Bug#671115: [debian-mysql] Bug#671115: Bug#671115: transition: mysql-5.5
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote: You will also need to fold /etc/mysql/my.cnf into libmysqlclient16 as the library needs that file for default settings, and then you need to make it conflict with mysql-commont = 5.5 so as to not pick up the broken config options. What (new) (client) options are problematic for libmysqlclient? I thought it was only an issue for server. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGVGHmvSqmbK_i5m1-od4Paj2p501QCRS2pjE_Qu1=_a3gn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#671115: [debian-mysql] Bug#671115: Bug#671115: transition: mysql-5.5
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 18:04:17 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: You will also need to fold /etc/mysql/my.cnf into libmysqlclient16 as the library needs that file for default settings, and then you need to make it conflict with mysql-commont = 5.5 so as to not pick up the broken config options. Sigh. This is so hopelessly broken. (Don't do that.) Also, broken how? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120522074226.gb25...@coloquinte.cristau.org
Re: installer location on mirrors
On 05/21/2012 11:22 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian. non-free is not part of the official debian, yet we have non-free archive areas, so that's not an argument. some derivatives are building d-i images with firmware udebs from non-free included. debian should provide this on the archive level too (read: non-free udeb Packages/Sources indicies), regardless if the official debian images are using it yet or ever. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbb41da.4080...@progress-technologies.net
php5 stable release update
Hi, I was going through bugs in php5 and I have prepared fix for a bugs, none of them are truly critical, but the patches are small, pulled from upstream and they fix the problems our users are experiencing. php5 (5.3.3-7+squeeze11) squeeze; urgency=low * Pass flags to mysqli_real_connect (Closes: #628509) * Fix crash when accessing MONEY type from php5-sybase (Closes: #620948) * Fix iterating over a dateperiod twice (Closes: #658092) * Fix bug where $this become non-object (Closes: #617233) * Fix var_export array with negative key (Closes: #617233) -- Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org Tue, 22 May 2012 09:59:59 +0200 Here is the diffstat: changelog| 11 + patches/fix-iteration-over-a-dateperiod-twice.patch | 179 +++ patches/fix-passing-mysqli-options.patch | 14 + patches/fix-this-become-non-object.patch | 63 ++ patches/fix-var_export-array-with-negative-key.patch | 28 ++ patches/php5-sybase-money-fix.patch | 13 + patches/series |5 7 files changed, 313 insertions(+) Here are the individual diffs for each fix: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=170f072f21d237123b106b3425f33bf58cecf7f1 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=86aaef366e8f808620a85e49b09d344c624a1913 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=5b3cafbacfdc14bf43ca35ec58c327fadd95d77e http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=85700b00ed80807f0badc09fff8da50daa08e7ed http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=30a2878659e7ef6e8e3bc001297bb86d8e70abfc Please consider allowing this -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG-g=grwarv8kndbdnjkawlhait8mm8ujkjeveriz5k...@mail.gmail.com
Re: installer location on mirrors
Heya, On Montag, 21. Mai 2012, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian. /me likes http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/ even though I know it's not Debian ;-) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205221044.20962.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: installer location on mirrors
On 05/22/2012 10:44 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: /me likes http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/ even though I know it's not Debian ;-) right, but these images do not use non-free udebs, they just contain non-free debs in pool/ on the medium. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbb6683.80...@progress-technologies.net
Re: installer location on mirrors
On 12854 March 1977, Daniel Baumann wrote: Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian. non-free is not part of the official debian, yet we have non-free archive areas, so that's not an argument. some derivatives are building d-i images with firmware udebs from non-free included. debian should provide this on the archive level too (read: non-free udeb Packages/Sources indicies), regardless if the official debian images are using it yet or ever. On 12854 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote: On Montag, 21. Mai 2012, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian. /me likes http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/even though I know it's not Debian ;-) And both of you just miss the point. We are NOT talking about udebs. We are NOT talking about whatever debian-cd creates. We are talking about the installer images. Those that fall out of the debian-installer source. And create the files you can find on any mirror in $suite/main/installer-* and which we never had in contrib or non-free. But the link to debian-cd created images answers the question in a different way: It won't have installer images in contrib/non-free. The only non-free stuff we would be likely to add - is added by debian-cd in an extra set of cd images. -- bye, Joerg Trying is the first step towards failure. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87likkfpxb@gkar.ganneff.de
clementine: about boost1.49 transition
Hello, I have been notified that Clementine takes part of the boost1.49 transition.[1] I have some bugs fixes which are pending for an upload and one of them is an rc bug. So I would like to ask you which time I need to plan before I can do a new upload for Clementine? Maybe that this is already possible? Thanks in advance, Best regards, Thomas Pierson [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clementine.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbb804c.6090...@thomaspierson.fr
Re: Comments regarding automake1.12_1.12-1_amd64.changes
Also adding debian-release mailing list in the loop. 2012/5/22 Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org: Hi, I fear your automake 1.12 upload won't end up in unstable so soon. As you know, Release Team is planning to freeze Wheezy within June, and uploading a new major version of automake now could lead to more RC bugs, forcing the delay of the freeze or the release date. I blocked the upload for now pending a OK from the Release Team first, you should get in touch with them to see whether it's OK to have the new automake in unstable. Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadk7b0oo4shw1x6raxzumbngso8fqhreaygv0pjk7nl-qog...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#650601: Re: Bug#650601: transition: libpng 1.5
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 15:33:07 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:48:55PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: I am working with Anibal about package which supports libpng12 and 15 both. This already upload to experimental. Hello, Please review libpng/1.5.10-3 in experimental. I've built lots of packages to test a smooth transition to libpng 1.5 using libpng/1.5.10-3 on my ia64 machine. Upstream is very responsive and both Nobuhiro and myself will help package maintainers with this transition. I will take a look post wheezy. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120522122702.gd25...@coloquinte.cristau.org
Re: clementine: about boost1.49 transition
Thomas Pierson cont...@thomaspierson.fr (22/05/2012): I have been notified that Clementine takes part of the boost1.49 transition.[1] I have some bugs fixes which are pending for an upload and one of them is an rc bug. So I would like to ask you which time I need to plan before I can do a new upload for Clementine? Maybe that this is already possible? The boost transition is a bit special; the bottom line is: don't worry about it, upload your package as you see fit. Thanks for checking with us anyway. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: installer location on mirrors
On 05/22/2012 12:52 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote: And both of you just miss the point. i don't think so (for my part, that is). We are NOT talking about udebs. We are NOT talking about whatever debian-cd creates. We are talking about the installer images. Those that fall out of the debian-installer source. exactely, which, as i said, have non-free parts included in some derivatives. e.g.: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz (for system where the nic needs firmware, the netboot initrd already needs to contain it in order to work). But the link to debian-cd created images answers the question in a different way: It won't have installer images in contrib/non-free. The only non-free stuff we would be likely to add - is added by debian-cd in an extra set of cd images. for derivatives that choose to support users with d-i+non-free-udebs images, they can today store them in dists/$codename/non-free/installer-$arch/[...]. with your proposal, it's effectively impossible for derivatives to store their d-i+non-free-udebs images in a reasonable location within the archive. therefore my request to account for non-free within the archive for the new installer images location *eventhough* official debian does not yet or ever use it. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbb84e2.1070...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Comments regarding automake1.12_1.12-1_amd64.changes
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (22/05/2012): Also adding debian-release mailing list in the loop. Thanks, Luca. 2012/5/22 Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org: I fear your automake 1.12 upload won't end up in unstable so soon. As you know, Release Team is planning to freeze Wheezy within June, and uploading a new major version of automake now could lead to more RC bugs, forcing the delay of the freeze or the release date. I blocked the upload for now pending a OK from the Release Team first, you should get in touch with them to see whether it's OK to have the new automake in unstable. Hello Eric, we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the moment, with extra fun thanks to an uncoordinated switch to gcc 4.7, and its extra hundreds of RC bugs; so it would be nice if we could wait until this big mess is sorted out before considering an additional switch to a new automake version. Ideally, an archive-wide rebuild would make it possible to see how many new FTBFS would pop up, and see if that can be handled. I hope that sheds some light on the current situation… Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: The curious case of openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb in d7.01alpha
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Peter Palfrader wrote: However, I notice your download rate is quite small, so I wouldn't rule out varnish or something else killing your connection if it takes a long time. That resuming a download does not work might also be a concern that warrants further investigation. With help from our friendly DSA member from varnish we are now running a newer version of varnish, the caching proxy. Download resumes work now, so you should be able to fetch things successfully. Connections that take longer than 10 minutes to download things will still get cut off, but since we now support resumes that's less of an issue. This will be fixed properly once a newer varnish version makes it into squeeze-backports. Thanks, weasel -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120522123648.gj3...@anguilla.noreply.org
Bug#674017: nmu: sope_1.3.14-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu sope_1.3.14-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in sid. libsope1 has a dependency on libc6 (= 2.14) that does not exist in Debian. Rebuilding in sid/amd64 works fine and sanitizes the dependencies. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120522142507.27410.61303.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
Bug#674017: marked as done (nmu: sope_1.3.14-1)
Your message dated Tue, 22 May 2012 16:45:37 +0200 with message-id 20120522144537.gf28...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#674017: nmu: sope_1.3.14-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #674017, regarding nmu: sope_1.3.14-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 674017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu sope_1.3.14-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in sid. libsope1 has a dependency on libc6 (= 2.14) that does not exist in Debian. Rebuilding in sid/amd64 works fine and sanitizes the dependencies. Andreas ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (22/05/2012): Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu sope_1.3.14-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in sid. libsope1 has a dependency on libc6 (= 2.14) that does not exist in Debian. Rebuilding in sid/amd64 works fine and sanitizes the dependencies. done, thanks Andreas. Cc-ing sope maintainers for their information. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#671115: [debian-mysql] Bug#671115: transition: mysql-5.5
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:34:16 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: For anything critical like the PHP update, would it be prudent to upload a new one with the build dependency bumped back to libmysqlclient16-dev so they can progress to testing independent of this transition? There's no such thing as libmysqlclient16-dev btw. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120522180655.gm31...@radis.cristau.org
Processed: block 645105 with 672152 673594
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 645105 with 672152 673594 Bug #645105 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal 645105 was blocked by: 673165 648628 673567 631019 669468 645105 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 645105: 672152 and 673594 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 645105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133771399429575.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#671115: next attempt
The attached file is my latest proposed fix for mysql-5.5. For clarity it excludes files added (repacking stuff) or removed ( a non-DFSG file and lintian overrides). I am still testing it in other ways. diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude '*.lintian-overrides' mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/changelog mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/changelog --- mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/changelog 2012-05-08 05:59:19.0 +0100 +++ mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-05-21 22:21:04.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +mysql-5.5 (5.5.23+dfsg-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Revert having libssl-dev as a build dependency and changed +WITH_SSL option to 'bundled' from 'yes' (Closes: #590905) +and (Closes: #673865) + * Standardized debian/watch and get-orig-source and made DFSG exclusion +of Docs/mysql.info explicit (Closes: #673528) + * Located and installed upstream changelog + + -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Fri, 18 May 2012 17:36:37 +0100 + mysql-5.5 (5.5.23-2) unstable; urgency=low * Stopped overriding the -j build parameter (Closes: #512964) diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude '*.lintian-overrides' mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/control mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/control --- mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/control 2012-05-07 19:33:17.0 +0100 +++ mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/control2012-05-21 21:45:03.0 +0100 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian MySQL Maintainers pkg-mysql-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Norbert Tretkowski norb...@tretkowski.de, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.1.3~), libaio-dev[linux-any], libncurses5-dev (= 5.0-6), perl, libwrap0-dev (= 7.6-8.3), libreadline-dev, po-debconf, psmisc, chrpath, doxygen-latex, ghostscript, gawk, bison, lsb-release, hardening-wrapper, cmake, libssl-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.1.3~), libaio-dev[linux-any], libncurses5-dev (= 5.0-6), perl, libwrap0-dev (= 7.6-8.3), libreadline-dev, po-debconf, psmisc, chrpath, doxygen-latex, ghostscript, gawk, bison, lsb-release, hardening-wrapper, cmake Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Homepage: http://dev.mysql.com/ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mysql/mysql-5.5/ diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude '*.lintian-overrides' mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/copyright mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/copyright --- mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/copyright 2012-04-17 07:32:05.0 +0100 +++ mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/copyright 2012-05-20 14:37:08.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,11 @@ Upstream-Name: MySQL 5.5 Upstream-Contact: http://bugs.mysql.com/ Source: http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.5.html -Comments: originally produced by a modified version of licensecheck2dep5 +Comments: + The file Docs/mysql.info is removed from the upstream source + because it is incompatible with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. + . + Originally produced by a modified version of licensecheck2dep5 from CDBS by Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com. Hand modified to reduce redundancy in the output and add appropriate license text. . @@ -146,6 +150,7 @@ support-files/mysqld_multi.server.sh support-files/mysql-log-rotate.sh support-files/mysql.server-sys5.sh + Docs/* Copyright: UNKNOWN Comment: These files fall under the blanket license specified in the file COPYING and README diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude '*.lintian-overrides' mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/patches/94_spelling.patch mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/patches/94_spelling.patch --- mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/patches/94_spelling.patch 2012-05-03 17:53:24.0 +0100 +++ mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/patches/94_spelling.patch 2012-05-20 14:06:35.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Author nicho...@periapt.co.uk Subject: spelling errors Preceeding - preceding -Last-Update: 2012-05-02 +Last-Update: 2012-05-20 Forwarded: no --- a/libmysql/errmsg.c +++ b/libmysql/errmsg.c @@ -14,17 +14,6 @@ The number of columns in the result set differs from the number of bound buffers. You must reset the statement, rebind the result set columns, and execute the statement again, This handle is already connected. Use a separate handle for each connection., Authentication plugin '%s' cannot be loaded: %s, a/Docs/mysql.info -+++ b/Docs/mysql.info -@@ -233132,7 +233132,7 @@ - -* Error: `2056' (`CR_STMT_CLOSED') - -- Message: Statement closed indirectly because of a preceeding %s() -+ Message: Statement closed indirectly because of a preceding %s() - call - -* Error: `2057' (`CR_NEW_STMT_METADATA') --- a/mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_ddl.test +++ b/mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_ddl.test @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude '*.lintian-overrides' mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/rules mysql-5.5-5.5.23+dfsg/debian/rules --- mysql-5.5-5.5.23/debian/rules 2012-05-05
Re: Comments regarding automake1.12_1.12-1_amd64.changes
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the moment, with extra fun thanks to an uncoordinated switch to gcc 4.7, and its extra hundreds of RC bugs; so it would be nice if we could wait until this big mess is sorted out before considering an additional switch to a new automake version. Ideally, an archive-wide rebuild would make it possible to see how many new FTBFS would pop up, and see if that can be handled. If we do an archive-wide rebuild to test the new Automake, it would be excellent if we could also test make 3.82 at the same time. It's currently in experimental, and we suspect that it may break some packages that use a deprecated rule construct, but we have no idea how many packages might break. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zk8zc4b5@windlord.stanford.edu
GCC 4.7
Quoting Luca Falavigna: we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the moment, with extra fun thanks to an uncoordinated switch to gcc 4.7, and its extra hundreds of RC bugs; http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00632.html Why don't you just revert the default gcc change until after the freeze? -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Comments regarding automake1.12_1.12-1_amd64.changes
* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) wrote: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (22/05/2012): Also adding debian-release mailing list in the loop. Thanks, Luca. 2012/5/22 Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org: I fear your automake 1.12 upload won't end up in unstable so soon. As you know, Release Team is planning to freeze Wheezy within June, and uploading a new major version of automake now could lead to more RC bugs, forcing the delay of the freeze or the release date. I blocked the upload for now pending a OK from the Release Team first, you should get in touch with them to see whether it's OK to have the new automake in unstable. Hello Eric, we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the moment, with extra fun thanks to an uncoordinated switch to gcc 4.7, and its extra hundreds of RC bugs; so it would be nice if we could wait until this big mess is sorted out before considering an additional switch to a new automake version. Ideally, an archive-wide rebuild would make it possible to see how many new FTBFS would pop up, and see if that can be handled. How would one go about getting a archive-wide rebuild to test this? I hope that sheds some light on the current situation… Sure, thanks for the details. It would be nice to get automake 1.12 into the release but it wouldn't be the end of the world. I'm actually more worried about getting ride of automake1.7 for this release (http://bugs.debian.org/648591, since I have your attention). I'll still be able to upload new versions of automake 1.11 if this upload is rejected right? Mraw, KiBi. -- Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
