Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Fri, September 28, 2012 07:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Is adding the epoch any more involved than just changing the version number, from a packaging point of view? If not, then doing that today would indeed be one way out of the issue, depending on your opinion of doing so, with your maintainer hat on. Well, my maintenance has mostly been limited to making the stable uploads, and that was actually my reason for joining the team in the first place. However, I'm going to take this action. I think the suggestion of the epoch in unstable was a good one anyway, and in any case we'll have more time to sort out the situation in unstable - we don't have that time for the point release now, so resolving this takes precedence for me. Apologies for not spotting the problem before accepting the packages. :-( It's a pity none of the people involved spotted it, including myself, but that's done now. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0e9b7460da47fc09401b7129f3adf21e.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On 28.09.2012 07:55, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Fri, September 28, 2012 07:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Is adding the epoch any more involved than just changing the version number, from a packaging point of view? If not, then doing that today would indeed be one way out of the issue, depending on your opinion of doing so, with your maintainer hat on. Well, my maintenance has mostly been limited to making the stable uploads, and that was actually my reason for joining the team in the first place. Ah, okay. However, I'm going to take this action. I think the suggestion of the epoch in unstable was a good one anyway, and in any case we'll have more time to sort out the situation in unstable - we don't have that time for the point release now, so resolving this takes precedence for me. Thanks very much. I'm aiming to set some time aside soon to review where we are with getting the new ia32-libs* into wheezy. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7b8944ede5e203fb2c5fd2fbd6e78...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:53 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. [...] ok, please upload as soon as possible (i.e. today). Thanks - uploaded. Unfortunately, this leaves us with a bit of an issue, given the imminence of a point release; namely: ia32-libs | 20120102 |stable | source, amd64, ia64 ia32-libs | 20120102 | testing | source, amd64, ia64 ia32-libs | 20120701 | unstable | source, amd64 ia32-libs | 20120926 | proposed-updates | source, amd64, ia64 As far as I can see, the choices we have are: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to unstable - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version scheme... Thoughts / preferences welcome. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348771978.28872.7.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:53 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. [...] ok, please upload as soon as possible (i.e. today). Thanks - uploaded. Unfortunately, this leaves us with a bit of an issue, given the imminence of a point release; namely: ia32-libs | 20120102 |stable | source, amd64, ia64 ia32-libs | 20120102 | testing | source, amd64, ia64 ia32-libs | 20120701 | unstable | source, amd64 ia32-libs | 20120926 | proposed-updates | source, amd64, ia64 As far as I can see, the choices we have are: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to unstable - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version scheme... Right... this worked in the past but fails now there's been some action on ia32-libs in sid. I can upload a new version (20120102+squeeze1 I propose), do you need to reject the current upload first? Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91c3f2ce8dc1872426501e486de473b4.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to unstable - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version scheme... Right... this worked in the past but fails now there's been some action on ia32-libs in sid. I can upload a new version (20120102+squeeze1 I propose), do you need to reject the current upload first? It's already in proposed-updates, so out of our hands to do anything about it; we can't reject it and a new upload to p-u would need a higher version than what's currently there. :-( I don't know if ftp-master could do anything about it, but even so dropping the current version doesn't quite feel right. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348778311.28872.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Thu, September 27, 2012 22:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to unstable - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version scheme... Right... this worked in the past but fails now there's been some action on ia32-libs in sid. I can upload a new version (20120102+squeeze1 I propose), do you need to reject the current upload first? It's already in proposed-updates, so out of our hands to do anything about it; we can't reject it and a new upload to p-u would need a higher version than what's currently there. :-( Let me know when I can do something. FWIW, there has already been a proposal to epoch the sid version of ia32-libs for different reasons (#688915), so perhaps the route to accept this version in squeeze and wheezy may be viable. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b5e1c16d4b7972926a5c6cb8e062cddd.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 06:56 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 22:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to unstable - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. Of course there aren't ia64 packages in unstable any more, so this would only need the maintainer amd64 upload. Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version scheme... Right... this worked in the past but fails now there's been some action on ia32-libs in sid. I can upload a new version (20120102+squeeze1 I propose), do you need to reject the current upload first? It's already in proposed-updates, so out of our hands to do anything about it; we can't reject it and a new upload to p-u would need a higher version than what's currently there. :-( Let me know when I can do something. FWIW, there has already been a proposal to epoch the sid version of ia32-libs for different reasons (#688915), so perhaps the route to accept this version in squeeze and wheezy may be viable. Is adding the epoch any more involved than just changing the version number, from a packaging point of view? If not, then doing that today would indeed be one way out of the issue, depending on your opinion of doing so, with your maintainer hat on. Apologies for not spotting the problem before accepting the packages. :-( Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348808640.28872.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, September 17, 2012 15:58, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release. Attached is the proposed changelog entry. Let me know when I can upload. Cheers, Thijs ia32-libs Description: Binary data
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
Hi, On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release. Attached is the proposed changelog entry. Let me know when I can upload. ok, please upload as soon as possible (i.e. today). Thanks Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release. Attached is the proposed changelog entry. Let me know when I can upload. ok, please upload as soon as possible (i.e. today). Thanks - uploaded. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5e348fbaa972dbe939a850e9acd2ac34.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On 26.09.2012 11:53, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release. Attached is the proposed changelog entry. Let me know when I can upload. ok, please upload as soon as possible (i.e. today). Thanks - uploaded. Thanks for the quick turnaround; flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e3e6cea9818f2979de5f1f680638b...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On 09/23/2012 06:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Any comment from -live? 29th is fine. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/506063d4.6050...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload? afaik, that's correct. Cool; thanks. All of the kernel builds are (finally) in now; would you have time to take care of the lkdi uploads? Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348523640.6724.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload? afaik, that's correct. Cool; thanks. All of the kernel builds are (finally) in now; would you have time to take care of the lkdi uploads? Yep, should after work today. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120925002142.ga26...@dannf.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me pretty busy throught the work week. Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348418361.21568.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 15:59 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a change staged for the next point release. That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29. Any comment from -live? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348418439.21568.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:59:09 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a change staged for the next point release. That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29. Just because I'm lurking, Sept 29th is fine for Emdebian Grip 2.0.6 too. I'll be brushing up the necessary updates tomorrow ready for a simple pull on the day. (BTW, Wheezy will still be 3.0.0 for us - we'll get back into step with Jessie as 8.0.0 via the new dak support. We can skip 4, 5, 6 7.) -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgp5Aflh0KjSZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me pretty busy throught the work week. Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload? afaik, that's correct. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120924000123.ga14...@dannf.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a change staged for the next point release. p-u-NEW will close on the weekend of Sep 22nd/23rd (barring any breakage induced by the ftp-master meeting ;-). Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me pretty busy throught the work week. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120918173003.gf4...@dannf.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:43 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side This is looking like the favourite so far, which would mean having p-u ready and closed next weekend. * Oct 6/7: Adam's busy for the weekend, hence we'd like to avoid that if possible * Oct 13/14: BSP attended by adsb/Sledge, not ideal to schedule it there [...] Dear Kernel team: Which changes are still pending for 6.0.6? When could we get them into the archive? For 22nd we'd close p-u-NEW on the 15th, which would leave us with a week. -kernel / -live ping? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1347706305.28617.40.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th Available that weekend fine. * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side Available that weekend fine. * Oct 6/7: Adam's busy for the weekend, hence we'd like to avoid that if possible Ditto, I'm guessing the same event :-) * Oct 13/14: BSP attended by adsb/Sledge, not ideal to schedule it there Worked OK at the last BSP we did, tbh... So dear FTP masters, CD team, Press team: Would one out of Sep 22/29/30 work out for all of you? Dear Kernel team: Which changes are still pending for 6.0.6? When could we get them into the archive? For 22nd we'd close p-u-NEW on the 15th, which would leave us with a week. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com C++ ate my sanity -- Jon Rabone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120914122252.gc24...@einval.com
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On 12962 March 1977, Philipp Kern wrote: I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th Right after the ftpmaster meeting. Might work. * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side Works for me. * Oct 6/7: Adam's busy for the weekend, hence we'd like to avoid that if possible * Oct 13/14: BSP attended by adsb/Sledge, not ideal to schedule it there Not in October. -- bye, Joerg Thats all. Just a few questions about your package and then we got it and you will be in DAMINATION :). I have no idea what DAMINATION is but it sounds cool. Let's get going. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sjaojnho@gkar.ganneff.de
Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
Hi, I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side * Oct 6/7: Adam's busy for the weekend, hence we'd like to avoid that if possible * Oct 13/14: BSP attended by adsb/Sledge, not ideal to schedule it there So dear FTP masters, CD team, Press team: Would one out of Sep 22/29/30 work out for all of you? Dear Kernel team: Which changes are still pending for 6.0.6? When could we get them into the archive? For 22nd we'd close p-u-NEW on the 15th, which would leave us with a week. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
