Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:32:27PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell wrote: > > Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in > > the debian/control file? > > > > Package: ntp > > Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) > > Depends: ... > > No, but "linux-any kfreebsd-any" might work. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-customized-programs.html#s-arch-wildcard-spec -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110610140958.gp17...@glenfiddich.mraw.org
Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell wrote: > Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in > the debian/control file? > > Package: ntp > Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) > Depends: ... No, but "linux-any kfreebsd-any" might work. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrniv477b.vv2.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 13:10 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Svante Signell writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > > source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override > > statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries of that binary > > package in debian/rules, useful? Any other way to do this, by > > architecture checks? The Architecture entry seems to be all or any only, > > and Depends does not fit either. > > > > Thanks! > > The architecture can be just some archs too. But that is often something > the rules file then has to take into consideration too. If you have a > source that builds part of its packages only on some arch then this is > your answere. Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in the debian/control file? Package: ntp Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) Depends: ... Package: ntpdate Architecture: any ... Package: ntp-doc Architecture: all ... And then change the corresponding parts of debian/rules? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1307708053.22466.181.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
Svante Signell writes: > Hi, > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override > statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries of that binary > package in debian/rules, useful? Any other way to do this, by > architecture checks? The Architecture entry seems to be all or any only, > and Depends does not fit either. > > Thanks! The architecture can be just some archs too. But that is often something the rules file then has to take into consideration too. If you have a source that builds part of its packages only on some arch then this is your answere. Otherwise you will be out of luck. Happy editing. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d3imlz6b.fsf@frosties.localnet
Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
Hi, Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries of that binary package in debian/rules, useful? Any other way to do this, by architecture checks? The Architecture entry seems to be all or any only, and Depends does not fit either. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1307660729.3782.12.ca...@hp.my.own.domain
