Bug#953383: transition: libgwenhywfar
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgwenhywfar.html Hi release team, the Gwenhywfar package got its SONAMEs cleaned up (actually synced with the main library) for its frontend libraries. For this reason some binary package names had to be changed: - libgwengui-gtk3-0 -> libgwengui-gtk3-79, - libgwengui-qt5-0 -> libgwengui-qt5-79, - libgwengui-fox16-0 -> libgwengui-fox16-79. Additionally with the SONAME now being in sync with the main library, the C++ frontend library previously packaged in libgwengui-cpp0 (which doesn't itself depend on any other GUI framework libraries like GTK) could be merged to the main library package libgwenhywfar79 and hence disappears. The affected packages will need a binNMU to pick up the new SONAME from the corresponding libgwengui-* package: * https://tracker.debian.org/gnucash * https://tracker.debian.org/kmymoney I didn't do a test rebuild of these packages, because reading through the upstream changes compared to the last uploader there were no other changes in the gui/ folder of the upstream source. I don't expect any breakage. Best regards, Micha Ben file: title = "libgwenhywfar"; is_affected = .depends ~ "\b(libgwengui\-cpp0|libgwengui\-fox16\-0|libgwengui\-gtk3\-0|libgwengui\-qt5\-0|libgwenhywfar79\-dev)\b" | .depends ~ "\b(libgwengui\-fox16\-79|libgwengui\-gtk3\-79|libgwengui\-qt5\-79)\b"; is_good = .depends ~ "\b(libgwengui\-fox16\-79|libgwengui\-gtk3\-79|libgwengui\-qt5\-79)\b"; is_bad = .depends ~ "\b(libgwengui\-cpp0|libgwengui\-fox16\-0|libgwengui\-gtk3\-0|libgwengui\-qt5\-0|libgwenhywfar79\-dev)\b";
Bug#949326: transition: libgwenhywfar
Hi Paul, On 24.01.20 22:18, Paul Gevers wrote: On 23-01-2020 22:22, Micha Lenk wrote: I think we are now ready to start the transition (moreinfo tag removed). Let me summarize again the planned transition actions: - micha: upload libgwenhywfar/5.1.2-1 (in experimental) to unstable - micha: upload libaqbanking/6.0.1-1 (in experimental) to unstable - micha: upload libchipcard/5.1.5rc2-3 (in experimental) to unstable - micha(?): schedule binNMU for gnucash to pickup the new SONAMEs. - pino: upload kmymoney/5.0.8-1 to unstable Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions. Release team, your turn. :) Please go ahead with this set in unstable. I did, but I think I am a bit stuck on gnucash (the last package pending in this transition). I filed https://bugs.debian.org/949806 to get a binNMU scheduled. What else could I do to help the transition to finish? Best regards, Micha
Bug#949806: nmu: gnucash_1:3.8b-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 949326 by -1 Hi release team, as described in #949326 the gnucash package needs a binNMU to pick up the new SONAMEs of libgwenhywfar and libaqbanking. nmu gnucash_1:3.8b-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against newer libgwenhywfar/libaqbanking." Thanks, Micha
Bug#949326: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#949326: transition: libgwenhywfar
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Pino, Today libaqbanking/6.0.1 cleared new and entered experimental. As you asked for it, I did a test build of kmymoney 5.0.8 using the new Gwenhywfar and AqBanking version (see attached patch for the changes I made to the package in unstable). It seems to build just fine (if required I can also send the full build log). On 21.01.20 06:43, Pino Toscano wrote: In data lunedì 20 gennaio 2020 22:10:38 CET, Micha Lenk ha scritto: On 20.01.20 09:52, Pino Toscano wrote: The newly released version of KMyMoney (5.0.8) requires: - Gwenhywfar >= 5.1.2 - AqBanking >= 6.0.1 I looked into that and just realized this version of AqBanking did a SONAME bump as well. This means its uploads will go through NEW. :( Ouch... OTOH, the AqBanking transition is basically a subset of the Gwenhywfar transition, so packing these two transitions together should simplify things a bit. Full ACK from my end. Considering the requirements of KMyMoney 5.0.8, I will upload this new version once the Gwenhywfar/AqBanking transition starts -- let me know when that happens. I think we are now ready to start the transition (moreinfo tag removed). Let me summarize again the planned transition actions: - micha: upload libgwenhywfar/5.1.2-1 (in experimental) to unstable - micha: upload libaqbanking/6.0.1-1 (in experimental) to unstable - micha: upload libchipcard/5.1.5rc2-3 (in experimental) to unstable - micha(?): schedule binNMU for gnucash to pickup the new SONAMEs. - pino: upload kmymoney/5.0.8-1 to unstable Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions. Release team, your turn. :) Best regards, Micha commit cb4b0e0f49ca671f2dc4a076f04f1b8811b91b78 Author: Micha Lenk Date: Thu Jan 23 20:34:20 2020 + New upstream version 5.0.8 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 848f8dc..b52e74f 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +kmymoney (5.0.8-1) experimental; urgency=medium + + * New upstream version. + * Update the build dependencies according to the upstream build system: +- bump libaqbanking-dev to 6.0.1, +- bump libgwenhywfar-core-dev, and libgwengui-qt5-dev to 5.1.2. + + -- Micha Lenk Thu, 23 Jan 2020 20:28:35 + + kmymoney (5.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 0c36c63..f55b9f8 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11), cmake, pkg-kde-tools (>= 0.15.16), libkf5wallet-dev, libkf5webkit-dev, libkf5xmlgui-dev, - libaqbanking-dev (>= 5.99.32~), - libgwenhywfar-core-dev (>= 4.99.16~), libgwengui-qt5-dev (>= 4.99.16~), + libaqbanking-dev (>= 6.0.1~), + libgwenhywfar-core-dev (>= 5.1.2~), libgwengui-qt5-dev (>= 5.1.2~), libgpgmepp-dev, libgpg-error-dev, libgpgme-dev, libalkimia5-dev (>= 7.0), libical-dev, libofx-dev, libgmp-dev,
Bug#949326: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#949326: transition: libgwenhywfar
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 20.01.20 09:52, Pino Toscano wrote: Since you are already updating Gwenhywfar, can you please update it to the newly released 5.1.2? Just uploaded to experimental. The newly released version of KMyMoney (5.0.8) requires: - Gwenhywfar >= 5.1.2 - AqBanking >= 6.0.1 I looked into that and just realized this version of AqBanking did a SONAME bump as well. This means its uploads will go through NEW. :( * https://tracker.debian.org/kmymoney will need a binNMU to pick up the new SONAME from libgwenhywfar. Did you rebuild KMyMoney with the new Gwenhywfar? Does it build fine? I will, once libaqbanking/6.0.1 cleared the NEW queue. I will update this bug with more information as soon as I have them. Pino, thank you for making me realize that this transition isn't ready yet. This saved us some frustration later on. Regards, Micha
Bug#949326: transition: libgwenhywfar
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, The Gwenhywfar package got its SONAME bumped in a recent release because some deprecated API functions got removed. For this reason its reverse dependencies need to be rebuilt at least. Affected packages are * https://tracker.debian.org/libchipcard successfully re-built in experimental. * https://tracker.debian.org/libaqbanking successfully re-built in experimental. * https://tracker.debian.org/gnucash will need a binNMU to pick up the new SONAME from libgwenhywfar. * https://tracker.debian.org/kmymoney will need a binNMU to pick up the new SONAME from libgwenhywfar. The auto-generated Ben transition tracker should do fine https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgwenhywfar.html Best regards, Micha Lenk
Bug#946710: nmu: libchipcard_5.1.4rc1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear wb team, libchipcard 5.1.4rc1-3 can't transition to testing at the momemt because of the following policy violations (copied from tracker.d.o): * Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by micha, a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration * Not built on buildd: arch amd64 binaries uploaded by micha I was forced to do a binary upload by another policy (ftp-master) because I added a new binary in this revision. As I don't have any real changes to upload that would give me a reason to do another (source-only) upload, can we do a binNMU on architectures 'all' and 'amd64' to remediate this situation? nmu libchipcard_5.1.4rc1-3 . all amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild to replace maintainer build by buildd build." Best regards, Micha
Bug#942707: transition: aqbanking6
Hi all, just for the records, the source package libchipcard is affected too (sorry for missing it initially). An upload to experimental is sitting in NEW. Best regards, Micha
Bug#942707: transition: aqbanking6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, AqBanking and Gwenhywfar, a Germany focused pair of libraries for online banking data exchange, recently ceased to work because bank server behavior changes that were caused by legal changes. The upstream author of these libraries is working on nnew releases, which I would like to upload to unstable soon, so that affected users will find better usable library versions in the archive. Due to soname bumps this upload will result in a multi package transition. The impacted source packages are: - libgwenhywfar: Already uploaded to experimental - libaqbanking: Already uploaded to experimental - kmymoney: Will need to be updated to newer upstream version 5.0.7 for passing builds (see also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942417). - gnucash: Will need only a binNMU Please ACK the transition when you consider it ready for upload. Best regards, Micha Ben file: title = "aqbanking6"; is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libgwenhywfar60|libgwenhywfar60\-dev|libaqbanking\-doc|libaqbanking35|libaqbanking35\-plugins|libaqebics0|libaqhbci24|libaqofxconnect7)\b/ | .depends ~ /\b(libgwenhywfar78|libgwenhywfar78\-dev|libaqbanking43)\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libgwenhywfar78|libgwenhywfar78\-dev|libaqbanking43)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libgwenhywfar60|libgwenhywfar60\-dev|libaqbanking\-doc|libaqbanking35|libaqbanking35\-plugins|libaqebics0|libaqhbci24|libaqofxconnect7)\b/;
Re: Bug#924134: unblock: libgwenhywfar/4.20.0-9
Hi release team, I just realized that the version information for Debian bug #875012 ([libgwenhywfar] Future Qt4 removal from Buster) was incomplete and inaccurate. I assume this to be caused by the merge of the upload history of the multiple unstable and experimental versions. I've just fixed the version in the BTS, so it should now accurately show which versions the Debian bug #875012 was fixed and which it was present. The main question I would like the release team to decide is, whether Debian bug #875012 is important enough to be fixed in buster. We don't have to, but we can (and I would like to) by unblocking libgwenhywfar/4.20.0-9. unblock libgwenhywfar/4.20.0-9 Thanks for considering and Best regards, Micha
Bug#924134: unblock: libgwenhywfar/4.20.0-9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libgwenhywfar In support of the Qt 4 removal efforts I wanted to remove the Qt 4 support library packages from libgwenhywfar (see #875012). But as the downstream dependency kmymoney took a bit longer to realize that buster will not ship a Qt 4 based version of kmymoney (see also my request at Nov 9th 2018 for an earlier upload to unstable in #874961), I couldn't do it as early as I wanted. Then, suddenly and more or less unexpectedly in the recent days, the kmymoney version based on Qt 5 became available in testing. For some reason I didn't get an immediate notification, but only realized this during my occasional package checks. Before we release buster, I would like to get some cleaned up version of libgwenhywfar into the release. These are the two major issues I want to see cleaned up, and that I consider this a low risk for the following reasons: * Binary packages libgwengui-qt4-0 and libgwengui-qt4-dev are removed. They don't have any reverse (build) dependencies left in buster. * The declared multiarch support for binary package libgwenhywfar-core-dev is reverted because it is broken (see #906560). A binary package not supporting multiarch seems to be better than a binary package with broken multiarch support. The following additional cosmetical changes in my opinion do not impact the functionality of the built binary packages at all: * Fix of a spelling mistake in an older debian/changelog entry * Added/updated meta data in debian/control and debian/watch * Integration with Salsa CI by adding debian/gitlab-ci.yml unblock libgwenhywfar/4.20.0-9 Thanks for considering and Best regards, Micha diff -Nru libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/changelog libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/changelog --- libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/changelog 2018-08-18 23:39:43.0 +0200 +++ libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/changelog 2019-03-06 22:05:49.0 +0100 @@ -1,9 +1,45 @@ +libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Drop binary packages libgwengui-qt4-0 and libgwengui-qt4-dev +now also in Debian unstable (Closes: #875012, LP: #1757732). + * Fix spelling mistake in debian/changelog entry for 4.20.0-8. + * debian/control: +- Add upstream homepage. +- Bump standards version to 4.3.0 (no changes needed). +- Vcs-Git: track Git branch 'master' again. + * debian/watch: Update to new upstream homepage. + * Revert attempts to make package libgwenhywfar-core-dev Multi-Arch: same +because it broke cross compiling (closes: #906560). This removes +multiarch_support_in_gwenhywfar-config_script.patch, removes the multiarch +hint and dependency on pkg-config from binary package +libgwenhywfar-core-dev. + * Integrate with Salsa CI by adding the file debian/gitlab-ci.yml. + + -- Micha Lenk Wed, 06 Mar 2019 22:05:49 +0100 + +libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-8) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Merge changes from libgwenhywfar 4.20.0-7 (unstable) for upload to +experimental. + * Improve cross building: Do not use /usr/lib//qt5. +Thanks to Helmut Grohne for providing the patch. +(Closes: #906543) + + -- Micha Lenk Sat, 18 Aug 2018 23:51:31 +0200 + libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix a regression introduced in 4.20.0-5 that causes libaqbanking to FTBFS. -- Micha Lenk Sat, 18 Aug 2018 23:39:43 +0200 +libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-6) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Merge changes from libgwenhywfar 4.20.0-5 (unstable) for upload to +experimental. + + -- Micha Lenk Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:35:48 +0200 + libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix pkgconfig's pkgincludedir variable by adding patch @@ -14,6 +50,14 @@ -- Micha Lenk Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:13:11 +0200 +libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-4) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Merge changes from libgwenhywfar 4.20.0-3 (unstable) for upload to +experimental. + * Vcs-Git: track Git branch 'experimental'. + + -- Micha Lenk Thu, 16 Aug 2018 23:12:03 +0200 + libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Drop Gtk 2 GUI bindings. @@ -23,6 +67,13 @@ -- Micha Lenk Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:53:23 +0200 +libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-2) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Drop binary packages libgwengui-qt4-0 and libgwengui-qt4-dev +(Closes: #875012, LP: #1757732). + + -- Micha Lenk Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:27:07 +0200 + libgwenhywfar (4.20.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 4.20.0 diff -Nru libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/control libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/control --- libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/control 2018-08-18 23:38:25.0 +0200 +++ libgwenhywfar-4.20.0/debian/control 2019-03-06 22:05:49.0 +0100 @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ libgnutls28-dev, libssl-dev, libfox-1.6-dev, - libqt4-dev, qtbase5-dev, libqt5opengl5-dev, libgtk-3-dev, @@ -17,9 +16,10 @@ asciidoc, xmlto, pkg-config -Standards
Bug#924045: unblock: smcroute/2.4.2-4
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo On 09.03.19 12:26, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 09:35:29PM +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: Because of the included cosmetic changes, the package isn't uploadede to unstable yet. It is currently only available on mentors.d.n as https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smcroute/smcroute_2.4.2-4.dsc Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when it is ready to unblock. I've just uploaded smcroute 2.4.2-4 to unstable, so I consider it ready to unblock. I should mention that compared to the initial debdiff I've amended only the debian/changelog to include also the missing "closes: #924044". You can find the updated debdiff attached to this mail. Kind regards, Micha diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2018-09-23 22:40:04.0 +0200 +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2019-03-07 06:40:19.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +smcroute (2.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Import upstream fix for malfunctioning 'stop' command to init script, +closes: #924044 + * Import upstream fix to allow same outbound interface as inbound when +routing. This is slightly hairy, but previous releases of SMCRoute +supported this and the unit tests rely on this to work + * Fix unit tests, with upstream and test setup fixes, closes: #921577 + * Bump Standards-Version to 4.3.0, no changes needed + * Use debhelper maintscript to relocate old /etc/startup.sh script +to /etc/smcroute. Fixes an outstanding lintian warning + + -- Joachim Nilsson Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:40:19 +0100 + smcroute (2.4.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Add missing Build-Depends for systemd, needed for unit file path diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control 2018-09-21 21:54:23.0 +0200 +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control 2019-03-07 06:40:19.0 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Joachim Nilsson Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), libcap-dev, systemd, pkg-config -Standards-Version: 4.2.1 +Standards-Version: 4.3.0 Homepage: http://troglobit.com/smcroute.html Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smcroute Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smcroute.git diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml 2019-03-07 06:40:19.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +image: registry.salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/ci-image-git-buildpackage:latest + +build: + artifacts: +paths: +- "*.deb" +expire_in: 1 day + script: +- gitlab-ci-git-buildpackage-all diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch 2019-03-07 06:40:19.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +commit 802d82eb5c571afe2a294fd302745bf37cc13a1d +Author: Joachim Nilsson +Date: Sun Feb 10 13:56:17 2019 +0100 + +Allow same outbound interface as inbound, only warn user + +Routing back multicast to the same interface it ingressed on is +quite a bit dangerous, but there may be use-cases where this is +a requirement so we should not artificially limit the user. + +Also, allowing this means enabling unit testing on systems with +only one interface. + +Signed-off-by: Joachim Nilsson + +diff --git a/src/conf.c b/src/conf.c +index 974871a..d1fbeed 100644 +--- a/src/conf.c b/src/conf.c +@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ + #define MAX_LINE_LEN 512 + #define DEBUG(fmt, args...) \ + smclog(LOG_DEBUG, "%s:%02d: " fmt, conf, lineno, ##args) ++#define INFO(fmt, args...) \ ++ smclog(LOG_INFO, "%s:%02d: " fmt, conf, lineno, ##args) + #define WARN(fmt, args...) \ + smclog(LOG_WARNING, "%s:%02d: " fmt, conf, lineno, ##args) + +@@ -166,13 +168,9 @@ static int add_mroute(int lineno, char *ifname, char *group, char *source, char + iface_match_init(_out); + while ((mif = iface_match_mif_by_name(outbound[i], _out, )) >= 0) { + if (mif == mroute.inbound) { +- state_out.match_count--; +- /* In case of wildcard matches, in==out is +- * quite normal, so don't complain +- */ ++ /* In case of wildcard match in==out is normal, so don't complain */ + if (!ifname_is_wildcard(ifname) && !ifname_is_wildcard(outbound[i])) +- WARN("Same outbound IPv6 interface (%s) as inbound (%s)?", outbound[i], ifname); +- continue; ++ INFO("Same outbound IPv6 interface (%s) as inbound (%s) may cause r
Bug#924045: unblock: smcroute/2.4.2-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock We are not in full freeze yet, but according to the announced schedule, it looks like 2.4.2-4 won't make it into buster even if uploaded yesterday. So, please unblock package smcroute, because * it fixes Debian bug #924044, broken init script not working for 'stop' command, which is a regression compared to the version in Debian stretch. * it fixes Debian bug #921577, autopkgtests fail consistently, and some related issues with the autopkgtests (referenced as unit tests in the debian/changelog). The proposed upload also contains rather cosmetic changes, i.e. * Bumping the Debian policy version. This is hopefully acceptable because no source changes were needed. * Removing all explicit maintainer scripts in favour of managing the snippets for moving the configuration file via debhelper. I personally checked that the resulting binary packages' maintainer scripts are bitwise identical after this change. So, hopefully this is acceptable too. Because of the included cosmetic changes, the package isn't uploadede to unstable yet. It is currently only available on mentors.d.n as https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smcroute/smcroute_2.4.2-4.dsc unblock smcroute/2.4.2-4 Thank you for considering, Micha diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2018-09-23 20:40:04.0 + +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2019-03-07 05:40:19.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +smcroute (2.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Import upstream fix for malfunctioning 'stop' command to init script + * Import upstream fix to allow same outbound interface as inbound when +routing. This is slightly hairy, but previous releases of SMCRoute +supported this and the unit tests rely on this to work + * Fix unit tests, with upstream and test setup fixes, closes: #921577 + * Bump Standards-Version to 4.3.0, no changes needed + * Use debhelper maintscript to relocate old /etc/startup.sh script +to /etc/smcroute. Fixes an outstanding lintian warning + + -- Joachim Nilsson Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:40:19 +0100 + smcroute (2.4.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Add missing Build-Depends for systemd, needed for unit file path diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control 2018-09-21 19:54:23.0 + +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/control 2019-03-07 05:40:19.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Joachim Nilsson Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), libcap-dev, systemd, pkg-config -Standards-Version: 4.2.1 +Standards-Version: 4.3.0 Homepage: http://troglobit.com/smcroute.html Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smcroute Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smcroute.git diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/gitlab-ci.yml 2019-03-07 05:40:19.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +image: registry.salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/ci-image-git-buildpackage:latest + +build: + artifacts: +paths: +- "*.deb" +expire_in: 1 day + script: +- gitlab-ci-git-buildpackage-all diff -Nru smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch --- smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ smcroute-2.4.2/debian/patches/0004-Allow-same-outbound-interface-as-inbound.patch 2019-03-07 05:40:19.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +commit 802d82eb5c571afe2a294fd302745bf37cc13a1d +Author: Joachim Nilsson +Date: Sun Feb 10 13:56:17 2019 +0100 + +Allow same outbound interface as inbound, only warn user + +Routing back multicast to the same interface it ingressed on is +quite a bit dangerous, but there may be use-cases where this is +a requirement so we should not artificially limit the user. + +Also, allowing this means enabling unit testing on systems with +only one interface. + +Signed-off-by: Joachim Nilsson + +diff --git a/src/conf.c b/src/conf.c +index 974871a..d1fbeed 100644 +--- a/src/conf.c b/src/conf.c +@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ + #define MAX_LINE_LEN 512 + #define DEBUG(fmt, args...) \ + smclog(LOG_DEBUG, "%s:%02d: " fmt, conf, lineno, ##args) ++#define INFO(fmt, args...)\ ++ smclog(LOG_INFO, "%s:%02d: " fmt, conf, lineno, ##args) + #define WARN(fmt, args...)\ + smclog(LOG_WARNING, "%s:%02d: " fmt, conf, lineno, ##args) + +@@ -166,13 +168,9 @@ static int add_mroute(int lineno, char *ifname, char *group, char *source, char +
Re: Proposal: Repository for fast-paced package backports
Hi all, having read the whole Gitlab discussion, I still don't get how/why the new repository depends or relates to backports. Instead it could be self-contained, except for stuff already available in stable. Couldn't you roll the new repository entirely independent of any backports? Even if you say there won't be any additional work for the backport policy owners, letting a new repo depend on backports will implicitly have an impact, which doesn't sound fully thought through yet. I consider especially copying parts of the version scheme fairly confusing. This gives your concept a bad touch of just trying to work around established rules (i.e. backports rules). Instead of defining such minor facets I would recommend you to work on clarity about what rules you want to establish in the new repo instead. Also, as Alex suggested, I would prefer if such experiments could be started outside the official Debian archive, like backports once successfully did. Given how much efforts it took to get backports integrated officially, I don't consider adding a new repo a minor change. Did you discuss your idea with ftp masters, dak maintainers, and buildd admins before? I acknowledge that Debian needs a solution to support fast moving projects like Gitlab better than now. Yet, without a *proof* of concept how this could work out in the long run (i.e. across more than one Debian release cycle), I don't think it is the right time to ask for such a big change now. I consider Debian open enough to support such concepts outside the official archive first. Kind regards, Micha
Re: gstreamer0.10 0.10.36-1.5 MIGRATED to testing
Hi, Given Debian bug #802812 is open, the migration of gstreamer0.10 0.10.36-1.5 to testing just one day after its removal seems to be unintended. Cheers, Micha P.S. Sorry for the TOFU, but at least my mail should be self-contained. On 3. März 2016 17:39:11 MEZ, Debian testing watchwrote: >FYI: The status of the gstreamer0.10 source package >in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: (not in testing) > Current version: 0.10.36-1.5 > >-- >This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation >of >new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive >later changes on the next day. >See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Mobiltelefon mit Kaiten Mail gesendet.
Bug#797005: nmu: gnucash_1:2.6.7-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnucash_1:2.6.7-2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libktoblzcheck1v5 See also https://bugs.debian.org/791134 (g++ ABI transition in libktoblzcheck) and https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libktoblzcheck.html Thanks for considering. Best regards, Micha
Bug#795409: nmu: libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2+b1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2+b2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libktoblzcheck1v5 See also https://bugs.debian.org/791134 (g++ ABI transition in libktoblzcheck). Regards, Micha
Bug#795409: nmu: libaqbanking_5.6.1-1
Control: retitle -1 nmu: libaqbanking_5.6.1-1 Sorry, my previous mail was garbage (wrong version). Using correct version: nmu libaqbanking_5.6.1-1+b1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libktoblzcheck1v5 See also https://bugs.debian.org/791134 (g++ ABI transition in libktoblzcheck). Regards, Micha
Bug#795409: nmu: libaqbanking_5.6.1-1
Hi Julien, Am 13.08.2015 um 20:54 schrieb Julien Cristau: nmu libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2+b2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libktoblzcheck1v5 See also https://bugs.debian.org/791134 (g++ ABI transition in libktoblzcheck). 5.4.3beta2-2 is the jessie version, so that doesn't make much sense. Yes, see my previous mail. The correct version to binNMU is: nmu libaqbanking_5.6.1-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libktoblzcheck1v5 Also, have you confirmed that a rebuild with new g++ and libktoblzcheck does not affect libaqbanking's ABI? It shouldn't. The C++ API of libaqbanking (that would be libaqbankingpp.so) isn't packaged at the moment. It should be safe to rebuild libaqbanking using the new g++. Cheers, Micha
Bug#787024: transition: libaqbanking
Hi Emilio, Am 04.06.2015 um 17:32 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: Let us know once the package has been through NEW. That's happened. You can go ahead with an upload to unstable, followed by severity:serious bugs against the rdeps to update their build-dependency on libaqbanking-dev. Please make those bugs block this one. Done. Meanwhile all rdeps have successfully been rebuilt. However the transition tracker still considers libaqbanking itself bad (i.e. renders it red on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libaqbanking.html). Why? Does it maybe need a britney hint? Is there anything left I can help with regarding the completion of this transition? Cheers, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/557744f9.9050...@debian.org
Bug#787024: transition: libaqbanking
Hi, Am 28.05.2015 00:35, schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: On 27/05/15 23:11, Micha Lenk wrote: [...] As AqBanking's API seems to have stabilized recently, do you recommend to transition the -dev package to the new name libaqbanking-dev instead? If so, is there anything to keep in mind if the old package libaqbanking34-dev already has a Provides: libaqbanking-dev (it has it actually long since)? The reverse dependencies currently all build-depend on libaqbanking34-dev. Please rename it to libaqbanking-dev. [...] I renamed it and uploaded it to experimental as libaqbanking 5.6.0beta-2. It is currently in NEW. The following reverse dependencies will be impacted by this transition: abtransfers gnucash kmymoney BTW do the rdeps build against the new version? Or do they need code changes? I didn't try, but as I am following upstream closely I don't expect that any code changes are needed. The SONAME bump was done as a precaution measure because some symbols were temporarily added to the library that got removed in libaqbanking 5.5.1-1 (only in experimental). Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/fe10858cd44ad5069278a68b03e7e...@mail.lenk.info
Bug#787024: transition: libaqbanking
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, The AqBanking library (source package libaqbanking) got its SONAME bumped. For this reason some package names need to be changed. I just uploaded the following binary package name changes as libaqbanking/5.6.0beta-1 to experimental: libaqbanking34-dev - libaqbanking35-dev libaqbanking34-plugins - libaqbanking35-plugins libaqbanking34 - libaqbanking35 libaqbanking34-dbg - libaqbanking35-dbg On the Transitions wiki page you mention that changing the name of -dev packages should be avoided. As AqBanking's API seems to have stabilized recently, do you recommend to transition the -dev package to the new name libaqbanking-dev instead? If so, is there anything to keep in mind if the old package libaqbanking34-dev already has a Provides: libaqbanking-dev (it has it actually long since)? The reverse dependencies currently all build-depend on libaqbanking34-dev. The following reverse dependencies will be impacted by this transition: abtransfers gnucash kmymoney Ben file: title = libaqbanking; is_affected = .depends ~ /libaqbanking34/ | .depends ~ /libaqbanking35/; is_good = .depends ~ /libaqbanking35/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libaqbanking34/; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150527211131.8892.42857.report...@piri.lenk.info
Re: Bug#780056: network-manager: fails to restore DNS settings and default route on resume
Hi maintainers of package network-manager, I got no human reply for my bug report since a month, so I just wanted to remind you that I am still waiting for it. My bug is still reliably reproducible, and I wonder whether it qualifies as release critical for Jessie. I really need more instructions on how to proceed with debugging. Cheers, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55256efe.4040...@debian.org
Bug#774818: unblock: mod-proxy-msrpc/0.5-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider to unblock package mod-proxy-msrpc 0.5-2. This version adds upsteam-big-endian-patch.diff to fix FTBFS #774285 on big endian architectures. unblock mod-proxy-msrpc/0.5-2 Thanks for considering, Micha diffstat for mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5 mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5 changelog | 12 + control|2 patches/series |1 patches/upstream-big-endian-patch.diff | 381 + 4 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -Nru mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/changelog mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/changelog --- mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/changelog 2014-04-29 22:08:12.0 +0200 +++ mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/changelog 2015-01-07 23:07:19.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +mod-proxy-msrpc (0.5-2) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Upload to experimental because I don't know whether this change will +get a freeze exception for Debian Jessie. + * Add patch upstream-big-endian-patch.diff to fix build on big endian +architectures (closes: #774285). This essentially updates the source to +upstream Git commit 03ed564ee88b1a35e830c4f141e178125010c265 (all changes +since the release 0.5 were only related to big-endian support). + * Package is compliant to Debian Policy 3.9.6 (no changes needed). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Wed, 07 Jan 2015 22:48:39 +0100 + mod-proxy-msrpc (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version diff -Nru mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/control mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/control --- mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/control 2014-04-29 21:50:06.0 +0200 +++ mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/control 2015-01-07 23:07:12.0 +0100 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.0.0), pkg-config, apache2-dev (= 2.4), uuid-dev, check, dh-autoreconf -Standards-Version: 3.9.5 +Standards-Version: 3.9.6 Homepage: https://github.com/bombadil/mod_proxy_msrpc Vcs-Git: https://github.com/bombadil/mod_proxy_msrpc.git -b debian/unstable Vcs-Browser: https://github.com/bombadil/mod_proxy_msrpc/tree/debian/unstable diff -Nru mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/series mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/series --- mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/series 2015-01-07 22:47:46.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +upstream-big-endian-patch.diff diff -Nru mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/upstream-big-endian-patch.diff mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/upstream-big-endian-patch.diff --- mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/upstream-big-endian-patch.diff 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/debian/patches/upstream-big-endian-patch.diff 2015-01-07 22:46:54.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ +Author: Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info +Description: Add support for build on big-endian architectures + This essentially updates the source to upstream Git commit + 03ed564ee88b1a35e830c4f141e178125010c265 (all changes since the + release 0.5 were only related to big-endian support). +Origin: upstream, https://github.com/bombadil/mod_proxy_msrpc/commit/03ed564ee88b1a35e830c4f141e178125010c265 +Bug: https://github.com/bombadil/mod_proxy_msrpc/issues/18 +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/774285 + +--- mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5.orig/src/msrpc_pdu_parser.c mod-proxy-msrpc-0.5/src/msrpc_pdu_parser.c +@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static const char const *msrpc_rts_pdu_c + NULL, + }; + ++#define MSRPC_PDU_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN (pdu-data_representation == MSRPC_PDU_DATA_REPRESENTATION_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ++ + apr_status_t msrpc_pdu_get_length(const char *buf, apr_size_t *length) + { + msrpc_pdu_t *pdu = (msrpc_pdu_t *)buf; +@@ -81,7 +83,10 @@ apr_status_t msrpc_pdu_get_length(const + return APR_INCOMPLETE; + } + +-*length = pdu-frag_length; ++#ifdef DEBUG_MSRPC_PDU_PARSER ++printf(data representation: 0x%08x\n, (uint32_t)pdu-data_representation); ++#endif ++*length = MSRPC_PDU_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN ? pdu-frag_length : swap_bytes_uint16_t(pdu-frag_length); + return APR_SUCCESS; + } + +@@ -110,11 +115,13 @@ apr_status_t msrpc_pdu_validate(const ch + if (error) *error = PDU type; + return APR_FROM_OS_ERROR(EBADMSG); + } +-if (pdu-data_representation != 16) { ++if ((pdu-data_representation != MSRPC_PDU_DATA_REPRESENTATION_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ++(pdu-data_representation != MSRPC_PDU_DATA_REPRESENTATION_BIG_ENDIAN)) { + if (error) *error = data representation; + return APR_FROM_OS_ERROR(EBADMSG); + } +-if (pdu-frag_length % 4 != 0) { ++uint16_t frag_length = MSRPC_PDU_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN ? pdu-frag_length : swap_bytes_uint16_t(pdu-frag_length); ++if (frag_length % 4 != 0) { + if (error) *error = unaligned length; + return APR_FROM_OS_ERROR(EBADMSG); + } +@@ -130,18 +137,24
Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1
Control: tags 772679 - wontfix Control: reopen 772679 Hi Ivo, Am 10.12.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Ivo De Decker: + * Add Conflict: id-utils to libuser (closes: #748728). It was clearly mentioned in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748728#34 that this change is not acceptable. I am sorry, but I read that message as only the particular change suggested in 748728#12 being rejected. Yes, Julien said that one of the two packages needs to rename the binary 'lid'. But I find this (renaming the binary, manpages et al, having to deal with users that find the binary 'lid' apparently disappearing just because of an update) a rather intrusive change during a freeze. And I don't believe this is was meant as the only solution but rather a suggestion. Julien, could you please elaborate why we can't have the 'lid' command be shipped both by libuser and id-utils (as you stated in 748728#34) *even if* a Conflicts: dependency prevents installation of both packages at the same time? Cheers, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54883f69.4030...@debian.org
Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libuser The version just uploaded to unstable fixes the RC bug #748728. diff -Nru libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/changelog libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/changelog --- libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/changelog 2014-05-19 17:52:26.0 +0200 +++ libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/changelog 2014-12-09 23:13:42.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +libuser (1:0.60~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add Conflict: id-utils to libuser (closes: #748728). + * Lower the priority of binary package libuser to 'extra' to have the +Conflicts: id-utils in compliance with Debian Policy 2.5 ('optional +packages should not conflict with each other'). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:11:03 + + libuser (1:0.60~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * complete repackaging (Closes: #670663). diff -Nru libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/control libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/control --- libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/control2014-05-19 16:03:29.0 +0200 +++ libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/control2014-12-09 23:09:13.0 +0100 @@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ Homepage: https://fedorahosted.org/libuser/ Package: libuser +Priority: extra Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} +Conflicts: id-utils Description: user and group account administration library - utilities The libuser library implements a standardized interface for manipulating and administering user and group accounts. The library uses pluggable unblock libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141209224401.24069.21098.report...@piri.lenk.info
Bug#771248: unblock: abtransfers/0.0.5.0-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider to unblock package abtransfers The version in unstable fixes the issue that there were no menu entries for the application. --- 8 --- diff -Nru abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.desktop abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.desktop --- abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.desktop 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.desktop 2014-11-27 23:12:07.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +[Desktop Entry] +Name=abTransfers +Categories=Office +Exec=abtransfers +Terminal=false +Type=Application diff -Nru abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.dirs abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.dirs --- abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.dirs 2014-09-20 22:14:36.0 +0200 +++ abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.dirs 2014-11-27 23:12:07.0 +0100 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ usr/bin +usr/share/applications diff -Nru abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.install abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.install --- abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.install 2014-09-20 22:14:36.0 +0200 +++ abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/abtransfers.install 2014-11-27 23:12:07.0 +0100 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ usr/bin/abtransfers +usr/share/applications/abtransfers.desktop diff -Nru abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/changelog abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/changelog --- abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/changelog2014-09-20 22:14:36.0 +0200 +++ abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/changelog2014-11-27 23:12:07.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +abtransfers (0.0.5.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Add a menu entry for Gnome, KDE, LXDE and XFCE by shipping a desktop file +(Closes: #750979). Thanks to Tobias Scherer t...@gmx.net for providing +the patch. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:10:51 +0100 + abtransfers (0.0.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version. diff -Nru abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/rules abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/rules --- abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/rules2014-09-20 22:14:36.0 +0200 +++ abtransfers-0.0.5.0/debian/rules2014-11-27 23:12:07.0 +0100 @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ dh_auto_install install -d debian/tmp/usr/bin install build/abtransfers debian/tmp/usr/bin + install -d debian/tmp/usr/share/applications + install debian/abtransfers.desktop debian/tmp/usr/share/applications # Work around existing directory 'build' build: --- 8 --- unblock abtransfers/0.0.5.0-2 Thanks a lot for considering. Best regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141127230503.9185.76930.report...@piri.lenk.info
Bug#767695: unblock: smcroute/2.0.0-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package smcroute The package in smcroute is RC buggy (#766915: smcroute does not start). adsb already added an age-days 2 smcroute/2.0.0-3 hint on 2014-10-30, but I just uploaded a fix for the autopkgtests, so at least the version number in the hint needs to be updated. This is why I am contacting you. The debdiff since the already hinted version is: --- 8 - diff -Nru smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog --- smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog 2014-10-30 16:11:16.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog 2014-11-01 21:00:11.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +smcroute (2.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix autopkgtest: Add missing smcroute test dependency, missing comma, and +missing allow-stderr (Closes: #767592). Thanks to Martin Pitt +martin.p...@ubuntu.com for providing the patch. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sat, 01 Nov 2014 20:55:08 +0100 + smcroute (2.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Add Testsuite: autopkgtest to debian/control, on behalf of a traveling diff -Nru smcroute-2.0.0/debian/tests/control smcroute-2.0.0/debian/tests/control --- smcroute-2.0.0/debian/tests/control 2014-10-30 00:30:58.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-2.0.0/debian/tests/control 2014-11-01 21:00:11.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ Tests: daemon-init-scripts mr-cache-ipv4 mr-cache-ipv6 -Restrictions: needs-root isolation-machine -Depends: libipc-system-simple-perl procps +Restrictions: needs-root isolation-machine allow-stderr +Depends: @, libipc-system-simple-perl, procps --- 8 - The debdiff since the version 2.0.0-1 that is available in testing is attached. If you agree, please pick from the following what ever hint you find most appropriate (I would take the age-days hint): unblock smcroute/2.0.0-4 age-days 2 smcroute/2.0.0-4 Thanks in advance, Micha diff -Nru smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog --- smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog 2014-10-03 10:56:12.0 +0200 +++ smcroute-2.0.0/debian/changelog 2014-11-01 21:00:11.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,30 @@ +smcroute (2.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix autopkgtest: Add missing smcroute test dependency, missing comma, and +missing allow-stderr (Closes: #767592). Thanks to Martin Pitt +martin.p...@ubuntu.com for providing the patch. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sat, 01 Nov 2014 20:55:08 +0100 + +smcroute (2.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Add Testsuite: autopkgtest to debian/control, on behalf of a traveling +Micha + + -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:11:03 +0100 + +smcroute (2.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Delete debian/smcroute.dirs because package builds also without it. + * Install binaries to /usr/sbin to make init script working again +(Closes: #766915). + * Add patch 0001-Fix-issue-10-Loop-forever-on-command-if-daemon-not-r.patch +to fix hanging init script on stop in case the daemon isn't running. + * Add some Autopkgtests covering daemon start stop via System V init scripts, +addition and removal of static multicast routes. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:27:59 +0100 + smcroute (2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version, does build again on FreeBSD (closes: #763381). diff -Nru smcroute-2.0.0/debian/control smcroute-2.0.0/debian/control --- smcroute-2.0.0/debian/control 2014-10-01 22:44:34.0 +0200 +++ smcroute-2.0.0/debian/control 2014-11-01 21:00:11.0 +0100 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Homepage: http://troglobit.com/smcroute.html Vcs-Browser: http://source.lenk.info/git/pkg-smcroute.git Vcs-Git: git://source.lenk.info/git/pkg-smcroute.git +Testsuite: autopkgtest Package: smcroute Architecture: any diff -Nru smcroute-2.0.0/debian/patches/0001-Fix-issue-10-Loop-forever-on-command-if-daemon-not-r.patch smcroute-2.0.0/debian/patches/0001-Fix-issue-10-Loop-forever-on-command-if-daemon-not-r.patch --- smcroute-2.0.0/debian/patches/0001-Fix-issue-10-Loop-forever-on-command-if-daemon-not-r.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-2.0.0/debian/patches/0001-Fix-issue-10-Loop-forever-on-command-if-daemon-not-r.patch 2014-11-01 21:00:11.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +From: Joachim Nilsson troglo...@gmail.com +Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:32:54 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix issue #10: Loop forever on command if daemon not running. +Origin: https://github.com/troglobit/smcroute/commit/d6280e64b27d5a4bd7f37dac36b455f4ae5f9ab3 +Bug: https://github.com/troglobit/smcroute/issues/10 + +Signed-off-by: Joachim Nilsson troglo...@gmail.com +--- + smcroute.c | 3 ++- + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/smcroute.c b/smcroute.c +index 1aeb133..7bd3c72 100644 +--- a/smcroute.c b/smcroute.c +@@ -573,10 +573,11 @@ int main(int
Bug#708247: pu: package smcroute/0.95-1+deb7u1
Control: retitle -1 pu: package smcroute/0.95-1+deb7u1 Hi KiBi, Am 21.05.2013 23:57, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: I'd suggest: - upload 0.95-2 to unstable right away, with 3.0 (quilt) if you like. - wait a few days to make sure no regressions are reported. - propose a 0.95-1+deb7u1 debdiff with the patch applied directly (without the format change); since it shouldn't be much of a change apart from the version string, it should be quick to review. ;) As suggested, I am hereby suggesting the attached debdiff output for releasing smcroute 0.95-1+deb7u1 in the next point release of wheezy. Thanks for considering. Cheers, Micha diff -u smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog --- smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog +++ smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +smcroute (0.95-1+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low + + * Fix a NULL pointer dereferencing in interface vector initialization +(closes: #707793, LP: #1043688). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Mon, 27 May 2013 21:22:39 +0200 + smcroute (0.95-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version, added support for FreeBSD only in patch2: unchanged: --- smcroute-0.95.orig/src/ifvc.c +++ smcroute-0.95/src/ifvc.c @@ -50,12 +50,13 @@ } for (ifa = ifaddr; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa-ifa_next) { +/* Skip interface without internet address */ +if (ifa-ifa_addr == NULL) continue; + int family = ifa-ifa_addr-sa_family; /* Skip non-IPv4 and non-IPv6 interfaces */ if ((family != AF_INET) (family != AF_INET6)) continue; -/* Skip interface without internet address */ -if (ifa-ifa_addr == NULL) continue; /* Copy data from interface iterator 'ifa' */ strncpy(IfDescEp-Name, ifa-ifa_name, sizeof(IfDescEp-Name));
Bug#708247: pu: package smcroute/0.95-1+deb7u1
Hi, Am 27.05.2013 21:34, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 21:28 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: As suggested, I am hereby suggesting the attached debdiff output for releasing smcroute 0.95-1+deb7u1 in the next point release of wheezy. Please go ahead; thanks. I've just uploaded the proposed changes. Cheers, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a3b7b8.5090...@debian.org
Bug#708247: pu: package smcroute/0.95-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi KiBi, Am 21.05.2013 23:57, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: One is supposed to be fixing the bug in unstable first though. “Exposing” users to bug fixes before uploading to spu is usually a very good idea. Also, versions must be stable = testing = unstable, which your upload would violate. I'd suggest: - upload 0.95-2 to unstable right away, with 3.0 (quilt) if you like. Done. - wait a few days to make sure no regressions are reported. - propose a 0.95-1+deb7u1 debdiff with the patch applied directly (without the format change); since it shouldn't be much of a change apart from the version string, it should be quick to review. ;) Will do. Regards, Micha -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRnLgMAAoJEOpsprlRuFE54loQAKNBZPsPCVFlQrYdKdUEElz4 VFpUUoFsjnJyXGLMXgJecItJe9HMdPa6TUVMWOK9mKW32o60oKWnZXOrlQ6yyVTu NKyHbLCwD+H/U212v+j5/wQ5HwElPys7aT94GiOR6ILz/LFLxi0IldxqWM6woz0q PUw7eJFwXyNXbmJBCn5BRIuS/8YAyUaQOnq1+8BAV/xcjAQufz7sRU6S61OxTK6V N2JKaC28ZPnIj2fv1gse4RbsumuIjNTkVXExFglOUExoIInYsZSvk7+11CKkcJ17 6IZTqsfKwkUFP8rSw9+ZHkMyjQNJFK0HnEhOWrptb06oea3CoN/WyRwUAButlaeE HCcuTnGfEzPIveYTaLonRdpYoXjkMVOhVWVbt6/w8HQykpdcVpvmFb77eiNBqrqs H6LIJ4vZtJb1A8h029cHusL8d3YwVAtBku5Qc6sRxCFDm+D/2MfLGPGUQt+9SwB3 fH1KYQ4/qEufIsBsyQS90LbjdrtE7FD5Nj0xKCEvl3yFA7msP/ta//Ozf2RA6ggj TrVJZ2Scdliqc1X6hC10+BRvjB8bGBMz4msc8I7Kg5Gu0q6MCAOdxosN87gNo2Ro kmrSloG1BGe9/Y92ycW+egM7Fh+kEtIDmtw6FhTiNfLfO5bl5949Q3zYn6gQ7RsW O01f7q+003wnSHFbVmMH =+pTe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/519cb80c.8060...@debian.org
Bug#708247: pu: package smcroute/0.95-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello brave release-team, I would like to propose smcroute/0.95-2 as a canididate for the next wheezy point release. Compared to the version released with wheezy, I did following changes: smcroute (0.95-2) stable; urgency=low * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format for easier patch maintenance. * Added patch 01_fix_segfault.patch to fix a NULL pointer dereferencing in interface vector initialization (closes: #707793, LP: #1043688). -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Tue, 14 May 2013 14:41:24 +0200 You can find the full diff of changes attached to this mail. Is the distribution 'stable' correct for wheezy proposed updates? Regards, Micha diff -Nru smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog --- smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog 2013-05-14 15:02:54.0 +0200 +++ smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog 2013-05-14 15:01:23.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +smcroute (0.95-2) stable; urgency=low + + * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format for easier patch maintenance. + * Added patch 01_fix_segfault.patch to fix a NULL pointer dereferencing in +interface vector initialization (closes: #707793, LP: #1043688). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Tue, 14 May 2013 14:41:24 +0200 + smcroute (0.95-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version, added support for FreeBSD diff -Nru smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/01_fix_segfault.patch smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/01_fix_segfault.patch --- smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/01_fix_segfault.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/01_fix_segfault.patch 2013-05-14 14:47:54.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +Description: Fixed a segfault caused by dereferencing a NULL pointer +Author: Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/707793 +Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1043688 +Forwarded: not-needed, fixed upstream by more intrusive code changes +Last-Update: 2013-05-14 + +--- smcroute-0.95.orig/src/ifvc.c smcroute-0.95/src/ifvc.c +@@ -50,12 +50,13 @@ void buildIfVc() + } + + for (ifa = ifaddr; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa-ifa_next) { ++/* Skip interface without internet address */ ++if (ifa-ifa_addr == NULL) continue; ++ + int family = ifa-ifa_addr-sa_family; + + /* Skip non-IPv4 and non-IPv6 interfaces */ + if ((family != AF_INET) (family != AF_INET6)) continue; +-/* Skip interface without internet address */ +-if (ifa-ifa_addr == NULL) continue; + + /* Copy data from interface iterator 'ifa' */ + strncpy(IfDescEp-Name, ifa-ifa_name, sizeof(IfDescEp-Name)); diff -Nru smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/series smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/series --- smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-0.95/debian/patches/series 2013-05-14 14:44:07.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +01_fix_segfault.patch diff -Nru smcroute-0.95/debian/source/format smcroute-0.95/debian/source/format --- smcroute-0.95/debian/source/format 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ smcroute-0.95/debian/source/format 2013-05-14 14:41:24.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3.0 (quilt)
Bug#708247: pu: package smcroute/0.95-2
Hi Ansgar, Am 14.05.2013 15:35, schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: On 05/14/2013 15:16, Micha Lenk wrote: * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format for easier patch maintenance. I'm not on the release team, but from experience the release team doesn't want such changes in stable. Please apply the patch directly. Even though personally I prefer to manage patches somehow, I am also fine with applying this single patch directly. See an updated debdiff output attached to this message. Regards, Micha diff -u smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog --- smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog +++ smcroute-0.95/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +smcroute (0.95-2) stable; urgency=low + + * Fix a NULL pointer dereferencing in interface vector initialization +(closes: #707793, LP: #1043688). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Tue, 14 May 2013 15:59:20 +0200 + smcroute (0.95-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version, added support for FreeBSD only in patch2: unchanged: --- smcroute-0.95.orig/src/ifvc.c +++ smcroute-0.95/src/ifvc.c @@ -50,12 +50,13 @@ } for (ifa = ifaddr; ifa != NULL; ifa = ifa-ifa_next) { +/* Skip interface without internet address */ +if (ifa-ifa_addr == NULL) continue; + int family = ifa-ifa_addr-sa_family; /* Skip non-IPv4 and non-IPv6 interfaces */ if ((family != AF_INET) (family != AF_INET6)) continue; -/* Skip interface without internet address */ -if (ifa-ifa_addr == NULL) continue; /* Copy data from interface iterator 'ifa' */ strncpy(IfDescEp-Name, ifa-ifa_name, sizeof(IfDescEp-Name));
Bug#705846: unblock: libchipcard/5.0.3beta-3
Control: reopen -1 Am 21.04.2013 13:23, schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Assuming this is the same as Bug#705840, closing. No, it isn't. In some setups (those using no chipcard) AqBanking works without chipcard plugins installed. For this reason the dependencies are (intentionally) weaker: Package: libaqbanking34 Suggests: aqbanking-tools Package: aqbanking-tools Depends: libaqhbci20 (via ${shlibs:Depends}) Package: libaqhbci20 Suggests: libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins So, this is really an issue here, and the transitional package should really help in this case. Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5173cf72.7000...@debian.org
Bug#705840: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libaqbanking A user reported to me in private that the AqBanking plugins to Gwenhywfar get lost on upgrade from squeezy to wheezy. The reason is that the package libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 got renamed to libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60, but (intentionally) no other package depends or recommends the package libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60. The impact is, that for all users that want to use it, AqBanking doesn't work anymore. I would like to add a transitional dummy package libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 that depends on libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60, so that AqBanking continues to work on upgrades from squeeze to wheezy. You can find the suggested changes attached to this mail. As the suggested change introduces a new binary package, is there any special need to raise attention of the FTP masters before the upload? unblock libaqbanking/5.0.24 diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-12-09 13:43:14.0 +0100 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2013-04-20 20:42:36.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libaqbanking (5.0.24-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add transitional dummy package libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 +(closes: #705839), which existed in squeeze, but was renamed to +libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60 in wheezy. It should help users +upgrading from squeeze to wheezy. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:38:44 +0200 + libaqbanking (5.0.24-3) unstable; urgency=low * Revert injection of build flags from dpkg-buildflags, as requested by the diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control 2012-06-03 19:28:50.0 +0200 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control 2013-04-20 20:38:00.0 +0200 @@ -86,6 +86,18 @@ . This package contains plugins to libgwenhywfar. +Package: libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 +Section: oldlibs +Architecture: all +Depends: libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60 +Description: AqBanking plugins to libgwenhywfar - transitional dummy package + AqBanking provides a middle layer between the applications + and online banking libraries implementing various file formats and protocols. + Plugins supporting OFX, DTAUS, and HBCI are available. + . + Transitional package for renaming of libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 to + libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60. + Package: libaqbanking-data Section: libs Architecture: all
Bug#705840: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24
Hi again, Am 20.04.2013 21:44, schrieb Micha Lenk: Please unblock package libaqbanking A user reported to me in private that the AqBanking plugins to Gwenhywfar get lost on upgrade from squeezy to wheezy. [...] Sorry, I forgot to mention the bug number of the bug that I want to get fixed in wheezy: It is #705839. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705839 Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5172f1da.6020...@debian.org
Bug#705840: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-4
retitle -1 unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-4 Sorry, I forgot the Debian revision in the version that needs to get unblocked. The full version string is 5.0.24-4. unblock libaqbanking/5.0.24-4 Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5172f3c2.8040...@debian.org
Bug#705846: unblock: libchipcard/5.0.3beta-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libchipcard. A user reported to me in private that the libchipcard plugins to Gwenhywfar get lost on upgrade from squeezy to wheezy. The impact is, that users that want to use AqBanking with a chipcard, AqBanking doesn't work anymore after the upgrade. I reported this issue as #705843 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705843 The reason is that the package libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins got renamed to libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins, but (intentionally) no other package depends or recommends the package libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins. I would like to add a transitional dummy package libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins that depends on libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins, so that AqBanking continues to work for the affected users after upgrades from squeeze to wheezy. unblock libchipcard/5.0.3beta-3 Thanks for considering, Micha diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-12-09 13:43:14.0 +0100 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2013-04-20 20:42:36.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libaqbanking (5.0.24-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add transitional dummy package libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 +(closes: #705839), which existed in squeeze, but was renamed to +libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60 in wheezy. It should help users +upgrading from squeeze to wheezy. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:38:44 +0200 + libaqbanking (5.0.24-3) unstable; urgency=low * Revert injection of build flags from dpkg-buildflags, as requested by the diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control 2012-06-03 19:28:50.0 +0200 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/control 2013-04-20 20:38:00.0 +0200 @@ -86,6 +86,18 @@ . This package contains plugins to libgwenhywfar. +Package: libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 +Section: oldlibs +Architecture: all +Depends: libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60 +Description: AqBanking plugins to libgwenhywfar - transitional dummy package + AqBanking provides a middle layer between the applications + and online banking libraries implementing various file formats and protocols. + Plugins supporting OFX, DTAUS, and HBCI are available. + . + Transitional package for renaming of libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 to + libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60. + Package: libaqbanking-data Section: libs Architecture: all
Bug#705846: unblock: libchipcard/5.0.3beta-3
Sorry again, I accidentally attached the wrong patch file. Please find the correct patch file attached to this message. Regards, Micha Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (Revision 1734) +++ debian/control (Arbeitskopie) @@ -75,3 +75,15 @@ . This package contains plugins to gwenhywfar providing cryptographic services via smartcards. + +Package: libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins +Section: oldlibs +Architecture: all +Depends: libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins +Description: crypttoken plugin to libgwenhywfar - transitional dummy package + libchipcard provides an API for accessing smartcards. Examples are + memory cards, as well as HBCI (home banking), German GeldKarte + (electronic small change), and KVK (health insurance) cards. + . + Transitional package for renaming of libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins to + libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins. Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (Revision 1734) +++ debian/changelog (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libchipcard (5.0.3beta-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add transitional dummy package libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins +(closes: #705843), which existed in squeeze, but was renamed to +libchipcard-libgwenhywfar60-plugins in wheezy. It should help users +upgrading from squeeze to wheezy. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:09:51 +0200 + libchipcard (5.0.3beta-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: Drop +ssh from Vcs-Svn: field to make
Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
Hi Julien, Am 26.11.2012 13:35, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:26:28 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: Hi Adam, On 11/25/2012 09:41 PM CEST +02:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:52 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: This release fixes Debian bug #688831, symlinks in package libaqbanking34-dev pointing to non-existent files (a policy violation). Additionally I changed debian/rules so that it injects build flags from dpkg-buildflags to support the Security Hardening Build Flags, a release goal. Was the hardening change requested by the Security Team? I'm somewhat wary of build-time changes to libraries with reverse dependencies at this point. No, it wasn't. It was just a low hanging fruit, I thought. If you feel uncomfortable with the hardening change, I can upload again with the hardening change reverted. Yes please. I've just uploaded libaqbanking 5.0.24-3 that has the hardening change reverted. Please see the attached diff to the version 5.0.24-1 currently available in testing. Regards, Micha diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-06-03 20:13:45.0 +0200 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-12-09 13:43:14.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +libaqbanking (5.0.24-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Revert injection of build flags from dpkg-buildflags, as requested by the +release team. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:42:14 +0100 + +libaqbanking (5.0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Don't ship symlink /usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so as we don't ship its +destination libaqbankingpp.so.0.0.0 (closes: #688831). + * Inject build flags from dpkg-buildflags, enabling support for the Security +Hardening Build Flag release goal. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:59:15 +0100 + libaqbanking (5.0.24-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-06-03 19:22:11.0 +0200 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-12-09 13:43:14.0 +0100 @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ # Remove .la files for shared plugin libraries find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/gwenhywfar/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \; find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \; + rm -vf $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so override_dh_strip: dh_strip --dbg-package=libaqbanking34-dbg
Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
Hi Adam, On 11/25/2012 09:41 PM CEST +02:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:52 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: This release fixes Debian bug #688831, symlinks in package libaqbanking34-dev pointing to non-existent files (a policy violation). Additionally I changed debian/rules so that it injects build flags from dpkg-buildflags to support the Security Hardening Build Flags, a release goal. Was the hardening change requested by the Security Team? I'm somewhat wary of build-time changes to libraries with reverse dependencies at this point. No, it wasn't. It was just a low hanging fruit, I thought. If you feel uncomfortable with the hardening change, I can upload again with the hardening change reverted. Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50b335c4.4090...@debian.org
Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libaqbanking This release fixes Debian bug #688831, symlinks in package libaqbanking34-dev pointing to non-existent files (a policy violation). Additionally I changed debian/rules so that it injects build flags from dpkg-buildflags to support the Security Hardening Build Flags, a release goal. I uploaded the wanted version 5.0.24-2 already ten days ago to unstable, so for review you can compare the version in testing (5.0.24-1) with the version in unstable (5.0.24-2). The changelog entry of version 5.0.24-2 is: libaqbanking (5.0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Don't ship symlink /usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so as we don't ship its destination libaqbankingpp.so.0.0.0 (closes: #688831). * Inject build flags from dpkg-buildflags, enabling support for the Security Hardening Build Flag release goal. Debdiff is also attached. unblock libaqbanking/5.0.24-2 diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-06-03 20:13:45.0 +0200 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-11-12 22:39:24.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libaqbanking (5.0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Don't ship symlink /usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so as we don't ship its +destination libaqbankingpp.so.0.0.0 (closes: #688831). + * Inject build flags from dpkg-buildflags, enabling support for the Security +Hardening Build Flag release goal. + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:59:15 +0100 + libaqbanking (5.0.24-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules --- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-06-03 19:22:11.0 +0200 +++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-11-12 21:58:28.0 +0100 @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure --max-parallel=1 -- \ + $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) \ --with-backends=aqnone aqhbci aqofxconnect override_dh_auto_test: @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ # Remove .la files for shared plugin libraries find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/gwenhywfar/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \; find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \; + rm -vf $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so override_dh_strip: dh_strip --dbg-package=libaqbanking34-dbg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#676433: nmu: kmymoney_4.6.2-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, there was a new upstream release that introduced a soname bump in libaqbanking. For this reason all packages with build-deps on libaqbanking33-dev needs a source-full upload in order to switch to libaqbanking34-dev and to pick up the dependency on the new package libaqbanking34. The package kmymoney has a build-dep on 'libaqbanking33-dev | libaqbanking-dev'. For this reason I hope that a binNMU is enough as a short term solution to the problem. For the long term solution I filed bug #676430 against the kmymoney package. nmu kmymoney_4.6.2-3 . ALL . -m recompile against the new libaqbanking34-dev Thanks Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120606211034.11879.34032.report...@ian.lenk.info
Bug#676433: nmu: kmymoney_4.6.2-3
Hi Adam, Am 06.06.2012 23:41, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:10 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: there was a new upstream release that introduced a soname bump in libaqbanking. That makes this a(n uncoordinated) transition, not a binNMU request. Thankfully one that doesn't appear to clash with any other ongoing transitions that I can see. Sorry, you're right. I did not anticipate that correctly. Please accept my apologies. For this reason all packages with build-deps on libaqbanking33-dev needs a source-full upload in order to switch to libaqbanking34-dev and to pick up the dependency on the new package libaqbanking34. Why do the -dev package names contain (and therefore change with) the SONAME? Given that they all Provide libaqbanking-dev, could the -dev package not simply be a concrete package named libaqbanking-dev? That also makes transitions much easier and avoids the need for source uploads on each change (unless there are API changes which require the source changes). The package had a rather unstable API change history. For that reason I didn't dare to provide the real -dev package without the SONAME. But recently the API seems to have settled a bit, so I will consider to remove the SONAME from the package name at the next occasion (e.g. the next SONAME bump). The package kmymoney has a build-dep on 'libaqbanking33-dev | libaqbanking-dev'. For this reason I hope that a binNMU is enough as a short term solution to the problem. It's not even a short term solution, I'm afraid. The buildds will only consider the first branch of an alternative build-dependency, which means libaqbanking33-dev will always be installed. Huh, I was afraid that might happen - now it really happened. If the binNMU really isn't sufficient I will raise the severity of #676430 accordingly and do a NMU as needed. What ever, sorry for the mess. Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcfd487.4010...@debian.org
Bug#633486: transition: libdbi
Dear Debian Release Team, I wondered why gnucash could not transition to testing. The reason is the libdbi transition (Debian bug #633486). But apparently all involved packages are ready now, and only need an appropriate hint. Joachim Breitner (nomeata) ran his awesome SAT-Britney, which suggests following hint: easy gnucash/1:2.4.7-1 libdbi/0.8.4-5.1 icinga/1.4.2-1/amd64 icinga/1.4.2-1/i386 icinga/1.4.2-1/ia64 icinga/1.4.2-1/mips rrdtool/1.4.3-3.1/kfreebsd-i386 rrdtool/1.4.3-3.1/sparc syslog-ng/3.2.4-1/armel syslog-ng/3.2.4-1/i386 syslog-ng/3.2.4-1/kfreebsd-amd64 syslog-ng/3.2.4-1/kfreebsd-i386 syslog-ng/3.2.4-1/s390 syslog-ng/3.2.4-1/sparc As this is the output of a program, and not a hand-picked list of packages, please review it carefully. I haven't checked it on my own, but maybe it just does the job... Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e480455.6080...@debian.org
Bug#605237: unblock: wpasupplicant/0.6.10-2.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package wpasupplicant Version 0.6.10-2.1 fixes a regression (bug #582917), which lets WPA authentication fail under some circumstances (read the upstream bug tracker for full details). The patch added by this upload is grabbed from upstream git repository and seems to indeed fix the problem (at least for me). unblock wpasupplicant/0.6.10-2.1 Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101128120205.16460.64978.report...@sheeva.home.lenk.info
Bug#605237: unblock: wpasupplicant/0.6.10-2.1
Hi again, just adding the debian/changelog for the version in question: - 8 --- wpasupplicant (0.6.10-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload approved by Kel Modderman. * Added patch 31_fallback_to_full_EAP_authentication.patch (closes: #582917). - 8 --- Also I would like to add that the bug occurs depending on the used access point. If you use the broken wpasupplicant with an access point that uses EAP for authentication, you will have frequent problems authenticating against it. This is very annoying. Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101128131047.ga15...@mail.lenk.info
Bug#602245: unblock: gnucash/2.2.9-9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package gnucash This version fixes the last remaining RC bug for gnucash. Its debian/changelog entry reads as: gnucash (2.2.9-9) unstable; urgency=low * Added patch 13_fix_double_edit_segfault_bug_593856.dpatch to fix segfault in transaction editing (closes: #593856). * Increased version in build-dep on libglib2.0-dev to avoid segfault on open (Debian bug #587743) if gnucash is built with older libglib2.0-dev versions (makes backporting easier). unblock gnucash/2.2.9-9 Thanks a lot in advance! Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101102215822.13075.28325.report...@ian.lenk.info
Bug#599840: unblock: gnucash/2.2.9-8
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package gnucash This version fixes two release critical bugs. The full debian/changelog entry with all the changes since gnucash 2.2.9-7 reads as follows: gnucash (2.2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low * Fix package name in message about missing AqBanking wizard (closes: #589039). * 12_do_not_accidentally_delete_main_account_file_bug_525549.dpatch added (closes: #525549). * Added shlibs.local entry for libgoffice-0.8-8 because this library provides a shlibs file unconditionally tied to the upstream version (which is more than required by Gnucash). This is a workaround for Debian bug #599225 and should facilitate transition to testing w/o upload via t-p-u. -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:19:22 +0200 Note: Before I added the shlibs.local entry for libgoffice-0.8-8 I checked that the resulting package will be not only installable on Debian Squeeze but also start without a segfault due to unresolved symbols. Additionally please notice that, if bug #599225 were already fixed, the resulting gnucash package would have exactly the same versioned dependency on libgoffice-0.8-8 like it has with this shlibs.local entry. unblock gnucash/2.2.9-8 Thanks for coordinating the release! Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101011183328.9852.92145.report...@ian.lenk.info
Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Julien, Julien Cristau wrote: Micha, could you upload gnucash 2.2.9-7~squeeze1 (or a similar version) to t-p-u? I just uploaded gnucash 2.2.9-7~squeeze1 to testing-proposed-updates. unblock gnucash/2.2.9-7~squeeze1 Regards, Micha -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyRJiAACgkQWN0/4pnhQbSsbwCdHZa8SJfUUCMdvblqfiSWYv72 4JoAnj6nlOg++x0Eg/EEGfdWhDozasSy =rsJB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c912628.9080...@debian.org
Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Julien, Julien Cristau schrieb: Micha, could you upload gnucash 2.2.9-7~squeeze1 (or a similar version) to t-p-u? Will do as soon as I've sorted things out piled up during two weeks of vacation (should happen this week). Regards, Micha -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyM7BQACgkQWN0/4pnhQbTPyACfc6r1iTdooGMnBvLZaWuEIEyk OE8AoLHV4eSbcFbx5fFUf1Q96+Bil+cm =MXJL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8cec1f.7000...@debian.org
Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings
Hi Julien, hi Ray, On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:59:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 19:25:45 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: Hi Release Team, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:06:31 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: Please see the attached debdiff of the changes that I would like to make to the package in Squeeze (via unstable). Please approve for upload. Please upload, and get back to us when the package has been accepted. Gnucash 2.2.9-7 has just been accepted. And unblocked. It picked up a dependency on new goffice: gnucash (2.2.9-6 to 2.2.9-7) Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG Too young, only 8 of 10 days old Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by jcristau Not considered Depends: gnucash goffice (not considered) goffice (0.8.8-1 to 0.8.9-1) Maintainer: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 10 days old (needed 10 days) Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) Not considered Is the new goffice supposed to get in squeeze, or do we have to go through t-p-u for gnucash? I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze release (and you just forgot to ask Debian Release for a freeze exception) or is it intended for Debian sid only? Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100829143401.ga14...@mail.lenk.info
Bug#593850: unblock: libktoblzcheck/1.28-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package libktoblzcheck Reasons: - upstream released some days ago - upstream update contains *only* following changes: + quarterly update of bankdata.txt (origin: Deutsche Bundesbank) + bugfix for one check method Thanks in advance, Micha unblock libktoblzcheck/1.28-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100821153024.4462.66203.report...@ian.lenk.info
Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings
Hi Release Team, Micha Lenk schrieb: To avoid countless bug reports on Gnucash once Debian Squeeze is released I would like to backport this patch for the Gnucash package in Squeeze. I believe this will be fairly easy because there were very few changes to the aqbanking plugin since Gnucash 2.2.9 has been released. However, I would like to get approval from the Debian Release team in advance, that this patch will be accepted as freeze exception for Debian Squeeze. Please see the attached debdiff of the changes that I would like to make to the package in Squeeze (via unstable). Please approve for upload. Regards, Micha diff -u gnucash-2.2.9/debian/changelog gnucash-2.2.9/debian/changelog --- gnucash-2.2.9/debian/changelog +++ gnucash-2.2.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gnucash (2.2.9-7) unstable; urgency=low + + * Added patch 11_migrate_AqBanking_configuration_bug_593544.dpatch for +migrating old AqBanking configuration on upgrade (closes: #593544). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@debian.org Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:40:23 +0200 + gnucash (2.2.9-6) unstable; urgency=low * Added patch 10_fix_broken_SCIM_input_bug_587298 to fix SCIM input diff -u gnucash-2.2.9/debian/patches/00list gnucash-2.2.9/debian/patches/00list --- gnucash-2.2.9/debian/patches/00list +++ gnucash-2.2.9/debian/patches/00list @@ -5,0 +6 @@ +11_migrate_AqBanking_configuration_bug_593544.dpatch only in patch2: unchanged: --- gnucash-2.2.9.orig/debian/patches/11_migrate_AqBanking_configuration_bug_593544.dpatch +++ gnucash-2.2.9/debian/patches/11_migrate_AqBanking_configuration_bug_593544.dpatch @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run +Description: Check for and migrate old AqBanking configuration on first start +Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com +Origin: http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2010-August/029265.html +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593544 +Applied-Upstream: http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-changes/2010-August/008558.html + +...@dpatch@ + +diff --git a/src/import-export/aqbanking/gnc-ab-utils.c b/src/import-export/aqbanking/gnc-ab-utils.c +index 0133c8a..1b43b01 100644 +--- a/src/import-export/aqbanking/gnc-ab-utils.c b/src/import-export/aqbanking/gnc-ab-utils.c +@@ -120,6 +120,29 @@ gnc_AB_BANKING_new(void) + api = AB_Banking_new(gnucash, NULL, 0); + g_return_val_if_fail(api, NULL); + ++#ifdef AQBANKING_VERSION_4_PLUS ++/* Check for config migration */ ++if (AB_Banking_HasConf4(api, 0) != 0) ++{ ++if (AB_Banking_HasConf3(api, 0) == 0) ++{ ++g_message(gnc_AB_BANKING_new: importing aqbanking3 configuration\n); ++if (AB_Banking_ImportConf3(api, 0) 0) ++{ ++g_message(gnc_AB_BANKING_new: unable to import aqbanking3 configuration\n); ++} ++} ++else if (AB_Banking_HasConf2(api, 0) == 0) ++{ ++g_message(gnc_AB_BANKING_new: importing aqbanking2 configuration\n); ++if (AB_Banking_ImportConf2(api, 0) 0) ++{ ++g_message(gnc_AB_BANKING_new: unable to import aqbanking2 configuration\n); ++} ++} ++} ++#endif /* AQBANKING_VERSION_4_PLUS */ ++ + /* Init the API */ + g_return_val_if_fail(AB_Banking_Init(api) == 0, NULL); + signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Release Team, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:06:31 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: Please see the attached debdiff of the changes that I would like to make to the package in Squeeze (via unstable). Please approve for upload. Please upload, and get back to us when the package has been accepted. Gnucash 2.2.9-7 has just been accepted. Regards, Micha -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxtaRMACgkQWN0/4pnhQbTDkgCgtw/gyQyRXahqL7vvXUpptSIo y+YAnj6n6a0LkXQB+Gze3HlSvJncEmE0 =aOiz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6d6919.5060...@debian.org
proposed update of libaqbanking for lenny
Dear release masters, libaqbanking 3.6.2-1 in Debian Lenny suffers a RC bug (#505509) causing qt3-wizard, a little setup helper application, to segfault. The reason is the use of an unassigned variable. The attached patch libaqbanking_3.6.2-1+lenny1.interdiff.diff fixes this issue. The proposed debian/changelog entry is: libaqbanking (3.6.2-1+lenny1) stable; urgency=low * Apply upstream patch (SVN r1538) fixing forgotten variable assignment causing qt3-wizard to segfault (closes: #505509). -- Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:24:13 +0200 Is it worth an upload to stable? Regards Micha diff -u libaqbanking-3.6.2/debian/changelog libaqbanking-3.6.2/debian/changelog --- libaqbanking-3.6.2/debian/changelog +++ libaqbanking-3.6.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libaqbanking (3.6.2-1+lenny1) stable; urgency=low + + * Apply upstream patch (SVN r1538) fixing forgotten variable +assignment causing qt3-wizard to segfault (closes: #505509). + + -- Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:24:13 +0200 + libaqbanking (3.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release, fixing several crashes. only in patch2: unchanged: --- libaqbanking-3.6.2.orig/src/plugins/backends/aqofxconnect/plugin/account.c +++ libaqbanking-3.6.2/src/plugins/backends/aqofxconnect/plugin/account.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ AB_PROVIDER_EXTEND_MODE em, GWEN_DB_NODE *db) { AO_ACCOUNT *ae; + assert(a); if (em==AB_ProviderExtendMode_Create || em==AB_ProviderExtendMode_Extend) { @@ -51,6 +52,8 @@ } else if (em==AB_ProviderExtendMode_Save) { +ae = GWEN_INHERIT_GETDATA(AB_ACCOUNT, AO_ACCOUNT, a); +assert(ae); GWEN_DB_SetIntValue(db, GWEN_DB_FLAGS_OVERWRITE_VARS, maxPurposeLines, ae-maxPurposeLines); GWEN_DB_SetIntValue(db, GWEN_DB_FLAGS_OVERWRITE_VARS, signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
SONAME change for libaqbanking
Hi Release Team, I want to apologize for not coordinating the upload of libaqbanking 3.8.2-1 with you in advance. This upload introduces a SONAME bump of libqbanking5 - libqbanking6 which affects the packages qbankmanager and kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking. Both packages depend on libqbanking5 which does not exist in unstable anymore. Hence both need a binNMU (there are no bugs filed yet). Please be so kind and schedule the following binNMUs: qbankmanager_0.9.50-1, Rebuild against newer libaqbanking, 1, all kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking_0.9.9beta-1, Rebuild against newer libaqbanking, 1, all Thank you very much. Regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#482629: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking: FTBFS with kmymoney2 0.9-1: Missing header files
Adeodato Simó wrote: It is. So I will upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates. If you mean It is == the change in Build-Depends is strictly needed, then please explain what you mean. The change in Build-Depends is strictly needed because the build result will not be compatible (in the sense of working for the user) depending on whether the plugin has been built with kmymoney2 0.8.9 or kmymoney2 = 0.9. Regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#482629: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking: FTBFS with kmymoney2 0.9-1: Missing header files
Hi, Adeodato Simó wrote: The change in Build-Depends is strictly needed because the build result will not be compatible (in the sense of working for the user) depending on whether the plugin has been built with kmymoney2 0.8.9 or kmymoney2 = 0.9. That is already covered for via Depends, ain't it? For the binary package: yes. For the source package I agree it would work with newer versions too, but, as said above, with a different result, i. e. with inapropriate dependencies in the binary package (mind the ugly shlibs.local file). That's why I decided to do it this way. Regarding the shlibs.local file: This should go away some time in the future. As soon as the kmymoney plugin API has stabilisized (i.e. no strict versions needed for every patchlevel upstream update) I will trust the kmymoney2 maintainers to handle a shlibs file correctly in the kmymoney2 package. (No offense intended, I just made the observation that I'm following upstream development more tightly than the kmymoney2 maintainers). And right now kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking seems to be the only package build-depending on kmymoney2. Regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#482629: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking: FTBFS with kmymoney2 0.9-1: Missing header files
Hi, Adeodato Simó schrieb: So may I kindly ask: Would the release team issue a freeze-exception for the following patch in Lenny (via TPU)?: Yes, though I don't think the change in Build-Depends is strictly needed. It is. So I will upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates. Regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#482629: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking: FTBFS with kmymoney2 0.9-1: Missing header files
Hi, Mark Purcell schrieb: On Saturday 24 May 2008 10:56:19 Micha Lenk wrote: Version: 0.9.6beta-4 The package kmymoney2 0.9-1 ships without header files and all the other development files shipped in earlier versions (see #482625). Hence this package fails to build from source: This bug doesn't effect lenny. kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (0.9.6beta-4) builds with kmymoney2 (0.8.9-1) both of which are in lenny. The bug is about building kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking with kmymoney2/sid. Just for the records: I filed the bug because at that time it was not at all clear (at least not to me) that kmymoney2 0.9-2 will not make it into Lenny. But then there came the other FTBFS bug (#490241) preventing the migration of kmymoney2 0.9-2 to Lenny. This is kind of a mini transition: kmymoney2 should not get updated in Lenny/Squeeze without kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking being updated too. But I believe we don't need to enforce it by technical means... Regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#482629: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking: FTBFS with kmymoney2 0.9-1: Missing header files
Hi, On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:33:28PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Micha Lenk [Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:40:09 +0100]: This is kind of a mini transition: kmymoney2 should not get updated in Lenny/Squeeze without kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking being updated too. But I believe we don't need to enforce it by technical means... What I intended to say here: I believe we don't need to make use of the transition tool [0]introduced some time ago, which would reject uploads until the transition is complete... 0. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/04/msg00282.html If a user of kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking would see things break (as in, the plugin would stop working for them) if they upgrade kmymoney2 but not the plugin package, then it is compulsory that you enforce it by technical means, making it impossible via dependencies to upgrade kmymoney2 without upgrading kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking. ... and this idea didn't come to my mind yet -- thanks for the hint. But I had no opportunity to know in advance that kmymoeny2 0.9 would break kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking 0.9.6beta-4. So may I kindly ask: Would the release team issue a freeze-exception for the following patch in Lenny (via TPU)?: -- 8 - Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (Revision 964) +++ debian/control (Arbeitskopie) @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: extra Maintainer: Micha Lenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev, cdbs, dpatch, kdelibs4-dev, - qt3-dev-tools, kmymoney2 (= 0.8.9), libgwenhywfar47-dev, libaqbanking20-dev + qt3-dev-tools, kmymoney2 (= 0.8.9), kmymoney2 ( 0.9), libgwenhywfar47-dev, libaqbanking20-dev Standards-Version: 3.7.3 XS-Dm-Upload-Allowed: yes Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog(Revision 964) +++ debian/changelog(Arbeitskopie) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (0.9.6beta-5) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low + + * debian/control: (Build-)Depend on kmymoney2 0.9 +(otherwise this package will become unuable on kmymoney2-only upgrades). + + -- Micha Lenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:38:06 +0100 + kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (0.9.6beta-4) unstable; urgency=low * Mention GFDL licensed documents in debian/copyright. Index: debian/shlibs.local === --- debian/shlibs.local (Revision 964) +++ debian/shlibs.local (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -libkmm_mymoney 0 kmymoney2 (= 0.8.9) -libkmm_plugin 0 kmymoney2 (= 0.8.9) +libkmm_mymoney 0 kmymoney2 (= 0.8.9), kmymoney2 ( 0.9) +libkmm_plugin 0 kmymoney2 (= 0.8.9), kmymoney2 ( 0.9) -- 8 - Besides this being a good exercise for me, I am not really convinced that it's worth the effort. For Lenny it would not change anything at all (because kmymoney2 = 0.9 will not migrate to Lenny due to #503654). So the only effect would be sometime post Lenny. AFAIUI this change would prevent kmymoney2 = 0.9 to migrate to Squeeze before an accordingly recent kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking is ready for Squeeze too. Is this really the whole point or do I miss something? Regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Release exception for libchipcard 4.1.3-2
Hi release team, I've just uploaded libchipcard 4.1.3-2 which fixes bug #495452: Title: libchipcard-tools: leaves behind communication socket after purge Severity: important Justification: release goal piuparts-clean archive User: debian-release@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts-stable-upgrade The attached SVN commit message contains the changes introduced with this upload. Please issue a freeze exception for libchipcard 4.1.3-2 in order to let the fix migrate to Lenny. Thanks Micha ---BeginMessage--- Author: mlenk-guest Date: 2008-08-17 20:47:25 + (Sun, 17 Aug 2008) New Revision: 905 Modified: libchipcard/trunk/debian/changelog libchipcard/trunk/debian/libchipcard-tools.postrm Log: libchipcard-tools: Remove stale IPC socket file in postrm script on purge (closes: #495452). Modified: libchipcard/trunk/debian/changelog === --- libchipcard/trunk/debian/changelog 2008-08-15 13:56:20 UTC (rev 904) +++ libchipcard/trunk/debian/changelog 2008-08-17 20:47:25 UTC (rev 905) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libchipcard (4.1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * libchipcard-tools: Remove stale IPC socket file in postrm script on purge +(closes: #495452). + + -- Micha Lenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:38:29 +0200 + libchipcard (4.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release Modified: libchipcard/trunk/debian/libchipcard-tools.postrm === --- libchipcard/trunk/debian/libchipcard-tools.postrm 2008-08-15 13:56:20 UTC (rev 904) +++ libchipcard/trunk/debian/libchipcard-tools.postrm 2008-08-17 20:47:25 UTC (rev 905) @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ case $1 in purge) rm -f /etc/udev/rules.d/025_libchipcard.rules +rm -f /var/run/chipcard/chipcard.comm ;; remove|upgrade|failed-upgrade|abort-install|abort-upgrade|disappear) ___ Aqbanking-commit mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/aqbanking-commit ---End Message--- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Stable-proposed update of libchipcard2 (fixing #457412)
Hi Release Managers, I propose an update of libchipcard2 in Debian Etch in order to fix bug #457412. You can find the output of command debdiff libchipcard2_2.1.9-2.dsc libchipcard2_2.1.9-3.dsc attached to this mail and online here: http://micha.lenk.info/debian/stable/debdiff_on_dscs_output.txt You can grab the source package here: http://micha.lenk.info/debian/stable/libchipcard2_2.1.9-3.dsc Please note that this upload also fixes the maintainer - unfortunately this change didn't made it into Etch. And according to luk it's going to be okay to change it in this update too. Where should I upload the updated package to? Will Debian Maintainer privileges be sufficient for this upload? Regards Micha This is the output of the command debdiff libchipcard2_2.1.9-2.dsc libchipcard2_2.1.9-3.dsc: diff -u libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/control libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/control --- libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/control +++ libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/control @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ Source: libchipcard2 Section: libs Priority: optional -Maintainer: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Uploaders: Micha Lenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] +Maintainer: Micha Lenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), cdbs, libgwenhywfar38-dev (= 2.3), libusb-dev (= 2:0.1.10a-9), libssl-dev, libsysfs-dev, gawk Standards-Version: 3.7.2 @@ -21,7 +20,7 @@ Package: libchipcard2-0c2 Section: libs Architecture: any -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} +Depends: libchipcard2-data, ${shlibs:Depends} Conflicts: libchipcard2-0 Replaces: libchipcard2-0 Priority: optional diff -u libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/changelog libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/changelog --- libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/changelog +++ libchipcard2-2.1.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libchipcard2 (2.1.9-3) stable; urgency=low + + * Let libchipcard2-0c2 depend on libchipcard2-data. Otherwise applications +linking against libchipcard2 suffer from segfaults when libchipcard2-data +is not installed (closes: #457412). + * Set myself as maintainer. Thanks to Thomas for his contributions so far. + + -- Micha Lenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:58:18 +0100 + libchipcard2 (2.1.9-2) unstable; urgency=high * Rewrite udev rules generator to prevent wrong record showing up.
Re: kbanking
Hello Mark and Thomas, Mark Purcell schrieb: My one query is Does kmymoney2 build with kbanking from aqbanking? Do you have some test debs I can look into? The packages I've build and checked in to svn.debian.org are available under http://aqbanking.alioth.debian.org/unstable/ So I'd like to know: - Mark, would you mind if libaqbanking provided libkbanking1? I am happy for libaqbanking to provide libkbanking1, provided kmymoney2 will build. I've tried to build kmymoney2 (release version 0.8) with the libkbanking1-package I've build from AqBanking source. The build succeded, but I've not been able to use kmymoney2 with my already configured AqBanking accounts since the context menu entry for connecting KMyMoney2 accounts to AqBanking accounts is disabled. I haven't had enough time yet for figuring out whether this was my fault or not... Mark, I would appreciate it if you could test whether the packages are ready for use with KMyMoney2... I'm unsure if you will need to use some special Replaces: Conflicts: headers because we are effectivly merging two upstream sources. Hmm, I don't know either, but since the packagename remains the same I think it might suffice to ask ftp-master (?) to remove all libkbanking packages from the Debian archives and upload the new AqBanking packages providing the additional package libkbanking1. If and when Mark and the release team give their OK, I'd upload aqbanking with kbanking today. Thomas, if you agree with the changes (have a look at the SVN changelogs) I've made in the packages mentioned above, and if Mark has no objections please upload them. :) Yours Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]