Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 09/11/2013 06:02 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Hi, two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition: - libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is virtually non-existant. Well the patch for boost problem is uploaded into debian (built in a jessie chroot / against older libav that is). Such that to prevent erroneous FTBFS attribution to earlier boost failure in the build process. This was available since August 27th in Ubuntu, but not uploaded into debian as I couldn't build the package in sid as it FTBFS against libav 9. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with libav API changes to port libavg, I'll poke upstream about it, but at the moment I'm tagging libavg FTBFS against libav 9 bug with help. Is there a libav 9 porting guide available somewhere? Or can someone help out with a patch to fix libav 9 FTBFS? Also, why did libavg was removed from testing? Was it actually blocking any removals from the archive and/or transitions? As far as I can see all libraries that libavg binaries are linked against are still present in sid. This haste removal seems inconsistent to me w.r.t. how other transitions library removals are handled by the release team. ps. Popcon is virtually non-existant because virtually libavg has only been recently reintroduced in debian after having been away for a long time. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhluhj_cv+fgjyqx5s7osxql2m41d8-qgkgzckxygzian...@mail.gmail.com
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: gxine_0.5.907-2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vopd1-0003ek...@franck.debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit : However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the old version of XCP 1.3.2 in testing if that helps, plus add some blocking bugs so that the rest of Debian isn't affected by the (not finished) work on XCP 1.6 for Debian. More than two weeks later, xen-api is still in testing, and preventing the start of the OCaml transition. If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, nova-compute-xen. xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf package and could be removed from testing. On the other hand, both nova-* packages are built by nova which Julien wants to keep in testing. The last changelog entry advertises the removal of nova-xcp-plugins, but it is still there. Thomas, could you please upload a new nova without nova-xcp-plugins and nova-compute-xen? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52419829.2090...@debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, nova-compute-xen. xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf package and could be removed from testing. On the other hand, both nova-* packages are built by nova which Julien wants to keep in testing. The last changelog entry advertises the removal of nova-xcp-plugins, but it is still there. On the other hand, if removing nova is accepted, it seems that novnc is the only reverse dependency. To summarize, at the moment, (at least) the following packages need to be removed (or fixed) from testing to proceed: xen-api, guest-templates, nova and novnc. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52419bf5.3020...@debian.org
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)
[added CC to debian-mips, please don't shoot me for cross-posting] Graham == Graham Whaley graham.wha...@gmail.com writes: I need to update you on the state of Debian support commitment within Imagination, particularly in light of the plight of MIPS support for jessie. Having become aware of this situation, I am working internally to accelerate Imaginations existing Debian support group plans. This will cover both engineering resource and hardware availability. It will take a few days for us to work this through, and as soon as I have some news I will post to this list. Hi Graham, nice to hear that there is somebody still interested in Debian-mips. Already started thinking I'd end up with a non-supported software for my MIPS hardware in the long-run. [..] For those of you who wish to do some mips/mipsel work or testing (thanks :-), but are short of hardware, I'll see what I can do there as well. Let me know if you are interested Given the seemingly dormant interest in Debian MIPS I'll see whether I can allocate more time myself to help with porting and fixing. I'm already eying Loongson-3A based hardware (heard that Lemote has Mini-ITX boards available) to replace/augment my Fuloong 6004 system. For MIPS-enthusiasts: tekmote is currently selling quadcore MIPS64 notebooks for 600 EUR: http://www.tekmote.nl/epages/61504599.sf/nl_NL/?ObjectPath=/Shops/61504599/Products/CFL-008 IMO without a Debian MIPS64 port, Debian won't be viable for high end MIPS equipment before soon, and is going to loose a lot of interested developers. cheers, David -- GnuPG public key: http://dvdkhlng.users.sourceforge.net/dk2.gpg Fingerprint: B63B 6AF2 4EEB F033 46F7 7F1D 935E 6F08 E457 205F pgpn1X7nKrgBB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#724508: nmu: libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Seems like 1.09-3 is again built against Perl 5.14. Please nmu libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3 . amd64 . -m Rebuild against Perl 5.18. (Alexander, please update your build enviroment.) Cheers, gregor - -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSQajMAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGI0AP/R4J3NHyVLtsYCNQIJxsS9iB EjAxcrU4BzPfVLJEmlzQ8kzsFP2WQIBI88siWxrPMHitDFLDXR/HvB8VQc9x+AhE 2Z22MC5ZbKnm5Ead4JBIeHfc+8mw7q9FytZgkW1doXWWFpW+I0W5sq+hWShnhhb/ FxvJeV3sNgHBRVushgdY8hiU5fMhOcflvZ4dyh95jLa7wGON0OXpW5ZkVKtbdcCz IRGlIoVcUecVW9MGg8V4lBoeddrOT5Ohh4m4RX4oYJ2F3IUhB9z38+idmRX3u2Xb bRsiPqiFfmcuwVg26MCtdqt7UAD9eEylvQHEcynQAa4PNq2qyKzzFfSc8K9+5CAX csp1lQe793UJ3V/C/AEWIbD8aMWt+NnRNLG6UZYSGUt94mgUkVDxdv0Bu6AOvgkH eMTPX/a3LXtrk262okmMerYQRO8TY8m9LW1S5wFKlNLlkvC3JV0YJYPo55cbVifU c32HD4wep0Af2pRlq8pHUrO02JHOe2EhICxiHcePhbCrKuPWBu/nJiryFEOA8+2i qoHXBh9yRu1gP8rri0irJYP355nsAE1CMx6MJriuonDvSchLBg8+Oj1R+uTRPP31 E87J44n3aQjyoi/zhomi6qmKe4QD626O0cofvi1ps1kkgQGozu3etitVRkYZUAwx 9c5U1IMabKe2nbMbbVFf =0VTp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130924145924.13311.95061.report...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hi, I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the Hurd. I do some test on QEMU and public Hurd host. I am familiar with system programming and have some embedded and printer driver development experience. I use Linux for 11 year, family with cross compiling tool chain. I never contributed to Debian before, I read Debian developer guide and GNU maintainer guide recently. I want to focus on system usable issue like GUI or driver issue and back to Hurd itself if needed. I also wan't to make system clear for new comer. I am not a DD/DM Cong Zhang 2013/9/1 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an overview of which of the porters are (still) active for each port. Once the results from the role-call are in, we will request other information about the status of the ports. In the meantime, feel free to update and collect info about the ports in the Debian wiki[WIKI]. If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in the port to the Release Team debian-release@lists.debian.org before 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of your involvement in the port. Feel free to use the following template as your reply: Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For ARCH, I - test (most|all) packages on this architecture - fix toolchain issues - triage arch-specific bugs - fix arch-related bugs - maintain buildds - ... I am a DD|I am a DM|I am not a DD/DM YOUR NAME Niels, on behalf of the release team [LAST-BITS] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg6.html [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSIu2TAAoJEAVLu599gGRC86EP/j/7FEZ9pxpTEHrBI41GTu6r nENS5kAZAuxFQHfYLtKexBcgneGd6cgdmr3cIoh1ZL9lJgXq74X8FL5IbWNqUw9S o9UQWpZJiwIIlH4fqSgFVLIphI0DQr7dXI7xcDIm4kl6Fdruo1tGxX8xqL23jzdP nQb3jrXv3bj5943MfWeCbODILv2N6qev9VtWeQ6Wmh8PvxRUl7VqgdQaeHtlMsUp TQT5fz0cw8gc2amlwlOZxaGDV2C8mHboJIKMEsu79BK4SlFSED9rXn4juFPUnAgG uADsMdBBqEIgSMN42cPHQju+KLfJe/+xScmlzzDS/d7aWWs02TibcQ1ZnPi+bcgp bd/Wa0lms+Fc2OpcuFle9Lwo+2B+ka1Dd3itm+D0SbmrxoGi6CuMMwydLcQbSJ73 hHw9HJEIQr2x/ZItNPJrSvvj50rwYXcmFbxtVAwv2pFXfQ37iukYgAaaMvnwpNNJ 6dM1coCF9skNkXLO8rkZ+5aupGgjpS9BdKKAEQrPy/aoaW9KNCZrLQeA4C3QySBU OcCNBv7taSjVAVNszKtRIQpu2gzFGAV0u9Gj41qW1JzDHYrmAvMyGxrndOxTmaFr p05QWgcMsPhNvdHjd6sWLyzJ5NYUKksCPMRgCc0BEd6moIyrt7UFsp2+guJZPBJ0 pffEJGK2iGtrWmJfElof =TUeZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130901073351.a92862...@thykier.net
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)
Hi David. Good timing. I needed to update everybody on the status. I now have allocation for two full time permanent hires for Debian MIPS work in my group, and will be placing those job adverts on the imgtec web site as soon as I can (in the next few days), and posting those links to the debian-jobs mailing list. I also have allocation for MIPS native build hardware. I need to discuss the present situation of the MIPS hardware within Debian, and how we can proceed to improve that situation. I've not identified who within Debian I need to discuss this with - if anybody could point me in the right direction or contact me directly then that would be very appreciated. In the interim a couple of my team should be contacting the Debian Release Team so we can resource MIPS for jessie whilst we get the new team formed and up to speed. Graham On 24 September 2013 15:25, David Kuehling dvdkh...@posteo.de wrote: [added CC to debian-mips, please don't shoot me for cross-posting] Graham == Graham Whaley graham.wha...@gmail.com writes: I need to update you on the state of Debian support commitment within Imagination, particularly in light of the plight of MIPS support for jessie. Having become aware of this situation, I am working internally to accelerate Imaginations existing Debian support group plans. This will cover both engineering resource and hardware availability. It will take a few days for us to work this through, and as soon as I have some news I will post to this list. Hi Graham, nice to hear that there is somebody still interested in Debian-mips. Already started thinking I'd end up with a non-supported software for my MIPS hardware in the long-run. [..] For those of you who wish to do some mips/mipsel work or testing (thanks :-), but are short of hardware, I'll see what I can do there as well. Let me know if you are interested Given the seemingly dormant interest in Debian MIPS I'll see whether I can allocate more time myself to help with porting and fixing. I'm already eying Loongson-3A based hardware (heard that Lemote has Mini-ITX boards available) to replace/augment my Fuloong 6004 system. For MIPS-enthusiasts: tekmote is currently selling quadcore MIPS64 notebooks for 600 EUR: http://www.tekmote.nl/epages/61504599.sf/nl_NL/?ObjectPath=/Shops/61504599/Products/CFL-008 IMO without a Debian MIPS64 port, Debian won't be viable for high end MIPS equipment before soon, and is going to loose a lot of interested developers. cheers, David -- GnuPG public key: http://dvdkhlng.users.sourceforge.net/dk2.gpg Fingerprint: B63B 6AF2 4EEB F033 46F7 7F1D 935E 6F08 E457 205F
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
On 09/24/2013 10:04 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, nova-compute-xen. xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf package and could be removed from testing. On the other hand, both nova-* packages are built by nova which Julien wants to keep in testing. The last changelog entry advertises the removal of nova-xcp-plugins, but it is still there. On the other hand, if removing nova is accepted, it seems that novnc is the only reverse dependency. Please don't think this way. I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org I do not agree to just destroy my work this way. Also, I don't really understand what the problem is, since xcp-xapi has been fixed out to use the new type-conv thing. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5241c53a.7050...@debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit : However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the old version of XCP 1.3.2 in testing if that helps, plus add some blocking bugs so that the rest of Debian isn't affected by the (not finished) work on XCP 1.6 for Debian. More than two weeks later, xen-api is still in testing, and preventing the start of the OCaml transition. If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, nova-compute-xen. xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf package and could be removed from testing. On the other hand, both nova-* packages are built by nova which Julien wants to keep in testing. The last changelog entry advertises the removal of nova-xcp-plugins, but it is still there. Thomas, could you please upload a new nova without nova-xcp-plugins and nova-compute-xen? Well, that's the problem. It would be ok for me to remove nova-xcp-plugins, though it is not to remove nova-compute-xen, which needs python-xapi. At least I would like to keep the possibility to connect to CenOS-based XCP servers using the OpenStack in Debian. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5241c58f.5040...@debian.org
Bug#724306: Bug #724306: pu: package dpkg/1.16.11
Control: tags -1 + confirmed For some reason, this didn't make it to debian-release; that's usually related to attachment size, but they don't seem /that/ big... On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 17:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: dpkg (1.16.11) stable; urgency=low [ Raphaël Hertzog ] * Fix usage of non-existent _() function in multiple places of the Perl code. Thanks to Lincoln Myers linc...@netapp.com for the patch. Closes: #708607 [ Guillem Jover ] * Fix chmod() arguments order in Dpkg::Source::Quilt. Closes: #710265 Thanks to Pablo Oliveira pa...@sifflez.org. * Only ignore older packages if the existing version is informative. This allows any program using libdpkg to parse the available file to see again packages with versions lesser than 0-0 (like 0~0-0). Closes: #676664 * Fix use after free in dpkg_arch_load_list() on libdpkg. Reported by Pedro Ribeiro ped...@gmail.com. [ Updated programs translations ] * Vietnamese (Trần Ngọc Quân). Closes: #715334 [ Added man page translations ] * Italian (Beatrice Torracca). Closes: #711647 [ Updated man page translations ] * Japanese (TAKAHASHI Motonobu). Closes: #704240 This looks okay overall; thanks. I'm assuming that the changes have been tested on a stable system, particularly the Replaces. Is there a plan for fixing #717983 in unstable in the near future? As things currently stand, 1.16.11 would have to be pushed in to testing as part of the point release. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380048436.17826.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug #724306: pu: package dpkg/1.16.11
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #724306 [release.debian.org] pu: package dpkg/1.16.11 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 724306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724306 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b724306.138004844727799.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
Le 24/09/2013 19:00, Thomas Goirand a écrit : Please don't think this way. I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org If you go that way, I could say that you're blocking my work on 214 packages in Debian: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org I do not agree to just destroy my work this way. Removing a package from testing doesn't mean destroying it. On the other hand, the work done to prepare the OCaml transition is becoming more and more obsolete, effectively destroying it. Also, I don't really understand what the problem is, since xcp-xapi has been fixed out to use the new type-conv thing. xen-api is still failing to build from source in unstable. Excerpt from the build log: + gcc -g -O2 -DCOMPILE_NATIVE -I/usr/lib/ocaml -I/usr/include -I. -c -o xenguest_stubs.o xenguest_stubs.c In file included from xenguest_stubs.c:24:0: /usr/include/xs.h:1:2: warning: #warning xs.h is deprecated use xenstore.h instead [-Wcpp] #warning xs.h is deprecated use xenstore.h instead ^ xenguest_stubs.c: In function 'dispatch_suspend': xenguest_stubs.c:197:14: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] int domid = (int) arg; ^ xenguest_stubs.c: In function 'hvm_build_set_params': xenguest_stubs.c:360:8: error: 'struct hvm_info_table' has no member named 'acpi_enabled' va_hvm-acpi_enabled = f.acpi; ^ xenguest_stubs.c: At top level: xenguest_stubs.c:470:3: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] .postcopy = switch_qemu_logdirty, ^ xenguest_stubs.c:470:3: warning: (near initialization for 'save_callbacks.postcopy') [enabled by default] xenguest_stubs.c: In function 'stub_xc_domain_save': xenguest_stubs.c:490:18: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] callbacks.data = c_domid; ^ xenguest_stubs.c:497:21: error: too few arguments to function 'xc_domain_save' c_flags, callbacks, Bool_val(hvm)); ^ In file included from xenguest_stubs.c:23:0: /usr/include/xenguest.h:87:5: note: declared here int xc_domain_save(xc_interface *xch, int io_fd, uint32_t dom, uint32_t max_iters, ^ xenguest_stubs.c: In function 'stub_xc_domain_restore': xenguest_stubs.c:552:10: warning: passing argument 7 of 'xc_domain_restore' makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default] Bool_val(hvm), f.pae, 0 /*superpages*/); ^ In file included from xenguest_stubs.c:23:0: /usr/include/xenguest.h:122:5: note: expected 'unsigned int' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *' int xc_domain_restore(xc_interface *xch, int io_fd, uint32_t dom, ^ xenguest_stubs.c:552:10: warning: passing argument 8 of 'xc_domain_restore' makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] Bool_val(hvm), f.pae, 0 /*superpages*/); ^ In file included from xenguest_stubs.c:23:0: /usr/include/xenguest.h:122:5: note: expected 'long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'int' int xc_domain_restore(xc_interface *xch, int io_fd, uint32_t dom, ^ xenguest_stubs.c:552:10: error: too few arguments to function 'xc_domain_restore' Bool_val(hvm), f.pae, 0 /*superpages*/); ^ In file included from xenguest_stubs.c:23:0: /usr/include/xenguest.h:122:5: note: declared here int xc_domain_restore(xc_interface *xch, int io_fd, uint32_t dom, ^ As I've said numerous times already, xen-api needs an update. If you cannot update it, please arrange for its removal from testing. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5241e0d3.60...@debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:02:07 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit : However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the old version of XCP 1.3.2 in testing if that helps, plus add some blocking bugs so that the rest of Debian isn't affected by the (not finished) work on XCP 1.6 for Debian. More than two weeks later, xen-api is still in testing, and preventing the start of the OCaml transition. If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, nova-compute-xen. xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf package and could be removed from testing. On the other hand, both nova-* packages are built by nova which Julien wants to keep in testing. The last changelog entry advertises the removal of nova-xcp-plugins, but it is still there. Thomas, could you please upload a new nova without nova-xcp-plugins and nova-compute-xen? Well, that's the problem. It would be ok for me to remove nova-xcp-plugins, though it is not to remove nova-compute-xen, which needs python-xapi. At least I would like to keep the possibility to connect to CenOS-based XCP servers using the OpenStack in Debian. You can do that once xen-api is fixed. Until then, this needs to go. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 17:38:37 +0100, Graham Whaley wrote: I also have allocation for MIPS native build hardware. I need to discuss the present situation of the MIPS hardware within Debian, and how we can proceed to improve that situation. I've not identified who within Debian I need to discuss this with - if anybody could point me in the right direction or contact me directly then that would be very appreciated. The debian system administration team (d...@debian.org) handles our hardware resources. They'll probably be able to help you on that front. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721859: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 09:37 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2013-09-16): libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1 also made it to testing two days ago. There have been no new bug reports. (Hoping I'm not missing anything, it's been a long time since I last touched p-u requests…) please go ahead with an upload to p-u. Done. Flagged for acceptance in to p-u; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380058063.20484.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#721859: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #721859 [release.debian.org] pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 721859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b721859.138005807430489.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#724294: opu: package ia32-libs/20130923, ia32-libs-gtk/20130923
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 21:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 15:42 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: As usual I'd like to update ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk for the upcoming squeeze point release. Attached are the debdiffs this will result in currently. After these have been uploaded I'll monitor DSA's so I can provide a further update if necessary, but would like to have at least this uploaded so we have at least these fixes present. Please go ahead; thanks. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380058156.20484.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#724294: opu: package ia32-libs/20130923, ia32-libs-gtk/20130923
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #724294 [release.debian.org] opu: package ia32-libs/20130923, ia32-libs-gtk/20130923 Added tag(s) pending. -- 724294: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724294 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b724294.138005816330973.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: libquvi-scripts_0.4.18-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1voart-0002ao...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ia32-libs-gtk_20130924_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20130924_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1voasx-0002kq...@franck.debian.org
Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 05:26 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Tomasz Rybak tomasz.ry...@post.pl (2013-09-17): After asking on debian-mentors I was advised that I should also upload DFSG-free versions of packages to stable and oldstable: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/09/msg00104.html I attach debdiffs of proposed changes - please review those. The wheezy.diff one seems OK, feel free to get that one sponsored. It was, and I've just flagged it for acceptance. The changelog contains a reference to #722014 but does not close it for some reason; please ensure that the BTS metadata is fixed to indicate that the bug is fixed in this upload. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380062051.20484.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#723798: pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 21:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 08:45 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: Julien Cristau, 2013-09-19 23:48+0200: The debdiff should be in this bug, please. Sorry, I thought I did it. Here it is. Thanks. In general we'd prefer 0.15.1-4+deb7u1 as a version number, but please go ahead. It was uploaded, and I've flagged it for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380062017.20484.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #723587 [release.debian.org] pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL Added tag(s) pending. -- 723587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723587 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b723587.138006205920113.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#723798: pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #723798 [release.debian.org] pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4 Added tag(s) pending. -- 723798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723798 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b723798.138006202819788.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#723587: marked as done (pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:47:04 + with message-id e1vobno-0003lc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#723587: fixed in pyopencl 2012.1.dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #723587, regarding pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 723587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723587 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hello. I received bug report that my package python-pyopencl-doc contains non-free file in examples (#722014). Licence reads: Copyright NVIDIA. ALl rights reserved. NVIDIA Corporation and its licensors retain all intellectual property and proprietary rights in and to this software and related documentation. Any use, reproduction, disclosure, or distribution of this software and related documentation without an express license agreement from NVIDIA Corporation is strictly prohibited. I have checked and non-free file examples/matrix-multiply.py exists in all versions of PyOpenCL - in oldstable, stable, testing, and unstable. Upstream has been notified and removed this file from archive, and I'll soon upload fixed version to unstable. After asking on debian-mentors I was advised that I should also upload DFSG-free versions of packages to stable and oldstable: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/09/msg00104.html I attach debdiffs of proposed changes - please review those. I am DM, not DD, so I will need sponsor for those uploads. Best regards. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Tomasz Rybak GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860 Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860 http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak diff -Nru pyopencl-0.92/debian/changelog pyopencl-0.92.dfsg/debian/changelog --- pyopencl-0.92/debian/changelog 2010-11-11 23:10:57.0 +0100 +++ pyopencl-0.92.dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-09-17 17:12:20.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +pyopencl (0.92.dfsg-1) oldstable; urgency=low + + * Remove non-free file from examples (#722014). + + -- Tomasz Rybak tomasz.ry...@post.pl Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:03:46 +0200 + pyopencl (0.92-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream release diff -Nru pyopencl-0.92/debian/patches/python-versions.patch pyopencl-0.92.dfsg/debian/patches/python-versions.patch --- pyopencl-0.92/debian/patches/python-versions.patch 2010-11-11 13:30:27.0 +0100 +++ pyopencl-0.92.dfsg/debian/patches/python-versions.patch 2013-09-17 17:12:20.0 +0200 @@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ Python version and include it into name of linked library. Forwarded: not-needed Author: Tomasz Rybak bogom...@post.pl -Last-Update: 2010-11-11 -Index: pyopencl-0.92/setup.py +Last-Update: 2010-06-19 +Index: pyopencl-0.92~beta+git20100618/setup.py === pyopencl-0.92.orig/setup.py 2010-11-11 13:22:42.0 +0100 -+++ pyopencl-0.92/setup.py 2010-11-11 13:22:55.0 +0100 +--- pyopencl-0.92~beta+git20100618.orig/setup.py 2010-06-19 20:30:40.0 +0200 pyopencl-0.92~beta+git20100618/setup.py 2010-06-19 20:31:07.0 +0200 @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ def main(): @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ from aksetup_helper import (hack_distutils, get_config, setup, NumpyExtension, set_up_shipped_boost_if_requested) -@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ +@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ EXTRA_OBJECTS, EXTRA_DEFINES = set_up_shipped_boost_if_requested(conf) LIBRARY_DIRS = conf[BOOST_LIB_DIR] diff -Nru pyopencl-0.92/debian/patches/replace-setuptools.patch pyopencl-0.92.dfsg/debian/patches/replace-setuptools.patch --- pyopencl-0.92/debian/patches/replace-setuptools.patch 2010-11-11 13:30:27.0 +0100 +++ pyopencl-0.92.dfsg/debian/patches/replace-setuptools.patch 2013-09-17 17:12:20.0 +0200 @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ contains all necessary files and we avoid network traffic from build machine. Forwarded: not-needed Author: Tomasz Rybak bogom...@post.pl -Last-Update: 2010-11-11 -Index: pyopencl-0.92/MANIFEST.in +Last-Update: 2010-06-02 +Index: pyopencl-0.92~beta+git20100806/MANIFEST.in === pyopencl-0.92.orig/MANIFEST.in 2010-11-11 13:24:53.0 +0100 -+++
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: pyopencl_2012.1.dfsg-1_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gajim_0.15.1-4.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vobnq-0003mh...@franck.debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
Hi, I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian. Thanks Stephane for keeping your calm, baring with me, and taking the time to explain your point of view. I suppose you understood that I'm disappointed to have to drop XCP from testing. Though I now believe you are right, and there's no other option for the moment. You have been waiting for too long. Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition, Cheers, Thomas Goirand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524250ce.9070...@debian.org
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For sh4, I - test packages on this architecture - triage arch-specific bugs - fix arch-related bugs - maintain buildds For armel and armhf, I - test packages on this architecture - triage arch-specific bugs - fix arch-related bugs I am a DD. Best regards, Nobuhiro On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:33:51 +0200 (CEST) ni...@thykier.net (Niels Thykier) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an overview of which of the porters are (still) active for each port. Once the results from the role-call are in, we will request other information about the status of the ports. In the meantime, feel free to update and collect info about the ports in the Debian wiki[WIKI]. If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in the port to the Release Team debian-release@lists.debian.org before 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of your involvement in the port. Feel free to use the following template as your reply: Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For ARCH, I - test (most|all) packages on this architecture - fix toolchain issues - triage arch-specific bugs - fix arch-related bugs - maintain buildds - ... I am a DD|I am a DM|I am not a DD/DM YOUR NAME Niels, on behalf of the release team [LAST-BITS] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg6.html [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSIu2TAAoJEAVLu599gGRC86EP/j/7FEZ9pxpTEHrBI41GTu6r nENS5kAZAuxFQHfYLtKexBcgneGd6cgdmr3cIoh1ZL9lJgXq74X8FL5IbWNqUw9S o9UQWpZJiwIIlH4fqSgFVLIphI0DQr7dXI7xcDIm4kl6Fdruo1tGxX8xqL23jzdP nQb3jrXv3bj5943MfWeCbODILv2N6qev9VtWeQ6Wmh8PvxRUl7VqgdQaeHtlMsUp TQT5fz0cw8gc2amlwlOZxaGDV2C8mHboJIKMEsu79BK4SlFSED9rXn4juFPUnAgG uADsMdBBqEIgSMN42cPHQju+KLfJe/+xScmlzzDS/d7aWWs02TibcQ1ZnPi+bcgp bd/Wa0lms+Fc2OpcuFle9Lwo+2B+ka1Dd3itm+D0SbmrxoGi6CuMMwydLcQbSJ73 hHw9HJEIQr2x/ZItNPJrSvvj50rwYXcmFbxtVAwv2pFXfQ37iukYgAaaMvnwpNNJ 6dM1coCF9skNkXLO8rkZ+5aupGgjpS9BdKKAEQrPy/aoaW9KNCZrLQeA4C3QySBU OcCNBv7taSjVAVNszKtRIQpu2gzFGAV0u9Gj41qW1JzDHYrmAvMyGxrndOxTmaFr p05QWgcMsPhNvdHjd6sWLyzJ5NYUKksCPMRgCc0BEd6moIyrt7UFsp2+guJZPBJ0 pffEJGK2iGtrWmJfElof =TUeZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130901073351.a92862...@thykier.net -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org pgpEHRv2nL1KB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#724508: marked as done (nmu: libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Sep 2013 03:19:02 + with message-id e1vofd0-0005xf...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#724508: fixed in libfile-extattr-perl 1.09-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #724508, regarding nmu: libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 724508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724508 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Seems like 1.09-3 is again built against Perl 5.14. Please nmu libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3 . amd64 . -m Rebuild against Perl 5.18. (Alexander, please update your build enviroment.) Cheers, gregor - -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSQajMAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGI0AP/R4J3NHyVLtsYCNQIJxsS9iB EjAxcrU4BzPfVLJEmlzQ8kzsFP2WQIBI88siWxrPMHitDFLDXR/HvB8VQc9x+AhE 2Z22MC5ZbKnm5Ead4JBIeHfc+8mw7q9FytZgkW1doXWWFpW+I0W5sq+hWShnhhb/ FxvJeV3sNgHBRVushgdY8hiU5fMhOcflvZ4dyh95jLa7wGON0OXpW5ZkVKtbdcCz IRGlIoVcUecVW9MGg8V4lBoeddrOT5Ohh4m4RX4oYJ2F3IUhB9z38+idmRX3u2Xb bRsiPqiFfmcuwVg26MCtdqt7UAD9eEylvQHEcynQAa4PNq2qyKzzFfSc8K9+5CAX csp1lQe793UJ3V/C/AEWIbD8aMWt+NnRNLG6UZYSGUt94mgUkVDxdv0Bu6AOvgkH eMTPX/a3LXtrk262okmMerYQRO8TY8m9LW1S5wFKlNLlkvC3JV0YJYPo55cbVifU c32HD4wep0Af2pRlq8pHUrO02JHOe2EhICxiHcePhbCrKuPWBu/nJiryFEOA8+2i qoHXBh9yRu1gP8rri0irJYP355nsAE1CMx6MJriuonDvSchLBg8+Oj1R+uTRPP31 E87J44n3aQjyoi/zhomi6qmKe4QD626O0cofvi1ps1kkgQGozu3etitVRkYZUAwx 9c5U1IMabKe2nbMbbVFf =0VTp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libfile-extattr-perl Source-Version: 1.09-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libfile-extattr-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 724...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Zangerl a...@debian.org (supplier of updated libfile-extattr-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:07:57 +1000 Source: libfile-extattr-perl Binary: libfile-extattr-perl Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.09-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alexander Zangerl a...@debian.org Changed-By: Alexander Zangerl a...@debian.org Description: libfile-extattr-perl - Perl interface to file system extended attributes Closes: 724508 Changes: libfile-extattr-perl (1.09-4) unstable; urgency=low . * inadvertently built the previous version against stable instead of sid (closes: #724508) Checksums-Sha1: 4e4ead5e3181c78ef70d7c5795c671073b1264b6 1223 libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4.dsc 0857c3678ea4244a9979e36ea9105d44403164b6 2207 libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4.debian.tar.gz 723176a8a949747cffe7ad8df70c9bf8905e10ec 25444 libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 7a7ed8346696dbb576f98faec7f80c6c25dc0c02fb9456eabe19775f58831e27 1223 libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4.dsc f388e8ec9034e7e0fc1787b79926a37e33b6ded5d59bd6a680d9976b2dc4f4b0 2207 libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4.debian.tar.gz 6b8df0eac3916c9ebef7cf017547fdb6227eed16c6d2f93d3e280758936a5822 25444 libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4_amd64.deb Files: 5859aef206e9c44033820f734f121639 1223 perl optional libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4.dsc b4210ae38e7e905d84061d6bac77955f 2207 perl optional libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4.debian.tar.gz 1016023c4ebca9b7f206c8401c731a02 25444 perl optional libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-4_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlJCP34ACgkQ+bKELRvb2DzbzgD9FWSJi8pLMunLAe5BDQpKsnoN hGjUcOj5uVVJd4DTvB0A/iw3evE8pUbg8KAOu730KRvFNhaYksAMG1bgWDsKUu2L =sqTc -END PGP
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: ia32-libs-gtk_20130924_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vog4j-0003ag...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20130924_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vogj8-0005jr...@franck.debian.org
Processed: reopening 723587, tagging 723587
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Don't close p-u bugs in your upload...
reopen 723587
Bug #723587 {Done: Tomasz Rybak tomasz.ry...@post.pl} [release.debian.org]
pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions pyopencl/2012.1.dfsg-1.
tags 723587 + pending
Bug #723587 [release.debian.org] pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
723587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.138008388110858.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
