Bug#965968: closing 965968

2020-07-23 Thread gustavo panizzo
close 965968 
thanks


I've just uploaded the package, built from source using the repo in salsa

cheers


-- 
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333



Bug#965968: RFS: ipcalc-ng/0.4.1-2 -- parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

2020-07-23 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hello

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:08:46PM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote:

Hi

Em 22/07/2020 18:38, gustavo panizzo escreveu:

Hi

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:34:41PM +0200, gustavo panizzo wrote:

Hi




thanks for this package :)

I'm willing to sponsor this upload, but please add the wording change in
d/control to the changelog.



also please add that the wording on the patch
030_disable-few-tests.patch was changed

A suggestion (you don't need to do it) in the test `debian/tests/json` parse 
the output with jq or json_pp or
$other_tool to validate that the output is valid json

cheers!


Thanks for the help. :)
It's all done as you suggested, including the json validate.
But I had a problem uploading the package to mentors, the orig file is not 
"downloadable", the apache is
returning forbidden status.
Anyway, if you prefer, the salsa repo is updated: 
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ipcalc-ng
I'll try to find a way to fix the situation on mentors.



I found this 3 lintian warnings

W: ipcalc-ng source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2 (line 9)
W: ipcalc-ng source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+ (line 
18)
I: ipcalc-ng source: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2 or gpl-2+ 
(line 36)

While GPL-2 and GPL-2+ license texts are similar, they are not the same.
You should add them both to the d/copyright file


the difference is this line
```
either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
```


Regards.


--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ D03D 4FB3 B4D3 7EF6 3B2E
⠈⠳⣄  GPG:rsa4096/7EF63B2E


--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333



Bug#965968: RFS: ipcalc-ng/0.4.1-2 -- parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

2020-07-22 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hi

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 01:52:04PM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote:

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipcalc-ng":

* Package name: ipcalc-ng
  Version : 0.4.1-2
  Upstream Author : https://gitlab.com/ipcalc/ipcalc/-/issues/new
* URL : https://gitlab.com/ipcalc/ipcalc
* License : GPL-3+, BSD-3-Clause, GPL-2, GPL-2+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ipcalc-ng
  Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

 ipcalc-ng - parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

 https://mentors.debian.net/package/ipcalc-ng/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipcalc-ng/ipcalc-ng_0.4.1-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

ipcalc-ng (0.4.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
  * Upload to unstable.


thanks for this package :)

I'm willing to sponsor this upload, but please add the wording change in
d/control to the changelog.


--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333



Bug#965968: RFS: ipcalc-ng/0.4.1-2 -- parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

2020-07-22 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hi

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:34:41PM +0200, gustavo panizzo wrote:

Hi




thanks for this package :)

I'm willing to sponsor this upload, but please add the wording change in
d/control to the changelog.



also please add that the wording on the patch
030_disable-few-tests.patch was changed

A suggestion (you don't need to do it) 
in the test `debian/tests/json` parse the output with jq or json_pp or

$other_tool to validate that the output is valid json

cheers!

--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333



Taking over a package from an active DD

2018-01-11 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hello

There is a package of my interest maintained by an active (with other
packages) DD, that person is also the upstream maintainer of the
package. I NMU'ed the package in the past and it was recently removed
from testing.

I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package
and offering to take over the maintenance. To date I have no answer.

What can I do?

thanks!

PS: emails where sent in oct and nov 2017
--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

2017-11-29 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hello

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 02:00:00AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:

Dear mentors list,

I maintain a proxy application, shadowsocks-libev.
I want to let it pass debian ci test. And I already confirm the test
all passed on my local environment, and debomatic [0].
However it failed on debian ci infrastructure [1].

[0] 
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/shadowsocks-libev/3.1.1+ds-1/autopkgtest
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/shadowsocks-libev/unstable/amd64/

For local test, it just need the commands below:

$ sudo apt install shadowsocks-libev curl dnsutils
$ git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/shadowsocks-libev.git
$ cd shadowsocks-libev
$ ./tests/test.sh

The last test.sh script invokes the test, which creates local proxy
listen to 127.0.0.1:1081, and then it calls curl command to get index
page of google via local proxy, 127.0.0.1:1081.

My local test shows all pass, while debian ci test [1] shows a
connection timeout message.
So I'm wondering whether debian ci support network activity, and how
can I configure the test to get it passed.


I'd suggest to install apache as part of the tests and connect to
localhost:80, that way it always works even if ci.debian.net moves to
China or google goes down

to test python-openstackclient; MySQL, RabbitMQ, Apache and others are
installed, I haven't check its tests in a while but happy to help you



Thank you!
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1



--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-07-23 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hello

I did review the package, here are my comments

- i did compare usbguard-0.7.0 tag from upstream github with
 upstream/0.7.0+ds1 from your repo

- Why did you remove NOTES.md, doc/usbguard-vs-udev.md,  and ROADMAP.md?, they 
look useful.

- in your git repo there should be a tags with the debian releases, i only
 see upstream/XXX tags. please push, and sign, tags to your repo.

- why m4/* files haven't been updated since release 0.5, upstream no
 longer ship those files. Why keep shipping it? i can build
 successfully against stretch, with or without them.

- why src/GUI.qt/ is deleted?

- i'm glad you deleted the 3rd party code :)

- please import upstream tags on your git repo, that makes more easy for
 others to review (and hopefully send patches)

I was going to upload but the perl breakage make build the package
impossible giving us a few more days to finish above'

Best

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:38:58PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:

Hi,

On 07/16/2017 05:28 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote:

[...]
but i've removed those files from the archive for now, patched the
relevant testscripts and created a bug report to create the testdata
from source [0]

cool, excelent
please add a target gen-orig-xz (or gz, or bz2) to d/rules to generate
the source from upstream source.

done in git


d/control

- You have a d/gbp.conf but not Vcs-* headers on d/control
 would be cool if you publish your git packaging, and documented it on
 d/control

fixed


please push tags to you repo so i can compare between your tags and
upstream tags

done


the package fails to build with sbuild

it works here *if* i stop the usbguard-daemon on the system i'm building
the package. one of the tests tries to start a usbguard daemon which
fails if there is already a daemon running


please do the d/rules targe and/or the tag in the repo so i have a way
to validate the source you are providing before upload. i don't see
anything else
missing in the package :)


cheers,
muri






--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-07-16 Thread gustavo panizzo

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:52:12PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:

On 06/29/2017 05:35 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote:

Hello, apologies for the late response


no worries, as you can see i'm not very fast myself

oke, so...

On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:

d/copyright

- please set the years to include 2016, 2017. there are some files owned
by RH which are copyright 2016 but in d/copyright it only says 2015

fixed


- src/Tests/Makefile.in, src/Tests/test-driver are copyright FSF

added in d/copyright


- would be cool to run files-without-copyright.sh

you mean in d/rules?





- src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz
 what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time

i'm not sure how to deal with this- the 0001.bin is a copy of a binary
USB Descriptor of one of upstreams devices.

which device? is it a physical device? is it a virtual device?


upstream says:

This is a copy of a binary USB descriptor of one of my devices. I

don't think I know anymore which one

but i've removed those files from the archive for now, patched the
relevant testscripts and created a bug report to create the testdata
from source [0]

cool, excelent
please add a target gen-orig-xz (or gz, or bz2) to d/rules to generate
the source from upstream source. 




- please clarify copyright for src/Tests/custom.supp

done so in [1] and upstream added a public domain header [2]. i've added
a paragraph about that file to d/copyright, although it does not yet
contain that public domain header in this release (the file containing
the public domain header is not part of a relaese)


d/control

- You have a d/gbp.conf but not Vcs-* headers on d/control
 would be cool if you publish your git packaging, and documented it on
 d/control

fixed


please push tags to you repo so i can compare between your tags and
upstream tags




 if you do that, please use pristine-tar to publish the tarballs

oke, i've imported the tarballs using pristine-tar commit
../usbguard_0.7.0+ds1.orig.tar.gz and used --git-pristine-tar with gbp


d/changelog

- please fix spelling in 'neede kernek'

fixed


* New upstream version 0.7.0
 This release contains a backwards incompatible
 change because it changes how the device hash is
 computed for Linux root hub devices

Please create a NEWS.Debian file, also please make a note to add a
notice in the release manual for buster (i know, looong time)
Users hate when things change without notice (i'm an usbguard user :)

i've added a d/NEWS file (dch --create --news) and added the information
there. did you mean i should make a note for myself or did you mean a
note in d/NEWS and if the latter, what is the syntax?

I meant the latter (so users can read it and fix their configs)

the package fails to build with sbuild


please do the d/rules targe and/or the tag in the repo so i have a way
to validate the source you are providing before upload. i don't see anything 
else
missing in the package :)



new version is on mentors ;)

cheers,
muri

[0] https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard/issues/188
[1] https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard/issues/175
[2]
https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard/commit/faa84a648a575db7d8e382729ea7dcea079afe3a






--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-29 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hello, apologies for the late response

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:49:51PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:

Hi,

On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:

- src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz
 what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time


i'm not sure how to deal with this- the 0001.bin is a copy of a binary
USB Descriptor of one of upstreams devices. 

which device? is it a physical device? is it a virtual device?


The root.tar.xz is an
archive containing the files from
src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/{bus,devices}, which itself is a copy of
upstreams /sys/bus/usb and /sys/devices, containing also some binary
files. And the files are only there for the tests.

looks to me like a bunch of mkdir, touch, etc can replace it easily



i would compare this with a JPG-file thats part of a graphics library
test-routine or something like that...

we try to generate those at build time

PS: i forgot to add to the last email we should target unstable instead
of experimental :)



cheers,
muri






--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-18 Thread gustavo panizzo


On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard"



d/copyright

- please set the years to include 2016, 2017. there are some files owned
by RH which are copyright 2016 but in d/copyright it only says 2015

- src/Tests/Makefile.in, src/Tests/test-driver are copyright FSF
- would be cool to run files-without-copyright.sh
- src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz 
 what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time
 
- please clarify copyright for src/Tests/custom.supp


d/control

- You have a d/gbp.conf but not Vcs-* headers on d/control
 would be cool if you publish your git packaging, and documented it on
 d/control
 
 if you do that, please use pristine-tar to publish the tarballs


d/changelog

- please fix spelling in 'neede kernek'

* New upstream version 0.7.0
 This release contains a backwards incompatible
 change because it changes how the device hash is
 computed for Linux root hub devices

Please create a NEWS.Debian file, also please make a note to add a
notice in the release manual for buster (i know, looong time)
Users hate when things change without notice (i'm an usbguard user :) 




--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-14 Thread gustavo panizzo
Hi

I'll review the package this weekend

On June 14, 2017 6:51:06 PM GMT+08:00, Muri Nicanor <m...@immerda.ch> wrote:
>control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
>hi,
>
>On 06/01/2017 12:07 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
>> the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to
>> build using sbuild.
>> 
>> FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1)
>this fails if there is already a running usbguard instance- when i
>stopped mine the test ran fine
>
>
>> perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?
>> 
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n dd bs=4096 count=1
>> if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/usbguard_disk
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line
>81:
>> sudo: command not found
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n modprobe dummy_hcd
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line
>82:
>> sudo: command not found
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n rmmod g_mass_storage
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line
>83:
>> sudo: command not found
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n modprobe g_mass_storage
>> file=/tmp/usbguard_disk iSerialNumber=555666111
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line
>84:
>> sudo: command not found
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + '[' 127 -ne 0 ']'
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + exit 77
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh
>(exit
>> status: 77)
>
>this test is now disabled (skipped), as the neede kernel modules needed
>are not part of debian default kernel
>
>> this should be easy to fix
>> 
>> Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  Skipping test because some dependecies
>> are missing
>> Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  ASPELL: Packaging/spell-check.sh.log: 
>> PANDOC: /usr/bin/pandoc
>> Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  SKIP Packaging/spell-check.sh (exit
>> status: 77)
>fixed.
>
>i've uploaded a new version to mentors,
>
>cheers,
>muri

-- 
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333

Sent from my mobile. Please excuse my brevity and typos.



Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-01 Thread gustavo panizzo


On June 1, 2017 6:13:06 PM GMT+08:00, Andrey Rahmatullin  
wrote:

>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh
>(exit status: 77)
>No, it's a bad idea to do things requiring root during tests,
>especially
>modprobe/rmmod

Maybe those tests can be run using autopkgtests

I'd prefer to run tests if they are available


>And please remember that just calling sudo is not enough to get root.

Of course, sudo's configuration was explicit in my mind, my bad I didn't 
mentioned it.

-- 
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333

Sent from my mobile. Please excuse my brevity and typos.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-01 Thread gustavo panizzo

control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo

the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to
build using sbuild.

FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1)

some tests are skipped, i feel they should run


perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?

UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n dd bs=4096 count=1 if=/dev/zero 
of=/tmp/usbguard_disk
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 81: sudo: 
command not found
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n modprobe dummy_hcd
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 82: sudo: 
command not found
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n rmmod g_mass_storage
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 83: sudo: 
command not found
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n modprobe g_mass_storage 
file=/tmp/usbguard_disk iSerialNumber=555666111
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 84: sudo: 
command not found
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + '[' 127 -ne 0 ']'
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + exit 77
UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh (exit status: 
77)


this should be easy to fix

Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  Skipping test because some dependecies are 
missing
Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  ASPELL: 
Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  PANDOC: /usr/bin/pandoc

Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  SKIP Packaging/spell-check.sh (exit status: 77)

thanks!

--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-01 Thread gustavo panizzo

Hello

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:


 * New upstream version 0.7.0
   This release contains a backwards incompatible
   change because it changes how the device hash is
   computed for Linux root hub devices


How is it handled for users that already have a config file? do they
need to create a new configuration file?
Can the update to the config file by done automatically? (postinst)

does this version need a newer kernel than older versions?

--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


tool to rebuild all build-deps of a package

2016-12-18 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Hello

Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive

Extra points for running the autopkgtests (if any)

thanks!

PS: pkg is python-pytest-timeout

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Re: Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

2016-12-03 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 09:06:36PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, I'm sponsoring in deferred/5 to let the current one migrate
> 
> 
> I'm also not really sure about the move from contrib to main, because one 
> (alternate)
> runtime dependency is in contrib
> 
> quoting control file:
> 
> Depends: libdbd-mysql-perl | libdbd-oracle-perl,
> 
> 
> $ rmadison -u debian libdbd-mysql-perl libdbd-oracle-perl -s unstable
> libdbd-mysql-perl  | 4.041-1   | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, 
> armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, 
> mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
> libdbd-oracle-perl | 1.74-3| unstable/contrib | source, amd64, i386
> 
> 
> so, maybe main is fine, but I'm still worried about an "ora2pg" being useful 
> for mysql, and not finding at runtime the oracle binding...

you're right, can you cancel that upload? 
I opened a bug in upstream's tracker to fix it

https://github.com/darold/ora2pg/issues/243


thanks

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

2016-12-03 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:05:50PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> can you please rebase on top of 8.11-2 version?
done, source can be found on 

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ora2pg/ora2pg_17.6-1.dsc
or
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ora2pg.git

> 
> thanks
thank you!

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

2016-12-01 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor for my QA upload to ora2pg

it closes an RC bug
I've improved the general shape of the package and moved the packaging
to collab-maint

The changelog follows

ora2pg (17.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * QA upload
  * Set the maintainer to Debian QA Group
  * New upstream release
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8
- Remove Dm-Upload-Allowed field from debian/control
  * Remove obsolete compression type 'bzip2' from debian/rules (Closes:
#833249)
  * Replace bzip2 by xz on debian/source/options
  * Refresh/Add patches
- refreshed 01_Ora2Pg.pod.diff
- refreshed 02_remove_unnecessary_files.diff
  change the manpage's destination from 3 to 3pm,
  not to modify ora2pg script at install time,
  and to install the config in /etc/ora2pg/ora2pg.conf
- add cf81287191c1560b238fe2967560d8bff33e24b0.patch, reverts 697f09d
  that was breaking encoding with input file (-i)
- Add spelling-fixes.patch
  * Update compat level to 10
  * Build depend on debhelper >=10
  * Moved out from contrib, as ora2pg supports both Oracle and MySQL
  * Change section from extra to database
  * Update long description to mention MySQL support
  * Update copyright years
  * Add Vcs-* fields to debian/control
  * Update README.source
  * Packaging is now maintained on a git repo under collab-maint
  * Add Vcs fields to debian/control
  * Add pristine-tar to the git repo
  * Add gbp.conf

 -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:13:21 +0800


the source can be found at 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ora2pg.git
and
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ora2pg/ora2pg_17.6-1.dsc

thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



when salvage a package?

2016-11-30 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Hello

I was tempted to do a QA upload for ora2pg [0], which is nice software because
helps people to move out from Oracle DB, but the popcon value is very low (< 
12) [1]
and the package has only one bug open, an automatic RC bug [2], that shows
that doesn't have many users out there.

The software is outdated, and the maintainer O the package. I wonder 
if salvaging the package is the right thing to do or should let it die
or even  RM after Stretch

TL;DR
I want to salvage a package but (maybe) nobody uses it, should I do salvage it 
anyway?


[0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ora2pg
[1] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ora2pg
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833249


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: can't upload to mentors

2016-11-24 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2016-11-24 11:21+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> > can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?
> > 
> > i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue 
> > (after removing 
> > .buildinfo  from .changes)
> 
> Sure!
> 
> - First I was told to remove the .buildinfo from the binary .changes and sign
>   it again, which did not work.
i did this 3 or 4 times last week

- delete all resulting files from previous builds but the orig.tar.gz,
  the result directory should only have the orig.tar.gz file before you
  start to build
- sbuid/pbuilder/gbp to create a binary+source package
- edit the .changes file to remove the .builinfo line
- sign the .changes, debsign mypackage_1.8beta5+ds1-2_amd64.changes
- upload to mentors, dput mentors mypackage_1.8beta5+ds1-2_amd64.changes 
  if you want to upload again you have to wait until the crojob delete the files
  before upload connect to ftp://mentors.debian.net and check your files
  are not there
- wait until the other cronjob accepts the package and sends you an
  email letting you know it worked :)
- profit! :) 

i *think* you signed the .changes, edited and signed again.

if you follow above's steps and keeps failing (remember to wait for
the cronjobs...) paste the output of every command here and i'll help
you.

but it shouldn't, as i said i did it like 3 times last week

> - Then I was told to do a source only upload, which did not work either.
> - Then I was told to go to #debian-mentors to find what was going on, which 
> did
>   work: there appeared to be a (still present and not identified) bug in
>   debexpo.
yeah, debexpo doesn't like .buildinfo files (maybe other bugs i'm not
aware)

good luck!

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Re: can't upload to mentors

2016-11-23 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:24:31AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> 
> >can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?
> >
> >i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue 
> >(after removing 
> >.buildinfo  from .changes)
> 
> 
> knowing that mentors discards binaries (and sponsors should do it anyway), 
> what is the
> reason for uploading them, other than wasting bandwidth? :)

to be honest, i don't have a good reason besides testing the resulting deb and 
that is 
my existing workflow

i do sbuild or pdebuilder or 
export GIT_PBUILDER_OPTIONS=--twice ; export ARCH=amd64 ;export DIST=sid; \
gbp buildpackage --git-builder=git-pbuilder -d --git-verbose

on top of a debian source tree and it always works, so why change? 

> 
> I think a source-only upload is more error-prone than a manual edit of 
> changes file,
> and source-only have lots of reasons to exist, so why don't use them? :p
i'm not sure i follow you here, but here goes my reasoning anyway 

ftp-master will request a binary upload, so why don't do the same for mentors 
since is
the very thing you're going to be doing later down the road.

i'd love if ftp-master accepted source only or even better 
discard the uploaded binaries, but is not the way it is today

i'm very tempted to do uploads to debian using !amd64 binaries to be sure that 
the binary used by (most of the) users hasn't been build by me but a buildd!


> 
> BTW congrats for your nm process end!
> 
> Gianfranco

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Re: can't upload to mentors

2016-11-23 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> At the end, it seems that there was an (unknown and not fixed) bug in debexpo.
> 
> The workflow that worked was:
> - do a source-only build of the package
can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?

i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue (after 
removing 
.buildinfo  from .changes)




-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Re: can't upload to mentors

2016-11-18 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:54:20PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> After all it does not seem that it has been uploaded...
> 
> I may have typed to fast "dput patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes" without
> mentioning mentors. Anyway, it seems like the package is uploaded ftp-master
> UploadQueue... Is it possible to verify if the package is there? Can I remove
> it from there and upload it to mentors, so that I can ask for a sponsor for
> this new version of the package?

the default upload target (to call it somehow) for dput is ftp-master

to avoid useless uploads to ftp-master you can overwrite the default
target with random stuff


$ cat ~/.dput.cf 
[DEFAULT]
fqdn = dev.null
incoming = /upload/c87718ea80a8bf3873f797e7adf794e1
default_host_main = dev.null



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Re: can't upldoad to mentors

2016-11-15 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Remove the buildinfo line from the changes file, sign, and upload again

On November 16, 2016 12:53:46 AM GMT+08:00, "Félix Sipma" 
 wrote:
>Hi!
>
>It seems like I can't upload to mentors anymore... Do you think there
>is a
>problem on my side?
>
>$ dput mentors ../build-area/patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes 
>Uploading patat using http to mentors (host: mentors.debian.net;
>directory: /upload)
>running checksum: verify checksums before uploading
>running gpg: check GnuPG signatures before the upload
>gpg: Signature made 2016-11-15T15:29:52 CET
>gpg:using RSA key
>611F861BAE64C6C14A26522FA710823E33BDDA81
>gpg: Good signature from "Félix Sipma "
>[ultimate]
>gpg: aka "Félix Sipma "
>[ultimate]
>gpg: aka "Félix Sipma "
>[ultimate]
>Primary key fingerprint: 2E6B 7C0E 128B 8F9B 16DA  A76A 5857 883E 277D
>B3CC
> Subkey fingerprint: 611F 861B AE64 C6C1 4A26  522F A710 823E 33BD DA81
>
>running suite-mismatch: check the target distribution for common errors
>running protected-distribution: warn before uploading to distributions
>where a special policy applies
>Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1.dsc
>Upload permissions error
>
>   You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on
>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the
>server.
>
>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete
>upload.
>No file was uploaded, however.
>Uploading patat_0.4.0.0.orig.tar.gz
>Upload permissions error
>
>   You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on
>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the
>server.
>
>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete
>upload.
>No file was uploaded, however.
>Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
>^[[AUpload permissions error
>
>   You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on
>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the
>server.
>
>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete
>upload.
>No file was uploaded, however.
>Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1_20161115T142950z-7b479c6b.buildinfo
>Upload permissions error
>
>   You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on
>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the
>server.
>
>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete
>upload.
>No file was uploaded, however.
>Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.deb
>Upload permissions error
>
>   You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on
>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the
>server.
>
>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete
>upload.
>No file was uploaded, however.
>Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes
>Upload permissions error
>
>   You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on
>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the
>server.
>
>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete
>upload.
>No file was uploaded, however.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: debexpo bug on upload

2016-11-12 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:20:46AM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote:
 
> Unfortunately, I spoke too soon.. the .buildinfo upload failed with 403
> Forbidden again :(
Remove the .buildinfo line from the .changes file, then sign and upload.

mentors.d.n does not accept .buildinfo files yet

> 
> Would you be able to remove that file too? :)

AFAIK, there is a cronjob that removes the incomplete uploads after some time


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Re: How long to wait between RFA and QA upload?

2016-11-03 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 06:38:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
...
> 
> Orphaned packages are up for grabs the moment the O is filed.

thanks to Adam, Paul, and Gianfranco for your responses, I'll start to
work on the QA upload asap

cheers!


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



How long to wait between RFA and QA upload?

2016-10-31 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Hello

Recently I NMU'ed tsocks, as the shape of the package wasn't good [1]
in the RFS email I said that I'd try to get the package orphaned so I can do a 
proper QA upload.

The maintainer orphaned the package 2 days ago, #842555.

I don't want to adopt the package, but I do use it so I want to see it
in good shape, how long should I wait for others that may adopt the
package before I do a QA upload?.

I was going to send a notice regarding my QA upload to the O bug but I
think it may discourage people from adopting the package.

The only guidance I found is 2 weeks,
https://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html


TL;DR

how long should I wait between an O bug and a QA upload?

thanks!

[1] we can further discuss this, but I don't think is necessary at this point

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#842318: RFS: tsocks/1.8beta5-9.5 [NMU] [RC]

2016-10-27 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important


Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor for my NMU to tsocks


it closes two RC bug that removed tsocks from testing

The debdiff is attached

Package is getting out of shape after 5 NMUs, I plan to request to be
orphaned and put it under maintenance of the QA team, so I can do a more
extensive cleanup.

thanks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 
'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/changelog tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/changelog
--- tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/changelog	2016-03-01 01:40:38.0 +0800
+++ tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/changelog	2016-10-28 10:33:56.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+tsocks (1.8beta5-9.5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Removal of deprecated dh_undocumented debhelper command (Closes: #815611).
+  * Enable host name resolution on /etc/tsocks.conf at configure time,
+it was intended to be enabled in previous releases, but a bug in the
+configure script disabled it (Closes: #823330).
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:33:56 +0800
+
 tsocks (1.8beta5-9.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/00list tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/00list
--- tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/00list	2011-10-02 14:37:03.0 +0800
+++ tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/00list	2016-10-28 10:33:56.0 +0800
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
 04_getpeername
 05_config_in_home
 06_fallback
+07_tsocks-1.8_beta5-hostname-config-fix.patch
diff -Nru tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/07_tsocks-1.8_beta5-hostname-config-fix.patch tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/07_tsocks-1.8_beta5-hostname-config-fix.patch
--- tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/07_tsocks-1.8_beta5-hostname-config-fix.patch	1970-01-01 08:00:00.0 +0800
+++ tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/patches/07_tsocks-1.8_beta5-hostname-config-fix.patch	2016-10-28 10:33:56.0 +0800
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## 07_tsocks-1.8_beta5-hostname-config-fix.patch by https://sourceforge.net/u/phobosk/profile/
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: Enable host name resolution on /etc/tsocks.conf at configure time,
+## DP: this was intended to be enabled in previous releases, but a bug in the configure script
+## DP: made it impossible
+## DP: Poor's man DEP3 headers
+## DP: Origin: https://sourceforge.net/p/tsocks/bugs/27/
+## DP: Last-Update: 2016-10-28
+
+@DPATCH@
+--- tsocks-1.8.orig/configure.in
 tsocks-1.8/configure.in
+@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@
+   AC_DEFINE(ALLOW_MSG_OUTPUT)
+ fi
+ 
+-if test "x${enable_hostnames}" = "x"; then
+-  AC_DEFINE(HOSTNAMES)
++if test "${enable_hostnames}" = "yes"; then
++  AC_DEFINE(HOSTNAMES,1)
+ fi
+ 
+ if test "${enable_socksdns}" = "yes" -a \
diff -Nru tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/rules tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/rules
--- tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/rules	2016-02-29 22:08:47.0 +0800
+++ tsocks-1.8beta5/debian/rules	2016-10-28 10:33:56.0 +0800
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
 	dh_testdir
 
 #	dpkg-gencontrol -isp
-	dh_undocumented
+#	dh_undocumented
 	dh_installdocs
 
 	#dh_installdebconf


Bug#841928: RFS: fprintd/0.6.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-10-25 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 06:46:51AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

> I would have sponsored in deferred/4, but deferred is not working :)
> there is no indication of a fix in progress, the bug is two months old
> and it was planned to become rc soon.
> The maintainer didn't answer, so even if the RC change is only about 4 days 
> ago,
> I sponsored it anyway.
> (because of lowNMU and the change was trivial)
> BTW, the package is Team Maintained, so lowNMU doesn't exactly work in this 
> case
> "except: Team-maintained packages"
I did read that, but

$ grep -- '--' debian/changelog
 -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:40:42 +0800
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Wed, 08 Jun 2016 21:32:01 +0200
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Wed, 06 May 2015 18:17:08 +0200
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Sun, 29 Sep 2013 15:37:35 +0200
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Sat, 18 May 2013 17:46:02 +0200
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:04:41 +0100
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Sun, 27 May 2012 18:28:38 +0200
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Mon, 14 May 2012 23:09:47 +0200
 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Mon, 14 May 2012 22:07:37 +0200

$ git log |grep debian.org |wc
 73 2922921
$ git log |grep o...@debian.org | wc
 72 2882880
$ git log |grep Author| wc
2691072   11334

> 
> Didier, do you mind applying the debdiff on VCS?
g, no perms

I copied my repo to
git.debian.org:/srv/home/users/gfa-guest/public_git/fprintd
(I've requested to join the alioth team)

thanks for the upload and fprintd!

> 
> thanks you both!
> 
> G.

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Bug#841928: RFS: fprintd/0.6.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-10-24 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor for my NMU to fprintd
it closes an RC bug (removal on 2016-11-05)

I've checked the LowThresholdNmu, the most active maintainer  is on it,
there is no mention of the team in the list.
I informed the maintainer about the NMU on the bug

The debdiff is attached

thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru fprintd-0.6.0/debian/changelog fprintd-0.6.0/debian/changelog
--- fprintd-0.6.0/debian/changelog	2016-06-09 03:32:03.0 +0800
+++ fprintd-0.6.0/debian/changelog	2016-10-24 20:40:42.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+fprintd (0.6.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add intltool to build-dep, preparing for the deprecation of gnome-common,
+Fixes FTBFS. (Closes: #837823).
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:40:42 +0800
+
 fprintd (0.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Santiago Vila ]
diff -Nru fprintd-0.6.0/debian/control fprintd-0.6.0/debian/control
--- fprintd-0.6.0/debian/control	2016-06-09 03:31:31.0 +0800
+++ fprintd-0.6.0/debian/control	2016-10-24 20:33:56.0 +0800
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  libdbus-glib-1-dev,
  libpolkit-gobject-1-dev,
  gtk-doc-tools,
+ intltool,
  libpam0g-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.9.8
 Homepage: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/fprint/fprintd


Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

2016-10-19 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:43:31PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2016, 14:15 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > 
> > > Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload.
> > > The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent upload, but maybe you can
> > > include
> > > it already in the revised packages.
> > 
> > 
> > I've pushed to alioth, please take a look
> > 
> 
> Please recheck, I can't see the changes here.

sorry about that. Can you try again?

thanks!

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

2016-10-19 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> 
> Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload.
> The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent upload, but maybe you can include
> it already in the revised packages.

I've pushed to alioth, please take a look


(archive-gfa@nm.d.o is bcc'ed)


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#840500: RFS: asciinema/1.3.0-2 [RC]

2016-10-12 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important


Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor of my updated asciinema package

If closes an RC bug, and various fixes/improvements

Here is the last entry in the changelog

asciinema (1.3.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Correct the license from MIT to GPL-3+ (Closes: #840134).
  * Relicense the debian directory to GPL-3+
  * Use upstream manpage
  * Run the test suite, as it does not get run by default
  * Store the generated tarball using pristine-tar

 -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:07 +0800

git repo can be found at
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/asciinema.git

built package can be downloaded from
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.3.0-2.dsc

attached the debdiff between 1.3.0-1 and 1.3.0-2


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru asciinema-1.3.0/debian/asciinema.manpages asciinema-1.3.0/debian/asciinema.manpages
--- asciinema-1.3.0/debian/asciinema.manpages	2016-07-29 17:06:45.0 +0800
+++ asciinema-1.3.0/debian/asciinema.manpages	2016-10-11 09:23:16.0 +0800
@@ -1 +1 @@
-debian/asciinema.1
+man/asciinema.1
diff -Nru asciinema-1.3.0/debian/changelog asciinema-1.3.0/debian/changelog
--- asciinema-1.3.0/debian/changelog	2016-07-29 18:37:47.0 +0800
+++ asciinema-1.3.0/debian/changelog	2016-10-11 09:28:07.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+asciinema (1.3.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Correct the license from MIT to GPL-3+ (Closes: #840134).
+  * Relicense the debian directory to GPL-3+
+  * Use upstream manpage
+  * Run the test suite, as it does not get run by default
+  * Store the generated tarball using pristine-tar
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:07 +0800
+
 asciinema (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release
diff -Nru asciinema-1.3.0/debian/control asciinema-1.3.0/debian/control
--- asciinema-1.3.0/debian/control	2016-07-29 23:20:15.0 +0800
+++ asciinema-1.3.0/debian/control	2016-10-11 09:28:07.0 +0800
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), python3-setuptools, dh-python, python3-all
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), python3-setuptools, dh-python, python3-all, python3-nose
 Standards-Version: 3.9.8
 Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/asciinema.git
 Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/asciinema.git
diff -Nru asciinema-1.3.0/debian/copyright asciinema-1.3.0/debian/copyright
--- asciinema-1.3.0/debian/copyright	2016-07-29 18:11:46.0 +0800
+++ asciinema-1.3.0/debian/copyright	2016-10-11 09:28:07.0 +0800
@@ -3,29 +3,27 @@
 Source: http://asciinema.org
 
 Files: *
-Copyright: (c) 2013-2016, Marcin Kulik
-License: MIT
+Copyright: 2013-2016, Marcin Kulik
+License: GPL-3+
 
 Files: debian/*
-Copyright: (c) 2014-2016, gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>
-License: MIT
+Copyright: 2014-2016, gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>
+License: GPL-3+
 
-License: MIT
- Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
- a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
- "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
- without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
- distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
- permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
- the following conditions:
+License: GPL-3+
+  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
  .
- The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
- included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
  .
- THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
- EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
- MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
- NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE
- LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION
- OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
- WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN TH

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

2016-10-10 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:57:30AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:

> Could you please add option to run it in foreground? Runit init
> system, which I package exect services to be foreground processes.

uptimed -f makes uptimed to run in foreground

--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

2016-10-04 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor of my package uptimed,
I want to adopt this package after it was orphaned by the previous
maintainer #830765

uptimed is an old package (in debian since '99) it has many bugs open,
I fixed some bugs but others I wasn't able to reproduce them,
so my plan is to upload to experimental
and contact the reporters to see if they/I can reproduce the bugs then fix
them.

I want to upload to experimental to check if it builds reproducibly in all 
Debian architectures.
Be aware that I'll request another upload latter for unstable.

debian/rules and packaging in general was polished, modernized, and uploaded
to collab-maint

this is the changelog

uptimed (1:0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1) experimental; urgency=medium

  * New maintainer, thanks Thibaut Varene for your previous
work (Closes: #830765)
  * Packaging is now maintained in collab-maint using a git repo
  * Packaging an snapshot from upstream
  * Packaging using git tags instead of tarballs
  * Change dh compat to level 9. No changes were needed
  * Build depend on debhelper 9 and dh-autoreconf
  * Update Homepage field on debian/control (Closes: #806456)
  * Handle missing /etc/uptimed.conf (Closes: #680419)
  * Simplify uptimed init.d script, restart unconditionally on uptimed
postinst
  * Match the location of the $PIDFILE in the init script and the daemon
configuration (Closes: #336922) (LP: #482629)
  * Create /run/uptimed via a tmpfile on systemd systems
  * Change the default interval to save the database from 300 to 3600 seconds
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8. No changes were needed
  * Override 2 lintian warnings (unused-debconf-template)
  * Remove perl dependency on libuptimed0 and libuptimed-dev, perl-base is
enough
  * Change watch file to look at github
  * Update uptimed's service file, to start after the time is in sync,
it still may fail if systemd-timesyncd.service is not in use
  * Update uptimed's service to provide uptimed's documentation
  * More modern debian/rules
  * Print a warning on debconf when reducing MAX_RECORDS (Closes: #573232)
  * Add pristine-tar to git repo

 -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:58:19 +0800


git repo can be found here

git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/uptimed.git

built package can be found on mentors
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uptimed/uptimed_0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1.dsc


thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#838617: RFS: python-socketpool_0.5.3-3 [RC] -- upload or nmu

2016-09-22 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor of my updated python-socketpool package.

The update fixes a FTBFS that would make the package to be autoremoved,
python-socketpool is one of the dependencies of couchapp, which I
maintain.

I'm CC ing in this bug report both the uploader and the
maintainer team of the package.

I've attached 3 diff files to this bug report

- python-socketpool-0.5.3-3.1-nmu.diff

  diff since last upload to debian, this diff would produce an NMU.
  I don't think it will apply cleanly on top of the git repo on its current
  status. It does includes changes made by Ondřej Nový

  Changelog

  python-socketpool (0.5.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=low

[ gustavo panizzo ]
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Patch setup.py to use codecs module to read unicode, Fixes FTBFS
  (Closes: #835682) (Closes: #834920).
* Fix a typo on python3-socketpool long description

[ Ondřej Nový ]
* Fixed homepage (https)
* Fixed VCS URL (https)



- python-socketpool-0.5.3-3.1-diff-git.diff

  diff against the git repo on its current status (f108336)
  this builds on top of Ondřej Nový's changes. It would produce an NMU.
  it contains the same changes as the previous patch

- python-socketpool_0.5.3-3.diff

  diff against the git repo on its current status (f108336)
  this builds on top of Ondřej Nový's changes. It would produce an
  standard upload.
  it contains the same changes as the previous patch and other fixes.

  Changelog

  python-socketpool (0.5.3-3) unstable; urgency=low

[ gustavo panizzo ]
* Patch setup.py to use codecs module to read unicode, Fixes FTBFS
  (Closes: #835682) (Closes: #834920).
* Fix a typo on python3-socketpool long description
* Increase the delhelper compat level to 9.
* Add dh-python to build deps.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8. No changes were needed.

[ Ondřej Nový ]
* Fixed homepage (https)
* Fixed VCS URL (https)


I prefer if this gets uploaded. this build can be downloaded from -mentors or 
this git repo

git.debian.org:/srv/home/users/gfa-guest/public_git/python-socketpool

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-socketpool/python-socketpool_0.5.3-3.dsc

thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/changelog python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/changelog
--- python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/changelog	2015-11-25 22:40:35.0 +0800
+++ python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/changelog	2016-09-20 18:41:35.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+python-socketpool (0.5.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ gustavo panizzo ]
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Patch setup.py to use codecs module to read unicode, Fixes FTBFS
+(Closes: #835682) (Closes: #834920).
+  * Fix a typo on python3-socketpool long description
+
+  [ Ondřej Nový ]
+  * Fixed homepage (https)
+  * Fixed VCS URL (https)
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:41:35 +0800
+
 python-socketpool (0.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ SVN-Git Migration ]
diff -Nru python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/control python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/control
--- python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/control	2015-11-25 22:40:35.0 +0800
+++ python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/control	2016-09-20 18:41:35.0 +0800
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
 	python-setuptools,
 	python3-setuptools
 Standards-Version: 3.9.6
-Homepage: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/socketpool
-Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/python-modules/packages/python-socketpool.git
+Homepage: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/socketpool
+Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-socketpool.git
 Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python-socketpool.git
 
 Package: python-socketpool
@@ -31,4 +31,4 @@
  Socket pool is a simple socket pool that supports multiple factories and
  backends. It can easily be used by gevent, eventlet or any other library.
  .
- This package for Python 2.
+ This package for Python 3.
diff -Nru python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/patches/fix-FTBFS.patch python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/patches/fix-FTBFS.patch
--- python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/patches/fix-FTBFS.patch	1970-01-01 08:00:00.0 +0800
+++ python-socketpool-0.5.3/debian/patches/fix-FTBFS.patch	2016-09-20 18:41:35.0 +0800
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Description: Fix a FTBFS
+ setup.py open() an unicode file as ascii, this patch modifies setup.py
+ to open the file as binary then decodes it from utf-8
+Origin: Upstream
+Author: Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com
+Last-Update: 2016-04-06
+
+--- a/setup.py
 b/setup.py
+@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ CLASSIFIERS = [
+ 
+ 
+ # read long descr

Bug#838217: RFS: license-reconcile/0.12+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-09-18 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on license-reconcile
It closes an FTBFS RC bug.

The debdiff is attached

The package can be downloaded from -mentors
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/license-reconcile/license-reconcile_0.12+nmu1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

license-reconcile (0.12+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low

  [ gustavo panizzo ]
  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Update test cases to match licensecheck output. Thanks Petter Reinholdtsen
for the patches, Fix FTBFS (Closes: #832840).

  [ gregor herrmann ]
  * Remove Nicholas Bamber from Uploaders. Thanks for your work!

 -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:40:39 +0800


Upstream had a change non yet published but it is non-functional, so I've 
included it as well.

The maintainer (gregoa) and the umbrella group (perl group)  are on 
https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu
The NMU fixes the tests as the output on the underlying tool has changed.

thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru license-reconcile-0.11/debian/changelog license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- license-reconcile-0.11/debian/changelog	2016-07-05 20:20:50.0 +0800
+++ license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/debian/changelog	2016-09-18 10:40:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+license-reconcile (0.12+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ gustavo panizzo ]
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Update test cases to match licensecheck output. Thanks Petter Reinholdtsen
+for the patches, Fix FTBFS (Closes: #832840).
+
+  [ gregor herrmann ]
+  * Remove Nicholas Bamber from Uploaders. Thanks for your work!
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:40:39 +0800
+
 license-reconcile (0.11) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * debian/copyright: change Copyright-Format 1.0 URL to HTTPS.
diff -Nru license-reconcile-0.11/debian/control license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/debian/control
--- license-reconcile-0.11/debian/control	2016-07-05 20:20:50.0 +0800
+++ license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/debian/control	2016-09-16 09:27:33.0 +0800
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Source: license-reconcile
 Maintainer: Debian Perl Group <pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
-Uploaders: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org>, Nicholas Bamber <nicho...@periapt.co.uk>
+Uploaders: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org>
 Section: devel
 Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl
 Priority: optional
diff -Nru license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/App.pm license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/App.pm
--- license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/App.pm	2016-07-05 20:20:50.0 +0800
+++ license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/App.pm	2016-09-18 10:23:37.0 +0800
@@ -244,11 +244,11 @@
 
 =head1 VERSION
 
-Version 0.11
+Version 0.12+nmu1
 
 =cut
 
-our $VERSION = '0.11';
+our $VERSION = '0.12+nmu1';
 
 
 =head1 SYNOPSIS
@@ -289,6 +289,8 @@
 
 =head2 files
 
+=head2 suggest_stanzas
+
 =head1 AUTHOR
 
 Nicholas Bamber, C<<  >>
diff -Nru license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum/Holder.pm license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum/Holder.pm
--- license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum/Holder.pm	2016-07-05 20:20:50.0 +0800
+++ license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum/Holder.pm	2016-09-17 20:18:04.0 +0800
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@
 
 =head1 VERSION
 
-Version 0.11
+Version 0.12+nmu1
 
 =cut
 
-our $VERSION = '0.11';
+our $VERSION = '0.12+nmu1';
 
 
 =head1 SYNOPSIS
diff -Nru license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum.pm license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum.pm
--- license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum.pm	2016-07-05 20:20:50.0 +0800
+++ license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightDatum.pm	2016-09-17 20:24:09.0 +0800
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@
 
 =head1 VERSION
 
-Version 0.11
+Version 0.12+nmu1
 
 =cut
 
-our $VERSION = '0.11';
+our $VERSION = '0.12+nmu1';
 
 =head1 DESCRIPTION
 
diff -Nru license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightTarget.pm license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightTarget.pm
--- license-reconcile-0.11/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightTarget.pm	2016-07-05 20:20:50.0 +0800
+++ license-reconcile-0.12+nmu1/lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/CopyrightTarget.pm	2016-09-17 20:18:48.0 +0800
@@ -100,11 +100,11 @@
 
 =head1 VERSION
 
-Version 0.11
+Version 0.12+nmu1
 
 =cut
 
-our $VERSION = '0.11';
+our $VERSION = '0.

Bug#837887: RFS: xautolock/2.2-5.1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-09-15 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important


I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on xautolock
It closes an RC bug, I've validated that the the fix
doesn't break my machines.

The debdiff is attached

The package can be downloaded from -mentors

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xautolock/xautolock_2.2-5.1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

xautolock (1:2.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * This update allows one to build against glibc >= 2.24.
  Thanks Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org> for the patch
  (Closes: #833971).

 -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:54:09 +0800


thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru xautolock-2.2/debian/changelog xautolock-2.2/debian/changelog
--- xautolock-2.2/debian/changelog	2016-09-15 14:54:09.0 +0800
+++ xautolock-2.2/debian/changelog	2016-03-16 06:17:05.0 +0800
@@ -1,12 +1,3 @@
-xautolock (1:2.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
-
-  * Non-maintainer upload.
-  * This update allows one to build against glibc >= 2.24.
-  Thanks Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org> for the patch
-  (Closes: #833971).
-
- -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:54:09 +0800
-
 xautolock (1:2.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upolad
diff -Nru xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/14-do-not-use-union-wait-type.patch xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/14-do-not-use-union-wait-type.patch
--- xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/14-do-not-use-union-wait-type.patch	2016-09-15 14:54:09.0 +0800
+++ xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/14-do-not-use-union-wait-type.patch	1970-01-01 08:00:00.0 +0800
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Description: Allows to build against glibc >=2.24
-Author: Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org>
-Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833971
-
 xautolock-2.2.orig/src/engine.c
-+++ xautolock-2.2/src/engine.c
-@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ evaluateTriggers (Display* d)
- #else /* VMS */
-   if (lockerPid)
-   {
--#if !defined (UTEKV) && !defined (SYSV) && !defined (SVR4)
-+#if !defined (UTEKV) && !defined (SYSV) && !defined (SVR4) && !defined (__GLIBC__)
- union wait  status;  /* childs process status */
- #else /* !UTEKV && !SYSV && !SVR4 */
- int status = 0;  /* childs process status */
-@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ evaluateTriggers (Display* d)
-   (void) kill (lockerPid, SIGTERM);
- }
- 
--#if !defined (UTEKV) && !defined (SYSV) && !defined (SVR4)
-+#if !defined (UTEKV) && !defined (SYSV) && !defined (SVR4) && !defined (__GLIBC__)
- if (wait3 (, WNOHANG, 0))
- #else /* !UTEKV && !SYSV && !SVR4 */
- if (waitpid (-1, , WNOHANG)) 
diff -Nru xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/series xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/series
--- xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/series	2016-09-15 14:54:09.0 +0800
+++ xautolock-2.2/debian/patches/series	2016-03-16 06:16:38.0 +0800
@@ -2,4 +2,3 @@
 11-fix-no-dpms.patch
 12-fix-manpage.patch
 13-fix-hppa-build.patch
-14-do-not-use-union-wait-type.patch


Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-13 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:00:55AM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> Please wait, I missed an update to debian/watch.

Now git repo is ready to be reviewed

--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-13 Thread gustavo panizzo
Please wait, I missed an update to debian/watch.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:55:40AM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:26:52AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > >ohhh, totally get it. thanks for spotting it
> > 
> > 
> > thanks for getting it ;)
> > 
> > is the only way i found to silence lintian about non-encrypted Vcs- urls
> > 
> > 
> > "https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git;
> > 
> > and 
> > 
> > "https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/couchapp.git;
> 
> both can be used on the browser or git clone, neither of them can be
> used to push :(
> 
> > 
> > simple as that :)
> > >i removed it as it was going to bit rot, i replaced it by README.source
> > >which sould make easier for others to follow.
> > 
> > "diferently." <-- typo
> 
> arrgghhh
> 
> > 
> > I still think Files-Excluded copyright feature is a better solution, but
> > feel free to use your best workflow :)
> > 
> > new review:
> > couchapp-1.0.2+dfsg1/debian/CHANGELOG
> > 
> > this file has been added in this upload...
> > mistake?
> its the upstream changelog, i generated it from git log
> 
> > 
> > 
> > still one license missing
> > ./couchapp/templates/vendor/couchapp/_attachments/md5.js
> > 
> > 
> > * A JavaScript implementation of the RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message
> > * Digest Algorithm, as defined in RFC 1321.
> > * Version 2.1 Copyright (C) Paul Johnston 1999 - 2002.
> > * Other contributors: Greg Holt, Andrew Kepert, Ydnar, Lostinet
> > * Distributed under the BSD License
> > * See http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5 for more info.
> > 
> ar, fixed. thanks
> 
> > 
> > we should be really good after this one :)
> > 
> > (sorry for being so pedantic!)
> 
> no worries, thanks for keeping pushing it
> 
> 
> --
> 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
> 
> keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa



Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-13 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:26:52AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi
> 
> >ohhh, totally get it. thanks for spotting it
> 
> 
> thanks for getting it ;)
> 
> is the only way i found to silence lintian about non-encrypted Vcs- urls
> 
> 
> "https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git;
> 
> and 
> 
> "https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/couchapp.git;

both can be used on the browser or git clone, neither of them can be
used to push :(

> 
> simple as that :)
> >i removed it as it was going to bit rot, i replaced it by README.source
> >which sould make easier for others to follow.
> 
> "diferently." <-- typo

arrgghhh

> 
> I still think Files-Excluded copyright feature is a better solution, but
> feel free to use your best workflow :)
> 
> new review:
> couchapp-1.0.2+dfsg1/debian/CHANGELOG
> 
> this file has been added in this upload...
> mistake?
its the upstream changelog, i generated it from git log

> 
> 
> still one license missing
> ./couchapp/templates/vendor/couchapp/_attachments/md5.js
> 
> 
> * A JavaScript implementation of the RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message
> * Digest Algorithm, as defined in RFC 1321.
> * Version 2.1 Copyright (C) Paul Johnston 1999 - 2002.
> * Other contributors: Greg Holt, Andrew Kepert, Ydnar, Lostinet
> * Distributed under the BSD License
> * See http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5 for more info.
> 
ar, fixed. thanks

> 
> we should be really good after this one :)
> 
> (sorry for being so pedantic!)

no worries, thanks for keeping pushing it


--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-08 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:35:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Gustavo
> 
> 
> >> INSTALL_REQUIRES = ['restkit==4.2.2', 'watchdog==0.6.0']
> 
> >> why is restkit manually listed in runtime dependencies?
> >
> >that's for setuptools, I could patch it out, but why?
> 
> 
> please read what I wrote :)
> python-restkit is a build-dependency, and listed in install_requires keyword.
> dh_python2 should pick it up automagically and translate it into
> a runtime-dependency in ${python:Depends}
> 
> please remove it, and check if the dependency is correctly added in the binary
> file (debian/control)
ohhh, totally get it. thanks for spotting it

> 
> >no, is not wrong
> >$ git clone
> >https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git
> >Cloning into 'couchapp'...
> 
> 
> yes, I know it works, but probably because of some rewrite rule in 
> collab-maint git
> apache configuration.
> I still prefer to have them separate, because it won't work on other non 
> alioth git repo.
> (and some bad copy-paste might introduce such issues)

is the only way i found to silence lintian about non-encrypted Vcs- urls

> 
> (this *isn't* a blocker for this upload, feel free to keep it that way)
> 
> >restkit doest not have a python3 package, nose-testconfig does not work on
> >python3 AFAIK, and it is necesary for tests
> >
> >the mention in README.md about python3 is to host the coverage
> >reports
> 
> 
> ack thanks
> 
> 
> >thanks, how did you find it? licensecheck didn't!
> 
> 
> some grep copyright . -Ri ; grep license . -Ri
> and debdiff between the two versions did spot it
> 
> (did you remove such file in debian/repack script?)
i removed it as it was going to bit rot, i replaced it by README.source
which sould make easier for others to follow.


thanks

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-05 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:23:58 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package couchapp
> 
> 
> some questions before sponsoring or giving you DM
> 
> 1)
> 
> INSTALL_REQUIRES = ['restkit==4.2.2', 'watchdog==0.6.0']
> 
> 
> why is restkit manually listed in runtime dependencies?

that's for setuptools, I could patch it out, but why?

> 
> 2) 
> Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git
> 
> 
> cgit is wrong for Vcs-Git :)

no, is not wrong
$ git clone
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git
Cloning into 'couchapp'...
remote: Counting objects: 7239, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2726/2726), done.
remote: Total 7239 (delta 4007), reused 7169 (delta 3955)
Receiving objects: 100% (7239/7239), 5.61 MiB | 942.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (4007/4007), done.
Checking connectivity... done.


> 
> 3) this release seems to be Python3 ready, did you consider checking
> if all the dependencies are Python3 ready and switching to it?
> (note: I didn't check)

restkit doest not have a python3 package, nose-testconfig does not work on
python3 AFAIK, and it is necesary for tests

the mention in README.md about python3 is to host the coverage
reports

> 
> 4)
> +# Sample script to install Python and pip under Windows
> +# Authors: Olivier Grisel, Jonathan Helmus and Kyle Kastner
> +# License: CC0 1.0 Universal: 
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
> 
> +::
> +:: Author: Olivier Grisel
> +:: License: CC0 1.0 Universal: 
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
> 
> 
> showstopper!

thanks, how did you find it? licensecheck didn't!

PS: I've added autopkgtest support to the package :)

--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-04 Thread gustavo panizzo
Gianfranco

I didn't forget about this, I'm in the middle of a peak of work, I'll
get it done in the next few days.

thanks!

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-02 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package couchapp

This package contains a new upstream release and other packaging changes

couchapp (1.0.2+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.
  * Removed non-free bytes.
  * Add python-watchdog to build-dependencies
  * Bump standards to version 3.9.8. No changes needed.
  * Move to web section. (Closes: #832199).
  * Move packaging to git, add Vcs-* entries to control file.
  * Update copyright file.
  * Create gbp.conf.
  * Use pristine-tar for packaging.
  * Acknowledged NMU. (Closes: 785992).


The git repo is at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git

Alternativelly, the package can be downloaded from mentors
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/couchapp/couchapp_1.0.2+dfsg1-1.dsc

I'm a DM, I'd happily accept DM permissions to upload it to the archive

thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#835559: RFS: python-jsmin/2.2.1-1

2016-08-29 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:17:47 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package python-jsmin
> 
> 
> pull-debian-source python-jsmin
> 
> dget -u 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-jsmin/python-jsmin_2.2.1-1.dsc
> 
> debdiff python-jsmin*.dsc > debdiff
> 
> lets look at the debdiff file:
> 
> 1) +  * Bump standards version. No changes needed.
ok

> 
> 
> I would also say to which version, otherwise it will become useless after two 
> or three bumps
> 
> 
> 2) +  * Change my name on the control file to match the changelog.
> 
> 
> not a problem, but I would change both to have the first char as upper-case, 
> instead of using
> all lowercase for your name
> 
> 
> 3) you are adding entries to a previous changelog entry
> +  * Add pristine-tar to source VCS.
> 
> 
> (this appears to be a change in *this* release)
> 
> 
> 4) and changing one signature date of some old release
> 
> - -- Gustavo Panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:46:59 +0800
> + -- Gustavo Panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:46:59 +0800

commit b9bd75f323f772460e07da19d875ee8366f93bdf is to blame, I did the
change that. I guess the uploader didn't pull after I pushed.


good catch, thanks
> 
> python-all (>= 2.6.6-3~),
> +  dh-python,
> 
> 
> ^^ there is a 
> instead of spaces (this makes vim sad)
done, i'm surprised wrap-and-sort didn't fix it

> 
> I admit, they aren't really blockers, and the problem is in the git repo, 
> where somebody
> committed something different from the version that has been uploaded in 
> Debian.
> But I would take the opportunity to fix it once for all, starting from this 
> version.
> 
> What do you think about?
I've pushed again to alioth and mentors, thanks for your review

> 
> G.

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#835559: RFS: python-jsmin/2.2.1-1

2016-08-27 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Hello

I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package python-jsmin

It builds python-jsmin and python3-jsmin

This package contains a new upstream release.

python-jsmin (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release
  * Bump standards version. No changes needed.
  * Change my name on the control file to match the changelog.
  * Update copyright years.
  * Use https url for Vcs-Git url
  * Add dh-python to build depends.

The package is maintained on collab-main using git

Package can be built doing this

$ gbp clone https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/python-jsmin.git
$ cd python-jsmin
$ gbp buildpackage (--git-pbuilder is optional)

Alternatively, it can be downloaded from mentors

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-jsmin/python-jsmin_2.2.1-1.dsc

I'm a DM, I'd happily accept DM permissions to upload it to the archive


thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-08-22 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Gianfranco/BTS,

here is a new debdiff with the changes discused yesterday.

cheers



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog	2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Jonathan Wiltshire ]
+  * Update debhelper to compat level 9
+  * Standards version 3.9.6 no changes needed.
+  * Re-tab plugins/15-ip4tables and plugins/25-ip6tables
+
+  [ gustavo panizzo ]
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Starts netfilter-persistent service before network-pre.target,
+as suggested by systemd upstream. Thanks to Patrick Schleizer
+(Closes: #829640).
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:05:39 +0800
+
 iptables-persistent (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * [d52b9e] During flush, set policy before flushing rules (Closes: #749790)
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dh-systemd, po-debconf
-Standards-Version: 3.9.5
+Standards-Version: 3.9.6
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git/
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git
 
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -4,5 +4,5 @@
 	dh_installinit -- start 37 S . stop 37 0 1 6 .
 
 %:
-	dh --with systemd $@
+	dh $@ --with systemd
 
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
 	if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip_tables_names ]; then
 		echo "Warning: skipping IPv4 (no modules loaded)"
 	elif [ -x /sbin/iptables-save ]; then
-touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4
-chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4
+		touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4
+		chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4
 		iptables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v4
 		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
 			rc=1
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
 	if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip6_tables_names ]; then
 		log_action_cont_msg "Warning: skipping IPv6 (no modules loaded)"
 	elif [ -x /sbin/ip6tables-save ]; then
-touch /etc/iptables/rules.v6
-chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v6
+		touch /etc/iptables/rules.v6
+		chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v6
 		ip6tables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v6
 		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
 			rc=1
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service	2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,10 +1,16 @@
 [Unit]
 Description=netfilter persistent configuration
 DefaultDependencies=no
-Before=network.target
+
+Before=network-pre.target
+Wants=network-pre.target
+
 Wants=systemd-modules-load.service local-fs.target
 After=systemd-modules-load.service local-fs.target
 
+Conflicts=shutdown.target
+Before=shutdown.target
+
 [Service]
 Type=oneshot
 RemainAfterExit=yes
@@ -13,4 +19,3 @@
 
 [Install]
 WantedBy=multi-user.target
-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-08-22 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 08:58:26AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi,
Hello

> +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat2016-08-21 
> 07:05:06.0 +0200
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -7
> +9
> (this is usually wrong without bumping debhelper minimum version too)
> 
> -Standards-Version: 3.9.5
> +Standards-Version: 3.9.6
> 
> 
> -   dh --with systemd $@
> +   dh $@ --with systemd
> 
> 
> various:
> -touch /etc/iptables/rules.v*
> -chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v*
> +   touch /etc/iptables/rules.v*
> +   chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v*
> 
> 
> (seems an indentation change)
> 
> I don't think they are in an NMU scope

My bad, I based my work of the master branch of the git repo. I'll start
again using the released tag (and apply the same chages to the master)

I'll send another debdiff soon

thanks


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-08-22 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important


Hello,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on iptables-persistent
It closes an RC bug, I've validated the fix my machines with different network 
configurations.
the debdiff is attached

I've worked with iptables-persistent git repo but I won't push my changes until 
the updated package
is on the archive.

Also the binary can be downloaded from -mentors

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iptables-persistent/iptables-persistent_1.0.4+nmu1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Loads the firewall before network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd
upstream. (Closes: #829640).


thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog	2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Loads the firewall before network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd
+upstream. (Closes: #829640).
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:05:39 +0800
+
 iptables-persistent (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * [d52b9e] During flush, set policy before flushing rules (Closes: #749790)
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dh-systemd, po-debconf
-Standards-Version: 3.9.5
+Standards-Version: 3.9.6
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git/
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git
 
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -4,5 +4,5 @@
 	dh_installinit -- start 37 S . stop 37 0 1 6 .
 
 %:
-	dh --with systemd $@
+	dh $@ --with systemd
 
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
 	if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip_tables_names ]; then
 		echo "Warning: skipping IPv4 (no modules loaded)"
 	elif [ -x /sbin/iptables-save ]; then
-touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4
-chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4
+		touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4
+		chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4
 		iptables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v4
 		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
 			rc=1
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
 	if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip6_tables_names ]; then
 		log_action_cont_msg "Warning: skipping IPv6 (no modules loaded)"
 	elif [ -x /sbin/ip6tables-save ]; then
-touch /etc/iptables/rules.v6
-chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v6
+		touch /etc/iptables/rules.v6
+		chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v6
 		ip6tables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v6
 		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
 			rc=1
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service	2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 [Unit]
 Description=netfilter persistent configuration
 DefaultDependencies=no
-Before=network.target
+Before=network-pre.target
+Wants=network-pre.target
 Wants=sys

iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-08-21 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Hello,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on iptables-persistent
It closes an RC bug, I've validated the fix my machines with different network 
configurations.
the debdiff is attached

I've worked with iptables-persistent git repo but I won't push my changes until 
the updated package
is on the archive.

Also the binary can be downloaded from -mentors

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iptables-persistent/iptables-persistent_1.0.4+nmu1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Loads the firewall before network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd
upstream. (Closes: #829640).


thanks!

--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog	2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Loads the firewall before network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd
+upstream. (Closes: #829640).
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar>  Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:05:39 +0800
+
 iptables-persistent (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * [d52b9e] During flush, set policy before flushing rules (Closes: #749790)
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dh-systemd, po-debconf
-Standards-Version: 3.9.5
+Standards-Version: 3.9.6
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git/
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git
 
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -4,5 +4,5 @@
 	dh_installinit -- start 37 S . stop 37 0 1 6 .
 
 %:
-	dh --with systemd $@
+	dh $@ --with systemd
 
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
 	if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip_tables_names ]; then
 		echo "Warning: skipping IPv4 (no modules loaded)"
 	elif [ -x /sbin/iptables-save ]; then
-touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4
-chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4
+		touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4
+		chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4
 		iptables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v4
 		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
 			rc=1
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables	2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
 	if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip6_tables_names ]; then
 		log_action_cont_msg "Warning: skipping IPv6 (no modules loaded)"
 	elif [ -x /sbin/ip6tables-save ]; then
-touch /etc/iptables/rules.v6
-chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v6
+		touch /etc/iptables/rules.v6
+		chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v6
 		ip6tables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v6
 		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
 			rc=1
diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service
--- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service	2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800
+++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/systemd/netfilter-persistent.service	2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 [Unit]
 Description=netfilter persistent configuration
 DefaultDependencies=no
-Before=network.target
+Before=network-pre.target
+Wants=network-pre.target
 Wants=systemd-modules-load.service local-fs.target
 After=systemd-modules-load.service local-fs.target
 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

2016-07-29 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> >Gianfranco, i've uploaded version 1.3.0-1 to mentors, would you sponsor it?
> >
> >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.3.0-1.dsc
> 
> 
> uploaded with one change:
> Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/asciinema.git
> 
> 
> ^^ this is the updated Vcs field, gitweb is dead and unsupported (and broken)

still works for this pkg, i verified it. for consistency i will keep the
change on the next upload


> 
> thanks,

thank you!
> 
> G.

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa



Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

2016-07-29 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:26:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> >PS: can I ping you when I have the new asciinema package?
> 
> 
> I'm not a go developer, so somebody from your team might be better suitable
> to look at the packages, but you can count on me as a backup sponsor.
> (BTW go seems a really nice and funny language, so I might learn it one day)
> 
> 
> and if the package becomes Python again... even better, I can do it

Gianfranco, i've uploaded version 1.3.0-1 to mentors, would you sponsor it?

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.3.0-1.dsc
and git repo on alioth
ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/asciinema.git

thanks!

--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

2016-07-27 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:13:16PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
> 

Gianfranco

Upstream went back to Python, so I won't upload this version or its needed 
dependency, i
if you are interested in golang-github-creack-termios, you can take the package 
from alioth, its
ready IMHO, only 3 lintian warnings

- debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
  upstream doesn't do releases, I placed a debian/watch file
  in place in case they start doing them.
 
- no-upstream-changelog
  upstream doesn't keep a changelog
 
- extended-description-is-probably-too-short
  upstream readme.md file is
  only 1 sentence, this pkg is an small library there is not much to say
  about it

thanks for your time, I apologize for the change of plans.

PS: can I ping you when I have the new asciinema package?

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

2016-07-27 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:04:02AM +0200, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> Hello Gustavo,
> 
> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 03:17:29 PM gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > I'm the maintainer of asciinema, a while ago upstream decided to rewrite
> > it in Go, previously it was a Python app.
> 
> It seems upstream went back to Python:
> http://blog.asciinema.org/post/and-now-for-something-completely-different/
:-O

> 
> I think it is better to update to 1.3, and skip the Go release.
I will do that, what a waste of time!.

thanks for the catch, I had the package ready for some time, I didn't
check their blog




> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> -- 
>  Daniele Tricoli 'eriol'
>  https://mornie.org



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

2016-07-27 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
Hello

I'm the maintainer of asciinema, a while ago upstream decided to rewrite
it in Go, previously it was a Python app.

I've made a package for it, and the 2 dependencies that were missing in
the archive, one of those dependencies was already sponsored/uploaded,
but the sponsor has no time to sponsor the 2 missing packages.

asciinema
git.debian.org:/git/pkg-go/packages/asciinema.git
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.2.0-1.dsc

golang-github-creack-termios
git.debian.org:/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-creack-termios.git
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-creack-termios/golang-github-creack-termios_0.0~git20160520.0.01ff290-1.dsc

I'm a DM, I already maintain other packages and have upload permissions,
this uploads would close 3 bugs.

I thank in advance any review/sponsor, upstream doesn't support the
Python version anymore so I would like to have the Go version in time
for the freeze



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-21 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)


On 2015-07-21 19:02, Johannes Schauer wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Quoting gustavo panizzo (gfa) (2015-07-21 08:05:47)
 On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote:
 crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking 
 for a
 way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64.
 But crossbuilding from linux (which I'll just assume Daniel runs on their 
 host)
 to hurd or kfreebsd will lead to different results than natively building on
 these kernels in (probably) most cases.
 would that make the test useless? I build test using qemu-static-
 before upload to debian to avoid FTBFS when the package reach the buildd
 network
 
 are you using qemu-static- to build on linux for hurd or kfreebsd?
no, in the quick test i did it didn't work (their binfmt appears to be
the same)


 
 The *only* 100% sure way to know if your package builds on the buildds is... 
 to
 upload and build your packages on the buildds.

that's the thing i want to avoid, useless uploads

 
 The second best way is to build either on real hardware (your own or a
 porterbox) or in a virtual machine which emulates a whole machine, including a
 kernel.
 
 The third best way is to only emulate the architecture but not the kernel. 
 This
 is what qemu-user does. This will probably let you run into kernel specific
 problems.

[ snip ]

well what I do worked in the test I did, for example trinity 1.5-1 FTBFS
on mips, mipsel and sparc due a missing include header, that i could
catch using qemu-static-XXX.

I agree that more complex interactions between the userspace and the
kernel may not work. I tough that qemu-static-XXX would be better than
you show, but hey! I didn't load a kernel so it is kinda expected


I didn't want to but I think i will create a set of vm, one for each
debian arch, and automate the build on it, I looked how to create a
buildd machine but is think is too much. I will stick to libvirt+scripts
to launch the build on different arch.

:( i didn't want to use more vm, pbuilder is so cool and easy to maintain



 
 And sure, if your package does noting fancy but just calls cp a couple of 
 times
 to put everything in the right location, then nothing will go wrong with the
 qemu-user method. But if your package is that simple, then you probably also
 don't need to test it.

again, dependencies and includes sometimes are different across arch,
that could be spotted

 
 cheers, josch
 

cheers

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55af07f5.60...@zumbi.com.ar



Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-21 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)


On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote:

 
 crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking for 
 a
 way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64.
 But crossbuilding from linux (which I'll just assume Daniel runs on their 
 host)
 to hurd or kfreebsd will lead to different results than natively building on
 these kernels in (probably) most cases.

would that make the test useless? I build test using qemu-static-
before upload to debian to avoid FTBFS when the package reach the buildd
network

i'm just starting to do it but it appears to work fine

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55ade13b.80...@zumbi.com.ar



Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-24 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On 06/24/2014 09:41 AM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist
 
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm

i'm a lilyterm user, i offer my help to co-maintain the package



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a9b49b.9050...@zumbi.com.ar



Re: unable to upload on mentors after dput failure

2014-02-12 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
wait until the incomplete upload gets deleted on mentors.debian.net. typically, 
an hour 
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

sent from mobile

bilibop project quid...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi,

I wanted to upload a new version of my package on mentors.debian.net
today. Unfortunately, the dput process has been interrupted, due to a
bad connection on my side. Only the .dsc, and ~ half of the .tar.xz
have been uploaded. Now, when I try to dput again the same source
package, I get an error (Uploading bilibop_0.4.21.dsc: Upload failed:
403 Forbidden). Obviously, my page shows no package, and I have tried
dput --force. Is there a way to solve this issue?

Thanks
quidame


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/a937bae1-bcae-4b7c-a79e-8a6c18e52...@email.android.com



Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

2013-11-16 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On 11/11/2013 11:45 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:

 
 This work is less useful for Daily developers, since schroot can do what
 docker does just fine (e.g. for sbuild, etc), but docker is going to be
 a huge win for a cluster of build nodes for debile.
i don't care for it to build packages, i'm happy with pbuilder for that
task.
i want to see if it can replace my lxc containers, i have many of them
in production,test,dev,etc environments, but i could use a better
management system for them

thanks!

 
 Much love!
   Paul
 


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

2013-11-11 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On 11/11/2013 08:36 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
 
 In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use
 Docker. I've got it packaged and it'll be in Debian soon.

do you have a package, even preview quality, to use it?
i would check git.d.o but is down :(


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#703638: ITP: cloudfuse -- FUSE filesystem for Swift object storage.

2013-03-21 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar

* Package name: cloudfuse
  Version : git20130124.809b07e 
  Upstream Author : Michael Barton m...@weirdlooking.com
* URL : https://github.com/redbo/cloudfuse
* License : BSD
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : FUSE filesystem for Swift object storage

Cloudfuse is a FUSE application which provides access to 
an installation of OpenStack's Swift.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130321181350.11420.23378.reportbug@localhost



Re: fix for rc bug #665199

2012-11-03 Thread gustavo panizzo


Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo  wrote:
 hello, i've prepared  an updated version of slapd package which fix
 the bug #665199

Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable.  However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive enough:

  * Fix a bug while upgrading from squeeze to wheezy (Closes: #665199).

Could you be a bit clearer?  Something along the lines of regenerate
slapd database in postinst during upgrade process would be good.

i've upload an updated package with better changlelog, same url

thanks


Re: Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199

2012-11-03 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On 11/03/2012 04:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa
 wrote:
 updated package can be found at 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc

 
 This is not the correct procedure for an NMU.  Please send a
 debdiff to the bug report.
 

sending it again

$ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapacl link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapadd link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapauth link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapcat link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapd link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapdn link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapindex link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapschema link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slaptest link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd

Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapacl link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapauth link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapcat link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapd link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapdn link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapindex link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slappasswd link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapschema link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slaptest link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)

Depends: libc6 (= 2.12), libdb5.1, libgcrypt11 (= 1.4.5),
libgnutls26 (= 2.12.17-0), libldap-2.4-2 (= [-2.4.31-1.1),-]
{+2.4.31-1),+} libltdl7 (= 2.4.2), libodbc1 (= 2.2.11) | unixodbc
(= 2.2.11), libperl5.14 (= 5.14.2), libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.24), libslp1,
libwrap0 (= 7.6-4~), coreutils (= 4.5.1-1), psmisc, perl ( 5.8.0)
| libmime-base64-perl, adduser, lsb-base (= 3.2-13)
Version: [-2.4.31-1.1-] {+2.4.31-1+}


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5095edb5.1070...@zumbi.com.ar



openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1

2012-11-03 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
tags 665199 + patch
tags 665199 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1)
attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows 

Regards.

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst
--- openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst
+++ openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@
 	postinst_initial_configuration
 else
 	postinst_upgrade_configuration
+
+if [ $MODE = upgrade ]; then
+load_databases
+fi
+
 fi
 
 db_stop || true
diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog
--- openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog
+++ openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+openldap (2.4.31-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fixes a bug in slapd postinst script. When upgrading, the script 
+failed to regenerate the database. Closes: #665199.
+
+ -- gustavo panizzo g...@zumbi.com.ar  Thu, 03 Nov 2012 02:11:45 -0300
+
 openldap (2.4.31-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.


fix for rc bug #665199

2012-11-02 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
hello, i've prepared  an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199


debdiff output

$ debdiff slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb 
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapacl link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapadd link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapauth link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapcat link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapd link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapdn link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapindex link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapschema link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slaptest link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd

Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapacl link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapauth link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapcat link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapd link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapdn link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapindex link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slappasswd link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slapschema link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/sbin/slaptest link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)

Depends: libc6 (= 2.12), libdb5.1, libgcrypt11 (= 1.4.5), libgnutls26 (= 
2.12.17-0), libldap-2.4-2 (= [-2.4.31-1.1),-] {+2.4.31-1),+} libltdl7 (= 
2.4.2), libodbc1 (= 2.2.11) | unixodbc (= 2.2.11), libperl5.14 (= 5.14.2), 
libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.24), libslp1, libwrap0 (= 7.6-4~), coreutils (= 4.5.1-1), 
psmisc, perl ( 5.8.0) | libmime-base64-perl, adduser, lsb-base (= 3.2-13)
Version: [-2.4.31-1.1-] {+2.4.31-1+}


piuparts output (i'm running piuparts from git, piatti's branch)

$ sudo python piuparts.py --warn-on-others --warn-on-leftovers-after-purge 
--skip-logrotatefiles-test  --install-remove-install  -b 
/var/cache/pbuilder/squeeze.i386.tgz  -d squeeze  --log-level=info 
/var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb 
Guessed: debian
0m0.0s INFO: 
--
0m0.0s INFO: To quickly glance what went wrong, scroll down to the bottom of 
this logfile.
0m0.0s INFO: FAQ available at http://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ
0m0.0s INFO: 
--
0m0.0s INFO: piuparts version __PIUPARTS_VERSION__ starting up.
0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: piuparts.py --warn-on-others 
--warn-on-leftovers-after-purge --skip-logrotatefiles-test 
--install-remove-install -b /var/cache/pbuilder/squeeze.i386.tgz -d squeeze 
--log-level=info /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb
0m0.0s INFO: Running on: Linux io 3.5-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 
3.5.5-1~experimental.1 x86_64
0m17.5s INFO: Installation of ['tmp/piuparts-depends-dummy.deb'] ok
0m18.5s INFO: Installation of ['tmp/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb'] ok
0m18.7s INFO: Reinstalling after remove
0m19.0s INFO: Installation of ['tmp/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb'] ok
0m28.3s INFO: PASS: Installation and purging test.
0m28.3s INFO: apt-cache knows about the following packages: slapd
0m37.6s INFO: Installation of ['tmp/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb'] ok
0m54.2s INFO: Warning: Package purging left files on system:
  /var/lib/ldap/ not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIGnot owned
  /var/lib/ldap/__db.001 not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/__db.002 not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/__db.003 not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/__db.004 not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/__db.005 not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/__db.006 not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/alocknot owned
  /var/lib/ldap/dn2id.bdbnot owned
  /var/lib/ldap/id2entry.bdb not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/log.01   not owned
  /var/lib/ldap/objectClass.bdb  not owned

0m54.2s INFO: PASS: Installation, upgrade and purging tests.
0m55.1s INFO: PASS: All tests.
0m55.1s INFO: piuparts run ends.


updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc


attached are the piuparts log for the wheezy and updated package

thanks!


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



openldap.nmu.log.bz2
Description: Binary data


openldap.wheezy.log.bz2
Description: Binary data


asking for package removal

2012-09-21 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
hello
i was going through the list of rc bugs for wheezy and i found
#687579.

while i think the package should be removed (dead upstream, doesn't
work with wheeze version of it's dependencies) i'm not the maintainer.

how long do i have to wait to maintainer to reply before ask to ftp
team to remove the package? can i (neither maintainer, uploader or DD)
ask for removals? 


is nothing personal with the package or the maintainer, is was just
doing QA.

thanks

PS: i wasn't sure if send this to mentors or qa

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120921144222.ga26...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: New Maintainer Question: Upgrade to Sid?

2012-09-20 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:04:04PM -0700, Eric wrote:
 How would I build a package without a .dsc file using cowbuilder?
2 ways:

- dpkg-source -b on parent dir

- pdebuild on the sources dir

i found pdebuild+cowbuilder a very nice combination 


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120921015401.ga20...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: [RC-FIX] RFS: canna

2012-07-28 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
i forgot to mention

i need an sponsor to upload this fix.

thanks

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:11:54AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
 hello
 i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756.
 
 changes since last upload:
 
   * QA upload.
   * Fix bug in postrm scripts (Closes: #681756).
   * Fix a dangling symlink (/usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic) on canna package.
 
 dsc file could be found on mentors
 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/canna/canna_3.7p3-10.dsc
 
 thanks!
 

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120728151748.gb12...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: [RC-FIX] RFS: canna

2012-07-28 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:34:39AM +0900, d...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:11:54AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
  i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756.
 
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/canna/canna_3.7p3-10.dsc
 
 thank you for your works, but i am afraid it does not fix RC bug #681756.
 your package is adding a removal of /etc/default/canna.dpkg-old,
 but bug#681756 says below.
 
  0m27.4s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have disappeared:
/etc/canna/owned by: canna, libcanna1g
/etc/canna/default.canna   not owned
i cannot reproduce that bug, i got this when i run piuparts against
3.7p3-9

sudo piuparts -k --log-level=info 
/var/cache/apt/archives/canna_3.7p3-9_i386.deb 
Guessed: debian
0m0.0s INFO: 
--
0m0.0s INFO: To quickly glance what went wrong, scroll down to the bottom of 
this logfile.
0m0.0s INFO: FAQ available at http://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ
0m0.0s INFO: 
--
0m0.0s INFO: piuparts version 0.45 starting up.
0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: /usr/sbin/piuparts -k --log-level=info 
/var/cache/apt/archives/canna_3.7p3-9_i386.deb
0m0.0s INFO: Running on: Linux io 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 28 09:39:55 UTC 
2012 x86_64
3m10.6s INFO: Installation of ['tmp/canna_3.7p3-9_i386.deb'] ok
3m11.8s ERROR: WARN: Broken symlinks:
  /usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic
3m15.0s INFO: PASS: Installation and purging test.
3m16.5s INFO: apt-cache knows about the following packages: canna
3m19.7s ERROR: WARN: Broken symlinks:
  /usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic
3m20.3s INFO: Installation of ['tmp/canna_3.7p3-9_i386.deb'] ok
3m21.4s ERROR: WARN: Broken symlinks:
  /usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic
3m24.9s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
  /etc/default/canna.dpkg-oldnot owned

3m24.9s ERROR: FAIL: Installation, upgrade and purging tests.

 
 so, would you please revise your package?
i will


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120728230506.ga24...@io.zumbi.com.ar



[RC-FIX] RFS: canna

2012-07-27 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
hello
i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756.

changes since last upload:

  * QA upload.
  * Fix bug in postrm scripts (Closes: #681756).
  * Fix a dangling symlink (/usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic) on canna package.

dsc file could be found on mentors

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/canna/canna_3.7p3-10.dsc

thanks!

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120728051154.ga10...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: Any script to populate debian/copyright file ?

2012-07-16 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:

 I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
 use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/' 

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120716134119.ga14...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: Any script to populate debian/copyright file ?

2012-07-16 Thread gustavo panizzo
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa 
 g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
 
  On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
 
   I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
  to
   use as a reference,
  cd /usr/share/doc
  find . -name copyright |xargs grep
  'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
 
 
 Sorry, but not helpful. They only represent ~13% on nearly default Wheezy
 setup and
i don't know (or care) how many packages use copyright format 1.0

vavoom, i know for sure, is a multi-license package using copyright
format 1.0
mysql server too

 second package I semi-randomly piked has:
if you *really* want to get your package into debian, you should look
more than just 2 packages - IMHO


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120716145218.gb14...@io.zumbi.com.ar



how often should ask for upload?

2012-05-28 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
hi

after getting my first pkg in debian, i wonder how often should i
prepare new revisions of it and ask to potential sponsors to upload it
to the archive? 

should i wait until the pkg has a many bugs? or each bug deserves an
upload?

thanks

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120528155516.ga24...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: how often should ask for upload?

2012-05-28 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
 
 Did you receive a notification for the comment that was added on this page ?
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/vavoom
no

i've added what was missing to the changelog (DEP-5, DEP-3,
wrap-and-sort,etc) i thought that kind of changes were not necesary to
be added to changelog, policy disagrees with me

i'm playing with hardened flags now 
-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120528205047.gb5...@io.zumbi.com.ar



Re: Seeking advice on automounter-like daemon starting at boot

2010-10-17 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 07:13:52PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
 Hello, mentors
disclaimer: i'm not a DD/DM

 I could make udisks-glue run as another user (say, nobody), but that
 would mean that the default config would not be able to mount devices.
 That's because PolicyKit will only allow udisks to mount devices if
 the user is a local user (logged in to ConsoleKit via
 ck-launch-session, the PAM connector or GDM) or the root user. I
 *think* I could provide PolicyKit policies to allow an user created by
 udisks-glue to mount those devices without root privileges, but I have
 no idea where to look for examples on how this might be done. I also
 don't know if it's worth the effort.
 
 Any tips on how I should proceed? There's no other udisks automounters
 in Debian (there's a PPA package for [3], but it doesn't have an init
 script or a system-wide configuration file). I see the following
 options:
 
 a) Submit the package as it is, i.e., with udisks-glue running as root
 b) Run udisks-glue as root, but don't start the init script by default
 c) Get rid of the init script, but keep the system-wide configuration file
 d) Create an user udisks, add a PolicyKit rule to allow it to mount
 device files, use that for the init script (not even sure it's
 possible)
how would it leave the file permissions on the mounted filesystems?
Would them be readable/writable by local users?

 
 Suggestions are greatly appreciated.
 
 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594746
 [2] http://github.com/fernandotcl/udisks-glue
 [3] https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/udisks-automounter/trunk
 
 
 Regards,
 Fernando
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinrgdwwicju=ixqdjirjay42gj=eydqbrg_s...@mail.gmail.com
 

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Seeking advice on automounter-like daemon starting at boot

2010-10-17 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
  d) Create an user udisks, add a PolicyKit rule to allow it to mount
  device files, use that for the init script (not even sure it's
  possible)
 how would it leave the file permissions on the mounted filesystems?
 Would them be readable/writable by local users?
i was referring to option D
if the udisks user has plugdev (or something like that) as primary
group and the filesystem is mounted with umask 220 it should work (if
the local user is part of plugdev group)



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


RFS: bareftp (NMU, RC bugfix)

2010-10-06 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.4-1.1
of my package bareftp.

It builds these binary packages:
bareftp- FTP client for GNOME

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 598284
security related bug, CVE-2010-3350


The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bareftp
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bareftp/bareftp_0.3.4-1.1.dsc


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


creating a manpage from a GFDL text

2010-10-05 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
Hi folks,

i would like to create a man page for vavoom, based on a wiki page
licensed as GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
What can i do? GFDL is not free for debian, and my pkg is for main.

thanks!
-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: creating a manpage from a GFDL text

2010-10-05 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
am i reading this correctly? 
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001

is possible to include documentation licensed as GFDL 1.2 :)

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:17:06PM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 i would like to create a man page for vavoom, based on a wiki page
 licensed as GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
 What can i do? GFDL is not free for debian, and my pkg is for main.
 
 thanks!
 -- 
 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
 



-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


RFS: vavoom

2010-09-30 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package vavoom.

* Package name: vavoom
  Version : 1.32-1
  Upstream Author : Janis Legzdinsh vav...@vavoom-engine.com 
* URL : http://www.vavoom-engine.com
* License : GPL
  Section : games

It builds these binary packages:
vavoom - The most advanced Doom/Heretic/Hexen/Strife source port around!

The package appears to be lintian clean, also it builds on pbuilder.

The upload would fix these bugs: 598406

My motivation for maintaining this package is: i had to create this package to 
play hexen, later i polish it, and now i'm sharing it.
i don't plan to maintain this package by myself, i would like to co-maintain it 
on pkg-games team


The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vavoom
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vavoom/vavoom_1.32-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 gustavo panizzo 

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA  BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


RFS: kismet (updated package)

2010-07-26 Thread gustavo panizzo
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2010-07-R1-4.2
of my package kismet.

It builds these binary packages:
kismet - Wireless 802.11 monitoring tool

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 530111, 558773, 572593

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kismet
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kismet/kismet_2010-07-R1-4.2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

PS:
I CC'ed the last uploader and the maintainer 

Kind regards


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature