major problem with gnome-games dependency

2005-10-11 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I work at a government laboratory where computer games are prohibited. I 
also use the gnome desktop. When I try to remove gnome-games apt wanst 
to remove gnome because gnome depends on gnome-games. This is really a 
show-stopper for government use of Linux. Also, I would think that the 
dependency should work the other way: gnome-games should depend on gnome.


Art Edwards

--
Arthur H. Edwards
Senior Research Physicist
Air Force Research Laboratory
AFRL/VSSE
Bldg. 914
3550 Aberdeen Ave. SE
KAFB, NM 87117-5776

(505) 853-6042 (O)
(505) 463-6722 (C)
(505) 846-2290 (F)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: major problem with gnome-games dependency

2005-10-11 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I want to thank all of you for responding. I'm quoting here a response I 
gave to an off-line communication because I thought it might be germane 
to the discussion. I have expanded my response a little.


I have removed gnome, gnome-desktop-environment and gnome-games with no
apparent side effects. However, there were a number of KDE games that
I had to remove by hand (Yes, I had both KDE and gnome on the machine).


The workings of meta packages are very interesting and, in the end, very 
clean, if you are initiated (as I am beginning to be). I would just 
point out that if Debian is targeting
scientists and engineers with limited time, and some, but not burning, 
curiosity about installation, that you spend a little time thinking 
about how to make meta packages transparent at installation.


As a layman's recommendation, it might be nice to have a gnome
installation dialog that asked you to check the components you want for
installation, similar to the task selection on the (old?) debian
installer. Some care would be required so that this had a human level of 
detail. For example, you might have tasks, such as mail, office, games, 
network (or, perhaps, browser). This would always be imperfect, but it 
would obviate the need for gnome-without-games or 
gnome-without-evolution, etc.


Art Edwards

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I work at a government laboratory where computer games are prohibited. I 
also use the gnome desktop. When I try to remove gnome-games apt wanst 
to remove gnome because gnome depends on gnome-games. This is really a 
show-stopper for government use of Linux. Also, I would think that the 
dependency should work the other way: gnome-games should depend on gnome.
   



I worked at a government laboratory where computer games were prohibited.
We used Debian there; it behaved exactly the same way.  Strangely, it
didn't cause us a problem.

The reason it didn't is because when you remove gnome-games, apt does
*not* try to remove the GNOME desktop.  Instead, it tries to remove
the meta-package gnome, which is not the same thing.

You may want to google this list's archives on what meta-packages are
and how they work.

Cheers,

-c

P.S.  The meta-package gnome's dependence upon the (meta?) package
gnome-games is perfectly sane, given what meta-packages are for.





 



--
Arthur H. Edwards
Senior Research Physicist
Air Force Research Laboratory
AFRL/VSSE
Bldg. 914
3550 Aberdeen Ave. SE
KAFB, NM 87117-5776

(505) 853-6042 (O)
(505) 463-6722 (C)
(505) 846-2290 (F)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: system hangs for kernel 2.6.6

2004-06-24 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
To all:

Apparently I didn't cc the group. Thanks for all the messages. IN
desparation, I did a dist-upgrade. After that the kernel loaded without
incident. I hadn't upgraded for about two years (it's a node on a
cluster). 

Thanks again.

Art Edwards

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:17:25PM -0600, Arthur H. Edwards wrote:
 My system hangs at the message
 
 Setting up general console font...
 
 Has anyone seen this? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
 Art 
 
 -- 
 Art Edwards
 Senior Research Physicist
 Air Force Research Laboratory
 Electronics Foundations Branch
 KAFB, New Mexico
 
 (505) 853-6042 (v)
 (505) 846-2290 (f)
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
Art Edwards
Senior Research Physicist
Air Force Research Laboratory
Electronics Foundations Branch
KAFB, New Mexico

(505) 853-6042 (v)
(505) 846-2290 (f)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



unsubscribe

2004-06-24 Thread Arthur H. Edwards

-- 
Art Edwards
Senior Research Physicist
Air Force Research Laboratory
Electronics Foundations Branch
KAFB, New Mexico

(505) 853-6042 (v)
(505) 846-2290 (f)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



system hangs for kernel 2.6.6

2004-06-23 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
My system hangs at the message

Setting up general console font...

Has anyone seen this? Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Art 

-- 
Art Edwards
Senior Research Physicist
Air Force Research Laboratory
Electronics Foundations Branch
KAFB, New Mexico

(505) 853-6042 (v)
(505) 846-2290 (f)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: printing problem (mozilla 100% CPU)

2004-03-15 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
Just FYI, Netscape does not have the same problem. This is surprising,
as they come from the same code tree. Has there been any progress here?

Art Edwards


On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:16:55PM -0500, Ralph Katz wrote:
 Patrick,
 
 It's a bug.
 
 #213004: Mozilla runs away with CPU usage and freezes when trying to print
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=213004
 
 My solution was to use Mozilla-Firebird, which is a nicer browser as 
 well.  Happy printing.
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Strong encryption in Mozilla

2004-02-24 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
Does the Debian version of Mozilla support strong (128 bit)
encryption? I'm using Mozilla from the testing distribution.

Art Edwards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lost adobe fonts in Mozilla

2004-01-03 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I just upgraded to testing and lost the adobe fonts in Mozilla. How do I 
get them back?

Art Edwards

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



base64 translation

2003-12-02 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I'm trying to decode an applefile ppt that is in base64 coding. I have
read that there is a utility base64-decode that might work? Because
packages is down, can someone tell me the appropriate package(s) to
read?

Thanks

Art Edwards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



subscribe

2003-09-30 Thread Arthur H. Edwards

-- 
Arthur H. Edwards
Senior Research Physicist   Adjunct Associate Professor
Air Force Research Laboratory   Department of Electrical and Computer 
Engineering
Electronics Foundations Branch  University of New Mexico
KAFB, New MexicoAlbuquerque, New Mexico

(505) 853-6042 (v)
(505) 846-2290 (f)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Very wierd behavior on new nodes

2003-01-07 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834
Under the 2.4.19 kernel, it depends on whether the job was spauned using 
mpi. If I start it on the node, it does not kill communications. If I 
start it from a head node, I can still ping. I have only tried the 2.2 
kernel job as a stand-alone. There it exits quite gracefully with exit 
139. Do you know what exit 139 is?

Art Edwards

Ron Johnson wrote:

On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 22:48, Arthur H.
Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834 wrote:
 

I'm having monumental difficulty getting a new set of PC's working. I 
had been installing a 2.4.19 kernel with debian on a MB with a via chip 
set, and athlon XP2100, a promise ide system. Debian semms to install 
correctly. However, when running large fortran jobs (under g77-3.2), the 
system would either die immedieately, or start running and then die. 
When I say die I mean that I can't login. I have backed off to a 2.2.20 
kernel and g77 2.95. Now the program dies with an exit 139, but the 
system stays up.
   


Can't login because your fortran program is taking too much CPU?

Can you still ping the box from another node?

 




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Very wierd behavior on new nodes

2003-01-06 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834
I'm having monumental difficulty getting a new set of PC's working. I 
had been installing a 2.4.19 kernel with debian on a MB with a via chip 
set, and athlon XP2100, a promise ide system. Debian semms to install 
correctly. However, when running large fortran jobs (under g77-3.2), the 
system would either die immedieately, or start running and then die. 
When I say die I mean that I can't login. I have backed off to a 2.2.20 
kernel and g77 2.95. Now the program dies with an exit 139, but the 
system stays up.

What is an exit 139?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libgtk1.2 and libgtk1.2-common

2002-04-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834
During a dist-upgrade apt-get failed to replace libgtk1.2-common because 
it couldn't overwrite

/usr/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/gtk+.mo

because it is also part of  the libgtk1.2 package. Do I have to remove 
libgtk1.2 and reinstall
libgtk1.2-common first? If I do alot of other packages get killed too. 
Any suggestions?


Art Edwards


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




ispell

2002-04-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834

After a testing dist-upgrade I lost ispell. The entire directory

/usr/lib/ispell

is gone. I have tried installing, removing and installing, purging and 
installing. So far nothing has worked.


Suggestions welcome

Art Edwards




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Recent upgrade killed my laptop keyboard

2002-02-28 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834
I'm running an ACER 342T under potato. I just did a dist-upgrade with 
ximian and debian in my sources path. Aftward, when the machine came up 
in gnome my keyboard was useless. I couldn't even use ctrl-alt-f2 to get 
a console. Has anyone else had this problem?


Art Edwards



USB in 2.2.19 kernel

2001-12-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834
I am trying to install USB support in the 2.2.19 kernel. I have a Belkin 
busport USB PCI card.
I have built the kernel with the usb-uhci module. When I try an insmod I 
get the following error.


theory:/lib/modules/2.2.19/usb# modprobe usb-uhci
/lib/modules/2.2.19/usb/usb-uhci.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
Hint: this error can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including 
invalid IO or IRQ parameters
/lib/modules/2.2.19/usb/usb-uhci.o: insmod 
/lib/modules/2.2.19/usb/usb-uhci.o failed

/lib/modules/2.2.19/usb/usb-uhci.o: insmod usb-uhci failed


While in /var/log/message I get

Dec 16 16:12:08 theory kernel: usb-uhci.c: $Revision: 1.237 $ time 
14:23:05 Dec

16 2001
Dec 16 16:12:08 theory kernel: usb-uhci.c: High bandwidth mode enabled


The error is little cryptic. Usually I have had to deal with IRQ IO 
problems in EISA cards



Art Edwards



Re: GNOME Mail Client

2001-02-18 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834

Brad Burns wrote:

 


 I use Sylpheed too, and I like it.


I find that Pronto is great - it can use MySQL for storing emails which makes
it ideal for huge amounts of mail from losts of mailing lists. Searches are
VERY fast!


At the moment I am using Sylpheed, and it's very nice.. I have not settled 
though, since I'm more of a console type, and if I can figure out mutt, I'll 
probably end up on that.

Thanks for all the suggestions everyone!




Where does one get sylpheed?

Art Edwards



Re: installing netscape

2000-11-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834


Re: SIS 900 NIC

2000-11-05 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
The problem is during the install. After I install the Kernel and during
the configuration of device drivers, when I try to install the sis9000
driver I get the usual error resonses

insmod sis900 failed



Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Rogelio E. Castillo Haro wrote:

 And what is exactly your problem?
 In the ifconfig step?
 
 Art Edwards wrote:
 
  I'm trying (very patiently) to do a network install using a system with
  an embedded SIS 900. I have tried to install the sis900.0 module without
  success. This is particularly frustrating because the card was
  recognized and used on the same box with the Caldera open linux
  distribution. Any help would be apreciated
 
 



Re: t-dsl

2000-08-02 Thread Arthur H. Edwards


I'm a bit confused. On a normal dial-up I have been using PPP and do have
a static IP address. If ADSL is using PPP what about DSL prevents PPP from
doing the same thing?
--
Arthur H. Edwards
AFRL/VSSE
Bldg. 914
3550 Aberdeen Ave SE
KAFB, NM 87117-5776



NetGear ea201 card

2000-08-02 Thread Arthur H. Edwards


I'm trying to install a netgear ea201 10Mps ethernet card on a 486 using
potato. Does anyone know which driver to choose?
Art Edwards
--
Arthur H. Edwards
AFRL/VSSE
Bldg. 914
3550 Aberdeen Ave SE
KAFB, NM 87117-5776



Re: Is Debian the last OS ?

2000-07-31 Thread Arthur H. Edwards


Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 11:09:28PM -0600, Art Edwards
wrote:
> If I am right, then to keep users, you should try to update kernels
in
> minor releases.
The kernel is upgraded in point releases when justified (an exploit
for example). However, there's no way Debian can release a new
major
kernel revision in a point release and still call it stable (think
about a "feature freeze" as to why this is the case).
More to the point, there's no reason a user can't upgrade the kernel
themselves!
--
Nathan Norman "Eschew
Obfuscation" Network
Engineer
GPG Key ID 1024D/51F98BB7
http://home.midco.net/~nnorman/
Key fingerprint = C5F4 A147 416C E0BF AB73 8BEF F0C8 255C 51F9
8BB7
 
 Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
The question was "Why is Debian the last, rather than the first, distribution?"
To a large degree your response is the answer. People brand new to Linux
eat kernels, they don't compile them. So, if you don't want it to
be the last distribution, perhaps you shouldn't expect them to compile
their own kernels! So, as usual, Debian has to know itself. It IS
the last distribution. It requires more than a newbie level of sophistication.
It also has large rewards. If Debian decides to change so that it is more
accepted by a larger audience, it should find a way to make the point releases
stable with the new kernels, and it should not be so exceptionally pure
about free/non-free. Regarding kernel updates, there could be two kinds
of test cycles. For a point release, you keep the same packages you had
with the last major release and test for stability with the current kernel
and the new security patches. For the major release, you keep the current
Freeze method. I would think, perhaps naively, that the point release test
cycles could be more rapid than the major test cycles.


--
Arthur H. Edwards
AFRL/VSSE
Bldg. 914
3550 Aberdeen Ave SE
KAFB, NM 87117-5776



Re: current Redhat user evaluates Debian

2000-07-29 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I am a very happy convert from Red Hat via SuSE to Debian. I will give
you
two disadvantages that spawn others. The release dates are infrequent.
Also, IMHO, the current religious war over the meaning of Free is not
serving the user base. It is apparently serving some of the more devout
developers. The most recent instance in which I felt a disadvantage was
when I had to log into a MS server over a ppp connection. The MS server
required an encrypted password before I could even start exchanging the
standard PPP information. It turns out that Red Hat has something called
ms-chat that would allow me to do this using Linux. I will really need
this tool soon so I hope that debian can refocus more on the distribution
and less on policy.

Now the good things. Probably the best thing about Debian is the set of
installation and upgrade tools. Also dbian package installation is, IMO,
much better than the rpm method. For installation, if you have a
reasonable web connection, you simply down-load five floppy images and use
them to start the process. After kernel installation, you attach to the
web and finishc the process. A utility called apt-get makes all upgrades
effortless. You simply issue the commands apt-get update and apt-get
dist-upgrade and the utility will rebuild your entire system on the fly.
Aterwards, you can upgrade the kernel. apt-get can also install individual
new packages from debian ftp-sites. It is nice because it checks
dependencies and brings down everything you need to install the package.
My final comment is about the installation itself. I prefer debian's less
automatic but more flexible installation. It makes many fewer assumptions
for you.

This, of course, is one users perspective.

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, John L. Fjellstad wrote:

  Hi,
 
 I'm a current RedHat user (started with Linux on RedHat because
 it was available at Fry's), and I'm currently evaluating
 Debian for a possible switch.
 
 Can anyone come up with a list of advantages of using Debian
 Linux over Redhat Linux?
 I would also love to hear any the weaknesses Debian has compared
 RedHat.
 
 Thanks,
 -- 
 John__
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
 icq: thales @ 17755648
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 




Re: mouse in X again

2000-06-19 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
In the XF86Setup session, did you specify a three-button mouse?


Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Kerstin Hoef-Emden wrote:

 
 Hi,
 
 obviously, I was too fast when saying, that the mouse works under X now.
 The problem I am facing: The second mouse button does not work. I
 cannot cut and paste. Is this perhaps caused by the entry Microsoft in
 section pointer of XF86Config so that XF86 thinks, I have got a 2
 button mouse?
 
 Since this is a Logitech 3 button mouse. Should I perhaps choose another
 protocol instead of Microsoft? 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Kerstin
 
 
 -- 
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: your mail

2000-06-19 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
What version of windows?

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834



Re: lilo problem (LI hang)

2000-06-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I had the LI problem on the first install of Linux. I believe that for me
it occurred because my Linux boot partition was too far (500MB) from the
master boot block. In that case, a boot floppy worked instead. 

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Thomas Guettler wrote:

 /usr/doc/lilo/manual on Debian:
   LI   The first stage boot loader was able to load the second stage boot 
 loader, but has failed to execute it. This can either be caused by a 
 geometry mismatch or by moving /boot/boot.b without running the map 
 installer. 
  
 
 sorry, problems with mailer, can't reply to original message
 
 -- 
 Thomas Guettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.interface-business.de
 
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: impatient upgrage question

2000-06-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I had been equally cautions/timid about upbrading to a nominally unstable
distribution. I have done so and , with a few minor annoyances, have been
successful. Here is my sources.list

# Use for a local mirror - remove the ftp1 http lines for the bits
# your mirror contains.
# deb file:/your/mirror/here/debian stable main contrib non-free
# See sources.list(5) for more information, especialy
# Remember that you can only use http, ftp or file URIs
# CDROMs are managed throught the apt-cdrom tool.
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian potato main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main contrib non-free

Note the non-US has changed format since slink.

A couple of cautions.

If you have a ps/2 mouse, make sure that in /etc/XF86config it appears in
lower case. Also, unless you like really BIG fonts, place the 75dpi fonts
in front of the 100 dpi fonts. If you have scsi drives do not use the
2.2.15-IDE kernel.

If you use fvwm2, you will have to change a few small items to make fvwm,
its replacement, work well.


Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834



Re: Huge font

2000-06-17 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I got help from this serve on the same problem. In /etc/X11/XF86Setup make
sure the that 75dpi fonts appear before the 100dpi fonts. 

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Glen Sawtell wrote:

 
 Hi,
 I am a new debian user and I have a problem which none of my debian-using
 friends have come across. It seems that some apps like netscape, GIMP, spruce 
 etc
 seem to be using a large size helvetica font for the text on buttons and input
 fields etc. It's quite annoying and I don't think it's normal, is there a font
 package I am missing or something similar?. Please help.
 Cheers,
 -Glen
 
 -- 
 
 Glen Sawtell - irc.t.o Project Manager 
 http://irc.themes.org - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: xterm

2000-06-13 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
You can alter the xterm box at least two ways. 

1. You can create your own executable that will define the xterm. I show
one of these below.

#!/bin/csh -f
/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm  -bg blue -fg white -bd white -fn
-adobe-courier-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-m-70-iso8859-1 -xrm
'xterm*pointerShape: left_ptr' -xrm 'xterm*pointerColor: black' -xrm
'xterm*cursorColor: red'  -sb -g 80x25+0+370  -title Stella 

Most of the items are self-explanatory

2. You can work with .Xdefaults and alter the standard xterm. Again, the
variables are fairly self-explanatory


Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, cls--colo spgs wrote:

 debs,
 
 
 in my potato box(es), my window mnager is icewm; my
 theme, liquid. 
 
 is there a way make the xterm box a see-through (to
 the background or to a background image)?  (in other
 words, do i have to use the white/gray box in xterm or
 could i use an image or a different color background
 for xterm boxes?)
 
 examples:
 
 http://icewm.themes.org/php/pic.phtml?src=shots/958844082.jpg
 http://icewm.themes.org/php/pic.phtml?src=themes/icewm/shots/948108418.jpg
 http://icewm.themes.org/php/pic.phtml?src=themes/icewm/shots/960512609.jpg
 
 i know it's not a debian-specific issue, but there may
 be a deb solution. 
 
 
 ia, t.
 
 bentley taylor.
 
 //
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: setting up multi boot system

2000-06-12 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I have set up several dual-boot systems (linux-windows3.1, linux-NT, and
linux-w98). If you have partition magic, I have had success shrinking the
vfat partition and creating linux partitions. However, if the linux
partition is far from the master boot-block, then you will, I think, need
to use a boot-floppy that points to the linux partition. There is an
option for this during the Debian install. The same is true if you choose
to put linux on a separate disk. Understand that you cannot run the two
OS's simultanesously without something like vm-ware. 

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, David Dodson wrote:

 Hello
 I've never run any kind of other operating system besides windows and I was 
 considering setting up debian on one of my workstations at the office since 
 its the only place I have computer and internet access.  I still need to 
 keep windows and absolutely under no circumstances can I have one of these 
 machines out of order.  It'll be my job.  So my question is, is it realistic 
 to partition my drive and set up debian and what not and still expect to be 
 able to use windows even if something weird is going on with debian?  I 
 would think that you would get an option on which drive to boot from before 
 either operating system is being used right?  Probably a stupid question but 
 I couldn't find an answer anywhere else.
 
 
 Kindest Regards
 -David
 
 
 
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: General Resolution. Copied and Pasted Message from Developers Archive

2000-06-10 Thread Arthur H. Edwards

I guess we have all been stewing over this. One unintended result may be
that Debian will look as though it is strong-arming people in non-free to
accept the GNU-idea of free software. That is, Change to our licensing
agreement or we will dump you from the Debian site. It must be understood
that, whether intended or not, Debian is a huge presence in the Linux
community. It is influential and it should be respectful of its influence
in ways that, say Microsoft, is not of theirs. 

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:

 The following is a message that I grabbed from the archives of
 developers' list, the ones with the power of vote about this or any
 other resolution. There are ideas here that are worth reading, so I
 decided to post it. Since it is in public domain, I hope Manoj doesn't
 mind.
 Antonio.
 %%% *
 %%***
 %%% *
 
 Hi,
 
 So far, we have always packages ``All the packages fit to
  package''. The only criteria has been that we be legally allowed to
  package software, and that some one finds it useful enough to spend
  the effort packaging it. Indeed, when we could not distribute the
  binaries, we created sourece only packages, or installer packages.
 
 It was, IMHO, a judicious mix of free software evengelism, and
  one of creating the *BEST* distribution, with all the useful
  software we could package. I could almost always find any software
  available out there already packaged for debian. We were the
  inclusive distribution, and we showed our comitment to free software
  by only bundling free software on our CD's, and our commitment to
  useful distribution and our social contract by packaging and
  supporting the other software that did not meet our guidelines but
  was useful to our users.
 
 I like the fact we can cater to people who like free software
  (never put non-free in your apt sources), as well as to people who
  just want a useful distribution -- and we can, gently, try to win
  them over to free alternatives wehre such exist. We offer a choice,
  we do not impose. We evangelize, we do not force.
 
 Those who think this does not help Debian obviously have not
  really thought it through.
 
 This GR is disturbin. It throws away the promises made in the
  social contract. It is exclusionary. It reduces the utility of Debian
  to a number of users, and thus would marginalize us into a non
  entity. And it makes us committed to the free distribution, as
  opposed to the best free distribution.
 
 I am not convinced that this is a good idea.
 
 manoj
 --
  As I was passing Project MAC, I met a Quux with seven hacks. Every
  hack had seven bugs; Every bug had seven manifestations; Every
  manifestation had seven symptoms. Symptoms, manifestations, bugs, and
  hacks, How many losses at Project MAC?
 Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Think-and-do fonts in potato

2000-06-07 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I have upgraded three computers to potato (2.2.15). On two of them, a
laptop and a desktop, fonts for Netscape and other applications have
gotten BIG. I have done some searching  to no avail. Has anyone had
similar experiences? What did you do?

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834



Re: Libré Software universities? (USA or Canada)

2000-06-06 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
Where is out here? There are universities that use UNIX platforms, and
most of these have GNU software.  

For what it is worth, I was on Faculty at a State University in Charlotte,
North Carolina (that should be specific enough) for ten years in the
engineering school. They had built a remarkably large network based on
sun-solaris boxes running afs. I chaired the computer committee and saw,
first hand, how a fearful faculty can destroy innovation. The standard
complaint was the the unix was not preparing our students for the working
world. Of course this was nonsense. But the consistent complaining led to
the introduction of large NT labs at the expense of the UNIX side. 

We had a system admin in CS that put together a really beautiful lab
filled with Linux boxes (yes, debian) that were connected to sun servers.
The result was very inexpensive machines that ran the sun-based
applications like FrameMaker faster than the sun boxes did and were dual
boot to satisfy the NT-weenies. However, the sitting faculty seemed not up
to the task of learning how to use them, so the idea never left the CS
department. 

At any rate, I'm fairly sure that you could use free software in any of
the really valuable CS courses there.  

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834



Re: help!!!!!!

2000-05-29 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
The responses you have received are correct, though a little unforgivving.
I started with other distributions that had nominaly easier installations
but switched to Debian because of its continued flexibility. Take very
seriously the use of this and other lists (including the bug-list). They
are typically much more responsive than telephone numbers. I have posted
questions and have had answers within 15 minutes (best case) and within,
say, one day (worst case). You will need to be very specific.

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Mon, 29 May 2000, John Archuleta wrote:

 To Whom It May Concern,
 
 
  I recently purchased your version of linux, but am having trouble 
 installing it.  I was hoping you had tech support that could walk me through 
 it.  I would appreciate it if you could send me this phone number. Thanks!
 
 Sincerely,
 John A.
 
 
 
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: Problems with TeTex

2000-05-28 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
I had this problem also. There is a fixed version in proposed updates. I
compiled from sources and had no problem.


Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834



Re: Second Best - was Re: Best Hardware

2000-05-28 Thread Arthur H. Edwards
MTC

Linux gives the best of all worlds as long as Debian thrives. With all the
new distros with 'EASY' (read restrictive) installations that are targeted
to new users we
will get more driver and software support. Debian will allow us to have
maximal control over our systems because it does not include a terminal
GUI.

Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108

(505) 256-0834

On Sun, 28 May 2000, Rob Lilley wrote:

 
 Bart Szszka wrote:
 
 Well see, that's what I mean. There's hardware that is great on Windows, but 
 there just aren't any drivers for it in Linux. Or sometimes the second best 
 hardware for Windows ends up being the best option for Linux simply because
 the drivers are more complete.
 
 
 I had never thought of it like that but Bart is right.  Many of us using 
 Linux would be producing drivers for cheaper and therefore, older equipment.  
 This is because Linux and it's users have not been franchised like those 
 using Microsoft.  Microsoft has a vast corporate base buying it's products.  
 Therefore, hardware vendors have been writing for or bundling Bill's OS in 
 with their products.  Till now.
 
 I am switching our LAN at work from Windows NT 4 to Debian Linux with the 
 help of one of the Debian gurus.  I am lucky I work for a company that 
 affords me the opportunity to build a server from scratch with no monetary 
 restrictions.
 
 As more of us do this, more drivers will be written for the newer, more 
 expensive hardware beyond the reach of the average home Linux user.  Hardware 
 companies will want to insure drivers are available for Linux because of 
 Linux's growing popularity.
 
 But I think it is a tribute to Linux that it is growing, not with corporate 
 bucks and big equipment - but with people who know their stuff and not 
 motivated by money.  The best equipment, well, it's the stuff within reach 
 that gets the job done.  Lets face it, there is something in the fact that 
 Linux *will* run on a 386.  Try that with Windows NT!  Just my two cents. 
  
 
 Rob