Bug#985035: ITP: pydata-sphinx-theme -- Bootstrap-based Sphinx theme from the PyData community
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org Owner: Sandro Tosi * Package name: pydata-sphinx-theme Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Joris Van den Bossche * URL : https://github.com/pydata/pydata-sphinx-theme * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : bootstrap-based Sphinx theme from the PyData community Binary package names: python3-pydata-sphinx-theme originally developed for the pandas docs, work is being done to make this more generic and more easily extensible to suit the needs of the different projects; noteworthy project using this theme: . * Pandas: https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/ * NumPy: https://numpy.org/devdocs/ * Bokeh: https://docs.bokeh.org/en/dev/ * JupyterHub and Binder: https://docs.mybinder.org/, http://z2jh.jupyter.org/en/latest/, https://repo2docker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, https://jupyterhub-team-compass.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ * Jupyter Book beta version uses an extension of this theme: https://beta.jupyterbook.org * Fairlearn: https://fairlearn.github.io/master/quickstart.html
Bug#985001: ITP: ipytree -- a tree widget using Jupyter-widget protocol and jsTree
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Arias X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name : ipytree Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Martin Renou * URL : https://github.com/QuantStack/ipytree * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : a Tree Widget using Jupyter-widgets protocol and jsTree Widget that allow create trees for visualization on Jupyter. This package use Jupyter-widgets protocol and jsTree. . This package is need to fix #979625. . This package will be maintained as part of the Debian Python modules team. Cheers, Emmanuel
Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]
On 2021-02-24 at 18:53:19 +0100, Lorenz Schori wrote: > > Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some > > improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is > > viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that > > upstream changed to proxmoxer/proxmoxer. > > Would it help if I open merge requests for that (one against > pristine-tar, one against upstream and one against debian/master for > changelog etc.). Yes, please, a merge request would help: I've looked into it a few times already and wasn't able to finish it in the time I had. But since it's going into experimental, wouldn't it be better to package the latest released version (1.1.1), or possibly even 1.2.0b1 (the very latest version on pypi)? -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' signature.asc Description: PGP signature
