On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > xpilot > > I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I > finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and > plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old > xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the > upgrade). > > So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent > replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and > NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix. I won't have time for either > until next weekend.
Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot? If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]