Re: Upload for Debian QA

2023-11-06 Thread Preuße , Hilmar

On 07.11.2023 01:07, Santiago Vila wrote:

Hi,


Hi. I see that the previous change was also requested by you (and
uploaded by someone else) due to its interaction with Texinfo.

If you feel attachment to an orphaned package, you can also adopt it.



I'm aware of that, but currently I'm not interested in maintaining more 
packages. Thanks for the offer. I was just interested in getting TeXInfo 
into testing.


H.
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Upload for Debian QA

2023-11-06 Thread Preuße , Hilmar

On 07.11.2023 00:25, Santiago Vila wrote:

El 6/11/23 a las 23:42, Hilmar Preuße escribió:


Hi,

TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of 
autoproject returns with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and 
created a patch for the issue. The package is maintained by the Debian 
QA group. What else can be done from my side?


Packages maintained by "QA Group" are like packages maintained by a
team, except that the team is Debian as a whole.

You could make the upload yourself (just say "QA upload" at the
beginning).

Please be aware, that I'm not a DD and currently I don't intend to 
change that. So I guess I can't upload, unless I got upload permits.


H.
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1055430: marked as done (RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy package)

2023-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 7 Nov 2023 07:09:04 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#1053575: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-1 -- Markdown lint tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055430,
regarding RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy 
package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1055430: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl":

 * Package name : ruby-mdl
   Version  : 0.13.0-2
   Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"]
 * URL  : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint
 * License  : MIT
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/nbehrnd/ruby-mdl
   Section  : text

The source builds the following binary packages:

  markdownlint - Markdown lint tool
  ruby-mdl - Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy package

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-mdl/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x
  https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-mdl/ruby-mdl_0.13.0-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 ruby-mdl (0.13.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Source only upload for migration to testing

Regards,
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:11:04AM +0100 schrieb Norwid Behrnd:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 16:54:22 +0100
> Tobias Frost  wrote:
> 
> > I've found something else:
> > the manpage is called markdownlint.1, there should probably a symlink
> > to mdl.1 
> > 
> > However, that is a minor thing and can be fixed in an subsequent upload.
> > 
> > --> Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian.  
> > 
> > (It now has to clear NEW, some patience might be required.)
> 
> Thank you for the upload of 0.13.0-1 which allowed to file promptly the next
> RFS for the the source-only upload of 0.13.0-2 the successful passing NEW now
> requires; a step I already anticipated (perhaps indicative of becoming more
> familiar with maintaining a package).

very good ;-) 

I've uploaded it just a few minutes before ;-)

Regarding the VCS-git: Please tag the releases on salsa; gbp build-package 
--git-tag-only
is a convenient way to do so ;-) (please add tags for 0.13.0-1 and 0.13.0-2)

Many thanks for your contribution!

-- 
Cheers,
tobi --- End Message ---


Bug#1055482: RFS: python-qmix/1.0.6-2 -- Quantum Mixing software

2023-11-06 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: kd8...@gmail.com

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qmix":

 * Package name : python-qmix
   Version  : 1.0.6-2
   Upstream contact : John Garrett 
 * URL  : https://github.com/garrettj403/QMix
 * License  : GPL-3
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/yogu/python-qmix
   Section  : python

The source builds the following binary packages:

  python3-qmix - Quantum Mixing software

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-qmix/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-qmix/python-qmix_1.0.6-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 python-qmix (1.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Source only upload for migration to testing. (Closes: #1055481)

Regards,
-- 
  Yogeswaran Umasankar



Re: Looking to find a sponsor

2023-11-06 Thread Soren Stoutner
Jordan,

Welcome to Debian packaging!

There are a set of instructions that will be helpful as you work on your first 
package:

https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers/[1]

Even though you are packaging a Python app, there are still a number of 
additional things 
needed to turn it into a proper Debian package.  For example, you need a 
debian/copyright 
file, a debian/control file, and a debian/rules file among other things.

One of the packages I maintain is Electrum, which is also a Python app.  You 
can get some 
sense of how to do it by looking at my packaging repository on Salsa (Debian’s 
GitLab 
server):

https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/tree/master/debian[2]

You might also want to subscribe to the Debian Python mailing list:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/[3]

Soren

On Monday, November 6, 2023 5:58:57 PM MST Jordan Rahim wrote:
> Hello Debian Mentors. I would like to apologize in advance if this is
> not the correct protocol. I am trying to follow the instructions as best
> as I can.
> 
> 
> I was wondering if there was anyone willing to sponsor my first debian
> package on to the apt repositories.
> 
> 
> Package Info
> 
> 
> The package is a Python app called CraftServerSetup that allows the user
> to  create and manage game servers for the popular video game Minecraft.
> As a result of the app's choice in programming language, it does not
> need any building or compiling at all (so I have it as a binary deb file
> right from the start).
> 
> On the "New Packager's Guide" page I saw something about requesting
> sponsors with a certain skillset..?
> 
> For that, I don't care very much. Just someone who is willing to upload
> the deb files to apt.
> 
> 
> Once again, I am very sorry if this is not what I am supposed to do.
> 
> 
> Thank you


-- 
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Looking to find a sponsor

2023-11-06 Thread Jordan Rahim
Hello Debian Mentors. I would like to apologize in advance if this is 
not the correct protocol. I am trying to follow the instructions as best 
as I can.



I was wondering if there was anyone willing to sponsor my first debian 
package on to the apt repositories.



Package Info


The package is a Python app called CraftServerSetup that allows the user 
to  create and manage game servers for the popular video game Minecraft. 
As a result of the app's choice in programming language, it does not 
need any building or compiling at all (so I have it as a binary deb file 
right from the start).


On the "New Packager's Guide" page I saw something about requesting 
sponsors with a certain skillset..?


For that, I don't care very much. Just someone who is willing to upload 
the deb files to apt.



Once again, I am very sorry if this is not what I am supposed to do.


Thank you



Re: Help fixing a gettext translation test

2023-11-06 Thread Santiago Vila

Hi.

A similar bug which was fixed in a similar way:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052859#40

See what Aurelien Jarno (glibc maintainer) said:

I have seen that in the meantime you have done a new upload with the
en_US.UTF-8 locale, that's a perfectly valid workaround.


Thanks.



Re: Upload for Debian QA

2023-11-06 Thread Santiago Vila

Hi. I see that the previous change was also requested by you
(and uploaded by someone else) due to its interaction with Texinfo.

If you feel attachment to an orphaned package, you can also adopt it.

Thanks.



Re: Upload for Debian QA

2023-11-06 Thread Santiago Vila

El 6/11/23 a las 23:42, Hilmar Preuße escribió:

TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of autoproject returns 
with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and created a patch for the issue. 
The package is maintained by the Debian QA group. What else can be done from my 
side?


Packages maintained by "QA Group" are like packages maintained by a team,
except that the team is Debian as a whole.

You could make the upload yourself (just say "QA upload" at the beginning).

For your convenience, I'm going to put your changes in git and do
the upload myself without further ado, just note that you don't have
to ask for permission to make an upload for a QA Group maintained package.

Thanks.



Upload for Debian QA

2023-11-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße

Hi all,

TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of 
autoproject returns with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and 
created a patch for the issue. The package is maintained by the Debian 
QA group. What else can be done from my side?


Hilmar
--
Testmail



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1055448: RFS: libsilkit/4.0.37-1 [ITP] -- Simulation in the loop kit by Vector

2023-11-06 Thread Krämer
Package: sponsorship-requests 
Severity: wishlist 

Dear mentors, 
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsilkit": 

 * Package name   : libsilkit 
    Version    : 4.0.37-1 
    Upstream contact : jan.krae...@vector.com 
 * URL  : https://github.com/vectorgrp/sil-kit 
 * License   : MIT 
 * Vcs  : https://github.com/vectorgrp/sil-kit
   Section    : libs 

The source builds the following binary packages: 

  libsilkit-dev - Development packages for libsilkit 
  libsilkit4 - Simulation in the loop kit by Vector 

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL: 

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsilkit/ 

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: 

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsilkit/libsilkit_4.0.37-1.dsc
 

Changes for the initial release: 
 libsilkit (4.0.37-1) unstable; urgency=medium 
 . 
   * Reworked the documentation on Virtual Time Synchronization 
   * The documentation of the demo section now refers to the pre built Vector 
 SIL Kit packages and not to a source build. 

An ITP bug for the wnpp package can be found here:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055064


Regards,
Jan Kraemer