Re: last-align: Baseline violation on amd64?

[Michael Crusoe]

Hey Nilesh.

Thanks for thinking about this. SSE2 is part of the amd64 baseline, so it
is fine.

I guess we could adjust that d/rules to more clearly make a `-plain` on
both amd64 & i386. It is a bit out of date from the style I have been using
more recently.

So you could update it, but there is no error nor any urgency.

Cheers,

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 15:46, Nilesh Patra  wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Whilst compiling last-align for new upstream release, I noticed that
> last-align binaries are not being generated for baseline amd64, i.e.
> without sse/avx et. al. More specifically, there's no instruction to
> build the "-plain" binaries while the same is actually present for
> i386[1]
> So is this a baseline violation? If yes, should we immediately fix it?
>
> [1]:
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/last-align/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L49
> [2]:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=last-align=amd64=1179-1%2Bb1=1615505159=0
>
> Nilesh
>


-- 
Michael R. Crusoe
Co-founder & Lead,
Common Workflow Language project 
https://orcid.org/-0002-2961-9670
m...@commonwl.org

last-align: Baseline violation on amd64?

[Nilesh Patra]

Hi Michael,

Whilst compiling last-align for new upstream release, I noticed that
last-align binaries are not being generated for baseline amd64, i.e.
without sse/avx et. al. More specifically, there's no instruction to
build the "-plain" binaries while the same is actually present for
i386[1]
So is this a baseline violation? If yes, should we immediately fix it?

[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/last-align/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L49
[2]: 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=last-align=amd64=1179-1%2Bb1=1615505159=0

Nilesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature