Bug#829408: RFS: img2pdf/0.2.0-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- Lossless conversion of raster images to PDF

[Sean Whitton]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 818617 by -1

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of img2pdf, fixing a stretch RC
bug (older than 7 days and no maintainer activity, and maintainer is
LowNMU).

I have verified this NMU in the following ways:

- fixes the bug(!)
- builds in clean sid chroot
- passes piuparts

* Package name: img2pdf
  Version : 0.2.0-1.1
  Upstream Author : Johannes Schauer 
* URL : https://gitlab.mister-muffin.de/josch/img2pdf
* License : LGPL-3
  Section : python

Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Add missing dependency on python3-pkg-resources (Closes: #818617).

Download with dget:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/img2pdf/img2pdf_0.2.0-1.1.dsc

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Bug#829405: RFS: glances/2.6.2-2

[Daniel Echeverry]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glances"

* Package name: glances
*  Version : 2.6.2-2
* Upstream Author : Nicolas Hennion (aka) Nicolargo 
* URL : https://github.com/nicolargo/glances
* License : LGPL-3.0+
*  Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

 glances- Curses-based monitoring tool
 glances-doc - Documentation for glances Curses-based monitoring tool

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/glances.git/

  More information about glances can be obtained from
https://github.com/nicolargo/glances

  Changes since the last upload:

  * debian/control
+ Add Breaks and Replaces field. (Closes: #826685)
  * debian/patches
+ Add reproducible-build.patch.
  + Make the build reproducible. (Closes: #827987)
+ Thanks to Chris Lamb for the patch!


 Regards,
 Daniel Echeverry


-- 
Daniel Echeverry
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://rinconinformatico.net
Linux user: #477840
Debian user

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

[Sean Whitton]

Hello,

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:27:06AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> 
> > > Relaxed dependency. Works for me.
> > I had at upstream's commit history and it seems that they have added
> > compatibility code so that it works with various versions of paredit.
> 
> Which commit?

86d8ab33c, 6eea8638a

-- 
Sean Whitton

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

[Sean Whitton]

Hello,

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:27:06AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > You should definitely forward the dependency relaxation upstream: they
> > shouldn't be declaring so tight a dependency if they have the
> > compatibility code.
> 
> It is not problem for MELPA, melpa ships 25beta. Who would benefit
> from forwarding?

Someone installing manually from GitHub.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

> I agree with your POV, lets see Andrey's opinion, I'm fine with the changes 
> now :)

Thanks for the review, Gianfranco.  If I may, I'd like to propose that
you upload the package as-is by the end of tomorrow (Sunday) even if
Andrey doesn't reply.  I'd really like to get these fixes uploaded ASAP.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#819396: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#819396: RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP])

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

you were lucky I used deferred.


dcutting and reuploading.

G.

Bug#819396: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#819396: RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP])

[Pali Rohár]

On Saturday 02 July 2016 19:51:07 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Hi, the package looks good.
> 
> uploaded, now that stormlib-listfiles is on its way for unstable (new
> queue)
> 
> G.

Now I'm just updated smpq package on mentors.debian.net. I moved 
libstorm-listfiles from Depends: to Recommends: as smpq can work without 
listfiles package, just is unable to unpack old archives. Also I added 
pgp check to watch...

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi,


>Hm, this is actually only needed for GNU/kFreeBSD, which uses -lncurses
>on the linking phase.  I updated Build-Depends to reflect that.


wonderful
>Yeah, it was just a simple sed command to remove things from all
>Makefiles.  But it seems I did not specify the right set of files to
>apply the substitutions.


ok

> [snip]

I agree with your POV, lets see Andrey's opinion, I'm fine with the changes now 
:)

Gianfranco

Bug#819396: marked as done (RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:46:03 +0200
with message-id <5777fddb.2030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#819396: RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #819396,
regarding RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
819396: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819396
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq"

 * Package name: smpq
   Version : 1.5-1
   Upstream Author : Pali Rohár 
 * URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

  kio-smpq   - KDE4 kio plugin for StormLib MPQ archiving utility
  smpq  - StormLib MPQ archiving utility

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/smpq


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smpq/smpq_1.5-1.dsc

More information about smpq can be obtained from https://launchpad.net/smpq.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release (Closes: #633931)


Regards,
 Pali Rohár


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

> Hi, the package looks good.

uploaded, now that stormlib-listfiles is on its way for unstable (new queue)

G.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#814865: marked as done (RFS: helm-synth/0.6.6-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:42:28 +0200
with message-id <5777fd04.6040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814865: RFS: helm-synth/0.6.2-3 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #814865,
regarding RFS: helm-synth/0.6.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814865
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "helm-synth"

* Package name: helm-synth
  Version : 0.6.2-3
  Upstream Author : Matt Tytel 
* URL : http://tytel.org/helm
* License : GPL-3.0
  Section : sound

It builds those binary packages:
  helm  - polyphonic synthesizer with realtime modulation feedback

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:http://mentors.debian.net/package/helm-synth


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/helm-synth/helm-synth_0.6.2-3.dsc

More information about helm can be obtained from http://tytel.org/helm

Regards,
Matt Tytel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

closing in the meanwhile, feel free to reopen when some work is done

G.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#818227: marked as done (RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation for the JVM)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:43:01 +0200
with message-id <5777fd25.9020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#818227: RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation 
for the JVM
has caused the Debian Bug report #818227,
regarding RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation for the JVM
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
818227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist


  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kawa"

 * Package name: kawa
   Version : 2.1-1
   Upstream Author : Per Bothner 
 * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/
 * License : MIT/X
   Section : lisp

  It builds those binary packages:

kawa  - general-purpose programming language that runs on the Java platform

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kawa


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kawa/kawa_2.1-1.dsc

  More information about kawa can be obtained from 
http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/

  
  I removed the documentation files from the upstream tarball, because lintian
  recognised them as non-free. After reading [1] and [2] I thought that was a 
good 
  idea. I plan to submit the doc files later as a separate non-free package.

  [1] https://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
  [2] https://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeFilesInOrigSources

  Regards,
   Andrea Bernardini
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
ENOANSWER in three months

Closing

G.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#818974: packaging

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi,

gpvdm ping

(I wrote a review on the bug, months ago)

G.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#816880: marked as done (RFS: ctmg/1.1-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:40:44 +0200
with message-id <5777fc9c.6040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#816880: RFS: ctmg/1.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #816880,
regarding RFS: ctmg/1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
816880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816880
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ctmg"

* Package name: ctmg
  Version : 1.1-1
  Upstream Author : Jason A. Donenfeld 
* URL : https://git.zx2c4.com/ctmg/
* License : ISC
  Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

  ctmg  - Simple wrapper around cryptsetup for encrypted containers

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/ctmg

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctmg/ctmg_1.1-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from 
https://git.zx2c4.com/ctmg/about/. ITP bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/816864


Regards,
  Iván Ruvalcaba
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
ENOANSWER in 3 months.

Closing



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

>>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded.  They
>
>>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>>
>>The changes are:
>>
>>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
>>  adjusting source files accordingly), and
>>
>>- Do not use -m32/-m64 when building.
>>
>>I have also updated the Vcs-* links in order to reflect the use of
>>collab-maint instead of my personal git server.
>>
>>I'm Cc'ing Andrey Rahmatullin on this message because he is the DD who
>>sponsored the package first, so I believe I should give him "precedence"
>>(also because I'd like to get DM rights on newlisp, so it's easier if I
>>work with just one person).
>
>
> sure, I won't upload it, unless Andrey asks me.
>
> I have just a few notes, from a quick review:
>
> 1) + libncurses5-dev
>
>
> why?

Hm, this is actually only needed for GNU/kFreeBSD, which uses -lncurses
on the linking phase.  I updated Build-Depends to reflect that.

> please explain the additional build dependency in changelog!

Done.

> 2)
> did you remove the -m32 and -m64 with some special sed command?

Yeah, it was just a simple sed command to remove things from all
Makefiles.  But it seems I did not specify the right set of files to
apply the substitutions.

> I ask, because you also patched some binaries in the source tree, and
> I'm mostly sure this isn't what you have to do:
> +diff --git a/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib 
> b/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib
> +index 3017a91..4e0eb2e 100755
> +--- a/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib
>  b/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib
>
>
> this, IIRC is some OSX special file, so I guess you better remove that file
> from the patch, since it is introducing really useless stuff.

Totally right, and this is actually a Windows binary used for testing.

> also, you have an ~1k LOC patch, where probably you would just need to patch
> two or three places
> (but if you got this patch upstream accepted I would leave it as-is)
>
> Otherwise I would avoid patching places such as
> +-(compile-recover "gcc -m32 ../util/ffitest.c -shared -o 
> ffitest.dylib")
> +-(compile-recover "gcc -m64 ../util/ffitest.c -shared -o 
> ffitest.dylib"))
>
>
> makefile_sunos*
> makefile_opensolaris*
> makefile_netbsd*
>
> and so on
>
> As a personal opinion, I would patch all of them only after getting them 
> accepted
> upstream, and in case they don't care about this, just patch the minimum set 
> of files/makefiles
> used in Debian/Linux/kFreeBSD builds.

Right, I only patched the GNU/{Linux,kFreeBSD} files now.  Thanks for
the heads up.

> Otherwise a 1k lines patch will be probably a nightmare to maintain/rebase on 
> new releases.

On the one hand, I see your point in maintaining a large patch on Debian
and rebasing it on every new release.  On the other hand, this patch
only touches the build system, which is unlikely to change much in the
near future.  Also, I am in touch with upstream and will propose all of
my local patches to them, so hopefully I won't need to carry anything
else for the next releases.

I've uploaded a new version of the package to mentors.d.n.  If you could
take a look, I'd appreciate!

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#822613: RFS: dynamic-graph/3.0.0-1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !

Hi,
lets see

>found information on 
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360 which seems to 
>suggest the problem was still contentious two years ago. Should I keep 
>overriding this warning?

I suggest to leave things as is

1) apt install check-all-the-things

codespell --quiet-level=3


^^ something that you might want to fix or report/ask upstream


2) grep copyright  . -Ri

many missing people

License: I know the license text can be just a link to common-licenses, but I 
still prefer
some brief explanation

https://codesearch.debian.net/results/License%3A%20LGPL-3/page_0

"the License, or (at your option) any later version."

3) missing a +, it seems an LGPL-3+ license


I like something like this


License: LGPL-3+
This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

Bug#828166: marked as done (RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:04:29 + (UTC)
with message-id <376828262.1366648.1467479069949.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828166,
regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
828166: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828166
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch"

* Package name: speedcrunch
  Version : 0.11-1
  Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others
* URL : http://speedcrunch.org
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : math

It builds those binary packages:

  speedcrunch - High precision calculator

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/speedcrunch

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/speedcrunch/speedcrunch_0.11-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

* New maintainer (closes: #826923).
* New upstream release (closes: #771440).
* debian/docs: update for new readme file.
* debian/patches: remove outdated patches.
* debian/speedcrunch.desktop: remove desktop file, upstream now includes
one.
* debian/control: Standards-Version, Vcs-*, update build dependencies.
* debian/install: PNG icon is now installed by upstream build process.
* debian/rules: adapt to changes in build system, make better use of dh
features, use Debian build flags.
* debian/menu: remove.
* debian/watch: update.
* Import .desktop file keywords from upstream (LP: #994190).

Regards,
Felix Krull
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Felix,

>Thanks for the reviews!


thanks to you for maintaining this package

>I'm not sure what you mean by that? But I extended the changelog somewhat.


https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
it is fine now :)

>I must say I'm a bit confused about how the Developer Reference suggests to 
>"concentrate on describing significant and user-visible changes," but the 
>informal >advice I've heard on changelog entries was always to be very 
>detailed and granular, which to me seems more like a job for VCS history than 
>a changelog.


I prefer the "better safe then sorry approach", but you are somewhat right :)

>That was backported from upstream, so not necessary. I added an Origin header 
>field to the patch to make that explicit (also changed to a more concise file 
>name).


wonderful

>Originally, "why not" :) But forcing CMake prevents dh from picking up the 
>.pro file in the same directory and using qmake. "--builddirectory" was, 
>indeed, >unnecessary.


wonderful.

not sure why do you prefer cmake over qmake, but I admit I prefer it too :)

(I find it more powerful than qmake, even if I really like them both)

>Good point, I changed it.


thanks


>(I'm assuming that uploading a new package with the same version is an 
>acceptable way to use mentors.d.n, mostly because it didn't stop me.)

exactly,

on its way for unstable

G.--- End Message ---

Bug#819395: marked as done (RFS: stormlib-listfiles/0~20150420-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:51:45 + (UTC)
with message-id <732265313.1345310.1467478305420.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#819395: RFS: stormlib-listfiles/2015-04-20-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #819395,
regarding RFS: stormlib-listfiles/0~20150420-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
819395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stormlib-listfiles"

 * Package name: stormlib-listfiles
   Version : 2015-04-20-1
   Upstream Author : Ladislav Zezula 
 * URL : http://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html
 * License : public-domain
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libstorm-listfiles - Library for accessing the MPQ archives (listfiles)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/stormlib-listfiles


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stormlib-listfiles/stormlib-listfiles_2015-04-20-1.dsc

More information about stormlib-listfiles can be obtained from 
http://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release (Closes: #819380)


Regards,
 Pali Rohár


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi

>Ok, I added description about generation of files in README.source file. 

>New package is uploaded on mentors.debian.net



ok, since you didn't understand what I asked you, I did it by myself
and uploaded on deferred/5.

I added this at the bottom of the copyright file:
License: public-domain
This file is in the public domain.  You may use and modify it as
you see fit, as long as this copyright message is included and
that there is an indication as to what modifications have been
made (if any).

I don't think this material is copyrightable, and for sure IANAL.

So, since there is a missing LICENSE file in upstream tarball, I'll
leave as is and let ftpmasters have the final decision of the matter.

Uploading the attached tarball.

G.


stormlib-listfiles_0~20150420-1.debian.tar.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---

Bug#825532: marked as done (RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:44:26 + (UTC)
with message-id <747722351.1323338.1467477866277.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #825532,
regarding RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
825532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: sponsorship-requests
severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com, max.c...@gmail.com, 073p...@gmail.com

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev"

 * Package name: shadowsocks-libev
   Version : 2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
   Upstream Author : Max Lv 
 * URL : http://www.shadowsocks.org
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

 libshadowsocks-dev - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy (development files)
 libshadowsocks1 - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy (shared library)
 shadowsocks-libev - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/shadowsocks-libev

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shadowsocks-libev/shadowsocks-libev_2.4.6+20160526+ds-1.dsc

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

>So I re-package the latest upstream, with the changes below:
>- update version
>- add license info under man/ folder

>- add lintian-overrides (2 false positive)

I would prefer to fix the manpage license (I guess it is just a matter
of case-sensitiveness) and don't care about the watch lintian override.

But if you want to keep them, you are free to do so, just remember to remove
them once the two Debian bugs are fixed.

Sponsored,


G.--- End Message ---

Bug#829012: marked as done (RFS: udftools/1.2-1 [NMU] [RC])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:31:45 + (UTC)
with message-id <1723375344.1329501.1467477105362.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829012: RFS: udftools/1.2-0.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #829012,
regarding RFS: udftools/1.2-1 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
829012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829012
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"

 * Package name: udftools
   Version : 1.2-0.1
   Upstream Author : Pali Rohár 
 * URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
 * License : GPL-2.0+
   Section : otherosfs

It builds those binary packages:

  udftools   - tools for UDF filesystems and DVD/CD-R(W) drives

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/udftools


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udftools/udftools_1.2-0.1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from 
https://mentors.debian.net/package/udftools.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * New project upstream (Closes: #791952).
  * New upstream release:
Closes: #672839, #272648, #606664, #715720, #716102, #716287, #727634
Closes: #727636, #775273, #539530, #680272
  * Checks for /run/udev in init script (Closes: #622208).
  * Fix LSB output in init script (Closes: #823084, #583382).
  * Use debhelper 9 and update debian files (Closes: #817705).
  * Remove old and unused po.bak files.
  * Remove old README.Debian.


Regards,
 Pali Rohár


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Pali


>I updated udftools package, new version is on mentors.debian.net. Let me 

>know if it is OK now.



I am really satisfied with your packaging/cleanup/maintaining upstream for the 
package,
and I had just two thing to change,

-udftools (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=high
+udftools (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low

-  * QA upload.
* New maintainer (Closes: #829016).
* New project upstream (Closes: #791952).
* New upstream release which fixes these bugs:

changes are huge, so I prefer some 10 days migration, this will make the 
package disappear from testing
for a few days, but I prefer to avoid a package removed from testing instead of 
an untested new package
going in just to keep autoremoval silent.

I hope you will agree, I uploaded the package on deferred/4, but if you agree 
with me I can move to deferred/0

Moving to deferred/0 will mean the package go from testing for 8 days, assuming 
no new RC bugs are found


I also removed the QA upload, if you want to maintain it it becomes useless :)

BTW for a new release, plaese fix:
W: udftools: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/udftools/COPYING.gz
I: udftools: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man1/cdrwtool.1.gz 
formating formatting


Not big issues, they weren't preventing the sponsoring as is

thanks for the nice work!

(Debian directory for the sponsored package attached)

Gianfranco


udftools_1.2-1.debian.tar.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---

Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 [ITP]

[Roger Shimizu]

Control: retitle -1 RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-1 [ITP]

Dear G,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
 wrote:
>
>>Way 1:
>>Since all manpages is created by Max (co-maintainer of this package,
>>and in CC list), we can ask him to relicense, according to [2]
>>
>>[2] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/gfdlinvariant
>>
>>I think Way 1 is better.
>>What do you think?
>
>
> +1 for way 1!

Thanks for your recommend!
I sent PR to upstream to change the license, and it's acceepted.

So I re-package the latest upstream, with the changes below:
- update version
- add license info under man/ folder
- add lintian-overrides (2 false positive)

Uploaded to mentors, and source code to github:
  https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +2 Cape Town (in DebConf16)
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Bug#829333: RFS: gntp-send/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Kentaro Hayashi]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gntp-send"

 * Package name: gntp-send
   Version : 0.3.4-1
   Upstream Author : Yasuhiro Matsumoto 
 Peter Sinnott 
 Dither 
 * URL : https://github.com/mattn/gntp-send
 * License : BSD-3-clause
   Section : net

  It builds those binary packages:

gntp-send  - Command line application to send growl message with GNTP

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gntp-send

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gntp-send/gntp-send_0.3.4-1.dsc

  More information about gntp-send can be obtained from 
https://github.com/mattn/gntp-send

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial upload to Debian (Closes: #829331)
  * debian/changelog
- Removed past release changelog entries which are originally
  maintained by Yasuhiro Matsumoto who is upstream author of
  gntp-send. Those entries are just maintained to provide
  packages on Launchpad PPA.
  ref. https://launchpad.net/~mattn/+archive/ubuntu/gntp-send
  * debian/watch
- Supported to watch upstream.
  * debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
- Supported cryptographic signature.
  * debian/upstream/metadata
- Added metadata about gntp-send package
  * debian/rules
- Enabled hardening compile flags.
- Supported multiarch.

Regards,
 Kentaro Hayashi



pgp3sEP8hBORv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Job Opportunity.....Register Now and Get Paid

[Opinion Outpost]

 - This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -

We have a Customer Service Survey Assignment in your location.We will pay $200 
per assignment which would come in the form of a cashiers check  along with 
comprehensive details in regards to your assignment. Kindly
CLICK HERE
to read  more and sign Up if interested.
Best Regards,
David Rose
Opinion Outpost®

Re: Bug#819395: RFS: stormlib-listfiles/2015-04-20-1 [ITP]

[Pali Rohár]

Ok, I added description about generation of files in README.source file. 
New package is uploaded on mentors.debian.net

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#829012: RFS: udftools/1.2-0.1 [NMU] [RC]

[Pali Rohár]

I updated udftools package, new version is on mentors.debian.net. Let me 
know if it is OK now.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: pause command line utility

[Jakub Wilk]

* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-07-02, 03:45:

#include 

int main (void)
{
return pause();
}

Is there any standard utility for it?


$ perl -MPOSIX -e pause

--
Jakub Wilk

Re: pause command line utility

[Dmitry Bogatov]

> >I expect tail -f /dev/null to be close enough in behavior to
> >pause(3), even though it does something else internally.

> yes, indeed even if it might be not the best in efficiency [1]
> somebody suggested "sleep inf" or "sleep infinity".

Also great. But some implementations of sleep do not support floating
number.

-- 
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff
Accept-Language: eo,en,ru
X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io

Re: pause command line utility

[Dmitry Bogatov]

> > I need pause utility to keep gpg-agent in foreground:
> > gpg-agent --use-standard-socket --daemon ./pause
> >=20
> > Something like following C program:
> >=20
> > #include 
> >=20
> > int main (void)
> > {
> > return pause();
> > }
> >=20
> > Is there any standard utility for it?
>
> I expect tail -f /dev/null to be close enough in behavior to
> pause(3), even though it does something else internally.

Brilliant! Thank you.

-- 
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff
Accept-Language: eo,en,ru
X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

control: tags -1 moreinfo


>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded.  They

>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>
>The changes are:
>
>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
>  adjusting source files accordingly), and
>
>- Do not use -m32/-m64 when building.
>
>I have also updated the Vcs-* links in order to reflect the use of
>collab-maint instead of my personal git server.
>
>I'm Cc'ing Andrey Rahmatullin on this message because he is the DD who
>sponsored the package first, so I believe I should give him "precedence"
>(also because I'd like to get DM rights on newlisp, so it's easier if I
>work with just one person).


sure, I won't upload it, unless Andrey asks me.

I have just a few notes, from a quick review:

1) + libncurses5-dev


why?


please explain the additional build dependency in changelog!

2)
did you remove the -m32 and -m64 with some special sed command?

I ask, because you also patched some binaries in the source tree, and
I'm mostly sure this isn't what you have to do:
+diff --git a/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib b/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib
+index 3017a91..4e0eb2e 100755
+--- a/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib
 b/qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib


this, IIRC is some OSX special file, so I guess you better remove that file
from the patch, since it is introducing really useless stuff.

also, you have an ~1k LOC patch, where probably you would just need to patch
two or three places
(but if you got this patch upstream accepted I would leave it as-is)

Otherwise I would avoid patching places such as
+-(compile-recover "gcc -m32 ../util/ffitest.c -shared -o 
ffitest.dylib")
+-(compile-recover "gcc -m64 ../util/ffitest.c -shared -o 
ffitest.dylib"))


makefile_sunos*
makefile_opensolaris*
makefile_netbsd*

and so on

As a personal opinion, I would patch all of them only after getting them 
accepted
upstream, and in case they don't care about this, just patch the minimum set of 
files/makefiles
used in Debian/Linux/kFreeBSD builds.

Otherwise a 1k lines patch will be probably a nightmare to maintain/rebase on 
new releases.

Just my .02$, of course I tagged moreinfo, but Andrey might have a different 
opinion...

cheers!

Gianfranco

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

[Dmitry Bogatov]

> > Relaxed dependency. Works for me.
> I had at upstream's commit history and it seems that they have added
> compatibility code so that it works with various versions of paredit.

Which commit?

> You should definitely forward the dependency relaxation upstream: they
> shouldn't be declaring so tight a dependency if they have the
> compatibility code.

It is not problem for MELPA, melpa ships 25beta. Who would benefit
from forwarding?

-- 
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff
Accept-Language: eo,en,ru
X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io