Re: Bug#88429: Bug should be closed?
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:54:09 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In glibc-doc (2.3.1-6), the tags now look like: TITLEThe GNU C Library: Introduction/TITLE Furthermore, 'grep Untitled /usr/share/doc/glibc-doc/html/*' turns up nothing. So I propose this bug be closed. Thanks for your indication! I fixed it in 2.3.1-1 with Bug#159417, but I forgot to follow it up... I close this bug. -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't been able to reproduce it yet. Chances are it's not a bug. :-) Yes :-) It's time to close this bug. -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500,
H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch that re-words the description in the info file to
document the additional requirement that umount() can only take the mount
point, not the mount device, as argument.
--- sysinfo.texi.ORIG 2002-12-27 12:03:57.0 -0500
+++ sysinfo.texi 2002-12-27 12:06:46.0 -0500
@@ -1048,7 +1048,9 @@
@deftypefun {int} umount (const char *@var{file})
@code{umount} does the same thing as @code{umount2} with @var{flags} set
-to zeroes. It is more widely available than @code{umount2} but since it
+to zeroes, with the additional requirement that @var{file} must be the
+mount point, not the device special file.
+It is more widely available than @code{umount2} but since it
lacks the possibility to forcefully unmount a filesystem is deprecated
when @code{umount2} is also available.
@end deftypefun
Thanks for your patch.
BTW, from manpages umount(2):
HISTORY
The original umount function was called as umount(device) and would
return ENOTBLK when called with something other than a block device.
In Linux 0.98p4 a call umount(dir) was added, in order to support
anonymous devices. In Linux 2.3.99-pre7 the call umount(device) was
removed, leaving only umount(dir) (since now devices can be mounted in
more than one place, so specifying the device does not suffice).
So... this description is true after 2.4 iff its kernel is linux, if
this manpage is correct. I think this description depends on your
kernel. It's kernel issue, not glibc issue. I wonder this bug has
the right point.
IMHO, this bug can be closed without any patches. I want more
suggestions about it.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#86220: marked as done (uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2001 19:48:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 13:48:48 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail3.aracnet.com [:::216.99.193.38] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14Tqs3-0007xm-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:48:47 -0600 Received: from charon.menefee (dyn-d082f5b3.spiritone.com [208.130.245.179]) by mail3.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1GJmgb14949; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:43 -0800 Received: from troglodyte ([192.168.192.3] helo=troglodyte.menefee ident=mail) by charon.menefee with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14Tqrw-0001JY-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:40 -0800 Received: from kevint by troglodyte.menefee with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14Tqrr-0004CT-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:35 -0800 From: Kevin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work X-Reportbug-Version: 1.13 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.13 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:32 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Kevin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: dpkg Version: 1.8.3.1 Severity: normal Ok, I'm looking at the source, and I'm seeing that you've got a tolower in main/configure.c:deferred_configure(), but I'm telling you, uppercase reponses just aren't working for me here. Which wouldn't be such a big deal, except that the prompt is all written in uppercase letters. (This is in response to the File on system created by you or by a script... question.) -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux troglodyte 2.4.1-pre12 #1 Tue Feb 13 15:49:08 PST 2001 i586 Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii libc6 2.2.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.0-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.3-5 The GNU stdc++ library ii sysvinit 2.78-4 System-V like init. --- Received: (at 86220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 03:26:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 29 21:26:14 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SqZC-0003PR-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:26:14 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6668C33C1; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug In-Reply-To: 20021227180004.GA29411@crystal References: 20021227180004.GA29411@crystal User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't been able to reproduce it yet. Chances are it's not a bug. :-) Yes :-) It's time to close this bug. -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug needs better title
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 104173 math.h prototypes missing when _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 Bug#104173: libc6 Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign so that all the named packages exist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 31664 libc6-dev, glibc-doc, manpages-dev, autoconf Bug#31664: _GNU_SOURCE required by libc Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev, libc6-doc, manpages-dev, autoconf' to `libc6-dev, glibc-doc, manpages-dev, autoconf'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: Bug#88429: Bug should be closed?
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:54:09 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In glibc-doc (2.3.1-6), the tags now look like: TITLEThe GNU C Library: Introduction/TITLE Furthermore, 'grep Untitled /usr/share/doc/glibc-doc/html/*' turns up nothing. So I propose this bug be closed. Thanks for your indication! I fixed it in 2.3.1-1 with Bug#159417, but I forgot to follow it up... I close this bug. -- gotom
Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't been able to reproduce it yet. Chances are it's not a bug. :-) Yes :-) It's time to close this bug. -- gotom
Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500,
H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch that re-words the description in the info file to
document the additional requirement that umount() can only take the mount
point, not the mount device, as argument.
--- sysinfo.texi.ORIG 2002-12-27 12:03:57.0 -0500
+++ sysinfo.texi 2002-12-27 12:06:46.0 -0500
@@ -1048,7 +1048,9 @@
@deftypefun {int} umount (const char [EMAIL PROTECTED])
@code{umount} does the same thing as @code{umount2} with @var{flags} set
-to zeroes. It is more widely available than @code{umount2} but since it
+to zeroes, with the additional requirement that @var{file} must be the
+mount point, not the device special file.
+It is more widely available than @code{umount2} but since it
lacks the possibility to forcefully unmount a filesystem is deprecated
when @code{umount2} is also available.
@end deftypefun
Thanks for your patch.
BTW, from manpages umount(2):
HISTORY
The original umount function was called as umount(device) and would
return ENOTBLK when called with something other than a block device.
In Linux 0.98p4 a call umount(dir) was added, in order to support
anonymous devices. In Linux 2.3.99-pre7 the call umount(device) was
removed, leaving only umount(dir) (since now devices can be mounted in
more than one place, so specifying the device does not suffice).
So... this description is true after 2.4 iff its kernel is linux, if
this manpage is correct. I think this description depends on your
kernel. It's kernel issue, not glibc issue. I wonder this bug has
the right point.
IMHO, this bug can be closed without any patches. I want more
suggestions about it.
Regards,
-- gotom
Bug#86220: marked as done (uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2001 19:48:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 13:48:48 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail3.aracnet.com [:::216.99.193.38] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14Tqs3-0007xm-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:48:47 -0600 Received: from charon.menefee (dyn-d082f5b3.spiritone.com [208.130.245.179]) by mail3.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1GJmgb14949; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:43 -0800 Received: from troglodyte ([192.168.192.3] helo=troglodyte.menefee ident=mail) by charon.menefee with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14Tqrw-0001JY-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:40 -0800 Received: from kevint by troglodyte.menefee with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14Tqrr-0004CT-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:35 -0800 From: Kevin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work X-Reportbug-Version: 1.13 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.13 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:32 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Kevin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: dpkg Version: 1.8.3.1 Severity: normal Ok, I'm looking at the source, and I'm seeing that you've got a tolower in main/configure.c:deferred_configure(), but I'm telling you, uppercase reponses just aren't working for me here. Which wouldn't be such a big deal, except that the prompt is all written in uppercase letters. (This is in response to the File on system created by you or by a script... question.) -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux troglodyte 2.4.1-pre12 #1 Tue Feb 13 15:49:08 PST 2001 i586 Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii libc6 2.2.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.0-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.3-5 The GNU stdc++ library ii sysvinit 2.78-4 System-V like init. --- Received: (at 86220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 03:26:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 29 21:26:14 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SqZC-0003PR-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:26:14 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6668C33C1; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-glibc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't been able to reproduce it yet. Chances are it's not a bug. :-) Yes :-) It's time to close this bug. -- gotom
Bug#88429: marked as done (glibc-doc: Bad titles on HTML docs)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:23:11 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#88429: Bug should be closed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2001 05:36:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 03 23:36:39 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vitelus.com [:::64.81.36.147] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14ZRCB-0006jn-00; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:36:39 -0600 Received: from aaronl by vitelus.com with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14ZRCA-i9-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 21:36:38 -0800 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:36:38 -0800 From: Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS Submissions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: glibc-doc: Bad titles on HTML docs Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: glibc-doc Version: 2.2.1-1 The HTML documentation has title tags like: TITLEUntitled Document: Introduction/TITLE The Untitled Document text seems to be an error. Can it be removed or replaced with something such as glibc reference? --- Received: (at 88429-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 03:23:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 29 21:23:13 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SqWG-0003HJ-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:23:13 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88242C33C1; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:23:11 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:23:11 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-glibc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#88429: Bug should be closed? In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03, USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:54:09 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In glibc-doc (2.3.1-6), the tags now look like: TITLEThe GNU C Library: Introduction/TITLE Furthermore, 'grep Untitled /usr/share/doc/glibc-doc/html/*' turns up nothing. So I propose this bug be closed. Thanks for your indication! I fixed it in 2.3.1-1 with Bug#159417, but I forgot to follow it up... I close this bug. -- gotom
