Re: RFS: Many php-* packages to be updated: php-auth-http php-compat php-config php-crypt-cbc php-event-dispatcher php-html-common php-html-select php-image-barcode php-net-ping php-net-portscan php-x
Gregory Colpart wrote: Hello, On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:41:11PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: I knew them, and used them a lot in the past, but as I am doing the packaging using pear install and some rm, I thought it would be more consistent like this. Anyway, this is changed and now using dh_installdocs and dh_installexamples instead, but of course, the rest is still using pear install. If it was a problem, then php-net-ipv4 has it too (which was the example I took). I could have as well called pear install in a temporary build folder, and call dh_install later on, but I thought it was a bit too much. Let me know what you think about this. I maintain 3 pear-module packages in pkg-php repository and I begin to documente my way to package/to use SVN: http://wiki.debian.org/GregoryColpart/PkgPhpPearSVN Why did you choose SVN? It's not any better than CVS, it has the same lacks, like not being able to manage unix rights, which is really the basic. Why don't you upgrade to Git or Mercurial which are REALLY a LOT better? The very big advantage of Git is that everybody can have it's own public repository and just send you the URL so you can pull from it. I plan to improve Requirements for PHP PEAR libraries[*] to have a common policy for all PHP PEAR modules (common packaging, short/long description, procedures to request a new PHP PEAR module package or updating) in order to facilitate team maintainance and have high-quality and uptodate PHP PEAR packages. [*] http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft-php/html/ch-php-libs.html#s-php-libs-pear This is a VERY good idea, and I think it will help a lot to improve the pear package. Thanks for writing this. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: Many php-* packages to be updated: php-auth-http php-compat php-config php-crypt-cbc php-event-dispatcher php-html-common php-html-select php-image-barcode php-net-ping php-net-portscan php-x
On Wednesday 8 August 2007 08:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: Why did you choose SVN? It's not any better than CVS, it has the same lacks, like not being able to manage unix rights, which is really the basic. Why don't you upgrade to Git or Mercurial which are REALLY a LOT better? Not wanting to get into such a religious discussion, I do think I can correct two things here: saying it's not any better than CVS is untrue, because SVN is (apart from a few details) a feature superset of CVS. It's strictly better, it does what CVS does and it does more (better branching, global revision numbers, file renaming/copying, ...). It manages UNIX rights not in detail but you can set files executable, which I think is the major usecase for UNIX rights in packaging. I'm not sure what other rights you'd need when packaging something, as everything will be reset in the .diff anyway. I plan to improve Requirements for PHP PEAR libraries[*] to have a common policy for all PHP PEAR modules (common packaging, short/long description, procedures to request a new PHP PEAR module package or updating) in order to facilitate team maintainance and have high-quality and uptodate PHP PEAR packages. [*] http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft-php/html/ch-php-libs.html#s -php-libs-pear This is a VERY good idea, and I think it will help a lot to improve the pear package. Thanks for writing this. I currently maintain some PEAR packages and would be interested in joining such a group. Can you add me to the Alioth group please? My login is 'thijs'. Thanks, Thijs pgpORGKPSqrQL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Help with wrong upload
Hello, Could some mentors help me here?! I uploaded tex4ht version 20070717-1 to ftp-master.debian.org. Unfortunately, a couple of typos slipped in which make this package un-installable. I have now prepared a fixed version 20070717-2 which has been checked really properly (this time!) and uploaded. I want to avoid over-loading the mirrors because of 20070717-1 being propagated. Searching through various documentation I couldn't figure out whether there is some way I can do this. Is it enough to upload 20070717-2? Thanks and regards. Kapil. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with wrong upload
On Wednesday 8 August 2007 12:35, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: I want to avoid over-loading the mirrors because of 20070717-1 being propagated. Searching through various documentation I couldn't figure out whether there is some way I can do this. Is it enough to upload 20070717-2? Yes, it is. -1 has been propagated to the mirrors already at the most recent mirror pulse, but -2 will follow tonight. Only people whose mirror has been fully updated and have upgraded their system between now and tonight will have the -1 version. Nothing to do about that. Anyone who upgrades after tonight will have the -2 version, and the -1 version will be gone as soon as the next mirror pulse happens. There's always but one solution to a buggy upload that you already have an ACCEPTED mail for: upload a new version. Thijs pgp7I01Qsy2Q3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager
Hi Mentors, No one interested in sponsoring this package? :) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-phone-manager/gnome-phone-manager_0.8+svn20070729-2.dsc Best Regards, francesco Il giorno dom, 29/07/2007 alle 23.04 +0200, Francesco Namuri ha scritto: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-phone-manager. Package name: gnome-phone-manager Version : 0.8+svn20070729-1 Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://live.gnome.org/PhoneManager License : GPL Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gnome-phone-manager - control aspects of your mobile phone from your GNOME 2 desktop The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 401171 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-phone-manager - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-phone-manager/gnome-phone-manager_0.8+svn20070729-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Francesco Namuri -- Francesco Namuri francesco(at)namuri(dot)it http://namuri.it/ id gpg key: 21A4702A [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
RFS: qttube
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qttube. * Package name: qttube Version : 0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1 Upstream Author : Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (me) * URL : http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QtTube * License : GPLv2 Section : x11 It builds these binary packages: qttube - graphical application to download videos from YouTube The package appears to be lintian clean, except for this messages (checking the .deb): - E: qttube: postinst-does-not-call-updatemenus usr/share/menu/qttube - E: qttube: postrm-does-not-call-updatemenus usr/share/menu/qttube However, qttube.postinst.debhelper and qttube.postrm.debhelper files are generated during build and both call update-menus, so I don't know what the problem is. The upload would fix these bugs: 436659 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me, or helps me on how to improve it it further if it has any problem. Kind regards Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:11:57 +0200 Francesco Namuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mentors, No one interested in sponsoring this package? :) Package name: gnome-phone-manager Version : 0.8+svn20070729-1 I've done what I can to check it but I can't get my Motorola E1 to work with it so I haven't been able to test. (Bluetooth problems). It looks OK otherwise. If nobody else is able to pick this up, I'll look at it again at the weekend. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpDHiQt5GrKt.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: libfile-read-perl
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libfile-read-perl. * Package name: libfile-read-perl Version : 0.0602-1 Upstream Author : Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Read/ * License : Perl Section : perl It builds these binary packages: libfile-read-perl - Unique interface for reading one or more files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 382380 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libfile-read-perl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libfile-read-perl/libfile-read-perl_0.0602-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Deepak Tripathi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mini-dinstall, repository signing and apt-get authentication
Hi, Long before I heard about reprepro, I also wrote my own Python script to manage my local and remote Debian repositories (and I'm still using it): http://people.debian.org/~frn/fmdr documented at: http://people.debian.org/~frn/fmdr.txt To follow the pattern on http://wiki.debian.org/HowToSetupADebianRepository, it has these features: Automatic repositories: Yes Incoming mechanism: not sure what this means; to upload a package, you need to pass a .changes file to the --add option. Pools: Yes GPG signing: Yes HTH. -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: grub-choose-default
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package grub-choose-default. * Package name: grub-choose-default Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : David Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://cs.unm.edu/~dmohr/grub.php * License : GPL v2 Section : admin grub-choose-default gives you a GUI that you can use to easily select the next default for grub and you can go and grab a snack while your computer reboots without having to wait for anything. (taken from upstream website). It is written in python using python-tk. It builds these binary packages: grub-choose-default - Control Grub Default through a GUI The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 436192 (the ITP bug) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grub-choose-default - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grub-choose-default/grub-choose-default_0.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Kjell Braden signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qttube
Hi,
Siegfried-Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean, except for this messages
(checking the .deb):
- E: qttube: postinst-does-not-call-updatemenus usr/share/menu/qttube
- E: qttube: postrm-does-not-call-updatemenus usr/share/menu/qttube
However, qttube.postinst.debhelper and qttube.postrm.debhelper files
are generated during build and both call update-menus, so I don't know
what the problem is.
Maybe your qttube.post{inst,rm} are missing the #DEBHELPER# line?
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc
% dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc
dget: retrieving
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc
--18:10:02--
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc
= `qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc'
Resolving mentors.debian.net... 85.214.70.36
Connecting to mentors.debian.net|85.214.70.36|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
18:10:02 ERROR 404: Not Found.
dget: wget qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-0ubuntu1.dsc
failed
/tmp %
Hmmm.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: qttube
Hi again,
Sorry, the files had wrong versioning (-0ubuntu1) and I corrected
that. You can dget it from here now:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-1.dsc
2007/8/8, Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe your qttube.post{inst,rm} are missing the #DEBHELPER# line?
If it isn't clear in my last message, it's debhelper who generates
that files during the build.
Thanks for looking at it,
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Linux User #438657. Ubuntu User #11680.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggests vs. Recommends
Hello 'packagesearch' is a package which uses a plugin architecture. Each plugin provides a way to search for packages, e.g. doing a full text search, searching by filenames or orphaned packages. All plugins are shipped together with the main application in a single package. However, most of the plugins require some additional packages to work (e.g. apt-file or deborphan). If the packages are not available, the plugin will detect that, inform the user how he could install the package and disable itself. I would do this on a case by case basis: recommend some of the core plugins that do not need additional packages, so that the framework normally ships with some plugins that work, but even those can be removed without removing the framework; and suggesting the other plugins, so people know about them. That sounds like a reasonable policy for plugin packages to me. It's actually what a lot of totally plugin based software does. I will use that approach for packagesearch. I believe the use of virtual packages is not exactly the most popular thing to do. I remember being advised against it once. Also I don't want the overhead of splitting up the package just yet - there is not much gain coming from that. Thanks to all for the suggestions. Best Regards Ben -- Please do not send any email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- all email not originating from the mailing list will be deleted. Use the reply to address instead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: qttube
Siegfried-Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, the files had wrong versioning (-0ubuntu1) and I corrected
that. You can dget it from here now:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qttube/qttube_0.2~pre1-1.dsc
OK.
2007/8/8, Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe your qttube.post{inst,rm} are missing the #DEBHELPER# line?
If it isn't clear in my last message, it's debhelper who generates
that files during the build.
No, I wrote qttube.post{inst,rm}, not qttube.post{inst,rm}.debhelper,
and I meant it.
You're missing these files in the .deb. Check with mc (simply hit Enter
on the .deb and have a look at what is shipped there). The reason is
most probably because you're not using dh_installdeb.
Apart from that, your packaging looks quite broken to me (sorry for
being blunt, don't take it bad---everyone has to learn one day or the
other).
The most broken thing is that your binary package is arch: any, whereas
it should be arch: all since Python code runs on all platforms and
doesn't need to be compiled specifically for each platform.
Next, I'd say the way you call the main python module is wrong:
,[ /usr/bin/qttube ]
| #! /bin/sh
|
| cd /usr/share/qttube/src
| python ./qttube.py $*
`
IMHO, /usr/bin/qttube should be something like that:
,
| #! /usr/bin/python
|
| # Maybe fiddle here with sys.path to have your private python modules
| # available to import.
|
| import qttube_main_module
|
| qttube_main_module.run()
`
I see you're calling dh_pysupport in binary-indep, but AFAICS, this
currently does absolutely nothing to your .deb file. I think you're
misusing dh_pysupport ATM.
Also, your rules file contains way too much stuff from the dh_make
template, such as the useless configure* targets. You should understand
it fully and only let what is useful.
I suggest to:
- read documentation on dh_pysupport;
- look at other packages in the archive that are using it;
- and then kindly ask on debian-python for someone to check your
packaging (I personally have not yet packaged anything in Python
with the new Python Policy, so I couldn't help much here).
HTH.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.710-2 of my package ntfs-3g. It builds these binary packages: libntfs-3g-dev - ntfs-3g filesystem in userspace (FUSE) library headers libntfs-3g5 - ntfs-3g filesystem in userspace (FUSE) library ntfs-3g- read-write NTFS driver for FUSE The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 436435, 436658 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ntfs-3g - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g_1.710-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Adam Cécile -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
Hi Adam! On 8/8/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.710-2 of my package ntfs-3g. Uploaded. I don't know if you prefer, but you can contact me directly if you need to have another version/revision of the packages that I have sponsored. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
Hi, Thanks :-) Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ? Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : Hi Adam! On 8/8/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.710-2 of my package ntfs-3g. Uploaded. I don't know if you prefer, but you can contact me directly if you need to have another version/revision of the packages that I have sponsored. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
[Adam Cécile (Le_Vert), 08.08.2007] Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ? for i in list of your source packages; do who-uploads $i|grep naoliv echo $i done :-) -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor.txt pgpemHjzTbuQI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote: [Adam Cécile (Le_Vert), 08.08.2007] Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ? for i in list of your source packages; do who-uploads $i|grep naoliv echo $i done But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian machine, it's useless to us nonDDs. -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
[Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 08.08.2007] On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote: [Adam Cécile (Le_Vert), 08.08.2007] Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ? for i in list of your source packages; do who-uploads $i|grep naoliv echo $i done But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian machine, it's useless to us nonDDs. $ apt-file search bin/who-uploads devscripts: usr/bin/who-uploads -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor.txt pgpkG8xJboJv6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
Hmm, I have something crap to ask... As you may have noticed, wxwidget 2.8 is not available in Debian. However Mathias Klose maintain it in Ubuntu... Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ? I'm really fed up with this situation, but wx is far too complex for me and I don't have any interrest in it. All I want is to have wx2.8 in Debian, so I could update filezilla... What's your aim about this ? Having an ubuntu-maintained package is better than not having it, at least for me... Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : Hi! On 8/8/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ? From you it's ink, ntfs-3g, ophcrack and qink :-) Best regards, Nelson
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:08:49PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote: [Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 08.08.2007] But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian machine, it's useless to us nonDDs. $ apt-file search bin/who-uploads devscripts: usr/bin/who-uploads Duh. Sorry. -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
On 2007-08-08, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I have something crap to ask... As you may have noticed, wxwidget 2.8 is not available in Debian. However Mathias Klose maintain it in Ubuntu... Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ? Please coordinate with ron, dam and other people in #-devel who has been discussing wx2.8 over the last couple of days. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
Hi Adam! On 8/8/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ? Hum... I am afraid that it is more complex than just maintaining a sync from Ubuntu... :-/ If you could contact other interested people in getting wxdidgets2.8 on Debian, like Sune said, for sure it would be better. I hope that you understand it, but I can't do this upload and pass over the other people that are coordinating to have it updated. Best regards, Nelson
Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)
No problem. The main problem is nobody cares about wx2.8 at all. Everything went fine. On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:14:34 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adam! On 8/8/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ? Hum... I am afraid that it is more complex than just maintaining a sync from Ubuntu... :-/ If you could contact other interested people in getting wxdidgets2.8 on Debian, like Sune said, for sure it would be better. I hope that you understand it, but I can't do this upload and pass over the other people that are coordinating to have it updated. Best regards, Nelson
Re: RFS: Many php-* packages to be updated: php-auth-http php-compat php-config php-crypt-cbc php-event-dispatcher php-html-common php-html-select php-image-barcode php-net-ping php-net-portscan php-x
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft-php/html/ch-php-libs.html#s -php-libs-pear This is a VERY good idea, and I think it will help a lot to improve the pear package. Thanks for writing this. I currently maintain some PEAR packages and would be interested in joining such a group. Can you add me to the Alioth group please? My login is 'thijs'. Thanks, Thijs I have also request to be part of the group (gplhost-user is my login), as somebody asked me to do so, but received no answer so far... Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: Many php-* packages to be updated: php-auth-http php-compat php-config php-crypt-cbc php-event-dispatcher php-html-common php-html-select php-image-barcode php-net-ping php-net-portscan php-x
Hello, On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:27:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Why did you choose SVN? It's not any better than CVS, it has the same lacks, like not being able to manage unix rights, which is really the basic. Why don't you upgrade to Git or Mercurial which are REALLY a LOT better? The very big advantage of Git is that everybody can have it's own public repository and just send you the URL so you can pull from it. I choose nothing. SVN is the SCM of pkg-php team, where there are some pear-modules in team maintenance. I agree that GIT is great but for storing pear-modules packages I don't care about using CVS, SVN, ARCH, GIT or whatever SCM. I plan to improve Requirements for PHP PEAR libraries[*] to have a common policy for all PHP PEAR modules (common packaging, short/long description, procedures to request a new PHP PEAR module package or updating) in order to facilitate team maintainance and have high-quality and uptodate PHP PEAR packages. [*] http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft-php/html/ch-php-libs.html#s-php-libs-pear This is a VERY good idea, and I think it will help a lot to improve the pear package. Thanks for writing this. Ok, it sounds good. Regards, -- Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: Many php-* packages to be updated: php-auth-http php-compat php-config php-crypt-cbc php-event-dispatcher php-html-common php-html-select php-image-barcode php-net-ping php-net-portscan php-x
Hello, On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: [...] This is a VERY good idea, and I think it will help a lot to improve the pear package. Thanks for writing this. I currently maintain some PEAR packages and would be interested in joining such a group. Can you add me to the Alioth group please? My login is 'thijs'. If you speak of webapps-common, see directly with group admins, I'm not (yet?) member of this group. If you speak of alioth group for maintaining pear-modules packages, it's currently in pkg-php group. I'm not group admin then ask for joining (please list your pear-modules packages). Regards, -- Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
