Re: Any idea how to write watch file for codeplex hosted sources?
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: I have spent some time into writing a watch file for https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/ but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help anyway? No, as you can't get a direct link to sources without JavaScript at all. All you can get is a list of name-version strings with links to individual download pages, and that won't help uscan. Sorry, but that's not true. The source of the https response above contains https://csb.codeplex.com/downloads/get/466454 as direct link and it delivers the tarball in question after some seconds of delay. That's JS. The line of html code that contains this link also contains the version number as link content so finally some mangling should work. That's JS too. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
On 11/6/12 5:13 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: a potential sponsor for reintroducing libpam-ssh asked me to contact you as previous maintainer for comments on the reintroduction version, which is meant to be a minimal version. A commented debdiff output is attached in such a way you can get quickly a picture of this minimal version. Looks fine to me, thanks for taking care of libpam-ssh! Cheers, /JP -- Jens Peter Secher jpsec...@gmail.com A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5098d115.6080...@gmail.com
Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debian packages
[I'm not subscribed, please Cc me on replies.] * Russ Allbery r...@debian.org, 2012-11-05, 12:46: what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my packages by using 'reportbug' ? Must I explicitly add 'Send-To: quid...@poivron.org' in debian/bug-control to avoid conflicts with Debian BTS ? I use Bugs: mailto:address as a source package header in debian/control instead. Does this actually work? According to bug #448493, it does not. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121106103722.ga7...@jwilk.net
Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debian packages
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes: [I'm not subscribed, please Cc me on replies.] * Russ Allbery r...@debian.org, 2012-11-05, 12:46: what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my packages by using 'reportbug' ? Must I explicitly add 'Send-To: quid...@poivron.org' in debian/bug-control to avoid conflicts with Debian BTS ? I use Bugs: mailto:address as a source package header in debian/control instead. Does this actually work? According to bug #448493, it does not. I'm using Bugs: mailto:address for packages in my personal repository, reportbug from squeeze does the right thing (I assume it works similarly in wheezy and sid too, I didn't test): , | algernon@galadriel:~$ reportbug syslog-ng-core | Warning: no reportbug configuration found. Proceeding in novice mode. | Detected character set: UTF-8 | Please change your locale if this is incorrect. | | Using 'Gergely Nagy alger...@madhouse-project.org' as your from address. | Getting status for syslog-ng-core... | Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org... | Unknown origin MadHouse; will send to syslog...@lists.balabit.hu. | Maintainer for syslog-ng-core is 'Gergely Nagy alger...@madhouse-project.org'. | Looking up dependencies of syslog-ng-core... ` #448493 seems to be about Bugs: address by the way, without the mailto:, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448493#21 -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nl36lrx.fsf@algernon.balabit
Bug#686070: marked as done (RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION])
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:01:25 +0100 with message-id 50990a25.5010...@gmail.com and subject line libpam-ssh: uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #686070, regarding RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 686070: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686070 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libpam-ssh * Package name: libpam-ssh Version : 1.92-15 Upstream Author : Wolfgang Rosenauer * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pam-ssh * License : BSD Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libpam-ssh - Authenticate using SSH keys To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libpam-ssh Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-ssh/libpam-ssh_1.92-15.dsc More information about libpam-ssh can be obtained from http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/ . This is an intermediate package with minimal changes, mainly Debian changes, in view to reintroduce it into Wheezy. Changes since the last upload: * Reintroduction release. (Closes: #685042, #664177) * New maintainer. * Fix rebuild issue caused by libtool. (Closes: #634577) * debian/rules sligtly clean up. Best regards, Jerome BENOIT ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Jérôme, Uploaded. In the future, remember to include DEP-3 headers in your patches: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ As for the VCS: I don't know mercurial either, but I'm sure we can learn. If you wish, I can advocate your collab-maint application. See: http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject You can send future libpam-ssh RFSes directly to me instead of or in addition to sponsorship-requests. Regards, Thibaut.---End Message---
Bug#692366: RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests owner thib...@debian.org tag 692366 + pending user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 692366 for-wheezy not-fit-fot-wheezy thanks Dear Bastien, The debdiff is enormous, because you have renamed patches and added a README.source, because you have decided to use gitpkg. Please revert the unnecessary changes. Remember that you will have to send a debdiff to the release team and explain the purpose of each change. A larger debdiff means more work for the release team and less chances for your package to be accepted in Wheezy. I'll sponsor this upload when it is ready. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQmSHUAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChANe8P/R59/meAZ1CxQwlGdwS/ga4/ ILQJ6vJpF/otaOU6wADbREgJxt46nDBmDWC4FRjRcR72YkhAkCsAsxJEI8OxrifD Vv7hnx/pwHZbBm18CLFiO8pf8CqRlg4HmhURXmTRPQOp5eigt7G0LJtXEuWsNzUX 9RiX0hEcsw4R0moyqMMeL75O+uC1BZFp7BHmBLxIfwiuLODsHc7QsD2xFB/wwXfz IUw9VeM02VIlJnxbAf2XbPbj8Fo8Qa1a2LROo9zYQojvh3tLez3sAv4AIjE4cEPW BoOvPDNgn3jKzABsVnBOp1vtBYA7pVbGXlbh2GerDczRD+3y+QSBYNzJ7L/csA46 Vleb/KyM9qfr0lzBvtvR/VqfUFd8xDl2wRV90JggWvgFEYZycl1UBmZT2teJgmcz ZB9tkq5vNLvuZ8wEwgkx5AnngJFmXECPeHHDIDvGWPVO419jyYrJQBkNzyGQtIEA 8VltfYRkEqHEfZKDCiTKvZEE41j9rEEAxRRX5hW12Gl8o/lCf4OuWblrtZ8ftBcH CTTrrNxIbZIYlJgXn1SPW//FVd1vH2MQuQ7z/rLXvCSsU5i/0+JSoH3GZE6sp6lo +2m1qrxmB+9bCGV9CnUb6cg7UTp50W0CI83fyZJynLLW/H2pt76Ic5jPr+PM0T/u M8IYEFUF2nDE4kaRBHGQ =Xiho -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509921de.1050...@debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package sponsorship-requests Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'sponsorship-requests' Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests' owner thib...@debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. tag 692366 + pending Bug #692366 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA] Added tag(s) pending. user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org Setting user to sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org (was thib...@debian.org). usertags 692366 for-wheezy not-fit-fot-wheezy There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: not-fit-fot-wheezy for-wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13522129792375.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#692366: RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package sponsorship-requests Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'sponsorship-requests' Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests' owner 692366 thib...@debian.org Bug #692366 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA] Owner recorded as thib...@debian.org. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13522135745883.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: kbibtex: block ITA 654750 by RFS 692366
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 654750 by 692366 Bug #654750 [wnpp] ITA: kbibtex -- BibTeX editor for KDE 654750 was not blocked by any bugs. 654750 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 654750: 692366 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135221883011336.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debian packages
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes: Does this actually work? According to bug #448493, it does not. Works For Me: windlord:~ apt-cache show svnlog | grep Bugs Bugs: mailto:r...@debian.org windlord:~ reportbug svnlog *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. *** Note: bug reports are publicly archived (including the email address of the submitter). Detected character set: UTF-8 Please change your locale if this is incorrect. Using 'Russ Allbery r...@debian.org' as your from address. Getting status for svnlog... Checking for newer versions at madison... Will use mailto protocol talking to r...@debian.org. Maintainer for svnlog is 'Russ Allbery r...@debian.org'. Looking up dependencies of svnlog... Briefly describe the problem (max. 100 characters allowed). This will be the [...] -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcdiwot8@windlord.stanford.edu
Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)
On 2012-10-19 10:23, Werner Jaeger wrote: Dear mentors, My sponsor is kil...@debian.org. I just uploaded the new version 1.0.9-1 of my package l2tp-ipsec-vpn. This upload contains RC bug fix #684962 [...] dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l2tp-ipsec-vpn/l2tp-ipsec-vpn_1.0.9-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Please CC me when replying to this message! Kind regards, Werner Jäger Hi, I had a look at it and the updated package appears to remove the debian changelog entry for 1.0.7-1 (which is the current version in sid). ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50997fb2.6060...@thykier.net
Bug#678037: marked as done (RFS: dbuskit/0.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:20:28 + with message-id e1tvx7s-0002md...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: dbuskit/0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #678037, regarding RFS: dbuskit/0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678037: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678037 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dbuskit. * Package name: dbuskit Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Niels Grewe niels.gr...@halbordnung.de * URL : http://gnustep.org * License : LGPL-2+ (library) GPL-3+ (tools and examples) GFDL-1.3+ (manual) Programming Lang: Objective-C Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libdbuskit-dev - GNUstep framework that interfaces with D-Bus (headers and documentation) libdbuskit0 - GNUstep framework that interfaces with D-Bus (runtime library) libdbuskit0-dbg - GNUstep framework that interfaces with D-Bus (debugging symbols) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbuskit/dbuskit_0.1-1.dsc ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package dbuskit has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#678150: marked as done (RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.1-1)
Your message dated Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:20:27 + with message-id e1tvx7r-0002m3...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #678150, regarding RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678150 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package projectcenter.app. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/projectcenter.app/projectcenter.app_0.6.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: projectcenter.app (0.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * debian/patches/gui-0.22.patch: Remove; fixed upstream. * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/copyright: Update copyright years, point to GPL-3. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package projectcenter.app has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)
Hi, unfortunately you're right. Is it OK. to upload it again, with only the changelog corrected, or do I also need a new version entry (l2tp-ipsec-vpn (1.0.9-1.1) unstable; urgency=low) in the changelog ? Thank you - Werner On 11/06/2012 10:22 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2012-10-19 10:23, Werner Jaeger wrote: Dear mentors, My sponsor is kil...@debian.org. I just uploaded the new version 1.0.9-1 of my package l2tp-ipsec-vpn. This upload contains RC bug fix #684962 [...] dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l2tp-ipsec-vpn/l2tp-ipsec-vpn_1.0.9-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Please CC me when replying to this message! Kind regards, Werner Jäger Hi, I had a look at it and the updated package appears to remove the debian changelog entry for 1.0.7-1 (which is the current version in sid). ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5099f8a8.4070...@web.de
