PyconUS 2016

2016-05-21 Thread Barry Warsaw
Pycon 2016 starts in one week in Portland OR, USA.  I'll be there for the
duration (flying in late Friday evening).  Who else is coming?

We should definitely have a Debian Python BOF, and perhaps a keysigning if
there isn't one organized for the larger Python community.  I'm sure we can
find fun things to talk about, like PyPy support, planning for Python 2's EOL,
the inevitable Python 3.6 transition[*], etc.

If you aren't already registered for the conference, sorry but it's too late.
I'm told it sold out months ago.  But there are 4 days of post-conference
sprinting and those are free to all.  You don't even have to be registered for
the conference to attend the sprints.

Hope to see some of you there!

https://us.pycon.org/2016/

Cheers,
-Barry

[*] Yay Doko!

https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=python3.6=names=all=all


pgpsADXX8kVov.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Status of ipython-qtconsole

2016-05-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 18:53:29 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:

> Hello,
> 
Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,

> I saw that a bunch of jupyter projects were uploaded into experimental.
> It would be nice to have also the qtconsole part.
> 
> I would like to know if there is already an effort in order to package the 
> current
> ipython-qtconsole.
> 
> I would be glade to help package this module.
> 
> One of my package (spyder) depends on this module
> 
Not as far as I know.  I'd be happy to review a package if that would
help.

Cheers,
Julien



Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review

2016-05-21 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Tiago,

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:19:46PM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
>> - lintian complains about site/js/bootstrap.min.js, AFAIKT the "site"
>> folder  contains the project's website. Maybe you would like to remove
>> it by repacking the source tarball.
>
> There's a patch[1] adding sources for bootstrap CSS/JS minified files,
> but this doesn't makes much sense, right? They aren't included in
> binary, nor the orig source tarball. I can repack it as a
> DSFG-compatible tarball, but would like to receive a second opinion
> about the mentioned patch, confirming if it is really useless.

I think it's better to put the missing sources in debian/missing-sources/
directory rather than patching them in.

(That is also suggested by the Lintian error description[1], and should
make that error disappear.)

[1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html

>> - It's more accurate to use "Expat" instead of "MIT" in d/copyright.
>
> I respectfully disagree with you at this point, as I had already
> talked about it on "debian-mentors" last month[3]. In this case
> there's even an additional detail: the copyrighted files specifically
> uses the "MIT" name for the license. Using a different name under
> "debian/copyright" would be an inconsistency.

According to the copyright format specification[2]:

| There are many versions[3] of the MIT license. Please use Expat[4] instead,
| when it matches.

[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Various_versions
[4] http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature