Bug#871624: RFS: sxiv/1.3.2-2

[Daniel Echeverry]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sxiv"

* Package name: sxiv
* Version : 1.3.2-2
* Upstream Author : Bert Münnich
* URL : https://github.com/muennich/sxiv
* License : GPL-2.0+
* Section : graphics

It builds those binary packages:

sxiv  - simple X image viewer

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sxiv

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_1.3.2-2.dsc

More information about sxiv can be obtained from
https://github.com/muennich/sxiv.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Fix FTCBFS Let dh_auto_build pass
cross compilers to make. (Closes: #871393).
+ Thanks to Helmut Grohne for the patch!.
  * debian/control
+ Bump standard versions 4.0.0 (no changes).
+ Bump debhelper to 10 in B-D.
+ Switch compat level 9 to 10.
  * debian/copyright
+ Extend debian copyright holders years.
  * debian/rules
+ export hardening flags.


Regards,

-- 
Daniel Echeverry
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://rinconinformatico.net
Linux user: #477840
Debian user

Bug#871614: marked as done (RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:03:25 +0200
with message-id <20170810010325.dztfr4bbphnnk...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#871614: RFS: 
rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #871614,
regarding RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
871614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar"

 * Package name: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
   Version : 0.17.4-1
  Upstream Author : David Mohammed 
* URL : https://github.com/fossfreedom/alternative-toolbar
* License : GPL3+
   Section : misc

  It builds those binary packages:

rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar - Enhanced play controls and
interface for Rhythmbox

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar_0.17.4-1.dsc

Notes:

Package checked via lintian -i -I on the built changes file.
check-all-the-things run


  Changes since the last upload:


  * New upstream release
- latest translations
- show source toolbar for radio and podcasts
- allow playqueue reordering of songs
- fix display of header category labels
- cope with environments that don't set XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
  * Packaging Changes.
- debian/control standards-version changed to 4.0.0
  debhelper changed to 10 and removed the now unnecessary
  dh_autoreconf build dependency
- debian/copyright - extend copyright year
- reworked debian/rules so that postrm and prerm files are no
  longer required


  Regards,
   David Mohammed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:21:44PM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
>  * Package name: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
>Version : 0.17.4-1

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   * New upstream release
> - latest translations
> - show source toolbar for radio and podcasts
> - allow playqueue reordering of songs
> - fix display of header category labels
> - cope with environments that don't set XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
>   * Packaging Changes.
> - debian/control standards-version changed to 4.0.0
>   debhelper changed to 10 and removed the now unnecessary
>   dh_autoreconf build dependency
> - debian/copyright - extend copyright year
> - reworked debian/rules so that postrm and prerm files are no
>   longer required

I'd have a nitpick: you don't mention changes to python dependencies, which
result in allowing a cross-arch python, but meh.

Uploaded!

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ James Damore is a hero.  Even mild criticism of bigots these days
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ comes at great personal risk.
⠈⠳⣄ --- End Message ---

Bug#858531: marked as done (RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 09 Aug 2017 22:20:18 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #858531,
regarding RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
858531: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858531
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "delight"

* Package name : delight
  Version  : 1.5-1
  Upstream Author  : Phil Sainty 
* Url  : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/delight
* Licenses : GPL-3+
  Programming Lang : Emacs Lisp
  Section  : lisp

 Emacs add-on 'delight' provides functionality to customise the
 mode names displayed in the mode line.
 .
 For major modes, the buffer-local `mode-name' variable is modified.
 For minor modes, the associated value in `minor-mode-alist' is set.

It builds those binary packages:

  * elpa-delight

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/delight

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/delight/delight_1.5-1.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/delight.git

More information about delight can be obtained from
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/delight

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package delight has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Bug#871614: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1

[foss.freedom]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar"

 * Package name: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
   Version : 0.17.4-1
  Upstream Author : David Mohammed 
* URL : https://github.com/fossfreedom/alternative-toolbar
* License : GPL3+
   Section : misc

  It builds those binary packages:

rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar - Enhanced play controls and
interface for Rhythmbox

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar_0.17.4-1.dsc

Notes:

Package checked via lintian -i -I on the built changes file.
check-all-the-things run


  Changes since the last upload:


  * New upstream release
- latest translations
- show source toolbar for radio and podcasts
- allow playqueue reordering of songs
- fix display of header category labels
- cope with environments that don't set XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
  * Packaging Changes.
- debian/control standards-version changed to 4.0.0
  debhelper changed to 10 and removed the now unnecessary
  dh_autoreconf build dependency
- debian/copyright - extend copyright year
- reworked debian/rules so that postrm and prerm files are no
  longer required


  Regards,
   David Mohammed

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that).
> 
> Now I have to ask for the option needed for lintian to tell that.
It only tells that in the description of tag which is emitted when there
is no header at all.

> > doc/manual.html says it's autogenerated from a LyX source yet the source
> > and a way to regenerate it from that source are not included. This is a
> > DFSG violation.
> It's not auto-generated, but generated. I use LyX as my editor, it saves
> the file in an internal format, and I export it to html.
> I don't see any violation to DFSG §2, which is the closes to the subject.
Are you editing .html directly?

> > The same for cyclograph/qt/cyclograph_rc.py which is pyrcc5-generated.
> I agree more on this, because the resource file is a kind of binary /
> obfuscated code. It contains only artworks and the same html files used
> by cyclograph-gtk3. If the generation process has to be done in debian
> I don't think a new upstream release can be avoided, because the file
> needed to build the resource file is not distributed in the tar.
Sure, that's what I've said.

> We'll try to have the package working with no resource file installed at all,
I don't think it's possible or a good idea, but whatever.
> but would it be acceptable to have it in the source package or a repack
> would be needed?
Sourceless files shouldn't be in the source package even if they are not
used.

> > The GUIs still have a "Check online" checkbox which is even on by default
> > even if it has no effect, it should be hidden.
> Ok, thanks for the care you are giving to this package.
> To fix this a patch or a new upstream release is required. Are both options
> acceptable?
Which both options?

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries

[Rodrigo]

Hi Fred,

> I didn't check deep but I can see that the packaging is not following
> the latest policy manual (newer-standards-version) : have a look to this
> document (
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt )
> to fix this ; 
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Standards-Version


I've checked and the current Standards-Version is the latest: 4.0.0

> Also, could you make the debian/watch file work please ?
The watch file is working now. I uploaded the package to debian/mentors 
again after these changes.


Thanks,

Rodrigo R. Galvão

Bug#866601: RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP: #864710]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:42:40AM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking
> dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another
> debian maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong?
Yes, .install is better than manually invoking dh_install.
You also didn't comment on the manual link creation.


-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#866601: RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP: #864710]

[Jørgen Kvalsvik]

The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking 
dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another debian 
maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong?

From: Andrey Rahmatullin 
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 8:53:38 PM
To: Jørgen Kvalsvik
Cc: 866...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#866601: RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP: #864710]

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:38:13AM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> >  Why is the lib installed by code in debian/rules? The upstream build
> > system should do that and it seems it does that, at least partially.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand what this means, can you point me to an example?
Example of what?
I mean the debian/rules lines which copy .so.* and .a and make the .so
link. Usually this is done by make install.

--
WBR, wRAR


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you