Re: Bug#726835: RFS: qgit/2.5-2 [RC]
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:40:10PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: How about bug report #641745? It looks easy fixable. I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview). Lintian show one tag, which is easy fixable as well: I: qgit: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry usr/share/applications/qgit.desktop I don't think the maintainer should, or even can, add Keywords to upstream .desktop files (as opposed to Categories). See also Whether the desktop file needs to have a Keywords line added is somewhat subjective. (from https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DesktopFileKeywords ). Patches are welcome (better send them directly to the upstream, I suppose). Also there are few bug reports on Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qgit They might be interesting for you. They are either wishlist or unreproducible on current version, so no. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#726881: RFS: speedpad/1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I found an old ITP, that became an RFP, and made a package for it. I think it's a nice game, to exercise the typing speed by copying fortunes. It's kinda similar to typespeed but makes you copy actual text, with a bit less pressure. The package is lintian clean. Is anyone interested in sponsoring it? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/speedpad/speedpad_1.0-1.dsc Bye -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11.3a (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131020072556.6574.1437.reportbug@localhost
Bug#726835: RFS: qgit/2.5-2 [RC]
Hi, How about bug report #641745? It looks easy fixable. I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview). Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment there. And do not forget to Cc the submitter: he will be able to write other arguments or he will agree with you. Lintian show one tag, which is easy fixable as well: I: qgit: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry usr/share/applications/qgit.desktop I don't think the maintainer should, or even can, add Keywords to upstream .desktop files (as opposed to Categories). Upstream does not provide the the .desktop file. You provide it in debian subdirectory: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qgit.git;a=blob;f=debian/qgit.desktop;hb=HEAD See also Whether the desktop file needs to have a Keywords line added is somewhat subjective. (from https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DesktopFileKeywords ). While it is not obligated, it is really easy to add one line in .desktop file to make few GNOME users more happy. Something like [1] should be enough I think. [1] Keywords=RevisionControlSystem;VCS;DCVS;git; Even in my system with KDE I see now: $ grep -R ^Keywords= /usr/share/applications/* | wc -l 28 Also there are few bug reports on Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qgit They might be interesting for you. They are either wishlist or unreproducible on current version, so no. Ok. So they might be commented and/or closed, right? Though it is a maintainer's decision to ignore or not ignore users of derivative distros. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87501382273...@web26g.yandex.ru
Bug#726873: RFS: id3/0.15-4
On 2013-10-20 Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package id3 [...] Hello, I have just uploaded the package. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131020132943.ga3...@downhill.g.la
Bug#726873: marked as done (RFS: id3/0.15-4)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Oct 2013 16:27:05 + with message-id e1vxvql-0007jx...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: id3/0.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #726873, regarding RFS: id3/0.15-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 726873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726873 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package id3 Package name: id3 Version : 0.15-4 Upstream Author : Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net URL : http://id3.googlecode.com/ License : GPLv2 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: id3 - Editor for ID3 tags To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/id3 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/id3/id3_0.15-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/control: - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.4 - Fixed description synopsis - Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields * Use debhelper 9 to get the correct CFLAGS * debian/patches/03-buildflags.patch: get build flags from dpkg-buildflags * Added lintian override because upstream does not provide a changelog Regards, -- Stefan Ott http://www.ott.net/ You are not Grey Squirrel? ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package id3 version 0.15-4 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/id3---End Message---
Watch file help needed
Hi, rel2gpx was moved to a new location http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 I tried to adapt the watch file to http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/rel2gpx.git;a=commitdiff;h=HEAD but this does not work as expected. Any hint? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131020172740.ga21...@an3as.eu
Re: Watch file help needed
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: but this does not work as expected. Any hint? 1. you have an extra . in your watchfile. The line should be http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 /sites/blog.velocarte66.fr/files//filepicker/1/rel2gpx_([v.\d]+)\.tgz instead of http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 /sites/blog.velocarte66.fr/files//filepicker/1/rel2gpx_([v.\d]+)\..tgz 2. The download links from that website are broken (they return a 404 not found error) -- Marius Gavrilescu pgp_HU4boW93V.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Watch file help needed
Hi Andreas, At the end of your line, you have this \..tgz, but it's \.tgz And the link http://blog.velocarte66.fr/sites/blog.velocarte66.fr/files//filepicker/1/rel2gpx_v027.tgz on the page is not found. Best regards. -- Cordialement, Blanc Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caogtle+5evfz2q+s5+1dg247dqwwjw252gqox10e9oh5atd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Watch file help needed
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 07:27:40PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, rel2gpx was moved to a new location http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 I tried to adapt the watch file to http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/rel2gpx.git;a=commitdiff;h=HEAD but this does not work as expected. Any hint? Yes, I suggest to use this : | version=3 | opts=uversionmangle=s/^(0)(\d\d)$/$1.$2/ \ | http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 \ | (?:|.*/)rel2gpx(?:[_\-]v?|)(\d[^\s/]*)\.(?:tar\.xz|txz|tar\.bz2|tbz2|tar\.gz|tgz) Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131020180844.ga19...@master.debian.org
Re: Bug#726835: RFS: qgit/2.5-2 [RC]
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 03:49:32PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview). Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment there. And do not forget to Cc the submitter: he will be able to write other arguments or he will agree with you. I've discussed this situation on #-devel on 2011-12-03 (tumbleweed was present). We couldn't decide anything useful though (apart from lindi not being able to reproduce the problem, see his mail at #611938). There were at that time at least #611938, #398999, #538093, since then there may be some new bugs opened and the same can be applied to any other package providing this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview (nowadays you probably can use codesearch.d.n to find all such packages). I guess I should just close this bug as MimeType: inode/directory should be present for apps acting as directory viewers and if that causes problems with DEs/file managers people should open bugs for them. Though all other similar bugs should be closed in the same manner too. Lintian show one tag, which is easy fixable as well: I: qgit: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry usr/share/applications/qgit.desktop I don't think the maintainer should, or even can, add Keywords to upstream .desktop files (as opposed to Categories). Upstream does not provide the the .desktop file. You provide it in debian subdirectory: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qgit.git;a=blob;f=debian/qgit.desktop;hb=HEAD All the more reasons not to touch Keywords then, I guess. See also Whether the desktop file needs to have a Keywords line added is somewhat subjective. (from https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DesktopFileKeywords ). While it is not obligated, it is really easy to add one line in .desktop file to make few GNOME users more happy. Something like [1] should be enough I think. [1] Keywords=RevisionControlSystem;VCS;DCVS;git; I have only a slight idea how is this field used in practice and I wouldn't test it but if you insist I can add this (after changing DCVS to DVCS and RevisionControlSystem to revision control system). Also there are few bug reports on Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qgit They might be interesting for you. They are either wishlist or unreproducible on current version, so no. Ok. So they might be commented and/or closed, right? Though it is a maintainer's decision to ignore or not ignore users of derivative distros. Huh? I don't care about bugs in Ubuntu much more than about bugs in RedHat. I also don't view myself as a maintainer of any packages in Ubuntu and never thought about doing corresponding work. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
build own web-gui
Howdy
I'm apology if this isn't correct list but I didn't found any way...
I need build my own webgui to run bash scripts on my server:
that scripts could be something like this (execute by root user):
#!/bin/bash
# pr.sh
#
/etc/postfix reload
So, I must create a gui do reload postfix service (and using it from
internet)
I can write a php script like this:
?php
$output = shell_exec('/root/bin/./pr.sh');
echo pre$output/pre;
?
But I'm afraid about security issue I've also ssl on apache web.
What is the best way to create a web security gui? Use post/put apache
commands? using php code?
Thanks for help!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/c90a0e9c909d4ad7a3a2e1396b530d6d.squir...@fuckaround.org
Bug#726835: RFS: qgit/2.5-2 [RC]
I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview). Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment there. And do not forget to Cc the submitter: he will be able to write other arguments or he will agree with you. I've discussed this situation on #-devel on 2011-12-03 (tumbleweed was present). We couldn't decide anything useful though (apart from lindi not being able to reproduce the problem, see his mail at #611938). There were at that time at least #611938, #398999, #538093, since then there may be some new bugs opened and the same can be applied to any other package providing this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview (nowadays you probably can use codesearch.d.n to find all such packages). I was not aware of that discussion and similar bug reports in other packages. Thanks for the links. I guess I should just close this bug as MimeType: inode/directory should be present for apps acting as directory viewers and if that causes problems with DEs/file managers people should open bugs for them. Though all other similar bugs should be closed in the same manner too. Yes, probably it will be better to close bug report with short description of the reason. Lintian show one tag, which is easy fixable as well: I: qgit: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry usr/share/applications/qgit.desktop I don't think the maintainer should, or even can, add Keywords to upstream .desktop files (as opposed to Categories). Upstream does not provide the the .desktop file. You provide it in debian subdirectory: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qgit.git;a=blob;f=debian/qgit.desktop;hb=HEAD All the more reasons not to touch Keywords then, I guess. I do not see the logic here. See also Whether the desktop file needs to have a Keywords line added is somewhat subjective. (from https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DesktopFileKeywords ). While it is not obligated, it is really easy to add one line in .desktop file to make few GNOME users more happy. Something like [1] should be enough I think. [1] Keywords=RevisionControlSystem;VCS;DCVS;git; I have only a slight idea how is this field used in practice and I wouldn't test it but if you insist I can add this (after changing DCVS to DVCS and RevisionControlSystem to revision control system). No problem here. Just add what you think is necessary. Also it is only a suggestion. I may upload your package even in current state, if you are strongly against of Keywords field. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/53211382298...@web23g.yandex.ru
Bug#726950: RFS: pidgin-privacy-please/0.7.1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-privacy-please * Package name: pidgin-privacy-please Version : 0.7.1-2 Upstream Author : Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net * URL : http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-privacy-please/ * License : GNU GPL Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-privacy-please - plugin for enhanced privacy in pidgin To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-privacy-please Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-privacy-please /pidgin-privacy-please_0.7.1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/control: - Bumped standards version to 3.9.4 - Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields - Build-dep on autotools-dev to have the autotools helper files updated * Use debhelper 9 to get the correct CFLAGS -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (650, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131020211540.15686.56221.report...@greebo.asti.ch
how to allocate a TCP port?
I am currently working on a way that computers with hardware random numbers generators can share random numbers with computers that do not have hardware random number generators. It looks like everything can be done with simple scripts so that no new low level source code needs to be written. All that seems to be needed is a xinet.d entry on the source, and a /etc/init.d/ entry and a bash script on the reciever. When I get it done and tested, I plan to submit it to the rng-tools people. Perhaps they will put it in contrib. Or perhaps I will make my own project. In any case, the sender and reciever need to share a privledged port. What is the official way of getting one of these allocated in /etc/services? Thank you. -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117 --- Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways around it. Edward Snowden signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: how to allocate a TCP port?
Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com writes: In any case, the sender and reciever need to share a privledged port. What is the official way of getting one of these allocated in /etc/services? https://www.iana.org/form/ports-services However, if by privileged port you mean a port number lower than 1024, note: User port numbers range between 1024 and 49151. If you wish to register a system port — those numbered 1023 or less — it must be done through the standardisation process of the IETF. In other words, you will need to write an RFC for your protocol and have it approved by the normal IETF process. (I think this is quite reasonable given how scarce such ports are.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gd77bs2@windlord.stanford.edu
Re: how to allocate a TCP port?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 04:39:09PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: https://www.iana.org/form/ports-services However, if by privileged port you mean a port number lower than 1024, note: User port numbers range between 1024 and 49151. If you wish to register a system port — those numbered 1023 or less — it must be done through the standardisation process of the IETF. In other words, you will need to write an RFC for your protocol and have it approved by the normal IETF process. (I think this is quite reasonable given how scarce such ports are.) The reason to make it privileged would be to prevent spoofing by non-privileged users. perhaps one of the crpto based authentication strategies, (ssh, ssl) would be better for the general case. But these are expensive of cpu cycles. -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117 --- Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways around it. Edward Snowden signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#710821: marked as done (RFS: mosh-scheme/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:29:50 + with message-id e1vy77m-0005tk...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mosh-scheme/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter has caused the Debian Bug report #710821, regarding RFS: mosh-scheme/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 710821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710821 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosh-scheme Package name: mosh Version : 0.2.7+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Taro Minowa hige...@users.sourceforge.jp URL : http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/ License : BSD-2-clause Section : lisp It builds those binary packages: mosh-doc- fast R6RS Scheme interpeter - reference documentation mosh-scheme - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mosh-scheme Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mosh-scheme/mosh-scheme_0.2.7+dfsg-1.dsc More information about Mosh can be obtained from http://mosh.monaos.org/ Please see my previous RFS mails for more information on the packaging: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660049 http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/msg00227.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/11/msg00549.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00253.html -- David Banks amoe...@gmail.com ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package mosh-scheme has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
