Bug#958364: marked as done (Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library)
Your message dated Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:13:48 -0400 with message-id <1eedcac6a22c81eb76825427316acdc3f6625c8b.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#958364: Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library has caused the Debian Bug report #958364, regarding Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 958364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958364 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtpms" * Package name: libtpms Version : 0.8.0~dev1-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/kkamagui-guest/libtpms Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libtpms0 - TPM emulation library libtpms-dev - libtpms header files and man pages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libtpms Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libt/libtpms/libtpms_0.8.0~dev1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #958071) * Updated standards version to 4.5.0 in debian/control * Updated debhelper version to 12 in debian/control * Added Rules-Requires-Root to debian/control * Added Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git to debian/control * Removed autotools-dev and dh-autoreconf from debian/control * Removed autotools-dev and parallel option from debian/rules * Converted debian/copyright to dep5-copyright format * Added debian/watch file * Added debian/libtpms.symbols file * Added debian/upstream/metadata file * Changed section of man pages from 1 to 3 * Fixed typos and a long line warning in man pages * Set date of man pages to last changelog entry Regards, -- Seunghun Han --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- 在 2020-04-22星期三的 08:32 +0900，Seunghun Han写道： > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > Hi Boyuan, > > Thank you for your kind advice. I have fixed all issues according to > your advice and uploaded it to mentors.debian.org again [1]. > [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libtpms > > Would you check and sponsor it? If there are things I have missed, > please let me know. Overall it's looking good, I am uploading it. Some minor advice: * Please consider installing /usr/lib/*/libtpms.a in the -dev package. Someone may prefer using the static library for their development. The package will have to go through the NEW queue for manual review. You will receive the result later through e-mail when the review finishes. -- Cheers, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#958432: RFS: libgadu/1:1.12.2-5 [QA] -- Gadu-Gadu protocol library
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgadu" * Package name: libgadu Version : 1:1.12.2-5 Upstream Author : * URL : http://toxygen.net/libgadu/ * License : LGPL-2.1 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libgadu Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgadu3 - Gadu-Gadu protocol library - runtime files libgadu-dev - Gadu-Gadu protocol library - development files libgadu-doc - Gadu-Gadu protocol library - documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgadu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgadu/libgadu_1.12.2-5.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Fix FTBFS with gcc-10. (Closes: #957441) * Use debhelper-commit. - Update compat level to 12. - Remove dependency on dh-autoreconf - Remove autoreconf and parallel from rules. - Adjust doc location. * Exclude md5 from doc package. * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0 * Mark Vcs to salsa. - Remove old gbp.conf -- Regards Sudip
Bug#958435: RFS: runescape/0.8-1 [RC] -- Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runescape" * Package name: runescape Version : 0.8-1 Upstream Author : Jagex Games Ltd. * URL : https://oldschool.runescape.com * License : BSD-2-Clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/runescape Section : non-free/games It builds those binary packages: runescape - Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/runescape Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/r/runescape/runescape_0.8-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. (Closes: #953487, #956275, #956276) * debian/control: + Added in Depends: kdialog | zenity, p7zip-full. + Long description with more details improved. * Added debian/docs. * debian/tests/control: Added in Depends: kdialog | zenity, p7zip-full. Regards, -- Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
Bug#958364: Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi Boyuan,
Thank you for your kind advice. I have fixed all issues according to
your advice and uploaded it to mentors.debian.org again [1].
[1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libtpms
Would you check and sponsor it? If there are things I have missed,
please let me know.
Best regards,
Seunghun
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:33 AM Boyuan Yang wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> Hi Seunghun,
>
> Thanks for working on libtpms packaging in Debian and taking over maintenance.
> I sponsored the previous upload at
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libtpms_0.7.0-1.html .
>
> After looking into your packaging, I think there are some issues as listed
> below. Please consider solving them and remove the "moreinfo" tag afterwards.
>
> * This one is critical: With new package, *NEVER* override dh_usrlocal in
> debian/rules file. Debian package should not ship files under /usr/local/. If
> there are special reasons about handling /usr/local/, I'd be happy to know it.
>
> * Please consider using "include /usr/share/dpkg/architecture.mk" instead of
> manual invocation of dpkg-architecture to get the value of DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
> variable in debian/rules file.
>
> * The "--with autoreconf" parameter is useless now since it is the default for
> debhelper compatibility level 12.
>
> * Please strip all old changelogs entries from debian/changelog; those old
> parts are not part of Debian.
>
> * This one is also critical: Please do not list ${misc:Pre-Depends} in the
> Depends: field of libtpms0. Normally this variable substitution is not needed
> now; if you really needed, please use "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}"
> instead.
>
> * With your current debian/*.install files, there are absolutely no necessity
> to build-depends on dh-exec. Please remove such dependency and remove
> corresponding shebang in *.install files.
>
> Let me know after you finish all those tweaks or if you have any questions.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Boyuan Yang
>
> 在 2020-04-21星期二的 07:55 +0900，Seunghun Han写道：
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtpms"
> >
> > * Package name: libtpms
> >Version : 0.8.0~dev1-1
> >Upstream Author : Stefan Berger
> > * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms
> > * License : BSD-3-clause
> > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/kkamagui-guest/libtpms
> >Section : libs
> >
> > It builds those binary packages:
> >
> > libtpms0 - TPM emulation library
> > libtpms-dev - libtpms header files and man pages
> >
> > To access further information about this package, please visit the
> > following URL:
> >
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/libtpms
> >
> > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> >
> > dget -x
> > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libt/libtpms/libtpms_0.8.0~dev1-1.dsc
> >
> > Changes since the last upload:
> >
> >* New maintainer (Closes: #958071)
> >* Updated standards version to 4.5.0 in debian/control
> >* Updated debhelper version to 12 in debian/control
> >* Added Rules-Requires-Root to debian/control
> >* Added Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git to debian/control
> >* Removed autotools-dev and dh-autoreconf from debian/control
> >* Removed autotools-dev and parallel option from debian/rules
> >* Converted debian/copyright to dep5-copyright format
> >* Added debian/watch file
> >* Added debian/libtpms.symbols file
> >* Added debian/upstream/metadata file
> >* Changed section of man pages from 1 to 3
> >* Fixed typos and a long line warning in man pages
> >* Set date of man pages to last changelog entry
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Seunghun Han
> >
Bug#958428: RFS: fdkaac/1.0.0-1 [RC] -- command line encoder frontend for libfdk-aac
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: block 955248 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fdkaac" * Package name: fdkaac Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : nu774 * URL : https://github.com/nu774/fdkaac * License : Zlib * Vcs : https://git.ieval.ro/?p=fdkaac.git Section : sound It builds those binary packages: fdkaac - command line encoder frontend for libfdk-aac To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fdkaac Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/f/fdkaac/fdkaac_1.0.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version. Thanks Håvard Flaget Aasen. for noticing. (Closes: #955248) * Bump Standards-Version to 4.0.1 (no changes required). Yes, this is still an ancient standards version, but it's slightly less ancient. - Marius Gavrilescu
Bug#958364: Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi Seunghun,
Thanks for working on libtpms packaging in Debian and taking over maintenance.
I sponsored the previous upload at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libtpms_0.7.0-1.html .
After looking into your packaging, I think there are some issues as listed
below. Please consider solving them and remove the "moreinfo" tag afterwards.
* This one is critical: With new package, *NEVER* override dh_usrlocal in
debian/rules file. Debian package should not ship files under /usr/local/. If
there are special reasons about handling /usr/local/, I'd be happy to know it.
* Please consider using "include /usr/share/dpkg/architecture.mk" instead of
manual invocation of dpkg-architecture to get the value of DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
variable in debian/rules file.
* The "--with autoreconf" parameter is useless now since it is the default for
debhelper compatibility level 12.
* Please strip all old changelogs entries from debian/changelog; those old
parts are not part of Debian.
* This one is also critical: Please do not list ${misc:Pre-Depends} in the
Depends: field of libtpms0. Normally this variable substitution is not needed
now; if you really needed, please use "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}"
instead.
* With your current debian/*.install files, there are absolutely no necessity
to build-depends on dh-exec. Please remove such dependency and remove
corresponding shebang in *.install files.
Let me know after you finish all those tweaks or if you have any questions.
--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang
在 2020-04-21星期二的 07:55 +0900，Seunghun Han写道：
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtpms"
>
> * Package name: libtpms
>Version : 0.8.0~dev1-1
>Upstream Author : Stefan Berger
> * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms
> * License : BSD-3-clause
> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/kkamagui-guest/libtpms
>Section : libs
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libtpms0 - TPM emulation library
> libtpms-dev - libtpms header files and man pages
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libtpms
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libt/libtpms/libtpms_0.8.0~dev1-1.dsc
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>* New maintainer (Closes: #958071)
>* Updated standards version to 4.5.0 in debian/control
>* Updated debhelper version to 12 in debian/control
>* Added Rules-Requires-Root to debian/control
>* Added Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git to debian/control
>* Removed autotools-dev and dh-autoreconf from debian/control
>* Removed autotools-dev and parallel option from debian/rules
>* Converted debian/copyright to dep5-copyright format
>* Added debian/watch file
>* Added debian/libtpms.symbols file
>* Added debian/upstream/metadata file
>* Changed section of man pages from 1 to 3
>* Fixed typos and a long line warning in man pages
>* Set date of man pages to last changelog entry
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Seunghun Han
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: A question about uscan and MUT with different versions
Hi Leopold, > However, when I push it to salsa and run ci, the command executed is this: > > uscan --download --download-current-version > > and fails because the "data" modules has different version number that > the original main or this is what I understand [2]. > > Some of you knows how to manage this situation or complete the watch > file to make it works? I think the real problem is on line 123: > gbp:error: upstream/1.6.0+ds1 is not a valid treeish You've probably forgotten to push that tag. With that tag present, gbp can recreate the .orig.tar files using pristine-tar and then origtargz won't try to use uscan at all. FWIW, the --download-current-version option does indeed not work for MUT packages with different version numbers; the package only has one current version. Regards, Robin
Bug#954050: RFS: persist-el/0.4+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- persist variables between Emacs Sessions
Hi Nicholas, I just uploaded persist-el. Thank you and sorry for the delay. This was my first sponsorship and I also had to setup a new laptop. I'm just waiting for the confirmation mail for the upload. There are a few nitpicks and I'd be grateful if you could track them, e.g. in bugs.d.o after the package enters the archive: - It's a pity that we can not include the info file due to the license. Could you ask upstream to consider another license? - As long as the doc is not included, I think you don't need to build depend on texinfo. - If upstream also uses Git, I prefer to track upstreams master branch as upstream branch in the packaging repo. You could still merge their branch in your existing repo or restart the repo? - Lintian also had two nitpicks, see below. I'm guilty of the "wrong" section myself for elpa-editorconfig. What is the teams stand on this? Cheers, Thomas I: persist-el source: public-upstream-key-not-minimal upstream/signing-key.asc has 1 extra signature(s) for keyid 066DAFCB81E42C40 N: N:The package contains a public upstream signing key with extra N:signatures. The signatures are unnecessary and take up space in the N:archive. N: N:Please export the upstream key again with the command: N: N: $ gpg --armor --export --export-options export-minimal,export-clean N: N:and use that key instead of the key currently in the source package. N: N:Refer to the uscan(1) manual page for details. N: N:Severity: info N: N:Check: debian/upstream/signing-key N: I: elpa-persist: wrong-section-according-to-package-name elpa-persist => lisp N: N:This package has a name suggesting that it belongs to a section other N:than the one it is currently categorized in. N: N:Severity: info N: N:Check: fields/section N: > Nicholas D Steeves hat am 11. April 2020 12:31 > geschrieben: > > > Hi Thomas and Sébastien, > > #947017 "ITP: org-drill" is blocked by this RFS (#954050) for a > required dependency (persist-el). Please sponsor at your earliest > convenience to we
Bug#958412: RFS: bbrun/1.6-8 [QA] -- tool for the blackbox/fluxbox window managers that runs commands
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bbrun" * Package name: bbrun Version : 1.6-8 Upstream Author : Josh King * URL : http://www.darkops.net/bbrun/ * License : GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bbrun Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: bbrun - tool for the blackbox/fluxbox window managers that runs commands To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bbrun Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bbrun/bbrun_1.6-8.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Fix FTBFS with GCC-10. (Closes: #957033) * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0 * Use debhelper-compat. - Update compat level to 12. * Simplify debian/rules. - Add debian/mapages file. * Mark Vcs link to salsa. -- Regards Sudip
A question about uscan and MUT with different versions
Hi, I have some trouble with the soqt package [1]. This package upstream have released with three modules: main, data and gui. If you clone the repo and process uscan with: uscan --verbose --force-download --copy it will download the corresponding files and create: soqt_1.6.0+ds1.orig.tar.xz soqt_1.6.0+ds1.orig-data.tar.xz soqt_1.6.0+ds1.orig-sogui.tar.xz However, when I push it to salsa and run ci, the command executed is this: uscan --download --download-current-version and fails because the "data" modules has different version number that the original main or this is what I understand [2]. Some of you knows how to manage this situation or complete the watch file to make it works? Thanks, Leopold [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/soqt/ [2] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/soqt/-/jobs/685582 -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia - A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#958383: RFS: kas/2.0-1 [ITP] -- Setup tool for bitbake based projects
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kas". * Package name: kas Version : 2.0-1 Upstream Author : Jan Kiszka * URL : https://github.com/siemens/kas * License : Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/kas Section : devel It builds those binary packages: kas - Setup tool for bitbake based projects To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/kas Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kas/kas_2.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #956123) Regards, Bastian Germann
Bug#958378: RFS: libsieve/2.2.6-3 [QA] -- library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsieve" * Package name: libsieve Version : 2.2.6-3 Upstream Author : Aaron Stone * URL : http://libsieve.sf.net * License : MIT and LGPL * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libsieve Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsieve2-dev - library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail libsieve2-1 - library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsieve Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsieve/libsieve_2.2.6-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Mark format as 3.0 * Fix FTBFS. (Closes: #957479) * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0 * Use debhelper-compat. - Update compat level to 12. * Simplify debian/rules. - Rename override to lintian-overrides. * Fix install files to use mutiarch locations. * Remove duplicate section. * Add symbols file. * Add Vcs link to salsa. Note: Tested on ratt and only "broctl" failed which fails due to python2 and not because of this change. -- Regards Sudip
Re: Moving salsa repo to debian group
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 04:25:19PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:51:38AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:13:14AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:33:19PM +0200, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote: > > > > Could someone move the following repository to the debian group? > > > > > > The original is still there. > > > > If you want a real move, you'll have to ask the salsa admins to do that > > since it requires owner permissions in the source namespace and > > maintainer permissions in the target namespace. Or first move it to a > > place where are DD has owner permissions and then said DD can move it > > again to /debian/. > > With no complex permissions, issue tracking, etc, on the old repo, I doubt > there's a benefit over create+push+delete, which doesn't require bothering > the admins. > > But, in case there'll be a repo that _has_ such metadata attached, it's good > to remember your advice. Thanks. Thats often wrong, because what you get is a working redirect, so that existing clones still work. Alex
