Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 08:01:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 19:31:40 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: Can I do the upload to t-p-u (via a sponsor)? Go ahead. Uploaded. Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121202092204.ga10...@ugent.be
Bug#694913: unblock: im-config/0.19
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package im-config Applications started by dbus do not get proper keyboard input for CJK locales as reported in http://bugs.debian.org/694446. The proper functioning input capability with input method is essential for CJK environment and this must be fixed before the release. In order to fix this problem, setting of environment variables must be set before dbus by moving its code execution from im-launch to 70im-config_launch and daemons needs to be started after dbus via im-launch as in 0.18. This new split behavior is realized by changing all pre-set configuration files as the following: * set environment variables if $IM_CONFIG_PHASE=1 * start daemon programs if $IM_CONFIG_PHASE=2 70im-config_launch and im-launch are changed to use this new feature. The debdiff against the package in testing is attached. unblock im-config/0.19 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.6-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru im-config-0.18/70im-config_launch im-config-0.19/70im-config_launch --- im-config-0.18/70im-config_launch 2012-08-11 15:55:23.0 +0900 +++ im-config-0.19/70im-config_launch 2012-11-29 00:12:41.0 +0900 @@ -11,6 +11,32 @@ IMLAUNCH=/usr/bin/im-launch +# If already tweaked, keep hands off :-) +# If im-config is removed but not purged, keep hands off :-) +if [ -z $XMODIFIERS ] \ + [ -z $GTK_IM_MODULE ] \ + [ -z $QT_IM_MODULE ] \ + [ -z $QT4_IM_MODULE ] \ + [ -z $CLUTTER_IM_MODULE ] \ + [ -r /usr/share/im-config/xinputrc.common ]; then +IM_CONFIG_PHASE=1 +export IM_CONFIG_PHASE +# initialize all im-config common functions and parameters +. /usr/share/im-config/xinputrc.common +# source the first found configuration file +if [ -r $IM_CONFIG_XINPUTRC_USR ]; then +. $IM_CONFIG_XINPUTRC_USR +elif [ -r $IM_CONFIG_XINPUTRC_SYS ]; then +. $IM_CONFIG_XINPUTRC_SYS +fi +# always export variables even for manual configuration. +export XMODIFIERS +export GTK_IM_MODULE +export QT_IM_MODULE +export QT4_IM_MODULE +export CLUTTER_IM_MODULE +fi + # Change $STARTUP string to im-launch while keeping the old $STARTUP string # as its arguments if [ -x $IMLAUNCH ]; then diff -Nru im-config-0.18/data/20_ibus.rc im-config-0.19/data/20_ibus.rc --- im-config-0.18/data/20_ibus.rc 2011-12-10 22:41:37.0 +0900 +++ im-config-0.19/data/20_ibus.rc 2012-11-28 23:22:48.0 +0900 @@ -1,9 +1,12 @@ # start IBus # vim: set sts=4 expandtab: +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 2 ]; then # start IBus daemon /usr/bin/ibus-daemon --daemonize --xim +fi +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 1 ]; then # set variables for the plain XIM XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus @@ -49,4 +52,4 @@ break fi done - +fi diff -Nru im-config-0.18/data/22_fcitx.rc im-config-0.19/data/22_fcitx.rc --- im-config-0.18/data/22_fcitx.rc 2011-12-10 22:41:32.0 +0900 +++ im-config-0.19/data/22_fcitx.rc 2012-11-28 23:22:48.0 +0900 @@ -1,9 +1,12 @@ # start fcitx # vim: set sts=4 expandtab: +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 2 ]; then # start fcitx daemon /usr/bin/fcitx +fi +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 1 ]; then # set variables for the plain XIM XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx @@ -50,4 +53,4 @@ break fi done - +fi diff -Nru im-config-0.18/data/24_uim.rc im-config-0.19/data/24_uim.rc --- im-config-0.18/data/24_uim.rc 2012-08-25 11:07:35.0 +0900 +++ im-config-0.19/data/24_uim.rc 2012-11-28 23:22:48.0 +0900 @@ -1,9 +1,12 @@ # start uim # vim: set sts=4 expandtab: +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 2 ]; then # start uim-xim daemon /usr/bin/uim-xim +fi +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 1 ]; then # set variables for the plain XIM XMODIFIERS=@im=uim @@ -66,4 +69,4 @@ done CLUTTER_IM_MODULE=xim - +fi diff -Nru im-config-0.18/data/25_hime.rc im-config-0.19/data/25_hime.rc --- im-config-0.18/data/25_hime.rc 2012-02-05 20:17:27.0 +0900 +++ im-config-0.19/data/25_hime.rc 2012-11-28 23:22:48.0 +0900 @@ -1,9 +1,12 @@ # start hime # vim: set sts=4 expandtab: +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 2 ]; then # start hime daemon /usr/bin/hime +fi +if [ $IM_CONFIG_PHASE = 1 ]; then # set variables for the plain XIM XMODIFIERS=@im=hime @@ -43,3 +46,4 @@ # hime has no clutter support, and qt3 immodule is not compiled. CLUTTER_IM_MODULE=xim +fi diff -Nru im-config-0.18/data/26_gcin.rc im-config-0.19/data/26_gcin.rc --- im-config-0.18/data/26_gcin.rc 2012-02-05 20:17:27.0 +0900 +++ im-config-0.19/data/26_gcin.rc 2012-11-28 23:22:48.0 +0900 @@ -1,9 +1,12 @@ # start gcin # vim: set sts=4 expandtab: +if [
Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:31:26 +, Alan Woodland wrote: On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote: There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the future in my view. Any progress here? I have prepared an upload, which drops the no longer functional -dkms package and removes the recommends, but I'm still debating the merits of adding a conflicts with the older versions of the -dkms package. It would be nice to have that in ASAP; I don't think a conflict would be needed, but don't mind much either way… Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#693787: Unblock request for dovecot
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 23:04:07 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: +if [ $1 = triggered ]; then +if [ -x /etc/init.d/dovecot ]; then +if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then +invoke-rc.d dovecot start +else +/etc/init.d/dovecot start +fi +fi +fi How can this ever work in postrm? (as far as I know only postinst can be called this way, and anyway starting a daemon in postrm doesn't seem to make much sense) Dovecot starts a number of daemon processes. If e.g. you removed imapd, you might still keep the pop3d, managesieved and so on. postrm is never called with $1 == triggered, so afaict this is dead code. The switch to triggers is not appropriate at this stage IMO anyway, and should be deferred to the next release. I can take it out. Yes please. The hurd fix is probably not something for right now either. Fixing FTBS on hurd was a release goal no? IIRC the bug was high severity but if it is not considered important I can take this out. Yes please. The tcp wrappers change doesn't seem appropriate either. It's only an extra cflag really but I can take it out if necessary. Yes please. Not sure I'm happy about adding hardening this late. This was also a release goal wasn't it? It was, but it also has potentially wide reaching implications. I suppose for a network daemon it kind of makes sense, so maybe leave it in… + chmod 0700 debian/dovecot-core/etc/dovecot/private You seem to run dh_fixperms afterwards, because as far as I can tell the deb has drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-11-14 23:09 ./etc/dovecot/private/ Hmm I thought it was doing the right thing but I can change it if necessary. Well I guess you added the chmod for a reason. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 07:30:16 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: +cairo-dock (3.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~) to Build-Depends. + * Enable hardening. I'd prefer if the above items were left out. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694919: unblock: haskell-dbus/0.10.3-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: jmilli...@gmail.com Please unblock package haskell-dbus The version currently in testing, 0.10, has two bugs which can cause problems for users who run processes with lifetimes longer than the dbus service: - If the connection to the dbus service is lost, the library enters a loop and causes massive unbounded memory consumption. Fixed in the upstream point release 0.10.2. - If connecting to an address fails, the library will leak a file descriptor. When client code attempts reconnection in a loop, this may cause exhaustion of available file descriptors. Fixed in the upstream point release 0.10.3. There are some minor changes in these releases which are unrelated to those bugs. The unrelated changes are trivial updates to dependency version limits in a build metadata file, and do not affect the Debian package. http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-dbus.html unblock haskell-dbus/0.10.3-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal1ky9o2vjw1-wfr8fyxvc7fl+p2woef8e1vpijfbdje71z...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#689425: unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 21:29:30 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These changes are limiting the input and install icons to avoid crashing fcitx main program. Even when known issues in fcitx has already been fixed, it would be good to make fcitx-googlepinyin safer. There's another change in the package which you don't mention here. What is that about? Cheers, Julien I guess you mean the build system related change? It's about changing the configuration format to the up-to-date format used in fcitx 4.2.x branch, the original configuration format is from 4.0.x branch and out-dated. It's a quite easy change as we already have done that for most of other components for quite some time. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w6OJjSq=ogc6b+img14hs5mwxj9ebq4-i3byn7uuma...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#692734: unblock: ettercap/0.7.5-4
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:46:33 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, please unblock package ettercap. A new upstream version 0.7.5 of ettercap (a network sniff/attack tool) fixes a variety of security issues. It does not seem practical to me to backport the fixes, because many of them are made on top of non-security-related changes, and teasing them apart etc would be a great deal of work and also quite error-prone. I think it's too late to get a new upstream, with an entirely rewritten build system, into wheezy. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694859: marked as done (t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:32:32 +0100
with message-id 20121202103232.gg5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694859,
regarding t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to ask pre-approval to upload fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to
testing-proposed-updates. The only change is the removal of 2 non-free files
from the orig tarball. See debdiff below.
The version in unstable is 1.24-1, and the diffstat between testing and
unstable has:
157 files changed, 31399 insertions(+), 23563 deletions(-)
For reference: I uploaded fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to mentors, and will ask for
sponsorship if I get pre-approval.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fossil
BTW is it correct to file this as an unblock request? Reportbug knows about
requests for stable-proposed-updates, but not for t-p-u.
Thanks,
Ivo
diff -Nru fossil-1.22.1/debian/changelog fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- fossil-1.22.1/debian/changelog 2012-03-29 10:47:49.0 +0200
+++ fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 13:06:52.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+fossil (1:1.22.1+dfsg-0.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload with maintainer approval.
+ * Upload to testing for wheezy.
+ * Remove non-free src/cson_amalgamation.{c,h} from upstream tarball
+(closes: #692623, #692624).
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:44:37 +0100
+
fossil (1:1.22.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -Nru fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.c
fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.c
--- fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.c 2012-03-17 19:30:58.0
+0100
+++ fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.c 2012-12-01 12:43:54.0
+0100
@@ -1,5641 +0,0 @@
-#ifdef FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON
contents of non-free file stripped from diff
-#endif /* FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON */
diff -Nru fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.h
fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.h
--- fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.h 2012-03-17 19:30:58.0
+0100
+++ fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.h 2012-12-01 12:43:54.0
+0100
@@ -1,2506 +0,0 @@
-#ifdef FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON
contents of non-free file stripped from diff
-#endif /* FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON */
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:22:04 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 08:01:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 19:31:40 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Can I do the upload to t-p-u (via a sponsor)?
Go ahead.
Uploaded.
Approve hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
Bug#687617: [pre-approval] unblock: openarena with really auto-download? prompt
On 01/12/12 11:40, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they would prefer an are you sure? prompt when auto-downloading was enabled. Is the rest of the user interface generally translated? I might be willing to accept this patch, but not if it means regressing l10n. No, there's no l10n (or i18n for that matter). I'm not even sure whether the engine supports text outside US-ASCII :-( S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bb30d7.3020...@debian.org
Bug#687617: [pre-approval] unblock: openarena with really auto-download? prompt
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:43:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote: On 01/12/12 11:40, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they would prefer an are you sure? prompt when auto-downloading was enabled. Is the rest of the user interface generally translated? I might be willing to accept this patch, but not if it means regressing l10n. No, there's no l10n (or i18n for that matter). I'm not even sure whether the engine supports text outside US-ASCII :-( In that case no objection. Let us know when this has spent a while in sid. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#691639: marked as done (unblock: lxde-metapackages/4)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:52:29 +0100
with message-id 20121202115229.gj5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#691639: unblock: lxde-metapackages/4
has caused the Debian Bug report #691639,
regarding unblock: lxde-metapackages/4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
691639: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
please unblock package lxde-metapackages.
The new version of this package has some useful changes in dependencies: it has
switched from overbloated gdm3 to lightdm, got back a somewhat lost network-
manager-gnome and added galculator (closes: #659577).
IMHO, there's nothing radical there, but it should improve Wheezy user
experience.
debdiff is attached.
unblock lxde-metapackages/4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/changelog lxde-metapackages-4/debian/changelog
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/changelog 2012-05-18 11:08:23.0 +0300
+++ lxde-metapackages-4/debian/changelog 2012-08-10 23:40:36.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+lxde-metapackages (4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Switching from gdm3 to lightdm.
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:40:30 +0200
+
+lxde-metapackages (3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Adding galculator to lxde depends (Closes: #659577).
+ * Readding back network-manager-gnome which apparently got lost at
+some point.
+ * Updating GPL blurb in copyright file.
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:23:15 +0200
+
lxde-metapackages (2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andrew Lee (李健秋) ]
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/control lxde-metapackages-4/debian/control
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/control 2012-05-11 08:14:34.0 +0300
+++ lxde-metapackages-4/debian/control 2012-08-10 23:40:21.0 +0300
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@
Package: lxde
Architecture: all
Depends:
- ${misc:Depends}, gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance,
+ ${misc:Depends}, galculator, gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance,
lxde-core, lxde-icon-theme, lxinput,
lxrandr, lxsession-edit, lxshortcut, lxterminal, obconf, xarchiver
Recommends:
- iceweasel | www-browser, gdm3 | x-display-manager, lxmusic, menu-xdg,
- lxpolkit, xserver-xorg
+ iceweasel | www-browser, lightdm | x-display-manager, lxmusic, menu-xdg,
+ network-manager-gnome, lxpolkit, xserver-xorg
Suggests: lxlauncher, lxtask
Description: LXDE metapackage
LXDE (the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment) is a project aimed
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/copyright lxde-metapackages-4/debian/copyright
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/copyright 2012-04-28 13:05:22.0 +0300
+++ lxde-metapackages-4/debian/copyright 2012-08-10 23:40:21.0 +0300
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
License: GPL-2+
License: GPL-2+
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
- of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
@@ -19,8 +19,7 @@
GNU General Public License for more details.
.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
+ along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
.
The complete text of the GNU General Public License
can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 file.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 23:56:28 +0300, Bob Bib wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
please unblock package lxde-metapackages.
I've unblocked 4+nmu1.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End
Bug#694327: marked as done (unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:53:05 +0100
with message-id 20121202115305.gk5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694327: unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694327,
regarding unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package javamorph
It fixes a RC bug: #692147 Cannot find the java binary
debdiff:
diff -u javamorph-0.0.20100201/help/javamorph
javamorph-0.0.20100201/help/javamorph
--- javamorph-0.0.20100201/help/javamorph
+++ javamorph-0.0.20100201/help/javamorph
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
# Pass DEBIAN specific help file locations to the JVM.
OPTS=-DHELPDIR=${HELPDIR} -DHELPFILE=${HELPFILE}
# Location of the OPENJDK JVM.
-J_OPEN=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java
+J_OPEN=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-*/jre/bin/java
# Location of the GCJ JVM.
J_GCJ=/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/bin/java
# Choose the JVM if installed.
diff -u javamorph-0.0.20100201/debian/changelog
javamorph-0.0.20100201/debian/changelog
--- javamorph-0.0.20100201/debian/changelog
+++ javamorph-0.0.20100201/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+javamorph (0.0.20100201-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Support arch-specific openjdk paths in javamorph script (closes: #692147).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:34:01 +
+
javamorph (0.0.20100201-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
unblock javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 15:34:13 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package javamorph
It fixes a RC bug: #692147 Cannot find the java binary
Unblocked -1.3.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
Bug#694656: marked as done (unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:54:46 +0100
with message-id 20121202115446.gl5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694656: unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
has caused the Debian Bug report #694656,
regarding unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package update-notifier
This release fixes release critical and important bugs. The diff
included below comes from the VCS, the generated tarballs have
additional differences introduced by differences in the
autotools versions used to create them.
There is a typo in the changelog, in case you wonder about
update-notifier-cleanup, it should read update-notifier-common.
unblock update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
-- Diff from bzr:
=== modified file 'debian/changelog'
--- debian/changelog2011-08-02 16:20:19 +
+++ debian/changelog2012-11-28 16:49:05 +
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+update-notifier (0.99.3debian11) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Make update-notifier-common depend on lsb-release (Closes: #694006)
+ * Remove /var/lib/update-notifier if update-notifier-cleanup is purged
+(Closes: #606623)
+ * Let update-notifier-common depend on gettext-base (Closes: #620509)
+
+ -- Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:01 +0100
+
update-notifier (0.99.3debian10) unstable; urgency=low
[ Martin Pitt ]
=== modified file 'debian/control'
--- debian/control 2011-08-02 16:17:43 +
+++ debian/control 2012-11-28 16:47:16 +
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ Replaces: update-notifier ( 0.75.1)
Architecture: all
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends},
+ gettext-base,
+ lsb-release,
python,
python-apt (= 0.6.12)
Recommends: libpam-modules (= 1.0.1-9ubuntu3)
=== added file 'debian/update-notifier-common.postrm'
--- debian/update-notifier-common.postrm1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/update-notifier-common.postrm2010-12-14 17:11:52 +
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+if [ $1 = purge -a -d /var/lib/update-notifier ]; then
+ rm -r --one-file-system /var/lib/update-notifier
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500,
'stable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
pgpjZlLf9aq2b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 19:07:32 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package update-notifier
This release fixes release critical and important bugs. The diff
included below comes from the VCS, the generated tarballs have
additional differences introduced by differences in the
autotools versions used to create them.
That additional noise is slightly annoying...
[...]
=== added file 'debian/update-notifier-common.postrm'
--- debian/update-notifier-common.postrm 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/update-notifier-common.postrm 2010-12-14 17:11:52 +
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+if [ $1 = purge -a -d /var/lib/update-notifier ]; then
+ rm -r --one-file-system /var/lib/update-notifier
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
Not sure you want the purge to fail if for whatever reason rm returns
non-zero, so I'd add a || : just in case. Unblocked for now though.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
Bug#690458: marked as done (RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:10:40 +0100 with message-id 20121202121040.gm5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing has caused the Debian Bug report #690458, regarding RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from testing only. Ben. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:47:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:31:26 +, Alan Woodland wrote: On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote: There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the future in my view. Any progress here? I have prepared an upload, which drops the no longer functional -dkms package and removes the recommends, but I'm still debating the merits of adding a conflicts with the older versions of the -dkms package. It would be nice to have that in ASAP; I don't think a conflict would be needed, but don't mind much either way… Thanks for the 0.8.4-3 upload. Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#694490: release.debian.org: unblock: aephea/10.008-2
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
--- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
Package: aephea
Architecture: all
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Breaks: zoem-doc
+Replaces: zoem-doc
Recommends: zoem
Description: text-based authoring tool for HTML
Aephea is an HTML authoring framework. It enforces HTML well-formedness
Does that actually work? I'm not sure what Breaks without a version
even means...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen
Dear release-team, please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs #617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen). Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be fixed, but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploads now to correctly close those bugs. Thanks, Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJmTE1TYc=z76MP-Ma0s2Y9pY-XZm=_OQDXdTNDE6=x...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#694935: unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock openbox. The version in unstable contains a minor change fixing an RC bug which causes installations/upgrades to fail (#694396). unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6 Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0 For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpbMAXzzPHoa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#694935: marked as done (unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:11:10 +0100 with message-id 20121202141110.go5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#694935: unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #694935, regarding unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock openbox. The version in unstable contains a minor change fixing an RC bug which causes installations/upgrades to fail (#694396). unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6 Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0 For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgp7l9NaDEGNP.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 13:52:27 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock openbox. The version in unstable contains a minor change fixing an RC bug which causes installations/upgrades to fail (#694396). It's already unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#680076: marked as done (unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:25:58 +0100 with message-id 20121202142558.gf5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org and subject line Re: Bug#680076: unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #680076, regarding unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680076: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680076 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fonts-sil-padauk This package provides a fonts udeb. There should be few impact on D-I as the package is in the graphical installer images and the update will just provide a more complete font for Burmese script. Still, I guess that Cyril has his word to say about this, just to not interfere with the release of D-I. unblock fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): Filtering both debian-src and the test suite changes from the diff still leaves us with 88 files changed, 38012 insertions(+), 36479 deletions(-) Some of that appears to be files being renamed or syntax changing slightly, and a bunch of quote character changes, which make things much noisier than the real changes. :-( I tried to have a look this afternoon but these changes definitely seem too large. So, I'm afraid we can only close this freeze exception request which leaves us with the 2.2 version of the fonts in whezy. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
RM: bcrypt/1.1-6
Package: bcrypt Version: 1.1-8 Previously a request was submitted to have bcrypt removed from testing (#694093). Work has since been completed by DD Michael Stapelberg to address the two RC bugs that were the motivation behind removal. I would therefore request that the bcrypt package be included in testing again by accepting recently uploaded version 1.1-8. Only minimal changes were made to the package to explicitly address the RC bug issues. Thanks, Kevin RC Bugs addressed in the patch found in version 1.1-8: * bugs.debian.org/693460 Can't handle files larger than 4GB, causes data loss if used with default parameters. * bugs.debian.org/694091 Loads the whole file into memory, causes processes deaths when trying to allocate more memory than the machine has. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 2048R/C85D8F71 http://rustybear.com/publickey.html
Re: Bug#689154: unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Julien, Thank you for your answer. Does it mean I should prepare a new version with the following changes : Le 25/11/2012 20:17, Julien Cristau a écrit : + * Revert the use dh_installdocs --link-doc (Closes: #687875, #687881, +#687883). Are the AUTHORS/README changes in various debian/*.docs files related? (yes, they are needed since they are not symlinked anymore.) + * gnunet-server.postinst: check the existence of a binary before changing its +permissions (Closes: #688484). + + [ David Pr??vot ] + * debian/po/fr.po: Fix charset, and use non-breaking spaces. I realize #688486 [1] is not a RC bug but it seems harmless [2] and would fix the build of the package on kfreebsd. But I won't add it to the changes list if you don't confirm it is harmless. Last thing: gnunet-0.9.3-4 was uploaded to unstable with fixes for a lot of not-RC bugs. So I guess I need to prepare a new version targeting testing-proposed-updates ? Cheers, Bertrand [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688486 [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/gnunet.git;a=commitdiff;h=3146f13e0b136b2ca317940bc18deb932f3b339a -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQu5YpAAoJEKBKs7rb4mPu32QQAJFbouzZGGs+jokj1kWCg1PK 0lvcPt6HQaNb23gTcU71ukmlwm4QHYY3UfEtAjkmbPUrbbgfjiHV1kIQzOlv0Oar vKpFUsmg/G7C139SM/mxDrj2pWA+CN6R3u+6PaQH20aBXjUoevqZKi7zJ+2/Xebh 1oVgotnhNlLuLnMJWlg5tCE+aEV7ZowVzjRhvv5PC9ryWVsormVNeDKuD1bcfhnE OO5FNc3l1+7OHwKfWsysnbuaXeDHx6PZ+4vaGbSsChpfRUeAFMlEPfNfswgzeUhk qPDmm0wnADbvmIR5XlQfiItaDEl+jThcJfITsi7QopRUymg7Weyw9mlrW+CJxKNe 30bazZzrpkwo8ewIOMmOZhh+pScVvIw8jGDDyEkeH6LW1Mx8P0REgZdvu0rlKPDl 391lZD+pnwPVEl7bq3HJD10GaUijBsH9quHO/+ofw4+1oy+9F2BdskQkrMU46VW5 ow7C7h/Kz4JS4gW95aWrWjC6kbKX68Eouoh86/F05R0EaGop+k1xlb3q493Ye1CY stUEBIlyROfe3u3dKeDGMkLgHuAFRHRZHdMw5XBrVMwW4Kh6LkpBJCkX1EyIC3zi PdKrg69ZSRz2/u8ajf8O60gLyrELaJN74cNYSy474RVYNFODOm0diaXYZlKeaZl5 sAAWV0vsf92N8PAWEHGj =E03x -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bb962c.7040...@gmail.com
lockfile-progs 0.1.17 might be candidate for wheezy
Please feel free to ignore this, but there were a few bugfixes in
lockfile-progs 0.1.17 (just uploaded to sid) that I thought might make
it appropriate for consideration for wheezy:
1) No longer (unintentionally) includes .git* in the source package.
2) Fixes cross-build problem. (Closes: #694842)
3) No longer documents -p, but then ignores it. (Closes: #686057)
The latter fix means that -p (--use-pid) will actually work.
Previously, the lockfile-progs would just accept and ignore -p, which
means that you would think that --use-pid was in effect, when it wasn't.
-p, --use-pid
Write the parent process id (PPID) to the lockfile whenever a lock‐
file is created, and use that pid when checking a lock's validity.
See the lockfile_create(3) manpage for more information. This
option applies to lockfile-create and lockfile-check. NOTE: this
option will not work correctly between machines sharing a filesys‐
tem.
Below should be the precise changes (ignoring the removal of .git*) from
0.0.16.
Thanks, and let me know if you'd like any further information.
diff -Nru --exclude .git --exclude .gitignore
lockfile-progs-0.1.16/debian/changelog lockfile-progs-0.1.17/debian/changelog
--- lockfile-progs-0.1.16/debian/changelog 2011-09-25 10:28:48.0
-0500
+++ lockfile-progs-0.1.17/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:17:33.0
-0600
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+lockfile-progs (0.1.17) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add p to getopt_long()'s short options so the -p arg will actually
work.
+As the manpage states, -p was intended to be the short argument for
+--use-pid, but since p wasn't added to the getopt_long()
+optstring, it didn't actually work. Fix it.
+Thanks to Michael Deegan b...@wibble.darktech.org for the report.
+(Closes: #686057)
+
+ * Fix cross-builds; use the cross-compiler when cross-building.
+Thanks to Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com for the report and the
+patch. (Closes: #694842)
+
+ -- Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:16:09 -0600
+
lockfile-progs (0.1.16) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove unused rc variable in chk() to silence gcc warning.
diff -Nru --exclude .git --exclude .gitignore
lockfile-progs-0.1.16/debian/rules lockfile-progs-0.1.17/debian/rules
--- lockfile-progs-0.1.16/debian/rules 2010-06-12 12:40:56.0 -0500
+++ lockfile-progs-0.1.17/debian/rules 2012-12-01 11:58:50.0 -0600
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
-# Copyright 1998 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
+# Copyright 1998-2012 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
# This file is covered under the terms of the Gnu Public License.
+DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
+DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
+
+ifneq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE),$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
+export CC := $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc
+endif
+
export CFLAGS := -DDEBIAN -O2 -g
export LDFLAGS := -g
diff -Nru --exclude .git --exclude .gitignore
lockfile-progs-0.1.16/lockfile-progs.c lockfile-progs-0.1.17/lockfile-progs.c
--- lockfile-progs-0.1.16/lockfile-progs.c 2011-08-21 18:28:53.0
-0500
+++ lockfile-progs-0.1.17/lockfile-progs.c 2012-12-01 11:34:13.0
-0600
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
int usage_error = 0;
int opt_result;
- const char *short_opts = r:olqv;
+ const char *short_opts = r:oplqv;
struct option long_opts[] = {
{ retry, required_argument, NULL, 'r' },
{ oneshot, no_argument, NULL, 'o' },
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8738zowd7a@trouble.defaultvalue.org
Re: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: Dear release-team, please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs #617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen). Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be fixed, but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploads now to correctly close those bugs. Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track your request. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mmmfbka7fbfzkeuhmr06tqwrcorvsqyw3dl6nauorh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Can bug #591969 be ignored for wheezy?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote: Can this bug be tagged wheezy-ignore? From the bug report: Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track this request. Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MO+FhcEWXNypu2Wot7m4+NVkvFoOsoLCnhmKreYMGOe=a...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t. to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades. There are also some (partial) upgrade issues with the 32-bit stuff on amd64 Could you implement those fixes as a minimal tpu? Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpm559snsgudzqulbafl480kstuvuoenefpzaqd5hf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#684732: unblock: nut/2.6.4-2
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:13:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:50:17 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut
versioned 2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. The change
relative to the previous version in unstable (2.6.4-2) is that I
have added a preinst script in nut-client.
For completeness, I attach the debdiff of the new version
(2.6.4-2.1) against the version currently in Wheezy (2.6.4-1).
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/control nut-2.6.4/debian/control
--- nut-2.6.4/debian/control2012-06-06 21:06:03.0
+0200 +++ nut-2.6.4/debian/control 2012-08-12
20:39:01.0 +0200 @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
Package: nut
Architecture: all
+Section: metapackages
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nut-server, nut-client
Description: network UPS tools - metapackage
Network UPS Tools (NUT) is a client/server monitoring system that
@@ -32,7 +33,8 @@
through the server, and are notified whenever the power status
changes.
.
- This package is a metapackage that install both nut-server and
nut-client
+ This package is a metapackage that install both nut-server and
nut-client,
+ in most cases it is sufficient for a basic UPS monitoring system.
s/install/s/
Thanks, fixed in git
[...]
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm ---
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm 2012-06-06
21:06:03.0 +0200 +++ nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm
2012-08-12 20:39:01.0 +0200 @@ -44,3 +44,4 @@
#DEBHELPER#
+exit 0
Why? Changelog doesn't seem to mention it.
If a condition is failing earlier in the script (which can be expected),
it's possible that the script will exit with a != 0 status.
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides ---
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100 +++
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides 2012-08-12
20:39:01.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +nut-client:
script-in-etc-init.d-not-registered-via-update-rc.d
What is that about?
The package is shipping a symlink (ups-monitor - nut-client) which is
used by /etc/init.d/halt to cut the power off the UPS. This symlink
should obviously not be added to any runlevel.
[...]
+# make sure that conffiles are secured and have the correct
ownerships
+if [ -d /etc/nut/ ] ; then
+ chown root:nut /etc/nut/
+fi
+for file in nut.conf upsmon.conf upssched.conf ; do
+if [ -f /etc/nut/$file ] ; then
+chown root:nut /etc/nut/$file
+chmod 640 /etc/nut/$file
+fi
+done
+
I still think the chowns/chmods shouldn't be done on upgrades, if for
whatever reason the local admin changed those that's their choice.
Is this really blocking the transition? The version in squeeze is also
doing this. We could remove this later I guess.
[...]
- # re process nut.conf MODE so that it can be sourced
- NUT_MODE=`grep -e '^ *MODE' /etc/nut/nut.conf | tr -d `
- sed s/^ *MODE.*/$NUT_MODE/ /etc/nut/nut.conf
/etc/nut/nut.conf.new
- mv /etc/nut/nut.conf.new /etc/nut/nut.conf
+if dpkg --compare-versions $2 le 2.6.4-2~ ; then
+rm -f /etc/init.d/nut
+update-rc.d nut remove /dev/null
If /etc/init.d/nut was a conffile, I don't think you get to rm -f it
on upgrade, at least if it was modified.
IIRC, I didn't use dpkg-maintscript-helper because the file is owned by
the nut package in squeeze (which is now a metapackage) and it was not
really working as expected. The init file should probably also be
removed in the nut-client package to support partial upgrades.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121202194344.28b85...@fornost.bigon.be
Bug#694975: release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release-team, please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs #617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen). Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be fixed, but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploads now to close those bugs properly. Thanks, Anton - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.6-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQu7/KAAoJENPhc4PPp/8GmEYP/1tVNb/00D5lvQjzMS8sRaeM AIcYI/Pn5ZTfNBCbFNT5jgh4gecpSTquJyMUxbIC2b41doBVf+G1+SvMH8ow3Wgg rScWYXxmDFpxUKK5iQxXj+FBzxPv7CykJuUFOwDfv+XWos9qsAa/MqDpa+HKjCPQ uCQ9o5vS9qp44keVcZnr3cmXSxNTjOTYqXqi0ww1MPglM/RmFwcb9mVnu7peJzAp 83Jp2S2TYopFDJldtzZa9Nl07wXMIcF+jOWQDu/VcgOY2GzN2SNCKA7nXWKtYY1n aKtwSgAvrfGmm5isyR5ariEkDiQIx2zNXH4m2Eq69qtl4y0/TqeZESKk9BiN7PbG ER7+tK8viK0favDsMnjqfB7vVgudAPTLulpnniFphoyM6geNAW0i+ohWfRwDuCb3 Y9PVtRWgFdWRXUH0Jy93KutfP3lQ7TannbquwHsb6pxiVnPKKWmvoY8BMYmD9C8V frIB5esefsN0/AUszJMMJNUPEKc3UvJjf3epn/eVQHCYU+PaOjh06G/e57NrHIBY jCU+WWeRNbagh93xol6KNoNLWjWzVbhlmmnXsK/w7jpFhjSWPo9tIljS1AJqsnsA JTTiKT10eN3oPHaZpfoqTdKnmzx7vIFKDQrRuY0IFYSEERAd+Xi1qWwCol1AGsdz pVvFkpXnXWKrXfBwN1Ct =1d73 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121202205335.14050.12963.report...@debian.home.debian
Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
On 2012-12-02 21:37, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades.
There are also some (partial) upgrade issues with the 32-bit stuff on amd64
Could you implement those fixes as a minimal tpu?
I don't see any non-documentation change that would be worth stripping
out from -2/-3 without reintroducing some bug.
Perhaps the Built-Using addition, but that only affects the fglrx-source
package which will only be used by a minority of the fglrx users. And
the same code is used in the nvidia packages in wheezy as well.
Andreas
PS: I just noticed filterdiff --exclude *.po* also excluded this chunk:
--- debian/fglrx-driver.postrm (.../12-6+point-1) (revision 1132)
+++ debian/fglrx-driver.postrm (.../1:12-6+point-3)(revision 1132)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
warn_about_remaining_xorg_configuration()
{
# allow to disable the check via preseeding
- db_get fglrx-driver/check-xorg-conf-on-removal
+ db_get fglrx-driver/check-xorg-conf-on-removal || true
test $RET = true || return 0
XORG_CONF=$(grep -l '^[^#]*fglrx' /etc/X11/xorg.conf
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*.conf 2/dev/null || true)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bbc556.7080...@abeckmann.de
Re: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen
Ok, thanks, Michael, for the hint! #694975 Cheers, Anton 2012/12/2 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org: Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track your request. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/calf6qjnyb0sozet4szcsnhxt0-x0coooc-3h7o2ubhzotkg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#694559: marked as done (unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:13:25 +
with message-id 1354486405.15448.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694559: unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44
has caused the Debian Bug report #694559,
regarding unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694559
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
thanks
Hi,
please unblock (and sponsor) package apt-build 0.12.44.
This version contains two bug fixes:
Tl;dr: - Installation failure on all armel machines.
- Unexpected behavior with custom APT Dir::... paths.
Since version 0.12.42 apt-build doesn't install if /dev/cpuinfo exists
but no processor string is available in this output (e.g. armel).
debian/config script greps for processor but do not catch error.
See #694554 (grave). [1]
This package version also fixes APT path buildings. If
Dir::Etc::sourcelist or Dir::Etc::sourceparts is an absolute path,
apt-build won't recognize it, it will append it to Dir and Dir::Etc.
See #694557. [2]
If this is needed for you, the package is on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/apt-build
Download it with:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.44.dsc
Please see attached debdiff. Diffstat:
changelog | 10 ++
config|9 -
postinst | 11 ---
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Regards
Dominique
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694554
[2]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694557
0xB2E4F4F3.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
diffstat for apt-build-0.12.43 apt-build-0.12.44
changelog | 10 ++
config|9 -
postinst | 11 ---
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff -Nru apt-build-0.12.43/debian/changelog apt-build-0.12.44/debian/changelog
--- apt-build-0.12.43/debian/changelog 2012-04-11 23:14:35.0 +0200
+++ apt-build-0.12.44/debian/changelog 2012-11-27 18:43:26.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+apt-build (0.12.44) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Don't fail on postinstallation if no processor found in /proc/cpuinfo.
+LP: #1065678 (Thanks to Dawid Wróbel.) Closes: #694554
+ * Generate APT paths properly with apt-config shell .../f .../d .
+Closes: #694557
+
+ -- Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:43:18 +0100
+
apt-build (0.12.43) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -Nru apt-build-0.12.43/debian/config apt-build-0.12.44/debian/config
--- apt-build-0.12.43/debian/config 2012-04-11 23:11:12.0 +0200
+++ apt-build-0.12.44/debian/config 2012-10-15 23:46:03.0 +0200
@@ -76,9 +76,8 @@
db_subst apt-build/add_to_sourceslist repo $RET
-eval $(apt-config shell etcdir Dir::Etc)
-eval $(apt-config shell sourceslist Dir::Etc::sourcelist)
-eval $(apt-config shell sourcesparts Dir::Etc::sourceparts)
+eval $(apt-config shell sourceslist Dir::Etc::sourcelist/f)
+eval $(apt-config shell sourcesparts Dir::Etc::sourceparts/d)
if [ ! -e $CONFFILE ] ; then
# set to true for initial configuration (conffile does not exist)
@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
db_set apt-build/add_to_sourceslist false
# run loop to prevent errors if some sources does not exist
- for source in /$etcdir$sourceslist /$etcdir$sourcesparts/*.list ; do
+ for source in $sourceslist $sourcesparts*.list ; do
if [ -e $source ] ; then
if grep -Eq ^[[:space:]]*deb file:$repository_dir apt-build main
$source ; then
db_set apt-build/add_to_sourceslist true
@@ -109,7 +108,7 @@
multithreaded=$make_options
elif [ -r /proc/cpuinfo ] [ ! -e $CONFFILE ] ; then
# get number of cores and set as default job argument
- multithreaded=-j$(grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo)
+ multithreaded=-j$(grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo) || true
# only allow whole numbers
case ${multithreaded#-j} in
''|*[!0-9]*|0*)
diff -Nru apt-build-0.12.43/debian/postinst apt-build-0.12.44/debian/postinst
--- apt-build-0.12.43/debian/postinst 2012-04-11 23:11:12.0 +0200
+++ apt-build-0.12.44/debian/postinst 2012-10-15 23:46:46.0 +0200
@@ -64,17 +64,14 @@
# prepare sources.list entry
- eval $(apt-config shell etcdir Dir::Etc)
- eval $(apt-config shell sourceslist Dir::Etc::sourcelist)
- eval $(apt-config shell sourcesparts
