Re: Bug#886294: transition: nodejs
On 01/24/2018 06:51 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:24:06PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Our baseline is z10, and z196 is newer. So if upstream now requires z196, we >> have three options: >> >> - Revert / fix that so upstream works with z10 again >> - Remove nodejs from s390x >> - Bump our baseline >> >> See go and rustc for similar problems. > > All the other buildds are already z13 (either 2964-NE1 or 2964-N63). Yup. But the more crucial part is what to do about the user-sided baseline. And I think we're mostly at the point where there isn't an advantage to keeping the baseline low except a lot of churn on our side in which no-one else is interested in. People on older platforms could still use stable for a while. Does anyone happen to know what the story with Hercules is[1]? I don't worry about qemu. Kind regards and thanks Philipp Kern [1] Yes, I feel like I should know. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#886294: transition: nodejs
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:24:06PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Our baseline is z10, and z196 is newer. So if upstream now requires z196, we > have three options: > > - Revert / fix that so upstream works with z10 again > - Remove nodejs from s390x > - Bump our baseline > > See go and rustc for similar problems. All the other buildds are already z13 (either 2964-NE1 or 2964-N63). Bastian -- The idea of male and female are universal constants. -- Kirk, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8
Re: Bug#886294: transition: nodejs
On 23/01/18 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote: > cc-ing s390x team to ask (re)building nodejs-8.9.3~dfsg-11 on zemlinsky. > > but on s390x you're getting > illegal instructions on zemlinsky, which is a Z10 mainframe. Looks > like newer > node possibly bumped the baseline, or just accidentally introduced > instructions > not supported by our baseline. > > > Starting investigations about that. Hopefully it's a change that could > have been > backward-compatible. > > > nodejs/v8 somewhat officially support s390x down to z196. > I removed the added march=z196 flag and uploaded it into nodejs-8.9.3~dfsg-11. > It would be wonderful to build it on zemlinsky to see what happens. Still fails: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=node-srs&suite=sid Our baseline is z10, and z196 is newer. So if upstream now requires z196, we have three options: - Revert / fix that so upstream works with z10 again - Remove nodejs from s390x - Bump our baseline See go and rustc for similar problems. Cheers, Emilio
