Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
control: tags -1 moreinfo >https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd can you please remove moreinfo once the package enters unstable? thanks G. > the same for libvpd applies here > > "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" > > maybe something like > License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception > > is better (check lintian if complains) Fixed and lintian doesn't complain. Also, as for libvpd, I added all autoconf files and others. I checked with license-reconcile and I think I forgot nobody. > abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) > ;; > > useless ^^ done > apt-get install -t experimental check-all-the-things: pity, I just realize, this is really a command .. > check-all-the-things > > > $ codespell --quiet-level=3 > > > $ cppcheck -j1 --quiet -f . | grep -vF 'cppcheck: error: could not find or > open any of the paths given.' > > > # Parsing /proc/cpuinfo is not portable at all, use /sys instead. > $ grep -rF /proc/cpuinfo . > > > > package outdated ... updated. I also trimmed d/rules. Remaining lintians : P: lsvpd source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature I: lsvpd: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/sbin/lscfg For the latter CPPFLAGS is given to the compiler : $ dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./config -I./src/include -Wall -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DDEST_DIR='"/usr"' -DVPD_VERSION='"1.7.7"' -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o src/output/lsvpd.o src/output/lsvpd.cpp$ F. > other stuff LGTM > > G. > > > Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 18:00, Frederic Bonnard> ha scritto: > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsvpd" > > Package name: lsvpd > Version : 1.7.6-1 > Upstream Author : lsvpd team > URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ > License : GPL-2+ > Section : misc > > It builds those binary packages: > > lsvpd - Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD) > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsvpd/lsvpd_1.7.6-1.dsc > > More information about lsvpd can be obtained from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ > > Note: > This is for Power architectures. > I initially packaged this for Ubuntu Trusty. I pulled it from Ubuntu did a > few > changes and here it is. It would need to be synced with Ubuntu. > > > Regards, > Frederic Bonnard >
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
Hi, new packaging uploaded : https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsvpd/lsvpd_1.7.7-1.dsc > the same for libvpd applies here > > "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" > > maybe something like > License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception > > is better (check lintian if complains) Fixed and lintian doesn't complain. Also, as for libvpd, I added all autoconf files and others. I checked with license-reconcile and I think I forgot nobody. > abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) > ;; > > useless ^^ done > apt-get install -t experimental check-all-the-things: pity, I just realize, this is really a command .. > check-all-the-things > > > $ codespell --quiet-level=3 > > > $ cppcheck -j1 --quiet -f . | grep -vF 'cppcheck: error: could not find or > open any of the paths given.' > > > # Parsing /proc/cpuinfo is not portable at all, use /sys instead. > $ grep -rF /proc/cpuinfo . > > > > package outdated ... updated. I also trimmed d/rules. Remaining lintians : P: lsvpd source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature I: lsvpd: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/sbin/lscfg For the latter CPPFLAGS is given to the compiler : $ dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./config -I./src/include -Wall -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DDEST_DIR='"/usr"' -DVPD_VERSION='"1.7.7"' -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o src/output/lsvpd.o src/output/lsvpd.cpp$ F. > other stuff LGTM > > G. > > > Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 18:00, Frederic Bonnard> ha scritto: > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsvpd" > > Package name: lsvpd > Version : 1.7.6-1 > Upstream Author : lsvpd team > URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ > License : GPL-2+ > Section : misc > > It builds those binary packages: > > lsvpd - Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD) > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsvpd/lsvpd_1.7.6-1.dsc > > More information about lsvpd can be obtained from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ > > Note: > This is for Power architectures. > I initially packaged this for Ubuntu Trusty. I pulled it from Ubuntu did a > few > changes and here it is. It would need to be synced with Ubuntu. > > > Regards, > Frederic Bonnard >
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
Hi >Spaces are not allowed in license names. But here the license name is >just “GPL-2+”. > >Let me quote the relevant part of the spec: >“An exception or clarification to a license is signalled in plain text, >by appending ‘with exception’ to the short name.” probably when I tried a) this wasn't implemented b) I made some typo that triggered lintian warning. Happy to see this works correctly, so to the sponsoree, nevermind this part :) Thanks Jakub! Gianfranco
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
* Gianfranco Costamagna, 2016-06-02, 17:07: "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception "FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5. If it is not appropriate to use it in this case, then you should explain why, because it's not obvious. the difference is just removing the spaces, IIRC lintian was triggering issues on dep-5 format when spaces were used. Spaces are not allowed in license names. But here the license name is just “GPL-2+”. Let me quote the relevant part of the spec: “An exception or clarification to a license is signalled in plain text, by appending ‘with exception’ to the short name.” -- Jakub Wilk
mail formatting (was: Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD))
On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:07:08 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > [I didn't read rest of thi>s mail because it made my head hurt. > >Gianfranco, please write complete sentences, and please don't top-post.] > yes, sorry :) > (I have a bad MUA, sometimes top-posting is necessary :( ) No, it's not. Please get a sane MUA or wait with your replies until you have access to one. I really appreciate the work you do on mentoring but I basically stopped reading your mails months ago because they make my head explode. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Tanita Tikaram: Happy Taxi signature.asc Description: Digital Signature signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
Hi, >The same... what? I can't parse this sentence. the same review done for the other packages applies to this one (yes, indeed I should have written it better, I explained it somewhere else) >"FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5.>If it is not >appropriate to use it in this case, then you should explain >why, because it's not obvious. >"License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" > >maybe something like >License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception the difference is just removing the spaces, IIRC lintian was triggering issues on dep-5 format when spaces were used. Isn't it the case anymore? [I didn't read rest of thi>s mail because it made my head hurt. >Gianfranco, please write complete sentences, and please don't top-post.] yes, sorry :) (I have a bad MUA, sometimes top-posting is necessary :( ) G.
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
* Gianfranco Costamagna, 2016-06-02, 16:19: the same for libvpd applies here The same... what? I can't parse this sentence. "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception "FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5. If it is not appropriate to use it in this case, then you should explain why, because it's not obvious. [I didn't read rest of this mail because it made my head hurt. Gianfranco, please write complete sentences, and please don't top-post.] -- Jakub Wilk
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo the same for libvpd applies here "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception is better (check lintian if complains) abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) ;; useless ^^ apt-get install -t experimental check-all-the-things: check-all-the-things $ codespell --quiet-level=3 $ cppcheck -j1 --quiet -f . | grep -vF 'cppcheck: error: could not find or open any of the paths given.' # Parsing /proc/cpuinfo is not portable at all, use /sys instead. $ grep -rF /proc/cpuinfo . package outdated other stuff LGTM G. Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 18:00, Frederic Bonnardha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsvpd" Package name: lsvpd Version : 1.7.6-1 Upstream Author : lsvpd team URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ License : GPL-2+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: lsvpd - Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsvpd/lsvpd_1.7.6-1.dsc More information about lsvpd can be obtained from http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ Note: This is for Power architectures. I initially packaged this for Ubuntu Trusty. I pulled it from Ubuntu did a few changes and here it is. It would need to be synced with Ubuntu. Regards, Frederic Bonnard
Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsvpd" Package name: lsvpd Version : 1.7.6-1 Upstream Author : lsvpd team URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ License : GPL-2+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: lsvpd - Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsvpd/lsvpd_1.7.6-1.dsc More information about lsvpd can be obtained from http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ Note: This is for Power architectures. I initially packaged this for Ubuntu Trusty. I pulled it from Ubuntu did a few changes and here it is. It would need to be synced with Ubuntu. Regards, Frederic Bonnard