Processed: retitle 703193 to unblock: smokeping/2.6.8-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 703193 unblock: smokeping/2.6.8-2 Bug #703193 [release.debian.org] unblock: smokeping/2.6.9-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: smokeping/2.6.8-2' from 'unblock: smokeping/2.6.9-1' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 703193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703193 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136350191310501.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685230: unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4
Hi Julien, Il giorno ven, 01/03/2013 alle 11.31 +0100, Julien Cristau ha scritto: On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 08:00:27 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: [...] The next step is creating hylafax 6.0.6-5 as mentioned by Ivo De Decker. Should I already prepare these updated package of hylafax now? If possible, yes. The new hylafax version has been uploaded 5 days ago to unstable. The diff against the testing version are the ones already agreed upon, i.e., a very small subset of what was already in unstable. Could you please check if the package may be unblocked? Moreover, I checked the capi4hylafax package that is currently waiting for a pre approval requested on 28 January by Joachim Wiedorn, and I would gladly upload it after the approval. These two packages, if migrated to testing, would really be right ones for the next release. Thanks, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1363503279.4793.7.camel@blatta
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.3.9+dfsg1-1+squeeze8_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze4_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.3_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uhbmh-00087k...@franck.debian.org
Bug#703233: unblock: resiprocate - crash issue fixed
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
There are two fixes, both using patches backported from the upstream
release branch
One of the issues is marked serious because it causes the process to
stop in certain situations.
The other is marked as important because it causes incompatibility with
FreeSWITCH PBXes
diff -Nru resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog
--- resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2012-08-08 15:02:29.0 +0200
+++ resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2013-03-17 12:33:44.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+resiprocate (1.8.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Remove proxy-auth headers after validating them (Closes: #697341)
+ * Discard repeated requests over reliable transport (Closes: #703232)
+
+ -- Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:30:47 +0100
+
resiprocate (1.8.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
@@ -7,7 +14,6 @@
* Fix support for multiple ENUM carriers
* Fix issue with help text causing crash
* Fix clash between DIGEST and mutual TLS when used concurrently
- * Proposed for wheezy unblock (Closes: #681387)
-- Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:02:03 +0200
diff -Nru
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
---
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
2013-03-17 12:28:37.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+From: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
+Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:09:48 +0100
+Subject: remove Proxy-Authorization headers for successful Digest Challenges
+ before forwarding message (closes: #697341) (upstream: r9886, fixed
+ in v1.8.6)
+
+---
+ repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx | 29 -
+ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
b/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
+index c3a8af3..fbaa5e9 100644
+--- a/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
b/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
+@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ DigestAuthenticator::process(repro::RequestContext rc)
+ pairHelper::AuthResult,Data result =
+ Helper::advancedAuthenticateRequest(*sipMessage, realm, a1, 3000);
// was 15
+
+-// Auths authHeaders = sipMessage-header(h_ProxyAuthorizations);
+ switch (result.first)
+ {
+ case Helper::Failed:
+@@ -135,22 +134,26 @@ DigestAuthenticator::process(repro::RequestContext rc)
+
+ // Delete the Proxy-Auth header for this realm.
+ // other Proxy-Auth headers might be needed by a downsteram node
+-/*
+-Auths::iterator i = authHeaders.begin();
+-Auths::iterator j = authHeaders.begin();
+-while( i != authHeaders.end() )
++if (sipMessage-exists(h_ProxyAuthorizations))
+ {
+- if (proxy.isMyDomain(i-param(p_realm)))
+- {
+- j = i++;
+- authHeaders.erase(j);
+- }
+- else
++ Auths authHeaders = sipMessage-header(h_ProxyAuthorizations);
++ Data realm = getRealm(rc);
++
++ // if we find a Proxy-Authorization header for a realm we
handle,
++ // asynchronously fetch the relevant userAuthInfo from the
database
++ for (Auths::iterator i = authHeaders.begin(); i !=
authHeaders.end(); )
+{
+- ++i;
++ if(i-exists(p_realm) isEqualNoCase(i-param(p_realm),
realm))
++ {
++ i = authHeaders.erase(i);
++ }
++ else
++ {
++ ++i;
++ }
+}
+ }
+-*/
++
+ if(!sipMessage-header(h_From).isWellFormed() ||
+sipMessage-header(h_From).isAllContacts())
+ {
diff -Nru
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0002-discard-repeated-requests-received-over-reliable-tra.patch
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0002-discard-repeated-requests-received-over-reliable-tra.patch
---
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0002-discard-repeated-requests-received-over-reliable-tra.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0002-discard-repeated-requests-received-over-reliable-tra.patch
2013-03-17 12:28:37.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+From: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
+Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:28:31 +0100
+Subject: discard repeated requests received over reliable transports (closes:
+ #703232) (upstream: r9998, fixed in v1.8.7)
+
+---
+
Bug#703233: marked as done (unblock: resiprocate - crash issue fixed)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:48:44 +
with message-id 20130317124844.gd4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#703233: unblock: resiprocate - crash issue fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #703233,
regarding unblock: resiprocate - crash issue fixed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
703233: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
There are two fixes, both using patches backported from the upstream
release branch
One of the issues is marked serious because it causes the process to
stop in certain situations.
The other is marked as important because it causes incompatibility with
FreeSWITCH PBXes
diff -Nru resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog
--- resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2012-08-08 15:02:29.0 +0200
+++ resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2013-03-17 12:33:44.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+resiprocate (1.8.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Remove proxy-auth headers after validating them (Closes: #697341)
+ * Discard repeated requests over reliable transport (Closes: #703232)
+
+ -- Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:30:47 +0100
+
resiprocate (1.8.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
@@ -7,7 +14,6 @@
* Fix support for multiple ENUM carriers
* Fix issue with help text causing crash
* Fix clash between DIGEST and mutual TLS when used concurrently
- * Proposed for wheezy unblock (Closes: #681387)
-- Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:02:03 +0200
diff -Nru
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
---
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++
resiprocate-1.8.5/debian/patches/0001-remove-Proxy-Authorization-headers-for-successful-Di.patch
2013-03-17 12:28:37.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+From: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
+Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:09:48 +0100
+Subject: remove Proxy-Authorization headers for successful Digest Challenges
+ before forwarding message (closes: #697341) (upstream: r9886, fixed
+ in v1.8.6)
+
+---
+ repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx | 29 -
+ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
b/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
+index c3a8af3..fbaa5e9 100644
+--- a/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
b/repro/monkeys/DigestAuthenticator.cxx
+@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ DigestAuthenticator::process(repro::RequestContext rc)
+ pairHelper::AuthResult,Data result =
+ Helper::advancedAuthenticateRequest(*sipMessage, realm, a1, 3000);
// was 15
+
+-// Auths authHeaders = sipMessage-header(h_ProxyAuthorizations);
+ switch (result.first)
+ {
+ case Helper::Failed:
+@@ -135,22 +134,26 @@ DigestAuthenticator::process(repro::RequestContext rc)
+
+ // Delete the Proxy-Auth header for this realm.
+ // other Proxy-Auth headers might be needed by a downsteram node
+-/*
+-Auths::iterator i = authHeaders.begin();
+-Auths::iterator j = authHeaders.begin();
+-while( i != authHeaders.end() )
++if (sipMessage-exists(h_ProxyAuthorizations))
+ {
+- if (proxy.isMyDomain(i-param(p_realm)))
+- {
+- j = i++;
+- authHeaders.erase(j);
+- }
+- else
++ Auths authHeaders = sipMessage-header(h_ProxyAuthorizations);
++ Data realm = getRealm(rc);
++
++ // if we find a Proxy-Authorization header for a realm we
handle,
++ // asynchronously fetch the relevant userAuthInfo from the
database
++ for (Auths::iterator i = authHeaders.begin(); i !=
authHeaders.end(); )
+{
+- ++i;
++ if(i-exists(p_realm) isEqualNoCase(i-param(p_realm),
realm))
++ {
++ i = authHeaders.erase(i);
++ }
++ else
++ {
++ ++i;
++ }
+}
+ }
+-*/
++
+
Re: [Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Dropping owncloud from Wheezy?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:19:01PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: It would indeed be sad but we don't have many options at this stage. I will put my cards on the table and say I favour having a good quality package in backports and the chance for ownCloud to be in Jessie. I suggest there is a further week or so for the maintainers to put together a maintenance plan if they wish but after that we look seriously at removal. Well, a week passed and a plan hasn't appeared, so I'm scheduling removal tonight. I'm sorry we couldn't resolve it more positively. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#702186: marked as done (RM: owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.3)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:38:18 + with message-id 20130317133818.ge4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: [Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Dropping owncloud from Wheezy? has caused the Debian Bug report #702186, regarding RM: owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 702186: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal As was brought up recently, owncloud is anticipated to be a nightmare security-wise during wheezy's lifetime: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/03/msg00042.html It has yet to land in a stable release and has no reverse-dependencies. Thanks, Mike ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:19:01PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: It would indeed be sad but we don't have many options at this stage. I will put my cards on the table and say I favour having a good quality package in backports and the chance for ownCloud to be in Jessie. I suggest there is a further week or so for the maintainers to put together a maintenance plan if they wish but after that we look seriously at removal. Well, a week passed and a plan hasn't appeared, so I'm scheduling removal tonight. I'm sorry we couldn't resolve it more positively. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#703238: unblock: remmina/1.0.0-4+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock I'd like to receive a pre-approval to upload into unstable a fix for bug #668020 (and its merged ones), which could result very annoying. One of the submitters confirmed the proposed patch fixes the bug for him (thanks to Bernhard Schmidt for his efforts!), so it received a first testing in advance. I chose 1.0.0-4+deb7u1 as version because I already uploaded 1.0.0-5 to experimental. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) diff -Nru remmina-1.0.0/debian/changelog remmina-1.0.0/debian/changelog --- remmina-1.0.0/debian/changelog 2012-05-24 22:37:17.0 +0200 +++ remmina-1.0.0/debian/changelog 2013-03-17 14:39:39.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +remmina (1.0.0-4+deb7u1) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Bernhard Schmidt ] + * Cherry-pick commit 9243d35 from upstream Git repository to fix a +crash when resizing window to fit remote resolution (Closes: #668020). + + -- Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:37:39 +0100 + remmina (1.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Martijn van Brummelen ] diff -Nru remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/fix-crash-on-resize.patch remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/fix-crash-on-resize.patch --- remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/fix-crash-on-resize.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/fix-crash-on-resize.patch 2013-03-07 15:13:50.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +From 1901a1e9e5282c1deca2f5f98476e2c7e9243d35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jean-Louis Dupond jean-lo...@dupond.be +Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:12:11 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] Closes #63: fix typo when fitting window + +--- + remmina/src/remmina_connection_window.c |2 +- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/remmina/src/remmina_connection_window.c b/remmina/src/remmina_connection_window.c +index 7ff1246..2ba8193 100644 +--- a/remmina/src/remmina_connection_window.c b/remmina/src/remmina_connection_window.c +@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static gboolean remmina_connection_holder_toolbar_autofit_restore(RemminaConnect + remmina_connection_holder_get_desktop_size(cnnhld, width, height, TRUE); + gtk_widget_get_allocation(priv-notebook, na); + gtk_widget_get_allocation(cnnobj-scrolled_container, ca); +- gtk_widget_get_allocation(priv-toolbar, ca); ++ gtk_widget_get_allocation(priv-toolbar, ta); + gtk_window_resize(GTK_WINDOW(cnnhld-cnnwin), MAX(1, width + na.width - ca.width), + MAX(1, height + ta.height + na.height - ca.height)); + gtk_container_check_resize(GTK_CONTAINER(cnnhld-cnnwin)); +-- +1.7.10 + diff -Nru remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/series remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/series --- remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/series 2012-05-24 22:37:17.0 +0200 +++ remmina-1.0.0/debian/patches/series 2013-03-07 15:13:50.0 +0100 @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ fullname.patch systray.patch scroll.patch +fix-crash-on-resize.patch
Bug#703125: tpu: wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1
wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 has been uploaded through wheezy-security. Cheers, Balint 2013/3/16 Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tpu Hi, I would like to upload wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 to testing-proposed-updates to fix open security issues in wheezy. It would have the same content as wireshark/1.8.2-5 just bumping the changelog. Currently 1.8.2-2 is in testing and 1.8.6-1 is in unstable. Originally I wanted to let 1.8.2-5 migrate to wheezy, but I have uploaded 1.8.6-1 to unstable (instead of experimental) accidentally which prevents the migration. Thanks, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAK0OdpwdFYHgLD_T75JFgBeznukBvxG==d=7_zqdypxh8vl...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#703125: marked as done (tpu: wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:59:03 +0100 with message-id CAK0OdpwdFYHgLD_T75JFgBeznukBvxG==d=7_zqdypxh8vl...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: tpu: wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 has caused the Debian Bug report #703125, regarding tpu: wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 703125: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703125 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tpu Hi, I would like to upload wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 to testing-proposed-updates to fix open security issues in wheezy. It would have the same content as wireshark/1.8.2-5 just bumping the changelog. Currently 1.8.2-2 is in testing and 1.8.6-1 is in unstable. Originally I wanted to let 1.8.2-5 migrate to wheezy, but I have uploaded 1.8.6-1 to unstable (instead of experimental) accidentally which prevents the migration. Thanks, Balint signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 has been uploaded through wheezy-security. Cheers, Balint 2013/3/16 Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tpu Hi, I would like to upload wireshark/1.8.2-5wheezy1 to testing-proposed-updates to fix open security issues in wheezy. It would have the same content as wireshark/1.8.2-5 just bumping the changelog. Currently 1.8.2-2 is in testing and 1.8.6-1 is in unstable. Originally I wanted to let 1.8.2-5 migrate to wheezy, but I have uploaded 1.8.6-1 to unstable (instead of experimental) accidentally which prevents the migration. Thanks, Balint ---End Message---
Bug#702013: unblock: chromium-browser/25.0.1364.97-1
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:49:46PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 19:11:43 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: On 02/03/2013 22:57, Michael Gilbert wrote: The arm builds have been nothing but trouble so far, and without upstream interest they are likely to continue to break with most upstream releases. My vote is removal, but its really Guiseppe's call. I totally agree, we should drop arm support. Do I need to upload another revision without the arm arch in debian/control ? Yes please. Any moves on this? Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#703241: unblock: intel-microcode/1.20130222.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package intel-microcode Intel released a new version of their microcode dump, which updates the microcode for a widely-used processor family (latest i5/i7: e.g. i5-3570k and i7-3770s, signature 0x306a9). Although I am not privy to any extremely serious bugs this update would solve, it likely deals with enhanced support or stability fixes for PEBS or the on-die memory/PCI controler. Thus, it is probably an important update. It is also not likely to be widely deployed on motherboards on the field, thus being a bit more important that we distribute it. There should be no risk of regression, as the only change was the replacement of the latest microcode data file, and that only changed a single microcode update (verified using per-microcode-update sha256 hashes). The packages have been in unstable for 12 days, without any issues being reported. unblock intel-microcode/1.20130222.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.4.36+ (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317145155.ga6...@khazad-dum.debian.net
Re: Fixing lucky 13 CVE-2013-0169 in gnutls28
On 2013-02-23 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: The plan seems ok to me in general. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 18:37:12 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: +# workaround for guile testsuite failure. +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),armel armhf mipsel)) + DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --disable-largefile +endif + Disabling lfs because of guile sounds fairly bad though, assuming this is what this does... As you do not ssem to be convinced, how about plan B: 1. Upload proposed packages. 2. If armel armhf mipsel break due to --disable-largefile stop using --disable-largefile there and stop providing guile-gnutls on these archs. cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317150029.gb3...@downhill.g.la
Bug#702013: unblock: chromium-browser/25.0.1364.97-1
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 14:22 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:49:46PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 19:11:43 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: I totally agree, we should drop arm support. Do I need to upload another revision without the arm arch in debian/control ? Yes please. Any moves on this? chromium-browser (25.0.1364.152-1) unstable; urgency=high . * [8761d73] Remove armel and armhf. We cannot support them in wheezy That version already migrated. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1363532797.2662.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#702195: marked as done (pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:06:17 +
with message-id 20130317150617.gg4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702195: unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #702195,
regarding pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
702195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
thanks
Hi Release Team,
There are several important, RC bugfix over syslog-ng/3.3.5-2 in Wheezy.
First is virtual console differences between Linux and kFreeBSD[1]. It's
tty10 on the former and ttyva on the latter. Without fixing #697042 ,
syslog-ng would flood kFreeBSD logs with:
Error opening file for writing; filename='/dev/tty10', error='Operation not
supported (45)'
The default syslog-ng configuration used wrong path for mail related
logs, as noted in #692056 [2].
Don't use symlinked systemd configuration files, as noted in
#690067 [3]. This caused all short of problems as dpkg doesn't support
it.
Last but not least the one which affects the DSA team is #702131 [4].
The fix is to handle EINVAL as well for eventfd2 errors.
The fixes are small and usually one liners. Debdiff is attached.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697042
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692056
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690067
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702131
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog 2012-05-13 00:47:21.0 +0200
+++ syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog 2013-03-03 19:22:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+syslog-ng (3.3.5-3) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ [ Gergely Nagy alger...@madhouse-project.org ]
+ * Don't mark systemd symlinks in /etc as conffiles.
+ * Instead of installing systemd service file symlinks, install a
+conffile, that includes the real service file (closes: #690067).
+ * Do not forcibly remove the systemd service files, that code is not
+needed anymore.
+ * Use the standard /var/log/mail.{info,err,warn} location for the various
+mail-related logs (closes: #692056).
+ * Use /dev/ttyva on kFreeBSD as the target of the d_console_all
+destination (closes: #697042).
+
+ [ Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) ]
+ * Fix ivykis fallback on eventfd2 errors with the addition of
+ivykis_fallback_fix.patch (closes: #702131).
+
+ -- Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:57:00 +0100
+
syslog-ng (3.3.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Gergely Nagy alger...@madhouse-project.org ]
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch 2013-03-03 17:53:25.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+Description: make ivykis properly fallback on eventfd2 errors
+ The Linux glibc eventfd() wrapper function (around the SYS_eventfd{,2}
+ system calls) returns EINVAL if it is given a nonzero flags argument
+ and SYS_eventfd2 (which is the variant of SYS_eventfd that takes a flags
+ argument) isn't implemented, while iv_event_raw was expecting to get
+ either ENOSYS or success.
+ .
+ Instead of falling back on SYS_eventfd by calling the eventfd() wrapper
+ again with a zero flags argument and then setting the O_NONBLOCK and
+ O_CLOEXEC flags by hand, disable use of eventfd on systems that have
+ SYS_eventfd but not SYS_eventfd2 as a minimally invasive fix for the
+ stable branches.
+ Taken from: https://github.com/buytenh/ivykis/commit/89f67f97477aeba24aebfc58ae1a17e5bea69724.patch
+Author: Lennert Buytenhek buyt...@wantstofly.org
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/702131
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Last-Update: 2012-12-09
+
+---
+
+--- syslog-ng-3.3.5.orig/lib/ivykis/modules/iv_event_raw.c
syslog-ng-3.3.5/lib/ivykis/modules/iv_event_raw.c
+@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int iv_event_raw_register(struct iv_even
+
+ ret = eventfd2(0, EFD_NONBLOCK | EFD_CLOEXEC);
+ if (ret 0) {
+- if (errno != ENOSYS) {
++ if (errno != ENOSYS errno != EINVAL) {
+ perror(eventfd2);
+ return -1;
+ }
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series
Bug#683142: marked as done (unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy3)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:11:36 + with message-id 20130317151136.gh4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#683142: unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy3 has caused the Debian Bug report #683142, regarding unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 683142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683142 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception unblock bdii/5.2.12-1 Hi! The bdii package was removed from testing due to an RC bug, together with the packages that depends on it. The 5.2.12-1 update fixes the RC bug (bug #663444). I would like to request a freeze exception for this update to allow the bdii package and the packages depending on it to be part of the release. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:21:28PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Jonathan Nieder wrote (03 Jan 2013 07:25:58 GMT) : Any news? Is the version of bdii currently in tpu the right one for wheezy, or are there more updates coming? Given there's been no feedback from Mattias on this bug since October, and bdii hasn't been in testing since July, I recommend the release team rejects this unblock request. Agreed. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#685663: marked as done (unblock nordugrid-arc/2.0.0-3)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:12:08 + with message-id 20130317151208.gi4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#685663: unblock nordugrid-arc/2.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #685663, regarding unblock nordugrid-arc/2.0.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685663 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Control: block -1 by 683142 unblock nordugrid-arc/2.0.0-3 The nordugrid-arc 2.0.0-3 package had already migrated to testing before the freeze, but was kicked out because a dependency of one of its binary packages was removed due to an RC classified bug. That package (bdii) has since been fixed and an unblock request for the fix has been filed. This is a request to unblock this package so that it can get back in when its currently blocked dependency (bdii) is unblocked. Mattias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:25:34PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Jonathan Nieder wrote (03 Jan 2013 07:31:25 GMT) : If I understand correctly then nordugrid-arc was not part of squeeze, so stable users are not relying on it yet. In that case I would suggest considering providing the package for wheezy through wheezy-backports after the release, which should make later fixes easier. What do you think? Same as #683142 (and dependent on it, since nordugrid-arc-aris Depends: bdii): no reply from Mattias for months, and nordugrid-arc was removed from testing last July, so I recommend the release team rejects this unblock request, and the maintainer uses backports after the release as they see fit to provide packages for stable users. Agreed. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1
Control: tag -1 + pending On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi all I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload? Regards, Salvatore Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1
Processing control commands: tag -1 + pending Bug #688321 [release.debian.org] unblock: quota/4.01-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 688321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688321 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688321.136353358618150.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702195: unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:06 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 08:02:32PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: There are several important, RC bugfix over syslog-ng/3.3.5-2 in Wheezy. Approved the t-p-u upload, thanks. I thought the conclusion was that we needed a new upload, as per MID:5133c66e.3050...@debian.org and following? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1363533935.2662.43.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#702195: unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #702195 {Done: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #702195 to the same values
previously set
tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #702195 [release.debian.org] pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
702195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702195.136353465225870.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702195: unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Control: reopen -1 Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 03:06:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 08:02:32PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: There are several important, RC bugfix over syslog-ng/3.3.5-2 in Wheezy. Approved the t-p-u upload, thanks. Actually, not. With the lack of threading and my trying to catch up on my mailbox, I hadn't yet seen the discussion about this one. Please prepare an updated t-p-u upload. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#703238: unblock: remmina/1.0.0-4+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Control: tag -1 + confirmed On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:47:23PM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock I'd like to receive a pre-approval to upload into unstable a fix for bug #668020 (and its merged ones), which could result very annoying. One of the submitters confirmed the proposed patch fixes the bug for him (thanks to Bernhard Schmidt for his efforts!), so it received a first testing in advance. I chose 1.0.0-4+deb7u1 as version because I already uploaded 1.0.0-5 to experimental. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#703238: unblock: remmina/1.0.0-4+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Processing control commands: tag -1 + confirmed Bug #703238 [release.debian.org] unblock: remmina/1.0.0-4+deb7u1 (pre-approval) Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 703238: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703238 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b703238.136353489527912.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702209: unblock (pre-approval): dpkg/1.16.10
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2013-03-06 03:26, Guillem Jover wrote: Hi! There appears to be something in my dpkg unblock requests that seems to make the list setup unhappy (previously in #690920), just sending this so that it (hopefully) appears on the list. For the real details please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702209 Thanks, Guillem Feel free to go ahead with these changes. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5145e76a.10...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#702209: unblock (pre-approval): dpkg/1.16.10
Processing control commands: tags -1 confirmed Bug #702209 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): dpkg/1.16.10 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 702209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702209 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702209.13635357362057.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#702394: unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20
Processing control commands: tag -1 + d-i confirmed Bug #702394 [release.debian.org] unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed. -- 702394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702394.13635358983526.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702394: unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20
Control: tag -1 + d-i confirmed On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:02:40AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: Hi, Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 since it improves some glyph lacks in Japanese, Korean and Chinese language with graphical installer. Looks sane, but needs a d-i ack for the udeb. Tagging and CCing. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#702394: unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i On 2013-03-06 01:02, Hideki Yamane wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-CC: ttf-cjk-comp...@packages.debian.org Hi, Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 since it improves some glyph lacks in Japanese, Korean and Chinese language with graphical installer. Assuming the d-i side is okay with these changes (CC'ed), I will gladly unblock this package. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5145e8ad.7030...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#702394: unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20
Processing control commands: tags -1 confirmed d-i Bug #702394 [release.debian.org] unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702394 to the same tags previously set -- 702394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702394.13635360544671.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702275: marked as done (unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.58-1+2013b)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:12:16 +
with message-id 20130317161216.gn4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702275: unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a
has caused the Debian Bug report #702275,
regarding unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.58-1+2013b
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
702275: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702275
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package libdatetime-timezone-perl 1.57-1+2013a.
The new release is based on the Olson database 2013a.
It does not contain any source code changes, just the new timezone
data. I'm attaching a stripped down debdiff which contains only one
timezone file as an example.
unblock libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a
Thanks in advance,
gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=Z4tW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/Changes libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/Changes
--- libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/Changes 2012-12-01 05:08:04.0 +0100
+++ libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/Changes 2013-03-02 21:23:47.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+1.572013-03-02
+
+- This release is based on version 2013a of the Olson database. This release
+ includes contemporary changes for Chile as well as several new zones -
+ Asia/Khandyga, Asia/Ust-Nera, and Europe/Busingen. It also includes a number
+ of historical changes.
+
+
1.562012-11-30
- The previous release was missing some files. That's what I get for running
diff -Nru libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/LICENSE libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/LICENSE
--- libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/LICENSE 2012-12-01 05:08:04.0 +0100
+++ libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/LICENSE 2013-03-02 21:23:47.0 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-This software is copyright (c) 2012 by Dave Rolsky.
+This software is copyright (c) 2013 by Dave Rolsky.
This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself.
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
--- The GNU General Public License, Version 1, February 1989 ---
-This software is Copyright (c) 2012 by Dave Rolsky.
+This software is Copyright (c) 2013 by Dave Rolsky.
This is free software, licensed under:
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@
--- The Artistic License 1.0 ---
-This software is Copyright (c) 2012 by Dave Rolsky.
+This software is Copyright (c) 2013 by Dave Rolsky.
This is free software, licensed under:
diff -Nru libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/Makefile.PL libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/Makefile.PL
--- libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/Makefile.PL 2012-12-01 05:08:04.0 +0100
+++ libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/Makefile.PL 2013-03-02 21:23:47.0 +0100
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
vars = 0,
warnings = 0
},
- VERSION = 1.56,
+ VERSION = 1.57,
test = {
TESTS = t/*.t
}
diff -Nru libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/README libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/README
--- libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/README 2012-12-01 05:08:04.0 +0100
+++ libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/README 2013-03-02 21:23:47.0 +0100
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
This archive contains the distribution DateTime-TimeZone,
-version 1.56:
+version 1.57:
Time zone object base class and factory
-This software is copyright (c) 2012 by Dave Rolsky.
+This software is copyright (c) 2013 by Dave Rolsky.
This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself.
diff -Nru libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.56/debian/changelog libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.57/debian/changelog
---
Bug#702746: marked as done (release.debian.org: pre-approval: libguestfs 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:12:50 + with message-id 1363536770.2662.44.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702746: release.debian.org: pre-approval: libguestfs 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #702746, regarding release.debian.org: pre-approval: libguestfs 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 702746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702746 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, I'd like to fix libguestfs bug #702624 (guestmount does not work) via tpu. It is an issue that I actually fixed in unstable but missed when preparing and uploading 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u1 for wheezy a few weeks later. Cheers, -Hilko diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index e909234..b040929 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libguestfs (1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2) testing; urgency=low + + * Make sure that a build of the library that contains FUSE support is +installed. Thanks to Holger Levsen for spotting this. (Closes: +#702624) + + -- Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:03:13 +0100 + libguestfs (1:1.18.1-1+deb7u1) testing; urgency=low * [3ad62ed] Removed useless dh_python* overrides (Closes: #681587) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index f496a8e..0af68b6 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ override_dh_auto_install: # We assume that the Python version used for building the Python # bindings doesn't affect the outcome of those builds. set -e; for p in \ - default \ $(filter-out $(PYTHON_DEFAULT), $(PYTHONS)) \ $(filter-out $(RUBY_DEFAULT), $(RUBIES)) \ + default \ ; do \ dh_auto_install --builddir=$(CURDIR)/debian/build-$$p ; \ done ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 16:41 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: * Adam D. Barratt: On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 00:26 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: I'd like to fix libguestfs bug #702624 (guestmount does not work) via tpu. Please go ahead. Thank you. I am uploading now. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Re: ifupdown in wheezy
Hello, On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:30:28 +0100 Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by wrote: Subject: ifupdown in wheezy [Reminder] -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#702458: unblock: xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes
On 2013-03-06 21:46, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval) On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal The current README.Debian is quite old It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system (e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more recently on the upstream mailing list http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702337 I'm happy to overhaul this document and submit a debdiff for the release team to review - please confirm if this work should go ahead. No other files in the package will be changed. I would be willing to consider this documentation fix if it indeed is as bad as you suggest. Though, I'd appreciate seeing a debdiff before saying yay or nay. Ok, I will collaborate with pkg-xen team to prepare a revised document and submit it to the release team for final approval XCP has been highlighted as a major feature of wheezy: http://www.debian.org/News/2012/20120425 so I think it is a good idea to make fixes like this. Hi, Any news on this? ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5145ef62.9090...@thykier.net
Bug#702458: unblock: xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes
On 17/03/13 17:29, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2013-03-06 21:46, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval) On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal The current README.Debian is quite old It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system (e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more recently on the upstream mailing list http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702337 I'm happy to overhaul this document and submit a debdiff for the release team to review - please confirm if this work should go ahead. No other files in the package will be changed. I would be willing to consider this documentation fix if it indeed is as bad as you suggest. Though, I'd appreciate seeing a debdiff before saying yay or nay. Ok, I will collaborate with pkg-xen team to prepare a revised document and submit it to the release team for final approval XCP has been highlighted as a major feature of wheezy: http://www.debian.org/News/2012/20120425 so I think it is a good idea to make fixes like this. Hi, Any news on this? The documentation patch was submitted on the bug report I'm not sure if it has been released yet -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5145efbd.8010...@pocock.com.au
Bug#698925: marked as done (unblock: glpi/0.83.31-2)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:28:53 +0100
with message-id 5145ef45.6070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#698925: unblock: glpi/0.83.31-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #698925,
regarding unblock: glpi/0.83.31-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
698925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package glpi
This fixes a security issue, and should allow glpi not to be removed
from wheezy.
Changelog:
glpi (0.83.31-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Security fixes:
Replace embedded copy of extjs by Debian package, the embedded one
contains a flash file built with a vulnerable version of yui
(charts.swf).
(Closes: #694642)
* Urgency high, this is a RC bug
Full debdiff attached.
Regards,
Pierre
unblock glpi/0.83.31-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.55.pollux-grsec (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru glpi-0.83.31/debian/changelog glpi-0.83.31/debian/changelog
--- glpi-0.83.31/debian/changelog 2012-07-22 21:47:52.0 +0200
+++ glpi-0.83.31/debian/changelog 2013-01-25 11:37:11.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+glpi (0.83.31-2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Security fixes:
+Replace embedded copy of extjs by Debian package, the embedded one
+contains a flash file built with a vulnerable version of yui (charts.swf).
+(Closes: #694642)
+ * Urgency high, this is a RC bug
+
+ -- Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:37:09 +0100
+
glpi (0.83.31-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Imported Upstream version 0.83.31
diff -Nru glpi-0.83.31/debian/control glpi-0.83.31/debian/control
--- glpi-0.83.31/debian/control 2012-03-10 11:37:14.0 +0100
+++ glpi-0.83.31/debian/control 2013-01-25 11:32:56.0 +0100
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
ttf-freefont,
tinymce,
libphp-phpmailer,
+libjs-extjs,
${misc:Depends}
Description: IT and Asset management software
GLPI stands for Gestionnaire libre de parc informatique,
diff -Nru glpi-0.83.31/debian/rules glpi-0.83.31/debian/rules
--- glpi-0.83.31/debian/rules 2012-04-28 16:58:14.0 +0200
+++ glpi-0.83.31/debian/rules 2013-01-25 11:34:15.0 +0100
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
rm -rf $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/glpi/lib/phpcas
rm -rf $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/glpi/lib/tiny_mce
rm -rf $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/glpi/lib/phpmailer
+ rm -rf $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/glpi/lib/extjs; \
+ ln -s /usr/share/javascript/extjs $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/glpi/lib/extjs
build-arch: build
build-indep: build
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2013-03-06 21:37, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
#694642 got downgraded since last time I looged. I have to admit that I
am considering to just ignore the embedded swf issue Wheezy[1] and
call this a day. I know it is not as satisfying for you (or me for that
matter), but I think it is the pragmatic thing to do here.
That said, you can just upload that version to sid; if we change our
minds the fixed version will have had a bit more time in sid. And if
not, then the bug is at least fixed in the start of Jessie.
~Niels
[1] We already got a few DFSG-incompatible JSON issues that won't be
fixed in Wheezy.
Seems like no one disagreed, so closing.
~Niels---End Message---
Processed: tagging 702458
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 702458 + moreinfo Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval) Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 702458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136353832520401.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702458: unblock: xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes
On 2013-03-17 17:30, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] Hi, Any news on this? The documentation patch was submitted on the bug report Okay, I was (and still am) expecting a debdiff attached to this bug (once the changes are finalized that is). I'm not sure if it has been released yet AFAICT it has not been uploaded. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5145f17c.1050...@thykier.net
Bug#702293: unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-10
Le jeudi 7 mars 2013 11:10:33, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : After explaining my problem on IRC, formorer showed me an SQL expression that creates plpgsql only if needed. You'll notice that plpgsql is created with CREATE LANGUAGE because since PostgreSQL 9, plpgsql is created by default. Hence, if it needs to be created the old CREATE LANGUAGE construct should be used. I tried installing dspam with this patch with both PostgreSQL 8.4 from Squeeze and PostgreSQL 9.1 from Wheezy with success. Purging works fine too. If this diff suits you, should I rather upload to tpu with a new changelog entry as in the attached debdiff or merge the entry in the previous one so that only one upload appears to have been done? Forgive me for resending this, I thought maybe this issue had be forgotten. If this is merely a consequence of your work overload, then I send you my full apologize. Best regards, Thomas diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog --- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-03-04 17:39:52.0 +0100 +++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-03-07 11:03:34.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ +dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-11) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low + + * Create plpgsql only if it is not loaded yet. + + -- Thomas Preud'homme robo...@debian.org Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:25:49 +0100 + dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-10) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low - * Explicitely require legacy mode for string escaping in PostgreSQL since it + * Explicitly require legacy mode for string escaping in PostgreSQL since it now defaults to standard compliant mode (Closes: #694942). * Fix error when creating database in PostgreSQL by creating plpgsql as extension instead of language. diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/sqlfiles/install-dbadmin/pgsql dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/sqlfiles/install-dbadmin/pgsql --- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/sqlfiles/install-dbadmin/pgsql 2013-03-04 17:39:52.0 +0100 +++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/sqlfiles/install-dbadmin/pgsql 2013-03-07 11:03:34.0 +0100 @@ -1 +1,19 @@ -CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS plpgsql; +CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.create_plpgsql_language () +RETURNS TEXT +AS $$ +CREATE LANGUAGE plpgsql; +SELECT 'language plpgsql created'::TEXT; +$$ +LANGUAGE 'sql'; + +SELECT CASE WHEN + (SELECT true::BOOLEAN + FROM pg_language +WHERE lanname='plpgsql') +THEN + (SELECT 'language already installed'::TEXT) +ELSE + (SELECT public.create_plpgsql_language()) +END; + +DROP FUNCTION public.create_plpgsql_language (); signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#703184: marked as done (unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.16)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:16:55 +0100 with message-id 5145fa87.9010...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#703184: unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.16 has caused the Debian Bug report #703184, regarding unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 703184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cups; it polishes the fix for one security bug (STR#4223, CVE-2012-5519, #692791, privilege escalation) and one important bug (#697970, usb quirk). Here's the changelog: cups (1.5.3-2.16) unstable; urgency=low . * Backport upstream documentation fix for STR#4223 lpadmin to root privilege escalation * Correct usb-backend quirk for Epson Stylus Photo 750, thanks to Denis Prost (Closes: #697970) debdiff is attached, thanks in advance, cheers! OdyX unblock cups/1.5.3-2.16 diff -Nru cups-1.5.3/debian/changelog cups-1.5.3/debian/changelog --- cups-1.5.3/debian/changelog 2013-02-27 12:59:38.0 +0100 +++ cups-1.5.3/debian/changelog 2013-03-11 18:32:38.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +cups (1.5.3-2.16) unstable; urgency=low + + * Backport upstream documentation fix for STR#4223 lpadmin to root +privilege escalation + * Correct usb-backend quirk for Epson Stylus Photo 750, thanks to +Denis Prost (Closes: #697970) + + -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:18:37 +0100 + cups (1.5.3-2.15) unstable; urgency=low [ Till Kamppeter ] diff -Nru cups-1.5.3/debian/patches/split-configuration-files-STR4223.patch cups-1.5.3/debian/patches/split-configuration-files-STR4223.patch --- cups-1.5.3/debian/patches/split-configuration-files-STR4223.patch 2013-01-20 17:20:11.0 +0100 +++ cups-1.5.3/debian/patches/split-configuration-files-STR4223.patch 2013-03-11 18:32:38.0 +0100 @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ man/cupsd.conf.man --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/help/ref-cups-files-conf.html.in -@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@ +@@ -0,0 +1,513 @@ +HTML +!-- SECTION: References -- +HEAD @@ -307,24 +307,6 @@ +for data files./P + + -+H2 CLASS=titleSPAN CLASS=infoCUPS 1.2/OS X 10.5/SPANA NAME=DefaultAuthTypeDefaultAuthType/A/H2 -+ -+H3Examples/H3 -+ -+PRE CLASS=command -+DefaultAuthType Basic -+DefaultAuthType BasicDigest -+DefaultAuthType Digest -+DefaultAuthType Negotiate -+/PRE -+ -+H3Description/H3 -+ -+PThe CODEDefaultAuthType/CODE directive specifies the type -+of authentication to use for IPP operations that require a -+username. The default is CODEBasic/CODE./P -+ -+ +H2 CLASS=titleA NAME=DocumentRootDocumentRoot/A/H2 + +H3Examples/H3 @@ -764,7 +746,44 @@ +/HTML --- a/doc/help/ref-cupsd-conf.html.in +++ b/doc/help/ref-cupsd-conf.html.in -@@ -191,82 +191,6 @@ +@@ -43,36 +43,6 @@ + automatically handles restarting the scheduler./P + + +-H2 CLASS=titleA NAME=AccessLogAccessLog/A/H2 +- +-H3Examples/H3 +- +-PRE CLASS=command +-AccessLog /var/log/cups/access_log +-AccessLog /var/log/cups/access_log-%s +-AccessLog syslog +-/PRE +- +-H3Description/H3 +- +-PThe CODEAccessLog/CODE directive sets the name of the +-access log file. If the filename is not absolute then it is +-assumed to be relative to the A +-HREF=#ServerRootCODEServerRoot/CODE/A directory. The +-access log file is stored in common log format and can be used +-by any web access reporting tool to generate a report on CUPS +-server activity./P +- +-PThe server name can be included in the filename by using +-CODE%s/CODE in the name./P +- +-PThe special name syslog can be used to send the access +-information to the system log instead of a plain file./P +- +-PThe default access log file is +-VAR@CUPS_LOGDIR@/access_log/VAR./P +- +- + H2 CLASS=titleA NAME=AccessLogLevelAccessLogLevel/A/H2 + + H3Examples/H3 +@@ -191,82 +161,6 @@ HREF=#LimitCODELimit/CODE/A section./P @@ -847,7 +866,317 @@ H2 CLASS=titleA NAME=AuthTypeAuthType/A/H2 H3Examples/H3 -@@ -2544,65 +2468,6 @@ +@@ -898,40 +792,6 @@ + PThe default is to not allow classification overrides./P + + +-H2 CLASS=titleSPAN CLASS=infoCUPS 1.1.15/SPANA NAME=ConfigFilePermConfigFilePerm/A/H2 +- +-H3Examples/H3 +- +-PRE CLASS=command +-ConfigFilePerm 0644 +-ConfigFilePerm 0640 +-/PRE +- +-H3Description/H3 +- +-PThe CODEConfigFilePerm/CODE directive specifies the permissions to use when the scheduler writes configuration and cache files, typically in response to IPP or HTTP requests. The default is @CUPS_CONFIG_FILE_PERM@./P +-
Bug#703199: marked as done (unblock: icu/4.8.1.1-11)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:23:13 +0100
with message-id 5145fc01.7080...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#703199: unblock: icu/4.8.1.1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #703199,
regarding unblock: icu/4.8.1.1-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
703199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package icu
This patch fixes ICU bug 702982, severity important. The bug fix is a
one-line (actually one character) change to a table in ICU that fixes a
potential crash rendering incremental Malayalam text input. This patch
has been applied upstream, and upstream has encouraged distributions to
take it. The Ubuntu version of ICU already includes this patch. Since
this is a bug of priority important (which I set it to because a crash
caused by a particular pattern of characters is a potential DOS attack)
and the package can go into testing through unstable, I hope you will
grant the unblock request. Thanks for considering.
unblock icu/4.8.1.1-11
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru icu-4.8.1.1/debian/changelog icu-4.8.1.1/debian/changelog
--- icu-4.8.1.1/debian/changelog 2012-11-17 14:37:40.0 -0500
+++ icu-4.8.1.1/debian/changelog 2013-03-16 14:58:26.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+icu (4.8.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix crash on rendering incremental Malayalam text input. Thanks Colin
+Watson. (Closes: #702982)
+
+ -- Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:58:15 -0400
+
icu (4.8.1.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
* Include pkg-config files in dev package. Thanks Tommi Vainikainen.
diff -Nru icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/mlym-crash.patch icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/mlym-crash.patch
--- icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/mlym-crash.patch 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/mlym-crash.patch 2013-03-16 14:56:23.0 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Description: Fix crash on rendering incremental Malayalam text input
+Author: Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com
+Origin: other, https://ssl.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/9948
+Forwarded: https://ssl.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/9948
+Last-Update: 2013-03-13
+
+Index: b/source/layout/IndicClassTables.cpp
+===
+--- a/source/layout/IndicClassTables.cpp
b/source/layout/IndicClassTables.cpp
+@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@
+
+ static const IndicClassTable kndaClassTable = {0x0C80, 0x0CEF, 4, KNDA_SCRIPT_FLAGS, kndaCharClasses, kndaSplitTable};
+
+-static const IndicClassTable mlymClassTable = {0x0D00, 0x0D6F, 3, MLYM_SCRIPT_FLAGS, mlymCharClasses, mlymSplitTable};
++static const IndicClassTable mlymClassTable = {0x0D00, 0x0D6F, 4, MLYM_SCRIPT_FLAGS, mlymCharClasses, mlymSplitTable};
+
+ static const IndicClassTable sinhClassTable = {0x0D80, 0x0DF4, 4, SINH_SCRIPT_FLAGS, sinhCharClasses, sinhSplitTable};
+
diff -Nru icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/series icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/series
--- icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/series 2012-05-24 13:52:17.0 -0400
+++ icu-4.8.1.1/debian/patches/series 2013-03-16 14:55:46.0 -0400
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
pathmax.patch
CVE-2011-4599.patch
indic-ccmp.patch
+mlym-crash.patch
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2013-03-16 20:15, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package icu
This patch fixes ICU bug 702982, severity important. The bug fix is a
one-line (actually one character) change to a table in ICU that fixes a
potential crash rendering incremental Malayalam text input. This patch
has been applied upstream, and upstream has encouraged distributions to
take it. The Ubuntu version of ICU already includes this patch. Since
this is a bug of priority important (which I set it to because a crash
caused by a particular pattern of characters is a potential DOS attack)
and the package can go into testing through unstable, I hope you will
grant the unblock request. Thanks for considering.
unblock icu/4.8.1.1-11
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT
Bug#702468: marked as done (unblock: avahi/0.6.31-2)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:29:24 +0100
with message-id 5145fd74.50...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702468: unblock: avahi/0.6.31-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #702468,
regarding unblock: avahi/0.6.31-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
702468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package avahi
The main fix is making avahi-daemon compatible with the ifupdown changes
that were introduced in wheezy. Without that, the boot process can be
blocked by avahi-daemon when ifupdown runs if-up -a.
The changelog:
avahi (0.6.31-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Use recommended maintscript versioning scheme.
* The avahi-dnsconfd init script doesn't support reload but provides a
refresh action, so list that instead in the usage help message.
* Update ifupdown hooks for avahi-daemon and avahi-autoipd. Drop the usage
of ADDRFAM=NetworkManager, since network-manager no longer uses that. Run
avahi-daemon only for ADDRFAM inet and inet6. (Closes: #699749)
-- Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:58:55 +0100
Full debdiff attached.
Cheers,
Michael
unblock avahi/0.6.31-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-down avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-down
--- avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-down 2012-03-04 05:24:07.0 +0100
+++ avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-down 2013-03-06 23:04:59.0 +0100
@@ -13,12 +13,12 @@
[ $IFACE != lo ] || exit 0
case $ADDRFAM in
- inet|NetworkManager) ;;
- *) exit 0
+ inet) ;;
+ *) exit 0 ;;
esac
case $METHOD in
static|dhcp|NetworkManager) ;;
- *) exit 0
+ *) exit 0 ;;
esac
if [ -x /bin/ip ]; then
diff -Nru avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-up avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-up
--- avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-up 2012-03-04 05:24:07.0 +0100
+++ avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.if-up 2013-03-06 23:04:59.0 +0100
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
[ $IFACE != lo ] || exit 0
case $ADDRFAM in
- inet|NetworkManager) ;;
- *) exit 0
+ inet) ;;
+ *) exit 0 ;;
esac
case $METHOD in
static|dhcp|NetworkManager) ;;
- *) exit 0
+ *) exit 0 ;;
esac
diff -Nru avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.maintscript avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.maintscript
--- avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.maintscript 2012-03-04 05:24:07.0 +0100
+++ avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-autoipd.maintscript 2013-03-06 23:04:59.0 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-mv_conffile /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/avahi-autoipd /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/avahi-autoipd 0.6.25-3 avahi-autoipd
-mv_conffile /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/zzz_avahi-autoipd /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/zzz_avahi-autoipd 0.6.25-3 avahi-autoipd
+mv_conffile /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/avahi-autoipd /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/avahi-autoipd 0.6.25-4~ avahi-autoipd
+mv_conffile /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/zzz_avahi-autoipd /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/zzz_avahi-autoipd 0.6.25-4~ avahi-autoipd
diff -Nru avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-daemon.if-up avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-daemon.if-up
--- avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-daemon.if-up 2012-03-04 05:24:07.0 +0100
+++ avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-daemon.if-up 2013-03-06 23:04:59.0 +0100
@@ -4,9 +4,13 @@
# the loopback device; it's not necessary until we bring up a real network
# device
[ $IFACE != lo ] || exit 0
+case $ADDRFAM in
+ inet|inet6) ;;
+ *) exit 0 ;;
+esac
# If we have an unicast .local domain, we immediately disable avahi to avoid
# conflicts with the multicast IP4LL .local domain
if [ -x /usr/lib/avahi/avahi-daemon-check-dns.sh ] ; then
- exec /usr/lib/avahi/avahi-daemon-check-dns.sh
+ exec /usr/lib/avahi/avahi-daemon-check-dns.sh
fi
diff -Nru avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-dnsconfd.init avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-dnsconfd.init
--- avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-dnsconfd.init 2012-03-04 05:24:07.0 +0100
+++ avahi-0.6.31/debian/avahi-dnsconfd.init 2013-03-06 23:04:59.0 +0100
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
d_status
;;
*)
-echo Usage: $SCRIPTNAME {start|stop|restart|force-reload|reload}
Bug#703257: RM: libnet-twitter-lite-perl/0.11002-1
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please consider removing libnet-twitter-lite-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702523), which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency tircd. Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mon16kuebutmiiyvdsikz3n4tosa9hafjcapn9atb8...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#703258: RM: libnet-twitter-perl/3.18003-1
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please consider removing libnet-twitter-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702486, which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency webgui. Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MNcFi7ULbET1pA=oeobd_v8hhg6wf4_a6ybe1fhykn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Fixing lucky 13 CVE-2013-0169 in gnutls28
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 16:00:29 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2013-02-23 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: The plan seems ok to me in general. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 18:37:12 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: +# workaround for guile testsuite failure. +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),armel armhf mipsel)) + DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --disable-largefile +endif + Disabling lfs because of guile sounds fairly bad though, assuming this is what this does... As you do not ssem to be convinced, how about plan B: 1. Upload proposed packages. 2. If armel armhf mipsel break due to --disable-largefile stop using --disable-largefile there and stop providing guile-gnutls on these archs. OK I think I'm confused. How would you detect breakage due to disable-largefile? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#702746: release.debian.org: pre-approval: libguestfs 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2
Hi, I've just installed 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2 on jenkins.d.n, soon we will know whether this fix is really working as expected. I assume yes, so I will only send another reply to 702746 if it turns out not to. cheers thanks for fixing this, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303171121.06319.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: Fixing lucky 13 CVE-2013-0169 in gnutls28
On 2013-03-17 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 16:00:29 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] 2. If armel armhf mipsel break due to --disable-largefile stop using --disable-largefile there and stop providing guile-gnutls on these archs. OK I think I'm confused. How would you detect breakage due to disable-largefile? bug-report -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317182610.gd3...@downhill.g.la
Bug#700194: marked as done (unblock: python3-defaults/3.2.3-6)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:29:47 +0100 with message-id 20130317182947.gt5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#700194: unblock: python3-defaults/3.2.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #700194, regarding unblock: python3-defaults/3.2.3-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 700194: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package python3-defaults First, apologies for this late unblock request. I'd been focused on getting python2.7/python-defaults updated and thought one of my co-maintainers had taken care of this already. Changelog below is annotated with why I think this should be unblocked. python3-defaults (3.2.3-6) unstable; urgency=low [ Piotr Ożarowski ] * dh_python3 - ignore empty files while trying to normalize shebangs This fixed build failures, so there are likely packages that built since this was uploaded to Sid that won't build in Wheezy. - mention the right file (debian/py3dist-overrides) while warning about guessed dependency - thanks to Sebastian Ramacher for the patch (Closes: #685067) Trivial documentation fix. Not critical, but good to have and certainly not worth a TPU upload to avoid. - fix generating dependencies when maximum version is specified (Closes: #687060) This fixed build failures, so there are likely packages that built since this was uploaded to Sid that won't build in Wheezy. * py3versions.py: fix parsing DEBPYTHON3_SUPPORTED env. variable (versions should be separated using comma, as in debian_defaults config file) This is similar to the change that was just part of the python-defaults unblock. It's here for tests. There are packages that use the env variable, but all maintained by p1otr and he'd checked they work with this change. To stay in line with the way pyversions.py will work in Wheezy, this should go in. * py3versions, debpython: close previously opened files - thanks to Dmitry Shachnev for the patch (Closes: #686587) This is a bug. Not critical, but not worth a TPU upload to avoid. [ Dmitry Shachnev ] [ Barry Warsaw ] * py3clean: Don't remove everything in the __pycache__ directory for system site package directories. Prevents bogus cleaning of unrelated *.pyc files. Original patch by Dmitry, with review, clean up, small modifications, and additional comments by Barry. (Closes: #685167) This is a significant bug that should be fixed. [ Barry Warsaw ] * dh_python3: Rework calculation of extension tags to add support for Python 3.3's different suffixes, and to allow for unadorned .so files to assume they are built with the default Python 3 version. Closes: 672178 This is not essential for Wheezy, but will make working with python3.3 much easier for people that want to do it. I think it's worth making the change to make Wheezy a better platform for Python 3 development. * README.derivatives: It is no longer necessary to edit debian/py3versions.py since the values are taken from debian_defaults. Also added some text on how to separate the specification when multiple versions are supported. * Makefile: Fix the nosetests3 command. Closes: 690259 These don't directly impact the way the package works and are nice to have. Not worth uploading to TPU to avoid. -- Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:29:45 +0200 This has been in Sid for several months without issue. At this point the risks of not including it (because packages have built against it) is, in my opinion, greater than the risk of including it. unblock python3-defaults/3.2.3-6 diff -Nru python3-defaults-3.2.3/debian/changelog python3-defaults-3.2.3/debian/changelog --- python3-defaults-3.2.3/debian/changelog 2012-08-02 17:54:48.0 -0400 +++ python3-defaults-3.2.3/debian/changelog 2012-10-21 15:29:47.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,39 @@ +python3-defaults (3.2.3-6) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Piotr Ożarowski ] + * dh_python3 +- ignore empty files while trying to normalize shebangs +- mention the right file (debian/py3dist-overrides) while warning about + guessed dependency - thanks to Sebastian Ramacher for the patch + (Closes: #685067) +- fix generating dependencies when maximum version is specified + (Closes: #687060) + * py3versions.py: fix parsing DEBPYTHON3_SUPPORTED env. variable +
Re: Bug#696757: ecl: FTBFS: hang in sigsuspend
Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Would it be an option to configure ecl with --enable-threads=no on kfreebsd-* and hurd-* for wheezy? Would any functionality be lost or would it only affect performance? The version in squeeze didn't have threads enabled, and there don't seem to be any rdepends in wheezy? Doing so (with attached patch to enable-threads only on Linux) results in successful builds for me. I don't really see me finding a different solution to this. I'll probably just upload your patch. Thanks Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wqt53mcn@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 01.03.2013 04:35, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff: Backporting security fixes with Java has turned out to be more of less unfeasible. I tried this once with DSA 2507 and I think that amounted to at least two man days of work for that update alone. Also, Ubuntu has shipped backports to all suites in USN-1724 and AFAICS the world hasn't stopped. After all, everyone using Oracle Java will be exposed to the same behaviourial changes. So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the future. will that be in backports, stable updates, or security? Via stable-security (i.e. DSAs). If Matthias keeps the Debian/Ubuntu packaging in a state that it's easily buildable on squeeze/wheezy for ojdk6 and for wheezy on ojdk7 I think we should be able to handle Java updates resource-wise. I do not intend to break that intentionally. Some back-porting may show some issues, like patches not updated for older releases. There is a chance to break zero on some architectures, however if you feel that might become an issue, just disable zero for powerpc, ppc64, s390, s390x, as done for mips/mipsel. The hotspot port for sparc/sparc64 seems to work currently, so your call how to maintain it for wheezy. Based on that and the below, it sounds like zero is troublesome, so it should be disabled. I'm not familiar with the Java internals, but if we're following that approach it would make sense to upgrade Wheezy to the version in experimental (i.e. 7u15 instead of 7u3). I won't upload this myself. IcedTea 7-2.3 uses two hotspot versions, one for the zero ports, one for the hotspot runtimes. From my point of view it would be good to update to a 7-2.[45] with a unified hotspot version capable to build both zero and hotspot, and keep the current 7-2.1.x for now. It looks like icedtea is currently at 1.3.1 and you want to bump it to a 2.x version? I don't think the release team will like that very much. Do you have any ideas on a solution that gets to openjdk 7u15 while sticking with icedtea 1.3.1? Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mnwpa6jwriyeykd_a4ja6fyajzjw9-9guwird6+yey...@mail.gmail.com
Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze
I won't upload this myself. IcedTea 7-2.3 uses two hotspot versions, one for the zero ports, one for the hotspot runtimes. From my point of view it would be good to update to a 7-2.[45] with a unified hotspot version capable to build both zero and hotspot, and keep the current 7-2.1.x for now. It looks like icedtea is currently at 1.3.1 and you want to bump it to a 2.x version? I don't think the release team will like that very much. Do you have any ideas on a solution that gets to openjdk 7u15 while sticking with icedtea 1.3.1? Nevermind, so you're refering to icedtea, which is part of the openjdk source, not icedtea-web. Since that is part of the source package, you're certainly free to choose whichever version you think best. Would you mind doing that and uploading your choice to unstable? Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpvfry4zpexmx+pqi0hdhn5h1-3bps86bxbaccyke9...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#703267: RM: rinputd/1.0.5-2
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please remove rinputd. It fails to install (#581999) and has no reverse-dependencies. Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MP9KGxjt4gLkjssSNsmuVRU4pTkgZmwMru6=fkdqcv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#703267: marked as done (RM: rinputd/1.0.5-2)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:16:30 + with message-id 20130317201630.go4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#703267: RM: rinputd/1.0.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #703267, regarding RM: rinputd/1.0.5-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 703267: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703267 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please remove rinputd. It fails to install (#581999) and has no reverse-dependencies. Thanks, Mike ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 04:07:15PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please remove rinputd. It fails to install (#581999) and has no reverse-dependencies. Removal is already scheduled, which I thought I made fairly clear in my message to that bug. In fact rinputd would have been removed this morning if I hadn't confused britney. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#703270: RM: tcos/0.89.90
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please remove tcos (RC bug #694870). It has no reverse-dependencies and has yet to be included in a stable release. Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MPxCDgVk7X5d7=wnbhFiO17qCU+JqiG7P2S=JeHF=5...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#703257: RM: libnet-twitter-lite-perl/0.11002-1
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:07:37PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please consider removing libnet-twitter-lite-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702523), which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency tircd. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:10:03PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please consider removing libnet-twitter-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702486, which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency webgui. I don't see any indication of you discussing this with the maintainers of libnet-twitter-* or their reverse dependencies? I do not like this pattern of unannounced removal requests without consulting maintainers. In these two cases I probably agree with the intention, but not with the way you are going about it. I also really dislike your recent habit of making discussions hard to follow by opening new bugs. Please keep things in one place so everyone can follow along. NACK until the maintainers have chance to comment. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#703270: RM: tcos/0.89.90
Processing control commands: merge -1 699109 Bug #703270 [release.debian.org] RM: tcos/0.89.90 Bug #699109 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): initramfs-tools-tcos/0.89.91 Merged 699109 703270 -- 699109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699109 703270: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703270 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b703270.136355294729205.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#703270: RM: tcos/0.89.90
Control: merge -1 699109 On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 04:30:11PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please remove tcos (RC bug #694870). It has no reverse-dependencies and has yet to be included in a stable release. And again, the moving discussion for no reason. Please stop wasting good people's time. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#702486: libnet-twitter-perl: version 4.x required for new Twitter API
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:49:56PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Control: clone 702486 -1 Control: reassign -1 libnet-twitter-lite-perl Control: retitle -1 libnet-twitter-perl: needs update for new Twitter API On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:28:50AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Package: libnet-twitter-perl Severity: grave Let's turn this into a proper bug report: Patrick Brewer pwbre...@me.com writes: For those using Net:Twitter the latest version of the lib is needed ASAP. Twitter is turning off their old API sometime this month (official date was yesterday). A version of the module in 4.x is required for the new API. The very latest I can find for debian is 3.18003 here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libnet-twitter-perl Cloning this for libnet-twitter-lite-perl as support for Twitter API 1.1 was also only introduced in Net::Twitter::Lite in 0.12000 2013-03-04 - URI encode POSTDATA to match Twitter's more stringent (non-standard) requirements - created Net::Twitter::Lite::WithAPIv1_1 for Twitter API v1.1 support This is now fixed for libnet-twitter-lite-perl in experimental. Release team: the old API from twitter is very close to going away; https://dev.twitter.com/blog/api-v1-retirement-update and new upstream releases of both Net::Twitter and Net::Twitter::Lite are needed to allow continued usage of these modules. The upstream diffs are quite large: https://metacpan.org/diff/release/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-Lite-0.11002/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-Lite-0.12000 https://metacpan.org/diff/release/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-3.18003/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-4.3 but the alternative is probably removing both from wheezy (and squeeze). FWIW, there's a (somewhat sloppy, to be tidied up) backport of Net::Twitter::Lite 0.11002 for squeeze at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libnet-twitter-lite-perl.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental-squeeze Thoughts: new upstream releases; remove; something else? Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317202551.go4...@urchin.earth.li
Bug#703257: Bug#702486: Bug#703257: RM: libnet-twitter-lite-perl/0.11002-1
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:38:39 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:07:37PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please consider removing libnet-twitter-lite-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702523), which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency tircd. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:10:03PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please consider removing libnet-twitter-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702486, which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency webgui. webgui is not in wheezy and therefore unaffected by a potential removal of libnet-twitter-perl from testing. I don't see any indication of you discussing this with the maintainers of libnet-twitter-* or their reverse dependencies? Thanks Jonathan for putting us in the loop! I had indeed not seen the those 2 new bugs. NACK until the maintainers have chance to comment. Dominic has looked at the packages this afternoon, maybe he can summarise this opinion. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Sinéad O'Connor: Never Get Old signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#703257: RM: libnet-twitter-lite-perl/0.11002-1
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: I do not like this pattern of unannounced removal requests without consulting maintainers. In these two cases I probably agree with the intention, but not with the way you are going about it. I also really dislike your recent habit of making discussions hard to follow by opening new bugs. Please keep things in one place so everyone can follow along. I fail to follow this line of reasoning. Does the bts not make everything more nice and tidy? Instead of discussions about removals taking place in bug reports, and stagnating, the bts has a nice tidy section on those. Anyway, RM bugs are just like any other bug: they're only suggestions. That's why I often say please consider. The release team is of course going to investigate (i.e. talk to maintainers if needed) before jumping the gun and ticking people off. I've also found that RM bugs often light fires under people, resulting in problems solved faster. So, that's all positive (except for the maintainers that don't react). Package removals are a healthy part of the release process. Let's not slow that down. NACK until the maintainers have chance to comment. Completely understandable. I knew that would be part of the process. Thanks for the feedback. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mmg-ajfft2wuxizw2ojyjen6pvxk0terqumvt+4pnj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: courteous and measured removal requests
Dropping the packages and bugs, they are not relevant to this discussion. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:49:26PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: I do not like this pattern of unannounced removal requests without consulting maintainers. In these two cases I probably agree with the intention, but not with the way you are going about it. I also really dislike your recent habit of making discussions hard to follow by opening new bugs. Please keep things in one place so everyone can follow along. I fail to follow this line of reasoning. Does the bts not make everything more nice and tidy? Instead of discussions about removals taking place in bug reports, and stagnating, the bts has a nice tidy section on those. Mails to bugs in packages go to the maintainers. Mails to RM bugs go to the release team, unless you take special steps (which you seem not to do). I see no value in having a discussion about removal completely separate from the discussion about the RC bug causing it. Anyway, RM bugs are just like any other bug: they're only suggestions. That's why I often say please consider. The release team is of course going to investigate (i.e. talk to maintainers if needed) before jumping the gun and ticking people off. I've also found that RM bugs often light fires under people, resulting in problems solved faster. So, that's all positive (except for the maintainers that don't react). Well yes, if the maintainer ever sees the fire. Package removals are a healthy part of the release process. Let's not slow that down. Package removals should be done, where possible, in discussion with the maintainers and with their sanction. Pulling packages from under people's feet, especially where in some recent cases there has actually been recent activity on the bug, is rude and causes friction. NACK until the maintainers have chance to comment. Completely understandable. I knew that would be part of the process. I would much rather you talked directly to the maintainers and came to a consensus first, than waste release team time doing that bit for you. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1
Hi Jonathan On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 03:19:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 + pending On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi all I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload? Regards, Salvatore Please go ahead. Thank you, just uploaded. Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317221249.GA22829@elende
Processed: retitle 688321 to unblock: quota/4.00-4+deb7u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 688321 unblock: quota/4.00-4+deb7u1 Bug #688321 [release.debian.org] unblock: quota/4.01-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: quota/4.00-4+deb7u1' from 'unblock: quota/4.01-1' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688321 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136355917415323.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#703257: Bug#702523: Bug#702486: Bug#703257: RM: libnet-twitter-lite-perl/0.11002-1
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:26:37PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:38:39 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:07:37PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please consider removing libnet-twitter-lite-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702523), which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency tircd. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:10:03PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please consider removing libnet-twitter-perl. The current twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase (bug #702486, which are likely unacceptable at this point in the freeze. Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency webgui. webgui is not in wheezy and therefore unaffected by a potential removal of libnet-twitter-perl from testing. I don't see any indication of you discussing this with the maintainers of libnet-twitter-* or their reverse dependencies? Thanks Jonathan for putting us in the loop! I had indeed not seen the those 2 new bugs. Ditto to both. NACK until the maintainers have chance to comment. Dominic has looked at the packages this afternoon, maybe he can summarise this opinion. I don't think I have much more to add beyond my message at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702486#36. It would of course be a shame if libnet-twitter-*perl were removed from wheezy, but understandable. From my packaging work of libnet-twitter-list-perl today, I can say that the changes are actually not as large as they first appear; much of the changeset is noise due to refactoring (to support the new API cleanly). If it was earlier on in the freeze process, I'd be arguing more strongly for pushing this into wheezy. The main significant change is in Net/Twitter/Lite.pm itself: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libnet-twitter-lite-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=3029a124dc76aba3d3f9eb02e9a98f690652bb3d#patch25 -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317223909.gq4...@urchin.earth.li
Bug#703238: unblock: remmina/1.0.0-4+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Uploaded, thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADk7b0NbTiCb9ow5R5Xy4acSryEKRBx+2AFOBj-JJk5J0i=e...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#703241: Acknowledgement (unblock: intel-microcode/1.20130222.1)
diffstat from debdiff: changelog |4 debian/changelog | 10 microcode-20120606.v2.dat |31086 -- microcode-20130222.dat|31086 ++ 4 files changed, 31100 insertions(+), 31086 deletions(-) Diff (excluding the microcode*.dat changes): diff -Nru intel-microcode-1.20120606.v2.2/changelog intel-microcode-1.20130222.1/changelog --- intel-microcode-1.20120606.v2.2/changelog 2012-10-08 20:57:05.0 -0300 +++ intel-microcode-1.20130222.1/changelog 2013-03-03 19:20:03.0 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2013-02-22: + * Updated Microcodes: +sig 0x000306a9, pf mask 0x12, 2013-01-09, rev 0x0017, size 11264 + 2012-06-06-v2 (2012-10-01): * Updated Microcodes: sig 0x000206d6, pf mask 0x6d, 2012-05-22, rev 0x0619, size 16384 diff -Nru intel-microcode-1.20120606.v2.2/debian/changelog intel-microcode-1.20130222.1/debian/changelog --- intel-microcode-1.20120606.v2.2/debian/changelog2012-10-09 08:01:08.0 -0300 +++ intel-microcode-1.20130222.1/debian/changelog 2013-03-03 19:20:03.0 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +intel-microcode (1.20130222.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream microcode data file 20130222 (closes: #702152) ++ Updated Microcodes: +sig 0x000306a9, pf mask 0x12, 2013-01-09, rev 0x0017, size 11264 + * Remove from the source package an unused microcode data file, which +was completely superseded by later ones: microcode-20120606-v2.dat + + -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:59:35 -0300 + intel-microcode (1.20120606.v2.2) unstable; urgency=medium * initramfs: work around initramfs-tools bug #688794. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130318004838.gb18...@khazad-dum.debian.net
