Re: Presentació

2013-03-03 Thread David Peña
Hola!

Doncs dispara i a ver-he si et puc ajudar.

Si vols pots fer la consulta al correu: davidpeny...@gmail.com, igualment a
la web http://www.ochobitshacenunbyte.com tincs articles que tracten el
tema.

Salut!


2013/3/2 Serotonina EH serotonin...@riseup.net

 Una pregunta, utilitzas Proxmox? Estic bastant interesat en que fem alguns
 tallers sobre proxmox

 David Peña david.pe...@digital-text.com ha escrit:

 Hola!

 Hem presento, sóc en David i visc al Vallès Occidental, tot i que per
 feina estic bastant per Barcelona. Actualment treballo en una empresa
 editorial al departament de sistemes. De fet des-de que estic he aconseguit
 treure una mica la windows dependència i hem instal·lat varis servidors amb
 Linux, sobre tot Debian, tant com servidor FTP físic, com servidors
 virtuals per serveis de correu amb Postfix, Wikis, Inventaris amb OCS i
 control de màquines critiques amb Nagios.

 M'asembla molt bona idea el tema de quedar en un local. Imagino que ja
 anirem concretant.

 Salut!


 2013/3/2 serotoninaeh serotonin...@riseup.net

 Ens veiem alla llavors...

 El 02/03/13 14:13, a...@probeta.net escribió:

  A 2013-03-02 14:01, serotoninaeh escrigué:

 Es molt interessant la teva proposta!! Jo encantat! El local que
 comentaves aquí pertany? A part a Gracia conec variïs llocs que no
 posarien cap mena de pega i estarien encantats, entre ells son La
 Barraqueta, El Casal de Joves de Gracia, LaTorna , Llibreria Aldarull
 entre altres , apart com dèiem es pot anar fent a diferents llocs crec
 que es el interessant

 Per exemple a Sabadell al Casal Independentista Cancapablanca fa
 temps que volíem fer uns tallers, així que per llocs no falten, només
 reactivar un col·lectiu que promoguem Gnu-Linux i com no espai tipus
 Hackerspace on poder junta a diferent gent.

 Desde fa temps penso que la gent que estem promoguem el softlliure
 estem estancats en ghettos (amb tot el respecte) i que fa falta
 conscienciació i ajudar a que la comunitat creixi molt mes, tinc
 variïs projectes que en tot cas parlarem mes endavant. Però primer el
 primer.

 Busquem una data per xerrar?




 Jo demà diumenge havia de corregir molts exàmens però pensava fer-ho al
 solet, a Can Masdeu   (M Canyelles)

 http://www.canmasdeu.net/

 I per casualitat he vist que una de les activitats de Can Masdeu demà a
 la tarda és una xerrada sobre ciberactivisme, un tema del que fa molts anys
 que estic desconnectat:

 16 – 18h: Xerra-taller: Tàctiques d'acció 2.0 en el *ciber-espai i en
 l'espai físic

 Del que hem après a la Xarxa i de com es pot extrapolar a tots els
 espais de lluita...

 Internet no és només una eina, és una època històrica. El
 desenvolupament tecnològic modifica les formes d'organització, de pensar i
 de veure el món. Internet és una eina i un camp de batalla. Internet no és
 “per fer-me publicitat”, és per compartir i relacionar inputs, és
 l'oportunitat d'actuar diferent i canviar les regles del joc.

 Compte! Nota per millorar la comprensió: El que diem a Internet és
 rellevant només si incideix fora de la xarxa.
 Nota per millorar la comprensió encara més: quan diem “incidir fora” no
 ens referim a muntar manis, sinó a canviar el món… però això esperem que
 quedi clar durant la xerrada-taller.



 Jo estaré per allà. Suposo que és massa precipitat com per que sigui
 alhora una trobada de la gent que estem interessats en això que et
 comentes, però si et passes ens podem trobar i xerrar una mica.




 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to 
 debian-user-catalan-REQUEST@**lists.debian.orgdebian-user-catalan-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/**5131fd67.7070...@riseup.nethttp://lists.debian.org/5131fd67.7070...@riseup.net




 --
 Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail.




-- 


David Peña
Administrador Sistemes Informàtics
*Telf. 93 376 36 36*
www.digital-text.com
david.pe...@digital-text.com


Aquest correu electrònic i els seus fitxers adjunts contenen informació de
caràcter confidencial exclusivament dirigida als seus destinataris. En cas
d'haver rebut aquest correu per error, li demanem que ens el reenviï
immediatament a aquesta adreça electrònica o ens ho notifiqui al telèfon
(+34) 902 876 396. En queda prohibida la divulgació, còpia o distribució a
tercers sense l'autorització prèvia i per escrit del titular. D’acord amb
el que s'estableix a la Llei orgànica 15/1999, de 13 de desembre, de
protecció de dades de caràcter personal, AULA DIGITAL-TEXT SL garanteix
l’adopció de les mesures necessàries per a la protecció de les seves dades
personals i la seva adreça de correu electrònic.


Este correo electrónico y sus ficheros adjuntos contienen información de
carácter confidencial exclusivamente dirigida a sus destinatarios. En caso
de haber recibido este correo por error, le rogamos que lo reenvíe
inmediatamente a esta misma dirección o nos lo notifique al teléfono (+34)
902 876 396. Queda prohibida su 

Re: resultat different d'un script appele par cron ou en console

2013-03-03 Thread Francois Mescam

On 01/03/2013 23:15, C Diaz wrote:

Bonsoir,

Mon problème du jour, un script, appelé par cron, ne donne pas le même
résultat que si je l'exécute dans une console.



Ce ne serait pas cron qui lance ton script avec bash/dash et en console 
que ce soit le contraire.


--
F.Mescam

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgv13p$f4q$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: resultat different d'un script appele par cron ou en console

2013-03-03 Thread C Diaz

Le 03/03/2013 09:20, Francois Mescam a écrit :

On 01/03/2013 23:15, C Diaz wrote:

Bonsoir,

Mon problème du jour, un script, appelé par cron, ne donne pas le même
résultat que si je l'exécute dans une console.



Ce ne serait pas cron qui lance ton script avec bash/dash et en 
console que ce soit le contraire.



Bonjour,

Tiens, dash, c'est la première fois que j'en entends parler. Pourtant 
mon script appelé par cron commence bien par

#! /bin/bash
Si cron utilise dash par défaut, je ne vais pas trop y toucher, il y 
peut-être une bonne raison à ce choix.

Christophe

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51330e80.9050...@laposte.net



Re: resultat different d'un script appele par cron ou en console

2013-03-03 Thread C Diaz

Le 03/03/2013 02:06, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :

.../...
Autre chose... Est-ce que les deux commandes suivantes donnent la même
sortie?

   /sbin/tune2fs -l  fichier_enregistrant_la_sortie
   /sbin/tune2fs -l | cat  fichier_enregistrant_la_sortie

(Certains utilitaires perdent des données avec un pipe sous certaines
conditions.)

   
Oui les deux commandes dans un script appelé par cron donnent la même 
chose, ce n'est donc pas pipe qui pose problème.

Christophe

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51330f1f.9020...@laposte.net



Re: mplayer détection de plus de flux

2013-03-03 Thread moi-meme
Le Sun, 03 Mar 2013 02:40:02 +0100, Raphaël POITEVIN a écrit :

 Je suis un mécréant : il me regarde mais ne m'aide pas (il rigole de me
 malheurs). Je mettrai un cierge demain matin quand l'église sera
 ouverte.
 
 Ça peut peut-être marché !

non

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51330d18$0$2211$426a7...@news.free.fr



Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread Bruno

Bonjour à tous,

Je test une raspberry pi sous raspbian wheezy.
Cela fonctionne étonnamment et globalement bien.
Je ne parviens cependant à accéder au réseau via le wifi, dés lors que 
je débranche la rj45.
Par contre si le cable éthernet et la clef USB/WiFi sont présents pas de 
soucis.
Existe t'il sur ce news des utilisatuers de raspi ? et si oui, cela vous 
évoquent ils quelque chose ?


Dans l'attente de vous lire, A+

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51332602$0$21947$426a7...@news.free.fr



Re: Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread Sébastien NOBILI
Le dimanche 03 mars 2013 à 11:27, Bruno a écrit :
 Bonjour à tous,

Bonjour,

[...]

 Existe t'il sur ce news des utilisatuers de raspi ? et si oui, cela
 vous évoquent ils quelque chose ?

Il y en a, oui, mais beaucoup moins que d'utilisateurs de Debian. Ce problème
étant certainement très spécifique à Raspbian, tu auras plus de chances de
trouver des réponses à tes questions sur les forums Raspbian. D'ailleurs, après
une seconde et demi de recherche :
http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=28t=23963p=301220

Seb

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130303110215.ga15...@serveur.nob900.homeip.net



Re: HS iptables et set mark pour séparer le trafic par interface

2013-03-03 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Salut,

daniel huhardeaux a écrit :
 
 a) iptables ne tient pas compte de -j CONNMARK --set-mark [1|2] mais -j 
 MARK --set-mark [1|2] fonctionne

Les deux ne font évidemment pas la même chose. L'option --set-mark de
CONNMARK modifie la marque de connexion qui est sans effet sur le
routage, alors que celle de MARK modifie la marque de paquet, qui peut
influer sur le routage. Pour copier la marque de connexion dans la
marque de paquet, il faut utiliser CONNMARK --restore-mark. Tout ceci
est expliqué dans la page de manuel d'iptables.

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513335c0.1080...@plouf.fr.eu.org



Re: Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread s l
 Le dimanche 03 mars 2013 à 11:27, Bruno a écrit :
 [...] Existe t'il sur ce news des utilisateurs de raspi ?
 et si oui, cela vous évoquent ils quelque chose ?


Bonjour
Tu peux contacter les hackerspaces
http://www.parinux.org/content/hacklabs
Librement, Stef

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFPKLMJTpcogvEpXQxTbDn+i3bvvz8=pyfhevnwhnbtxpso...@mail.gmail.com



Re: resultat different d'un script appele par cron ou en console

2013-03-03 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Bonjour,

On 2013-03-03 09:49:04 +0100, C Diaz wrote:
 Le 03/03/2013 09:20, Francois Mescam a écrit :
 Ce ne serait pas cron qui lance ton script avec bash/dash et en console
 que ce soit le contraire.
 
 Tiens, dash, c'est la première fois que j'en entends parler. Pourtant mon
 script appelé par cron commence bien par
 #! /bin/bash
 Si cron utilise dash par défaut, je ne vais pas trop y toucher, il y
 peut-être une bonne raison à ce choix.

Par défaut, cron utilise /bin/sh, qui correspond à dash sur les
Debian récentes. Mais c'est pour lancer la commande, qui peut être
plus compliquée qu'un nom de script (cf exemples dans la page man
crontab(5)). Le script lui-même va être exécuté par bash, sauf si
la commande dans le crontab est . nom_du_script, le . étant
une commande shell pour exécuter un script dans le shell courant.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303125259.ga7...@xvii.vinc17.org



Re: resultat different d'un script appele par cron ou en console

2013-03-03 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-03-02 10:51:47 +0100, C Diaz wrote:
 Chez moi ça ne marche pas aussi bien, la commande grep semble plus
 récalcitrante.
 Dans le script appelé par cron,
 
 /sbin/tune2fs -l  fichier_enregistrant_la_sortie
 
 fonctionne
 
 mais
 /sbin/tune2fs -l  | /bin/grep ma chaine de tri 
 fichier_enregistrant_la_sortie
 
 ne fonctionne pas.

Les locales peuvent faire une différence, mais il y a également
d'autres choses: plus généralement, l'environnement, car grep
est sensible à certaines variables d'environnement, listées dans
sa page man (e.g. GREP_OPTIONS). Le fait aussi que les commandes
soient attachées à un terminal ou non...

Autre chose que tu peux tester:

/sbin/tune2fs -l  fichier_tmp
/bin/grep ma chaine de tri fichier_tmp  fichier_enregistrant_la_sortie

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303130155.gb7...@xvii.vinc17.org



server backports en ipv6 injoignable

2013-03-03 Thread Wallace
Bonjour,

Depuis plusieurs réseaux opérateurs différents, je n'arrive pas à
accéder à backports.debian.org en ipv6 2001:858:2:2:214:22ff:fe0d:7717
Cela fait plusieurs jours, je me décide donc à prévenir sauf que pour ce
genre de souci, je ne sais trop où lancer l'information.
Où faut il déclarer les incidents sur les serveurs repository?

Merci



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: server backports en ipv6 injoignable

2013-03-03 Thread David Prévot
Salut,

Le 03/03/2013 10:31, Wallace a écrit :

 Où faut il déclarer les incidents sur les serveurs repository?

reportbug mirrors

Amicalement

David




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Logiciel QCM + réponses écrites

2013-03-03 Thread Grégoire COUTANT

Bonjour,

Le 01/03/2013 23:48, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :

Connaissez vous un logiciel OpenSource d'enquêtes,
type QCM et avec aussi la possibilité de réponses écrites
poir le sondé.


http://www.google.com/insights/consumersurveys/home

Greg

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513366f2.7000...@gmail.com



Re: server backports en ipv6 injoignable

2013-03-03 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Salut,

Wallace a écrit :
 
 Depuis plusieurs réseaux opérateurs différents, je n'arrive pas à
 accéder à backports.debian.org en ipv6 2001:858:2:2:214:22ff:fe0d:7717

Pour info, depuis Nerim ça a l'air de marcher sur les deux adresses.

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51336839.7080...@plouf.fr.eu.org



Re: Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread moi-meme
Le Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:10:01 +0100, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit :

 Il y en a, oui, mais beaucoup moins que d'utilisateurs de Debian. Ce
 problème étant certainement très spécifique à Raspbian, tu auras plus de
 chances de trouver des réponses à tes questions sur les forums Raspbian.

la Raspbian est une quasiment une Debian Wheezy. Installation un peu 
particulière sur une SD, c'est presque tout.

C'est quif-quif sauf pour le GPIO en plus.

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133a3be$0$3744$426a7...@news.free.fr



Re: Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread moi-meme
Le Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:10:01 +0100, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit :

 Existe t'il sur ce news des utilisatuers de raspi ? et si oui, cela
 vous évoquent ils quelque chose ?
 
 Il y en a, oui, mais beaucoup moins que d'utilisateurs de Debian. Ce
 problème étant certainement très spécifique à Raspbian, tu auras plus de
 chances de trouver des réponses à tes questions sur les forums Raspbian.
 D'ailleurs, après une seconde et demi de recherche :
 http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?
f=28t=23963p=301220

je te confirme pour le site raspberry.

Pour la commutation automatique RJ45/WiFi je m'y suis cassé les dents.

Obligé de passer par un reboot. Pour moi cela ne me gène pas.

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133a2dc$0$3744$426a7...@news.free.fr



Re: Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread Bzzz
On 03 Mar 2013 19:25:50 GMT
moi-meme chie...@free.fr wrote:

 la Raspbian est une quasiment une Debian Wheezy. Installation un peu 
 particulière sur une SD, c'est presque tout.
 
 C'est quif-quif sauf pour le GPIO en plus.
 
Ça a l'air pômal du tout, il y a même une image pour
FreeSwitch!

-- 
Bricou Ta mère est tellement grosse que même ZFS ne pourrait pas la stocker !

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303205250.77c903ae@anubis.defcon1



Re: Raspberry et réseaux

2013-03-03 Thread Bruno

Le 03/03/2013 12:10, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit :

Le dimanche 03 mars 2013 à 11:27, Bruno a écrit :

Bonjour à tous,


Bonjour,

[...]


Existe t'il sur ce news des utilisatuers de raspi ? et si oui, cela
vous évoquent ils quelque chose ?


Il y en a, oui, mais beaucoup moins que d'utilisateurs de Debian. Ce problème
étant certainement très spécifique à Raspbian, tu auras plus de chances de
trouver des réponses à tes questions sur les forums Raspbian. D'ailleurs, après
une seconde et demi de recherche :
 http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=28t=23963p=301220

Seb

Deux secondes de plus, aurai permis de voir que si ils évoquent le même 
problème, la solution n'à pas été trouvé ...

Merci quand même pour ce lien
(j'ai aussi plusieurs fois installé ifplugd, et j'ai la toute dernière 
version raspbian).


A+

--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133b1dd$0$3715$426a3...@news.free.fr



HS²[Re: HS - Client openvpn sur iOS/android]

2013-03-03 Thread philippe monroux
De (from) (von) no-s...@tootai.net :

 Pour iPhone je ne saurai répondre. pour Android il y a toujours eu
 (depuis au moins 3 ans 1/2) des clients OpenVPN, il fallait
 toutefois chrooter le smartphone. Je l'avais fait et m'étais amuser
 avec OpenVPN, toutefois la baisse drastique de la batterie m'a
 rapidement fait abandonner l'application.

je me permets de rebondir sur un sujet connexe

Je voudrais rooter mon samsung ace plus (sous android donc)
mais toute les méthodes que je lis (et y en a un tas) sont sous W$.

Y en a-t-il une sous debian ?

Merci par avance

-- 
Philippe

-- 
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists

Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130304020734.GA7990@locahost@localdomain



Re: Rilis Debian Handbook Bahasa Indonesia: Bab 1

2013-03-03 Thread gibran
terimakasih pak, semoga bermanfaat 


On Mar 1, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Zaki Akhmad wrote:

 Salam,
 
 Hari ini saya putuskan untuk rilis versi testing, Debian Handbook
 bahasa Indonesia, bab 1. Bukunya bisa diunduh di sini[1]
 Silakan diunduh, dibaca, dan dicerminkan ;-)
 
 Kata pengantar dari saya bisa dibaca di sini[2].
 
 [1]http://za.cindai.web.id/debian/debian-handbook/id/20130301/
 [2]http://blogs.itb.ac.id/zakiakhmad/2013/03/01/rilis-debian-handbook-bahasa-indonesia-bab-1/
 
 Semoga bermanfaat,
 
 -- 
 Zaki Akhmad
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-indonesian-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/cae7ck-qihx6wnt349nrn31fucgvebrpvj+ajfr3rpndikom...@mail.gmail.com
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-indonesian-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/567d132c-bac6-4b4d-8a73-ed21242db...@gmail.com



Re: [OT] descarga nlite W7

2013-03-03 Thread alexlikerock-Gmail

1.-antes que nada  kiero agradecer a las criticas constructivas
me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)

2do. en segunda no keria responder este troleo  que se  levanto tras mi 
critica-reclamo-anglicismo (etc,etc, o como lo kieran definir) por que 
no kiero colaborar a meterle mas spam a la lista,de ser pocible eliminen 
este tema, pero esta respuesta creo q puede ser constructiva.
3.-este tema se me ace absurdo que no tiene sentido desperdiciar 
nuestras mentes, tiempo y valor. creo q simplemete tenemos q dejar a un 
lado  no vale la pena este debate. este es una lista de soporte/ense#ar 
en debian y PUNTO.




ruben , definitivamente estas   MUY  equibocado de lugar, no vuelvas a
acer este tipo de peticion de ayuda  o te reportaremos como spam ,

(...)

Creo que te has pasado un poco. Un poco bastante. Y ese tono amenazador
que empleas tampoco ayuda :-/


Bien lo dices, creo, yo no lo creo así.




genial apoyo !  (Y)


No sé a quién te refieres cuando dices reportaremos (en plural), yo no
voy a reportar nada a nadie y en todo caso sería informar que
reportar es un anglicismo horrible por muy aceptado por la RAE que esté
(en mi opinión, erróneamente).

Personalmente yo si lo reportaría.
encontre apoyo asi que mas de uno piensa como yo que se debe reportar , 
por eso me adelante y dije en plural

¿De donde has sacado que es un anglicismo?, puede ser usado informar
pero ambos estarían correctos.
  Ya, ok sabes mucho, ayudas mucho, demasiado a veces pero esa es mi
opinión, pero ya como que te pasas, das cátedra en todo y a todos, te
has transformado en una especie de dueña de la lista
en esto de ...la due#a de la lista  si lo creo pues ami tambien me 
pasa , q  saber tanto de algo despues uno como persona se vuelve 
AUTORITARIO,


 creo q tienes q pensar eso camaleon, es verdad sabes mucho y resuelves 
muchos problemas , pero en este caso nesecitavas resaltar criticas 
buenas tambien  como que acerte  como que el Licenciado 
ruben.cervantes estaba metiendo off-topin  y no solo las malas 
pareciendo una mujer frustrada [6] (con el devido respeto )



  y te informo que
no lo eres, si hay algunos que te siguen haya ellos, pero a otros que
no nos gusta tu actitud de querer siempre saberlo todo y tener la
última palabra en todo.



PD.  Ohhh   hay vida más allá del teclado.



en esto estoy muy de acuerdo. siempre empezamos a responder así cuando 
nos sentimos incómodos, aburridos (tanto responder o trabajo,) , 
fastidiados, sin ganas de ayudar y simplemente por responder la carta 
por costumbre.

ese es momento de soltar el teclado un rato







No me quería meter en este asunto, pero viendo ese esperpento[1] de
mensaje, y probablemente, también es un esperpento de persona,

si estoy de acuerdo con tigo q soy un esperpento

  tengo
que decir que es una ofensa al idioma leer eso. No sólo con el tono
ofensivo, sino que comete tantas faltas de ortografía.
tengo  mucha falta de ortografia pues nunca tube buenos maestros de 
espa#ol (exceptuando uno) y sumandole a eso que use mucho el messenger, 
este es un resultado

  ¿Seguro lo
redactó pensando en su aborrecimiento al Windows?


ahun  si tengo aborrecimiento a Güindow$ en la mayoria de  las veces
esta ves NO FUE ASI ,
 en la carta orinal resalte mi motivo de molestia



justo ahora tengo que leer 107 cartas de esta lista de correo, y si todos
pensaran como tu se conver tirian en 307 o mas!



que se apega las normas de la lista [7] a el punto
#2,
#4 (---no estoy seguro de este),
#7,
y el mas importante #9 ,
 #10 (este lo aplica altamente en la seccion y otras normas de 
sentido comun 

¿Pues que rayos tiene que pedir nlite para W7 en una lsita de debian?)
pero en fin . no sigamos con este tema



Hagan un traceroute,
emailtracer, o como lo llamen, y verán de dónde mando este mensaje.

lo mande de mi debian;
$ uname -a
Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2 i686 GNU/Linux
$ icedove -v
 Icedove 17.0




¡Ah! Y hagan este ejercicio (lleva sólo 5 minutos): tomen un
diccionario, o un tomo de la enciclopedia, cierren los ojos, y denle 5
vueltas, abran una página al azar y coloquen el dedo donde sea. Y lean
la palabra y su significado 5 veces. Ayuda bastante.

me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)


[1]http://www.wordreference.com/definicion/esperpento


para finalizar apeguemonos a las normas [7] es un simple recordatorio 
( ahorita )

y alguien borre estos temas innecesarios por favor.
PD: NO respondan este mensage , ni para defenderse ni para apoyar, gracias


[6] http://lema.rae.es/drae/srv/search?id=3cMzQhQBCDXX2wthGzLn
[7] http://wiki.debian.org/es/NormasLista#resumen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133107a.7040...@gmail.com



Re: [OT] descarga nlite W7

2013-03-03 Thread francisco cid
ni se imaginan cuanto ancho de banda me gastó, recibir este correo,ai
alguien se equivoca, haganselo saber pero no lo destruyan con comentarios
poco contructivos.


El 3 de marzo de 2013 05:57, alexlikerock-Gmail
alexliker...@gmail.comescribió:

 1.-antes que nada  kiero agradecer a las criticas constructivas
 me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)

 2do. en segunda no keria responder este troleo  que se  levanto tras mi
 critica-reclamo-anglicismo (etc,etc, o como lo kieran definir) por que no
 kiero colaborar a meterle mas spam a la lista,de ser pocible eliminen este
 tema, pero esta respuesta creo q puede ser constructiva.
 3.-este tema se me ace absurdo que no tiene sentido desperdiciar nuestras
 mentes, tiempo y valor. creo q simplemete tenemos q dejar a un lado  no
 vale la pena este debate. este es una lista de soporte/ense#ar en debian y
 PUNTO.


 ruben , definitivamente estas   MUY  equibocado de lugar, no vuelvas a
 acer este tipo de peticion de ayuda  o te reportaremos como spam ,

 (...)

 Creo que te has pasado un poco. Un poco bastante. Y ese tono amenazador
 que empleas tampoco ayuda :-/

  Bien lo dices, creo, yo no lo creo así.



 genial apoyo !  (Y)

  No sé a quién te refieres cuando dices reportaremos (en plural), yo no
 voy a reportar nada a nadie y en todo caso sería informar que
 reportar es un anglicismo horrible por muy aceptado por la RAE que esté
 (en mi opinión, erróneamente).

 Personalmente yo si lo reportaría.

 encontre apoyo asi que mas de uno piensa como yo que se debe reportar ,
 por eso me adelante y dije en plural

  ¿De donde has sacado que es un anglicismo?, puede ser usado informar
 pero ambos estarían correctos.
   Ya, ok sabes mucho, ayudas mucho, demasiado a veces pero esa es mi
 opinión, pero ya como que te pasas, das cátedra en todo y a todos, te
 has transformado en una especie de dueña de la lista

 en esto de ...la due#a de la lista  si lo creo pues ami tambien me pasa
 , q  saber tanto de algo despues uno como persona se vuelve AUTORITARIO,

  creo q tienes q pensar eso camaleon, es verdad sabes mucho y resuelves
 muchos problemas , pero en este caso nesecitavas resaltar criticas buenas
 tambien  como que acerte  como que el Licenciado ruben.cervantes estaba
 metiendo off-topin  y no solo las malas pareciendo una mujer frustrada [6]
 (con el devido respeto )

y te informo que
 no lo eres, si hay algunos que te siguen haya ellos, pero a otros que
 no nos gusta tu actitud de querer siempre saberlo todo y tener la
 última palabra en todo.



 PD.  Ohhh   hay vida más allá del teclado.


 en esto estoy muy de acuerdo. siempre empezamos a responder así cuando nos
 sentimos incómodos, aburridos (tanto responder o trabajo,) , fastidiados,
 sin ganas de ayudar y simplemente por responder la carta por costumbre.
 ese es momento de soltar el teclado un rato




 


  No me quería meter en este asunto, pero viendo ese esperpento[1] de
 mensaje, y probablemente, también es un esperpento de persona,

 si estoy de acuerdo con tigo q soy un esperpento

tengo
 que decir que es una ofensa al idioma leer eso. No sólo con el tono
 ofensivo, sino que comete tantas faltas de ortografía.

 tengo  mucha falta de ortografia pues nunca tube buenos maestros de
 espa#ol (exceptuando uno) y sumandole a eso que use mucho el messenger,
 este es un resultado

¿Seguro lo
 redactó pensando en su aborrecimiento al Windows?


 ahun  si tengo aborrecimiento a Güindow$ en la mayoria de  las veces
 esta ves NO FUE ASI ,
  en la carta orinal resalte mi motivo de molestia


 

 justo ahora tengo que leer 107 cartas de esta lista de correo, y si todos
 pensaran como tu se conver tirian en 307 o mas!

 

 que se apega las normas de la lista [7] a el punto
 #2,
 #4 (---no estoy seguro de este),
 #7,
 y el mas importante #9 ,
  #10 (este lo aplica altamente en la seccion y otras normas de
 sentido comun 
 ¿Pues que rayos tiene que pedir nlite para W7 en una lsita de debian?)
 pero en fin . no sigamos con este tema



  Hagan un traceroute,
 emailtracer, o como lo llamen, y verán de dónde mando este mensaje.

 lo mande de mi debian;
 $ uname -a
 Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2 i686 GNU/Linux
 $ icedove -v
  Icedove 17.0




 ¡Ah! Y hagan este ejercicio (lleva sólo 5 minutos): tomen un
 diccionario, o un tomo de la enciclopedia, cierren los ojos, y denle 5
 vueltas, abran una página al azar y coloquen el dedo donde sea. Y lean
 la palabra y su significado 5 veces. Ayuda bastante.

 me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)


 [1]http://www.wordreference.**com/definicion/esperpentohttp://www.wordreference.com/definicion/esperpento


 para finalizar apeguemonos a las normas [7] es un simple recordatorio
 ( ahorita )
 y alguien borre estos temas innecesarios por favor.
 PD: NO respondan este mensage , ni para defenderse ni para apoyar, gracias

 
 [6] 
 

Re: [OT] descarga nlite W7

2013-03-03 Thread alexlikerock-Gmail




recuerden que Linux Torvals también fue un novato y cuantos les
criticaron al principio por lo que hacia, y ahora esta lista y el SWL
existen gracias a su gran ingeniosidad,


error  señor  Lic. Ruben Cervantes Rodríguez

no se llama Linux Torvals, se llama Linus Torvalds [3,4]


no invento este OS [1,2 y 5 ] definformado licenciado,

fue Richard Stallman

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman#Iniciativa_GNU

Linus Torvalds solo le lloro a Andrew S. Tanenbaum  que le vendiera el 
codigo fuente de minix para modificarlo,

hasta q tanenbaum se lo vendio,
pero si no hubiese pasado asi seria un don-nadie.


 (Para mi el

hilo está cerrado)


para mi tambien esta respuesta es de caracter informativo.


y como dato extra  positivo que aportar dado que yo si me interese por 
enviar cartas en texto plano


http://wiki.debian.org/es/DebianMailingLists#C.2BAPM-mo_enviar_mensajes_a_la_lista_usando_un_formato_de_texto_plano

o como diria camaleon
(ese html)


[1] http://www.gnu.org/home.es.html
[2] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU
[3] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_%28n%C3%BAcleo%29
[4] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds
[5] 
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversia_por_la_denominaci%C3%B3n_GNU/Linux



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133180d.2000...@gmail.com



Re: [OT] descarga nlite W7

2013-03-03 Thread alexlikerock-Gmail

On 03/03/13 02:25, francisco cid wrote:

ni se imaginan cuanto ancho de banda me gastó, recibir este correo,ai
alguien se equivoca, haganselo saber pero no lo destruyan con
comentarios poco contructivos.


El 3 de marzo de 2013 05:57, alexlikerock-Gmail alexliker...@gmail.com
mailto:alexliker...@gmail.com escribió:

1.-antes que nada  kiero agradecer a las criticas constructivas
me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)

2do. en segunda no keria responder este troleo  que se  levanto tras
mi critica-reclamo-anglicismo (etc,etc, o como lo kieran definir)
por que no kiero colaborar a meterle mas spam a la lista,de ser
pocible eliminen este tema, pero esta respuesta creo q puede ser
constructiva.
3.-este tema se me ace absurdo que no tiene sentido desperdiciar
nuestras mentes, tiempo y valor. creo q simplemete tenemos q dejar a
un lado  no vale la pena este debate. este es una lista de
soporte/ense#ar en debian y PUNTO.



http://wiki.debian.org/es/NormasLista#resumen   punto #5


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513318bf.3080...@gmail.com



Re: [OT] descarga nlite W7

2013-03-03 Thread francisco cid
El 3 de marzo de 2013 05:57, alexlikerock-Gmail
alexliker...@gmail.comescribió:

 1.-antes que nada  kiero agradecer a las criticas constructivas
 me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)

 2do. en segunda no QUEeria responder este troleo  que se  levanto tras mi
 CRÍtica-reclÁmo-anglicismo (etc,etc, o como lo QUieran definir) por que no
 QUiero colaborar a meterle mÁs spam a la lista,de ser poSible eliminen este
 tema, pero esta respuesta creo qUE puede ser constructiva.
 3.-este tema se me Hace absurdo que no tiene sentido desperdiciar nuestras
 mentes, tiempo y valor. creo qUE simplemete tenemos q dejar a un lado  no
 vale la pena Éste debate. este es una lista de soporte/ense#ar en debian y
 PUNTO.



te corrigí el primer párrafo, revisa tu ortografia, ¡en buena onda!



 ruben , definitivamente estas   MUY  equibocado de lugar, no vuelvas a
 acer este tipo de peticion de ayuda  o te reportaremos como spam ,

 (...)

 Creo que te has pasado un poco. Un poco bastante. Y ese tono amenazador
 que empleas tampoco ayuda :-/

  Bien lo dices, creo, yo no lo creo así.



 genial apoyo !  (Y)

  No sé a quién te refieres cuando dices reportaremos (en plural), yo no
 voy a reportar nada a nadie y en todo caso sería informar que
 reportar es un anglicismo horrible por muy aceptado por la RAE que esté
 (en mi opinión, erróneamente).

 Personalmente yo si lo reportaría.

 encontre apoyo asi que mas de uno piensa como yo que se debe reportar ,
 por eso me adelante y dije en plural

  ¿De donde has sacado que es un anglicismo?, puede ser usado informar
 pero ambos estarían correctos.
   Ya, ok sabes mucho, ayudas mucho, demasiado a veces pero esa es mi
 opinión, pero ya como que te pasas, das cátedra en todo y a todos, te
 has transformado en una especie de dueña de la lista

 en esto de ...la due#a de la lista  si lo creo pues ami tambien me pasa
 , q  saber tanto de algo despues uno como persona se vuelve AUTORITARIO,

  creo q tienes q pensar eso camaleon, es verdad sabes mucho y resuelves
 muchos problemas , pero en este caso nesecitavas resaltar criticas buenas
 tambien  como que acerte  como que el Licenciado ruben.cervantes estaba
 metiendo off-topin  y no solo las malas pareciendo una mujer frustrada [6]
 (con el devido respeto )

y te informo que
 no lo eres, si hay algunos que te siguen haya ellos, pero a otros que
 no nos gusta tu actitud de querer siempre saberlo todo y tener la
 última palabra en todo.



 PD.  Ohhh   hay vida más allá del teclado.


 en esto estoy muy de acuerdo. siempre empezamos a responder así cuando nos
 sentimos incómodos, aburridos (tanto responder o trabajo,) , fastidiados,
 sin ganas de ayudar y simplemente por responder la carta por costumbre.
 ese es momento de soltar el teclado un rato




 


  No me quería meter en este asunto, pero viendo ese esperpento[1] de
 mensaje, y probablemente, también es un esperpento de persona,

 si estoy de acuerdo con tigo q soy un esperpento

tengo
 que decir que es una ofensa al idioma leer eso. No sólo con el tono
 ofensivo, sino que comete tantas faltas de ortografía.

 tengo  mucha falta de ortografia pues nunca tube buenos maestros de
 espa#ol (exceptuando uno) y sumandole a eso que use mucho el messenger,
 este es un resultado

¿Seguro lo
 redactó pensando en su aborrecimiento al Windows?


 ahun  si tengo aborrecimiento a Güindow$ en la mayoria de  las veces
 esta ves NO FUE ASI ,
  en la carta orinal resalte mi motivo de molestia


 

 justo ahora tengo que leer 107 cartas de esta lista de correo, y si todos
 pensaran como tu se conver tirian en 307 o mas!

 

 que se apega las normas de la lista [7] a el punto
 #2,
 #4 (---no estoy seguro de este),
 #7,
 y el mas importante #9 ,
  #10 (este lo aplica altamente en la seccion y otras normas de
 sentido comun 
 ¿Pues que rayos tiene que pedir nlite para W7 en una lsita de debian?)
 pero en fin . no sigamos con este tema



  Hagan un traceroute,
 emailtracer, o como lo llamen, y verán de dónde mando este mensaje.

 lo mande de mi debian;
 $ uname -a
 Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2 i686 GNU/Linux
 $ icedove -v
  Icedove 17.0




 ¡Ah! Y hagan este ejercicio (lleva sólo 5 minutos): tomen un
 diccionario, o un tomo de la enciclopedia, cierren los ojos, y denle 5
 vueltas, abran una página al azar y coloquen el dedo donde sea. Y lean
 la palabra y su significado 5 veces. Ayuda bastante.

 me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)


 [1]http://www.wordreference.**com/definicion/esperpentohttp://www.wordreference.com/definicion/esperpento


 para finalizar apeguemonos a las normas [7] es un simple recordatorio
 ( ahorita )
 y alguien borre estos temas innecesarios por favor.
 PD: NO respondan este mensage , ni para defenderse ni para apoyar, gracias

 
 [6] 
 

ortografía

2013-03-03 Thread alexlikerock-Gmail




te corrigí el primer párrafo, revisa tu ortografia, ¡en buena onda!


claro q lo tomo como ¡en buena onda!, no te preocupes.

buscando un poco en las normas encontre esto

http://wiki.debian.org/es/NormasLista#porque

3er punto Escribir correcta y formalmente

La lista de Debian en español se lee en muchos países diferentes. Si 
pretendes darle a tu mensaje un toque informal lo más que puedes 
conseguir es que haya gente que no te entienda o, peor aún, que te 
malinterprete y se ofenda.




no creo q no se entienda el parrafo que me corregiste.

por otro lado no encontre la norma escribir con ortografia correcta en 
las listas.


eso lo entendi como una sugerencia (wiki.debian), si me ekivoco...
 aganmelo lo saber,
o si la gran mayoria de ustedes lo manejan asi ahunque no este en las 
normas, tambien aganme lo saber,

con alguna base, claro.
saludos.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513322a9.9070...@gmail.com



Re: evolution y gmail, timeout

2013-03-03 Thread alexlikerock-Gmail





Y cuando intento enviar mensajes se queja de esto:

Error mientras estaba Enviando mensaje. Error en la respuesta de
bienvenida: I/O Operation timed outl...





¿a alguien mas le ocurrió algo similar?


ami me paso eso y es por que meti mal la contrase#a
o no tenia activado el POP3 en Gmail, no recuerdo muy bien


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51332357.4040...@gmail.com



Re: tux guitar no suena

2013-03-03 Thread francisco cid
El 2 de marzo de 2013 09:41, Felix Perez felix.listadeb...@gmail.comescribió:

 El día 2 de marzo de 2013 04:24, francisco cid
 francisco...@gmail.com escribió:
  gracias a todos, pude solucionar el problema!
 

 Que bien y agradezco tu buena disposición al compartir la solución,
 así si alguien más le sucede lo mismo se beneficiará de tu
 experiencia.

 Nuevamente gracias.




 los siento, la solucion fué instalar timidy y seleccionar el puerto
 [128:0] en la configuracion de sonido

 
  El 2 de marzo de 2013 01:27, fuente obejuna obeju...@gmail.com
 escribió:
 
 
  Perdón, lo mandé como privado. Va de nuevo.
 
  El 2 de marzo de 2013 00:45, francisco cid francisco...@gmail.com
  escribió:
 
  root@francisco:/home/francisco# tuxguitar
  $MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME not valid : check doc shipped w/ tuxguitar
  /dev/sequencer: No existe el fichero o el directorio
 
 
  eso fue lo que me salió
 
 
  El 2 de marzo de 2013 00:17, Juan Lavieri jlavi...@gmail.com
 escribió:
 
  Hola
 
  El 01/03/13 22:00, francisco cid escribió:
 
  hola, instalé tux guitar version 1,2 y no puedo hacer que suenen las
  tablaturas, el sonido funciona bien en las demas aplicaciones, uso
 debian
  testing amd 64
 
 
  Trata de ejecutarlo desde un terminal gráfico y mira qué mensajes te
  arroja.
 
  Sin esos mensajes es muy poca la ayuda que te podremos prestar.
 
  saludos!
 
 
  Saludos
 
  Juan Lavieri
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  listmas...@lists.debian.org
  Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51316f5f.8060...@gmail.com
 
 
  Hola, fijate si no te anda faltando el timidity. Instalalo con aptitude
  # aptitude update ; aptitude install timidity
  y después vas a la configuración de tuxguitar (herramientas -
  preferencias o F7) y en la parte de sonido configurás algún puerto del
  timidity (creo que tendrías que tener 4) algo así como:
  TiMidity port 0 [128:0]
 
  ¡Salud!
 
 



 --
 usuario linux  #274354
 normas de la lista:  http://wiki.debian.org/es/NormasLista
 como hacer preguntas inteligentes:
 http://www.sindominio.net/ayuda/preguntas-inteligentes.html


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
 http://lists.debian.org/caaizax483-9rrffyv87ilqtfahdxxz7d0tgludw7vettops...@mail.gmail.com




Re: Instalar driver para Atheros AR8162 (Era: debían inspiron 5420)

2013-03-03 Thread Camaleón
El Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:27:48 -0500, Pablo Magé escribió:

 Rectifico lo enviado:

:-)
 
 El 2 de marzo de 2013 19:24, Pablo Magé pma...@gmail.com escribió:
 
 

 El 2 de marzo de 2013 13:51, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió:

(...)

  Pero cuando ejecuté el comando make, obtuve el siguiente mensaje de
  error:
  make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/build: No existe el fichero o
  el directorio. Alto.u
  make: *** [modules] Error 2
 
   Que debo hacer para que el directorio build se genere?

 Asegúrate de que has instalado correctamente esos dos paquetes y
 prueba de nuevou.



 Ejecute nuevamente el procedimeiento según lo indicado: 
 apt-get install build-essential linux-headers-$(uname -r)

Ahora sí.  

 make
 make install

Entiendo que no has tenido ningún problema para compilarlo.

 Pero al ejecutar el comando:
 modprobe alx
 Emite el siguiente mensaje de error:
 FATAL: Error inserting
 alx(/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/update/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/alx/alx.ko):Unknown
 symbol in module, or unknown parameter(see dmesg)
 
 Ya verifique que alx.ko existe. Que podrá ser ahora?

Revisa el dmesg como te indica, pero ese mensaje parece indicar una
incompatibilidad entre el módulo compilado y el kernel actual aunque 
el paquete compat-drivers parece tener soporte para kernels antiguos.

Quizá es que te saltaste el paso de descarga de módulos (make unload) 
tal y como indican en la documentación:

https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Documentation/compat-drivers#Unloading_your_old_distribution_drivers

Saludos,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgvo02$h3c$1...@ger.gmane.org



[OT] Re: ortografía

2013-03-03 Thread Camaleón
El Sun, 03 Mar 2013 03:15:05 -0700, alexlikerock-Gmail escribió:

 te corrigí el primer párrafo, revisa tu ortografia, ¡en buena onda!

 claro q lo tomo como ¡en buena onda!, no te preocupes.
 
 buscando un poco en las normas encontre esto
 
 http://wiki.debian.org/es/NormasLista#porque
 
 3er punto Escribir correcta y formalmente
 
 La lista de Debian en español se lee en muchos países diferentes. Si
 pretendes darle a tu mensaje un toque informal lo más que puedes
 conseguir es que haya gente que no te entienda o, peor aún, que te
 malinterprete y se ofenda.
 
 
 
 no creo q no se entienda el parrafo que me corregiste.

Si sólo fuera un párrafo... es que no se entiende el correo completo y no 
sólo por las faltas de ortografía (que ahí ya no me meto) sino por el 
formato, que lo has destrozado, vamos, ininteligible.

 por otro lado no encontre la norma escribir con ortografia correcta en
 las listas.

(...)

Verás, en la vida hay cosas que se sobreentienden y que no hace falta 
que veas escritas como sugerencias o normas como por ejemplo escribir 
de una forma mínimamente correcta en una lista de correo técnica en 
español cuya base es la palabra escrita. Si no cuidas ni el fondo ni la 
forma escribirás churros que nadie podrá descifrar.

Si me dijeras que tu primer idioma no es el español, aún tendrías excusa, 
al menos en cuanto a la ortografía y la sintaxis...

Saludos,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgvpg2$h3c$3...@ger.gmane.org



Re: evolution y gmail, timeout [solucionado]

2013-03-03 Thread Gonzalo Rivero
El sáb, 02-03-2013 a las 15:14 +, Camaleón escribió: 
 El Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:06:16 -0300, YOUR NAME escribió:
 ^
 
 Creo que te falta cambiar el nombre ;-P
 
  On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:12:09PM +, Camaleón wrote:
 
  Son dos opciones distintas, conviene que pruebes las dos:
  
  - smtps → puerto 465/ssl
  - starttls → puerto 587/tls
  
  Y por último, también podrías intentar configurarlo en el puerto
  25/ssl. Estas son las tres opciones disponibles.
  
  probé cambiando los puertos y nada. Ahora estoy en la computadora
  problemática, pero con el nunca bien ponderado mutt y no tengo
  problemas.
 
 Entonces el problema está localizado en Evolution.
 
  Evidentemente se pinchó mi evolution, que pena porque mientras todo
  parece mudarse a la web... yo lo estaba haciendo en evolution, solo me
  faltaba poder chatear por ahí xD Tocará llenar un reporte de bug
 
 Antes de mandar un informe de errores prueba a crear un nuevo usuario e 
 intenta configurar la cuenta de Gmail ahí e intenta enviar un correo, a 
 ver qué sucede, así descartas un problema en la configuración del perfil 
 del usuario.
 
intenté un nuevo usuario, configuré y... anda %#@@x###%%*!
Entonces comencé de nuevo, pero ahora no pasé por 'cuentas en línea' de
gnome, sino desde evolution. Y funciona, de hecho este mail lo estoy
enviando por evolution, y si lo ven es que está bien.

Ahora solo me queda ver como recupero la agenda (de compromisos y cosas
por hacer) y la agenda de contactos, que no veo la opción pero esa es
otra historia...

 (si configuras una cuenta de tipo IMAP recuerda que tienes que dejarle 
 tiempo para que almacene en la caché local los mensajes de lo contrario 
 se te quedará bloqueado el cliente de correo)
 
 Saludos,
 
 -- 
 Camaleón
 
 


-- 
(-.(-.(-.(-.-).-).-).-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1362341503.5201.10.ca...@gonzalo.casa



disculpas correo basura

2013-03-03 Thread Exell Enrique . Franklin Jiménez
Cordial saludo, uyna de mis cuentas de correo fue vulnerada 
por favor hacer caso omiso a correos cuyo asunto
contenga  «hey!» o «how are you» o similares
estoy tomando las medidas correctivas
gracias
E.E.F.J.
araw...@ieee.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362363067.87085.yahoomailclas...@web160901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com



Re: [OT] descarga nlite W7

2013-03-03 Thread Maykel Franco Hernandez
El 03/03/2013 10:45, francisco cid francisco...@gmail.com escribió:




 El 3 de marzo de 2013 05:57, alexlikerock-Gmail alexliker...@gmail.com
escribió:

 1.-antes que nada  kiero agradecer a las criticas constructivas
 me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)

 2do. en segunda no QUEeria responder este troleo  que se  levanto tras
mi CRÍtica-reclÁmo-anglicismo (etc,etc, o como lo QUieran definir) por que
no QUiero colaborar a meterle mÁs spam a la lista,de ser poSible eliminen
este tema, pero esta respuesta creo qUE puede ser constructiva.
 3.-este tema se me Hace absurdo que no tiene sentido desperdiciar
nuestras mentes, tiempo y valor. creo qUE simplemete tenemos q dejar a un
lado  no vale la pena Éste debate. este es una lista de soporte/ense#ar en
debian y PUNTO.



 te corrigí el primer párrafo, revisa tu ortografia, ¡en buena onda!



 ruben , definitivamente estas   MUY  equibocado de lugar, no vuelvas a
 acer este tipo de peticion de ayuda  o te reportaremos como spam ,

 (...)

 Creo que te has pasado un poco. Un poco bastante. Y ese tono
amenazador
 que empleas tampoco ayuda :-/

 Bien lo dices, creo, yo no lo creo así.



 genial apoyo !  (Y)

 No sé a quién te refieres cuando dices reportaremos (en plural), yo
no
 voy a reportar nada a nadie y en todo caso sería informar que
 reportar es un anglicismo horrible por muy aceptado por la RAE que
esté
 (en mi opinión, erróneamente).

 Personalmente yo si lo reportaría.

 encontre apoyo asi que mas de uno piensa como yo que se debe reportar ,
por eso me adelante y dije en plural

 ¿De donde has sacado que es un anglicismo?, puede ser usado informar
 pero ambos estarían correctos.
   Ya, ok sabes mucho, ayudas mucho, demasiado a veces pero esa es mi
 opinión, pero ya como que te pasas, das cátedra en todo y a todos, te
 has transformado en una especie de dueña de la lista

 en esto de ...la due#a de la lista  si lo creo pues ami tambien me
pasa , q  saber tanto de algo despues uno como persona se vuelve
AUTORITARIO,

  creo q tienes q pensar eso camaleon, es verdad sabes mucho y resuelves
muchos problemas , pero en este caso nesecitavas resaltar criticas buenas
tambien  como que acerte  como que el Licenciado ruben.cervantes estaba
metiendo off-topin  y no solo las malas pareciendo una mujer frustrada [6]
(con el devido respeto )

   y te informo que
 no lo eres, si hay algunos que te siguen haya ellos, pero a otros que
 no nos gusta tu actitud de querer siempre saberlo todo y tener la
 última palabra en todo.



 PD.  Ohhh   hay vida más allá del teclado.


 en esto estoy muy de acuerdo. siempre empezamos a responder así cuando
nos sentimos incómodos, aburridos (tanto responder o trabajo,) ,
fastidiados, sin ganas de ayudar y simplemente por responder la carta por
costumbre.
 ese es momento de soltar el teclado un rato




 


 No me quería meter en este asunto, pero viendo ese esperpento[1] de
 mensaje, y probablemente, también es un esperpento de persona,

 si estoy de acuerdo con tigo q soy un esperpento

   tengo
 que decir que es una ofensa al idioma leer eso. No sólo con el tono
 ofensivo, sino que comete tantas faltas de ortografía.

 tengo  mucha falta de ortografia pues nunca tube buenos maestros de
espa#ol (exceptuando uno) y sumandole a eso que use mucho el messenger,
este es un resultado

   ¿Seguro lo
 redactó pensando en su aborrecimiento al Windows?


 ahun  si tengo aborrecimiento a Güindow$ en la mayoria de  las veces
 esta ves NO FUE ASI ,
  en la carta orinal resalte mi motivo de molestia


 

 justo ahora tengo que leer 107 cartas de esta lista de correo, y si todos
 pensaran como tu se conver tirian en 307 o mas!

 

 que se apega las normas de la lista [7] a el punto
 #2,
 #4 (---no estoy seguro de este),
 #7,
 y el mas importante #9 ,
  #10 (este lo aplica altamente en la seccion y otras normas de
sentido comun 
 ¿Pues que rayos tiene que pedir nlite para W7 en una lsita de debian?)
 pero en fin . no sigamos con este tema



 Hagan un traceroute,
 emailtracer, o como lo llamen, y verán de dónde mando este mensaje.

 lo mande de mi debian;
 $ uname -a
 Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2 i686 GNU/Linux
 $ icedove -v
  Icedove 17.0




 ¡Ah! Y hagan este ejercicio (lleva sólo 5 minutos): tomen un
 diccionario, o un tomo de la enciclopedia, cierren los ojos, y denle 5
 vueltas, abran una página al azar y coloquen el dedo donde sea. Y lean
 la palabra y su significado 5 veces. Ayuda bastante.

 me gusto ese de darle vueltas al diccionario , ;-)   je je je  ;-)


 [1]http://www.wordreference.com/definicion/esperpento


 para finalizar apeguemonos a las normas [7] es un simple recordatorio
( ahorita )
 y alguien borre estos temas innecesarios por favor.
 PD: NO respondan este mensage , ni para defenderse ni para apoyar,
gracias

 
 [6] http://lema.rae.es/drae/srv/search?id=3cMzQhQBCDXX2wthGzLn
 [7] 

Re: RAID1 all bootable

2013-03-03 Thread Simon Vos
Hi Francesco,

I was under the impression your grub configuration was correct and the only
thing wrong was not having it installed on that one HDD. Of course your
grub configuration should point to the correct root.

In my little (easy) setup I have my main partition, boot partition and swap
partition in raid-1. The update-grub command was able to create the correct
entries for this configuration in my grub.cfg all by itself.

If grub is sending you to the rescue prompt it means something it wrong
with your grub configuration, so you'll have to fix that and install grub
again.

With kind regards,

Simon
On Mar 3, 2013 8:48 AM, Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Lennart, Hi Simon

 A proper understanding of mdadm is required. Hurrying with focus on
 codes for biochemical applications has brought me into a mess.

 Relying of all my data, and special compiled programs, present on
 another raid1 amd64 wheezy, I carried out a reinstall of amd64 wheezy
 on the machine with new HD. mdo (boot, ext20, md1 (LVM, home, usr,
 etc). GRUB was installed on /dev/sda

 Then the command

 grub-install /dev/sdb
  with reported installation compete. No errors reported.

 On rebooting, GRUB was no more found, entering in

 grub rescue 

 which should also be known accurately, because prefix/root/ are now wrong.


 The only care I exerted, was not to work with the machine where I have
 my data, until the damaged machine is in order again. At any event,
 how to install safely GRUB on both disks of a RAID1 is a must.

 Thanks for your kind advice.

 francesco pietra

 As to mdadm,

 On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Simon Vos simon...@gmail.com wrote:
  Have you assembled you raid devices again (mdadm --assemble /dev/mdX
  /dev/sdX)?
 
  That should still work with the disk that was used for your RAID-1, when
  that's done you can mount your disk, chroot into it and run grub-install
  /dev/sda (and grub-install /dev/sdb, so you won't have this problem in
 the
  future ;-)).
 
 
  On 2 March 2013 11:10, Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  A further piece on information. With knoppix 7.0,  the procedure for
  examining mdadm arrives at
 
  cat /proc/partitions
  sda
  sdb
 
  RAID1 (md0 md1) is not seen. I assume that this is the way Knoppix
  behaves in this situation.
 
  Thanks
  francesco pietra
 
 
  -- Forwarded message --
  From: Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com
  Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:11 AM
  Subject: Re: RAID1 all bootable
  To: Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, amd64 Debian
  debian-am...@lists.debian.org, debian-users
  debian-user@lists.debian.org
 
 
  Is this recipe devised for installing grub on both sda and sda with an
  undamaged RAID1?
 
  In my case, with the sda that contained grub loader replaced by a new
  disk, the rescue mode  (using the same CD installer for amd64 wheezy)
  did not find any partition. Inverting the SATA cables, same result.
 
  In both cases (I mean position of SATA cables) I went to the shell in
  the installer environment:
 
  #fisk /dev/sda (or sdb)
   device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, etc
  (expected for a raid)
 
  #dmesg |grep -i sd
   sda (and sbb): unknown partition table (expected for a raid), however
  md: raid0
  md: raid1
  were identified, along with rai4, 5, 6 etc (unfortunately | less
  does not work to see the whole message).
 
  Am I using the Rescue Mode improperly? I was unable to dig into the HD
  that contains md0 (booth loader, EXT2) and md1 ( LVM partitions home
  tmp usr opt var swap EXT3)
 
  Thanks a lot for your kind advice
 
  francesco pietra
 
 
 
  On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Lennart Sorensen
  lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
   On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:20:09PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
   Hi:
   With a raid1 amd64 wheezy, one of the two HDs got broken.
   Unfortunately, I had added grub to sda only, which is just the one
   broken. So that, when it is replaced with a fresh HD, the OS is not
   found. Inverting the SATA cables of course does not help (Operative
   System Not Found). In a previous similar circumstance, I was lucky
   that the broken HD was the one without gru.
  
   Is any way to recover? perhaps through Knoppix? I know how to look
   into undamaged RAID1 with Knoppix.
  
   Also, when making a fresh RAID1 from scratch, where to find a Debian
   description  of how to make both sda and sdb bootable? (which should
   be included by default, in my opinion)
  
   You can boot the install disk in rescue mode, select the root
 partition
   to chroot into, then run grub-install from there.
  
   When grub asks where to install, you should configure it for both sda
   and sdb.  I think 'dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc' is where that is
 selected.
   Might need it to use -plow to asks all levels of questions.  Not sure.
  
   --
   Len Sorensen
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
  with a subject of 

Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Brian
On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 19:56:43 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:

 On 2013/3/2 3:36 PM, Brian wrote:
 
 Your success was not a result of running the text-based Debian
 Installer. Forget about it. Try a bit of lateral, or even vertical,
 thinking. You may not realise it but substituting the USB stick you
 initially used for a USB hard disc is the crux of the matter.
 
 Observation: I'm struck by how some (many?) on this list tell me what
 I did (like I was asleep) and they're wrong. Please, pay attention...
 
 I did not make a substitution.

Ok. You are using USB flash/USB flash drive/USB hard disc/USB drive
interchangeably to refer to the same device? Its good to have that
clarified.

 1 - I installed Debian Live on a USB flash drive.
 2 - I booted to the USB flash drive.

This is the 1GB drive. Correct?

 3 - I invoked the GUI version of the Debian Installer and attempted to
 install Debian to a USB hard disk. - Both GRUB and LILO installation
 failed (GRUB is automatically tried, and fails, LILO is tried
 manually).

The install medium was the 8GB drive. Correct?

 4 - I invoked the text-based version of the Debian Installer targeted
 to the same USB hard disk and it succeeded.
 
 Of course, between steps 3  4 I had to reboot back to Windows and
 delete the USB hard disk partitions because deleting them inside the
 GUI Debian Installer didn't work, so I guess it actually has more
 bugs, eh?

No, no more bugs; you have had your fair share up to now. Don't be
greedy; leave some for other people. You've used the very fuzzy term
didn't work, but whatever you did triggered the same bug you had
already met.

   The point is: in both cases (unsuccessful  successful) the
 source of the install was Debian Live on a USB flash drive and the
 target of the install was a USB hard disk.

No, the two cases are definitely not identical.

Case1 (Unsuccessful) 


 The 8GB drive had previously had Debian Live installed to it. (This is
 clearly described in your first post). The target drive would contain
 information about an iso9660 filesystem. GRUB is designed not to
 install to a drive when it detects an iso9660 filesystem is present on
 it. [1]

Case1 (Successful)
--

 The 8GB drive had been processed by a Windows partitioning program.
 This wipes the information about the iso9660 file system. GRUB will
 now install.

 Now that you mention it - what does GRUB report in the syslog when it
 fails to install as you described in your very first post? Be daring;
 give it a go again, exactly as you related there.
 
 Sigh! How can I read the syslog? Where is it? /var/...blah-blah-blah... or
 /usr/...blah-blah-blah... or /sys/...blah-blah-blah... - I'm not a Linux
 user. And, since nothing gets written to the USB flash drive (remember: this
 Debian Live thinks it's running on CD), how would I find it at all!

http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/03/msg00187.html

 You succeeded (which is good) because you changed the install environment.
 This neither proves nor disproves anything.
 
 I did not change the install environment. What makes you think I did?

You have told us as much above. The state of the 8GB drive for the text
mode install is different from its initial state.

Incidentally, it is never a good idea to change more than one variable
at a time in an experiment. It can (as it has in your case) lead to
an invalid or erroneous conclusion.


[1] For those whose wish to test this assertion:

a) Plug a USB stick in and identify its device name with

dmesg | tail -n 20

b) Write an isohybrid ISO (an amd64 or i386 netinst would do) to the
   stick with

cat ISO  /dev/sdX

c) Install GRUB with

grub-install /dev/sdc

d) Re-partition the stick with fdisk and repeat c).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303112514.GT14686@desktop



Re: Converting a running system to a VirtualBox VM

2013-03-03 Thread Claudius Hubig
Dear Marc,

Marc Shapiro wrote:
 It runs fine on Squeeze using IA32-libs.  There does not seem to be a 
 native 64-bit version for linux.  I decided I would install Wheezy, 
 activate multi-arch for i386 and install the 32-bit version.  It was a 
 good plan, except that it does not work.  The Citrix Receiver apparently 
 requires nspluginwrapper, which is not available in Wheezy because it 
 depends on ia32-libs and so does not play nicely with multi-arch.

Really? At least for me, apt-get install nspluginwrapper appeared
positive that I could install it, although it would pull in fifty
trillions (65 MB) of extra i386 libraries.

  1) Stick with Squeeze indefinitely

Meh.

 So, does anyone know of a way to convert my current system to a 
 Virtualbox VM?  Or would it be better to just create a new machine and 
 install from scratch?  Getting Citrix Receiver running properly always 
 seems to be a hassle, so I thought that converting my current system 
 might be easier.  Any suggestions?

Do you have a possibility to boot into another system, so that you
don’t have to run VirtualBox on the system you want to clone? If so,
you can either tell VirtualBox to use the partition of your current
system as a physical disk, or you could boot the VM from some live
CD, partition it properly and then simply rsync -avH your system over.

Best,

Claudius
-- 
Please don’t CC me.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303114038.4a956...@ares.home.chubig.net



Sync Orage and Android (via calendarserver?)

2013-03-03 Thread Ramon Hofer
Hi all

I'm using Orage calendar on my Desktop. I have an Android tablet which 
I'd like to keep in sync with Orage. My desktop machine doesn't run all 
the time but I have a home server which does.

Therefore I'd like to put the shared calendar data on the server so that 
both the desktop and the tablet can get the data from there.

I have tried calendarserver but I couldn't connect Orage to it.

What do you use to keep your calendars in sync?

I'm not a big fan of putting my data to Google. That's why I'd like to 
find a solution where the data stays on my own devices.

Thanks for your suggestions.


Best
Ramon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgviat$et9$1...@ger.gmane.org



BSD more secure? was: Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-03 Thread Morel Bérenger
Le Sam 2 mars 2013 4:44, Miles Fidelman a écrit :
 Yaro Kasear wrote:

 I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
 really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
 (Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point
 to the concept of having a hardened base available, whihc Debian
 doesn't really offer.) Debian's known for being incredibly STABLE and
 high quality, and embraces FOSS standards pretty well.

 But unless Debian is bundling an alternate base system built around
 stuff like Tomoyo, GrSecurity, PaX, or SELinux and starts loading up
 their packages with hardened patchsets I wouldn't boast about it being a
 security-focused distro.


 The backports are an excellent thing. And the Debian security team
 does an excellent job. Lets just be realistic and a little more honest
 and say Debian is one of the most secure but I can't call it THE most
 secure unless the system can go hardened readily.


 Good point.  And when you start talking security to the point of serious
 testing and configuration control, I believe there are very few
 distributions that are on the DoD approved product list.

 On the BSD side, OpenBSD (despite the name), focuses on security, and
 has a pretty good reputation for being pretty secure.

 Miles Fidelman

I'm a newbie about kernels, but I have read (and maybe misunderstood)
which stated the bsd kernel was more secure. So, if you use the kfreebsd
kernel on a Debian, is it closer to that hardened security?
It is a real question, sorry for the OT, but I am just taking the occasion
to learn a bit about differences between those kernels.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/7a46abc194c89d0c4f01221ba9dac262.squir...@www.sud-ouest.org



Re: Converting a running system to a VirtualBox VM

2013-03-03 Thread Johan Grönqvist

2013-03-03 08:56, Marc Shapiro skrev:

So, does anyone know of a way to convert my current system to a
Virtualbox VM? Or would it be better to just create a new machine and
install from scratch? Getting Citrix Receiver running properly always
seems to be a hassle, so I thought that converting my current system
might be easier. Any suggestions?




http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch08.html#idp0176

I _think_ you _might_ want to try booting to a live-cd, and run 
something like


VBoxManage convertfromraw /dev/sda/ vboximage.vdi

Then try to boot the vboximage.vdi disk in vbox.

When I used it, I did roughly:

dd if=/dev/sda of=diskimage.dd
VBoxManage convertfromraw diskimage.dd vboximage.vdi

I have only tried it once, but it worked much better than I had expected 
(yes, I was more pessimistic than I should have been).


Regards

Johan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgvll2$h0p$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: BSD more secure? was: Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-03 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Morel B?renger wrote:

 Le Sam 2 mars 2013 4:44, Miles Fidelman a ?crit :
  Yaro Kasear wrote:
 
  I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
  really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
  (Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point
  to the concept of having a hardened base available, whihc Debian
  doesn't really offer.) Debian's known for being incredibly STABLE and
  high quality, and embraces FOSS standards pretty well.
 
  But unless Debian is bundling an alternate base system built around
  stuff like Tomoyo, GrSecurity, PaX, or SELinux and starts loading up
  their packages with hardened patchsets I wouldn't boast about it being a
  security-focused distro.
 
 
  The backports are an excellent thing. And the Debian security team
  does an excellent job. Lets just be realistic and a little more honest
  and say Debian is one of the most secure but I can't call it THE most
  secure unless the system can go hardened readily.
 
 
  Good point.  And when you start talking security to the point of serious
  testing and configuration control, I believe there are very few
  distributions that are on the DoD approved product list.
 
  On the BSD side, OpenBSD (despite the name), focuses on security, and
  has a pretty good reputation for being pretty secure.
 
  Miles Fidelman
 
 I'm a newbie about kernels, but I have read (and maybe misunderstood)
 which stated the bsd kernel was more secure. So, if you use the kfreebsd
 kernel on a Debian, is it closer to that hardened security?
 It is a real question, sorry for the OT, but I am just taking the occasion
 to learn a bit about differences between those kernels.
 
Has anyone looked at grml yet?
 
 

---
jude jdash...@shellworld.net
Remember Microsoft didn't write Tiger 10.4 or any of its successors.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.01.1303031023130.10...@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg



libreoffice does not auto-increment anymore

2013-03-03 Thread Lee Pool
Hi...

Why does version 3.5.4.2, Build-ID 350m1 not auto increment anymore?

It only does it for selecting days of the week. My version of libreoffice
on a rhel6 box does auto-increment for example, if I start with a time,
say 05:00 and want to go to 06:00,  ?

Is this now a functionality of libre-office on debian?


Regards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/54931.41.132.49.211.1362323223.squir...@webmail.tlabs.ac.za



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-03 Thread Brad Alexander
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
 Good point.  And when you start talking security to the point of serious
 testing and configuration control, I believe there are very few
 distributions that are on the DoD approved product list.

I've tried to stay out of this thread, but I feel that Ihave to comment.

The first point I need to make is that security is a mindset. Anything
can be made secure if you are willing to work at it and accept the
trade-offs that are required to be that way. Just like a training
Olympian cannot eat bacon sandwiches and still be ready to compete, an
administrator or user cannot just install any piece of software
whenever they want and hope it will stay secure. Take, for instance,
Java... I have an adage that usability times security is a constant.
The only truly secure system is one that is unplugged from the
network, powered off, packed in concrete, then fired into the
sun...But at that point, it isn't very usable, is it?

However, if you *are* willing to work for it, you can secure anything.
In 1995, the NSA granted Windows NT 3.5 an Orange Book C2 security
certification, C2 being Controlled Access Protection. Now the caveats
to this:

* The tested machine had no network connectivity;
* The tested machine had no floppy drive;
* The tested machine had no CD-ROM;

So the box could only run what was installed on it, and had no contact
with the outside world.

Now, having said that, you can take a page from MS here. Run the
absolute minimal software needed to accomplish the task at hand. In
this respect, servers are generally (and I *am* generalizing here)
than workstations, because of the required functionality of
workstations -- video drivers, games, internet communications, etc.
Take, for instance, my workstation versus my firewall. My workstation
has 2850 packages installed, while my firewall has a total of 369.
That's nearly an order of magnitude more software that can be attack
vectors.

Additionally, you can, especially if you have a home network, run
security tools, both on your machines and scanners. Nessus
(www.tenable.com) has a free Home Feed, you can run nmap against your
machines, etc. Get to know how they behave, then you will notice it
when things change.

Finally, have regular backups. If the worst does happen, you can
recover from it.

Security isn't a fire-and-forget solution. It is a constantly changing
threat environment.  You can't say I installed distro/OS abc, I'm
secure now. There are always people out there who want access to your
machine, for varying reasons.

--b

 On the BSD side, OpenBSD (despite the name), focuses on security, and has a
 pretty good reputation for being pretty secure.

 Miles Fidelman


 --
 In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
 In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra



 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject
 of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513175ae.5080...@meetinghouse.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cakmzw+bzpwmevxpotdt5vqmfjvy1djzibq1cmnm9m3qatoz...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 6:25 AM, Brian wrote:

On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 19:56:43 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:


On 2013/3/2 3:36 PM, Brian wrote:


Your success was not a result of running the text-based Debian
Installer. Forget about it. Try a bit of lateral, or even vertical,
thinking. You may not realise it but substituting the USB stick you
initially used for a USB hard disc is the crux of the matter.


Observation: I'm struck by how some (many?) on this list tell me what
I did (like I was asleep) and they're wrong. Please, pay attention...

I did not make a substitution.


Ok. You are using USB flash/USB flash drive/USB hard disc/USB drive
interchangeably to refer to the same device? Its good to have that
clarified.


No, Brian. I'm *not* using terms interchangeably. I'm *not* being sloppy. When 
I refer to a USB flash drive I mean a USB flash drive (also called a thumb 
drive by some people and plugged into one of my laptop's USB 2.0 ports), and 
when I refer to a USB hard drive mean a USB hard drive (a hard drive in a USB 
carrier and plugged into another of my laptop's USB 2.0 port via a cable).

I've thrown the thread away, but if you review my previous posts I'm pretty 
confident you will find that I've been absolutely consistent.

Source: USB flash drive booting Debian Live.
Target: USB hard drive.

Prior to attempting to install to the USB hard drive, I tried to install to an 
8-GB USB flash drive - that's right: initially there were 2 USB flash drives. I 
differentiated between them this way: source: 1-GB USB flash drive booting 
Debian Live, target: 8-GB USB flash drive. The reason I switched the target 
from an 8-GB USB flash drive to a USB hard drive is that someone said I 
couldn't install to a USB flash drive because of the flash structures and that 
I should switch to a hard drive because the MBR will be easier to deal with. I 
thought that suggestion was bogus, but I went along with it because I had a 
spare USB hard drive and because I wanted to move past that roadblock, even if 
bogus.


1 - I installed Debian Live on a USB flash drive.
2 - I booted to the USB flash drive.


This is the 1GB drive. Correct?


You got it! Yes.


3 - I invoked the GUI version of the Debian Installer and attempted to
 install Debian to a USB hard disk. - Both GRUB and LILO installation
 failed (GRUB is automatically tried, and fails, LILO is tried
 manually).


The install medium was the 8GB drive. Correct?


By this time the target was the USB hard drive... ... I think it's about 50 
GB but that's not really important.


4 - I invoked the text-based version of the Debian Installer targeted
 to the same USB hard disk and it succeeded.

Of course, between steps 3  4 I had to reboot back to Windows and
delete the USB hard disk partitions because deleting them inside the
GUI Debian Installer didn't work, so I guess it actually has more
bugs, eh?



No, no more bugs;


But they're so tasty! Can't I eat just one more?


you have had your fair share up to now. Don't be
greedy; leave some for other people. You've used the very fuzzy term
didn't work, but whatever you did triggered the same bug you had
already met.


Yes, same bug: GRUB failed to install automatically. Then, when I attempted to 
manually install LILO, it failed also. Note: when I write that I attempted to 
manually install LILO, I don't mean that I opened a terminal window and used 
the command line - I don't know how to do that - I mean I double-clicked LILO 
from the main menu.


   The point is: in both cases (unsuccessful  successful) the
source of the install was Debian Live on a USB flash drive and the
target of the install was a USB hard disk.


No, the two cases are definitely not identical.

Case1 (Unsuccessful)


  The 8GB drive had previously had Debian Live installed to it. (This is
  clearly described in your first post). The target drive would contain
  information about an iso9660 filesystem. GRUB is designed not to
  install to a drive when it detects an iso9660 filesystem is present on
  it. [1]


What you have written above is not correct. I *had* installed Debian Live+Gnome 
on the 8-GB USB flash drive *but* I didn't use it. I installed Debian Live+LXDE 
on the 1-GB USB flash drive and *used* *that* as the source. The target *was* 
going to be the 8-GB USB flash drive (overwriting the existing Debian Live 
installed on it), but, when that didn't work, I switched the target to the USB 
hard drive as suggested by someone.

To be comprehensive, while booted to Debian Live+LXDE (1-GB USB flash drive), I 
attempted (several times) to delete the partitions on the 8-GB USB flash drive 
(using the installers menu, selecting 'delete partition'). I know the installer 
was trying to delete the partitions because it would fail - I'd have to quit 
the installer and open up a file browser, unmount the existing volumes, then 
rerun the installer and attempt to delete the partitions again. When that 
didn't 

Re: Sync Orage and Android (via calendarserver?)

2013-03-03 Thread Erwan David

Le 03/03/2013 14:14, Ramon Hofer a écrit :

Hi all

I'm using Orage calendar on my Desktop. I have an Android tablet which
I'd like to keep in sync with Orage. My desktop machine doesn't run all
the time but I have a home server which does.

Therefore I'd like to put the shared calendar data on the server so that
both the desktop and the tablet can get the data from there.

I have tried calendarserver but I couldn't connect Orage to it.

What do you use to keep your calendars in sync?

I'm not a big fan of putting my data to Google. That's why I'd like to
find a solution where the data stays on my own devices.

Thanks for your suggestions.


Best
Ramon


I use davical, but it is the same protocol (caldav) as the one of 
calendarserver.


On android I use caldav-sync beta (non free for both meaning of free) 
which works well.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51339c0b.1010...@rail.eu.org



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
 Mark Filipak wrote:

 I've thrown the thread away,

Oh no, please Mark! We are wayting a step by step detailed description of
the procedure that makes GUI installer fail and text installer succeed.
Please, this is vital so we can reproduce, diagnose and fix the bug. If
you do not provide such step by step detailed descrition, you will be the
only winner. Please, share your knowledge with the community, help Debian
to be better.

By step by step detailed description I mean a description of what decision
you took at every single step of the installer, not just simply GUI
fails, text succeds. You don't have to read syslogs, you don't have to
pres Alt-F?, nothing like that. You just have to say at every single point
of the installation what the installer asked and what did you choose. And
do this for both the GUI and the text installers with the same hardware
and installation medium, in a way that GUI fails and text succeeds. No
interpretations nor guessing needed. Just plain facts, but they have to be
precise and step by step.

You know, finding a bug in the Debian installer is one of the greatest
contributions a user can make to Debian. We all will be very greateful if
you do this effort.

On behalf of all Debian users and developers who will benefit from your
contribution, I thank you.

João Luis Meloni Assirati.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/a7f64afddf056886f1225c1c1fd03d85.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 2:07 PM, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

I've thrown the thread away,


Oh no...

-big snip-

Ohmygod! João Luis, of course I'll reproduce it. That should be easy. After 
all, I've put 2 overtime days into it at this point. Kindly stand by. Right now 
I'm composing a post requesting help installing the WiFi driver.

I'll post back on this thread sometime later today after I'll reproduced the 
bug. Ciao.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133a17f.2060...@gmail.com



Re: Sync Orage and Android (via calendarserver?)

2013-03-03 Thread Mérof 42
2013/3/3 Ramon Hofer ramonho...@bluewin.ch

 Hi all

 I'm using Orage calendar on my Desktop. I have an Android tablet which
 I'd like to keep in sync with Orage. My desktop machine doesn't run all
 the time but I have a home server which does.

 Therefore I'd like to put the shared calendar data on the server so that
 both the desktop and the tablet can get the data from there.

 I have tried calendarserver but I couldn't connect Orage to it.

 What do you use to keep your calendars in sync?

 I'm not a big fan of putting my data to Google. That's why I'd like to
 find a solution where the data stays on my own devices.

 Thanks for your suggestions.

 I use Owncloud for my calendar, it provide a standard caldav server only
with a LAMP server.
Owncloud is also a file storage like dropbox, but with Owncloud you know
where is your data.


 Best
 Ramon



Latest sid upgrade breaks hot-key suspend-to-ram on T410

2013-03-03 Thread Joel Roth
Hi all,

Instead of letting my sid install age until something
breaks, I've been going through regular upgrade/dist-upgrade
cycles.

The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
Fn-F4).

I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.

Any idea against which package I should file a bug?

Regards,

Joel


-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303192440.GA1654@sprite



Re: Caldav client on Debian

2013-03-03 Thread Mérof 42
I already read this link and try some client, but I cant find what I want.
I keep searching.
Thanks.

2013/3/3 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org

 On 01.03.2013 22:04, Mérof 42 wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'm using Owncloud since few month, but with the web interface calendar
 is
  not really useful
  I'm looking for a simple caldav client, but I can't find one.
 
  Do you have any idea which client can I use?
 
  I'm searching a simple client, not like evolution who need a mailbox
  activated.

 http://wiki.davical.org/w/CalDAV_Clients

 --
 Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
 universe are pointed away from Earth?




Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Go Linux
--- On Sun, 3/3/13, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: Installation failed - and failed again...
 To: Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk
 Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Date: Sunday, March 3, 2013, 11:29 AM
 On 2013/3/3 6:25 AM, Brian wrote:
  On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 19:56:43 -0500, Mark Filipak
 wrote:

 
 The reason I
 switched the target from an 8-GB USB flash drive to a USB
 hard drive is that someone said I couldn't install to a USB
 flash drive because of the flash structures and that I
 should switch to a hard drive because the MBR will be easier
 to deal with. I thought that suggestion was bogus, but I
 went along with it because I had a spare USB hard drive and
 because I wanted to move past that roadblock, even if
 bogus.
 

--cut--

 
 when that didn't work, I switched the target to the USB hard
 drive as suggested by someone.
 
 



---


I think that suggestion started here ;)  . . .


--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: Installation failed
 To: Go Linux goli...@yahoo.com
 Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 2:42 PM
 On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:
  --- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive
 or nothing.
 
 
 
  Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard
 drive?



 That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...


 
The problem is not with USB.  The problem is flash vs hard drive.  AFAIK you 
CAN install grub2 to a hard drive and boot from it.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362338922.41883.yahoomailclas...@web163405.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

My objective:
Install WiFi driver into Debian+LXDE so that I can connect to the Internet.

My problem:
All the help I can find covers installing packages over the Internet. But I 
can't install packages over the Internet because I can't reach the Internet 
until I've installed the driver (not part of Debian because it's non-free) and 
a Network Manager (apparently, not part of Debian+LXDE ...or at least I can't 
find it under System Tools ...I think that's what the menu item is named).

Packages I have:
aptitude_0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1_amd64.deb// Debian - Package Manager
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb   // Debian - WiFi Drivers
synaptic_0.70~pre1+b1_amd64.deb  // Debian - Package Manager
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb// Debian (all but Gnome) - Network 
Manager
wireless-tools_30~pre9-5_amd64.deb   // Debian - WiFi Tools

Documentation I have:
(copied off the Internet and saved where I can get to them when I'm in 
Debian+LXDE...)
How to use a WiFi interface (http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse)
Intel PRO-Wireless 3945 and WiFi Link 4965 devices 
(http://wiki.debian.org/iwlegacy)
WiFi Ad-hoc Network (http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc)
iwconfig (http://wiki.debian.org/iwconfig)
iwconfig man page as a text file.

BTW, before I go on, I already tried opening a file manager (in Debian+LXDE) 
and simply double-clicking one of the .deb files. Nothing happened.

I don't know what to do or what I'll need once I'm booted back into Debian+LXDE 
...remember: I won't have Internet. Assuming that I'll need to know how to run 
a Package Manager, I've looked at the following 
(http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.en.html#contents):

(Before listing the contents of the appropriate section of debian-faq below, I need to say that I 
really, really tried to read this stuff. My eyes glazed over. I looked for something like how 
to install a deb binary but couldn't find it. As I read the details of what I couldn't relate 
to and what I didn't understand and what I don't really care about - God created the Earth in 6 
days so that we could argue over it forever after - I had my hands full simply trying to stay 
awake. Forgive me but I don't want to know the excruciating details of Linux and how it works. I'm 
not going to stand back after a year of study saying, My, that's wonderful!. I... 
don't... care. I'm here to use Linux, not to praise it. My objective is to copy stuff I *might* 
need for offline use.)

7 Basics of the Debian package management system
7.1 What is a Debian package?
7.2 What is the format of a Debian binary package?
7.3 Why are Debian package file names so long?
7.4 What is a Debian control file?
7.5 What is a Debian conffile?
7.6 What is a Debian preinst, postinst, prerm, and postrm script?
7.7 What is an Essential, Required, Important, Standard, Optional, or Extra 
package?
7.8 What is a Virtual Package?
7.9 What is meant by saying that a package Depends, Recommends, Suggests, 
Conflicts, Replaces, Breaks or Provides another package?
7.10 What is meant by Pre-Depends?
7.11 What is meant by unknown, install, remove, purge and hold in the package 
status?
7.12 How do I put a package on hold?
7.13 How do I install a source package?
7.14 How do I build binary packages from a source package?
7.15 How do I create Debian packages myself?
8 The Debian package management tools
8.1 What programs does Debian provide for managing its packages?
8.1.1 dpkg
8.1.2 APT
8.1.3 aptitude
8.1.4 synaptic
8.1.5 tasksel
8.1.6 Other package management tools
8.2 Debian claims to be able to update a running program; how is this 
accomplished?
8.3 How can I tell what packages are already installed on a Debian system?
8.4 How to display the files of a package installed?
8.5 How can I find out what package produced a particular file?
8.6 Why doesn't get `foo-data' removed when I uninstall `foo'? How do I make 
sure old unused library-packages get purged?
9 Keeping your Debian system up-to-date
9.1 How can I keep my Debian system current?
9.1.1 aptitude
9.1.2 apt-get, dselect and apt-cdrom
9.1.3 aptitude
9.1.4 mirror
9.1.5 dpkg-mountable
9.2 Must I go into single user mode in order to upgrade a package?
9.3 Do I have to keep all those .deb archive files on my disk?
9.4 How can I keep a log of the packages I added to the system? I'd like to 
know when which package upgrades and removals have occured!
9.5 Can I automatically update the system?
9.6 I have several machines how can I download the updates only one time?

You guys know the stuff above. I'd be willing to *try* to read it if you think I'll need 
it, but please remember: all I want is to install the WiFi driver, 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb. Perhaps a year from now I'll step back and look 
at Linux and say, That's wonderful! but I doubt it. However, one thing's for 
certain: If I don't succeed with this, a year from now I will not be running Linux.

Any help gratefully appreciated!

Thanks, and Ciao.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, 

Re: Latest sid upgrade breaks hot-key suspend-to-ram on T410

2013-03-03 Thread Claudius Hubig
Dear Joel,

Joel Roth wrote:
 The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
 Fn-F4).
 
 I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.

Cool. Does pm-suspend (a wrapper that does some funky things before
calling s2ram) work, too?

 Any idea against which package I should file a bug?

At least here (T410s), Fn-F4 generates an ACPI event that is then
handled by an appropriate file in /etc/acpi/events, which in turn
calls some script to do the actual suspending.

If you have a similarly ‘bare’ setup without other daemons
(gnome-power-manager etc.), you might want to check there.

Otherwise, you can check /var/log/apt/history.log to see which
packages were upgraded last or at least give us some more information - 
Which desktop environment? Are any power managers running? If so,
which?

Best,

Claudius
-- 
Please don’t CC me.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303193841.467ce...@ares.home.chubig.net



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 2:28 PM, Go Linux wrote:

--- On Sun, 3/3/13, Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/3 6:25 AM, Brian wrote:

On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 19:56:43 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:

The reason I
switched the target from an 8-GB USB flash drive to a USB
hard drive is that someone said I couldn't install to a USB
flash drive because of the flash structures and that I
should switch to a hard drive because the MBR will be easier
to deal with. I thought that suggestion was bogus, but I
went along with it because I had a spare USB hard drive and
because I wanted to move past that roadblock, even if
bogus.

--cut--

when that didn't work, I switched the target to the USB hard
drive as suggested by someone.

I think that suggestion started here ;)  . . .

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com wrote:

On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com

wrote:



I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive

or nothing.


Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard

drive?

That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...


The problem is not with USB.  The problem is flash vs hard drive.  AFAIK you 
CAN install grub2 to a hard drive and boot from it.


Thanks for dredging this out. Yes, that's when I switched the target from an 
8-GB USB flash drive to a USB hard drive. Whether, in fact, what was written is 
true: that grub will not install to a flash drive, remains to be tested. Having 
installed to a USB hard drive, my next task will be installing to a USB flash 
drive. That may fail as predicted, but it's worth a try. ...I think I remember 
reading a few years ago that there exists a grub-replacement specifically for 
flash drives.

I'm sorry if some folks have been confused about the identity of the target. Forget the 8-GB USB 
flash drive. The problem is with installation to a USB hard drive. It occurs only with the GUI 
installer, not the text-mode installer. Now, understand, by text-mode installer, I mean 
the menu-driven, non-GUI installer. I do not mean a command-line installer (if there even *is* one 
of those). The term text-mode is used by the Debian Live+LXDE boot menu.

And before I leave this (to return later today with a great many results), I'd 
like to apologize for starting 3 differing threads. I would not normally do 
that, but I did it because some people were gleefully coming after me poisoning 
each existing thread with posts about trolling.

Ciao - Mark.  



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133b099.2040...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Brian
On Sun 03 Mar 2013 at 12:29:44 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:

 On 2013/3/3 6:25 AM, Brian wrote:
 
 Ok. You are using USB flash/USB flash drive/USB hard disc/USB drive
 interchangeably to refer to the same device? Its good to have that
 clarified.

[Snip]

 Prior to attempting to install to the USB hard drive, I tried to install to
 an 8-GB USB flash drive - that's right: initially there were 2 USB flash
 drives. I differentiated between them this way: source: 1-GB USB flash drive
 booting Debian Live, target: 8-GB USB flash drive. The reason I switched the
 target from an 8-GB USB flash drive to a USB hard drive is that someone said
 I couldn't install to a USB flash drive because of the flash structures and
 that I should switch to a hard drive because the MBR will be easier to deal
 with. I thought that suggestion was bogus, but I went along with it because I
 had a spare USB hard drive and because I wanted to move past that roadblock,
 even if bogus.

In a previous mail I said:

 You may not realise it but substituting the USB stick you
 initially used for a USB hard disc is the crux of the matter.

You replied:

 I did not make a substitution.

So I attempted to accomodate this information by thinking in terms of a
lack of understanding on my part. It turns out I was correct to begin
with. 

 Case1 (Unsuccessful)
 
 
   The 8GB drive had previously had Debian Live installed to it. (This is
   clearly described in your first post). The target drive would contain
   information about an iso9660 filesystem. GRUB is designed not to
   install to a drive when it detects an iso9660 filesystem is present on
   it. [1]
 
 What you have written above is not correct. I *had* installed Debian
 Live+Gnome on the 8-GB USB flash drive *but* I didn't use it. I
 installed Debian Live+LXDE on the 1-GB USB flash drive and *used*
 *that* as the source. The target *was* going to be the 8-GB USB flash
 drive (overwriting the existing Debian Live installed on it), but,
 when that didn't work, I switched the target to the USB hard drive as
 suggested by someone.

It is 100% correct. From your first post

   1.1 - Copied the Debian-Gnome Live ISO to an 8-GB USB.

   6 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
   6.1 - Attempted install to 8-GB USB (overwrite Debian-Gnome already on it).
   6.2 - Install failed!

Had the USB hard drive been used instead of the 8-GB USB and *exactly*
the same install attempted it too would have failed. The nature or size
of the device being installed to is immaterial, as is whether it is a
text mode or GUI install. The only thing that matters is that the device
has previously had an isohybrid ISO written to it.

I even provide a way of seeing how GRUB reacts to being put on a device
which has held an isohybrid ISO. You now have a functioning Debian
machine so could follow the procedure given. I cannot say if it will
involve more or less effort than posting a syslog excerpt. :)

[A largish snip. The content appears to be a distraction from the main
issue]

 You have told us as much above. The state of the 8GB drive for the text
 mode install is different from its initial state.
 
 I was not using the 8-GB USB flash drive.

The state of the USB hard drive for the text mode install was different
from the state of the 8-GB USB flash drive.

 Incidentally, it is never a good idea to change more than one variable
 at a time in an experiment. It can (as it has in your case) lead to
 an invalid or erroneous conclusion.
 
 I did not change variables. Source: 1-GB USB flash drive. Target: USB hard 
 drive.

Initially - Source: 1-GB USB flash drive. Target: 8-GB USB flash drive
with an isohybrid ISO written to it.

At a later time - Source: 1-GB USB flash drive. Target: USB hard drive
   which had never had an isohybrid ISO written to it.

A second variable is the install mode. You altered this at the same time
you replaced the 8-GB USB flash drive with a USB hard drive.

For those who wish to reproduce the bug.


Write a netinst image to two USB devices. Boot from one device and
install to the second one. Try text and GUI modes. It's about an hour's
work at most.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303203339.GV14686@desktop



Re: Two copies of E-Mail (Re: I wish to advocate linux)

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
David Guntner wrote:
 Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
  For one I use the mailing list headers List-Id and List-Post.  Those
  are the standard headers and those are the best ones to use for filing
  mailing list messages.  Smart MUAs use those to know how to do a
  list-reply.  Therefore the copy I want is the copy that comes from the
  mailing list.
 
 Not every MUA does, however.  The one I'm using, for example, does not
 (or if it does, I've never figured out how to turn that feature on...).
  Therefor, I've also got a Procmail recipe that adds a Reply-To:
 pointing back to the list on my local copy (of debian-user, since it
 doesn't add one itself - on lists that do so, I don't use that rule) so
 that when I hit reply, it goes back to the list as it should since most
 of the time a reply should go back to the list when replying to a
 posting on the list.  And I don't want to have to remember to do it
 manually each time I reply. :-)

My takeaway is that you have applied a workaround that shouldn't be
needed to a problem that shouldn't exist.  Applying Reply-To destroys
the sender's use of Reply-To which is reserved for them to use.

The classic line here is, Now you have two problems.  :-)

 It all depends on your experiences and own requirements.  I for one am
 on a decade+ old list that was home grown - the guy running it rolled
 his own, so to speak.  It doesn't use a subject tag, and it has never
 had those now-standard List-ID headers, nor is it likely to anytime in
 the future.  So even if I *were* using a MUA that understands those
 headers, it would do me no good.

I would nag your buddy into adding those headers.  It will help modern
mail user agents to be able to do the right thing automatically.

 It has never occurred to me to ever filter based in a List-ID field,
 since back in the old days when I started doing this, they hadn't yet
 come into existence. :-)

Every decade or so it is good to take a breath and look around and
make smart upgrades to systems.  The Debian mailing lists have been
around for a long time and are basically a home grown system too
(using Smartlist) but they comply with modern standards.  I operate
several Majordomo mailing lists and they all comply with the modern
standards.  It is really as easy piping the message through formail
and having it add the headers.

 And even *after* coming into existence, you
 still have to *send* your message to the list in question, thus the To:
 or Cc: will *always* be there, regardless of the presence (or lack
 thereof) of a List-ID header.  Also, by filtering on those (To, Cc), it
 works 100% of the time - even if the above recipe deletes the list copy
 if it came in second. :-)

For a nasty example, I hate it when people BCC mailing lists.  Then
the To and CC fields are not able to reply to the mailing list because
they don't include it.  But since List-Post is added by the mailing
list that value is correct.  But that is an example of something that
shouldn't be happening.  Many lists block bcc to the list since that
is an anti-spam strategy too.

 For myself, this is what I use specifically for the Debian users list:
 ...
 It will pretty much catch the string being looked for if it shows up
 *anywhere* in the message headers. :-)  Since I've never filtered based
 on a header which may-or-may-not be there, deleting the second,
 duplicate copy of a message has never caused a problem even if that one
 was the list-processed copy.
 
 In fact, I would argue that using the above filter (TO_) is *less*
 problematic than the method you use, since deleting a duplicate
 Message-ID does have the potential to remove the copy that actually went
 through the list - it doesn't matter which one got to you first, since
 it *still* gets filtered into the correct folder.
 
 But again, it's all a matter of personal taste, personal experiences and
 personal requirements (like I said, I'm on a really old mailing list
 which has never had List-ID headers and most likely hell will freeze
 over before it gets them; the list has been around longer than the RFC
 which defines List-ID).

Yep.

  P.S.  Here is the procmail rules I use to file all Debian mailing list
  messages.
  
  :0
  * ^List-Id: .*debian-[-a-zA-Z0-9]+\.lists\.debian\.org
  * ^List-Id: .*debian-\/[-a-zA-Z0-9]+
  Lists/debian/$MATCH/
  
  :0
  * ^List-Id: .*[-a-zA-Z0-9]+\.lists\.alioth\.debian\.org
  * ^List-Id: .*\/[-a-zA-Z0-9]+
  Lists/debian/$MATCH/
 
 That's great for filing (and cool to know about, for mailing lists which
 include those standard headers).  How does it get rid of the dup when
 someone  does a To: the list and Cc: the person on the list he's
 replying to?

It doesn't.  Which is why I noted it as a post script.  But it is
related.

 (Remember, I sent the above recipe because someone was complaining
 about duplicate message, not that they didn't know how to filter
 them into a folder - in essence, you've provided an answer to a
 question that he didn't ask. 

Re: moving /var

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Mr G wrote:
 Why can't you just
 
 #mount --rebind /var /newvar

Because that won't copy the data into the new filesystem.  To do that
you do actually need to copy the data as described in the previous
messages.  (I prefer 'rsync -a' over 'cp -a' because rsync can be
restarted efficiently.)  Then once copied it needs to be swapped into
place.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
Brian wrote:

 Had the USB hard drive been used instead of the 8-GB USB and *exactly*
 the same install attempted it too would have failed. The nature or size
 of the device being installed to is immaterial, as is whether it is a
 text mode or GUI install. The only thing that matters is that the device
 has previously had an isohybrid ISO written to it.

[...]

 Write a netinst image to two USB devices. Boot from one device and
 install to the second one. Try text and GUI modes. It's about an hour's
 work at most.

But will this happen even if one formats the partition holding the iso?
What if the installation proccess is done normally, the target device that
happens to hold the iso is partitioned and all the partitions are
formatted? When grub gets to be installed, in the last installation step,
all the information that an iso existed before is gone, or no?

Anyway, it must be said that you did an impressive investigation with very
scarce resources to say the least, Brian!

João Luis.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/c369b4f7d1b839d68b3743240a09aced.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Joe
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:53:37 -0500
Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 My objective:
 Install WiFi driver into Debian+LXDE so that I can connect to the
 Internet.
 
 My problem:
 All the help I can find covers installing packages over the Internet.
 But I can't install packages over the Internet because I can't reach
 the Internet until I've installed the driver (not part of Debian
 because it's non-free) and a Network Manager (apparently, not part of
 Debian+LXDE ...or at least I can't find it under System Tools ...I
 think that's what the menu item is named).
 
Network manager is not actually necessary to do anything, and until
recently it had a rather poor reputation, usually being known as Notwork
Manager. It's quite big and overbearing, and has many plug-ins, for
OpenVPN, wi-fi, 3G dongles and other things. It does seem to work these
days, or at least the Sid version does. I don't have it on my
workstation, which is a purely wired-Ethernet machine, but both my
laptop and netbook have it.

 Packages I have:
 aptitude_0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1_amd64.deb// Debian - Package Manager
 firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb   // Debian - WiFi Drivers
 synaptic_0.70~pre1+b1_amd64.deb  // Debian - Package Manager
 wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb// Debian (all but Gnome) -
 Network Manager wireless-tools_30~pre9-5_amd64.deb   // Debian -
 WiFi Tools
 
 Documentation I have:
 (copied off the Internet and saved where I can get to them when I'm
 in Debian+LXDE...) How to use a WiFi
 interface (http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse) Intel PRO-Wireless
 3945 and WiFi Link 4965 devices (http://wiki.debian.org/iwlegacy)
 WiFi Ad-hoc Network (http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc)
 iwconfig (http://wiki.debian.org/iwconfig) iwconfig man page as a
 text file.
 
 BTW, before I go on, I already tried opening a file manager (in
 Debian+LXDE) and simply double-clicking one of the .deb files.
 Nothing happened.
 
There are packages which will install .deb files in this way, having
set up the right file association, but they are not installed by default
in LXDE. Anyway, the missing link here is that you use dpkg:

dpkg -i full-name-of-.deb-file

Assuming you have the right driver, you shouldn't have a problem. I've
never used wicd, but no doubt someone else will tell you if you need to
do anything with it. I'm not a big wireless fan. Network Manager Just
Works, or at least it does for me.

 I don't know what to do or what I'll need once I'm booted back into
 Debian+LXDE ...remember: I won't have Internet. Assuming that I'll
 need to know how to run a Package Manager, I've looked at the
 following
 (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.en.html#contents):

When you have Net access, there's a vast number of apt-get and aptitude
tutorials, or Synaptic is fairly intuitive to use without much help.

 
 (Before listing the contents of the appropriate section of debian-faq
 below, I need to say that I really, really tried to read this stuff.
 My eyes glazed over.

You must know, from long experience, that theory is almost useless
until you've done a bit of practice, by rote if necessary.

 
 You guys know the stuff above. I'd be willing to *try* to read it if
 you think I'll need it, 

No. I don't know most of that and, with three somewhat different Sid
installations, I probably do more upgrades than most people. I look
things up as and when I need them. I can't say offhand how to export an
Exchange mailbox, either, but I know how to find out how to do it, and
I have done it a few times.

Aptitude and apt-get will be installed by default, they both drive dpkg
which is the low-level package manager and is part of the Debian core.
Synaptic is a GUI program and I use it when Sid has issues with
upgrades, as it does occasionally, I find it faster than aptitude in
identifying things that are currently uninstallable. Some people never
use it, and my server doesn't have a GUI, so I obviously don't use it
there. Debian Stable is much better-behaved than Sid.

All three apt tools will install everything in the repositories they are
configured for, you only need dpkg for .deb files obtained elsewhere. I
use it for that maybe twice a year. A lot of Linux software has a .deb
available even if Debian has not yet included it in a distribution.

dpkg does have many other uses, but not for the beginner. Among other
things, it will pretty much copy a Debian installation, complete with
all software installed from the repositories. You can migrate from 32
bit to 64 bit hardware that way. Let's see you do that with Windows.

There is also a GUI Update Manager, but either apt-get or aptitude will
do updates from the command line with minimal effort.

 However, one thing's for certain: If I
 don't succeed with this, a year from now I will not be running Linux.

You think we care? It will be your loss.

You do realise, yet again, you are in an unusual situation? I can't
remember ever being stuck with a single 

Re: RAID1 all bootable

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Hi Francesco,

As far as I can determine reading this thread you have had a RAID1
with two disks sda and sdb.  The disk sda failed.  But grub was only
installed on the failed sda.  The disk sdb contains a mirror of
everything but does not boot.

Earlier in the thread Lennart gave an excellent suggestion:

Lennart Sorensen wrote:
 You can boot the install disk in rescue mode, select the root
 partition to chroot into, then run grub-install from there.
 
 When grub asks where to install, you should configure it for both sda
 and sdb.  I think 'dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc' is where that is
 selected.  Might need it to use -plow to asks all levels of questions.
 Not sure.

+1 for this suggestion.  This is definitely the way to go to fix your
problem.

Francesco Pietra wrote:
 In my case, with the sda that contained grub loader replaced by a new
 disk, the rescue mode  (using the same CD installer for amd64 wheezy)
 did not find any partition. Inverting the SATA cables, same result.

No partitions at all?  That is scary.  And I find it to be hard to
believe.  No partitions would mean that the data from your disks were
zeroed out.  Perhaps you were mistaken?  Please try it again.

 In both cases (I mean position of SATA cables) I went to the shell in
 the installer environment:

Don't work from the installer environment.  Work from the target
environment.  That is a critical difference!

 #fisk /dev/sda (or sdb)

fisk?  That command does not exist in the installer environment.
You must have been elsewhere.

  device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, etc
 (expected for a raid)

Try 'cat /proc/partitions' for a simple safe read-only start.

 #dmesg |grep -i sd
  sda (and sbb): unknown partition table (expected for a raid), however
 md: raid0
 md: raid1
 were identified, along with rai4, 5, 6 etc (unfortunately | less
 does not work to see the whole message).
 
 Am I using the Rescue Mode improperly? I was unable to dig into the HD
 that contains md0 (booth loader, EXT2) and md1 ( LVM partitions home
 tmp usr opt var swap EXT3)

I believe you are using rescue mode improperly.  I have written about
how to use rescue mode several times recently.  Here is one posting:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/01/msg00218.html

Here is the official documentation for it:

  http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch08s07.html.en

But that is fairly terse.  Let me say that the rescue mode looks just
like the install mode initially.  It will ask you keyboard and locale
questions and you might wonder if you are rescuing or installing!  But
it will have Rescue in the upper left corner so that you can tell
that you are not in install mode and be assured.  Get the tool set up
with keyboard, locale, timezone, and similar and eventually it will
give you a menu with a list of actions.  Here is a quick run-through.

  Advanced options...
  Rescue mode
  keyboard dialog
  ...starts networking...
  hostname dialog
  domainname dialog
  ...apt update release files...
  ...loading additional components, Retrieving udebs...
  ...detecting disks...

Then eventually it will get to a menu Enter rescue mode that will
ask what device to use as a root file system.  It will list the
partitions that it has automatically detected.

One of the menu entry items near the bottom will be Assemble RAID
array.  That will bring up the next dialog menu asking for partitions
to assemble.  Select the appropriate for your system.  Then continue.
Since at this point you have one disk with data and one disk without
it means you must assemble a degraded array with only one disk.
Select the disk with your data on it.  Start the array with that one
disk.

If you used LVM (I always do) then that should produce an additional
set of listings for the lvm volumes on your system including the root
logical volume.  Select it.

At that point it presents a menu Execute a shell in /dev/  That
should get you a shell on your system with the array mounted.  You
should 'cat /proc/mdstat' and verify that you have a degraded array
with one disk.

If you replaced sda with a new sda disk then sdb will contain your
data.  Assuming sdb1 for md0 and sdb5 for md1 would produce the need
for these commands.  Adjust those partitions as needed to match your
case.

Examine the arrays.  Assuming md0 is on your sdb1 then:

  mdadm --detail /dev/md0

  mdadm --examine /dev/sdb1

At that point I would do nothing before sync'ing the array to the new
disk.  If you have multiple arrays then sync each of them.  Adjust
these partition names as appropriate for your case as determined by
the above inspection.

  mdadm --manage /dev/md0 --add /dev/sdb1
  mdadm --manage /dev/md1 --add /dev/sdb5
  mdadm --manage /dev/md2 ... and so forth

If you have /boot on a separate partition then I would let it finish
before installing grub.  Or if it is on the main root partition then I
would let the entire root partition containing /boot finish syncing
before installing grub.


Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Roman V.Leon.

On 03.03.2013 23:53, Mark Filipak wrote:

My objective:
Install WiFi driver into Debian+LXDE so that I can connect to the Internet.

My problem:
All the help I can find covers installing packages over the Internet.
But I can't install packages over the Internet because I can't reach the
Internet until I've installed the driver (not part of Debian because
it's non-free) and a Network Manager (apparently, not part of
Debian+LXDE ...or at least I can't find it under System Tools ...I think
that's what the menu item is named).

Packages I have:
aptitude_0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1_amd64.deb // Debian - Package Manager
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb // Debian - WiFi Drivers
synaptic_0.70~pre1+b1_amd64.deb // Debian - Package Manager
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb // Debian (all but Gnome) - Network
Manager
wireless-tools_30~pre9-5_amd64.deb // Debian - WiFi Tools

Documentation I have:
(copied off the Internet and saved where I can get to them when I'm in
Debian+LXDE...)
How to use a WiFi interface (http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse)
Intel PRO-Wireless 3945 and WiFi Link 4965 devices
(http://wiki.debian.org/iwlegacy)
WiFi Ad-hoc Network (http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc)
iwconfig (http://wiki.debian.org/iwconfig)
iwconfig man page as a text file.

BTW, before I go on, I already tried opening a file manager (in
Debian+LXDE) and simply double-clicking one of the .deb files. Nothing
happened.

I don't know what to do or what I'll need once I'm booted back into
Debian+LXDE ...remember: I won't have Internet. Assuming that I'll need
to know how to run a Package Manager, I've looked at the following
(http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.en.html#contents):

(Before listing the contents of the appropriate section of debian-faq
below, I need to say that I really, really tried to read this stuff. My
eyes glazed over. I looked for something like how to install a deb
binary but couldn't find it. As I read the details of what I couldn't
relate to and what I didn't understand and what I don't really care
about - God created the Earth in 6 days so that we could argue over it
forever after - I had my hands full simply trying to stay awake. Forgive
me but I don't want to know the excruciating details of Linux and how it
works. I'm not going to stand back after a year of study saying, My,
that's wonderful!. I... don't... care. I'm here to use Linux, not to
praise it. My objective is to copy stuff I *might* need for offline use.)

7 Basics of the Debian package management system
7.1 What is a Debian package?
7.2 What is the format of a Debian binary package?
7.3 Why are Debian package file names so long?
7.4 What is a Debian control file?
7.5 What is a Debian conffile?
7.6 What is a Debian preinst, postinst, prerm, and postrm script?
7.7 What is an Essential, Required, Important, Standard, Optional, or
Extra package?
7.8 What is a Virtual Package?
7.9 What is meant by saying that a package Depends, Recommends,
Suggests, Conflicts, Replaces, Breaks or Provides another package?
7.10 What is meant by Pre-Depends?
7.11 What is meant by unknown, install, remove, purge and hold in the
package status?
7.12 How do I put a package on hold?
7.13 How do I install a source package?
7.14 How do I build binary packages from a source package?
7.15 How do I create Debian packages myself?
8 The Debian package management tools
8.1 What programs does Debian provide for managing its packages?
8.1.1 dpkg
8.1.2 APT
8.1.3 aptitude
8.1.4 synaptic
8.1.5 tasksel
8.1.6 Other package management tools
8.2 Debian claims to be able to update a running program; how is this
accomplished?
8.3 How can I tell what packages are already installed on a Debian system?
8.4 How to display the files of a package installed?
8.5 How can I find out what package produced a particular file?
8.6 Why doesn't get `foo-data' removed when I uninstall `foo'? How do I
make sure old unused library-packages get purged?
9 Keeping your Debian system up-to-date
9.1 How can I keep my Debian system current?
9.1.1 aptitude
9.1.2 apt-get, dselect and apt-cdrom
9.1.3 aptitude
9.1.4 mirror
9.1.5 dpkg-mountable
9.2 Must I go into single user mode in order to upgrade a package?
9.3 Do I have to keep all those .deb archive files on my disk?
9.4 How can I keep a log of the packages I added to the system? I'd like
to know when which package upgrades and removals have occured!
9.5 Can I automatically update the system?
9.6 I have several machines how can I download the updates only one time?

You guys know the stuff above. I'd be willing to *try* to read it if you
think I'll need it, but please remember: all I want is to install the
WiFi driver, firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb. Perhaps a year from
now I'll step back and look at Linux and say, That's wonderful! but I
doubt it. However, one thing's for certain: If I don't succeed with
this, a year from now I will not be running Linux.

Any help gratefully appreciated!

Thanks, and Ciao.



Hi Mark.
Why do you think you need 

Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 3:33 PM, Brian wrote:

On Sun 03 Mar 2013 at 12:29:44 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:


On 2013/3/3 6:25 AM, Brian wrote:


Ok. You are using USB flash/USB flash drive/USB hard disc/USB drive
interchangeably to refer to the same device? Its good to have that
clarified.


[Snip]


Prior to attempting to install to the USB hard drive, I tried to install to
an 8-GB USB flash drive - that's right: initially there were 2 USB flash
drives. I differentiated between them this way: source: 1-GB USB flash drive
booting Debian Live, target: 8-GB USB flash drive. The reason I switched the
target from an 8-GB USB flash drive to a USB hard drive is that someone said
I couldn't install to a USB flash drive because of the flash structures and
that I should switch to a hard drive because the MBR will be easier to deal
with. I thought that suggestion was bogus, but I went along with it because I
had a spare USB hard drive and because I wanted to move past that roadblock,
even if bogus.


In a previous mail I said:

  You may not realise it but substituting the USB stick you
  initially used for a USB hard disc is the crux of the matter.


ROFL! Now I get it. You don't mean what you wrote above. You mean that the initial target 
was a flash drive, then I switched the target to a hard drive. That's correct, but that's 
not what you say above. ...It's a matter of semantics and the use of the preposition 
for, but I won't belabor it. What's important is understanding...

First, I *really* appreciate your effort. You've a good heart. I hope I won't 
disappoint.

Second, Let's just forget about the 8-GB flash drive, okay? Pretend I never 
mentioned it. What's important is this:
Source: Debian Live+LXDE
Target: USB hard drive
Dbl-clicking the GUI Installer icon on the LXDE desktop ultimately fails at the 
step where GRUB is installed.
But running the 'Text-mode' installer from the boot menu succeeds.

Now, I think I also did run the GUI installer from the boot menu, and I think 
it failed also, but that's going to have to wait until I rerun this whole 
procedure and see what's repeatable. Stay tuned (...or don't).


You replied:

  I did not make a substitution.


What that means is: From the time that I tried to use the GUI installer targeting the 
hard disk, to the time that I succeeded with the text-mode installer 
targeting the hard disk, I did not make a substitution. You see, what I did before that 
(the steps targeting the 8-GB flash drive) is not really important or germane to the 
problem, but to be concise, Yes, indeed Brian you *are* correct. I *did* make a 
substitution, but that was early in the process and a long time before the bug became 
manifest. I'm so sorry for the confusion. Kindly accept my apology.


So I attempted to accomodate this information by thinking in terms of a
lack of understanding on my part. It turns out I was correct to begin
with.


Case1 (Unsuccessful)


  The 8GB drive had previously had Debian Live installed to it. (This is
  clearly described in your first post). The target drive would contain
  information about an iso9660 filesystem. GRUB is designed not to
  install to a drive when it detects an iso9660 filesystem is present on
  it. [1]


What you have written above is not correct. I *had* installed Debian
Live+Gnome on the 8-GB USB flash drive *but* I didn't use it. I
installed Debian Live+LXDE on the 1-GB USB flash drive and *used*
*that* as the source. The target *was* going to be the 8-GB USB flash
drive (overwriting the existing Debian Live installed on it), but,
when that didn't work, I switched the target to the USB hard drive as
suggested by someone.


It is 100% correct. From your first post

1.1 - Copied the Debian-Gnome Live ISO to an 8-GB USB.

6 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
6.1 - Attempted install to 8-GB USB (overwrite Debian-Gnome already on it).
6.2 - Install failed!

Had the USB hard drive been used instead of the 8-GB USB and *exactly*
the same install attempted it too would have failed. The nature or size
of the device being installed to is immaterial, as is whether it is a
text mode or GUI install. The only thing that matters is that the device
has previously had an isohybrid ISO written to it.


Actually, that's not true. The hard drive never had an ISO written to it. It 
was unpartitioned.


I even provide a way of seeing how GRUB reacts to being put on a device
which has held an isohybrid ISO. You now have a functioning Debian
machine so could follow the procedure given. I cannot say if it will
involve more or less effort than posting a syslog excerpt. :)

[A largish snip. The content appears to be a distraction from the main
issue]


You have told us as much above. The state of the 8GB drive for the text
mode install is different from its initial state.


I was not using the 8-GB USB flash drive.


The state of the USB hard drive for the text mode install was different
from the state of the 8-GB USB 

Wheezy RC1 - Installing python:i386 on amd64 machine

2013-03-03 Thread nir izraeli
Hi,

I've been trying to install python2.7:i386 on an amd64 machine (i require
it for another piece closed-source software that only has 32 bit support),
and i'm having trouble doing that.

Since im using Wheezy RC1 i'm aware of the possibility that there's no
solution available but i'd like to avoid installing native 32 bit OS
because i need the extra RAM and performance.
Also, debian 6 AFAIK only has python2.6 packages (with which i have
other dependency issues)

I'd like any suggestion i can get...

To make myself clearer i included shell output for what i'm trying to do
and what's the machine's status.

Thanks!

user@vmdeb:~$ su -c apt-get install python2.7:i386
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 python2.7:i386 : Depends: mime-support:i386 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
user@vmdeb:~$ su -c apt-get install mime-support:i386
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package mime-support:i386 is not available, but is referred to by another
package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'mime-support:i386' has no installation candidate
user@vmdeb:~$ uname -a
Linux vmdeb 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
user@vmdeb:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
7.0
user@vmdeb:~$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
user@vmdeb:~$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64


Re: Wheezy RC1 - Installing python:i386 on amd64 machine

2013-03-03 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2013-03-03 22:36 +0100, nir izraeli wrote:

 I've been trying to install python2.7:i386 on an amd64 machine (i require
 it for another piece closed-source software that only has 32 bit support),
 and i'm having trouble doing that.

You cannot really do that, I'm afraid.

 Since im using Wheezy RC1 i'm aware of the possibility that there's no
 solution available but i'd like to avoid installing native 32 bit OS
 because i need the extra RAM and performance.
 Also, debian 6 AFAIK only has python2.6 packages (with which i have
 other dependency issues)

 I'd like any suggestion i can get...

Set up an i386 chroot and install python2.7 and your application there.
The schroot package makes using such a setup relatively painless.

 user@vmdeb:~$ su -c apt-get install python2.7:i386
 Password:
 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information... Done
 Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
 requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
 distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
 or been moved out of Incoming.
 The following information may help to resolve the situation:

 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  python2.7:i386 : Depends: mime-support:i386 but it is not installable
 E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
 user@vmdeb:~$ su -c apt-get install mime-support:i386
 Password:
 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information... Done
 Package mime-support:i386 is not available, but is referred to by another
 package.
 This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
 is only available from another source

 E: Package 'mime-support:i386' has no installation candidate

The problem is that mime-support is an Architecture:all package, but not
marked as Multi-Arch: foreign, so it does not fulfill dependencies of
packages from foreign architectures.  For details, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695357.

With the mime-support package in experimental, you should be
theoretically able to install python2.7:i386, but since that package is
not Multiarch: foreign either, many packages which depend on python2.7
(or just python) become uninstallabe, so this is not really an option.

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87txosdtyv@turtle.gmx.de



Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Sharon Kimble
I'm trying to get a bash script working from a cron job that will empty
trash of all files and directories that are older than $N [7 days in
this case]. This partly works but is very inefficient in that it
doesn't delete everything that is available to be deleted, just tends
to leave stuff with no apparent reasoning.

###
#!/bin/bash
# emptyTrash.sh

DAYS=7 #   retain for N days

for SUBDIR in files info
do
echo Lookin\' in Trash/${SUBDIR}...
find ${HOME}/.local/share/Trash/$SUBDIR  -mtime +${DAYS} -exec rm
-vrf {} \; done


Can anyone help me with getting a better working script please?

Thanks
Sharon.


Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 4:20 PM, Joe wrote:

On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:53:37 -0500
Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com wrote:

-snip-

BTW, before I go on, I already tried opening a file manager (in
Debian+LXDE) and simply double-clicking one of the .deb files.
Nothing happened.


There are packages which will install .deb files in this way, having
set up the right file association, but they are not installed by default
in LXDE. Anyway, the missing link here is that you use dpkg:

dpkg -i full-name-of-.deb-file


May I make a few comments here?
First, Thanks Joe!
Second, I just returned from Debian-land. I discovered Aptitude *was* installed. The reason I 
didn't think it was installed was because it wasn't listed in LXDE's System Tools menu. 
But when I opened a terminal session and typed in aptitude, there it was.
Third, the rest of your very good information is getting snipped, but I promise 
that I will use it.

For now, I need help interpreting what I found in Debian-land.

=
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ su
Password:
root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# aptitude update
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64 
LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56] squeeze Release.gpg
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64 
LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56]/ squeeze/main Translation-en
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64 
LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56]/ squeeze/main Translation-en_US
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64 
LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56] squeeze Release
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64 
LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56] squeeze/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex

root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# aptitude 
install wicd
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched wicd
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched wicd
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# aptitude 
install wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched 
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched 
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages#
=

What I did:
The packages resided in a FAT-32 partition that I prepared in Windows.
I opened the FAT-32 (./media/usb8) in a file browser.
I browsed to the folder that contained the packages (./Setup/Debian 6.0.6 
64-bit/Packages).
From the file browser's menu, I opened a terminal window in the current folder.
My session dialog is above.
I copied the session dialog to a text file and saved it in the FAT-32 partition.
I booted Windows and copied the session dialog into this message.

Questions/comments (in no particular order):
Comment: I submitted 'aptitude update' because it was part of the example I 
followed.
Comment: I submitted 'aptitude install wicd' because it was part of the example 
I followed. Obviously, 'wicd' is not sufficient.
Question: Why didn't 'aptitude install wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb' work?
Question (your response is optional): Why is there a redundant failure line for 
each failure?
Question (your response is optional): Why, following the redundant failure 
line, are 3 additional lines written? This is the sort of behavior that 
confuses people and makes them think that Linux is unfriendly.

Oh, one last thing: 'wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb' is correct and is in 
the correct folder. Why 'aptitude' couldn't find it is a mystery to me.

Thanks  Ciao - Mark.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133d156.5010...@gmail.com



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Sharon Kimble wrote:
 I'm trying to get a bash script working from a cron job that will empty
 trash of all files and directories that are older than $N [7 days in
 this case]. This partly works but is very inefficient in that it
 doesn't delete everything that is available to be deleted, just tends
 to leave stuff with no apparent reasoning.

Very likely you are running into the problem that removing files from
the directory causes the directory to be updated.  Because the
directory is updated it ceases to be old enough to be aged off.  This
leaves them around until they become old enough to be an age candidate
again.

Let's walk through the problem step by step.

 #!/bin/bash

Since there are no bash features I suggest using /bin/sh the standard
shell.  Others would say use bash features. :-)  I like standard
better.  A preference.

 # emptyTrash.sh

The use of a .sh on the end is frowned upon.  Sure it is a shell
script at this instant.  But you actually have a bash script and so it
should be called .bash instead of .sh.  But next week you might want
to convert it to a perl script.  Two weeks after that you might want
to convert it to a python script.  Or Ruby.  Encoding the language in
the extension then gets in the way.  It isn't needed.  If your editor
is a smart one, and most are these days, then it doesn't need the
extension to know how to syntax highlight it.

 for SUBDIR in files info
 do
 echo Lookin\' in Trash/${SUBDIR}...
 find ${HOME}/.local/share/Trash/$SUBDIR  -mtime +${DAYS} -exec rm -vrf {} 
 \; done

Running 'find' and 'for' is inconsistent.  The 'find' command can do
both.  I would have it do both.

The \; part is the classic old legacy way of running find's -exec.
It runs one argument per command.  That is less efficient than running
as many arguments as possible.  The new (ten years old is still new)
way to do this and POSIX standard is using +.  Using + will stack
as many arguments as possible and is very efficient.

Let's start by printing the entries and then work from there.

  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -mtime +$DAYS -print

Files and directories.  I would like to remove only the files first.

  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -print

I would like find to remove them itself.  The -delete option was added
to GNU find some years ago and is available in all current GNU systems.

  # Warning: This fires the -delete option and will delete those files!
  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -delete

The files are gone.  Directories may be left behind.  I would like to
remove the directories as a second pass.

  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type d -print

Looks good.  Let's remove those too.  But I am likely to avoid looking
to see if a directory should be removed and simply try to remove it
and deal with the non-empty errors.  These are not files and were only
created because the files were put there.  No need to look at mtime on
the trash directories.  Just rmdir any empty directory.  Using
rmdir is very safe because it cannot remove files.  The rmdir can
only remove empty directories making it a quite safe command to simply
fling out without looking.  Can only remove directories from the
bottom up so turn on -depth.

  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} +
  ...may have some errors about non-empty directories...

Looking better.  But if a directory is not empty the GNU rmdir command
has an option specifically for it.  Let's ignore only that case.

  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir 
--ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} +

And there we have the components for this type of cleanup the way I
would do them.  (Others would undoubtedly prefer a different way.
There is more than one way to do this.)  And so we are left with these
two commands run one after the other to do the full clean up.

  #!/bin/sh
  # emptyTrash
  DAYS=7 #   retain for N days
  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -delete
  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir 
--ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} +

Hope that helps.
Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 4:34 PM, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
-big snip-

Why do you think you need a special driver?
Please type /sbin/ifconfig -a in your terminal to check whether you have 
wlan0 device or not in the list.


mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ /sbin/ifconfig 
-a
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:18:8b:dc:30:fd
  BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
  Interrupt:18

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:1696 (1.6 KiB)  TX bytes:1696 (1.6 KiB)

pan0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr ba:3e:86:e1:5a:91
  BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1b:77:80:2d:b9
  BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

Well, 00:1b:77:80:2d:b9 is indeed the WiFi's NIC. So why can't I get to the Ethernet, and 
why does everything I see on the Internet (when I'm in Windows of course) say that I must 
obtain an Intel 3945ABG driver because it's non-free? ...Come to me and fall on thy 
knees, and I will set thee free!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133d6e3.2050...@gmail.com



Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mr G
You need the firmware-iwlwifi package.

# dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi

will tell you if the package is installed. It probably wont be on the
install disk as it is the nonfree repository. You may have to adjust
/etc/apt/sources.list depending on how you answered the questions when you
installed.

And lastly I apologize to everyone on the list on behalf of my phone. Now I
have gotten on the computer and find that google has changed their entire
interface for replies and am not sure how this is going to turn out either.


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 2013/3/3 4:20 PM, Joe wrote:

 On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:53:37 -0500
 Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 -snip-

 BTW, before I go on, I already tried opening a file manager (in
 Debian+LXDE) and simply double-clicking one of the .deb files.
 Nothing happened.

  There are packages which will install .deb files in this way, having
 set up the right file association, but they are not installed by default
 in LXDE. Anyway, the missing link here is that you use dpkg:

 dpkg -i full-name-of-.deb-file


 May I make a few comments here?
 First, Thanks Joe!
 Second, I just returned from Debian-land. I discovered Aptitude *was*
 installed. The reason I didn't think it was installed was because it wasn't
 listed in LXDE's System Tools menu. But when I opened a terminal session
 and typed in aptitude, there it was.
 Third, the rest of your very good information is getting snipped, but I
 promise that I will use it.

 For now, I need help interpreting what I found in Debian-land.

 =
 mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ su
 Password:
 root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages#
 aptitude update
 Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64
 LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56] squeeze Release.gpg
 Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64
 LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56]/ squeeze/main Translation-en
 Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64
 LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56]/ squeeze/main Translation-en_US
 Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64
 LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56] squeeze Release
 Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64
 LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20121214-16:56] squeeze/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex

 root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages#
 aptitude install wicd
 Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched wicd
 Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched wicd
 No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

 root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages#
 aptitude install wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.**deb
 Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched
 wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_**all.deb
 Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched
 wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_**all.deb
 No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

 root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages#
 =

 What I did:
 The packages resided in a FAT-32 partition that I prepared in Windows.
 I opened the FAT-32 (./media/usb8) in a file browser.
 I browsed to the folder that contained the packages (./Setup/Debian 6.0.6
 64-bit/Packages).
 From the file browser's menu, I opened a terminal window in the current
 folder.
 My session dialog is above.
 I copied the session dialog to a text file and saved it in the FAT-32
 partition.
 I booted Windows and copied the session dialog into this message.

 Questions/comments (in no particular order):
 Comment: I submitted 'aptitude update' because it was part of the example
 I followed.
 Comment: I submitted 'aptitude install wicd' because it was part of the
 example I followed. Obviously, 'wicd' is not sufficient.
 Question: Why didn't 'aptitude install wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.**deb'
 work?
 Question (your response is optional): Why is there a redundant failure
 line for each failure?
 Question (your response is optional): Why, following the redundant failure
 line, are 3 additional lines written? This is the sort of behavior that
 confuses people and makes them think that Linux is unfriendly.

 Oh, one last thing: 'wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_**all.deb' is correct and
 is in the correct folder. Why 'aptitude' couldn't find it is a mystery to
 me.

 Thanks  Ciao - Mark.




 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to 
 debian-user-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-user-requ...@lists.debian.orgwith
  a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 

Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 03 March 2013 22:40:22 Mark Filipak wrote:
 Comment: I submitted 'aptitude install wicd' because it was part of the
 example I followed. Obviously, 'wicd' is not sufficient.

Why is it obviously not sufficient?  I would have said that it was.  But you 
would need the right repositories and a connection to the net. On my box:

root@Tux-II:/home/lisi# aptitude install wicd
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libnl1{a} libpcsclite1{a} python-glade2{a} python-iniparse{a} 
python-notify{a}
  python-wicd{a} wicd wicd-daemon{a} wicd-gtk{a} wpasupplicant{a}
0 packages upgraded, 10 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 1,180 kB of archives. After unpacking 4,212 kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
Abort.
root@Tux-II:/home/lisi#

As you see, just wicd would be fine.  I aborted because I have no wireless 
on this box and so don't actually want it installed.

 Question: Why 
 didn't 'aptitude install wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb' work?

If you want to install a .deb in that way, you need to use dpkg, as mentioned 
by Joe:

From the directory that the deb is in:
dpkg -i wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb

If it complains that there are missing dependencies, curse, wish you had used 
aptitude, and install them.  Someone else will need to tell you how to manage 
that from a box without internet access.  I, when faced with this problem, 
always temporarily install an old network card so that I have got internet 
access to sort things out.

HTH
Lisi



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303032323.49687.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Sharon Kimble
Thanks for this, and I've tried it out but its still not deleting files, as
I output it to a txt.file which still remain empty.

There is a programme, ported from ubuntu, called 'autotrash' in the repos.
And although I've set it up as per its man page, but its output remains at
zero, and not working.

Maybe I'm going about this from the wrong end?

Sharon.


On 3 March 2013 22:43, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Sharon Kimble wrote:
  I'm trying to get a bash script working from a cron job that will empty
  trash of all files and directories that are older than $N [7 days in
  this case]. This partly works but is very inefficient in that it
  doesn't delete everything that is available to be deleted, just tends
  to leave stuff with no apparent reasoning.

 Very likely you are running into the problem that removing files from
 the directory causes the directory to be updated.  Because the
 directory is updated it ceases to be old enough to be aged off.  This
 leaves them around until they become old enough to be an age candidate
 again.

 Let's walk through the problem step by step.

  #!/bin/bash

 Since there are no bash features I suggest using /bin/sh the standard
 shell.  Others would say use bash features. :-)  I like standard
 better.  A preference.

  # emptyTrash.sh

 The use of a .sh on the end is frowned upon.  Sure it is a shell
 script at this instant.  But you actually have a bash script and so it
 should be called .bash instead of .sh.  But next week you might want
 to convert it to a perl script.  Two weeks after that you might want
 to convert it to a python script.  Or Ruby.  Encoding the language in
 the extension then gets in the way.  It isn't needed.  If your editor
 is a smart one, and most are these days, then it doesn't need the
 extension to know how to syntax highlight it.

  for SUBDIR in files info
  do
  echo Lookin\' in Trash/${SUBDIR}...
  find ${HOME}/.local/share/Trash/$SUBDIR  -mtime +${DAYS} -exec rm
 -vrf {} \; done

 Running 'find' and 'for' is inconsistent.  The 'find' command can do
 both.  I would have it do both.

 The \; part is the classic old legacy way of running find's -exec.
 It runs one argument per command.  That is less efficient than running
 as many arguments as possible.  The new (ten years old is still new)
 way to do this and POSIX standard is using +.  Using + will stack
 as many arguments as possible and is very efficient.

 Let's start by printing the entries and then work from there.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -mtime +$DAYS -print

 Files and directories.  I would like to remove only the files first.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -print

 I would like find to remove them itself.  The -delete option was added
 to GNU find some years ago and is available in all current GNU systems.

   # Warning: This fires the -delete option and will delete those files!
   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -delete

 The files are gone.  Directories may be left behind.  I would like to
 remove the directories as a second pass.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type d -print

 Looks good.  Let's remove those too.  But I am likely to avoid looking
 to see if a directory should be removed and simply try to remove it
 and deal with the non-empty errors.  These are not files and were only
 created because the files were put there.  No need to look at mtime on
 the trash directories.  Just rmdir any empty directory.  Using
 rmdir is very safe because it cannot remove files.  The rmdir can
 only remove empty directories making it a quite safe command to simply
 fling out without looking.  Can only remove directories from the
 bottom up so turn on -depth.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} +
   ...may have some errors about non-empty directories...

 Looking better.  But if a directory is not empty the GNU rmdir command
 has an option specifically for it.  Let's ignore only that case.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir
 --ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} +

 And there we have the components for this type of cleanup the way I
 would do them.  (Others would undoubtedly prefer a different way.
 There is more than one way to do this.)  And so we are left with these
 two commands run one after the other to do the full clean up.

   #!/bin/sh
   # emptyTrash
   DAYS=7 #   retain for N days
   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -delete
   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir
 --ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} +

 Hope that helps.
 Bob




-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
efever = http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
efever = http://sharon04.livejournal.com/
Debian Wheezy, LXDE 2 LibreOffice 3.5.4.2
Registered Linux user 334501


Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Sharon Kimble
I've done some googling, and got it to work using this line 'rm -rf
/home/YOURUSERNAME/.local/share/Trash/files/*' but this just
blanket-empties the trash can without any care for retaining 7
days worth of files.

Sharon.


On 3 March 2013 23:27, Sharon Kimble skimbl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for this, and I've tried it out but its still not deleting files,
 as I output it to a txt.file which still remain empty.

 There is a programme, ported from ubuntu, called 'autotrash' in the repos.
 And although I've set it up as per its man page, but its output remains at
 zero, and not working.

 Maybe I'm going about this from the wrong end?

 Sharon.


 On 3 March 2013 22:43, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Sharon Kimble wrote:
  I'm trying to get a bash script working from a cron job that will empty
  trash of all files and directories that are older than $N [7 days in
  this case]. This partly works but is very inefficient in that it
  doesn't delete everything that is available to be deleted, just tends
  to leave stuff with no apparent reasoning.

 Very likely you are running into the problem that removing files from
 the directory causes the directory to be updated.  Because the
 directory is updated it ceases to be old enough to be aged off.  This
 leaves them around until they become old enough to be an age candidate
 again.

 Let's walk through the problem step by step.

  #!/bin/bash

 Since there are no bash features I suggest using /bin/sh the standard
 shell.  Others would say use bash features. :-)  I like standard
 better.  A preference.

  # emptyTrash.sh

 The use of a .sh on the end is frowned upon.  Sure it is a shell
 script at this instant.  But you actually have a bash script and so it
 should be called .bash instead of .sh.  But next week you might want
 to convert it to a perl script.  Two weeks after that you might want
 to convert it to a python script.  Or Ruby.  Encoding the language in
 the extension then gets in the way.  It isn't needed.  If your editor
 is a smart one, and most are these days, then it doesn't need the
 extension to know how to syntax highlight it.

  for SUBDIR in files info
  do
  echo Lookin\' in Trash/${SUBDIR}...
  find ${HOME}/.local/share/Trash/$SUBDIR  -mtime +${DAYS} -exec rm
 -vrf {} \; done

 Running 'find' and 'for' is inconsistent.  The 'find' command can do
 both.  I would have it do both.

 The \; part is the classic old legacy way of running find's -exec.
 It runs one argument per command.  That is less efficient than running
 as many arguments as possible.  The new (ten years old is still new)
 way to do this and POSIX standard is using +.  Using + will stack
 as many arguments as possible and is very efficient.

 Let's start by printing the entries and then work from there.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -mtime +$DAYS -print

 Files and directories.  I would like to remove only the files first.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -print

 I would like find to remove them itself.  The -delete option was added
 to GNU find some years ago and is available in all current GNU systems.

   # Warning: This fires the -delete option and will delete those files!
   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -delete

 The files are gone.  Directories may be left behind.  I would like to
 remove the directories as a second pass.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type d -print

 Looks good.  Let's remove those too.  But I am likely to avoid looking
 to see if a directory should be removed and simply try to remove it
 and deal with the non-empty errors.  These are not files and were only
 created because the files were put there.  No need to look at mtime on
 the trash directories.  Just rmdir any empty directory.  Using
 rmdir is very safe because it cannot remove files.  The rmdir can
 only remove empty directories making it a quite safe command to simply
 fling out without looking.  Can only remove directories from the
 bottom up so turn on -depth.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} +
   ...may have some errors about non-empty directories...

 Looking better.  But if a directory is not empty the GNU rmdir command
 has an option specifically for it.  Let's ignore only that case.

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir
 --ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} +

 And there we have the components for this type of cleanup the way I
 would do them.  (Others would undoubtedly prefer a different way.
 There is more than one way to do this.)  And so we are left with these
 two commands run one after the other to do the full clean up.

   #!/bin/sh
   # emptyTrash
   DAYS=7 #   retain for N days
   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +$DAYS -delete
   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -depth -type d -exec rmdir
 --ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} +

 Hope that helps.
 Bob




 --
 A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
 efever = 

Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 6:10 PM, Mr G wrote:

You need the firmware-iwlwifi package.

# dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi

will tell you if the package is installed. It probably wont be on the
install disk as it is the nonfree repository. You may have to adjust
/etc/apt/sources.list depending on how you answered the questions when you
installed.


Reminder: I don't have Internet in Debian+LXDE yet.
Comment: I have the iwlwifi package. It's 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb.
Remark: There were no questions when I installed (Thank doG!), so 
/etc/apt/sources.list may not need adjustment.
Question: What is /etc/apt/sources.list?

Ciao - Mark.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133e0fe.4030...@gmail.com



Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 6:10 PM, Mr G wrote:

You need the firmware-iwlwifi package.

# dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi


You mean this one:
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb   // Debian - WiFi Drivers

It's on my list.

Do I really install it with this:

dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi

or this:

dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all

or this:

dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb

?

Oh, never mind. I'll try all 3.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133e132.1020...@gmail.com



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Sharon Kimble wrote:
 Thanks for this, and I've tried it out but its still not deleting files, as
 I output it to a txt.file which still remain empty.

Please say more.  It works for me.  You say it isn't deleting files
for you.  It is possible the permissions will prevent you from
deleting files but in that case there should be errors from the
command.  Please provide an example.

Start with this:

  find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +7

If that prints files then adding the -delete option will delete them.
Honest! :-)

You say it isn't deleting files.  Pick a file that you think it should
delete but isn't deleting.  Show the file and the permissions of the
directory holding that file.  The permissions of the directory is the
important detail about creating or deleting files.

  ls -ld $HOME/.local/share/Trash/files/foo
  ls -ld $HOME/.local/share/Trash/files

I think that there simply are not any files old enough to need to be
aged away.  I think all of the files are current.  Since they are
current they do not meet your +7 days of mtime age that you originally
requested.  A +7 mtime age for trash files seemed reasonable to me.

 There is a programme, ported from ubuntu, called 'autotrash' in the repos.
 And although I've set it up as per its man page, but its output remains at
 zero, and not working.

Probably for the same reason.  Probably because the files are all
current and none of them old enough, past your seven day threshold, to
be candidates to be aged away.

The 'find' command will be easier to debug.  I would use it first to
figure things out.  Understanding a simple command is much better than
not understanding a magical black box.

 Maybe I'm going about this from the wrong end?

You have help here on the mailing list for your problem.  If you make
good use of it then you can understand and solve your task.  There is
no need to give up so easily.  Stick to it! :-)

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 6:48 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/3 6:10 PM, Mr G wrote:

You need the firmware-iwlwifi package.

# dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi


You mean this one:
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb   // Debian - WiFi Drivers

It's on my list.

Do I really install it with this:

dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi

or this:

dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all

or this:

dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb

?

Oh, never mind. I'll try all 3.


I don't quite know what to make of the results, but I did as you asked (I 
think).
=
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -s 
firmware-iwlwifi
Package `firmware-iwlwifi' is not installed and no info is available.
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -s 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all
Package `firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all' is not installed and no info is 
available.
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -s 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb
Package `firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb' is not installed and no info 
is available.
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$
=

Can you suggest anything else?

Ciao - Mark (mystified).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133e4d3.3000...@gmail.com



Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

I tried to install  wicd.

=
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -i 
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb
dpkg: requested operation requires superuser privilege
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ su
Password:
root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# dpkg -i 
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package wicd.
(Reading database ... 68689 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking wicd (from wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wicd:
 wicd depends on wicd-daemon (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3); however:
  Package wicd-daemon is not installed.
 wicd depends on wicd-gtk (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3) | wicd-curses (= 
1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3) | wicd-cli (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3) | wicd-client; 
however:
  Package wicd-gtk is not installed.
  Package wicd-curses is not installed.
  Package wicd-cli is not installed.
  Package wicd-client is not installed.
dpkg: error processing wicd (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 wicd
root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages#
=

I see that there are uninstalled dependencies:
wicd-daemon (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-gtk (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-curses (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-cli (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-client

When I do a google search for 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3 I find lots of stuff, 
including Python - gee, I've written Python server code - is that needed for this?

I don't know what to do, so I'll wait for some nice person to give me a push in 
a particular direction (and hope that it's not towards a cliff).

Ciao - Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133e575.6070...@gmail.com



Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mr G
No, dpkg -s just simply tells you if it is installed.  If it's not then:

$ cd directory where firmware-iwlwifi.deb

is then:

$ sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

or

# dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

There should have been one installed by default. If it is installed then
you can move onto the next step which would be configuring your network.
That works exactly the same as any other desktop. Find the icon and click
or right click and pick your network or adjust settings. I can't remember,
it's been several years since I used a network manager.

Also for future reference, you may want to install the gdebi package or
check your menu to see if it is installed. It will do the same thing as
dpkg -i except it is a graphical program like you are used to and you will
be able to install .deb packages from your file manager by clicking on them
like you are used to using. I find such things to just simply get in my way
but to each their own.


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 2013/3/3 6:10 PM, Mr G wrote:

 You need the firmware-iwlwifi package.

 # dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi


 You mean this one:

 firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all.deb   // Debian - WiFi Drivers

 It's on my list.

 Do I really install it with this:

 dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi

 or this:

 dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all

 or this:

 dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all.deb

 ?

 Oh, never mind. I'll try all 3.




-- 
B G


Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mr G
Good. You found the problem.

 Package `firmware-iwlwifi' is not installed and no info is available.

So now you need to get you and firmware-iwlwifi.deb in the same directory.
Really you don't -- but let's keep it simple ;)

If you don't know how do:

$ man cd

Once you and the package are together then do the

$ sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

as a regular user or:

# dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

as root. Again I don't know how you answered the questions when you
installed. You can type

$ id

and it will tell you what groups you are in. To execute the command as
normal user using sudo
you will need to be in the group named sudo.



On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Mr G persistence2succ...@gmail.com wrote:

 No, dpkg -s just simply tells you if it is installed.  If it's not then:

 $ cd directory where firmware-iwlwifi.deb

 is then:

 $ sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

 or

 # dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

 There should have been one installed by default. If it is installed then
 you can move onto the next step which would be configuring your network.
 That works exactly the same as any other desktop. Find the icon and click
 or right click and pick your network or adjust settings. I can't remember,
 it's been several years since I used a network manager.

 Also for future reference, you may want to install the gdebi package or
 check your menu to see if it is installed. It will do the same thing as
 dpkg -i except it is a graphical program like you are used to and you will
 be able to install .deb packages from your file manager by clicking on them
 like you are used to using. I find such things to just simply get in my way
 but to each their own.


 On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mark Filipak 
 markfilipak.li...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 2013/3/3 6:10 PM, Mr G wrote:

 You need the firmware-iwlwifi package.

 # dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi


 You mean this one:

 firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all.deb   // Debian - WiFi Drivers

 It's on my list.

 Do I really install it with this:

 dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi

 or this:

 dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all

 or this:

 dpkg -s firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all.deb

 ?

 Oh, never mind. I'll try all 3.




 --
 B G




-- 
B G


Re: Latest sid upgrade breaks hot-key suspend-to-ram on T410 - SOLVED

2013-03-03 Thread Joel Roth
Claudius Hubig wrote:
 Dear Joel,
 
 Joel Roth wrote:
  The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
  Fn-F4).
  
  I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
 
 Cool. Does pm-suspend (a wrapper that does some funky things before
 calling s2ram) work, too?

yes, that works, too.

  Any idea against which package I should file a bug?
 
 At least here (T410s), Fn-F4 generates an ACPI event that is then
 handled by an appropriate file in /etc/acpi/events, which in turn
 calls some script to do the actual suspending.
 
 If you have a similarly ‘bare’ setup without other daemons
 (gnome-power-manager etc.), you might want to check there.
 
 Otherwise, you can check /var/log/apt/history.log to see which
 packages were upgraded last or at least give us some more information - 

Good suggestion! I see my upgrade ended in an error.

Correcting a problem package by using 'apt-get -f install packagename'
allowed the upgrade to proceed, fixing my issue.

 Which desktop environment? Are any power managers running? If so,
 which?

I use StumpWM, no power managers (clear execute permissions of cpufreqd) 
 
Thanks for your help :-)

 Best,
 
 Claudius
 -- 
 Please don’t CC me.
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303193841.467ce...@ares.home.chubig.net
 

-- 
Joel Roth


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130304002807.GA7329@sprite



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Sharon Kimble
Thanks, after repopulating .trash with files suitable for deleting, i was
able to test it out. And' find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime
+7' did find one file, which i was then able to delete by running the same
command again with '-delete' at the end.

I now see in .trash that there are two directories, one dated 8th February,
and one dated 16th February which should be eligible for deletion. Except,
if you go by its properties date, it was last accessed 3/3/13, which means
that its not deletable until the 10th. Is that correct please?


On 3 March 2013 23:54, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Sharon Kimble wrote:
  Thanks for this, and I've tried it out but its still not deleting files,
 as
  I output it to a txt.file which still remain empty.

 Please say more.  It works for me.  You say it isn't deleting files
 for you.  It is possible the permissions will prevent you from
 deleting files but in that case there should be errors from the
 command.  Please provide an example.

 Start with this:

   find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime +7

 If that prints files then adding the -delete option will delete them.
 Honest! :-)

 You say it isn't deleting files.  Pick a file that you think it should
 delete but isn't deleting.  Show the file and the permissions of the
 directory holding that file.  The permissions of the directory is the
 important detail about creating or deleting files.

   ls -ld $HOME/.local/share/Trash/files/foo
   ls -ld $HOME/.local/share/Trash/files

 I think that there simply are not any files old enough to need to be
 aged away.  I think all of the files are current.  Since they are
 current they do not meet your +7 days of mtime age that you originally
 requested.  A +7 mtime age for trash files seemed reasonable to me.

  There is a programme, ported from ubuntu, called 'autotrash' in the
 repos.
  And although I've set it up as per its man page, but its output remains
 at
  zero, and not working.

 Probably for the same reason.  Probably because the files are all
 current and none of them old enough, past your seven day threshold, to
 be candidates to be aged away.

 The 'find' command will be easier to debug.  I would use it first to
 figure things out.  Understanding a simple command is much better than
 not understanding a magical black box.

  Maybe I'm going about this from the wrong end?

 You have help here on the mailing list for your problem.  If you make
 good use of it then you can understand and solve your task.  There is
 no need to give up so easily.  Stick to it! :-)

 Bob




-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
efever = http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
efever = http://sharon04.livejournal.com/
Debian Wheezy, LXDE 2 LibreOffice 3.5.4.2
Registered Linux user 334501


Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 7:22 PM, Mr G wrote:

Good. You found the problem.

 Package `firmware-iwlwifi' is not installed and no info is available.

So now you need to get you and firmware-iwlwifi.deb in the same directory.


=
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -s 
firmware-iwlwifi
Package `firmware-iwlwifi' is not installed and no info is available.
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -s 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all
Package `firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all' is not installed and no info is 
available.
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ dpkg -s 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb
Package `firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb' is not installed and no info 
is available.
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$
=

Yes, as you can see from the terminal session above, the CWD is
   'mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages'.
I guess that's really
   '/home/mark/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages'
but I'm not really sure.

-snip-

$ sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

as a regular user or:

# dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi.deb

as root. Again I don't know how you answered the questions when you
installed.


Aside from my name, password, and time zone, the installer didn't ask any 
questions (Thank doG!).
In my previous encounters with Linux, the installer asked a million questions as though I 
knew what the stuff was and disk space was incredibly expensive. I just answered 'Yes' to 
everything, and then I wound up with a non-working system. That's why I wrote I've 
never successfully installed Linux last week. That brought the wrath of the 
Linux-stuffedshirtkingdom down on me and I had to run for the hills.

As you can see from the terminal session above, I was not alerted to run as 
root. When I tried 'Aptitude' a hour or so ago, I was alerted to run as root, 
but this time, no.

I'll go back and try running 'dpkg' as root, but you said that 'dpkg' is not an 
installer, so I'm confused regarding why I'm doing it. I'll be back in a few 
minutes.

Ciao - Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5133f121.2060...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Brian
On Sun 03 Mar 2013 at 18:07:26 -0300, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

 Brian wrote:
 
  Had the USB hard drive been used instead of the 8-GB USB and *exactly*
  the same install attempted it too would have failed. The nature or size
  of the device being installed to is immaterial, as is whether it is a
  text mode or GUI install. The only thing that matters is that the device
  has previously had an isohybrid ISO written to it.
 
 [...]
 
  Write a netinst image to two USB devices. Boot from one device and
  install to the second one. Try text and GUI modes. It's about an hour's
  work at most.
 
 But will this happen even if one formats the partition holding the iso?
 What if the installation proccess is done normally, the target device that
 happens to hold the iso is partitioned and all the partitions are
 formatted? When grub gets to be installed, in the last installation step,
 all the information that an iso existed before is gone, or no?

When the isohybrid ISO is written to to the drive the information about
the iso9660 filesystem is put within the first 65 sectors of the drive.
If fdisk is now used to partition the drive the first partition starts
at sector 2048. Everything beyond this sector is destroyed but sectors
below number 2048 are left intact. The drive is now useless as a device
to boot Debian but information about the iso9660 file system is left
intact.

fdisk leaves space at the beginning of the drive because GRUB requires
it to embed part of itself there. But GRUB will not go there because it
thinks it is overwriting data on the disk when it detects the iso9660
signature. This is by design.

D-I uses partman for partitioning. It too leaves an embedding area which
contains the iso9660 data sector. The solution is to remember to do

   dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX count=65

before partitioning. 

 Anyway, it must be said that you did an impressive investigation with very
 scarce resources to say the least, Brian!

Thanks. I cheated though! I had already encountered the bug some time
ago and the reported behaviour in this thread is very, very similar to
it.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130304010743.GW14686@desktop



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Sharon Kimble wrote:
 Thanks, after repopulating .trash with files suitable for deleting, i was
 able to test it out. And' find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f -mtime
 +7' did find one file, which i was then able to delete by running the same
 command again with '-delete' at the end.

Yay!  :-)

 I now see in .trash that there are two directories, one dated 8th February,
 and one dated 16th February which should be eligible for deletion. 

The top two directories files, and info will always be created and
those will always be new.  If those are the two you see then I would
simply leave those.  It is subdirectories that are more interesting.

 Except, if you go by its properties date, it was last accessed
 3/3/13, which means that its not deletable until the 10th. Is that
 correct please?

You say properties making me think you are using a graphical file
manager.  That's fine.  But often those make things too simple.
Usually they hide too much.  And they make it impossible to concisely
show us what you are seeing.

Instead could you show us the output using shell command line tools?
Open a terminal window and run the commands.  Then cut and paste the
output from the commands back for us to see.  Using 'ls -l' is good.
Or there are other ways such as the find -ls option.  Or 'stat'.  But
'ls -l' is good.

Really when deleting these files the access time is most interesting.
But these days many people turn atime off!  It isn't available then.
If you don't turn it off then atime might be a better choice than
mtime.

When files are put into the trashcan what timestamps (if any) are
updated?  I wonder if a file could be put in the trash and immediately
be a candidate due to having been old before and not modified when it
was put in the trashcan.  That might cause the emptytrash script to
immediately delete it.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Windows XP option not showing up after fresh install.

2013-03-03 Thread Hormatzhan Yiltiz
First, just curious why are you saying Debian 6 as new? It has been
released several years ago.
For your question, you may want to drop to root and run grub-update and
grub-install /dev/sdX where sdX might be /dev/sda in your case.

祝好,

He who is worthy to receive his days and nights is worthy to receive* all
else* from you (and me).
 The Prophet, Gibran Kahlil
Gibran


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Michael jm...@jagmail.southalabama.eduwrote:

 I love the new Debian 6.  I installed and during installation it found
 both the Win XP and the Linux Mint installations.  It then asked if I
 wanted to put GRUB on the MBR or something similar question.  I hit YES and
 installed.  After booting, the Mint shows up but not the XP.  How do get
 the XP option do show up upon boot?

 Michael




 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to 
 debian-user-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-user-requ...@lists.debian.orgwith
  a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/**kh0vnk$l7k$1...@ger.gmane.orghttp://lists.debian.org/kh0vnk$l7k$1...@ger.gmane.org




Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/3 8:16 PM, Mr G wrote:
-snip-

$ id

-snip-

$ sudo updatedb

-snip-

$ mlocate firmware-iwlwfi.deb

-snip-

$ pwd


Look at the terminal session below

=
mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ su
Password:

root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# dpkg -i 
firmware-iwlwifi.deb
dpkg: error processing firmware-iwlwifi.deb (--install):
 cannot access archive: No such file or directory
Errors were encountered while processing:
 firmware-iwlwifi.deb

root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# dpkg -i 
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package firmware-iwlwifi.
(Reading database ... 68697 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking firmware-iwlwifi (from firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb) ...
Setting up firmware-iwlwifi (0.28+squeeze1) ...
=

I don't think it's necessary for me to 'mlocate' or 'pwd', do you?
'firmware-iwlwifi.deb' is not right. It has to be 
'firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb'

This is the first real progress I've made since the installation succeeded. 
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
Now, regarding a network manager, the terminal session below is from about 2 
hours ago. Can you help with it?

=
root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# dpkg -i 
wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package wicd.
(Reading database ... 68689 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking wicd (from wicd_1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3_all.deb) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of wicd:
 wicd depends on wicd-daemon (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3); however:
  Package wicd-daemon is not installed.
 wicd depends on wicd-gtk (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3) | wicd-curses (= 
1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3) | wicd-cli (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3) | wicd-client; 
however:
  Package wicd-gtk is not installed.
  Package wicd-curses is not installed.
  Package wicd-cli is not installed.
  Package wicd-client is not installed.
dpkg: error processing wicd (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 wicd
=

There are uninstalled dependencies:
wicd-daemon (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-gtk (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-curses (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-cli (= 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3)
wicd-client

When I do a google search for 1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze3 I find lots of stuff (too 
much stuff), including Python - gee, I've written Python server code - is that needed for 
this? Python aside, I don't know what to do next, so I'll wait for a push in a particular 
direction (and hope that it's not towards a cliff).

Ciao - Mark (who's going to go out and catch some food for a little while).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51340388.2080...@gmail.com



Re: Windows XP option not showing up after fresh install.

2013-03-03 Thread Johan Grönqvist

2013-03-04 03:08, Michael skrev:

I installed and during installation it found
both the Win XP and the Linux Mint installations.
After booting, the Mint shows up but not the XP. How do
get the XP option do show up upon boot?



As root, run update-grub, then reboot and see if XP is there.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kh1053$mjb$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Sharon Kimble
I'm using 'Dolphin' from KDE as my file manager, that's the only GUI'ness
in usage in this situation! :)

The 'emptytrash' script  is called at 1300 each day from cron, giving
plenty of time to leave stuff in the waste bin for future retrieval.

'atime' is not installed as its not in the wheezy repos, and when i want
to install it apt-get comes back at me saying E: Unable to locate package
atime

You give me the commands and i'll run them. ls-l didn't show  up any
mention of trash/wastebin!

Sharon.


On 4 March 2013 01:37, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Sharon Kimble wrote:
  Thanks, after repopulating .trash with files suitable for deleting, i was
  able to test it out. And' find $HOME/.local/share/Trash -type f
 -mtime
  +7' did find one file, which i was then able to delete by running the
 same
  command again with '-delete' at the end.

 Yay!  :-)

  I now see in .trash that there are two directories, one dated 8th
 February,
  and one dated 16th February which should be eligible for deletion.

 The top two directories files, and info will always be created and
 those will always be new.  If those are the two you see then I would
 simply leave those.  It is subdirectories that are more interesting.

  Except, if you go by its properties date, it was last accessed
  3/3/13, which means that its not deletable until the 10th. Is that
  correct please?

 You say properties making me think you are using a graphical file
 manager.  That's fine.  But often those make things too simple.
 Usually they hide too much.  And they make it impossible to concisely
 show us what you are seeing.

 Instead could you show us the output using shell command line tools?
 Open a terminal window and run the commands.  Then cut and paste the
 output from the commands back for us to see.  Using 'ls -l' is good.
 Or there are other ways such as the find -ls option.  Or 'stat'.  But
 'ls -l' is good.

 Really when deleting these files the access time is most interesting.
 But these days many people turn atime off!  It isn't available then.
 If you don't turn it off then atime might be a better choice than
 mtime.

 When files are put into the trashcan what timestamps (if any) are
 updated?  I wonder if a file could be put in the trash and immediately
 be a candidate due to having been old before and not modified when it
 was put in the trashcan.  That might cause the emptytrash script to
 immediately delete it.

 Bob




-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
efever = http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
efever = http://sharon04.livejournal.com/
Debian Wheezy, LXDE 2 LibreOffice 3.5.4.2
Registered Linux user 334501


Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-03 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
Brian wrote:
 On Sun 03 Mar 2013 at 18:07:26 -0300, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

  Write a netinst image to two USB devices. Boot from one device and
  install to the second one. Try text and GUI modes. It's about an
 hour's
  work at most.

 But will this happen even if one formats the partition holding the iso?
 What if the installation proccess is done normally, the target device
 that
 happens to hold the iso is partitioned and all the partitions are
 formatted? When grub gets to be installed, in the last installation
 step,
 all the information that an iso existed before is gone, or no?

 When the isohybrid ISO is written to to the drive the information about
 the iso9660 filesystem is put within the first 65 sectors of the drive.
 If fdisk is now used to partition the drive the first partition starts
 at sector 2048. Everything beyond this sector is destroyed but sectors
 below number 2048 are left intact. The drive is now useless as a device
 to boot Debian but information about the iso9660 file system is left
 intact.

Wow, of course. The iso image must be installed in the begining of the
disk, which includes the partition table and the mbr, not in the first
partition.

 fdisk leaves space at the beginning of the drive because GRUB requires
 it to embed part of itself there. But GRUB will not go there because it
 thinks it is overwriting data on the disk when it detects the iso9660
 signature. This is by design.

This is clearly a bug, because the disk has a partition table and
therefore there is no useful data before the first partition.

 D-I uses partman for partitioning. It too leaves an embedding area which
 contains the iso9660 data sector. The solution is to remember to do

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX count=65

 before partitioning.

But this will destroy the partition table, which is not right if you have
other operating systems or partitions containing data. Maybe 'grub-install
--force device' would suffice?

 Anyway, it must be said that you did an impressive investigation with
 very
 scarce resources to say the least, Brian!

 Thanks. I cheated though! I had already encountered the bug some time
 ago and the reported behaviour in this thread is very, very similar to
 it.

Of course you deserve congratulations. You had to guess among the various
phony bug reports. It was some kind of psychoanalysis. Your patient still
did not achieve catharsis, though.

João Luis.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/56471eb84fb7089d3745749b71e15ba5.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Package Pre-dependencies

2013-03-03 Thread rbmj

On 03-Mar-13 01:51, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

This seems a fair use case. Note that if the symlink does not exist, a
hierarchy  of directories is created automatically by dpkg to accommodate
the files, and the installation process will not explicitly fail.


It doesn't fail - that's correct.  However, the base package (which is 
an installer for closed-source development files) won't put the symlinks 
in the right place (and *will* fail, since I use the -T option in the 
script), so it will not function as intended.



Therefore, the solution of a package that creates symlinks that serve as
filesystem structure for other packages is not very robust, as symlinks
are easily removable (by administration errors).


Yeah, that's what happens when you try and deal with closed-source 
header files that use brain-damaged directory structure and try and get 
them to play nice with standard build tools


Thanks for your help.  I guess I'll just have to put the requirement for 
a pre-depends somewhere in the documentation :(  It's ugly, but it works.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5134059d.8080...@verizon.net



Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver

2013-03-03 Thread Mr G
root@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/S
etup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages# dpkg -i
firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package firmware-iwlwifi.
(Reading database ... 68697 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking firmware-iwlwifi (from firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb) ...
Setting up firmware-iwlwifi (0.28+squeeze1) ...
=


That means it is installed and this thread is solved. You should now be
able to use the network software that can with the install. If you other
problems, start a new thread. That way other users with your problem will
be able to search the archives.


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Mark Filipak markfilipak.li...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 2013/3/3 9:21 PM, Mr G wrote:

 If I didn't think it was necessary I wouldn't have asked you to run the
 commands.


 Quite right. My error. For convenience, I've added blank lines between
 commands and I added one command.

 =
 mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ id
 uid=1000(mark) gid=1000(mark) groups=1000(mark),24(cdrom),**
 25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),**44(video),46(plugdev),108(**
 netdev),115(powerdev),116(**scanner),119(bluetooth)

 mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ sudo
 updatedb
 [sudo] password for mark:
 mark is not in the sudoers file.  This incident will be reported.

 mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$
 mlocate firmware-iwlwifi.deb

 mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$
 mlocate firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+**squeeze1_all.deb

 mark@MarkFilipak:/media/usb8/**Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages$ pwd
 /media/usb8/Setup/Debian 6.0.6 64-bit/Packages
 =

 Is this what you expected?

 Ciao - Mark.




-- 
B G


Re: BSD more secure? was: Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-03 Thread Miles Fidelman

Morel Bérenger wrote:

Le Sam 2 mars 2013 4:44, Miles Fidelman a écrit :

Yaro Kasear wrote:


I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
(Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point
to the concept of having a hardened base available, whihc Debian
doesn't really offer.) Debian's known for being incredibly STABLE and
high quality, and embraces FOSS standards pretty well.

But unless Debian is bundling an alternate base system built around
stuff like Tomoyo, GrSecurity, PaX, or SELinux and starts loading up
their packages with hardened patchsets I wouldn't boast about it being a
security-focused distro.


The backports are an excellent thing. And the Debian security team
does an excellent job. Lets just be realistic and a little more honest
and say Debian is one of the most secure but I can't call it THE most
secure unless the system can go hardened readily.


Good point.  And when you start talking security to the point of serious
testing and configuration control, I believe there are very few
distributions that are on the DoD approved product list.

On the BSD side, OpenBSD (despite the name), focuses on security, and
has a pretty good reputation for being pretty secure.

Miles Fidelman

I'm a newbie about kernels, but I have read (and maybe misunderstood)
which stated the bsd kernel was more secure. So, if you use the kfreebsd
kernel on a Debian, is it closer to that hardened security?
It is a real question, sorry for the OT, but I am just taking the occasion
to learn a bit about differences between those kernels.



can't really talk to that, sorry - maybe someone else can

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51342267.8000...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Auto-emptying of trash.

2013-03-03 Thread Alois Mahdal
Hello Sharon, bob and everyone!

On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 02:29:09 +
Sharon Kimble skimbl...@gmail.com wrote:
 [...] 
 'atime' is not installed as its not in the wheezy repos, and
 when i want to install it apt-get comes back at me saying E:
 Unable to locate package atime

That is expected.  atime is not a package.  atime (UNIX-ish
short for access time) is property of files/directories that
your filesystem takes care of any time a file is accessed--it
updates this field anytime the file is accessed.

You can review atime, mtime and ctime (change time) using
mentioned `stat` command:

me@here:~$ stat myfile.txt 
  File: `myfile.txt'
  Size: 6   Blocks: 8  IO Block: 4096
regular file
Device: 805h/2053d  Inode: 285632  Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: ( 1000/ me)   Gid:
( 1000/me)
Access: 2013-03-04 04:47:02.929754566 +0100
Modify: 2013-03-04 04:46:22.457204523 +0100
Change: 2013-03-04 04:46:22.457204523 +0100
 Birth: -
me@here:~$

However, there is at least one common exception to this
anytime.  As you might know, in UNIX, file system tree is
very often composed of multiple partitions (e.g. different
for /home than for /usr or for /var), often using different
settings on how exactly kernel behaves to them.  One common
option is to tell kernel that for particular filesystem (or
partition, if you prefer), you prefer *not* to have this
atime update done.  (Typically people do that for performance
reasons, e.g. on partitions that are designated for files for
which this information is not important.)

One way of knowing if this option is on (not sure if the most
reliable way) is running `mount` command which, if run without
arguments, shows where each filesystem is currently mounted to
which folder and which options are active.  You want to look
for noatime option:

me@here:~$ mount # shortened for readability
[...]
/dev/disk/by-uuid/f82f7997-1779-4bff-9f06-912e0019b79b on / type ext4
(rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered)
tmpfs on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=5120k)
tmpfs on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=2049720k)
/dev/sda9 on /var type ext4 
(rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered)
/dev/sda5 on /home type ext4 
(rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered)
/dev/sda7 on /mnt/pub type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,...)
[...]
me@here:~$

Notice the last two lines.  Partition /dev/sda5 is mounted
as /home does not have atime turned off (or noatime turned
on :)) Partition /dev/sda7, which I use as /mnt/pub *does* have
it (for whatever reason I had in mind when setting this up).

(For sake of correctness:  I was using terms partition and
filesystem kind of interchangeably.  It is not the same,
filesystem is not partition, it's something that lives on the
partition.)


 You give me the commands and i'll run them.

I do not recommend running any command without understanding it
first! :)

`rm -rf` yo mentioned in other post is *particularly* dangerous.
One typo and you could irreversibly screw up a LOT in no time!
(Remember that there's no such thing as undelete on
Linux/UNIX.)


 ls-l didn't show up any mention of trash/wastebin!

(It's typo, right? (I mean, it's `ls -l`).)

Without saying at least *where* (in what dir) you ran the
command, it is impossible to know whether the output is as
expected.  If you simply open your terminal, your shell starts
in $HOME, and since Trash is not in that folder, `ls -l` will
not mention it.  Correct.


Thanks,
aL.

-- 
Alois Mahdal


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130304055106.2612d...@hugo.daonet.home




Re: Help please - install the WiFi driver [SOLVED]

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Filipak

Get the WiFi driver.
- Go to http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi and look for a link related to your WiFi 
device.
  My WiFi device is an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945 and the link is labeled 
'ipw3945'.
  Yours will probably be different.
- Taking the device-related link takes you to the Debian Wiki page for your 
desired
  driver. For the ipw3945 that page is http://wiki.debian.org/ipw3945.
  On that page is a notice: Non-free firmware is required, which can be 
provided
   by the link package.
- If you encounter such a notice, take link to get to a search results page
  (identifiable by the phrase Exact hits) and select yet one more link for the
  codename of your Debian (in my case, this codename is Squeeze).
- The final page contains the download link for the driver. Save the driver to a
  folder where it will be available while running Debian. In my case, the 
driver is
  named firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb.

Install the WiFi driver.
- In the target Debian system, browse to the folder where you saved the driver.
- Open a terminal window and enter this command:
 su
  Note: you will be prompted for the root user's password - the installer needs 
to
  run with root privilege and this is how to elevate your privilege to root 
level.
- Then enter this command:
 dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb
  Note: replace firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb with the actual name of
  your driver. If the system responds with something like this:
 Selecting previously deselected package firmware-iwlwifi.
 (Reading database ... 68697 files and directories currently installed.)
 Unpacking firmware-iwlwifi (from firmware-iwlwifi_0.28+squeeze1_all.deb) 
...
 Setting up firmware-iwlwifi (0.28+squeeze1) ...
  your driver is installed.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51342db9.90...@gmail.com



Re: Converting a running system to a VirtualBox VM

2013-03-03 Thread Marc Shapiro

On 03/03/2013 06:10 AM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:

2013-03-03 08:56, Marc Shapiro skrev:

So, does anyone know of a way to convert my current system to a
Virtualbox VM? Or would it be better to just create a new machine and
install from scratch? Getting Citrix Receiver running properly always
seems to be a hassle, so I thought that converting my current system
might be easier. Any suggestions?




http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch08.html#idp0176

I _think_ you _might_ want to try booting to a live-cd, and run 
something like


VBoxManage convertfromraw /dev/sda/ vboximage.vdi

Then try to boot the vboximage.vdi disk in vbox.

When I used it, I did roughly:

dd if=/dev/sda of=diskimage.dd
VBoxManage convertfromraw diskimage.dd vboximage.vdi

I have only tried it once, but it worked much better than I had 
expected (yes, I was more pessimistic than I should have been).
This looks promising.  I will give it a try.  Since I have already 
installed Wheezy in a separate partition I should be able to boot to 
Wheezy and then create the .vdi from the Squeeze partition, instead of 
using a live CD.  Now I just have to get the other two people using this 
computed to save and close active files so that I CAN reboot.  That may 
take a while, but I will report back when I get a chance to try this.


Marc


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513433a8.8090...@gmail.com



Re: RAID1 all bootable

2013-03-03 Thread Francesco Pietra
Hi Bob:
Thanks so much for this manual. Unfortunately, I have no more the
initial situation (one HD replaced) because I was hurried by an editor
to provide computational data from my CUDA server. I did not want to
run the server before all my data were backed up. Therefore I did a
fresh amd64 wheezy install on both disks, the old one and the newly
replaced. The installation ended with:

grub-install /dev/sda

update grub

 Now the situation is (and the same on the server, which has only much
larger HDs, and a different balance for opt for the compiled
computational codes, non-deb):

francesco@..:~$ df -h
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs938M  170M  720M  20% /
udev   10M 0   10M   0% /dev
tmpfs 807M  628K  807M   1% /run
/dev/mapper/vg1-root  938M  170M  720M  20% /
tmpfs 5.0M 0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
tmpfs 1.6G  148K  1.6G   1% /run/shm
/dev/md0  176M   19M  148M  11% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg1-home  395G  283G   92G  76% /home
/dev/mapper/vg1-opt   9.2G  1.1G  7.7G  13% /opt
/dev/mapper/vg1-tmp   2.8G   69M  2.6G   3% /tmp
/dev/mapper/vg1-usr28G  3.3G   23G  13% /usr
/dev/mapper/vg1-var   9.2G  468M  8.3G   6% /var


Nonetheless, I'll try to digest your manual. At this point, could
you also describe how to safely proceed, on this situation, to have
grub on both disks? It would be useful community wide, to complete the
raid1 installation from the Debian installer. (on the above situation
I commanded grub-install /dev/sdb, whereby, at next boot, grub was
no more found, and the system entered grub rescue, from where I
restored the situation of grub on sda only.

Thanks and kind regards
francesco


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
 Hi Francesco,

 As far as I can determine reading this thread you have had a RAID1
 with two disks sda and sdb.  The disk sda failed.  But grub was only
 installed on the failed sda.  The disk sdb contains a mirror of
 everything but does not boot.

 Earlier in the thread Lennart gave an excellent suggestion:

 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
 You can boot the install disk in rescue mode, select the root
 partition to chroot into, then run grub-install from there.

 When grub asks where to install, you should configure it for both sda
 and sdb.  I think 'dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc' is where that is
 selected.  Might need it to use -plow to asks all levels of questions.
 Not sure.

 +1 for this suggestion.  This is definitely the way to go to fix your
 problem.

 Francesco Pietra wrote:
 In my case, with the sda that contained grub loader replaced by a new
 disk, the rescue mode  (using the same CD installer for amd64 wheezy)
 did not find any partition. Inverting the SATA cables, same result.

 No partitions at all?  That is scary.  And I find it to be hard to
 believe.  No partitions would mean that the data from your disks were
 zeroed out.  Perhaps you were mistaken?  Please try it again.

 In both cases (I mean position of SATA cables) I went to the shell in
 the installer environment:

 Don't work from the installer environment.  Work from the target
 environment.  That is a critical difference!

 #fisk /dev/sda (or sdb)

 fisk?  That command does not exist in the installer environment.
 You must have been elsewhere.

  device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, etc
 (expected for a raid)

 Try 'cat /proc/partitions' for a simple safe read-only start.

 #dmesg |grep -i sd
  sda (and sbb): unknown partition table (expected for a raid), however
 md: raid0
 md: raid1
 were identified, along with rai4, 5, 6 etc (unfortunately | less
 does not work to see the whole message).

 Am I using the Rescue Mode improperly? I was unable to dig into the HD
 that contains md0 (booth loader, EXT2) and md1 ( LVM partitions home
 tmp usr opt var swap EXT3)

 I believe you are using rescue mode improperly.  I have written about
 how to use rescue mode several times recently.  Here is one posting:

   http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/01/msg00218.html

 Here is the official documentation for it:

   http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch08s07.html.en

 But that is fairly terse.  Let me say that the rescue mode looks just
 like the install mode initially.  It will ask you keyboard and locale
 questions and you might wonder if you are rescuing or installing!  But
 it will have Rescue in the upper left corner so that you can tell
 that you are not in install mode and be assured.  Get the tool set up
 with keyboard, locale, timezone, and similar and eventually it will
 give you a menu with a list of actions.  Here is a quick run-through.

   Advanced options...
   Rescue mode
   keyboard dialog
   ...starts networking...
   hostname dialog
   domainname dialog
   ...apt update release files...
   ...loading additional components, Retrieving udebs...
   ...detecting disks...

 Then eventually it will get to a menu