Re: Desmontar carpetas muertas

2016-07-18 Thread Paynalton 

-- 

 _
/ La vida no es más que un tejido de  \
| habitos.|
| |
| -- Henry F. Amiel. (1821-1881) Escritor |
\ suizo.  /
 -
\   ^__^
 \  (oo)\___
(__)\   )\/\
||w |
|| ||
 __
< Mi extensión es 1424 >
 --
   \
\
.--.
   |o_o |
   |:_/ |
  //   \ \
 (| | )
/'\_   _/`\
\___)=(___/



El mié, 13-07-2016 a las 13:18 +, Camaleón escribió:
> El Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:00:20 -0500, Paynalton escribió:
> 
> > El mar, 12-07-2016 a las 17:18 +, Camaleón escribió:
> 
> (...)
> 
> >> Si has probado con "umount -f -a -t cifs -l" y tampoco lo desengancha
> >> entonces dinos qué te mensaje te devuelve ("resource busy?").
> >> 
> >> 
> > Pues en realidad no muestra nada, sólo se queda colgado el comando, no
> > vuelve a mostrar el prompt y no responce a CTRL+C ni CTRL+Z, lo mismo
> > pasa si ejecuto lsof, se queda colgado el comando. No he revisado que
> > sale en /proc/mounts, lo probaré.
> 

Acaba de suceder de nuevo, he revisado en /proc/mounts y el recurso
aparece como montado, el proceso umount en D y todo comando que
intervenga con la carpeta se queda colgado.

> Quizá no se cuelgue sino que necesita más tiempo.
> 
> > En psaux y top me aparecen todos los comandos como ejecutándose, pero no
> > puedo matarlos con signal 9 ni 15.
> 
> Sí, eso es normal (man umount.cifs, apartado "bugs") pero lo que conviene 
> saber es si realmente se ha desmontado el recurso o no.
> 
> >> También puedes ver si hay algún proceso con acceso a ese recurso con
> >> "lsof | grep /mnt/carpeta", quizá te dé alguna pista. También te puede
> >> servir el contenido de "/proc/mounts" para ver si sigue apareciendo ese
> >> recurso como "montado". De todas formas si el recurso de red no está
> >> realmente disponible ¿qué es lo que quieres hacer exactamente?
> >> 
> > Pues es que el recurso se va pero vuelve a regresar, Cuando entro al
> > servidor a revisar el recurso está disponible pero los comandos sobre la
> > carpeta se cuelgan, y si llamo al encargado del recurso me dice "A sí,
> > esque otra vez se trabó el windows y lo tuvimos que reiniciar, pero ya
> > ta trabajando" (lease con tono de voz de albañil al que le preguntas
> > porqué le quedó inclinada la pared).
> 
> Bueno, es normal que un recurso de red deje de estar disponible de manera 
> intermitente, samba debería poder lidiar con eso. Pero vaya, que no 
> necesitas desmontar el recurso sólo esperar a que vuelva a estar 
> disponible.
> 

Bueno, ese es uno de los problemas, El recurso se va pero cuando vuelve
a estar disponible el punto de montaje tiene ese problema. Lo único que
puedo hacer hasta este momento es hacer un hard reset del servidor con
los consecuentes peligros que esto conlleva. Por eso es que busco una
manera de poder tener el recurso de nuevo en línea sin necesidad de
desconectar ningún cable.

> >> Por cierto, /mnt no lo recomendaría para montajes fijos, mira a ver si
> >> puedes moverlo a tu /home o a un directorio dedicado.
> >> 
> > Obviamente es un ejemplo, las carpetas montadas están separadas por
> > nombre de compañía en un directorio de trabajo.
> 
> Ah, vale. es que /mnt puede estar ocupado por otro proceso, de ahí que no 
> me guste nada usarlo como punto de montaje fijo, mejor temporal para 
> montajes rápidos, pruebas, etc...
> 
> Saludos,
>

Re: does anybody remember which debian release was it that asked for the MAC ID details at the end ?

2016-07-18 Thread Geert Stappers 
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:08:47PM +, shirish ??? wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Does anybody remember which release of Debian was it that had the bug
> where d-i used to ask for MAC ID details during the end phase
> (networking phase) to the user and if s/he didn't know the MAC ID
> details the installation couldn't move further (unless one knew some
> tricks).
> 
> I know for a fact that it was fixed in squeeze but it was in one of
> the releases before. From the Wikipedia page it becomes clear that d-i
> was introduced in Sarge in June 2005 so it has to be between 2005 and
> 2011.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Debian_releases#Debian_3.1_.28Sarge.29
> 
> Does anybody know which release had that bug ?

Not me.
And I think there was never such bug as asking for MAC details from the User.

In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=295888 is
an user request asking _showing_ MAC address. Quoting the BR:

|  Primary network interface:
|  eth0: BROADCOM Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet
|  eth1: BROADCOM Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet
|
|  The user has no chance to select the right network interface.
|  At least the MAC address should be displayed.


The installation would continue without tricks
just by picking an I/F.


> I am in midst of making a presentation hence need that historical
> information for accuracy.

Was there ever the bug as the original poster described?


> Look forward to know.

Let us, the mailinglist, known.


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

Re: does anybody remember which debian release was it that asked for the MAC ID details at the end ?

2016-07-18 Thread Stephen Powell 
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 18:08, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Does anybody remember which release of Debian was it that had the bug
> where d-i used to ask for MAC ID details during the end phase
> (networking phase) to the user and if s/he didn't know the MAC ID
> details the installation couldn't move further (unless one knew some
> tricks).
> 
> I know for a fact that it was fixed in squeeze but it was in one of
> the releases before. From the Wikipedia page it becomes clear that d-i
> was introduced in Sarge in June 2005 so it has to be between 2005 and
> 2011.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Debian_releases#Debian_3.1_.28Sarge.29
> 
> Does anybody know which release had that bug ?
> 
> I am in midst of making a presentation hence need that historical
> information for accuracy.
> 
> Look forward to know.

I think I have used all Debian releases between Sarge and Stretch, and I
don't remember any such bug.  Then again, I didn't necessarily *install*
all those releases.  There may have been some releases where I only did
an upgrade.  Furthermore, I usually only use a stable installer.  A bug
in the testing release of the installer that was fixed before it became the
stable installer is not likely one that I would have encountered.

Sorry I can't be more helpful.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-

does anybody remember which debian release was it that asked for the MAC ID details at the end ?

2016-07-18 Thread shirish शिरीष 
Hi all,

Does anybody remember which release of Debian was it that had the bug
where d-i used to ask for MAC ID details during the end phase
(networking phase) to the user and if s/he didn't know the MAC ID
details the installation couldn't move further (unless one knew some
tricks).

I know for a fact that it was fixed in squeeze but it was in one of
the releases before. From the Wikipedia page it becomes clear that d-i
was introduced in Sarge in June 2005 so it has to be between 2005 and
2011.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Debian_releases#Debian_3.1_.28Sarge.29

Does anybody know which release had that bug ?

I am in midst of making a presentation hence need that historical
information for accuracy.

Look forward to know.
-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

[OT] Firefox 45: Adblock or uBlock origin filters

2016-07-18 Thread Ldten K 
Hi,

Am struggling with what should be a very simple task: defining a uBlock Origin 
filter that would block all URLs that contain "q;_ylt" (without quotes). Tried 
a number of options but none seems to be working working.

Any ideas? Thanks

Firefox 45.2.0 on wheezy

Re: How to blocks clients between them in subnet

2016-07-18 Thread Andy Smith 
Hi Pol,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
> 
> I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
> 
> So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in
> 192.168.2.0/24. And so for all clients.

I'm having difficulty visualising what you're asking. Depending on
what the IP address of client1 is it could be a very different
question. You say "client1 […] can't see other clients in
192.168.2.0/24" so I will have to assume that client1 is also in
192.168.2.0/24. But then it isn't clear why you mention the other
192.168.1.0/24 network at all.

Anyway, if your problem is that you have multiple hosts in the
same layer 3 network (192.168.1.0/24) but you don't want them to
talk to each other: Presumably they are all connected to the same
switch(es), which may have layer 3 firewalling capabilities, but
these will be of no use since they won't see the layer 3 traffic
like a router does.

In an ideal world you'd use VLANs and have the different switch
ports in different networks. Note that just putting hosts in
different networks won't be enough; it would stop them talking to
devices outside their network by default, but they could just add a
static route themselves.

Your switch may have layer 2 firewalling capabilities. If your
switch is actually a Linux box then it certainly does have layer 2
firewalling; this is provided by a thing called ebtables.

After you've put all interfaces of your switch in a software bridge
it can be as simple as:

# ebtables -P FORWARD DROP

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

Update Your Icloud

2016-07-18 Thread Apple Team 
 - This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -

Dear
Member
Your Icloud might be shutdown within 24hrs due to your recent termination 
request. To cancel,

CONFIRM-NOW

Login and wait response from AppleTeam.

Yours Sincerely,
Apple Team

click con el botón derecho y me aparece el menú contextual negro!

2016-07-18 Thread judedi sago 
Una pequeña molestia aparece algún rato después de estar normal:
Hago click con el botón derecho y me aparece el menú contextual,
 no sale normal, sino que me sale negro y tengo que reiniciar la sesión
para que vuelva a la normalidad, pero vuelve a suceder...
que estará mal configurado?

Re: How to blocks clients between them in subnet

2016-07-18 Thread David Wright 
On Mon 18 Jul 2016 at 16:37:25 (-0300), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > This looks to be impossible. The whole idea of having 1 network
> > segment is that members can communicate directly over layer 2 without
> > ant router/firewall in between.
> 
> Actually, it is very much possible, but it needs cooperation from the
> network equipment (switch or wireless AP/router).
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_VLAN
> 
> Wireless APs and routers often have a feature that can be enabled to
> "isolate clients" which is similar to a private vlan where all ports are
> private except for the uplink.

Is this what home routers do if you configure the Guest Network option?
I see the checkboxes:
. Enable Guest Network ☐
. Enable Wireless Isolation ☐
. Enable SSID Broadcast ☑
. Allow guests to access My Local Network ☐
on my Netgear router screens.
Or would the guests still be able to see each other (but not the
non-guest users like me)?

Cheers,
David.

Re: connaitre l'arborescence d'un paquet

2016-07-18 Thread Olivier Bitsch 
Pour les paquets officiels Debian, il est possible d'aller voir directement
sur leur site:

Par exemple:
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/arm64/libreoffice-writer/filelist

Pour chercher un paquet, aller sur cette page :
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

Puis tapez le nom du paquet en bas dans la recherche. Une fois le paquet
sélectionner, cliquez sur liste des fichiers devant l'architecture désirée.

2016-07-17 22:51 GMT+02:00 honeyshell :

> And the winner is ;-)
>
> Mince Pas d'anglais ici.
>

Convite para ouvir nossa transmissão experimental

2016-07-18 Thread Marco 

Seu cliente de e-mail não pode ler este e-mail.
Para visualizá-lo on-line, por favor, clique aqui:
http://app4.lalasernews.com.br?wid=MKbi6b8ec8xCKaiage8bddbJdiiacdcebiaci6bb8adebxSKba6bxzK68bxNK6bg


Para parar de receber nossos E-mails:
http://app4.lalasernews.com.br?uid=TT0yOTYyODUzOCZDPTE5MTdlODI0NGIwNDk5MTNkM2UyOWFjOTZiMjhhNGViJkw9NjgyJk49MjE2Mg==

Re: Compartir wifi mediante un AP wifi...

2016-07-18 Thread luisededios 

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:39:28 -0400, Camaleón  wrote:


El Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:32:54 -0400, luisededios escribió:


Hola,

Aun sigo sin terminar del armar mi sistema, es decir, según el bosquejo
de Javier


Bueno, entonces imagino una red así:

Internet   laptop otros Wifi --->wlan0 - wlan1
--->  otros


# The loopback network interface auto lo eth0 wlan0 iface lo inet
loopback

# The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp

# INTERNET allow-hotplug wlan0 iface wlan0 inet dhcp

# WIFI AP auto br0 iface br0 inet dhcp bridge-ports wlan0 wlan0:0

donde wlan0 es una interfaz física y wlan1 es virtual,


(...)

¿De dónde has sacado la idea de que "wlan1" es una interfaz "virtual"?


Bueno, como soy humano me equivoqué, quise decir wlan0:0, pero si sigues  
leyendo verás wlan0:0


Mira, ya no tengo qué hacer, ni dónde buscar, y lo que me falta para poner  
a punto el sistema es solo eso, cómo crear la interfaz virtual y cómo  
unirla a wlan0 en un puente. He buscado info sobre esto pero no he  
encontrado nada que valga la pena.


Conoces algún documento que me explique esto? Me echas una mano?  :)

--
Saludos,
Luis

Re: How to blocks clients between them in subnet

2016-07-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh 
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> This looks to be impossible. The whole idea of having 1 network
> segment is that members can communicate directly over layer 2 without
> ant router/firewall in between.

Actually, it is very much possible, but it needs cooperation from the
network equipment (switch or wireless AP/router).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_VLAN

Wireless APs and routers often have a feature that can be enabled to
"isolate clients" which is similar to a private vlan where all ports are
private except for the uplink.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Debian on Tablet

2016-07-18 Thread elementar 
Ola pessoal, meu nome é rodrigo e só gostaria de saber se alguem já teve e
resolveu um problema como o abaixo descrito.

Comprei um Tablet com Android e windows10, formatei facilmente com Debian
Stretch multarq (i386 - amd64), instalei o testing porque o kernel é mais
novo assim  muitas das falhas com relação ao baytrail da intel já foram
solucionadas, no caso o Tablet é z3736f - chuwi hi8, mas o problema é o
seguinte não consigo dar shutdown nem reboot, o interessante é que quando
termino a instalação o Debian via pen drive ele reinicia o Tablet
corretamente porem via Debian instalado no Tablet não, só fica a mensagem:
watchdog did not stop e echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs

Será que alguém aqui já passou por isso?

Obrigado pela atenção.

Re: Prioridade - Saída - Link

2016-07-18 Thread paulo bruck 
Só com iptables não tem.. vc tem que usar roteamento avancado...dê uma
olhada no link abaixo

http://lartc.org/

[]s

Em 18 de julho de 2016 13:34, Christian Rosa 
escreveu:

> Bom dia pessoal,
> Tenho 3 links em um firewall,  2 APs na rede via switch. Gostaria de
> definir a prioridade de 1 dos links para esses 2 APs, tem como fazer isso
> via Iptables ?
>
> --
> Cordialmente,
>
>_Christian Rosa -
>   °v°   Porto Alegre - RS - BRASIL
>  /(_)\  (51) 92281059
>   ^ ^   MSN/SKYPE - rosa_christ...@hotmail.com
>  Linkedin - http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-rosa/3a/59b/543
>
> Seja Livre, use GNU/LINUX !
>
> “Se eu tivesse oito horas para derrubar uma árvore, eu passaria as
> primeiras seis delas afiando meu machado.” - Abraham Lincoln
>



-- 
Paulo Ricardo Bruck consultor
tel 011 3596-4881/4882  011 98140-9184 (TIM)
http://www.contatogs.com.br
http://www.protejasuarede.com.br
gpg AAA59989 at wwwkeys.us.pgp.net

Re: How to blocks clients between them in subnet

2016-07-18 Thread rhkramer 
On Monday, July 18, 2016 10:11:24 AM Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
> 
> Ok, 2 different network segment and something between that might stop
> unwanted communication
> 
> > I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
> > 
> > So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in
> > 192.168.2.0/24. And so for all clients.
> 
> This looks to be impossible. The whole idea of having 1 network segment is
> that members can communicate directly over layer 2 without ant
> router/firewall in between.

I don't fool with my network that often, but, if you have less than ~252 
clients, I think you could put each on its own network (e.g., 192.168.2.1,  
192.168.3.1,  192.168.4.1, ... 192.168.254.1).

Prioridade - Saída - Link

2016-07-18 Thread Christian Rosa 
Bom dia pessoal,
Tenho 3 links em um firewall,  2 APs na rede via switch. Gostaria de
definir a prioridade de 1 dos links para esses 2 APs, tem como fazer isso
via Iptables ?

-- 
Cordialmente,

   _Christian Rosa -
  °v°   Porto Alegre - RS - BRASIL
 /(_)\  (51) 92281059
  ^ ^   MSN/SKYPE - rosa_christ...@hotmail.com
 Linkedin - http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-rosa/3a/59b/543

Seja Livre, use GNU/LINUX !

“Se eu tivesse oito horas para derrubar uma árvore, eu passaria as
primeiras seis delas afiando meu machado.” - Abraham Lincoln

Re: Compartir wifi mediante un AP wifi...

2016-07-18 Thread Camaleón 
El Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:32:54 -0400, luisededios escribió:

> Hola,
> 
> Aun sigo sin terminar del armar mi sistema, es decir, según el bosquejo
> de Javier
> 
>>> Bueno, entonces imagino una red así:
>>>
>>> Internet   laptop otros Wifi --->wlan0 - wlan1 
>>> --->  otros
> 
> # The loopback network interface auto lo eth0 wlan0 iface lo inet
> loopback
> 
> # The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp
> 
> # INTERNET allow-hotplug wlan0 iface wlan0 inet dhcp
> 
> # WIFI AP auto br0 iface br0 inet dhcp bridge-ports wlan0 wlan0:0
> 
> donde wlan0 es una interfaz física y wlan1 es virtual, 

(...)

¿De dónde has sacado la idea de que "wlan1" es una interfaz "virtual"?

Saludos,

-- 
Camaleón

RE: How to blocks clients between them in subnet

2016-07-18 Thread Bonno Bloksma 
Hi,

> I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
Ok, 2 different network segment and something between that might stop unwanted 
communication

> I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
> 
> So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in 
> 192.168.2.0/24. And so for all clients.

This looks to be impossible. The whole idea of having 1 network segment is that 
members can communicate directly over layer 2 without ant router/firewall in 
between.

Bonno Bloksma

Re: Fwd: Duvida -- Proxy Transparente protocolo https

2016-07-18 Thread Flavio Menezes dos Reis 
Rodrigo,

Até onde eu sei, com https o tráfego é criptografado de ponta a ponta,
então, se o squid não estiver explicitamente configurado para
man-in-the-middle, ele só repassa o tráfego criptografado do servidor web
para o cliente e vice-versa, sendo a decriptografia feita com quem possuem
as chaves, ou seja, os mesmos cliente e servidor web.

Em 18 de julho de 2016 07:50, Marcos Carraro 
escreveu:

> Bom Dia,
>
> Se ficar com um sniffer no proxy até consegue algumas informações...
>
>
>
> *--*
> Att
> Marcos Carraro 
>
>
> Em 17 de julho de 2016 22:08, Flávio  escreveu:
>
>> Esse procedimento não quebra alguma norma estabelecida nas RFC´s?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Em 17/07/2016 19:22, lucas castro escreveu:
>>
>> Na hora de importar na chave no navegador você pode marca a chave para
>> confiar apenas para identificar chaves. Nunca fiz sniff para testar isso.
>> Também tem a opção de apenas fazer túnel para algumas algumas conexões que
>> o recomendo para sites como os de bancos.
>>
>> Em 16 de jul de 2016 5:09 PM, "Rodrigo Cunha" 
>> escreveu:
>>
>>>
>>> -- Mensagem encaminhada --
>>> De: Rodrigo Cunha 
>>> Data: 16 de julho de 2016 00:07
>>> Assunto: Duvida -- Proxy Transparente protocolo https
>>> Para: portal-aprendendo-li...@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Olá srs, estou com duvidas quanto ao proxy transparente com atuação
>>> sobre o protocolo https.
>>> Tenho uma questão sobre a segurança, porque em meu entendimento quando
>>> há uma conexão segura, além da autenticidade do website ser "garantida" por
>>> uma entidade certificadora também existe a criptografia no texto enviado.
>>>
>>> Minha duvida é, se eu snifar a rede em um website seguro utilizando o
>>> proxy transparente eu não iria obter dados como o login e senha em websites
>>> que utilizam https.Uma vez que a ponte segura será feita entre meu squid e
>>> o servidor e não entre o navegador do usuário e o servidor.
>>>
>>> Alguém já fez esse teste?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Atenciosamente,
>>> Rodrigo da Silva Cunha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Atenciosamente,
>>> Rodrigo da Silva Cunha
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Flávio Menezes dos Reis
Analista de Informática
Seção de Infraestrutura de Rede - Assessoria de Informática
Procuradoria-Geral do Estado do RS
(51) 3288 1764

How to blocks clients between them in subnet

2016-07-18 Thread Pol Hallen 

I all

I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24

I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.

So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in 
192.168.2.0/24. And so for all clients.


Any idea?

thanks!

Pol

Re: Problema com a interface gráfica

2016-07-18 Thread Caroline Salib 
Bom dia.

Não consegui abrir a imagem. :/

Em sáb, 16 de jul de 2016 às 18:15, Henricky Lima 
escreveu:

>
> -- Mensagem encaminhada --
> De: Henricky Lima 
> Data: 12 de julho de 2016 10:37
> Assunto: Problema com a interface gráfica
> Para: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
>
>
> Ao instalar o Debian Jessie 8 no meu notebook ele apresentou um problema 
> (imagem)
>
> não sei como resolver esse problema procurei.
>
> Notebook novo com as seguintes características:
> 1.6 GHz quad core
> 4Gb de ram
> Acer
> HD 500 GB
>
>
> O que pode estar ocasionando esse problema?
>
> --
Atenciosamente,

Caroline Salib.
carolinesalib.github.io

Re: Internationalisation

2016-07-18 Thread Mark Fletcher 
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:04 PM Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) 
wrote:

> On 2016년 7월 17일 오후 6시 11분 25초 GMT+09:00, Mark Fletcher 
> wrote:
> FYI, Google's Noto CJK font is good/perfact for UTF-8 environments, i'm
> using now it  under Ubuntu 12.04.
>
> Debian also have Noto CJK fonts as package.
>
>
Thanks, good to know.

Mark

Re: Internationalisation

2016-07-18 Thread Mark Fletcher 
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:03 PM Mark Fletcher  wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 9:35 PM orang Aumori Jepun <
> mahu_bere...@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> >Hello list
>>
>>
>> Hi , Mark.
>>
>> And,
>
>> -right click the ibus icon on the task bar
>> -select "Preferences" on the menu
>> -"iBus Preferences" window shows up , and click "Input Method" tab.
>> - then , input methods list appears .
>>   and if you can not see "Japanese-Anthy" on that list,
>>  press "Add" button ,
>>  select "japanese" ,
>>  and then select "Anthy" ,
>>  then Japanese-Anthy should be added on the Input Method list.
>>
>>
>
>
Indeed this nailed it. I don't know how I missed Anthy the first time to be
honest. Anyway, set up now and can do Japanese input -- thanks!

Mark

Re: Fwd: Duvida -- Proxy Transparente protocolo https

2016-07-18 Thread Marcos Carraro 
Bom Dia,

Se ficar com um sniffer no proxy até consegue algumas informações...



*--*
Att
Marcos Carraro 


Em 17 de julho de 2016 22:08, Flávio  escreveu:

> Esse procedimento não quebra alguma norma estabelecida nas RFC´s?
>
>
>
>
> Em 17/07/2016 19:22, lucas castro escreveu:
>
> Na hora de importar na chave no navegador você pode marca a chave para
> confiar apenas para identificar chaves. Nunca fiz sniff para testar isso.
> Também tem a opção de apenas fazer túnel para algumas algumas conexões que
> o recomendo para sites como os de bancos.
>
> Em 16 de jul de 2016 5:09 PM, "Rodrigo Cunha" 
> escreveu:
>
>>
>> -- Mensagem encaminhada --
>> De: Rodrigo Cunha 
>> Data: 16 de julho de 2016 00:07
>> Assunto: Duvida -- Proxy Transparente protocolo https
>> Para: portal-aprendendo-li...@googlegroups.com
>>
>>
>> Olá srs, estou com duvidas quanto ao proxy transparente com atuação sobre
>> o protocolo https.
>> Tenho uma questão sobre a segurança, porque em meu entendimento quando há
>> uma conexão segura, além da autenticidade do website ser "garantida" por
>> uma entidade certificadora também existe a criptografia no texto enviado.
>>
>> Minha duvida é, se eu snifar a rede em um website seguro utilizando o
>> proxy transparente eu não iria obter dados como o login e senha em websites
>> que utilizam https.Uma vez que a ponte segura será feita entre meu squid e
>> o servidor e não entre o navegador do usuário e o servidor.
>>
>> Alguém já fez esse teste?
>>
>> --
>> Atenciosamente,
>> Rodrigo da Silva Cunha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Atenciosamente,
>> Rodrigo da Silva Cunha
>>
>>
>