Re: Bug#753542: Bug#753444: Bug#753542: perl-base - Segfaults in libperl.so.5.18
On 07/07/14 10:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 07/07/14 09:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 07:15:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That said, feel free to upload perl now. It has been uploaded, and is now installed on all s390x buildds. Thanks. I have scheduled a bunch of binNMUs. I scheduled all of them, and there are a few failures: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perlapi-5.18.2d-s390x.html However the main blocker right now is the perl/mips FTBFS. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bba112.5070...@debian.org
Bug#753079: transition: librime
On 03/07/14 21:36, Guo Yixuan wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com I will upload new git head when prompted. Is it ready? Yes, it is. (I just noticed you already uploaded it. Thanks a lot!) And it has failed on armel because of #727621. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bba2cf.7080...@debian.org
Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Everything else looks good, so please go ahead. Thanks; gnustep-base and -gui are now built and installed on all architectures. Please schedule the binNMUs at your earliest convenience. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87k37oi8og.GNUs_not_UNIX!%ya...@gnu.org
Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
On 08/07/14 09:58, Yavor Doganov wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Everything else looks good, so please go ahead. Thanks; gnustep-base and -gui are now built and installed on all architectures. Please schedule the binNMUs at your earliest convenience. I have scheduled the first round, will schedule the rest later. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bba993.9040...@debian.org
Bug#753444: Bug#753542: Bug#753444: Bug#753542: perl-base - Segfaults in libperl.so.5.18
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perlapi-5.18.2d-s390x.html However the main blocker right now is the perl/mips FTBFS. For the record, I'm aware of this but it's currently difficult to find the time. The quick fix is probably to build with gcc-4.8 on mips or something like that. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140708091457.GA11952@estella.local.invalid
Re: [SUA 60-1] Upcoming Debian 7 Update (7.6)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 07/07/2014 18:01, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : Testing and feedback would be appreciated. I administrate a few servers and desktops under Wheezy with p-u enable, and haven’t notice any regression. Among other, the packages used on these boxes are apache2, apt-cacher-ng, clamav, linux, openssh, openssl. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTu9ESAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08Zl0IAJxFLqqJLk/h0ztxHkYvQMd1 +EUT/rnR8OkkLTCmKNGSl03jm7ntYmo9gN27HcyaBNIdgTyE6rlIZLjrnXs2Xxm5 juXpJH8NRKDc2N/dXH4a7gb42CxZrfZ0Az90dnzBPFv+8+m55esPi/AXSNFr+1wa 39J1vRcqKJD5wylxESoaT+zpR/r+Yk6oIrZDpAgo4tYH353fo6L/7+n6tjUqWq9+ 3cm0OCLTjvBYGPFfNiabPbIQ2nZJ+Qab4OHAiF1ZsUaOKuDcPe5BS7cyheYW9SEh 0Nm/uSNUQMLlpucBrI/wPFDrCd8cicktiZ3gqEalcT11hcpZUgc0jcbqVVa8kDA= =tWNZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bbd112.8020...@tilapin.org
Re: lua jessie
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:11:08 +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 12:24:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: So the thing is, having liblua5.1 and liblua5.2 share symbols is a recipe for trouble. There's a number of other libraries using each of them, and there's as far as I can tell nothing preventing a program from using two of those libs, linked against different liblua5.x versions, and exploding at runtime. So if we want to keep shipping several liblua versions, they need to be made safe against this kind of issues, IMO. You are right, I did not think about that. AFAIK Lua 5.2 should detect a double runtime and give a decent assertion failure message. The upstreams did take care of that. But I guess you would prefer a link time error, or simply have a disjoint symbol set. I can make the point on the Lua mailing list, and suggest to have symbols named like lua51_foo instead of lua_foo and have #define lua_foo lua51_foo. Assuming they listen to me, this won't happen before 5.3. Another way to achieve this is ELF symbol versioning. So instead of each lib exporting lua_foo@Base, there would be lua_foo@lua_51, lua_foo@lua_52, lua_foo@lua_53, etc. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#753781: transition: xserver 1.16
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 753781 + confirmed pending Bug #753781 [release.debian.org] transition: xserver 1.16 Added tag(s) confirmed and pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 753781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14048350033559.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
On 08/07/14 10:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 08/07/14 09:58, Yavor Doganov wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Everything else looks good, so please go ahead. Thanks; gnustep-base and -gui are now built and installed on all architectures. Please schedule the binNMUs at your earliest convenience. I have scheduled the first round, will schedule the rest later. Looks like meson and uwsgi build depend on gnustep but don't link to it. So most likely they don't need it and the build dependency could be dropped. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bc19e0.20...@debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 673538 pending Bug #673538 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base 1.24, gnustep-gui 0.22 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673538 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140483644813613.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: librime: FTBFS on armel: std::future is broken
Processing control commands: block 753079 by -1 Bug #753079 [release.debian.org] transition: librime 753079 was not blocked by any bugs. 753079 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 753079: 754199 -- 753079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753079 754199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754199 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.140483671215570.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#753079: transition: librime
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 753079 confirmed pending Bug #753079 [release.debian.org] transition: librime Added tag(s) confirmed and pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 753079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753079 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140483680616671.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Looks like meson and uwsgi build depend on gnustep but don't link to it. So most likely they don't need it and the build dependency could be dropped. Well, meson is a build system, there could be legitimate reasons for the build-dependency (determining compiler flags, etc.). It can't link anyway as it is an arch:all package written in Python. For uwsgi, I think it is a bug that it doesn't link with the GNUstep libraries, see #753724. BTW, I'm curious why were gnustep-back and openvpn-auth-ldap binNMUed? That was unnecessary. Probably due to some automated setup. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87ion7izeo.GNUs_not_UNIX!%ya...@gnu.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x4yyf-0003mg...@franck.debian.org
Re: dropping libtiff4-dev transitional package
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 23/06/14 21:20, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: There are 27 packages (including 1 pending upload) left that still have build dependencies on libtiff4-dev: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libtiff4-dev;users=q...@debian.org At this point, I'd like to go ahead and remove libtiff4-dev and change these to serious since they will be FTBFS. I'm thinking most people will probably fix their packages soon after this, and I can work on NMUs for the rest after a little more time. I think we should act soon if we want go get the libtiff4-dev transitional out of the archive before jessie. Any objections? Sounds good to me. Cheers, Emilio Does it need a hint to transition to jessie? tiff-4.0.3-10 is not going because of the (intentional) disappearance of binary package libtiff4-dev. -- Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140708135452.3193645226.qww314...@jberkenbilt-linux.appiancorp.com
Re: dropping libtiff4-dev transitional package
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 13:54:56 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: Does it need a hint to transition to jessie? tiff-4.0.3-10 is not going because of the (intentional) disappearance of binary package libtiff4-dev. libtiff4-dev will be removed by ftpmaster once it no longer has any rdeps in sid. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#753310: opu: ia32-libs/20140630 ia32-libs-gtk/20140630
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 13:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2014-06-30 12:56, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: In preparation of the upcoming Squeeze point release I've prepared updated versions of ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk, as usual. The changelogs are below. Is it ok to upload? Yes, please go ahead; thanks. I've flagged ia32-libs for acceptance; thanks. Unfortunately, something appears to have gone wrong with the ia32-libs-gtk upload and I've flagged that one for rejection. Specifically, the entire debdiff is: /tmp/I6ag5xy7fg/ia32-libs-gtk-20140630/debian/.changelog.swp |binary ia32-libs-gtk-20140630/debian/changelog |2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Binary files /tmp/ACH0kJdpAp/ia32-libs-gtk-20140131/debian/.changelog.swp and /tmp/I6ag5xy7fg/ia32-libs-gtk-20140630/debian/.changelog.swp differ diff -Nru ia32-libs-gtk-20140131/debian/changelog ia32-libs-gtk-20140630/debian/changelog --- ia32-libs-gtk-20140131/debian/changelog 2014-01-31 10:19:56.0 + +++ ia32-libs-gtk-20140630/debian/changelog 2014-06-30 11:51:29.0 + @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -ia32-libs-gtk (20140131) squeeze-proposed-updates; urgency=low +ia32-libs-gtk (20140630) squeeze-proposed-updates; urgency=low * Packages updated Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404845528.2657.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#740909: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze6
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 16:42 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: With your permission I'd like to upload the following update to Zabbix in oldstable: zabbix (1:1.8.2-1squeeze6) oldstable-proposed-updates; urgency=high * CVE-2013-6824: (ZBX-7479) fixed command injection vulnerability in Agent. * CVE-2014-1682: (ZBX-7703) fixed vulnerability allowing to impersonate other users without proper credentials when using HTTP authentication (Closes: #737818). Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. We've also had a request to remove zabbix from squeeze, as it won't be supported in squeeze-lts (#753503). We can't do both in the same point release and the upcoming one will be the final point release for squeeze. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404845819.2657.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze6
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #753503 [release.debian.org] RM: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 753503: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753503 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b753503.140484582712059.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze6
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #740909 [release.debian.org] opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze6 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 740909: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740909 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b740909.140484582712050.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#753503: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze6
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:56:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 16:42 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: With your permission I'd like to upload the following update to Zabbix in oldstable: zabbix (1:1.8.2-1squeeze6) oldstable-proposed-updates; urgency=high * CVE-2013-6824: (ZBX-7479) fixed command injection vulnerability in Agent. * CVE-2014-1682: (ZBX-7703) fixed vulnerability allowing to impersonate other users without proper credentials when using HTTP authentication (Closes: #737818). Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. We've also had a request to remove zabbix from squeeze, as it won't be supported in squeeze-lts (#753503). We can't do both in the same point release and the upcoming one will be the final point release for squeeze. If the Zabbix maintainers want to take care of Zabbix in squeeze-lts we can keep it. It should be noted that many more issues are unfixed in squeeze, so I'm still in favour of removal: CVE-2011-2904 vulnerable fixed fixed Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in acknow.php in Zabbix ... CVE-2011-4615 vulnerable fixed fixed Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Zabbix before ... CVE-2011-4674 vulnerable fixed fixed SQL injection vulnerability in popup.php in Zabbix 1.8.3 and 1.8.4, ... CVE-2011-5027 vulnerable fixed fixed Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ZABBIX before 1.8.10 ... CVE-2012-6086 vulnerable fixed fixed libs/zbxmedia/eztexting.c in Zabbix 1.8.x before 1.8.18rc1, 2.0.x .. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140708184528.ga17...@inutil.org
Bug#678818: marked as done (release.debian.org: pu: package bacula/5.0.2+dfsg-0+squeeze1)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jul 2014 20:00:27 +0100 with message-id 1404846027.2657.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#678818: release.debian.org: pu: package bacula/5.0.2+dfsg-0+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #678818, regarding release.debian.org: pu: package bacula/5.0.2+dfsg-0+squeeze1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: l...@pca.it Usertags: debian-packaging User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi there! The latest Bacula upload (5.2.6+dfsg-1) fixed #658326, a bug about sources not being DFSG-free. Given that the bug was reported against squeeze, I prepared an updated squeeze source package, debdiff attached. The binary packages available at the APT repository below have been successfully tested on three different machines (one director and two File Daemon clients) and two different architectures (amd64 and i386): = $ sudo cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/people.debian.org_gismo.list # http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2009/04/howto:_uploading_to_people.d.o_using_dput/ deb http://people.debian.org/~gismo/debian gismo-squeeze-proposed-updates/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~gismo/debian gismo-squeeze-proposed-updates/ $ sudo wget -O /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/luca.pca.it-keyring.gpg \ http://people.debian.org/~gismo/debian/luca.pca.it-keyring.gpg $ sudo apt-get -t gismo-squeeze-proposed-updates $DEB = Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diffstat for bacula-5.0.2 bacula-5.0.2+dfsg debian/README.Debian| 21 debian/changelog| 16 debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch | 64 ++ debian/rules|7 src/lib/sha1.c | 510 src/lib/sha1.h | 107 6 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 618 deletions(-) diff -Nru bacula-5.0.2/debian/changelog bacula-5.0.2+dfsg/debian/changelog --- bacula-5.0.2/debian/changelog 2012-06-15 23:41:26.0 +0200 +++ bacula-5.0.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-15 23:41:27.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +bacula (5.0.2+dfsg-0+squeeze1) squeeze-proposed-updates; urgency=high + + [ Alexander Golovko ] + * debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch +(Closes: #658326): ++ switch from upstream nonfree SHA1 implementation to openssl + + [ Luca Capello ] + * Urgency set to high because of a serious bug. + * debian/README.Debian: ++ explain why upstream sources are not DFSG-free. + * debian/rules: ++ apply/unapply Alexander's patch. + + -- Luca Capello l...@pca.it Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:58:30 +0200 + bacula (5.0.2-2.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru bacula-5.0.2/debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch bacula-5.0.2+dfsg/debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch --- bacula-5.0.2/debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ bacula-5.0.2+dfsg/debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch 2012-06-15 23:41:27.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +Description: Switch from non-free SHA1 implementation to openssl +Bug-Debian: 658326 +Bug: http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1869 +Origin: Debian, commit:6c562cfdaffd730c796518233f0d97da08a3891b +Author: Alexander Golovko alexan...@ankalagon.ru +Reviewed-by: Luca Capello l...@pca.it +Last-Update: 2012-06-15 + +diff -Nur a/src/lib/lib.h bacula-5.0.2/src/lib/lib.h +--- a/src/lib/lib.h 2010-04-27 21:58:29.0 +0200 b/src/lib/lib.h 2012-06-15 19:55:53.240076133 +0200 +@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ + #include fnmatch.h + #endif + #include md5.h +-#include sha1.h ++#include openssl/sha.h + #include tree.h + #include watchdog.h + #include btimers.h +diff -Nur a/src/lib/Makefile.in bacula-5.0.2/src/lib/Makefile.in +--- a/src/lib/Makefile.in 2010-04-27 21:58:29.0 +0200 b/src/lib/Makefile.in 2012-06-15 21:11:56.429692604 +0200 +@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ + fnmatch.h guid_to_name.h htable.h lex.h \ + lib.h md5.h mem_pool.h message.h openssl.h \ +
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20140630_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x4aqy-0001ah...@franck.debian.org
Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 14:33 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 16:18 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-08-19): Any news there? (Yes, I realise there's a certain irony...) (Time for the irony to strike back.) Ping? This got preempted by other things --- sorry about that. I should be able to prepare and re-test the upload some time in the next few days. Any news on that? (The window for 6.0.9 closes during this weekend.) We're now about to hit the window for 6.0.10, which will be the final point release for squeeze. I think it's too late to get larger changes into squeeze at this point, I'm afraid. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404846149.2657.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#699591: exim4 upload to stable (dovecot stability / and optionally spf quoting)
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 14:58 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2013-02-17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this. no worries. and very much so again. :-( On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:34 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: | Dovecot: robustness; better msg on missing mech. [...] This fixes an exim segfault when accessing a malicious dovecot AUTH server. I have already talked with the security team, Moritz agrees that this should be fixed in a point release. Testing already has the fix since 4.80-6. The patch includes TESTED: works against Dovecot 2.1.10, but stable has 1.2.15. Do we know if the patch has been tested against stable? Hello, I have just setup a test system in my squeeze chroot, using dovecot with passdb passwd-file as authentication source. It worked for me. I have tried AUTH PLAIN, CRAM-MD5 and DIGEST-MD5. However I do not know whether any systematic testing was done. On top of this I would like to discuss whether it is acceptable to fix http://bugs.debian.org/697057 in stable, too. [ I definitily want o get the fix into testing - #697444.] The Debian configuration optionally allows to use spfquery to run SPF-checks on incoming mail. Due to insufficient quoting it is possible to pass on arbitrary arguments to spfquery and therefore bypass SPF checks. The fix is not invasive, but it changes dpkg conffiles. We're now within a few days of closing uploads for the final point release of squeeze. Is this still something you'd like to fix there? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404846306.2657.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 678624 = squeeze wontfix Bug #678624 [release.debian.org] pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3 Added tag(s) wontfix; removed tag(s) moreinfo. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140484666817906.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#678624: marked as done (pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:10:59 -0700 with message-id 20140708191059.gc12...@google.com and subject line Re: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #678624, regarding pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: squeeze Hi, A few bugs have accumulated in xz-utils since squeeze was released. First, a packaging bug: - All compression functions are missing from the static library. (bug#673001) Upstream bugfixes (taken from the upstream 5.0 branch): - The decompression example in liblzma-dev/doc/examples/ does not check that the last call to lzma_code() returns LZMA_STREAM_END and therefore mistakes a proper prefix of a valid XZ file for a valid XZ file. Hopefully others are not copying this bug. - API misuse (invalid integrity check type parameter) can produce invalid XZ files. - The single-call APIs lzma_easy_buffer_encode and lzma_stream_buffer_encode produce a compressed file when asked to compress a zero-length file that XZ Utils 5.0.1 and older cannot read. (Most callers use the multiple-call stateful API and are not affected, but for example python-lzma's lzma.compress uses the single-call API.) - liblzma, xz, and xzdec are unable to decompress the result of compressing a zero-length file with the single-call APIs from liblzma 5.0.2 and older. - If you are unlucky (buffer sizes lining up just right) during compression or decompression with BCJ filters, lzma_code() can return LZMA_BUF_ERROR even though it was possible to make progress. As a result, when BCJ filters are involved, the xz tool could produce Compressed data is corrupt or Unexpected end of input at inappropriate times. - lzma_stream_encoder() leaks about 100 bytes per call when the same stream object is used more than once. - lzma_index_init() segfaults for some malloc failures. - xz reads past the end of an on-stack array when using -v -v --list with certain malformed compressed files. The value read is a pointer which is then free()ed. - Due to a small shell scripting typo, xzegrep and xzfgrep act like xzgrep. - xzdiff foo.xz bar.xz clobbers the diff exit status and almost always returns status 0 whether the files differ or not. By contrast, xzdiff foo.xz bar and some other related commands work fine. (bug#635501) - xzgrep -q needle haystack.xz returns 2 (an error occured) instead of 0 when the needle is found early enough for the decompression process to be killed by SIGPIPE. Likewise for xzgrep needle haystack.xz when the uncompressed file is binary so grep exits early with Binary file %s matches. - The Czech translation refers to sparse files as backup files. (bug#605762) - The Italian translation refers to an unknown file format as a tipo di formato del file sconosciutoN. The bugs mentioned above are already fixed in 5.0.4 and in sid. I hope to fix them in squeeze, too. Diffstat excluding debian/patches: debian/changelog | 50 + debian/rules | 4 +- debian/source/include-binaries | 2 + debian/symbols | 8 +-- doc/examples/xz_pipe_decomp.c | 10 ++- po/cs.po | 6 +- po/it.po | 9 +-- src/liblzma/common/block_buffer_encoder.c | 18 +++-- src/liblzma/common/block_encoder.c | 5 ++ src/liblzma/common/index.c | 7 +- src/liblzma/common/stream_buffer_encoder.c | 23 -- src/liblzma/common/stream_encoder.c| 2 +- src/liblzma/lzma/lzma2_decoder.c | 8 +-- src/liblzma/simple/simple_coder.c | 2 +- src/scripts/xzdiff.in | 2 + src/scripts/xzgrep.in | 7 +- src/xz/list.c | 21 ++ tests/Makefile.am | 8 ++- tests/files/README | 8 +++ tests/files/bad-1-block_header-6.xz| Bin 0 - 72 bytes tests/files/good-1-lzma2-5.xz | Bin 0 - 52 bytes tests/test_bcj_exact_size.c| 112 + 22 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) Diffstat of debian/patches:
Bug#687761: pu: package lvm2/2.02.66-5+squeeze1
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 00:01 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Maybe we can revisit this for the next oldstable update. There was no feedback from the maintainers, but Pierre Ynard (the reporter of #543163) confirmed (see #687761) that he once had a working squeeze setup with lvm2 and no udev by removing the initscript dependency. (He is tracking unstable nowadays and needs/needed some more changes for getting modules loaded, but that's the price for not using udev - and seems to be due to his special hardware setup.) This change to the initscript won't change anything for existing squeeze installations - either they already have lvm2 + udev installed or manually changed the conffiles to allow lvm2 without udev. But it would simplify my work running (sometimes weird :-) upgrade tests to find interesting corner cases - lvm2 has a large rdep tree requiring a lot of workarounds ... The next oldstable update is now the final update for squeeze. Is this still an issue in practical terms? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404846957.2657.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: ia32-libs-gtk_20140630_amd64.changes REJECT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze18_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze19_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polarssl_1.2.9-1~deb6u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.8_1.8.7.302-2squeeze2_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:
Bug#638781: RM: libgtfb/0.1.0-1
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 08:32 +1000, Matt Flax wrote: Hi Adam, I have been contacted today by Alexander Zngerl for a keysigning next week when he comes to Sydney Australia. Have replied and am attempting to meet to sign keys Did anything happen there? The window for the final point release for squeeze closes over the coming weekend, so there's very little time to attempt to get a fix for this in now. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404847251.2657.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#707550: opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 14:35 +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: 2014/1/21 intrigeri intrig...@debian.org: Hi, Teodor, ping? I don't have the necessary experience to make this source debdiff. Thomas, are you still interested in uploading this (simple) patch for squeeze? We don't appear to have seen a reply to that, and we're now only a few days away from the final point release for squeeze. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404847334.2657.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: virtualbox: FTBFS with GCC 4.9 as default
Processing control commands: block 753781 by -1 Bug #753781 [release.debian.org] transition: xserver 1.16 753781 was blocked by: 753783 751082 753781 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 753781: 754220 -- 753781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753781 754220: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754220 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.140484755623378.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#725823: pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #725823 [release.debian.org] pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 725823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b725823.140484761224225.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#725823: pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 21:30 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: for the icedove version 3.0.x (and 3.1.x in squeeze-backport) released with squeeze are some similar bugs opened after the release of squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626812 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659301 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659994 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660736 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691985 Those bugs are all depened on undefined symbols that all happend after the libc version 2.11.3-x. That relay on the order icedove is reading the symbols from the varous libraries and theese libraries again from other libraries. So in the end a fix is basicly simply, icedove has to be started with the presetted variables LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD to be shure the symbols are readed in the correct order and icedove will start and work correctly. Apologies if I'm missing something, but why does this only affect the squeeze packages? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404847604.2657.20.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): xf86-video-msm: FTBFS against xserver 1.16
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 753781 by 754221 Bug #753781 [release.debian.org] transition: xserver 1.16 753781 was blocked by: 753783 754220 751082 753781 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 753781: 754221 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 753781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140484810426980.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#753310: opu: ia32-libs/20140630 ia32-libs-gtk/20140630
Op dinsdag 8 juli 2014 20:52:08 schreef Adam D. Barratt: Unfortunately, something appears to have gone wrong with the ia32-libs-gtk upload and I've flagged that one for rejection. Specifically, the entire debdiff is: Right, what went wrong is that there are 0 updates for ia32-libs-gtk since the last release and in my workflow I didn't expect that and created a borked update. Sorry for that - with the ia32-libs upload accepted we're done. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#753310: opu: ia32-libs/20140630 ia32-libs-gtk/20140630
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #753310 [release.debian.org] opu: ia32-libs/20140630 ia32-libs-gtk/20140630 Added tag(s) pending. -- 753310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753310 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b753310.14048548321636.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#753310: opu: ia32-libs/20140630 ia32-libs-gtk/20140630
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 21:43 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Op dinsdag 8 juli 2014 20:52:08 schreef Adam D. Barratt: Unfortunately, something appears to have gone wrong with the ia32-libs-gtk upload and I've flagged that one for rejection. Specifically, the entire debdiff is: Right, what went wrong is that there are 0 updates for ia32-libs-gtk since the last release and in my workflow I didn't expect that and created a borked update. Sorry for that - with the ia32-libs upload accepted we're done. Ah. :-) Thanks for the explanation. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404854820.5128.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#753079: transition: librime
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 03/07/14 21:36, Guo Yixuan wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com I will upload new git head when prompted. Is it ready? Yes, it is. (I just noticed you already uploaded it. Thanks a lot!) And it has failed on armel because of #727621. Thank you for noting this. It seems to be a rather difficult bug in gcc. Yixuan
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20140630_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x4dwa-0006t2...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-2+deb6u2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x4eag-0007vg...@franck.debian.org
Bug#753079: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#754199: librime: FTBFS on armel: std::future is broken
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Source: librime Severity: serious Control: block 753079 by -1 librime failed to build on armel because of the std::future brokenness on that platform, see #727621. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librimearch=armelver=1.1%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1404754412 This is blocking the librime transition. Emilio In such case, do you mind us uploading new upstream releases of fcitx-rime/ibus-rime into unstable right now? -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w63DT7cct5EkT9=h9x36rggf34vixe19mngcu9efeb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#753079: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#754199: librime: FTBFS on armel: std::future is broken
On 09/07/14 01:13, Aron Xu wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Source: librime Severity: serious Control: block 753079 by -1 librime failed to build on armel because of the std::future brokenness on that platform, see #727621. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librimearch=armelver=1.1%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1404754412 This is blocking the librime transition. Emilio In such case, do you mind us uploading new upstream releases of fcitx-rime/ibus-rime into unstable right now? Looks like this is going to be stuck for a while, so that should be alright. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bc7eef.7060...@debian.org
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: libxalan2-java_2.7.1-5+deb6u1_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x4ghp-0007h8...@franck.debian.org
Bug#740993: transition: openconnect
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:16:24 -0400, Mike Miller wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 16:19:34 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: I see that those bugs are now fixed in unstable. I suppose that means we can just binnmu them once openconnect is available in unstable, is that right? That sounds right to me. Please go ahead and upload openconnect to unstable. There is still some upstream work going on before finalizing the 6.00 release, so there is only the 5.99 beta in experimental for now. Once 6.00 is released upstream I will make sure there is no more additional ABI breakage, and then upload it to unstable, thanks for the go-ahead. OpenConnect 6.00 was just released and I have just uploaded 6.00-1 to unstable. So this should start the libopenconnect3 transition. -- mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 740993
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 740993 + pending Bug #740993 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 740993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740993 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14048842924712.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: retitle 751082 to nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 ..., cloning 751082 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 751082 nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 Bug #751082 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: Please package 337.25 in experimental as it should support Xorg 1.16. Changed Bug title to 'nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16' from 'nvidia-graphics-drivers: Please package 337.25 in experimental as it should support Xorg 1.16.' severity 751082 serious Bug #751082 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' clone 751082 -1 -2 Bug #751082 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 Bug 751082 cloned as bugs 754250-754251 754250 was not blocked by any bugs. 754250 was blocking: 753781 Added blocking bug(s) of 754250: 753781 754251 was not blocked by any bugs. 754251 was blocking: 753781 Added blocking bug(s) of 754251: 753781 reassign -1 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx 173.14.39-2 Bug #754250 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 Bug reassigned from package 'src:nvidia-graphics-drivers' to 'nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #754250 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #754250 to the same values previously set Bug #754250 [nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx] nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 There is no source info for the package 'nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx' at version '173.14.39-2' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '173.14.39-2' Marked as found in versions 173.14.39-2. reassign -2 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx 304.121-1 Bug #754251 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 Bug reassigned from package 'src:nvidia-graphics-drivers' to 'nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #754251 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #754251 to the same values previously set Bug #754251 [nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx] nvidia-graphics-drivers: incompatible with xserver 1.16 There is no source info for the package 'nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx' at version '304.121-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '304.121-1' Marked as found in versions 304.121-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 751082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751082 754250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754250 754251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754251 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140488526310208.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
