Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 09:49:22PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why Dan the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is Dan missing a lot of important symbols. I can't figure it out. Ben The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc Ben sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem? Dan I present Dan http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc Dan for your enjoyment... Dan Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8. Wow. How does 2.90 compile out to become 2.8? The same way egcs 1.1b becomes gcc 2.91.53. The one is an interface number and the other an internal version. Dan
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:56:56PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why Dan the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is Dan missing a lot of important symbols. I can't figure it out. The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem? I present http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc for your enjoyment... Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8. Dan
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why Dan the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is Dan missing a lot of important symbols. I can't figure it out. Ben The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc Ben sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem? Dan I present Dan http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc Dan for your enjoyment... Dan Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8. Wow. How does 2.90 compile out to become 2.8? -- Brought to you by the letters U and N and the number 8. Frungy! Frungy! Frungy!! -- ZokFotPik, SCII Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/ I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without a -dev. Is anyone going to do this? Ben See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is missing a lot of important symbols. I can't figure it out. Dan
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why Dan the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is Dan missing a lot of important symbols. I can't figure it out. The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem? Ben -- Brought to you by the letters Q and S and the number 19. The spiraling shape will make you go insane! -- They Might Be Giants Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/ I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 12:54:27PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Ray == Ray J.H.M. writes: Ray Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on Ray libstdc++2.8 recompiled for libstdc++2.9 . Of course, of course, nobody's arguing that. APT will be recompiled for libstdc++2.9. However, commercial apps and apps that are not part of Debian will come linked to 2.8, and we should support that. Ok, do we have a consensus? 2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib. All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if possable? Any disaggreement? Zephaniah E, Hull. -- Brought to you by the letters N and J and the number 15. Son, I am able, she said, though you scare me. -- They Might Be Giants Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/ I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpZ38oLtnwLC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, do we have a consensus? 2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib. All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if possable?^ | You of course ment 2.9, but everyone knew that, right ? :) Any disaggreement? Nope, not from me... -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( D | e | b | i | a | n ) Debian Certified Linux Developer \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ Surrey/B.C./Canada -- kibo KGB Peking Soviet Saddam Hussein fissionable Panama SEAL Team 6 bomb NSA arrangements Khaddafi $400 million in gold bullion Mossad Nazi pgpWH5qPuUY7f.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 03:36:54AM -0700, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, do we have a consensus? 2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib. All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if possable?^ | You of course ment 2.9, but everyone knew that, right ? :) Yes, *peers at himself* Any disaggreement? Nope, not from me... Ok, if I don't see any disagreement by midnight EST I'll submit a bug against ftp.debian.org, and start filing bug reports against packages which have not been recompiled in a week or so... Zephaniah E, Hull.. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( D | e | b | i | a | n ) Debian Certified Linux Developer \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ Surrey/B.C./Canada -- kibo KGB Peking Soviet Saddam Hussein fissionable Panama SEAL Team 6 bomb NSA arrangements Khaddafi $400 million in gold bullion Mossad Nazi pgpLto9v4McQT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
[Note: [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't work] On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without a -dev. Daniel Jacobowitz (drow) is working on this IIRC, Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on libstdc++2.8 recompiled for libstdc++2.9 . Ray -- POPULATION EXPLOSION Unique in human experience, an event which happened yesterday but which everyone swears won't happen until tomorrow. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Re: [warp@whitestar.soark.net] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
Ray == Ray J.H.M. writes: Ray Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on Ray libstdc++2.8 recompiled for libstdc++2.9 . Of course, of course, nobody's arguing that. APT will be recompiled for libstdc++2.9. However, commercial apps and apps that are not part of Debian will come linked to 2.8, and we should support that. -- Brought to you by the letters N and J and the number 15. Son, I am able, she said, though you scare me. -- They Might Be Giants Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/ I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
