Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Joey Hess ha escrit: mydms package now has been corrected and now depends on debconf | debconf-2.0. Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends debconf | \ grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends -v '| debconf-2.0' | \ dd-list --dctrl Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] bidentd Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] poker-network Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] amavis-ng courier debaux dhelp interchange pure-ftpd sympa Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailreader Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED] linesrv pointless Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gs-common gtktrain ndtpd Peter De Schrijver (p2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgcr410 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] posh Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-quotafolder OHASHI Akira [EMAIL PROTECTED] initz riece Jan Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-tl Pierre Ancelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] hwtools Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] bamboo Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipmasq Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ftpwatch Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] udftools Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila [EMAIL PROTECTED] flowscan Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifhp miscfiles Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] pango1.0 Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] diffmon Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] exult Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] colormake Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] gforge-theme-starterpack php4-mcrypt Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ckermit Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] jove nn Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] razzle Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] drupal mantis Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] joystick Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] lksctp-tools partimage Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-loginmanager Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] hinfo Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] durep shfs sl-modem Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] acidlab Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED] drbd Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] tpb Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] tgif James Bromberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] libapache-mod-backhand Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] yiff Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] kdrill Luis Bustamante [EMAIL PROTECTED] acct Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wu-ftpd Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] dnprogs lvm10 mopd Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-czech Emmanuel le Chevoir [EMAIL PROTECTED] icecast-server Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED] websvn Volker Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] synce-serial Ashley Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] bottlerocket David Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] libsafe Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] libraw1394 Carlo Contavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wipl Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] faqomatic Matthew Danish [EMAIL PROTECTED] oftpd Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-build Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] motion Vivek Dasmohapatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] dbishell Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org apache2 Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] scsitools xtel Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] darkstat Murat Demirten [EMAIL PROTECTED] ettercap Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] pimppa Sven Dowideit [EMAIL PROTECTED] twiki Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] lxdoom Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] dacode Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED] atftp backuppc swish-e Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] x-symbol Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ams Nick Estes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mserv Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuse Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz [EMAIL PROTECTED] gkdebconf Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED] chdrv Dimitri Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] smarty tutos2 Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] printbill Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] nagat phpqladmin roxen3 roxen4 Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] libnss-ldap
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is; and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious. What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed. Please see Debian policy. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is; and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious. What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed. Please see Debian policy. Or, more helpfully, please see section 3.10.1 of Debian policy. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P [-SNIP-] Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] joystick Thanks, I'll upload a package sometime later today. -- Edward -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not? It seemed a bit excessive to mail everyone just to get in touch with 286 maintainers. Also I like to encourage the proper use of debian-devel. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Hi, This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P It's not entirely clear from the posting, but all that's required on the maintainer part is to edit debian/control and change debconf to debconf | debconf-2.0 I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is; and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious. What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
* lunedì 26 settembre 2005, alle 19:57, Joey Hess scrive: Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Thank you Joey and sorry for that. I'll prepare my package, and I'll ask my sponsor to upload it ASAP (i'm a sponsored maintainer). -- Maurizio - Tannoiser - Lemmo Founder Member of ERLUG http://erlug.linux.it --- Joyce: They only don't have calories if I make them for you. Mom logic. --Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Bad Girls signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:57:23 +0200, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] aide This is fixed in experimental (dinstall on 2005-09-27), and will go to unstable in about a week once the package (which has suffered pretty big changes) has shown not to contain any howlers. Greetings Marc, co-maintainer -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber |Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG Rightful Heir | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Hi, Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way. This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because beauracracy is fun. I'm transitioning one of my packages to a potential new-maintainer; and it helps to have bug reports to transfer. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] flyspray fixed on yesterday. I missed your posts on d-devel. maybe a post on d-d-announce would have been more accurate given the number of concerned packages ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpZrD2eetfZh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 26/set/05, alle ore 19:57, Joey Hess ha scritto: Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED] libapache-mod-acct Fixed yesterday in 0.5-19. Regards, - -- Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDOT0D8ZumGJJMDCYRAgEiAJ43qv5GAz1Mnm4ZwNoi9OEUeAcr6gCcCD8f vNbZEEtvZrMZ09UCaKnkGTc= =bo+J -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-26 19:57]: Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not? So long, Alfie [doing his updates] P.S.: Yes, you are right. I ceaced to read debian-devel for quite a while due to the sheer mass of noise ratio. So Cc: me on replies that you think might be interesting to me, too. Honor the Mail-Followup-To: header. -- snowcrash ZZcd .. snowcrash oops -- #jutesack signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends debconf | \ grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends -v '| debconf-2.0' | \ dd-list --dctrl Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] bidentd Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] poker-network Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] amavis-ng courier debaux dhelp interchange pure-ftpd sympa Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailreader Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED] linesrv pointless Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gs-common gtktrain ndtpd Peter De Schrijver (p2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgcr410 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] posh Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-quotafolder OHASHI Akira [EMAIL PROTECTED] initz riece Jan Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-tl Pierre Ancelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] hwtools Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] bamboo Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipmasq Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ftpwatch Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] udftools Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila [EMAIL PROTECTED] flowscan Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifhp miscfiles Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] pango1.0 Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] diffmon Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] exult Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] colormake Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] gforge-theme-starterpack php4-mcrypt Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ckermit Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] jove nn Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] razzle Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] drupal mantis Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] joystick Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] lksctp-tools partimage Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-loginmanager Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] hinfo Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] durep shfs sl-modem Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] acidlab Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED] drbd Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] tpb Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] tgif James Bromberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] libapache-mod-backhand Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] yiff Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] kdrill Luis Bustamante [EMAIL PROTECTED] acct Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wu-ftpd Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] dnprogs lvm10 mopd Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-czech Emmanuel le Chevoir [EMAIL PROTECTED] icecast-server Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED] websvn Volker Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] synce-serial Ashley Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] bottlerocket David Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] libsafe Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] libraw1394 Carlo Contavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wipl Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] faqomatic Matthew Danish [EMAIL PROTECTED] oftpd Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-build Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] motion Vivek Dasmohapatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] dbishell Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org apache2 Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] scsitools xtel Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] darkstat Murat Demirten [EMAIL PROTECTED] ettercap Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] pimppa Sven Dowideit [EMAIL PROTECTED] twiki Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] lxdoom Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] dacode Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED] atftp backuppc swish-e Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] x-symbol Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ams Nick Estes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mserv Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuse Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz [EMAIL PROTECTED] gkdebconf Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED] chdrv Dimitri Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] smarty tutos2 Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] printbill Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] nagat phpqladmin roxen3 roxen4 Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] libnss-ldap libpam-ldap Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] abook beep GNU Libc Maintainers debian-glibc@lists.debian.org glibc Wilmer van der Gaast [EMAIL PROTECTED] bitlbee Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] mtink Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED] libapache-mod-acct Radovan Garabík [EMAIL PROTECTED] efingerd xtell Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] amanda dump Hector Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way. This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because beauracracy is fun. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way. This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because beauracracy is fun. No, it's because this is how I organize my work. I cannot do everything immediately; sometimes there are blocking bugs which impede doing the work right away, and sometimes there are other problems that arise in my life. I do not regard bug reports as an imposition, I regard them as a great help. I do not require pre-bug bug reports, where people report bugs before they report bugs, and then only report the bug if the already-reported bug isn't fixed without the report. Much simpler to adopt the strategy that when you see a bug, and you want it fixed, report it. That's the way to get it on my radar. That's the documented normal way. It's not bureaucracy, it's simple record keeping. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P This is the first time I see this. If it is a bug, then you have my blessing to file a bugreport. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Absolutely right. ;-) d-d is too busy. Thanks for the Bcc, but I would not have objected to a bug report. Also, I agree that a lintian/linda rule would be helpful here. -- Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Hi Joey, Paul Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] axyl axyl-lucene Now done, but not yet uploaded due to other changes in the works. I'm expecting I will get them both uploaded inside two weeks - is that a good enough timescale for you? Cheers, Paul.
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess schrieb: Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. [..] Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] lksctp-tools partimage Updated packages (lksctp-tools_1.0.3-3/partimage_0.6.4-14) are ready and waiting for an upload by my sponsor. Cheers, Michael -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.teco.edu/ TecO (Telecooperation Office) Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str.1 University of Karlsruhe 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Thanks Joey - you're absolutely correct: I don't have the leisure to follow debian-devel, nor do many, so it seems a little precipitate to be firing out three warnings without taking the approach that you have for this one... Andrew McMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] whereami Fixed now, and will upload in a few hours. Regards, Andrew McMillan. - Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St DDI: +64(4)803-2201 MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267 The secret of being a bore is to say everything -- Voltaire - signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote: This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Yep, debian-devel is not high on my list right now. Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] amanda dump Change made to both packages in my CVS for the next upload. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess wrote: This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org apache2 apache2 will be fixed when 2.0.55 is released upstream and I upload it to sid (which is due to happen any day now). I didn't see the point in an upload just to fix this issue. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Hello On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. (Original post here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P Thanks for the BCC. As you have understood I do not read debian-devel every day and I miss a lot of postings. :) All the packages should have been fixed now. Regards, // Ola apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends debconf | \ grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends -v '| debconf-2.0' | \ dd-list --dctrl Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] bidentd Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] poker-network Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] amavis-ng courier debaux dhelp interchange pure-ftpd sympa Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailreader Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED] linesrv pointless Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gs-common gtktrain ndtpd Peter De Schrijver (p2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgcr410 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] posh Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-quotafolder OHASHI Akira [EMAIL PROTECTED] initz riece Jan Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-tl Pierre Ancelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] hwtools Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] bamboo Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipmasq Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ftpwatch Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] udftools Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila [EMAIL PROTECTED] flowscan Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifhp miscfiles Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] pango1.0 Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] diffmon Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] exult Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] colormake Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] gforge-theme-starterpack php4-mcrypt Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ckermit Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] jove nn Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] razzle Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] drupal mantis Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] joystick Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] lksctp-tools partimage Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-loginmanager Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] hinfo Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] durep shfs sl-modem Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] acidlab Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED] drbd Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] tpb Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] tgif James Bromberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] libapache-mod-backhand Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] yiff Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] kdrill Luis Bustamante [EMAIL PROTECTED] acct Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wu-ftpd Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] dnprogs lvm10 mopd Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-czech Emmanuel le Chevoir [EMAIL PROTECTED] icecast-server Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED] websvn Volker Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] synce-serial Ashley Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] bottlerocket David Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] libsafe Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] libraw1394 Carlo Contavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wipl Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] faqomatic Matthew Danish [EMAIL PROTECTED] oftpd Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-build Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] motion Vivek Dasmohapatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] dbishell Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org apache2 Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] scsitools xtel Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] darkstat Murat Demirten [EMAIL PROTECTED] ettercap Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] pimppa Sven Dowideit [EMAIL PROTECTED] twiki Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] lxdoom Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] dacode Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED] atftp backuppc swish-e Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] x-symbol Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ams Nick Estes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mserv Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuse Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz [EMAIL PROTECTED] gkdebconf Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED] chdrv Dimitri Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] smarty tutos2 Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] printbill Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] nagat
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Quoting Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of this? Hmmm, apologies (public...just like apologies have to be). This was intended to be a private reply, but it seems that my fingers are more used to the L key. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. [snip] Morten Werner Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] slbackup This is fixed in 0.0.8-1. - Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] geneweb Fixed in 4.10-10 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess wrote: | debconf-2.0 dput Thanks for the reminder. Fixed in 0.9.2.20. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of this? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:27 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first mail at the beginning of the month. Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] portsentry Done; Thanks -- Bruno Barrera C. The Pegasus Group Company - http://www.tpgcompany.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. [..] Debian Hamradio Maintainers debian-hams@lists.debian.org ax25-apps Fixed. Thanks. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:27:12 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-data clamav-getfiles Upload of fixed packages pending current unstable versions migrating to testing. ETA: Monday. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber |Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG Rightful Heir | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:28:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: spellcast Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends Version: 1.0-19 Depends: debconf, gettext, libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0) ^^^ /me puts a brown paper bag on Should be fixed in 1.0-20... in the upload queue now. Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 bugs. Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first mail at the beginning of the month. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends debconf \ |grep-dctrl -FDepends -v '| debconf-2.0' | grep ^Package: \ | cut -d : -f 2 | dd-list --stdin Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] bidentd Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] poker-network Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] amavis-ng courier debaux dhelp interchange pure-ftpd sympa Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailreader Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gs-common gtktrain ndtpd Peter De Schrijver (p2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgcr410 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] posh zsh Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-quotafolder OHASHI Akira [EMAIL PROTECTED] initz riece Jan Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-tl Pierre Ancelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] hwtools Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] bamboo Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ftpwatch Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] udftools Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila [EMAIL PROTECTED] flowscan Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] tilp Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] miscfiles Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] pango1.0 Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] diffmon Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] exult Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] colormake Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] gforge-theme-starterpack php4-mcrypt Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] jove nn Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] razzle Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] drupal mantis Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] joystick Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] lksctp-tools partimage Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] zope-loginmanager Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] durep shfs sl-modem Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] acidlab Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED] drbd Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] tpb Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] tgif James Bromberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] libapache-mod-backhand Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] kdrill Luis Bustamante [EMAIL PROTECTED] acct Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wu-ftpd Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] portsentry Rubén Porras Campo [EMAIL PROTECTED] manpages-es Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] dnprogs lvm10 mopd Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-czech Emmanuel le Chevoir [EMAIL PROTECTED] xsmbrowser Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED] websvn Volker Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] synce-serial Ashley Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] bottlerocket David Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] libsafe Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] libraw1394 Carlo Contavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wipl Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] faqomatic Matthew Danish [EMAIL PROTECTED] oftpd Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-build Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] motion Vivek Dasmohapatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] dbishell Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org apache apache2 Debian Edu Developers debian-edu@lists.debian.org debian-edu-install Debian Hamradio Maintainers debian-hams@lists.debian.org ax25-apps Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org ocaml-tools Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org kdenetwork Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] scsitools xtel Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] darkstat Murat Demirten [EMAIL PROTECTED] ettercap Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] pimppa Agustin Martin Domingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] dictionaries-common eo-spell espa-nol ispell-gl wspanish Sven Dowideit [EMAIL PROTECTED] twiki Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] lxdoom Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] dacode Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED] atftp backuppc swish-e Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] x-symbol Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ams Nick Estes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mserv Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuse Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz [EMAIL PROTECTED] gkdebconf Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED] chdrv iterm Dimitri Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] smarty tutos tutos2 Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] printbill Philipp Frauenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] calamaris Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] nagat phpqladmin roxen3 roxen4 Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] libnss-ldap libpam-ldap Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] abook beep GNU Libc Maintainers debian-glibc@lists.debian.org glibc Wilmer van der Gaast [EMAIL PROTECTED] bitlbee Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first mail at the beginning of the month. (...) Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] nessus-plugins Forgot to fix this one, will upload 2.2.5-3 right away to fix it there. samhain Samhain 2.0.9-1 fixes this issue and was uploaded Aug 29th. spellcast Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore. It seems that you did not run an 'apt-get update' before rerunning the shell snippet you provided? (thanks for it BTW, very ilustrative to see how you generated the listing). Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
* Joey Hess schrieb am 31.08.05, um 22:27 Uhr: Debian VDR Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] nvram-wakeup Fixed package was uploaded a few minutes ago. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Schmidt, Debian VDR Team http://pkg-vdr-dvb.alioth.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RE: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Achilleas Kotsis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ulogd Fixed localy, will upload soon (due to sponsored upload) Achilleas Kotsis a.k.a. Achille -- whois awk?, sed Grep -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends debconf \ |grep-dctrl -FDepends -v '| debconf-2.0' | grep ^Package: \ | cut -d : -f 2 | dd-list --stdin Assuming a sid grep-dctrl, grep-aptavail -FDepends debconf -a -! -FDepends '| debconf-2.0' \ -sPackage -n | dd-list --stdin :) (Sarge's grep-dctrl would need the apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl start.) (Could be much faster if dd-list accepted input in the format output by -sPackage,Maintainer.) -- Antti-Juhani signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess wrote: ... Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] cvs nas seyon New versions of all three uploaded tonight to fix this... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Because heaters aren't purple! -- Catherine Pitt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: spellcast Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends Version: 1.0-19 Depends: debconf, gettext, libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0) ^^^ -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] crossfire 1.8.0-1 does not use debconf anymore. Still looking for a sponsor for the upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to replace debconf. [...] Nicolas Duboc [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamprobe Fixed in latest upload (1.2a-1). Thanks, -- Nicolas Duboc [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpdwtMM3deHF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 17:08 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the upgrade). So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix. I won't have time for either until next weekend. The debconf dependency is now removed from xpilot, as it is now just a transition package to upgrade to xpilot-ng, which doesn't have the dependency either. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] phpbb2 For the curious: fixed in svn, will be included in next upload. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2005-08-02 18:46 -0400]: I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to replace debconf. [...] Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] fwanalog A new version which fixes the problem is sitting in incoming. ciao, ema signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess uttered xringd Fixed package in unstable as of a few days ago. Cheers, -- Steve C offers you enough rope to hang yourself. C++ offers a fully equipped firing squad, a last cigarette and a blindfold. - Erik de Castro Lopo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess wrote: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] fprobe-ng fprobe-ulog xmail Since everybody is providing feedback... I will prepare new packages tommorow and ask my sponsors to upload them. Radu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to replace debconf. Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] blootbot Fixed. Neil -- __ .Ž `. [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' ! `. `Ž gpg: B345BDD3 `- Please don't cc, I'm subscribed to the list signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Ok, since everybody is reporting back here I will do the same: On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: checksecurity euro-support remem Done and uploaded. samhain snort I will submit new upstream versions of these when time permits and will fix this in those uploads. spellcast Removed debconf note, thus, no dependencies. tiger user-es Both done and uploaded. That's it. Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
because everyone else is doing it... On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] cacti cacti-cactid sugarplum all three have now been uploaded with proper dependencies. sean -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote: debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper. Hmmm, I'm using dh_installdebconf in all my packages but there is no such thing as adding something to the dependencies. Did I missed something? on debconf without a | debconf-2.0. If your package is on this list, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] arb I expect new upstream soon and will change with new upload. cdd Changed in CVS. pcd2html Fixed. zope-epoz Fixed. zope-extfile zope-textindexng2 Need to sort out issues with general zope packaging - packages in preparation. Hmm, there are also a few packages that depend on debconf | debconf-2.0, ..., debconf, but I don't have a good regex to catch those yet and am unsure how dpkg handles them anyway. BTW, why isn't there a lintian check which reports this problem? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Hi. On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00:46, Joey Hess wrote: Juan Manuel Garcia Molina [EMAIL PROTECTED] facturalux Fixed locally, it will be included in next upload. moodle-book I have just uploaded a package with the correction included. Regards, Juanma. -- Juan Manuel Garcia Molina Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org pgpVry9tjLZHW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.
Hmmm, I'm using dh_installdebconf in all my packages but there is
no such thing as adding something to the dependencies. Did I missed
something?
${misc:Depends} will add the appropriate dependency; use it rather than
an explicit debconf dependency.
BTW, why isn't there a lintian check which reports this problem?
Probably just because no one has written one yet. :)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.
Hmmm, I'm using dh_installdebconf in all my packages but there is
no such thing as adding something to the dependencies. Did I missed
something?
${misc:Depends} will add the appropriate dependency; use it rather than
an explicit debconf dependency.
Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some
Zope products. I tried to replace the debconf dependency according
to your suggestion, but the resulting Debian package did not
depend from debconf.
It might be the reason that in fact it is clear that the package
implicitely depends from debconf if it depends from the package
that contains the shared question (zope). I for myself feeled
safer to add the explicite debconf dependency. Am I wrong here?
Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to
be clever enough to ignore the lines
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_get shared/zope/restart || true
in the postinst file because the package depends from a package
that just depends from debconf?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
An, 2005 08 02 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess rašė: Kęstutis Biliūnas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ispell-lt Fixed and the new package is in incoming now. -- Kęstutis Biliūnas [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] xpilot I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the upgrade). So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix. I won't have time for either until next weekend. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] xpilot I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the upgrade). So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix. I won't have time for either until next weekend. Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot? If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Debian Adduser Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] adduser Fixed version in svn, will be uploaded when the current unstable versio has migrated to testing. Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-data clamav-getfiles clamav-data and clamav-getfiles will be overhauled in late august. I would like to postpone the (easy) fix until then. snoopy Fixed version uploaded today. Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] aide A patch is in the BTS. I am co-maintainer for aide, and I have asked Mike for his opinion regarding some other easily fixed bugs. I expect an upload in the next ten to 14 days. See also: http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/126-My-packages-cdebconf-blockers.html Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber |Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG Rightful Heir | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:13 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot? If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion. I'm still holding out for the remote chance upstream might deliver on their promise to release an XPilot 5, which would then offer some features XPilot-ng doesn't. With that in mind, I included -ng in all filepaths and the package names so they won't conflict. While it is still possible they might release xpilot++ (the working name for XPilot 5, since they've translated it to C++) which would then become the next version of the current xpilot package, so long as 4.5.5 remains in the current state of disrepair, I feel it is better to have users upgrade to xpilot-ng. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to be clever enough to ignore the lines . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule db_get shared/zope/restart || true in the postinst file because the package depends from a package that just depends from debconf? Well, I am not sure it is a good idea to resolv the dependencies that way. Each package should declare all its dependencies directly. (And only its own) Gruss Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
products. I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your
suggestion, but the resulting Debian package did not depend from
debconf.
Ah, yes, if you don't ship debconf templates with the package and just use
results saved by other packages, dh_installdebconf doesn't know to include
the dependency in ${misc:Depends} and you have to do it manually.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:32:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
products. I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your
suggestion, but the resulting Debian package did not depend from
debconf.
Ah, yes, if you don't ship debconf templates with the package and just use
results saved by other packages, dh_installdebconf doesn't know to include
the dependency in ${misc:Depends} and you have to do it manually.
Yes, although including a .config maintainer script would work too.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) writes: Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] localepurge The next upload will contain the correction. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
* Joey Hess [Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400]: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org kdebase kdenetwork Fixed in SVN, will be in the next upload. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Old men are fond of giving good advice to console themselves for their inability to set a bad example. -- La Rochefoucauld, Maxims -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00.46, Joey Hess wrote: [debconf dance] Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] postgrey tags +pending (fixed in svn) I hear a new upstream version is in the works, so I'll wait a week or two before uploading. cheers -- vbi -- featured product: SpamAssassin - http://spamassassin.org pgpNqPg2Ppqrz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Hi, * Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-03 00:46]: |libphp-adodb fixed and uploaded. Regards, Thorsten -- Thorsten Sauter [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: [...] Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] cpufreqd fixed and uploaded. -- mattia :wq! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]: On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote: I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database. You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid' and 'testing' development). Otherwise, you'll have to suffer then for a while yet. No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make the code only to run if there is debconf installed. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005, Andreas Barth wrote: * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]: On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote: I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database. You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid' and 'testing' development). Otherwise, you'll have to suffer then for a while yet. No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make the code only to run if there is debconf installed. Good call. I thought Julien meant removing the purge old stuff from the database, and not just the dependency. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make the code only to run if there is debconf installed. Good call. I thought Julien meant removing the purge old stuff from the database, and not just the dependency. Yes, indeed. One of the 2 packages got released in Woody with the debconf stuff, so I'll go with Andreas' solution for this one. For the other one, I've just dropped debconf entirely. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] cdtool The debconf question will be dropped in next upload. It asks about the /dev/cdrom symlink that is created elsewhere nowadays. cheers, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Joey, Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] sane-backends tilp I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote: I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database. You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid' and 'testing' development). Otherwise, you'll have to suffer then for a while yet. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The A mail to d-d-a would probably be a good idea in any case - I can't be the only person who's never heard of decconf-2.0 before. -- You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-listchanges cricket flac I have no idea how or why flac ended up with a debconf dependency; it doesn't use it. I've removed it in CVS for my next upload; no bug is necessary. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
