Re: RFS: hwinfo (updated package)
Hello! On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Am 16.06.2011 13:48, schrieb Kilian Krause: Hi William, Simply changing the build-depends from libhal-dev to libudev-dev does not magically port an application from HAL to udev. Btw, the URL debian/copyright [1] does give a 404. You should update that. Done The latest version I could find is 18.5 via [2]. The spec file indicates, that this version no longer uses hal: * Fri May 21 2010 snw...@suse.de - detect formfactor without hal (bnc #591703) * Wed Mar 17 2010 snw...@suse.de - remove hal dependency - removed VERSION I said the same in my last email Please consider updating the hwinfo package in Debian accordingly. I have some issues about the package: kbd.c: In function 'add_serial_console': kbd.c:105:27: warning: unused variable 'tty_minor' [-Wunused-variable] kbd.c:105:12: warning: unused variable 'tty_major' [-Wunused-variable] gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd -I /usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I /usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include klog.c gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd -I /usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I /usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include manual.c gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd -I /usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I /usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include mdt.c mdt.c:20:20: fatal error: x86emu.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[3]: *** [mdt.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-18.5/src/hd' make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-18.5/src' make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-18.5' dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 billy@skynet:~/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-18.5$ Then I looking for x86emu.h: billy@skynet:~/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-18.5$ locate x86emu.h /home/billy/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-16.0/src/x86emu/include/x86emu.h billy@skynet:~/dev/hwinfo/hwinfo-18.5$ Is only in the old version (16.0), if I see the RPM depends: billy@skynet:~$ rpm -qpR hwinfo-18.5-2.2.src.rpm warning: hwinfo-18.5-2.2.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 3dbdc284: NOKEY doxygen flex perl-XML-Parser udev perl-XML-Writer libx86emu-devel rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 billy@skynet:~$ It show a libx86emu-devel as depend obviously, and at the new project's URL: http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/src-oss/suse/src/ We can found at libx86emu-1.1-12.1.src.rpm, as I see x86emu.h is packaged as different software and is no longer included in the sources of hwinfo. I tried to find a package to provide x86emu.h unsuccessfully: billy@skynet:~$ apt-cache search x86emu billy@skynet:~$ dpkg -S x86emu dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern *x86emu*. billy@skynet:~$ I need make a package for x86emu.h or I can make some patch for this? I would appreciate your comments and advices. Cheers, Michael [1] http://mirrors.kernel.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/src [2] http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=hwinfobaseproject=openSUSE%3AFactory -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? Regards -- William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikjmxhnedlpfhfzhkyclu9vaka...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: hwinfo (updated package)
William, On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 01:34 -0500, William Vera wrote: -(snip)- I need make a package for x86emu.h or I can make some patch for this? I would appreciate your comments and advices. from a first look at [1] this seems to be a kFreeBSD issue so it may be safe to patch the x86emu.h out for Linux. [1]: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contentskeywords=x86emu.hmode=exactfilenamesuite=unstablearch=any -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: arp-scan (updated package, new maintainer)
William,
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 20:29 -0500, William Vera wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6-3
of my package arp-scan.
It builds these binary packages:
arp-scan - arp scanning and fingerprinting tool
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 630563, 631213
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arp-scan
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arp-scan/arp-scan_1.6-3.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
thanks for your work and for stepping up as new maintainer of this
package. Here's some question's I'd like answered before finally putting
this into the archive:
1. you introduced debian/watch and latest version according to uscan is
1.8. Yet you still uploaded a 1.6-2. Why? Is 1.8 not yet ready?
2. You bump debhelper build-depends to 7.0.50~ but leave debian/compat
at 5. I think both should be 8.
3. debian/patches/debian-changes-1.6-2 was removed with no obvious
reason why it was needed in the first place and now isn't anymore. To me
this patch smells like a backport from a newer upstream release. Please
put some sort of comment into the changelog if this was intentionally
dropped with a short explanation (obviously cannot be fixed upstream
with same upstream version packaged).
4. arp-scan-1.6-2/debian/patches/fixmanpages.patch has no comment this
was forwarded upstream. I think it should be though.
5. lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/doc/arp-scan/ChangeLog.gz -
changelog.gz
is a funny artefact of dh_installchangelogs -k I think going
without the -k would be better unless you say something is relying on
the name ChangeLog.gz in mixed spelling.
6. dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package arp-scan: unused substitution
variable ${perl:Depends}
should also be fixed I guess.
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: arp-scan (updated package, new maintainer)
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
thanks for your work and for stepping up as new maintainer of this
package. Here's some question's I'd like answered before finally putting
this into the archive:
1. you introduced debian/watch and latest version according to uscan is
1.8. Yet you still uploaded a 1.6-2. Why? Is 1.8 not yet ready?
I recently downloaded and at first look, I have this error:
Checking custom ARP request packet with VLAN tag and LLC/SNAP framing
against ./pkt-custom-request-vlan-llc.dat ...
FAILED
FAIL: check-packet
Checking simple ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-simple-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking padded ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-padding-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking 802.1Q ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-vlan-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking LLC/SNAP ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-llc-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking 192.168.1.0/24 ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-net1921681-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking IP range ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-simple-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking IP net:mask ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-simple-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking trailer ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-trailer-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking 802.1Q LLC ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-vlan-llc-response.pcap ...
ok
PASS: check-decode
Checking host list creation using ./pkt-net1921681-response.pcap ...
ok
PASS: check-host-list
=
1 of 4 tests failed
Please report to arp-s...@nta-monitor.com
=
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/arp-scan/arp-scan-1.8'
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/arp-scan/arp-scan-1.8'
dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 29
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
I'm a little tired now (it's 3am here) but as I said, at first look
its a bite weird.
2. You bump debhelper build-depends to 7.0.50~ but leave debian/compat
at 5. I think both should be 8.
Updated.
3. debian/patches/debian-changes-1.6-2 was removed with no obvious
reason why it was needed in the first place and now isn't anymore. To me
this patch smells like a backport from a newer upstream release. Please
put some sort of comment into the changelog if this was intentionally
dropped with a short explanation (obviously cannot be fixed upstream
with same upstream version packaged).
It's not from original source is because my dirty workspace I just
removed the directory and uncompressed again to cleanup the diff.
4. arp-scan-1.6-2/debian/patches/fixmanpages.patch has no comment this
was forwarded upstream. I think it should be though.
Yes I did.
5. lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/doc/arp-scan/ChangeLog.gz -
changelog.gz
is a funny artefact of dh_installchangelogs -k I think going
without the -k would be better unless you say something is relying on
the name ChangeLog.gz in mixed spelling.
It's according the man page: man dh_installchangelogs
6. dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package arp-scan: unused substitution
variable ${perl:Depends}
I'm a little confused, how I can clean this warning?
should also be fixed I guess.
Sure, I'm working on it!
--
Best regards,
Kilian
Thanks!
Cheers
--
William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx
PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4
Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=drsibf1g9heqf2zdzsq_kpga...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: arp-scan (updated package, new maintainer)
William,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 03:05 -0500, William Vera wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
thanks for your work and for stepping up as new maintainer of this
package. Here's some question's I'd like answered before finally putting
this into the archive:
1. you introduced debian/watch and latest version according to uscan is
1.8. Yet you still uploaded a 1.6-2. Why? Is 1.8 not yet ready?
I recently downloaded and at first look, I have this error:
Checking custom ARP request packet with VLAN tag and LLC/SNAP framing
against ./pkt-custom-request-vlan-llc.dat ...
FAILED
FAIL: check-packet
Checking simple ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-simple-response.pcap
...
ok
Checking padded ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-padding-response.pcap
...
ok
Checking 802.1Q ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-vlan-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking LLC/SNAP ARP response packet decode using ./pkt-llc-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking 192.168.1.0/24 ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-net1921681-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking IP range ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-simple-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking IP net:mask ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-simple-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking trailer ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-trailer-response.pcap ...
ok
Checking 802.1Q LLC ARP response packet decode using
./pkt-vlan-llc-response.pcap ...
ok
PASS: check-decode
Checking host list creation using ./pkt-net1921681-response.pcap ...
ok
PASS: check-host-list
=
1 of 4 tests failed
Please report to arp-s...@nta-monitor.com
=
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/arp-scan/arp-scan-1.8'
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/billy/dev/arp-scan/arp-scan-1.8'
dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 29
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
I'm a little tired now (it's 3am here) but as I said, at first look
its a bite weird.
I guess you should try to do what it reads. Ask
arp-s...@nta-monitor.com and see what they tell about why this is
happening - and how to fix it properly.
2. You bump debhelper build-depends to 7.0.50~ but leave debian/compat
at 5. I think both should be 8.
Updated.
3. debian/patches/debian-changes-1.6-2 was removed with no obvious
reason why it was needed in the first place and now isn't anymore. To me
this patch smells like a backport from a newer upstream release. Please
put some sort of comment into the changelog if this was intentionally
dropped with a short explanation (obviously cannot be fixed upstream
with same upstream version packaged).
It's not from original source is because my dirty workspace I just
removed the directory and uncompressed again to cleanup the diff.
I seem to have put it confusingly. You dropped a patch that was in
1.6-1. Where has that patch gone? Why is it dropped and no longer
needed?
4. arp-scan-1.6-2/debian/patches/fixmanpages.patch has no comment this
was forwarded upstream. I think it should be though.
Yes I did.
Great!
5. lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/doc/arp-scan/ChangeLog.gz -
changelog.gz
is a funny artefact of dh_installchangelogs -k I think going
without the -k would be better unless you say something is relying on
the name ChangeLog.gz in mixed spelling.
It's according the man page: man dh_installchangelogs
Which part of:
Keep the original name of the upstream changelog. This will be
accomplished by installing the upstream changelog as
changelog, and
making a symlink from that to the original name of the
changelog
file. This can be useful if the upstream changelog has an
unusual
name, or if other documentation in the package refers to the
changelog file.
are you referring to? ChangeLog is not a unusual name. Thus IMHO the -k
can still be dropped.
6. dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package arp-scan: unused substitution
variable ${perl:Depends}
I'm a little confused, how I can clean this warning?
Feed the perl file that resides out of place to dh_perl on the command
line or drop the ${perl:Depends} if it's not needed.
should also be fixed I guess.
Sure, I'm working on it!
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: cfortran (updated package)
Hi Bastien, On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 21:08 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:20110621-1 of my package cfortran. actually why would you want that? The latest version in unstable has DM-Upload-Allowed set to yes already. Anyhow here goes some comments. It builds these binary packages: cfortran - Header file permitting Fortran routines to be called in C/C++ The package appears to be lintian clean. Yes. Very nice. Even though --pedantic still complains about: P: cfortran source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt P: cfortran: no-upstream-changelog I: cfortran: conflicts-with-version libcfitsio-dev ( 2.440-1) I: cfortran: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration Regarding the first two I would agree this should be fixed with one of the next uploads. In order to be more robust I have switched this package to arch all to arch any in order to run testsuite Not really sure this is a good rationale even though I like the idea. Notice that I am maintening it upstream. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cfortran - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cfortran/cfortran_20110621-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. 1. uscan gives: uscan warning: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/cfortran/ failed: 404 File Not Found 2. Especially since you're upstream yourself I'd favour not doing autoreconf during the actual build. This should be done prior to generating the orig.tar.gz IMHO as it usually causes more problems than it solves. dh-autoreconf should thus be dropped from the B-Depends. 3. debian/copyright isn't yet DEP-5 format. 4. You include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make in debian/rules to do the Git-Packaging I guess. As said, I myself would rather export something stable as orig.tar.gz and work from there. How you script your get-orig-source target is another thing and can use quilt/git/dpatch/whatever... 5. You dropped /usr/include/cfortran.h from your deb which may or may not be required by other packages. I hope this was intentional - cannot find any mentioning in the changelog. Anyway, it's your package and someone has already granted you DM-Upload-Allowed for a reason. Thus if you think this is the way your package works best, why not upload it yourself? -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: dsniff (updated package)
Hi William,
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 01:43 -0500, William Vera wrote:
Hello Mentors!
I am still looking for a sponsor, your help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dsniff/
1. README.source still talks about dpatch despite changelog reads
package converted.
2. libx11-6 is now always pulled in via Depends. You can safely edit
README.Debian to reflect this or rather remove it entirely.
3. in debian/rules why is
override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=
$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
needed and different from the debhelper7 automagic configuration?
Apart from this fine for upload into Debian IMHO.
--
Cheers,
Kilian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1309165634.4072.45.ca...@rusty.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
Hi Nikolaus,
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 21:05 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package s3ql.
* Package name: s3ql
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : me (Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org)
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/s3ql/
* License : GPLv3
Section : misc
It builds these binary packages:
s3ql - Full-featured file system for online data storage
The package appears to be lintian clean.
ITP: 626651
I'd be happy to join the python-apps-team and have this team maintained,
but so far I did not get any response on my request to join the team on
Alioth. Should I be doing anything else?
At the moment, the package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Thanks for your work. Here goes my comments:
1. You use quilt as build-depends. This should not be neccessary with
dpkg-source v3.
2. fix-sys-path.patch feels like you should split out the python modules
into the standard python path. That may also cause ${python:Depends} to
match further packages directly without having them explicitly spelled
out on the Depends line in debian/control
Setting --install-lib=/usr/share/s3ql to something more sensible
(according to [1] would be /usr/lib/s3ql) will help here.
3. debian/README.Debian doesn't need to be in *.docs. See man
dh_installdocs:
Each of these files is automatically installed if present for a
package.
4. Downloading
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/distribute/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz
Extracting in /tmp/tmpeY0G4V
OUCH! buildds do not all have internet access. Your package should build
fine without that. Moreover the contents of the pulled in tarball could
be anything. Thus ensuring DFSG-free sources is virtually impossible
when external sources are pulled in.
5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder:
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to
s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: error: add distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz in
debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary
in the debian tarball
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to
s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14-py2.6.egg: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: error: add distribute-0.6.14-py2.6.egg in
debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary
in the debian tarball
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to
s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: error: add distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg in
debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary
in the debian tarball
dpkg-source: error: unrepresentable changes to source
dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b s3ql-1.0.1 gave error exit
status 2
[1]:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html
Sorry!
--
Regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: oggfix
Hi, [...] Ok, I wouldn't bother much about the above, but one thing does stop me from uploading: why are you setting the version number in such a way that Debian is upstream? This doesn't seem to be accurate. IMHO you should be using 0.9.1-1 as version number!? Never found out what the version number ought to be. 0.9.1-1 sounds exactly right. Thanks for that, too! This is explained in full detail in the Debian Policy [1]. Hope this helps, Michael [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version pgpjqeXLda4PY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: jappix
Hi, [...] The package looks pretty fine from my POV, hence built and uploaded. One thing to be fixed by upstream, however, is the lack of license and copyright information in source files. Given that this is what will be shipped plus the interspersed BSD and GPL files such information would really be valuable. Furthermore, in future uploads please address the following: W: jappix: description-synopsis-starts-with-article W: jappix: embedded-javascript-library usr/share/jappix/js/jquery.form.js Best regards, Michael PS.: And yes, there's a new upstream version out :-) Thanks Michael for taking the time to review this package. I started to set up the packaging in the pkg-xmpp team Git repository. I am also in the process of making a package with the latest (0.7) version. Marcelo Jorge Viera helped me to find the issues with the initial package. Most of the problems you mentioned should be fixed in the Git repository. Do you want me to copy the new version to mentors.debian.net? Not necessarily, no, but a pointer to the git repository would have been nice :-) Anyway, I figured it must be anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-xmpp/jappix.git/ and did a git-buildpackage on that one. The HEAD appears to be a somewhat outdated ed8c3e4ab8ee2992bd4987f14e37ea01450df957, however, and I couldn't find any of my above concerns addressed in this version!? Best, Michael pgpxYvYjlDpej.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
* Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org, 2011-06-27, 11:20: 2. fix-sys-path.patch feels like you should split out the python modules into the standard python path. No. Putting private modules into, well, a private directory is the best practice. Setting --install-lib=/usr/share/s3ql to something more sensible (according to [1] would be /usr/lib/s3ql) will help here. Again, no. Even the Python Policy chapter you quotes explicitly says /usr/share/s3ql is all right: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html The more relevant Python Policy chapter would be http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-programs.html however. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110627095400.ga9...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: nglogc (updated package)
Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nglogc. * Package name: nglogc Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Dennis Krzyzaniak ebros...@netgarage.org * URL : http://code.google.com/p/nglogc/downloads/list * License : GNU LGPL Section : libs It builds these binary packages: nglogc-dev - Flexible C logging API nglogc0- Flexible C logging API The package appears to be lintian clean. [...] Sorry, but that's simply not true. I'm finding 7 warnings and 2 errors. Please re-try... Anyway, here are the more detailed comments, which would also solve some of those issues found by lintian: - debian/control: why build for architecture i386 only? - debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format. - debian/rules: please consider using the debhelper 7 simplified style. - no debian/watch file Hope this helps, Michael pgpxJ2olng4FH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
Jakub, On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:54 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org, 2011-06-27, 11:20: 2. fix-sys-path.patch feels like you should split out the python modules into the standard python path. No. Putting private modules into, well, a private directory is the best practice. Setting --install-lib=/usr/share/s3ql to something more sensible (according to [1] would be /usr/lib/s3ql) will help here. Again, no. Even the Python Policy chapter you quotes explicitly says /usr/share/s3ql is all right: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html The more relevant Python Policy chapter would be http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-programs.html however. thanks for double checking. I was somewhat under the impression that these modules might be used sort of as a library by other programs too. But I admit that I had a too brief look and should have checked closer. In any case if upstream foresees this as lib for other python scripts to use (as is suggested by the configure parameter) then it should be consequently installed as public lib. If it's private then upstream should foresee that option consistently in the configure script and sources. The correct path set for configure PLUS patching still feels wrong. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: debconf-kde (ping)
Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package debconf-kde. * Package name: debconf-kde Version : 0.1+git20101228-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Nicoletti dantti85...@yahoo.com.br * URL : https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/sysadmin/libdebconf-kde/ * License : LGPL-2+ Section : kde It builds these binary packages: debconf-kde-dbg - Debconf KDE debugging symbols debconf-kde-helper - Debconf KDE GUI frontend tool libdebconf-kde-dev - Development headers for the Debconf KDE library libdebconf-kde0 - Debconf KDE GUI library [...] It seems that no one has found the time to sponsor this package so far, hence I just did that and uploaded it. It looks mostly ok, apart from a few smaller issues, which should be addressed in future versions: - There is no Homepage field and also no watch file. - There is a symbols file, but that has a two problems: it's called libdebconf-kde.symbols, and not libdebconf-kde0.symbols; second, you should preferably use the c++ pattern of dpkg-gensymbols, which was introduced in dpkg-dev 1.5.18. - Lintian will also tell you the following: I: debconf-kde-dbg: capitalization-error-in-description debian Debian (and similarly for all other packages) Best regards, Michael pgpENSrEI9LJU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: hiredis - Minimalistic C client library for Redis
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 06:27:50PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Sorry for getting back to this with such a large delay.
No problem.
[...]
just one major problem: all files in adapter/ and
the example* and test.c files lack both copyright and license information.
Please persuade upstream to get this fixed.
I'm going to contact upstream as soon as possible. Thanks for the pointer.
What would be a viable solution? I mean, is a new upstream release needed,
or just a statement from the upstream author (e.g. on the project's
bugtracker, to which d/copyright will point) is enough? The second solution
does not exlude the first of course (the files will be fixed in a
subsequent release) but would permit the package to enter Debian without
waiting and to not block other packages that depend on this (e.g. webdis
which is an ITP).
I've uploaded your package as-is. Yet it would be nice if upstream could,
with a
future new upstream release, add all this information to the source files.
Great, thank you very much. Regarding the missing copyright and license
issue, I have opened a ticket upstream, and, hopefully, it will get a fix
soon.
Thank you again
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110627102735.gc1...@pc-ale.fastwebnet.it
Re: RFS: dsniff (updated package)
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Kilian Krause k...@verfaction.de wrote:
Hi William,
1. README.source still talks about dpatch despite changelog reads
package converted.
Updated for quilt
2. libx11-6 is now always pulled in via Depends. You can safely edit
README.Debian to reflect this or rather remove it entirely.
It's in Recommends because it's used by 'webspy' not properly by 'dnisff'
IMHO it's fine how is in README.Debian
3. in debian/rules why is
override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=
$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
needed and different from the debhelper7 automagic configuration?
Not really, droped
Apart from this fine for upload into Debian IMHO.
Thanks for you review, the packages is updated:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dsniff/dsniff_2.4b1+debian-21.dsc
--
Cheers,
Kilian
Regards
--
William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx
PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4
Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/banlktikctxkcxny3knjzslhcyli_ger...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: arp-scan (updated package, new maintainer)
Hi
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
William,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 03:05 -0500, William Vera wrote:
I guess you should try to do what it reads. Ask
arp-s...@nta-monitor.com and see what they tell about why this is
happening - and how to fix it properly.
Exactly, I already sent a email
I seem to have put it confusingly. You dropped a patch that was in
1.6-1. Where has that patch gone? Why is it dropped and no longer
needed?
Was not a patch on intentionally, was a self-generated file, the
package did not use quilt until I implemented it, the file
autogenerated showed differences between diff because of a dirty
environment.
Which part of:
Keep the original name of the upstream changelog. This will be
accomplished by installing the upstream changelog as
changelog, and
making a symlink from that to the original name of the
changelog
file. This can be useful if the upstream changelog has an
unusual
name, or if other documentation in the package refers to the
changelog file.
are you referring to? ChangeLog is not a unusual name. Thus IMHO the -k
can still be dropped.
Droped
6. dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package arp-scan: unused substitution
variable ${perl:Depends}
I'm a little confused, how I can clean this warning?
Feed the perl file that resides out of place to dh_perl on the command
line or drop the ${perl:Depends} if it's not needed.
I don't understood, I don't have ${perl:Depends} in my control file,
or which file are you talking about?
Thanks!
Thanks to you for your review
--
Best regards,
Kilian
Cheers
--
William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx
PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4
Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=yxc4unHqBNU9h=G2N0m_S9zX5=g...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: dsniff (updated package)
William,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:22 -0500, William Vera wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Kilian Krause k...@verfaction.de wrote:
Hi William,
1. README.source still talks about dpatch despite changelog reads
package converted.
Updated for quilt
Good.
2. libx11-6 is now always pulled in via Depends. You can safely edit
README.Debian to reflect this or rather remove it entirely.
It's in Recommends because it's used by 'webspy' not properly by 'dnisff'
IMHO it's fine how is in README.Debian
Your resulting deb is:
$ dpkg -I dsniff_2.4b1+debian-21_amd64.deb|grep libx11
Depends: libc6 (= 2.7), libdb5.1, libice6 (= 1:1.0.0), libnet1 (=
1.1.2.1), libnids1.21, libpcap0.8 (= 0.9.8), libsm6, libssl1.0.0 (=
1.0.0), libx11-6, libxmu6, openssl
(requires libx11-6 installed).
$
obviously setting Depends, not Recommends. Thus your README.Debian is
kinda bogusly telling the user to install something she already has
installed.
3. in debian/rules why is
override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=
$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
needed and different from the debhelper7 automagic configuration?
Not really, droped
Good.
Apart from this fine for upload into Debian IMHO.
Thanks for you review, the packages is updated:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dsniff/dsniff_2.4b1+debian-21.dsc
built, signed, uploaded.
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: arp-scan (updated package, new maintainer)
William,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 09:01 -0500, William Vera wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
William,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 03:05 -0500, William Vera wrote:
I guess you should try to do what it reads. Ask
arp-s...@nta-monitor.com and see what they tell about why this is
happening - and how to fix it properly.
Exactly, I already sent a email
Good. ;-)
I seem to have put it confusingly. You dropped a patch that was in
1.6-1. Where has that patch gone? Why is it dropped and no longer
needed?
Was not a patch on intentionally, was a self-generated file, the
package did not use quilt until I implemented it, the file
autogenerated showed differences between diff because of a dirty
environment.
Ah, I see.
Which part of:
Keep the original name of the upstream changelog. This will be
accomplished by installing the upstream changelog as
changelog, and
making a symlink from that to the original name of the
changelog
file. This can be useful if the upstream changelog has an
unusual
name, or if other documentation in the package refers to the
changelog file.
are you referring to? ChangeLog is not a unusual name. Thus IMHO the -k
can still be dropped.
Droped
6. dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package arp-scan: unused substitution
variable ${perl:Depends}
I'm a little confused, how I can clean this warning?
Feed the perl file that resides out of place to dh_perl on the command
line or drop the ${perl:Depends} if it's not needed.
I don't understood, I don't have ${perl:Depends} in my control file,
or which file are you talking about?
Right. Weird. My pbuilder does throw that though. I think it can be
safely ignored then.
Thanks!
Thanks to you for your review
Np ;-)
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: dsniff (updated package)
Hi Kilian On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: William, It's in Recommends because it's used by 'webspy' not properly by 'dnisff' IMHO it's fine how is in README.Debian Your resulting deb is: $ dpkg -I dsniff_2.4b1+debian-21_amd64.deb|grep libx11 Depends: libc6 (= 2.7), libdb5.1, libice6 (= 1:1.0.0), libnet1 (= 1.1.2.1), libnids1.21, libpcap0.8 (= 0.9.8), libsm6, libssl1.0.0 (= 1.0.0), libx11-6, libxmu6, openssl (requires libx11-6 installed). $ obviously setting Depends, not Recommends. Thus your README.Debian is kinda bogusly telling the user to install something she already has installed. Touché ... I'll fix it in the next release built, signed, uploaded. Thanks! Thanks! -- Cheers, Kilian Regards -- William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi[-Scm=qlzs_abvt003z6j3m...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: debconf-kde (ping)
[...] It seems that no one has found the time to sponsor this package so far, hence I just did that and uploaded it. It looks mostly ok, apart from a few smaller issues, which should be addressed in future versions: - There is no Homepage field and also no watch file. - There is a symbols file, but that has a two problems: it's called libdebconf-kde.symbols, and not libdebconf-kde0.symbols; second, you should preferably use the c++ pattern of dpkg-gensymbols, which was introduced in dpkg-dev 1.5.18. - Lintian will also tell you the following: I: debconf-kde-dbg: capitalization-error-in-description debian Debian (and similarly for all other packages) Hi! Wow, great! Thanks for sponsoring this package! I'm currently working with pkg-kde on maintaining it under the pkg-kde-team umbrella, all the issues you mentioned above have been fixed in our Git branch :) Anyway, this means Debian is ready for Muon and Apper now ;) (as well as for a generic KDE Debconf-frontend) Cheers, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1108e324798373d911d4918d866d...@mb8-2.1blu.de
How to patch a file with changing path?
Hi there, currently i'm trying to package the new alpha of typo3, but there is a problem: the new upstream tar.gz contains the core of typo3 file in a directory that has the version in its name (eg: [/]typo3_src-4.6.0alpha2/t3lib/GPL.txt). There are also some symlinks into this directory tslib - typo3_src-4.6.0alpha2/t3lib. So if i want to patch GPL.txt, i cannot patch trough the symlink as quilt wont let me, but i do not want to change all patches every release to adjust the path of the files... I'm not sure, how to handle this and need counsel. There is also a zip available, that does not contain either symlinks or versioned directories, but i cannot use zip as upstream package. I use 3.0(quilt) format. Please set me to CC as i'm not subscribed to the list. -- MfG, Christian Welzel GPG-Key: http://www.camlann.de/de/pgpkey.html Fingerprint: 4F50 19BF 3346 36A6 CFA9 DBDC C268 6D24 70A1 AD15 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e08b622.8030...@camlann.de
Re: How to patch a file with changing path?
Hi Christian, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:56:02PM +0200, Christian Welzel wrote: currently i'm trying to package the new alpha of typo3, but there is a problem: the new upstream tar.gz contains the core of typo3 file in a directory that has the version in its name (eg: [/]typo3_src-4.6.0alpha2/t3lib/GPL.txt). There are also some symlinks into this directory tslib - typo3_src-4.6.0alpha2/t3lib. So if i want to patch GPL.txt, i cannot patch trough the symlink as quilt wont let me, but i do not want to change all patches every release to adjust the path of the files... interesting problem. ;-) I'm not sure, how to handle this and need counsel. There is also a zip available, that does not contain either symlinks or versioned directories, but i cannot use zip as upstream package. I use 3.0(quilt) format. As I see things you've got 3 options: - talk to upstream and make them release a tarball without that versioned dir - introduce a sed line (or perl/python/whatever) in the clean target using a fancy regexp on debian/patches/... and fixing the path according to the version number of your deb or even better with a path that you just found via e.g. ls -1 - Why you can't use the zip I don't see. You can easily repack and note that in README.source. Use the get-orig-source target in debian/rules for that and possibly use a ~debian version number. The ~debian is not neccessary though IMHO in this case. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
Kilian Krause kilian-8fiuurrzop0dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org writes: Hi Nikolaus, On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 21:05 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package s3ql. * Package name: s3ql Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : me (Nikolaus Rath nikolaus-bth8mxji...@public.gmane.org) * URL : http://code.google.com/p/s3ql/ * License : GPLv3 Section : misc It builds these binary packages: s3ql - Full-featured file system for online data storage The package appears to be lintian clean. ITP: 626651 I'd be happy to join the python-apps-team and have this team maintained, but so far I did not get any response on my request to join the team on Alioth. Should I be doing anything else? At the moment, the package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks for your work. Here goes my comments: 1. You use quilt as build-depends. This should not be neccessary with dpkg-source v3. It seems to be. Without quilt: dh clean --with python2,quilt dh: unable to load addon quilt: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/quilt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.12.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.12.3 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.12 /usr/share/perl/5.12 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 23) line 2. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 23) line 2. 3. debian/README.Debian doesn't need to be in *.docs. See man dh_installdocs: Thanks, fixed. 4. Downloading http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/distribute/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz Extracting in /tmp/tmpeY0G4V OUCH! buildds do not all have internet access. Your package should build fine without that. Moreover the contents of the pulled in tarball could be anything. Thus ensuring DFSG-free sources is virtually impossible when external sources are pulled in. 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz: binary file contents changed That's weird, it works just fine here, and it also does not download anything but uses the existing python-setuptools. Can you tell me what commands you used to get this? Best, -Nikolaus -- »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iprrozkq@inspiron.ap.columbia.edu
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nikolaus, On 27.06.2011 21:15, Nikolaus Rath wrote: It seems to be. Without quilt: dh clean --with python2,quilt dh: unable to load addon quilt: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/quilt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.12.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.12.3 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.12 /usr/share/perl/5.12 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 23) line 2. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 23) line 2. this is, because you configured: %: dh $@ --with python2,quilt which runs dh_quilt_patch upon creation of the source directory. This is not necessary when using the new quilt 3.0 format which does this implicitly. That said, you should be able to remove the quilt addon from dh and everything should still work (untested). - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOCOHFAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt+HYP/2ZuwNIS7dQTslXxd+LWBpdd 8N+9AHYSOyfimdL8aM5LhXqNsasd7J8fqDWabYVOfL/HSh3RkHJ58ITZrqLBdaoL qRjok8G76RAcYStba+LHv+rUI4v3YI5nAZVRi/+nZ43dHLWHHFRsHQp02kzB8VQp PZAqoSSAw6uxK+bekq36yVlmJE6efezuPa+T7Q4WdPmSadJRbKu0ry7/rK5qTvbF eLGISJSzvpoIUmanxRLjS5a1zoHe258tWU0q/wjXDJ5x/AOtVkGQpoT9P+rLGwoE LrbOzy0ZTPj+x85cLt/X7CusNFAlbB5BvrlDHzD/3wrQt3J3OfOG4iP2Uw9cIngY OoxS7lbN8s6sdKWMLueKb6m+tH2gTTuX+oohtPge0I4LCKxsP/f5bfYTrtv23CJQ NDiW05uYXXglZAaIh56vmpR/UBdkkjk11s0+VAho3azbzbLJb5ZwtVMtO/4FPAp+ Sd5YTwGKFOxFqLm4SeJGkonjqd0jENYrOhkVvhkrFXKqUYXJudklQJaGzdQsBvgK bZMIhD6EvFpZTUNFX14ajfjXysPSoojiAeq4az0bepgLn9KNdLNuSG6cki7inIYw WsOwuorL6oSyABMRkkegeYP0TSXmKkVjIr5SQ0p5ATLX0OlqdH/jdTBGvsYFHRur rVbpBs1NdZDLs8zs9X3D =t7TR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e08e1c6.5040...@toell.net
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
Hi Nikolaus, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: 1. You use quilt as build-depends. This should not be neccessary with dpkg-source v3. It seems to be. Without quilt: dh clean --with python2,quilt dh: unable to load addon quilt: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/quilt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.12.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.12.3 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.12 /usr/share/perl/5.12 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 23) line 2. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 23) line 2. my suggestion would be the same as Arno already pointed out. The --with quilt part should not be needed - I hope. 3. debian/README.Debian doesn't need to be in *.docs. See man dh_installdocs: Thanks, fixed. 4. Downloading http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/distribute/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz Extracting in /tmp/tmpeY0G4V OUCH! buildds do not all have internet access. Your package should build fine without that. Moreover the contents of the pulled in tarball could be anything. Thus ensuring DFSG-free sources is virtually impossible when external sources are pulled in. 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz: binary file contents changed That's weird, it works just fine here, and it also does not download anything but uses the existing python-setuptools. Can you tell me what commands you used to get this? dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild which spawns a fresh unstable pbuilder chroot and installs your listed build-deps. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
On 06/27/2011 05:32 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz: binary file contents changed That's weird, it works just fine here, and it also does not download anything but uses the existing python-setuptools. Can you tell me what commands you used to get this? dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild which spawns a fresh unstable pbuilder chroot and installs your listed build-deps. Hmm. On my system: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild runs perfectly. I do not have any extra stuff installed in my chroot except for vim. The complete build output is at http://pastebin.com/3na83pQT I don't quite know what to do here... do you have any idea? Could you post the complete output on your system as well? Best, -Nikolaus -- »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e090860.8010...@rath.org
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-27, 18:46: 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz: binary file contents changed That's weird, it works just fine here, and it also does not download anything but uses the existing python-setuptools. Can you tell me what commands you used to get this? dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild which spawns a fresh unstable pbuilder chroot and installs your listed build-deps. Hmm. On my system: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild runs perfectly. I do not have any extra stuff installed in my chroot except for vim. My wild[0] guess is that bad thing happen _outside_ chroot: pdebuild runs the clean target without build-dependencies installed. [0] I didn't look at the package lately and I've never user pdebuild. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110627231458.ga7...@jwilk.net
RFS: kst (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.3-1 of my package kst. It builds these binary packages: kst- scientific data plotting tool kst-data - set of data files for kst kst-doc- set of tutorials for kst libkst2core2 - kst core library libkst2math2 - kst math library libkst2widgets2 - kst widgets library The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 553793, 589685, 604335, 615738 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kst - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kst/kst_2.0.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Ruben Molina signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RFS: calamaris (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.99.4.0-14 of my package calamaris. It builds these binary packages: calamaris - log analyzer for Squid or Oops proxy log files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 624120, 626242, 627467, 627708 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/calamaris - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/calamaris/calamaris_2.99.4.0-14.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards daniel echeverry -- Epsilon http://www.rinconinformatico.net http://www.fitnessdeportes.com http://www.dragonjar.org Linux user: #477840 Debian user
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
Nikolaus, On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:46 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: On 06/27/2011 05:32 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to s3ql-1.0.1/distribute-0.6.14.tar.gz: binary file contents changed That's weird, it works just fine here, and it also does not download anything but uses the existing python-setuptools. Can you tell me what commands you used to get this? dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild which spawns a fresh unstable pbuilder chroot and installs your listed build-deps. Hmm. On my system: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc dpkg-source -x s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc;cd s3ql-1.0.1;pdebuild runs perfectly. I do not have any extra stuff installed in my chroot except for vim. The complete build output is at http://pastebin.com/3na83pQT I don't quite know what to do here... do you have any idea? Could you post the complete output on your system as well? the missing build-deps on my system are: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: python-setuptools (= 0.6.14) python-apsw (= 3.7.0) python-sphinx python-argparse python-llfuse (= 0.31) python-pycryptopp python-paramiko python-lzma (= 0.5.3) full build log is at: http://people.debian.org/~kilian/s3ql_1.0.1-1_amd64.build -- Regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
