Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Hi Daniel, On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 03:10:05PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.6.1-1 of my package secpanel. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.6.1-1.dsc Thanks for stepping up as new maintainer for this package. And sorry for taking so long for getting you a feedback. 1. You move all *.patch to *.diff - why? Was there any reason the *.patch was conflicting with something? 2. You have touched all the (now named) *.diff files yet not bothered to add any notion whether they have been sent upstream or if not why so. 3. You reverse the order of the patches which seems somewhat unintended. Obviously it works still though. 4. You run override_dh_fixperms in your own writing withouth actually calling dh_fixperms itself. With this you make lintian freak out and if this is _really_ required please add a lintian overrides. 5. More as a cosmetic note: There is no Vcs lines in debian/control. Is there no VCS? 6. debian/README.source is obsolete with newer versions of dpkg. No need to repack the source even if the directory structure is totally wild. 7. You no longer ship /usr/share/secpanel/gui.tcl set executable. Probably missing in your fixperms. You may want to check the full debdiff of the old and the new changes file. I've fixed 4. and built, signed, uploaded your new package. Please have a look at the rest and send me the updated package if any of this needs further fixing. -- Best regrds, Kilian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.6.1-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 608314 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.6.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards daniel echeverry -- Epsilon http://www.rinconinformatico.net http://www.fitnessdeportes.com http://www.dragonjar.org Linux user: #477840 Debian user
RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-4 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 591322 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.4-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chris Silva 1AB5FEF8 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: secpanel (updated package - ITA )
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 175738, 289151, 305134, 305135, 317063 This is the changelog: secpanel (1:0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release, redone debian packaging from scratch (Closes: #305135) (LP: #243235) This version fixes: + Application must be killed when exiting with Close Button (Closes: #289151) + scp errors when directory name contains a single quote (Closes: #305134) + Program crashes on scp connection to remote host. (Closes: #175738) * New maintainer, thanks to Nick Rusnov for the prior work on secpanel (Closes: #317063) * Update to debhelper level 7 * debian/control: + Switch to tcl8.5 and tk8.5 in Depends + Added dpatch to Build-Depends + synopsis should not read like the start of a sentence, removed indefinite article A * Updated debian/copyright * Switched to dpatch: + 01_path_fix.dpatch fixes libdir path + 02_add_interpreted_sequence.dpatch adds #!/usr/bin/tclsh to convert_history.tcl and export_profiles.tcl * Updated to standards version 3.8.0 + Added Hompage field * Added .desktop file and .xpm icon (from Ubuntu) * Bump epoch to fix funny upstream version numbering scheme * Added a watch file -- Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:28:52 +0200 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The upload would fix these bugs: 305135, 317063 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Bruno Costacurta pgpgSmgkLk6tR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Sunday 08 July 2007 13:05, Paul Wise wrote: On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5? I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1 Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ? By debhelper 5, I mean debian/compat 5 and debian/control Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5) Corrected. Have you sent the manual page upstream? Sorry. What do you mean ? Part of a Debian maintainer's activities are to contribute useful changes to upstream. For many upstream projects, manual pages and other documentation are useful. Here, 'send the manual page upstream' means file a bug or send a mail asking for the upstream authors to integrate the manual page you have written into their software/package. Currently did not wrote any specific man. I'm trying to be the maintainer of this orphaned package. I included new upstream version into 0.5.2-1. Also had a look to previous (quite old: more than two years old) still open bugs but was not able to reproduce these bugs. Bye, Bruno You have no ' Homepage: url' in the package description Is this mandatory ? Nope, just a good idea. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise pgpT27HCGZiR2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Otherwise it looks fine. One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a look at those to see whether you can address them? Thijs Hello, I uploaded a 0.5.2-1 version to debian-mentors site which include this new upstream. I'm a newbie as maintainer : I suppose I can close this bug #305135 once this package is uploaded to Debian repos by a mentor ? Thanks for attention; Bye, Bruno pgpxT7ySraflV.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The upload would fix these bugs: 317063 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Bruno Costacurta pgpV7M7h4ZUGC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On 7/10/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a newbie as maintainer : I suppose I can close this bug #305135 once this package is uploaded to Debian repos by a mentor ? Usually one would put something like this in the changelog: * New upstream release (Closes: #305135) If it gets uploaded before you make that change, then send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] like so: - Version: 0.5.2-1 New upstream version was uploaded, thanks for reporting. - -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Saturday 07 July 2007 14:52, Paul Wise wrote: On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.di ff.gz No time for sponsoring, some comments: Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says using what upstream has is better. To avoid lintian error 'shell-script-fails-syntax-check' as 'sh -N' complains (logically about unrecognized syntax from wish. Might want to send the /usr/lib - /usr/share change upstream debian/*.debhelper should not be in the diff.gz at all, make sure you built your package correctly Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5? I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1 Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ? your debian/changelog is corrupted, perhaps you accidentally pasted some part of the upstream changelog into it? Indeed. I corrected format to respect changelog format. Have you sent the manual page upstream? Sorry. What do you mean ? You have no ' Homepage: url' in the package description Is this mandatory ? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise Thanks for your attention. Bye, Bruno pgpBM0sBAPAxs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5? I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1 Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ? By debhelper 5, I mean debian/compat 5 and debian/control Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5) Have you sent the manual page upstream? Sorry. What do you mean ? Part of a Debian maintainer's activities are to contribute useful changes to upstream. For many upstream projects, manual pages and other documentation are useful. Here, 'send the manual page upstream' means file a bug or send a mail asking for the upstream authors to integrate the manual page you have written into their software/package. You have no ' Homepage: url' in the package description Is this mandatory ? Nope, just a good idea. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.diff.gz No time for sponsoring, some comments: Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says using what upstream has is better. Might want to send the /usr/lib - /usr/share change upstream debian/*.debhelper should not be in the diff.gz at all, make sure you built your package correctly Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5? your debian/changelog is corrupted, perhaps you accidentally pasted some part of the upstream changelog into it? Have you sent the manual page upstream? You have no ' Homepage: url' in the package description -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 317063 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Bruno Costacurta -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 -- pgpkxN2trj544.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The upload would fix these bugs: 317063 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Bruno Costacurta -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 -- pgpLSpSJBz88p.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
Hi Bruno, On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:01, Bruno Costacurta wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4 of my package secpanel. Thanks for your effort to adopt an orphaned package. I've taken a look and have the following points: - Why the strange version number 0.41+0.4.2? - You've made two changes like this: -#!/bin/sh +#!/usr/bin/wish but do not document that in the changelog. - You seemed to have switched the package from non-native to Debian native, perhaps an accident? If you use debuild to build your package you will be warned of that. Otherwise it looks fine. Thijs pgpXdbdc0WTPP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Otherwise it looks fine. One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a look at those to see whether you can address them? Thijs pgpI0XF2rc02N.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi Bruno, On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:01, Bruno Costacurta wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4 of my package secpanel. Thanks for your effort to adopt an orphaned package. I meet few Debian guys and they reckon this is the best way to start giving collaboration (modest as a newbie) to Debian. I've taken a look and have the following points: - Why the strange version number 0.41+0.4.2? Indeed. I was ot sure about which numbering I should adopt and try to follow current one as a first upload. - You've made two changes like this: -#!/bin/sh +#!/usr/bin/wish but do not document that in the changelog. Right. Changelog to be completed. - You seemed to have switched the package from non-native to Debian native, perhaps an accident? If you use debuild to build your package you will be warned of that. I used dpkg-buildpackage. I did not notice this switch. Should I use 'debuild' and leave dpkg-buildpackage ? Otherwise it looks fine. Question: can I submit (still via mentors-debian) a new version called 0.42 including these corrections / remarks ? Thijs Thanks for your attention. Bye, Bruno -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key : http://www.costacurta.org/keys/bruno_costacurta_pgp_key.html Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 --
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:01:39 +0200 Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4 of my package secpanel. Small typo in debian/control: managining -- bye ranf signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Otherwise it looks fine. One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a look at those to see whether you can address them? Thijs I'll update with latest upstream and upload to debian-mentors. Bye, Bruno -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 -- pgprUn4WHtBCY.pgp Description: PGP signature
