stunnel or sibling?

[peter]

Hello,

The stunnel manual states "stunnel can be used to add SSL 
functionality to ... daemons ... ."

I'm interested in a complimentary case.  The remote server has SSL 
functionality.  I want to add SSL for a local client.  For example, a 
local elementary browser is not SSL capable but a connection to https 
is required.

Can stunnel or something else do that?

Thanks, ... Peter E.

-- 

123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789
Tel: +1 360 639 0202  Pender Is.: +1 250 629 3757
http://easthope.ca/Peter.html  Bcc: peter at easthope. ca

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[Brian]

On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 16:44:42 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Brian  wrote:
> > On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 18:40:38 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> >
> >> Brian  wrote:
> >> > I think viewing deb.debian.org as beta is fair. Viewing the redirector
> >> > as deprecated or about to be closed down in not correct. There is a
> >> > diversity of views in both threads.
> >>
> >> There are. But all more or less agree that httpredir.debian.org is
> >> unmaintained and just cruising along on auto-pilot.
> >
> > Very informative. Either would do for me in the UK, I think (assuming
> > httpredir.debian.org stays around). Should we now be recommending
> > deb.debian.org in user now? What do we get from it for our money?
> 
> I went through the threads posted by you and Sven. I think you can
> recommend httpredir service untill there is a formal announcement of
> moving to deb.debian.org . The httpredir service is just not
> maintained but not deprecated. If it does not work as expected, bugs
> can be filed[1] with the following pseudo headers.
> 
> Package: mirrors
> Severity: normal
> User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: httpredir

Seems to be a reasonable approach. Maybe deb.debian.org is better for
people with particular needs. I have to say I have generally done well
by the redirector in terms of speed and reliability.

The only thing I vaguely understand about the difference between the two
is that httpredir.debian.org uses the traditional mirror network whereas
deb.debian.org uses the Fastly CDN (Content Delivery Network) and there
is some caching going on. Because Fastly has local peering arrangements
mirror choices are supposed to be local (and hence faster). I've not
noticed any difference in a few short tests.

-- 
Brian.

-- 
Brian.

Error message from GParted, means what?

[Richard Owlett]

I've been getting a strange error messages when looking at some 8 
GB flash drives from different manufacturers purchased months apart.


There is a title bar at top saying "Libparted Warning (as superuser).
The body of the message box has:
  1. an Exclamation point surrounded by orange and yellow triangle.
  2. a message text saying "The driver descriptor says the 
physical block

 size is 2048 bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.
  3. There are two buttons present.
 One saying "Cancel"
 The other saying "Ignore"

On today's drive:
  1. I clicked "Cancel" then dismissed several boxes the gist of 
whose messages

 was that what I had started had not been done.
  2. The entire drive is shown as "allocated".
  3. Clicking on "New" yields message saying "No partition table 
found ..."
  4.I attempt to create partition table and get the "block 
sector size" message.

  5. Chose "ignore"
  6. Apparently then able to create a single 8 GB partition.

Any suggestions as to the problem's origin? I've no way to 
establish the history of the drive.


Any reason to expect future problems?

TIA

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[kamaraju kusumanchi]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Brian  wrote:
> On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 18:40:38 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
>> Brian  wrote:
>> > I think viewing deb.debian.org as beta is fair. Viewing the redirector
>> > as deprecated or about to be closed down in not correct. There is a
>> > diversity of views in both threads.
>>
>> There are. But all more or less agree that httpredir.debian.org is
>> unmaintained and just cruising along on auto-pilot.
>
> Very informative. Either would do for me in the UK, I think (assuming
> httpredir.debian.org stays around). Should we now be recommending
> deb.debian.org in user now? What do we get from it for our money?

I went through the threads posted by you and Sven. I think you can
recommend httpredir service untill there is a formal announcement of
moving to deb.debian.org . The httpredir service is just not
maintained but not deprecated. If it does not work as expected, bugs
can be filed[1] with the following pseudo headers.

Package: mirrors
Severity: normal
User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: httpredir

[1] - https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2016/04/msg00035.html
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

Re: debian on lenovo carbon thinkpad 4th generation confirmation report

[SteveA]

Good to know, thanks.

Instalación de xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu en Debian 8

[Jeison Cardona Gómez]

Hola, qué tal?

Bueno, quería preguntar si alguno se dio la tarea de actualizar 
XOrg en Debian 8 y probar el driver xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu ?, ¿qué 
tal les fue?


Gracias, que tengan un buen día.


--
/Enviado con Thunderbird/

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[Brian]

On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 18:40:38 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:

> Brian  wrote:
> 
> > For the -devel thread:
> 
> >   https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00071.html
> 
> I had a more recent thread in mind and I just found it. It was kind of
> buried inside the "When should we https our mirrors?" thread.
> 
> From: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/10/msg00362.html
> 
> ,[ Peter Palfrader 
> | > TL;DR: Would we now recommend deb.d.o over httpredir.d.o for
> | > production use e.g. in base images (including for Jessie)?
> |
> | Yes.
> `
> 
> And here https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/10/msg00490.html one
> of the maintainers behind deb.debian.org states the "experimental" phase
> has ended:
> 
> ,[ Tollef Fog Heen 
> | As of this morning, the bit about experimental was removed from the web
> | page.
> `
> 
> And here the reference for d-i (more precisely debootstrap) switching to
> deb.debian.org:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg6.html
> 
> > I think viewing deb.debian.org as beta is fair. Viewing the redirector
> > as deprecated or about to be closed down in not correct. There is a
> > diversity of views in both threads.
> 
> There are. But all more or less agree that httpredir.debian.org is
> unmaintained and just cruising along on auto-pilot.

Very informative. Either would do for me in the UK, I think (assuming
httpredir.debian.org stays around). Should we now be recommending
deb.debian.org in user now? What do we get from it for our money?

-- 
Brian.

Re: firewall para novatos

[Laotrasolucion]

El 26/11/16 a las 10:35, divagante escribió:
> Hola gente!
> 
>  Bueno, por conveniencia para quien quiera ayudarme con algun dato dire
> que soy un usuario de debian de 7 años de antiguedad, pero que aun no
> encontre el tiempo o las ganas de conocer profundamente la
> administracion de sistemas unix o redes...
>  No hago scrips ni entiendo sobre redes mas alla de configurar con
> alguna guia de ayuda /etc/network/interfaces. Algo que hace rato ni hago
> debido a los gestores como wicd o gnome.
> 
>  Si bien no descarto en un futuro leer y meterme con iptables, quisiera
> empezar al montar un futuro servidor de radio streaming, con un firewall
> intuitivo, facil de manejar y con interfaz grafica.
> 
>  Nota: recuerdo que hace ya algunos años usando windows y el antivirus
> kaspersky instale el firewall de este ultimo, y la verdad me resulto
> super intuitivo y manejable. Se veian claramente las peticiones de algun
> programa freeware hacia internet y como este las denegaba si uno con
> algunos clicks lo determinaba asi.
> 
>  Muchas gracias por su ayuda.
> 
> 

Hola,

Yo la verdad que no he usado mucho las GUI para iptables, pero la pagina
de iptables tiene un apartado con algunos.

http://www.iptables.info/en/iptables-gui.html

Yo personalmente he usado alguna vez fwbuilder, que esta bastante bien.
Hay bastante documentación y videos explicativos.
No se si algunos de los que existe pueda complacer tus requerimientos
tal como lo hizo don kaspersky, pero dejame decirte que armar un
firewall no es una tarea tan complicada, siempre y cuando entiendas los
conceptos.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Debian *not very good

[Rob van der Putten]

Hi there


On 26/11/16 18:38, Rob van der Putten wrote:




I run XFCE on my desktop. I had to add myself to sudo to make things
work properly.


And admin.
admin is needed to get xconsole syslog to work.
sudo to keep xdm logout from complaining. I use lightdm now though.
I edited the cups config manually. The web interface breaks stuff.


Regards,
Rob

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[Sven Hartge]

Brian  wrote:
> On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 11:51:19 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:

>> Thanks Sven. Is this still a beta service or mature enough to be
>> recommended to debian users? Hopefully there is a formal announcement
>> on this. As it stands, httpredir is mentioned in many places. For
>> example
>> 
>> https://www.debian.org/mirror/list
>> https://www.debian.org/mirror/
>> http://httpredir.debian.org/
>> 
>> and is all over the wiki (there are 145 hits for httpredir
>> site:wiki.debian.org in google).

> For the -devel thread:

>   https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00071.html

I had a more recent thread in mind and I just found it. It was kind of
buried inside the "When should we https our mirrors?" thread.

From: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/10/msg00362.html

,[ Peter Palfrader 
| > TL;DR: Would we now recommend deb.d.o over httpredir.d.o for
| > production use e.g. in base images (including for Jessie)?
|
| Yes.
`

And here https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/10/msg00490.html one
of the maintainers behind deb.debian.org states the "experimental" phase
has ended:

,[ Tollef Fog Heen 
| As of this morning, the bit about experimental was removed from the web
| page.
`

And here the reference for d-i (more precisely debootstrap) switching to
deb.debian.org:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg6.html

> I think viewing deb.debian.org as beta is fair. Viewing the redirector
> as deprecated or about to be closed down in not correct. There is a
> diversity of views in both threads.

There are. But all more or less agree that httpredir.debian.org is
unmaintained and just cruising along on auto-pilot.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Debian *not very good

[Rob van der Putten]

Hi there


On 25/11/16 22:26, Latincom wrote:


Is there a step by step guide or How to on line?
I have 1 Wheezy without Systemd, and i would like to upgrade it.
Thanks.


You can do both an upgrade and an install from scratch without systemd;
http://without-systemd.org/
http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_remove_systemd_from_the_Netinst_CD
http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_remove_systemd_from_a_Debian_jessie/sid_installation
http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/How_to_stay_with_sysvinit_in_Debian_Jessie.html
I had to make some other changes to get things to work though. Reading 
the release notes and keeping a close eye on the install process helps.


I run XFCE on my desktop. I had to add myself to sudo to make things 
work properly.



Regards,
Rob

Re: Jessie upgrade without systemd [was: Debian *not very good]

[Mart van de Wege]

Joe  writes:

> Sorry, I may not have been clear, I was saying that reinstalling to
> jump the 32/64 bit barrier has been the only significant upheaval in
> the progress of my server since sarge, and that reinstallation was like
> for like and therefore quite simple.
>
> If I have to reinstall the server with systemd from the beginning,
> because the upgrade is too difficult, then restoring its current
> functionality is likely to be significantly harder than the 32/64 bit
> change was. I will be migrating configurations between different Debian
> versions manually, at the same time as dealing with any systemd issues.
> I hope very much to avoid the need for that.
>

It really is hard to say. The upgrade can be painless, but there are
some services that have changed startup behaviour under systemd, and
they can get into some painful issues when reconfiguring. Mostly because
systemd handles dependencies differently from SysV init, and especially
because it does not blithely ignore failed dependencies.

You really are going to have to bite the bullet and build a test server.

Mart

-- 
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[Brian]

On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 11:51:19 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sven Hartge  wrote:
> > kamaraju kusumanchi  wrote:
> >
> >> Where is it documented that httpredir is deprecated and that we should
> >> use deb.debian.org's service going forward? Has it been announce
> >> somewhere?
> >
> > There has been a thread on debian-devel (I can't find the Message-ID at
> > the moment) and the latest version of the next debian-installer for
> > Stretch switched the URL from httpredir.debian.org to deb.debian.org.
> >
> >> Also, will it work for Jessie or is it more for stretch or later?
> >
> > It will work a bit more efficient for Stretch+, but it also works as
> > intended for Wheezy and Jessie.
> >
> 
> Thanks Sven. Is this still a beta service or mature enough to be
> recommended to debian users? Hopefully there is a formal announcement
> on this. As it stands, httpredir is mentioned in many places. For
> example
> 
> https://www.debian.org/mirror/list
> https://www.debian.org/mirror/
> http://httpredir.debian.org/
> 
> and is all over the wiki (there are 145 hits for httpredir
> site:wiki.debian.org in google).

For the -devel thread:

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00071.html

For the -project thread:

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2016/04/msg00012.html

I think viewing deb.debian.org as beta is fair. Viewing the redirector
as deprecated or about to be closed down in not correct. There is a
diversity of views in both threads.

> Now I feel stupid for filing
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845769 today morning
> asking httpredir to be discussed in the debian-handbook. :FacePalm:

Don't feel like that. You can either close the report with an explantion
or add to it saying you have become aware of deb.debian.org and leaving
any decision until things clarify may not be a bad idea.

-- 
Brian.

Re: Installation impossible sur Acer Travelmate 2400

[Samy Mezani]

Bonjour,

Le 26/11/2016 à 09:57, François LE GAD a écrit :

Si ça peut t'aider, j'ai un vieux portable Acer Aspire qui refuse de
démarrer avec le noyau 3.16, mais qui fonctionne correctement avec le
noyau 3.2.

Tu peux tenter une installation de Wheezy, puis, si ça marche, migrer
vers Jessie, choisir le 3.2 dans Grub au démarrage et éventuellement
désinstaller le noyau 3.16 ajouté par la mise à jour.


Merci bien pour le retour, je vais essayer avec wheezy.

Samy

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[kamaraju kusumanchi]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sven Hartge  wrote:
> kamaraju kusumanchi  wrote:
>
>> Where is it documented that httpredir is deprecated and that we should
>> use deb.debian.org's service going forward? Has it been announce
>> somewhere?
>
> There has been a thread on debian-devel (I can't find the Message-ID at
> the moment) and the latest version of the next debian-installer for
> Stretch switched the URL from httpredir.debian.org to deb.debian.org.
>
>> Also, will it work for Jessie or is it more for stretch or later?
>
> It will work a bit more efficient for Stretch+, but it also works as
> intended for Wheezy and Jessie.
>

Thanks Sven. Is this still a beta service or mature enough to be
recommended to debian users? Hopefully there is a formal announcement
on this. As it stands, httpredir is mentioned in many places. For
example

https://www.debian.org/mirror/list
https://www.debian.org/mirror/
http://httpredir.debian.org/

and is all over the wiki (there are 145 hits for httpredir
site:wiki.debian.org in google).

Now I feel stupid for filing
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845769 today morning
asking httpredir to be discussed in the debian-handbook. :FacePalm:

raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[Sven Hartge]

kamaraju kusumanchi  wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Sven Hartge  wrote:

>> httpredir is somewhat deprecated now.
>>
>> The new official service is deb.debian.org:
>>
>> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free
>>
>> But you can use both at the same time to get the maximum coverage, of
>> course.

> Where is it documented that httpredir is deprecated and that we should
> use deb.debian.org's service going forward? Has it been announce
> somewhere?

There has been a thread on debian-devel (I can't find the Message-ID at
the moment) and the latest version of the next debian-installer for
Stretch switched the URL from httpredir.debian.org to deb.debian.org.

> Also, will it work for Jessie or is it more for stretch or later?

It will work a bit more efficient for Stretch+, but it also works as
intended for Wheezy and Jessie.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[kamaraju kusumanchi]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Sven Hartge  wrote:
> kamaraju kusumanchi  wrote:
>
>> For these and many other reasons, it is better to use the "mirror
>> redirector service". The idea is to add something like
>
>> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free
>
>> in the /etc/apt/sources.list and let apt-get figure out the best
>> mirror for you. More details on this approach can be found at
>> http://httpredir.debian.org/ .
>
> httpredir is somewhat deprecated now.
>
> The new official service is deb.debian.org:
>
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free
>
> But you can use both at the same time to get the maximum coverage, of
> course.

Where is it documented that httpredir is deprecated and that we should
use deb.debian.org's service going forward? Has it been announce
somewhere?

Also, will it work for Jessie or is it more for stretch or later?

thanks
raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

debian on lenovo carbon thinkpad 4th generation confirmation report

[iqwue Wabv]

Hello,

I would like to confirm the successfully running Debian testing 
'stretch' on Lenovo Thinkpad Carbon X1 4th generation:


TYPE 20FC-0038PB production 16/07

1) jessie wifi doesn't work because lack of drivers for Intel® Dual Band 
Wireless-AC 8260


which is only available in >4.1 linux kernel. So I have to upgrade my 
installation from jessie to testing


2) after adding firmware 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/_media/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi-8000-ucode-25.30.13.0.tgz


to /lib/firmware wifi works correctly

3) audio and video works

4) suspend/resume works

5) gnome desktop works

6) usb 3.0 works

7) keyboard/touchpad works


Greets to all Debian users,

Karol

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[Sven Hartge]

kamaraju kusumanchi  wrote:

> For these and many other reasons, it is better to use the "mirror
> redirector service". The idea is to add something like

> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free

> in the /etc/apt/sources.list and let apt-get figure out the best
> mirror for you. More details on this approach can be found at
> http://httpredir.debian.org/ .

httpredir is somewhat deprecated now. 

The new official service is deb.debian.org:

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free

But you can use both at the same time to get the maximum coverage, of
course.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Jessie upgrade without systemd [was: Debian *not very good]

[Joe]

On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 09:01:33 -0500
Henning Follmann  wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:27:07AM +, Joe wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:02:50 +0100
> >  wrote:
> >   
> > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:  
> >   
> > > > 
> > > > If you do a normal dist-upgrade Wheezy to Jessie, sysvinit will
> > > > be replaced with systemd.
> > > 
> > > Not forcefully.
> > >   
> > > > And probably screw everything up..
> > > 
> > > Now this is an unnecessarily loaded statement. Given the smoking
> > > holes the last flame war has left[1], I'd tread carefully if I
> > > were you ;-) 
> > 
> > A fair number of wheezy systems will be servers, upgraded many
> > times. Mine started out as sarge. What are the odds of such a
> > system making the change to systemd without problems?
> >   
> 
> A reasonable amount.
> I did it, and experienced no issues at all. In fact I had more issues
> while upgrading to wheezy.

Good to hear. Yes, upgrades have been getting progressively less easy.

> 
> > I converted a sid to systemd, but had to give up on it as it became
> > too flaky, unstable in all senses of the word. A workstation isn't
> > really a problem to reinstall from scratch, an old server is a
> > nightmare.
> > 
> > Obviously I had to do a reinstallation to move to 64 bits, but that
> > was a get-selections/set-selections job, with the old /etc pretty
> > much copied over. All the same software, just 64 bit, and more
> > importantly, all the old scripts. That's not going to work with a
> > systemd-based reinstall.  
> 
> You hardly can blame systemd for a 32/64 bit switch.
> so you exchange binaries, and? Not s systemd issue.

Sorry, I may not have been clear, I was saying that reinstalling to
jump the 32/64 bit barrier has been the only significant upheaval in
the progress of my server since sarge, and that reinstallation was like
for like and therefore quite simple.

If I have to reinstall the server with systemd from the beginning,
because the upgrade is too difficult, then restoring its current
functionality is likely to be significantly harder than the 32/64 bit
change was. I will be migrating configurations between different Debian
versions manually, at the same time as dealing with any systemd issues.
I hope very much to avoid the need for that.

> 
> And while we are at a network issue topic (OP).
> Systemd is actually better than any network-manager or your beloved
> init scripts at that. It tracks much more reliably the status of your
> interfaces than any other method. Period.
> 

Good, although I have had no trouble with networking so far, and have
never installed network-manager on this machine. It has two permanent
Ethernet ports and no other interfaces than lo and an openvpn server.

-- 
Joe

AlienWare 17" R3 et clavier lumineux

[G2PC]

Bonjour,

J'ai actuellement un ordinateur AlienWare 17" R3 conseillé par la
communauté.
Je suis satisfait car la machine fonctionne bien et est performante.

J'utilise différents systèmes d'exploitation en VM, notamment Debian
avec XFCE.

J'aimerais vos avis pour pouvoir configurer mon clavier lumineux.
Mon hote n'est pas Debian mais Linux Mint Sarah.

J'aurais voulu changer la couleur du clavier lumineux, sur une des VM ou
Debian est installé.
En fait, je me trompe surement, cela doit dépendre du système Hote.

Actuellement le clavier lumineux est de couleur bleu par défaut.
J'aurais aimé le passé au rouge, pour les VM de pentest.
Je chipote un peu, c'est pour un confort à l'usage.

Si vous avez des idées pour m'accompagner, je suis curieux et intéressé
par vos avis.
J'ai possibilité également de lancer l'ordinateur avec Windows 10.
Je n'ai pas encore tenté de changer la couleur du clavier, même depuis
Windows 10.

C'est assez nouveau pour moi, les claviers lumineux, ce n'est pas
essentiel, mais, agréable.
Merci à vous.

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[kamaraju kusumanchi]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 5:59 AM, amir khan  wrote:
> Hello!
> I am unable to configure the package manager. The mirrors given in the list
> of INDIA can't fetch any content.
> Is there any other way to configure it. I would really appreciate any help.
>
> Thank You!

Hi Amir Khan,

There are currently 3 Debian mirrors in India - debianmirror.nkn.in,
ftp.iitm.ac.in, mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in . The list changes from time to
time. To get the latest set of mirrors, go to
https://www.debian.org/mirror/list and search for the country of
interest (which in your case is India).

You can try these mirrors one-by-one and see which one works for you.
But I do not suggest this for the following reasons

1) This is not a scalable approach. For example, there could be many
mirrors for some countries (ex:- United States has 60) and trying each
can be tiring.
2) Geographical proximity to a mirror does not always mean that it
will serve you best.
3) Not all mirrors carry all the architectures. For example,
debianmirror.nkn.in carries three architectures while ftp.iitm.ac.in
carries five.
4) The process has to be repeated every time you move to a different
location which can be annoying for laptop users.

For these and many other reasons, it is better to use the "mirror
redirector service". The idea is to add something like

deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free

in the /etc/apt/sources.list and let apt-get figure out the best
mirror for you. More details on this approach can be found at
http://httpredir.debian.org/ .

hope that helps
raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

Re: Jessie upgrade without systemd [was: Debian *not very good]

[Henning Follmann]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:27:07AM +, Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:02:50 +0100
>  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > If you do a normal dist-upgrade Wheezy to Jessie, sysvinit will be
> > > replaced with systemd.  
> > 
> > Not forcefully.
> > 
> > > And probably screw everything up..  
> > 
> > Now this is an unnecessarily loaded statement. Given the smoking holes
> > the last flame war has left[1], I'd tread carefully if I were you ;-)
> > 
> 
> A fair number of wheezy systems will be servers, upgraded many times.
> Mine started out as sarge. What are the odds of such a system making the
> change to systemd without problems?
> 

A reasonable amount.
I did it, and experienced no issues at all. In fact I had more issues while
upgrading to wheezy.

> I converted a sid to systemd, but had to give up on it as it became too
> flaky, unstable in all senses of the word. A workstation isn't really a
> problem to reinstall from scratch, an old server is a nightmare.
> 
> Obviously I had to do a reinstallation to move to 64 bits, but that was
> a get-selections/set-selections job, with the old /etc pretty much
> copied over. All the same software, just 64 bit, and more importantly,
> all the old scripts. That's not going to work with a systemd-based
> reinstall.

You hardly can blame systemd for a 32/64 bit switch.
so you exchange binaries, and? Not s systemd issue.

And while we are at a network issue topic (OP).
Systemd is actually better than any network-manager or your beloved init
scripts at that. It tracks much more reliably the status of your interfaces
than any other method. Period.

-H



-- 
Henning Follmann   | hfollm...@itcfollmann.com

Re: Is preseed.cfg flexible enough?

[Andy Smith]

Hi Richard,

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 06:56:23AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Can preseed.cfg handle those and similar in an D.E. agnostic manner?

If you can't find a feature or setting built in to d-i's preseed,
then you can always preseed a program or shell script and run it at
the end of the install:

d-i preseed/late_command/path/to/some/script.sh

So yes ultimately preseed can do anything, with a greater or lesser
degree of effort.

It seems like you have already worked out the commands to type to
fix your issues manually, so you are half way there.

If the problem is how to achieve it globally, regardless of desktop
environment, then I would suggest the question isn't really about
preseed. The first step would be to work out how to do it manually,
and then put it in preseed.cfg.

I'm afraid I don't know how to solve your issues globally without
regard to desktop environment.

Cheers,
Andy

Re: Jessie upgrade without systemd [was: Debian *not very good]

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:27:07AM +, Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:02:50 +0100
>  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > If you do a normal dist-upgrade Wheezy to Jessie, sysvinit will be
> > > replaced with systemd.  
> > 
> > Not forcefully.
> > 
> > > And probably screw everything up..  
> > 
> > Now this is an unnecessarily loaded statement. Given the smoking holes
> > the last flame war has left[1], I'd tread carefully if I were you ;-)
> > 
> 
> A fair number of wheezy systems will be servers, upgraded many times.
> Mine started out as sarge. What are the odds of such a system making the
> change to systemd without problems?

[...]

> And my server doesn't have X. But I don't expect that to eliminate all
> systemd problems.

I'd say you are in a pretty good shape to choose whatever init system
suits you without big problems, then.

regards
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlg5jeMACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaaAwCeLOlri8qYZzoGouk/KtCWFXYC
a0EAnA3o0NsEaTlzzH/3aYj0J99pJq0+
=MAqs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

firewall para novatos

[divagante]

Hola gente!

 Bueno, por conveniencia para quien quiera ayudarme con algun dato dire 
que soy un usuario de debian de 7 años de antiguedad, pero que aun no 
encontre el tiempo o las ganas de conocer profundamente la 
administracion de sistemas unix o redes...
 No hago scrips ni entiendo sobre redes mas alla de configurar con 
alguna guia de ayuda /etc/network/interfaces. Algo que hace rato ni hago 
debido a los gestores como wicd o gnome.


 Si bien no descarto en un futuro leer y meterme con iptables, quisiera 
empezar al montar un futuro servidor de radio streaming, con un firewall 
intuitivo, facil de manejar y con interfaz grafica.


 Nota: recuerdo que hace ya algunos años usando windows y el antivirus 
kaspersky instale el firewall de este ultimo, y la verdad me resulto 
super intuitivo y manejable. Se veian claramente las peticiones de algun 
programa freeware hacia internet y como este las denegaba si uno con 
algunos clicks lo determinaba asi.


 Muchas gracias por su ayuda.

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 04:29:19PM +0530, amir khan wrote:
> Hello!
> I am unable to configure the package manager. The mirrors given in the list
> of INDIA can't fetch any content.
> Is there any other way to configure it. I would really appreciate any help.

Have you tried with any other mirrors?

regards
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlg5jkQACgkQBcgs9XrR2kavDwCfTsv7zZ2LUqcHyCpqb2J5rQbu
GBEAn26EQPj23nM1fPr1ASrTTBYPecuE
=hwF2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Is preseed.cfg flexible enough?

[Richard Owlett]

I have a laptop whose *SOLE* purpose is to have multiple installs 
of Debian for demonstration of different ways Debian may be 
configured. While I work out kinks I am using Mate as my D.E.


I find some Debian defaults annoying. Setting them to reasonable 
values on a running system is straight forward but becomes 
annoying every time an installation is done.


Problem 1. Defeat automounting of usb flash drives
   This can be handled by
 gsettings set org.mate.media-handling automount false
   on a running system if Mate is installed.

Problem 2. Default font size is too small.
In Mate that can be remedied *on a PER USER* basis by menu 
option

   System>-Preferences->Appearance->Fonts
The default there is "10". I also have note that "10" 
appears as a default size
elsewhere implying that it is system wide. Can I force 
everything to use "14"?


Problem 3. File-managers default to pretty Icons rather than 
informative List view.


Can preseed.cfg handle those and similar in an D.E. agnostic manner?
The possibility is hinted near the end of 
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apbs05.html.en#preseed-chainload 
.


TIA

Re: Controlar navegacion a usuarios de office365

[kazabe]

Basicamente con la idea de convertir la lista negra a ip solo
agregaria al firewall las direcciones a bloquear.  Para bloquear
sitios adicionales seria igual convertir la url a ip..  De resto todo
saldria por el nat.

Pero busco algo mas organizado.  Por ejemplo: cuando necesite generar
reportes de navegacion, no tendre como hacerlo ya que no tengo logs
del proxy (pues estan saliendo directamente por nat).

Como gestionan ustedes las conexiones de office 365?
«Existen dos cosas infinitas:
el universo y la estupidez humana... y no estoy muy seguro de la primera» :
Albert Einstein


El día 25 de noviembre de 2016, 20:52, Jeison Cardona Gómez
 escribió:
> ¿De qué manera identificas las direcciones adicionales?
>
>
> El 11/25/2016 a las 07:43 PM, kazabe escribió:
>
> Hola.
>
> El /etc/hosts usaria direcciones estaticas, asi que creo que seguiria el
> mismo problema, si lo que busco es lograr excepciones para office365
>
> la opcion que estoy intentando es tomar una de las listas negras de
> squidguard e intentar convertir sus url a ips, para bloquearlas desde el
> firewall.   Pero creo que debe haber una solucion mas completa.
>
> Sended from KitKat
>
> El nov 25, 2016 6:48 PM, "Jeison Cardona Gómez"
>  escribió:
>>
>> Y si usas el archivo /etc/hosts ?
>>
>>
>> El 11/25/2016 a las 06:41 PM, kazabe escribió:
>>
>> Holas.
>>
>> Tengo un servidor firewall/proxy  desde el cual controlo el uso de
>> internet por medio de squidguard.
>>
>> Solo se puede acceder a internet por proxy, pero para no estar
>> modificando excepciones para ciertos sitios, uso un archivo .pac en
>> cada navegador.
>>
>> Hasta hace poco todo iba de maravilla, hasta que decidieron migrar los
>> correos a office365.   Desde ese momento los controles de internet
>> tuvieron que ser practicamente anulados, dando salida total por nat a
>> todas las estaciones.
>>
>> Microsoft muy amablemente tiene publicados los puertos, direcciones y
>> configuraciones necesarias para garantizar que su escenario funcione,
>> asi que me puse en la tarea de crear en el firewall (shorewall que al
>> final es iptables) las excepciones correspondientes publicados por
>> ellos, asi como en el archivo .pac.  Cuando vuelvo a activar los
>> controles, comienzan a presentarse inconsistencias que solo se
>> resuelven volviendo a dar salida total sin restricciones.
>>
>> Al parecer lo que esta afectando es que parte de esos servicios
>> funcionan con CDNs de terceros que no publican sus direcciones (y que
>> en varios casos son dinamicas).
>>
>> Mi idea inicial era agregar toda esa cantidad de direcciones a las
>> excepciones del firewall y del archivo.pac, pero cuando ya me dicen
>> que debo autorizar algo como
>>
>> *.microsoft.com
>>
>> no veo como hacer que el firewall comprenda eso.
>>
>> Alguno de ustedes ha tenido un escenario similar y ha logrado
>> solucionarlo? como gestiona esa situacion?
>>
>> Ya llevo varios dias luchando con esto y los jefes estan comenzando a
>> evaluar reemplazar el linux por un fortinet.  No busco entrar en
>> discusion acerca de ese producto, pero si deseo poder demostrar que el
>> firewall en linux puede cumplir con la necesidad.
>>
>> gracias a todos.
>>
>>
>> «Existen dos cosas infinitas:
>> el universo y la estupidez humana... y no estoy muy seguro de la primera»
>> :
>> Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>> --
>> Enviado con Thunderbird
>
>
> --
> Enviado con Thunderbird

Re: Modem oem-config sur debian 8.4

[Jean Bernon]

Je ne connais pas vraiment le contexte de votre question, mais je risque une 
réponse. Manifestement le paquet oem-config est propre à ubuntu. On peut 
toujours tester une installation sur Debian. Sinon, si vous installez Debian 
avec un environnement graphique Gnome, la fonction "utilisateurs" de Gnome 
semble être une alternative. Il faut livrer le PC avec le mot de passe de root 
et l'interface de la fonction "utilisateurs" permet au client de configurer le 
compte utilisateur installé par défaut (nom affiché, type de compte, 
langue/pays, mot de passe), voire de supprimer ce compte par défaut pour en 
créer un ou plusieurs de son choix. N'est-ce pas suffisant ? 

- Mail original -

> De: "Michel Memeteau - EKIMIA" 
> À: "debian-user-french" 
> Envoyé: Samedi 26 Novembre 2016 11:18:51
> Objet: Re: Modem oem-config sur debian 8.4

> Bonjour , aucune réponse ? in

> ça nous gêne un peu car on vends des Pcs avec debian préinstallé et
> on est obligé de pré configuré un compte et un mot de passe.

> Si quelqu'un a une idée ...

> photo
> Michel Memeteau
> Directeur, Ekimia SAS
> +33 (0)9 72 30 83 34 | m...@ekimia.fr | Notre WebBoutique :
> http://shop.ekimia.fr | 49 chemin union 13720 La bouilladisse
> FRANCE

> Contactez nous directement par Tchat sur http://bit.ly/ekichat

> Le 18 mai 2016 à 20:57, Michel Memeteau - EKIMIA < cont...@ekimia.fr
> > a écrit :

> > Bonjour a tous ,
> 

> > Y a t il un mode oem-config dans Debian comme sur Ubuntu qui permet
> > de mettre le système dans un état "usine" pour que la personne
> > puisse choisir son nom d’utilisateur et son mot de passe ?
> 

> > Merci .
> 

> > photo
> 
> > Michel Memeteau
> 
> > Directeur, Ekimia SAS
> 
> > +33 (0)9 72 30 83 34 | m...@ekimia.fr | WebBoutique Pc GNU/Linux :
> > http://shop.ekimia.fr | 49 chemin union 13720 La bouilladisse
> 
> > FRANCE
> 

> > Contactez nous directement par Tchat sur http://bit.ly/ekichat
> 

Package configure problem during Installation.

[amir khan]

Hello!
I am unable to configure the package manager. The mirrors given in the list
of INDIA can't fetch any content.
Is there any other way to configure it. I would really appreciate any help.

Thank You!

Re: Clé usb wifi

[contact]

  
  
la TPLINK TL-WN722N fonctionne aussi très bien 

François-Marie BILLARD
  Sculpteur - Céramiste 

Le 25/11/2016 à 14:12, David Martin a
  écrit :


  

  ah ok c'est un mini pc...
  
  Je doute que ça passe, ce n'est pas la même clé ... du coup le
  chip non plus.

Je gratterai ce soir.
  

  
  
Le 25 novembre 2016 à 14:08, Maxime
  Flasquin 
  a écrit :
  

  

  On
25/11/2016 14:05, David Martin wrote:
  
  

  Merci,
je ne connais pas raspbian, c'est quoi  ?


  
  J'ai oublié de précisé qu'il me faudrait une
double bande

  
  J'ai une TPLink T2U qui fonctionne bien sous
windows 7, mais impossible de la faire tourner
sous Jessie, j'ai recompilé et recompilé le
drivers, rien n'y fait... impossible de se
connecter... je choppe le signal... le ssid,
j'ai tout essayé... keudale.

  
  Je vais donc acheter une nouvelle clé, mais
quoi...


  


  Le 25 novembre 2016 à
14:01, Maxime Flasquin 
a écrit :

  

  
On
  25/11/2016 13:53, David Martin wrote:


  

  Bonjour,

  
  Je cherche une clé usb wifi qui
  serait 100% compatible Jessie
  

Pourriez-vous me conseiller une
  marque en particulier ?


  

  -- 
  
david martin
  
  

  

  

  

  

Bonjour,
J'ai justement installé hier soir cette
  clé usb wifi : tl-wn823n
Je l'ai installée sur raspbian jessie.
  J'ai eu à installer le bon driver en
  suivant cette solution http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/54716/raspberry-1-no-wifi-dongle-detected-tp-link-tl-wn823n

Maxime Flasquin

  

  
  
  
  
  -- 
  
david martin
  
  

  

  

  
  Raspbian est une version de Debian spécialement
compilée pour le raspberrypi. Tu peux sans doute essayer
la solution que j'ai envoyé dans mon précédent mail, ça
a fonctionné pour moi et il s'agit également d'une clé
TP Link
  

  




-- 

  david martin


  

  


  

Re: Jessie upgrade without systemd [was: Debian *not very good]

[Joe]

On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:02:50 +0100
 wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:

> > 
> > If you do a normal dist-upgrade Wheezy to Jessie, sysvinit will be
> > replaced with systemd.  
> 
> Not forcefully.
> 
> > And probably screw everything up..  
> 
> Now this is an unnecessarily loaded statement. Given the smoking holes
> the last flame war has left[1], I'd tread carefully if I were you ;-)
> 

A fair number of wheezy systems will be servers, upgraded many times.
Mine started out as sarge. What are the odds of such a system making the
change to systemd without problems?

I converted a sid to systemd, but had to give up on it as it became too
flaky, unstable in all senses of the word. A workstation isn't really a
problem to reinstall from scratch, an old server is a nightmare.

Obviously I had to do a reinstallation to move to 64 bits, but that was
a get-selections/set-selections job, with the old /etc pretty much
copied over. All the same software, just 64 bit, and more importantly,
all the old scripts. That's not going to work with a systemd-based
reinstall.

> 
> If you want a straight upgrade without systemd, apt-pinning seems
> to be the agreed upon way:
> 
>   
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system
> 
> Note that many things (Gnome, I'm looking at you) *require* systemd
> these days: it'll be much more difficult to avoid systemd if you
> want a "modern" desktop environment.
> 
> Myself, I'm on Fvwm. I don't even need DBUS :-D
> 

And my server doesn't have X. But I don't expect that to eliminate all
systemd problems.

-- 
Joe

Re: Modem oem-config sur debian 8.4

[Michel Memeteau - EKIMIA]

Bonjour , aucune réponse ?

ça nous gêne un peu car on vends des Pcs avec debian préinstallé et on est
obligé de pré configuré un compte et un mot de passe.

Si quelqu'un a une idée ...

[image: photo]
*Michel Memeteau*
Directeur, Ekimia SAS
+33 (0)9 72 30 83 34 <+33+9+72+30+83+34> | m...@ekimia.fr | Notre WebBoutique
: http://shop.ekimia.fr  | 49 chemin union 13720 La
bouilladisse
 FRANCE




Contactez nous directement par Tchat sur http://bit.ly/ekichat




Le 18 mai 2016 à 20:57, Michel Memeteau - EKIMIA  a
écrit :

> Bonjour a tous ,
>
> Y a t il un mode oem-config dans Debian comme sur Ubuntu qui permet de
> mettre le système dans un état "usine" pour que la personne puisse choisir
> son nom d’utilisateur et son mot de passe ?
>
> Merci .
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: photo]
> *Michel Memeteau*
> Directeur, Ekimia SAS
> +33 (0)9 72 30 83 34 <+33+9+72+30+83+34> | m...@ekimia.fr | WebBoutique Pc
> GNU/Linux : http://shop.ekimia.fr  | 49 chemin
> union 13720 La bouilladisse
>  FRANCE
> 
> 
> 
>
> Contactez nous directement par Tchat sur http://bit.ly/ekichat
> 
>
>
>

Re: forcefsck inconsistency

[Pierre Frenkiel]

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, David Wright wrote:


As for the root filesystem, are you saying that it was not checked
even when you did what I suggested? What does
# tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 | grep 'st ch'
show (assuming / is /dev/sda1)?



  hi David,
  I said "inconsistency, but I must add "behaviour impossible to understand":

  1/
 According the tune2fs output, the check on / was actually done.
 I naïvely looked at syslog to find the checked devices, and I could  not 
imagine
 that the fsck checks are reported in syslog for all partitions, but not 
for /...

  2/
 An other strange behaviour. For my /dev/sda3 ext4 partition, I get:
 in syslog
 Nov 26 07:53:37 pfr2 systemd[1]: Started File System Check on 
/dev/sda3.
 with ->>tune2fs -l /dev/sda3 | grep 'st ch'
 Last checked: Wed Nov 23 11:35:43 2016

  3/
for the /dev/sdg1 partition for which no check was done at boot, I tried
manually, but that didn't work. I then decided to recreate it (it was just
a backup):
   - delete all partitions on /dev/sdg
   - add a Linux partition
   - run mkfs.ext4
After that, the "Maximum mount count" was -1. Is this normal?
I then set it to 30, and the behaviour is half normal: the fsck check is not
done at boot, but I can do it manually. I imagine that it's a specific 
feature of
this Seagate model.

cheers,
--
Pierre Frenkiel

Jessie upgrade without systemd [was: Debian *not very good]

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:26:06 + (UTC) Latincom 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:31:54 +, Brian wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri 25 Nov 2016 at 15:21:23 +, oldbluebear wrote:
> > > 
> > > [...Lots of disgruntlement snipped...]
> > > 
> > >> How can I at this stage bring this machine back nearer to SySV?
> > > 
> > > You can bring it back in all its glory with
> > > 
> > >   apt-get install sysvinit-core
> > 
> > Is there a step by step guide or How to on line?
> > I have 1 Wheezy without Systemd, and i would like to upgrade it.
> > Thanks.
> 
> If you do a normal dist-upgrade Wheezy to Jessie, sysvinit will be
> replaced with systemd.

Not forcefully.

> And probably screw everything up..

Now this is an unnecessarily loaded statement. Given the smoking holes
the last flame war has left[1], I'd tread carefully if I were you ;-)

> I suggest
> you do what I did: a clean install of a terminal only Jessie system,
> replace systemd with sysvinit, then build the system up from there.
> Just remember GNOME3 has systemd as a dependency.  Other utilities do,
> too. I used LXDE which doesn't to keep things simple.  I usually just
> run a window manager Openbox and a single LXPanel, but that involves a
> lot more configuration.  Too much for an initial test.

While possible, this isn't really necessary. FWIW I managed a clean
Jessie upgrade without touching systemd, by just following the
instructions.

If you want a straight upgrade without systemd, apt-pinning seems
to be the agreed upon way:

  
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system

Note that many things (Gnome, I'm looking at you) *require* systemd
these days: it'll be much more difficult to avoid systemd if you
want a "modern" desktop environment.

Myself, I'm on Fvwm. I don't even need DBUS :-D

thanks

[1] Sorry for the somewhat grumpy tone, but I'm pretty tired of people
   whining about systemd and borderline disrupting otherwise functional
   mailing lists with their rage. I strongly dislike systemd, yes, but
   i see no reason to hate systemd proponents let alone to harrass them.
   On the contrary, they are doing free software, FFS!

   If all that energy spent on foaming at the mouth and hatred had been
   spent on keeping viable alternatives to systemd afloat and running,
   we'd be in much better shape these days (and perhaps MikeeeUSA
   would have found other coattails to ride on).

- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlg5T7oACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ7vACcDEQ6DAqH1YBcKkdTJfv+fBin
PXIAmwQTe2QUPn1tSD8XhjPhaTH/BatB
=8Pqr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Installation impossible sur Acer Travelmate 2400

[François LE GAD]

Le 16/11/2016 à 23:16, Samy Mezani a écrit :

Bonjour,

C'est la première fois en 10 ans que ça m'arrive. Impossible d'installer
une Debian sur un portable Acer TraveMate 2403WXMi... Moi qui voulait
convertir une personne qui ne possède qu'un ordinosaure…
...
Un problème avec le noyau 3.16 ou avec le vieux processeur Intel Celeron


Si ça peut t'aider, j'ai un vieux portable Acer Aspire qui refuse de 
démarrer avec le noyau 3.16, mais qui fonctionne correctement avec le 
noyau 3.2.


Tu peux tenter une installation de Wheezy, puis, si ça marche, migrer 
vers Jessie, choisir le 3.2 dans Grub au démarrage et éventuellement 
désinstaller le noyau 3.16 ajouté par la mise à jour.


Je me souviens d'avoir vu, il y a peu de temps, un CD Wheezy fourni avec 
je ne sais plus quelle revue dédiée à Linux.


--
François

Re: fichiers bizarres sur la racine du système de fichiers

[BM]

Le 26/11/2016 à 01:42, Frederic MASSOT a écrit :

Le 25/11/2016 à 23:18, BM a écrit :
[...]

bonsoir,

root@emporaire:~# fsck -t ext3 /dev/sdc
fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
/dev/sdc is mounted.
e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.

j'ai essayé
fsck -t ext3 /dev/sdc
fsck -t ext4 /dev/sdc
fsck -t m...e /dev/sdc


man fsck

sinon essaye : e2fsck -f /dev/sdc

et man e2fsck pour t'informer.

- Dans un précédent post tu as parlé de système RAID, tu connais les
détails de l'assemblage ?





Bonjour,
les comparatifs armagnac 1980 et Cognac bio sont incompatibles avec des 
manifs fines ;-)


donc ce matin:

root@emporaire:~# umount /dev/sdc
root@emporaire:~# e2fsck -f /dev/sdc
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
mstr_deb864hvm: 240096/4259840 files (0.7% non-contiguous), 
13473750/17039360 blocks

root@emporaire:~#

et toujours après redémarrage

root@acacs:~# ls -ld /*
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 / $?=??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 / ???
-rwsrwsrwt   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 / ?"?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?{??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?\??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??:?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??(
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??%?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /
-rwsrwsrwt   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /
-rwsrwsrwt   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /
-rwsrwsrwt   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /???
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /???@
-rwsrwsrwt   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /???
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?.??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /0?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /0???
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /0{?f??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /8?I?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /8?P?
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?9??
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 nov.  11 17:10 /bin
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 oct.  20 17:52 /boot
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /default_headers
drwxr-xr-x  14 root root  3880 nov.  26 08:51 /dev
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??E?
drwxr-xr-x 110 root root  4096 nov.  26 08:51 /etc
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??F?
drwx--   2 root root  4096 nov.  26 08:51 /gandi
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?h
drwxr-xr-x   6 root root  4096 nov.  13 16:35 /home
-rwsrwsrwt   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?j??
drwxr-xr-x  14 root root  4096 oct.  20 17:52 /lib
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 sept. 30 17:39 /lib64
drwx--   2 root root 16384 déc.   1  2014 /lost+found
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 déc.   2  2014 /media
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 déc.   2  2014 /mnt
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?n??
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 déc.   2  2014 /opt
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /P???
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /P???
dr-xr-xr-x 128 root root 0 nov.  26 08:50 /proc
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?r
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?R??
drwxr-x---  13 root root  4096 nov.  26 08:54 /root
drwxr-xr-x  27 root root   820 nov.  26 08:54 /run
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 oct.  28 10:28 /sbin
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 nov.  14 10:21 /srv
dr-xr-xr-x  12 root root 0 nov.  26 08:53 /sys
drwxrwxrwt   7 root root  4096 nov.  26 09:00 /tmp
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?"U?
drwxr-xr-x  11 root root  4096 août   1 15:39 /usr
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?V??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?V??
drwxr-xr-x  14 root root  4096 nov.  14 11:23 /var
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?W??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /?x??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /x@??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /x???
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /X!??
--   1 root root 0 janv.  1  1970 /??Y?
root@acacs:~#


bonne journée,
Bernard