Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the
consequences.
 
  And what is US trying to do to France, right at the moment ?
 
  I personally think that discussing about nations with Manoj here is
  a complete waste of time.
 
  He said that he would follow his leaders whatever they do, because
  they are american.
 
   This is a lie, really, and bordering on slander.
 
   I do not subscribeto My nation, right or wrong. Indeeed, I
  lean democrat rather than republican, and I like Gore; I consider the
  election of the current president a disaster that the american people
  have to endure and survive. 
 
  Isn't it clear? He will hate someone that try to harm USA,
 
   Un;less your logic fails you, that is entirely different. The
  ends do not justify the means;

I'm glad to read that. I'm glad of to see that I was wrong about you
but what you previously wrote lead, IMHO, to this kind of confusion.

For instance you wrote:

  _You_ may live in a country where you may be ashamed to defend
 your friends and loved ones, but I do not. I do, however, pity you:
 If you think that when people express a desire to hurt your
 relatives, you need to feel ashamed if you raise a voice in protest,
 you really should get the heck out of your country.

Which means basically that you'll support any action of your
government if it implies an aggressive reaction. If your country drop
a H-Bomb on Paris, the fight back will be the expression of a desire
to hurt your relatives to stop your government. And supporting your
government in this perspective is clearly a nationalistic approach.

While naturally we care more about our friends and family than to other
people, while there is no shame to defend your friends and loved ones,
it can be a shame if your defense constitute an oppression. To
say it more clearly, Ben Laden dropped an airplane on innocent
people. But if he got so many people happy to die for him, it's also
because the people from where he comes from is very poor (the people,
not the country) and think they are defending their friend and loved
one. 

The difference between aggression and defense is frequently
questionable. For instance, if you read Tite-Live (Roman nationalist
from I BC / I AC) you'll read him explaining that the Roman empire was
only a defense, not an aggression in any way.

While I do not think that boycott is often a good choice -it does not
change things frequently-, you have to accept that as a personal choice
(not helping a country leads by people doing things you despise), not
as an aggression on your friends and beloved ones.

  and in any case if the means is punching me in the nose; you should
  expect vigorous defense.

As I said, people are not punching you in the nose but saying 'I do
not like this policy, I cannot contribute'. I personally buy the less
as possible products manufactured by companies known to rape human
rights. By doing that, I'm not trying to harm W**t D*sn** employees
but trying to avoid contributing to harm done in China.


  without at any moment trying to guess why,
 
   You punch my nose, I am not going to pat you on the back
  because your cause is just.  I think most people like to hide behind
  the cloak that they are not punching people in the face, and they are
  hurting an amophous economy. 
 
   Economies are made of the blood, sweat and tears of real live
  people, and they are the hooks on which dreams are hung.  When you
  set out to deliberately hurt an economy, you are hurting men, women,
  and children, that live and die in that economic system,

It happened that employees gone on strike to earn some respect and
money to get a decent life. It was breaking an economy made on their
blood and tears, on their very real life.
While breaking economy finally harm people, considering economy before
humans definitely harm people much more.

  and he will try to harm any other people is someone tell him that
  it helps USA.  His approach is completely nationalistic. You
  cannot understand him and agree with him until he drops this
  attitude or until you adopt it.
 
   Considering I am an Indian, this is getting hilarious; the US
  is merely my country of adoption.

Yes. And you would not find any romans (400-50 BC) more conservative
than most homo novus (members of the senate we do not have any father
already senator ; very rare, as in any other oligarchy). Adoption
sometimes push people to be more royalist than the king (it's a
French expression, I'm not sure it can be translated literally). 


   You are missing the point by a mile. This is not nationalism
 

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Don Armstrong wrote:

 On Fri, 23 May 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
  My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is
  miserable.

 Which part of the US?

Sorry I should have said Northeast US.  It's absolutely miserable here.

 Surely the weather in Los Angeles isn't
 miserable... unless you consider the total absense of weather to be
 miserable.


The West coast may be more expensive to get to for foreign visitors.  But
I like the other suggestion of Florida.  Lot's of cheap flights to there.

But it's all up to the organizers in the end isn't it?

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:

 Notice that the US governement never said that was their aim,

The aim is Kralizec -- the typhoon struggle.

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:

 PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
 Cuba than in US. Really.


So let me get this straight.  Instead of a country where people are
occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
clear.) you would rather go to a place where the immigration policy
consists of shooting people?


-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Adam Majer
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
 
  PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
  Cuba than in US. Really.
 
 
 So let me get this straight.  Instead of a country where people are
 occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
 Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
 clear.) you would rather go to a place where the immigration policy
 consists of shooting people?

s/Immigration/Emigration/ ? You do realize that US is pretty much the
only country that still has an embargo againt Cuba? Of course they
would not do the same to China.. H.. And why could that be?

2 commandments of Politics:
  1. follow the money
  2. see #1

Anyway, this is getting very off-topic Back to Debian. A!!

- Adam




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
 
  PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
  Cuba than in US. Really.
 
 
 So let me get this straight.  Instead of a country where people are
 occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
 Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
 clear.) you would rather go to a place where the immigration policy
 consists of shooting people?

And you do have proof of that claim, do you ? Or did you only gather
that from a bunch of James Bond movies ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-25 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

   On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
   You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
   U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel
   about the U.S. governments acts or positions?
 
   When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline
   industries suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of
   this then it'll keep the American economy down.
 
  I see. You all are personally taking action to make it harder for
  my friends and relatives to find a job, or get decent health care
  (my ex-boss has been looking for employment for 27 months now, and
  my step daughter does not have a job with benefits), and you expect
  me to have sympathy for your views?
 
  Do you have a better way of encougaging the U.S.A. to take an
  alternate stance?
 
   Try by not blackmailing us.

Wish to elaborate on that one a little?  I'm finding it hard to work out how
not blackmailing you is going to encourage the U.S.A. to rethink it's
policies.

  Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
  living.
 
   Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
  country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.

Boycott us back.  Considering the US government screws .au at every
opportunity, I doubt we'd even notice.


-- 
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16





Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 24 May 2003 09:51, Alan Shutko wrote:
  The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the
  world, in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
  world.

 Well, didn't work that way last time...

They got their second choice.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:14:48PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is miserable.
 I want to go somewhere warm!

Debian MiniConf @ Linux.conf.au, January 2004. 

http://conf.linux.org.au/. Speakers lined up for the main conference
(which tends to draw around 300-400 people) apparently include Tridge,
Rusty, Bdale, Keith Packard, Maddog, Rasmus and Havoc Pennington; the
call for papers will probably come out in a month or two. The Debian
miniconf drew ~50 people in 2002 and ~100 this year.

Please direct criticism of Australian foreign policy to /dev/null or
your local MP.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''


pgpVE5yPh7rup.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 06:15:48PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
 Hi Greg,
 
 Now that you've got this release out, have you given any thought to the
 message I sent earlier about merging gdb server versions?

Kindly get this on-topic shit out of this off-topic thread.  ;-)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| If God had intended for man to go
Debian GNU/Linux   | about naked, we would have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | born that way.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgpLrtb7Jybqw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread René Seindal
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:55:31PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
 
 This doesn't mean that we should not have a
 Debian conference in North America.  I'm sure there are many North
 American DDs who'd like to meet more DDs in person.  Having a
 conference in the US or Canada is not an endorsement of US foreign
 policy.

You all probably know that there are some serious privacy issues
involved in traveling to the US.  Carriers are forced to pass all their
information about the passengeres on to the US authorities, including:
previous connecting flight, place of orginal departure, requests for
special food (read: non pork), credit card information and other
personal information.

-- 
René Seindal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://sights.seindal.dk/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Bob Hilliard

 Please take all of these political screeds off -devel!!

Regards.

Bob
-- 
   _
  |_)  _  |_Robert D. Hilliard[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  |_) (_) |_)   1294 S.W. Seagull Way [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palm City, FL 34990 USA   GPG Key ID: 390D6559 





Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Ed Cogburn
Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2003 09:51, Alan Shutko wrote:
The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the
world, in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
world.
Well, didn't work that way last time...

They got their second choice.

I never chose Little Napolean and he wasn't on my alternate list either. 
 Please stop assuming everyone in a given country actually agrees with 
what their government has done or is doing.  This is the most 
distressing aspect of this thread:  Debian is (supposed to be) a group 
of intelligent, like-minded individuals whose individual nationality or 
origin is largely irrelevent.  There should be only 2 requirements for a 
conference:  someone is willing to sponsor it, and enough people are 
willing to come to make it worthwhile.  This idea that conference 
locations need to be vetted based on the politics of the host country is 
dangerous and stupid.  What Debian is about has nothing to do with 
individual nations or their politics.  We should be better than this.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 25 May 2003 02:24, Ed Cogburn wrote:
 Well, didn't work that way last time...
 
  They got their second choice.

 I never chose Little Napolean and he wasn't on my alternate list either.

Something between 49% and 50% of US voters wanted the Shrub as president.

   Please stop assuming everyone in a given country actually agrees with
 what their government has done or is doing.  This is the most

I don't assume that everyone agrees, just the 49.X% that voted for him.

 distressing aspect of this thread:  Debian is (supposed to be) a group
 of intelligent, like-minded individuals whose individual nationality or
 origin is largely irrelevent.  There should be only 2 requirements for a
 conference:  someone is willing to sponsor it, and enough people are
 willing to come to make it worthwhile.

Which is what I have said, repeatedly.

 This idea that conference
 locations need to be vetted based on the politics of the host country is
 dangerous and stupid.  What Debian is about has nothing to do with
 individual nations or their politics.  We should be better than this.

Be glad that I never suggested that the conference be held outside the US for 
this reason.

Someone asked why people would want to decline an opportunity to visit the US. 
I answered the question.  A bunch of USians started jumping up and down and 
the thread has continued ever since.

The most amusing thing was that no USian even bothered to ask me whether I am 
implementing such a boycot myself, they just made their assumptions and 
jumped into the flame-war.

My purchases of US products have not changed of recent times, they only things 
from the US that I want are made by Intel, AMD, IBM, and Ford.  Three of 
those companies have no viable non-US competition.

For avoiding entering the US there are better reasons such as the following:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1689.htm

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I don't assume that everyone agrees, just the 49.X% that voted for him.

This figure is not as meaningful as it might seem; we still use a
non-preferential voting system, in which votes for non-mainstream
candidates are effectively wasted. :-/

 The most amusing thing was that no USian even bothered to ask me
 whether I am implementing such a boycot myself, they just made their
 assumptions and jumped into the flame-war.

Toward the beginning of the thread, I specifically asked who would
actually be unwilling to show up, as opposed to merely knowing other
developers with that stance.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
 What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?

I would rather not come.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Sun, May 25, 2003, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
  What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
 
 I would rather not come.

   Neither would I. Given what happened to Sklyarov, I don't fancy going
to the USA at all. And like many others, I won't object, I merely won't
attend.

Sam.
-- 
Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sam.zoy.org/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Geordie Birch
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:32:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
 
 For avoiding entering the US there are better reasons such as the following:
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1689.htm

May 20, 2003.  French reporters covering Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) 
arrested, forcibly repatriated:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9609
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=6909




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-24 Thread Adam Majer
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:46:53PM -0400, Geordie Birch wrote:
 On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:32:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
  
  For avoiding entering the US there are better reasons such as the following:
  http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1689.htm
 
 May 20, 2003.  French reporters covering Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) 
 arrested, forcibly repatriated:
 http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9609
 http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=6909

Oh my god. The last time I heard this was the shocking news from 
Baghdad when CNN got thrown out by Saddam for not having the new
press visas.

There are even reports that Canadian citizens that have darker
skins are discriminated against. There was one _Canadian_ citizen
that got arrested in the US because he didn't have a visa

[NOTE: Canadians do not need visas to enter US and vice versa]

He was then deported to Sudan because apparently he immigrated
from there to Canada a two or three decades ago.


My parents got searched _twice_ (yes, including shoes!!) in the
states. They were going back home from Europe and they 
had to catch a connecting flight in Miniapolis, Minnesota.


Maybe it's just me, but it appears that people have less freedom
now if they travel to US, then when you travelled to 1970s
Soviet Union. Land of the free, lol.

- Adam

PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
Cuba than in US. Really.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Marc Singer
Perhaps we can look at this a different way.  I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'.  I'm supposing that all of us agree that
he's a snake-oil salesmen of the odious kind, interested most in
lining his pockets and the pockets of his pals at the expense of the
majority of US citizens as well as international citizens.  He is a
ignorant bully whose opinions and actions don't represent me or my
cohort.

Yet, it is reasonable to take personal representing our feelings.
There are folks who don't want to contribute an earned farthing to the
US economy.  So be it.  This doesn't mean that we should not have a
Debian conference in North America.  I'm sure there are many North
American DDs who'd like to meet more DDs in person.  Having a
conference in the US or Canada is not an endorsement of US foreign
policy.

It seems to me that the best place to have the conference in NA is
where we get support.  Should there be equal support in, for example,
Vancouver and DC, then we can weigh merits.  If we host it out of the
US, then at least we can keep our shoes on.

 What do you think of the boycots of French products?  Do you oppose
 them on principle?

I just bought some french-cut green beans. %^)




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Marc Singer
(Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)

On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
 Incidentally North America != USA.  

And your point is, what?

 A Canadian conference would be in North America and satisfy the
 objections of people who don't like the US, however it may be too
 far for some USians to travel.

There is no forseeable future where everyone is satisfied.

  I just bought some french-cut green beans. %^)
 
 Probably not from France.

Canada.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:55:31PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
 Perhaps we can look at this a different way.  I haven't read anyone
 voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
 loud) is a 'good fellow'.

Probably because it's completely off topic for this mailing list. Take
it to soc.politics or somewhere already.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
  While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
  non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
  part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
  coming into the country.
 
 Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
 the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
 this way?

I do.

Even though the US may be an interesting country for holidays, its
government has plastered so many limitations and violations of human
rights that I don't believe I'll ever visit the US again.  The DMCA is
one problem.  Surveillance and misuing personal data, e.g. gained from
the flight agencies are another one.  International politics is right
another problem I dislike too much.  I rather stay a free person in a
free country.

I don't object to a DebConf held in the U.S., though, but many people
will probably not even attend if somebody pays for their flight.
However, I would like DebConf's to be helt outside of the U.S.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
WARNING: Do not execute!  This call violates patent DE10108564.
http://www.elug.de/projekte/patent-party/patente/DE10108564

wget -O patinfo-`date +%Y%m%d`.html http://patinfo.ffii.org/

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Ed Cogburn
Martin Schulze wrote:
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
coming into the country.
Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
this way?

I do.
Even though the US may be an interesting country for holidays, its
government has plastered so many limitations and violations of human
rights that I don't believe I'll ever visit the US again.

That's funny considering just how many people are risking their LIVES to 
get here.  Then again, maybe its not, maybe its an insult to the ones 
who've died trying to get here over the years.


 The DMCA is one problem.

One which is not just a US headache.  The EU Copyright Directive is 
coming next, so where will all you Europeans run to when that law 
eventually comes into force?  Greed among businesses is universal, there 
are plenty of European companies who love that Copyright Directive and 
are pushing it hard.  Yes, I know, only two EU members have enacted it 
so far, but there is too much Big Money behind it for it to fail, its 
just a matter of time (according to the 2 articles I read).  BTW, you 
are aware the DMCA lost its last case in court over here, right?  The 
story is not over, my gut says it will at least be amended eventually.


Surveillance and misuing personal data, e.g. gained from
the flight agencies are another one.

And this is also only a US problem?  What about the public surveillance 
camaras in Britian and elsewhere?  You think the Isrealis are laissez 
faire when it comes to who they allow on their planes?  Big Brother is a 
problem everywhere, its only a problem here now because 9/11 was used as 
an excuse for a power grab.  We have an independent judiciary that will 
eventually decide if they've grabbed too much.


 International politics is right another problem I dislike too much.

One bad President and all of America is suddenly evil?  At most he has 
only about 6 more years, and there's a real chance it will only be about 
2, but you've already written us all off huh, even though this President 
didn't even win the majority vote, you're lumping us all together as 
miscreants with no chance at salvation?  I dislike politics period, all 
governments tend to behave selfishly, erratically, and stupidly, but 
that doesn't mean I'm going to draw up a 
DO-NOT-VISIT-THIS-COUNTRY-BECAUSE-I-DON'T-LIKE-THEIR-LEADER list. 
That's just silly.

 I rather stay a free person in a free country.
So do I, and I like it just where I am.

So do we REALLY want to turn this thread into yet another exercise in 
America bashing?  If someone wants to sponsor a conference here, FINE, 
let them, for heaven's sakes!  Most of the ones doing the bitching here 
would likely not come anyway because of the expense of getting here. 
And if the Europeans want to have a conference of their own, FINE, let 
them, for heaven's sake!  Most Americans won't come not because we're 
boycotting French Fries, but because WE can't afford the travel either. 
 Its not like there is some rule that says we can only have one 
conference at a time.  This whole thread is getting ridiculous.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Alan Shutko
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500
 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
  to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
  my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action. 

 What you say is just bad, bad, bad, and you should be ashamed.

Did you forget to take logic while you were in school?

 In the least it implies you personally are only friendly with people
 when you are taking their money. In other words, you dont have any true
 friends.

No, Manoj isn't implying that at all.  He said that if an individual
is taking a stand to hurt the US economy, he views that as an
unfriendly action.  He can certainly be friends with people who
aren't giving him money, but if someone has the intent I'm going to
take certain actions to hurt their economy and hope they learn a
lesson that's not friendly.

 On the Australia-US trade deal thats being worked on.
 If it worked out to be better for Australia than for the US, would you
 bear a grudge against all individual Australians ? 

See your below comment on separation between between governments and
individuals.

If the trade deal turned out to help Australia more than it helped
the US, who cares... we're still doing better.

If the trade deal _hurt_ the US while helping Australia, I'd be far
more likely to bear a grudge against the US politicians who
negotiated it, because it's pretty likely that they screwed the rest
of us for something that helped them out.

 There is a layer of abstraction been government and people, any action
 by or against your government is not necesarily an action from or against
 individual US'ians.

Yes, and that's what you seem to be missing.  The US economy is huge
mass of individuals.  Hurting the economy will certainly hurt
individual US'ians more than it will hurt anyone involved in
government (because those in government are usually independantly
wealthy).  So people intent on harming the US economy are intent
individuals.

This seems much the same rationale as spam fighters... trying to hurt
innocents in hopes they'll rise up and convince their ISP to take
some action.  Except with spam all that's lost is some mail... taking
deliberate actions to hurt an economy can destroy families.


 I hope you can see the obvious flaws in your comments, and can learn
 from your mistakes.

Ditto.

-- 
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I am the rocks.
Looking for a developer in St. Louis? http://web.springies.com/~ats/
I am Tigger of Borg! HooHooHoo...Assimilatin's what Tiggers do best!




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Marc Singer wrote:
 (Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
 
 On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
  Incidentally North America != USA.  
 
 And your point is, what?

that north america contains not one, but three countries: Candada, USA,
and Mexico

i'm a seppo (read: citizen of the USA), and it grates my ears each time
i hear American equated with citizen of USA. there are lots of people
that are americans, that come from North America, Central America, and
South America.

i do have a better word for US citizen, but it is so rarely used, no one
would understand it: Usian. for now, i will continue to use seppo, or
gringo, depending upon my mood and whom i am talking to (if speaking
with mexicans, i am usually a gringo).

this is entirely off topic for -devel, let's move it to -politics or
-curiosa or somewhere else more appropriate.

-john




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 23 May 2003 12:21:05 +1000, Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500
 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries to
 hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
 my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action.

 What you say is just bad, bad, bad, and you should be ashamed.

Ah yes. Argument by assertion. 

_You_ may live in a country where you may be ashamed to defend
 your friends and loved ones, but I do not. I do, however, pity you:
 If you think that when people express a desire to hurt your
 relatives, you need to feel ashamed if you raise a voice in protest,
 you really should get the heck out of your country.

 In the least it implies you personally are only friendly with people
 when you are taking their money. In other words, you dont have any
 true friends.

Ah. Either you can't read, or you have absolutely no concept
 of logic. In either case this discussion is doomed; but let me try an
 exercise in futility.

I said If you are acting in a desire to hurt my loved ones by
 hurting an already fragile economy, I see this action as inimical.
 How you got from there to ascribing mercenary motivations to me is
 beyond me. 

 On the Australia-US trade deal thats being worked on.  If it worked
 out to be better for Australia than for the US, would you bear a
 grudge against all individual Australians ?  If it was more
 benificial to the US would you be friendlier to Australians ?

If you can't distinguish between a trade deal (which usually
 is biased one way or the other) and an stated intention to harm my
 economy, I suggest you also need introductory courses in economic
 theory. 

 If your countrymen share that sort of attitute it explains why the
 USA is in so many wars.

Yeah. We rarely suffer fools gladly.

 There is a layer of abstraction been government and people, any
 action by or against your government is not necesarily an action
 from or against individual US'ians.

But the intention was not to protest the actions of my
 government, or to act against it in the UN. It was to get down and
 try to hurt my friends and family by hurting the economy that
 nurtures us, in the hope that we shall be blackmailed into changing
 our government.

I do not like coercion. 

 I hope you can see the obvious flaws in your comments, and can learn
 from your mistakes.

That will be the day.

manoj
-- 
Now I lay me down to sleep I hear the sirens in the street All my
dreams are made of chrome I have no way to get back home Tom Waits
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 22 May 2003 20:55:31 -0700, Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Perhaps we can look at this a different way.  I haven't read anyone
 voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
 loud) is a 'good fellow'.  I'm supposing that all of us agree that
 he's a snake-oil salesmen of the odious kind, interested most in
 lining his pockets and the pockets of his pals at the expense of the
 majority of US citizens as well as international citizens.  He is a
 ignorant bully whose opinions and actions don't represent me or my
 cohort.

While I personally may not be unsympathetic to that line of
 reasoning, you should realize that the president enjoys a high
 approval rating domestically, and so not all people agree with that
 sentiment.

I think this is the basic flaw of people espousing your views
 on this subject: You are so convinced of your utter infallibility
 that any action you propose in accordance with your viewpoint are
 justified; which is ironical, since that is precisely what you accuse
 the americans of doing.


manoj
-- 
We're only in it for the volume. Black Sabbath
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:43:22 -0500, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 It may be too little if only one person does it... But I know *MANY*
 people who simply will avoid (to de extent possible in Mexico, at
 least) buying any American goods.

 In my particular cas -and I think many other developers will agree-
 this did not suddenly start with the Iraqi war - The USA have long
 been a country with little or none respect for privacy and freedom,
 standing in the way of technological advance.

 How will it help anything? First of all, if they notice that they
 are ceasing to be the focus of technological development, they might
 understand that they are doing something wrong. And even if they
 don't, at least I feel better ;-)

It is easy to take actions secure in the feeling that there
 are no consequences (which seems to be part of your complaint against
 my goverment).

Hmm. What if  I pass this mail around locally and
 reciprocate. IU doubt if people in my community would be happy about
 tis boycott.  This could get to be fun. I'll send it along to all my
 relatives here in the US who put me on the chain lists. If we get
 enough people in the US participating in this boycott, it may make a
 difference.

Since we all ugly americans, we may need to be educated about
 where this .cx place is ;-)

manoj
-- 
There's no saint like a reformed sinner.
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 23 May 2003 12:38:09 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 On Fri, 23 May 2003 03:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of living
 of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my government
 (which I have little control over), and you expect me to roll over
 and congratulate you all on your stance? Hell, my first instinct is
 to try and see how I can retaliate.

 Great!  Now we are making some progress.  The US (both government
 and people) does this sort of thing routinely to other countries.
 Most Americans can't understand why it will make people outside the
 US unhappy.

We, the american people, delibrately go out of our way to try
 and hurt the economy of other countries? Hell, we don't ewven know
 where most of the countries inthe world are, far less be bothered to
 individually go out and try to hurt their economies.

My government may do things in a fashion that could be
 improved (to put it mildly), but as a people, we are generally
 benevolent, until something impinges on our consciousness and makes
 us take notice. And given our collective attention span, it takes a
 lot. 

 Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries to
 hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
 my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action.

 It seems that a large portion of the US population is trying to hurt
 the economy of any country that doesn't follow the US line (see
 France as an example).

Yes. There is a segment of the population which is indeed
 taking what I would call enemy action against france. But we are also
 prepared to live with the retaliatory consequences of our actions. 

 What do you think of the boycots of French products?  Do you oppose
 them on principle?

Actually, I do, since I think that the French government did
 nothing illegal, and was well within its rights to decide as it
 damed well pleases; but having stated my opinion as an american, I am
 not going to pass the buck when it comes to actions some americans
 are taking, even if I disagree. 

 PS How exactly would you retaliate against the rest of the world?

I dunno. Depends on pissed I am. 

 PPS Be grateful that you have more control over your government than
 I have over mine.  My government obeys yours.

So you can't control your government to do the right thing,
 and in frustration you lash out against my family?

manoj
-- 
In an age when the fashion is to be in love with yourself, confessing
to be in love with somebody else is an admission of unfaithfulness to
one's beloved. Russell Baker
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Marc Singer
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:03:38AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
 Marc Singer wrote:
  (Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
  
  On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
   Incidentally North America != USA.  
  
  And your point is, what?
 
 that north america contains not one, but three countries: Candada, USA,
 and Mexico

Good grief.  If you'd read the original message carefully, you'd
notice that I know the difference.  I wrote North America and meant it.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Amaya
Stephen Frost dijo:
 Those who have concerns or political issues need not attend but that
 should not stop the conference from happening if there are enough
 people who are interested.

Absolutely true, but I found Canada much mor affordable than the States
last summer ;-)

-- 
  I would rather starve than lose your acceptance
 .''`.My eyes will always show my empty soul
: :' :- Boy Sets Fire
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.4.20 Ext3)
  `-   www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Matt Ryan
  If your countrymen share that sort of attitute it explains why the
  USA is in so many wars.

 Yeah. We rarely suffer fools gladly.

Stop it, you're killing me. People from the USA describing others as fools.
One only has to look at the dross in US newspapers and TV news bulletins to
understand the level of understanding that most Americans have of the world
outside their own trousers.


Matt.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Mathieu Roy
   My government may do things in a fashion that could be
  improved (to put it mildly), but as a people, we are generally
  benevolent, until something impinges on our consciousness and makes
  us take notice. And given our collective attention span, it takes a
  lot. 

I'm not a DD but I find very strange all this nationalist talk on this
mailing-list. 

Discussing whether US-Americans are a people like that or this
seems to me very appropriate for a flame-war, not to schedule an
event.

Frankly, such generalization (American are all a good/bad people)
seems very childish. What's the point in the end, about the meeting?


-- 
Mathieu Roy
 
  Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
  Not a native english speaker: 
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Marc Singer wrote:

 Perhaps we can look at this a different way.  I haven't read anyone
 voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
 loud) is a 'good fellow'.

Well since you asked.  I think GWB is a 'good fellow'.

  I'm supposing that all of us agree that
 he's a snake-oil salesmen of the odious kind, interested most in
 lining his pockets and the pockets of his pals at the expense of the
 majority of US citizens as well as international citizens.

Nope.  Don't agree at all.

My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is miserable.
I want to go somewhere warm!

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 07:07:19PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
   If your countrymen share that sort of attitute it explains why the
   USA is in so many wars.
 
  Yeah. We rarely suffer fools gladly.
 
 Stop it, you're killing me. People from the USA describing others as fools.
 One only has to look at the dross in US newspapers and TV news bulletins to
 understand the level of understanding that most Americans have of the world
 outside their own trousers.

/me invokes azeem's law[0]. This thread has ended.


Michael

-- 
[0] Whenever Matt Ryan enters a Flamewar, no more non-value can be added
to it and therefore the thread will die.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Jarno Elonen
 That's funny considering just how many people are risking their LIVES to
 get here.  Then again, maybe its not, maybe its an insult to the ones
 who've died trying to get here over the years.

I don't think not wanting to go somewhere is an insult to other people who do 
want to go there.

   The DMCA is one problem.

 One which is not just a US headache.  The EU Copyright Directive is
 coming next, so where will all you Europeans run to when that law
 eventually comes into force?

1) It's fortuantely not here yet
2) Even the proposal is not as bad as DMCA and most countries will
   implement a much milder laws than suggested
3) Even if the DMCA was copied verbatim to Finland, I would prefer to
   get prosecuted near home where I know the culture and can speak
   my native language

 And this is also only a US problem?

Don't take us wrong, of course it's not. It's just that US IPR enforcement 
policies there are currently quite unpredictable and the general (or even 
*official*) attitude toward foreigners isn't exactly warm at the moment.

Please don't take it as a personal insult. I've visited USA multiple times, 
like especially NYC and have taken some very nice photos from the WTC etc. 
Still, even if I'm overly cautios, I just don't want to risk getting 
imprisoned in a foreign land for contributing to Transcode, for example. The 
situation may change in the future, of course.

I bet there are places where American Debian developer's don't feel safe to 
travel either but I doubt you mean it as an insult to people living there - 
or people wanting to move there.

- Jarno




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi,

On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:14:48PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:

 On Thu, 22 May 2003, Marc Singer wrote:
 
  Perhaps we can look at this a different way.  I haven't read anyone
  voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
  loud) is a 'good fellow'.
 
 Well since you asked.  I think GWB is a 'good fellow'.

Yes. Too bad he didn't happily stay being a good fellow on his ranch in
Texas.

Cheers,


Emile.

-- 
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153   http://www.e-advies.nl


pgpaRtbeDPTJj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Matt Ryan
Michael Banck wrote:
 /me invokes azeem's law[0]. This thread has ended.

 [0] Whenever Matt Ryan enters a Flamewar, no more non-value can be added
 to it and therefore the thread will die.

I'm not sure why you see my input as non-value? Surely its not the fact that
a bunch of tightly wound geeks don't like what I preach? If so, please try
living outside of the flock and rebel against the herd mentality.
As for your rule, please review my thread on Daft Internet Stuff for a
run-down on my view of such things.


Matt.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread geordie
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:10:35PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 On Fri, 23 May 2003 12:38:09 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 
 
  PPS Be grateful that you have more control over your government than
  I have over mine.  My government obeys yours.
 
   So you can't control your government to do the right thing,
  and in frustration you lash out against my family?

No one is lashing out against your family, although you may well be 
collaterally 
damaged.  You could (a) deal with it, or (b) migrate.

Geordie.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is
 miserable.

Which part of the US? Surely the weather in Los Angeles isn't
miserable... unless you consider the total absense of weather to be
miserable.

 I want to go somewhere warm!

107F and 100% humidity isn't warm enough for you? [Temp and Humidity
in Ft. AP Hill a few years ago August.]

Maybe we should hold a conference in Death Valley? [120F 48C for 43
consecutive days...[1]]


Don Armstrong
1: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/MichaelLevin.shtml
-- 
EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN
Don't be teased or humiliated. See their look of surprise when you
step right up to a urinal and use it with a smile. Get Dr. Mary Evers'
EQUAL-NOW Adapter (pat. appld. for) -- purse size, fool proof,
sanitary -- comes in nine lovely, feminine, psychadelic patterns --
requires no fitting, no prescriptions.
 -- Robert A Heinlein _I Will Fear No Evil_ p470.

http://www.donarmstrong.com
http://www.anylevel.com
http://rzlab.ucr.edu


pgpknz1PvxX2Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:14:48PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is miserable.
 I want to go somewhere warm!

You want warm? Come out to Southern California, Florida, or Hawaii for
warm weather pretty much the whole year 'round. We don't have to have a
conference in the Northeast, after all.

 - David Nusinow




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

 On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:  
  On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
  You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
  U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel
  about the U.S. governments acts or positions?
 
  When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline
  industries suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of this
  then it'll keep the American economy down.
 
   I see. You all are personally taking action to make it harder
  for my friends and relatives to find a job, or get decent health care
  (my ex-boss has been looking for employment for 27 months now, and my
  step daughter does not have a job with benefits), and you expect me
  to have sympathy for your views?

Do you have a better way of encougaging the U.S.A. to take an alternate
stance?  It's fairly clear that they don't actually give a shit about the UN
or anyone else, so we can't just express our displeasure and expect Bush
and cronies to give a shit.

The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the world,
in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the world.  So,
it goes like this:

* The rest of the world is sick to death of US imperialism;

* The US government ignores world opinion and does it's thing;

* The rest of the world puts pressure on the US people to change things,
since they've at least got half a chance to make changes;

* The US people make the change, or live with the consequences of not
changing.

Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a living.

   You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of
  living of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my
  government (which I have little control over), and you expect me to
  roll over and congratulate you all on your stance? Hell, my first
  instinct is to try and see how I can retaliate.

Not looking for congratulations.  Again, from where I'm sitting, you've got
more direct influence over US policy than I do.  If you have a better
suggestion of how foreigners can influence US policy, I'd love to hear it.

   Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
  to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
  my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action. 

And most of the world does not see the actions of your government (and,
since you live in a democracy it truly is *your* government - remember,
of the people, by the people, and for the people, or some such) as overly
friendly, I don't quite see the problem.


-- 
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16





Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Alan Shutko
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the world,
 in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
 world. 

Well, didn't work that way last time...

-- 
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I am the rocks.
Looking for a developer in St. Louis? http://web.springies.com/~ats/
Death row is entirely too small and empty.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Philip Charles
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Alan Shutko wrote:

 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the world,
  in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
  world.

 Well, didn't work that way last time...

Maybe the US should elect its President in the same way as Debian
elects its DPL.

Phil.

--
  Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
   +64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875Mobile 025 267 9420
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I sell GNU/Linux  GNU/Hurd CDs.   See http://www.copyleft.co.nz




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-23 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:05:08AM -0500]:
   It is easy to take actions secure in the feeling that there
  are no consequences (which seems to be part of your complaint against
  my goverment).

Not at all. I know that if your economy suffers, mine suffers doubly so.
Mexico is so heavily dependent on the US economy that if you enter a
mild recession we are in crisis... And it is not nice at all. However, I
often say -and this war over petroleum is a good example- that I hope
the US economy will suffer. I know that if this happens I will also
temporarily suffer the results. I am willing to. I justhope that Europe
comes out strengthened, that Europe can effectively become a second
superpower - I am not wishing this in order to harm your family. My
family suffers as well. I wish for this because it is fairier to the
world. In the world there are more families than yours and mine.

   Hmm. What if  I pass this mail around locally and
  reciprocate. IU doubt if people in my community would be happy about
  tis boycott.  This could get to be fun. I'll send it along to all my
  relatives here in the US who put me on the chain lists. If we get
  enough people in the US participating in this boycott, it may make a
  difference.

I doubt this mail is worth much - I am no much good at writing in
English, specially if done just as a mail an swer in a tiring
flamewar...  But you can find myriads of interesting people expressing
basically the same all over the net.

   Since we all ugly americans, we may need to be educated about
  where this .cx place is ;-)

As I told you, I am Mexican, and live in Mexico... Sadly, TLDs don't say
much about us - I got a .cx because they were for free for some time :)
- It is the Christmas Island, I understand that an Australian
protectorate, between Australia and Indonesia.

Greetings,

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 22:07, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 [I've already asked a few relevant individuals about this, but am
 opening it up to the list at their suggestion.]
 
 I've recently been in touch with somebody (a lawyer and professor
 concerned with government open source policy) who is interested in
 sponsoring a Debian conference here in Washington, DC, next spring, in
 conjunction with an international conference on open source in
 government.

Sounds like a good idea to me!  If we have a sponsor, it makes sense to
use the opportunity.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Please don't hold the conference in the U.S.  I am a Canadian
 who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared
 it was at war.

You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
the U.S. governments acts or positions?

-Miles
-- 
A zen-buddhist walked into a pizza shop and
said, Make me one with everything.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:06:17PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
 Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Please don't hold the conference in the U.S.  I am a Canadian
  who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared
  it was at war.
 
 You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
 U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
 the U.S. governments acts or positions?

I think he meant the war against terrorists, which could potentially
include anyone as ennemy.

Friendly,

Sven Luther




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Hi Greg,

Now that you've got this release out, have you given any thought to the
message I sent earlier about merging gdb server versions?

Here it is again in case you've forgotten:


Hi,

The current version of gdbserver in uClinux-dist only works on the m68k.
In my v850-specific version of uClinux-dist, I include a version of
gdbserver that works on the v850, which I created based on gdb-5.3.  I
think it should generally be much more portable than the old version, as
it's far less hacked up (the only changes I made to put it into the
uClinux-dist/user tree are to move the files around to fit the old
scheme better; I have a shell script that does that automatically).

I haven't yet sent my patches to gdb-central because I'm waiting to get
a copyright disclaimer, but perhaps you might want to include this newer
version in uClinux-dist?

I suppose it will work on other platforms too; the issues that I know
about are:

 (1) In linux-low.c, I do this to get the various address offsets
 (similar to the code in the old m68k gdbserver, which uses
 hard-wired constants):

text = ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, pid, (long)PT_TEXT_ADDR, 0);
text_len = ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, pid, (long)PT_TEXT_LEN, 0);
real_data = ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, pid, (long)PT_DATA_ADDR, 0);

 I defined PT_TEXT_ADDR, PT_TEXT_LEN, and PT_DATA_ADDR in
 include/asm-v850/ptrace.h in the kernel:

/* These are `magic' values for PTRACE_PEEKUSR that return info
   about where a process is located in memory.  */
#define PT_TEXT_ADDR(PT_SIZE + 1)
#define PT_TEXT_LEN (PT_SIZE + 2)
#define PT_DATA_ADDR(PT_SIZE + 3)

 Could you add similar to defines to the other uClinux ports, so
 that the linux-low.c code will work on them too?  BTW, notice that
 I used `PT_TEXT_LEN' instead of `PT_TEXT_END_ADDR' (which is
 what the m68k uses), as addr-len pairs generally seem cleaner to
 me than addr-endaddr pairs (makes the code slightly simpler too).

 (2) Since stuff in uClinux-dist comes `pre-configured' (i.e. doesn't
 get to run the configure script), and I of course configured it for
 the v850, the gdbserver Makefile needs to somehow select the proper
 machine-dependent files to use.  Currently the only
 machine-dependent bits seem to be these:

DEPFILES = reg-v850e.o linux-low.o linux-v850e-low.o 

 Perhaps it would be good enough to change this to something like:

DEPFILES = reg-$(CPU).o linux-low.o linux-$(CPU)-low.o 

 But I'm not sure where I can get CPU from; is there something
 handy in the uClinux-dist Makefiles that could be used?  The set
 of CPU values used in (my version of) gdbserver are:

v850e, s390, arm, x86-64, i386, mips, ppc, sh, ia64, m68k

 So it seems that the most `obvious' value should work OK Hmmm,
 perhaps I ought to change `v850e' to be `v850' for compatibility
 with the kernel, etc... sigh.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks,

-Miles

-- 
`To alcohol!  The cause of, and solution to,
 all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
 You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
 U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
 the U.S. governments acts or positions?

When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries 
suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of this then it'll keep the 
American economy down.

If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government won't 
last.  Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy people who 
lose their jobs because of the economy sucking.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Simon Law ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   Please don't hold the conference in the U.S.  I am a Canadian
 who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared
 it was at war.

If we have a sponsor and there are enough interested parties to warrent
it I think we should do it.  I certainly think there's enough interest
and it sounds like we have a sponsor.  Those who have concerns or
political issues need not attend but that should not stop the conference
from happening if there are enough people who are interested.

Stephen


pgpXTYNQtYtpC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi,

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:

 On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
  You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
  U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
  the U.S. governments acts or positions?
 
 When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries 
 suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of this then it'll keep the 
 American economy down.
 
 If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government won't 
 last.  Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy people who 
 lose their jobs because of the economy sucking.

Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts only strenghen the position of
the rogue leaders (See? They are all against us! We need to protect
ourselves! You need a strong man to protect you! Etc.)

Cheers,


Emile.

-- 
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153   http://www.e-advies.nl




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Mathieu Roy
Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :

 Hi,
 
 On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
 
  On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
   You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
   U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
   the U.S. governments acts or positions?
  
  When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries 
  suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of this then it'll keep 
  the 
  American economy down.
  
  If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government won't 
  last.  Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy people who 
  lose their jobs because of the economy sucking.
 
 Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts only strenghen the position of
 the rogue leaders (See? They are all against us! We need to protect
 ourselves! You need a strong man to protect you! Etc.)

Both points of view make sense. 

Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a
good compromise for everybody.
People that do not want to go to USA are not forced to, others that do
not think USA should be avoided would surely agree to go elsewhere too.



-- 
Mathieu Roy
 
  Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
  Not a native english speaker: 
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Both points of view make sense. 
 
 Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a
 good compromise for everybody.
 People that do not want to go to USA are not forced to, others that do
 not think USA should be avoided would surely agree to go elsewhere too.

As one of the 200+ developers in the USA I don't feel it should be
avoided and I feel quite out in the cold most of the time when these
conferences come around because I don't have the funds to go elsewhere.
I don't see any problem with having conferences in the USA, or other
places for that matter, provided there are enough people who will go to
warrent it and there is someone willing to sponsor it.  Lots of people
might not be willing to go to the USA for political reasons, probably
more would find it cost prohibitive.  The same is true for conferences
outside the USA, I'm sure quite a few developers find that cost
prohibitive too, and I imagine there are USA developers who dislike the
actions of other countries and would avoid conferences there too.  This
doesn't mean we shouldn't have any conferences.

Stephen


pgpDXiyWkGeQo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:06, Mathieu Roy wrote:
   If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government
   won't last.  Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy
   people who lose their jobs because of the economy sucking.
 
  Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts only strenghen the position of
  the rogue leaders (See? They are all against us! We need to protect
  ourselves! You need a strong man to protect you! Etc.)

 Both points of view make sense.

 Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a
 good compromise for everybody.
 People that do not want to go to USA are not forced to, others that do
 not think USA should be avoided would surely agree to go elsewhere too.

I have no objections to a conference in the US.  If there are enough people 
interested in attending to make it a good conference then it should be run.  
The US has a large population, they should be able to justify a conference 
without any visitors from other countries.

I can't rule out the possibility of attending myself.

I was merely pointing out one of the reasons why many people are avoiding the 
US.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:  

 On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
 You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
 U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel
 about the U.S. governments acts or positions?

 When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline
 industries suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of this
 then it'll keep the American economy down.

I see. You all are personally taking action to make it harder
 for my friends and relatives to find a job, or get decent health care
 (my ex-boss has been looking for employment for 27 months now, and my
 step daughter does not have a job with benefits), and you expect me
 to have sympathy for your views?

You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of
 living of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my
 government (which I have little control over), and you expect me to
 roll over and congratulate you all on your stance? Hell, my first
 instinct is to try and see how I can retaliate.

Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
 to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
 my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action. 

manoj
-- 
A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats. Ben
Franklin
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 12:17:32PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
 As one of the 200+ developers in the USA I don't feel it should be
 avoided and I feel quite out in the cold most of the time when these
 conferences come around because I don't have the funds to go elsewhere.
 I don't see any problem with having conferences in the USA, or other
 places for that matter, provided there are enough people who will go to
 warrent it and there is someone willing to sponsor it.  Lots of people
 might not be willing to go to the USA for political reasons, probably
 more would find it cost prohibitive.  The same is true for conferences
 outside the USA, I'm sure quite a few developers find that cost
 prohibitive too, and I imagine there are USA developers who dislike the
 actions of other countries and would avoid conferences there too.  This
 doesn't mean we shouldn't have any conferences.

exactly.

Michael




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Joey Hess
Stephen Frost wrote:
 I don't see any problem with having conferences in the USA, or other
 places for that matter, provided there are enough people who will go to
 warrent it and there is someone willing to sponsor it.  Lots of people
 might not be willing to go to the USA for political reasons, probably
 more would find it cost prohibitive.  The same is true for conferences
 outside the USA, I'm sure quite a few developers find that cost
 prohibitive too, and I imagine there are USA developers who dislike the
 actions of other countries and would avoid conferences there too.

It's really not any more expensive to travel to Toronto or Vancouver
than it is to travel a similar distance inside the US[1]. Once you get
there you'll find that the conference is cheaper since the Canadian
dollar is (still) weaker than the US dollar. And I know of approixmatly
zero Americans who have reason to boycott Canada. Sorry, argument does
not fly.

Anyway, I'd love to see a conference in DC, since I have family there,
and it's only 5 hours away by car. I'm looking forward to Oslo more
though, if I can find cheap plane tickets!

-- 
see shy jo

[1] If you're low on cash and it's on the right side of the continent, 
you go by car. Or greyhound!


pgpWCSZ4tvI9z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
 Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :

  On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
  
   On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
the U.S. governments acts or positions?
   
   When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries 
   suffer.  If enough people boycott the US because of this then it'll keep 
   the 
   American economy down.
   
   If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government 
   won't 
   last.  Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy people 
   who 
   lose their jobs because of the economy sucking.
  
  Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts only strenghen the position of
  the rogue leaders (See? They are all against us! We need to protect
  ourselves! You need a strong man to protect you! Etc.)

 Both points of view make sense. 

 Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a
 good compromise for everybody.

The sponsors aren't *offering* to sponsor a conference outside the US.
Most of the arguments against holding a conference in the US are
therefore irrelevant.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


pgpkWQY1fcQmw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Miles Bader dijo [Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:06:17PM +0900]:
 Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Please don't hold the conference in the U.S.  I am a Canadian
  who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared
  it was at war.
 
 You mean the iraq war?  What's the point?  How is avoiding the
 U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
 the U.S. governments acts or positions?

It may be too little if only one person does it... But I know *MANY*
people who simply will avoid (to de extent possible in Mexico, at least)
buying any American goods. 

In my particular cas -and I think many other developers will agree- this
did not suddenly start with the Iraqi war - The USA have long been a
country with little or none respect for privacy and freedom, standing in
the way of technological advance. 

How will it help anything? First of all, if they notice that they are
ceasing to be the focus of technological development, they might
understand that they are doing something wrong. And even if they don't,
at least I feel better ;-)

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 It's really not any more expensive to travel to Toronto or Vancouver
 than it is to travel a similar distance inside the US[1]. Once you get
 there you'll find that the conference is cheaper since the Canadian
 dollar is (still) weaker than the US dollar. And I know of approixmatly
 zero Americans who have reason to boycott Canada. Sorry, argument does
 not fly.

It's alot cheaper if the conference is in DC for me since there'd be
basically no additional cost involved.  A conference in Toronto or
Vancouver would be more expensive due to travel time, hotel cost, etc.
Though I might be as willing to go to Toronto as NYC if there was
a conference there.  It seems the conferences are often in Europe though
which is definitely more expensive than pretty much anywhere on the east
coast for me.

Stephen


pgpalPImAnWu0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Jarno Elonen
 As other people have said: I'm not going, but I don't object to a
 conference in the US per se.

Same here. Even if I had the money to attend, I wouldn't like to travel to the 
US because of the new copyright and anti-terrorist laws. Still, I think it's 
a good idea to arrange a conference for the American developers.

- Jarno




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
  to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
  my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action. 

What you say is just bad, bad, bad, and you should be ashamed.

In the least it implies you personally are only friendly with people
when you are taking their money. In other words, you dont have any true
friends.

On the Australia-US trade deal thats being worked on.
If it worked out to be better for Australia than for the US, would you
bear a grudge against all individual Australians ? 
If it was more benificial to the US would you be friendlier to
Australians ?

If your countrymen share that sort of attitute it explains why the USA
is in so many wars.

There is a layer of abstraction been government and people, any action
by or against your government is not necesarily an action from or against
individual US'ians.

I hope you can see the obvious flaws in your comments, and can learn
from your mistakes.




Glenn




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  And I know of approixmatly zero Americans who have reason to boycott
 Canada.

Er, well.  I doubt there's a government in existance that hasn't done
something objectionable enough to piss off a foreigner somewhere (e.g.,
recent european attempts to export their censorship laws on the net).

I seem to recall Canada doing some very moronic things with respect to free
speech in the '80s that engendered a fair amount of anger among people I knew
(Americans), though I can't recall why it was of cross-border significance

[The U.S. has been unusually moronic lately though (the basic `anti-people'
stance of Bush's minions is pretty scary).]

-Miles
-- 
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, 
 beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 23 May 2003 03:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of
  living of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my
  government (which I have little control over), and you expect me to
  roll over and congratulate you all on your stance? Hell, my first
  instinct is to try and see how I can retaliate.

Great!  Now we are making some progress.  The US (both government and people) 
does this sort of thing routinely to other countries.  Most Americans can't 
understand why it will make people outside the US unhappy.

 Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
  to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
  my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action.

It seems that a large portion of the US population is trying to hurt the 
economy of any country that doesn't follow the US line (see France as an 
example).

What do you think of the boycots of French products?  Do you oppose them on 
principle?


PS  How exactly would you retaliate against the rest of the world?

PPS  Be grateful that you have more control over your government than I have 
over mine.  My government obeys yours.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-21 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
 food, flights and tshirts?

His response:

} We would provide the conference facilities and try to get accomodations with
} some LUG members. There may be more, but I need to check what else we could
} provide.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-21 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
*  (Aaron M. Ucko)

| Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
| the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
| this way?

As other people have said: I'm not going, but I don't object to a
conference in the US per se.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are  : :' :
  `. `' 
`-  




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-21 Thread Simon Law
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:25:47PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
  non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
  part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
  coming into the country.
 
 Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
 the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
 this way?

Please don't hold the conference in the U.S.  I am a Canadian
who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared
it was at war.

Simon




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-20 Thread Joe Drew
On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 22:07, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?

While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
coming into the country.

For those reasons, I am planning to organise Debconf 4 in Vancouver (or
maybe somewhere else, if there's a lot of hate for vancouver) sometime
in the summer of 2004.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-20 Thread Marc Singer
 For those reasons, I am planning to organise Debconf 4 in Vancouver (or
 maybe somewhere else, if there's a lot of hate for vancouver) sometime
 in the summer of 2004.

Yipee!




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-20 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
 non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
 part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
 coming into the country.

Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
this way?

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-20 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ti, 2003-05-20 at 20:25, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
  non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
  part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
  coming into the country.
 
 Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
 the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
 this way?

I do. The DMCA, and various laws and regulations made after 2001-09-11
combined with the suspicion that the US has me listed as an
international arms dealer make me nervous about entering their
jurisdiction.

I have no objection to a Debconf in the US, however. On the contrary, I
think it'd be a good idea. There's a ton of developers in the US, and
many more willing to travel to the US for a conference, so it'd be silly
not to.

-- 
Enemies of Carlotta 1.0 mailing list manager: http://liw.iki.fi/liw/eoc/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-20 Thread Richard Braakman
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:25:47PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
 the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
 this way?

I do.  These days I won't travel to the US even if somebody would
pay me to.  It's just not safe.  Don't let that stop you from holding
a conference, though -- if you already live there, it's no extra risk :)

Richard Braakman




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-20 Thread Roland Mas
Aaron M. Ucko (2003-05-20 13:25:47 -0400) :

 Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number
 of non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil,
 due in part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to
 non-americans coming into the country.

 Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always
 in the third person.  I ask again, who on this list actually still
 feels this way?

I do.  A combination of DMCA, a certain affinity towards cryptography,
a certain dislike for some of the USA's behaviours (notably on the
international scene), a particular dislike against dissimulating my
opinions especially regarding the previous point, and a large
République Française written on my passport, makes me feel I would
not be very welcome in the USA.  That's only my personal opinion
though, and I'm in no way trying to turn anyone from organising a
Debconf in the USA or attending it.

Roland.
-- 
Roland Mas

Fate always wins...  At least, when people stick to the rules.
  -- in Interesting Times (Terry Pratchett)




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-19 Thread Brian Nelson
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?

 If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally don't how about we
 have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
 nothern Virginia are myself.

 Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if conferences
 do get to the East coast, they are always in New York. That leaves the
 south eastern US folks out in the cold.

Wrong.  It doesn't get cold out in the southeastern US.  :P

-- 
Looks like excitement by repetition!




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-19 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
 * As mentioned, we have an enthusiastic sponsor lined up, which is a
   definite plus.

What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
food, flights and tshirts?




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-19 Thread Stephen Frost
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?

I'm all for it, and GWU would be most excellent in my view.  Of course,
I live just outside DC... ;)

Stephen


pgpSnD1TuI4Jx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-19 Thread Michael Tindal
-Original Message-
From: Brian Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 1:05 AM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?

 If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally don't how about we
 have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
 nothern Virginia are myself.

 Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if conferences
 do get to the East coast, they are always in New York. That leaves the
 south eastern US folks out in the cold.

 Wrong.  It doesn't get cold out in the southeastern US.  :P

Wrong.  It DOES get cold.  Just not AS cold as the northern US.  :P

Mike




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-18 Thread Ben Collins
 What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?

If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally don't how about we
have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
nothern Virginia are myself.

Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if conferences
do get to the East coast, they are always in New York. That leaves the
south eastern US folks out in the cold.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/




Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally don't how about we
 have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
 nothern Virginia are myself.

This would probably be in DC proper (specifically, at GWU) -- so a bit
further north/east, but still well south of NY and thus hitting a
previously neglected region.

 Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if conferences
 do get to the East coast, they are always in New York. That leaves the
 south eastern US folks out in the cold.

Indeed.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.




  1   2   >