Re: /etc/nsswitch.conf

2004-01-23 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:50:21AM -0500, Mauricio wrote:
   Could anyone post/send me a copy of an umodified 
 /etc/nsswitch.conf (as in you just finished the installation or has 
 not touched it yet)?  Thanks!

# dpkg -S /etc/nsswitch.conf
base-files: /etc/nsswitch.conf

So you can download the package base-files and do:

dpkg-deb --extract base-files.deb /tmp/myfiles

Then copy the nsswitch.conf from /tmp/myfiles/etc/nsswitch.conf



-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: en_CA? [was Re: www.gnu.org, glibcbug, bug@gnu.org, dpkg-reconfigure locales]

2004-01-07 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:08:22PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:01PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
  
  I don't know, no, no, and yes.  US does mo/day/yr, we do day/mo/yr
  (when we're not doing -mm-dd (iso).  Are spelling dictionaries
  affected by locale?  Dunno.
 
 Oi, the date format is endlessly confusing if you're American and you 
 happen to prefer the non-American way, *and* do computers enough to 
 think in the iso way.
 
 My most recent rent check, which I wrote last week on the 3rd of 
 January, I wrote 04 Jan 03, saw how messed up that was, and scribbled 
 a litle 20 in front of the 04.  My landlady came by and thought I'd 
 written the year wrong :-)

Can you guys take me off the Cc list? I haven't maintained glibc in over
a year. Best bet is to carry this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package signatures tools

2003-07-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:47:10PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
 I'm releasing these things now... have them in development and use for
 a couple weeks/months now.
 
 A Python module for doing debsigs-type package signatures and
 verification thereof.  Uses and included module for GnuPG file
 signatures and verification.
 
 It also includes a miniscript that, given a .changes file, signs the
 .deb, the .dsc and the .changes file (with the md5s in .changes
 adjusted).
 
jerhard.org/files/python-debsigs-snapshot.tar.gz

Is this based on debsigs and debsigs-verify?


-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package signatures tools

2003-07-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:47:10PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
 I'm releasing these things now... have them in development and use for
 a couple weeks/months now.
 
 A Python module for doing debsigs-type package signatures and
 verification thereof.  Uses and included module for GnuPG file
 signatures and verification.


Also, I think using any scripted tool to do the verification is asking
for security holes. It pulls in too many variables on which verification
needs to depend. The debsigs-verify tool does the verification and xml
parsing all in one C program.

What did you find wrong with the current tools already available and
documented? The only thing they need is policy to get them going. Dpkg
can already call debsig-verify to validate a package. It just needs to
be turned on.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: find utility gives segmentation fault

2002-06-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:06:53PM -0700, Larry Smith wrote:
 I've been having trouble with the find utility in
 Potato.
 
 Often, if I run find as root (so I can have permission
 to look in all directories), it will run awhile, then
 die with a segmentation fault.
 
 When this happens, I'm unable to do a normal shutdown,
 the system hangs during shutdown.
 
 I use the command:
 
 find -name filename
 
 Is there a known bug with find?

If the system hangs, that's a kernel bug, not a find bug. Does this
occur on a special filesystem, like NFS or /proc?

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Linux virgo wants USB rodent-support

2002-06-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:31:37AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi! I just finished my first linux install with 
 Debian 2.2r6 from CD.. It was pretty painful!
 I managed to do some mis-configurating and 
 X win had to be reconfigured by hand 5-6 times
 before I got it up and running. Exciting! BUT - 
 the mouse is not working!
 
 I have one logitech usb mouse (MouseMan Dual Optical)
 and one PS2 mouse (logitech marble fx). Neither of
 these work.

Did you install the module for either of these? If not (lsmod will show
you what modules are loaded), run modconf, and make sure all is
installed.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Connectix Virtual PC and the Tulip driver.

2002-05-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:10:26PM -0500, David Batey wrote:
 Hello
 I am trying to run Potato on my Win98se machine using Connectix Virtual PC 
 and everything is working even X with one major exception. My network 
 connection is not.
 
 Virtual PC uses emulated hardware.
 s3 trio 32/64 4m video 
 sb16 sound
 DEC 21041 network card (supposedly at IRQ 1 but connectix says that it is PNP 
 and has to use DHCP to get its address) my install says it is at addr 0108 
 and irq 11 but I still can not ping any addresses.
 It seems as if Connectix refers to Linux as RedHat and they site using the 
 autoprobe to configure the driver.
 
 Do I need to force my install to use IRQ 1 and if so how the heck do I do 
 that?..LOL
 Or am I using the wrong driver i.e. use the old_tulip? 
 
 Anyone else run into this?

I'm running Virtual PC under MacOS 9. My Debian install under that uses
the same Tulip driver with the same chipset. However, it is showing up
as PCI based (Not ISA PNP, which it sounds like you are). The driver
autodetects it as IRQ 11, and it works fine.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Netscape Browser Masquerade

2002-05-14 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:05:45AM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
 
 My bank's online account program only works with netscape classic, but
 recently they decided to only allow Red Hat 6.1 machines to access the
 program because they can support that version of Linux.  In other words,
 instead of supporting the browser, they support the OS they read from the
 broswer string.  Stupid, I know, but is there a way to masquerade my
 Netscape Classic browser to look like its coming from a Red Hat 6.1
 machine or better yet a Win95 machine?
 
 The account program only works with Netscape as well, not Mozilla or
 Opera, I already tried that.

Not sure about netscape, but with mozilla you can set a fake browser
string. I use it quite often (the info is in the doc directory when you
install mozilla-browser).

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what to install to get ldconfig..?

2002-05-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 07:57:20PM +0300, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
 (#:/work) dpkg -i libc6_2.1.3-20.deb 
 dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
 dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
 NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin.
 
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])(/dev/pts/4)(19:53:46)(Thu May  2)(6)(1)
 (#:/work) locate ldconfig
 doesn't find it.
 
 So, what do i have to install to get ldconfig..
 Sorry for being such a newbie.

Sounds to me like you upgraded to woody and then tried to go back.
Download the ldso package from potato and do:

dpkg --force-bad-path -i ldso.deb

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dpkg trouble again

2002-04-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:34:19PM +0200, Florian Struck wrote:
 Ok ill ask again like in my earlyer post where i didn't get any answer.
 Could someone be so kind and give me the list file for rcs? cause mine is 
 empty due to a crash while updating with dselect on sid.
 And now the package rcs is blocking all installation processes.
 I cant remove rcs cause dpkg doesnt know where the components are that are 
 included in that package, they are listed in the file: 
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/rcs.list
 Its just a tiny text file so please someone send it to me or tell me how to 
 solve that problem.
 Thanks
 Florian

dpkg --contents rcs.deb  /var/lib/dpkg/info/rcs.list

Either download the .deb, or look in /var/cache/apt/archives/

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: stoppling console logging

2002-04-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:32:33AM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
 syslog keeps sending messages to whichever console I happen to be on,
 thus messing up the display. Recently I started getting these messages
 every couple of minutes because of mailman:
 
 PAM_unix[24436]: (cron) session opened for user list by (uid=0)
 PAM_unix[24436]: (cron) session closed for user list
 
 How can I stop the *console* logging or at least get the messages to all
 go to the same console (prfereably #8) instead of following me around?


Restart cron in this case:

/etc/init.d/cron restart

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: X

2002-04-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:57:49PM +0100, Patrick Kirk wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:36:27PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
 Hi all,
   Somehow I successfully installed Debian 2.2r6 on my Ultra 5 sparc. But I
 having trouble in using X. Whenever I use X, I get the following error
 
 Fatal server error:
 No valid modes found.
 
 The whole error can be seen at
 http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~aravind/error/X_error
 
 Have you run the command Xfree86 -configure?  that should create a
 working XF86Config for you.

No, actually copy the XFree86 config sample file from
/usr/doc/xserver-mach64/


Ben

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Read: ????????:????

2002-04-08 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:43:44PM -0700, Dave Scott wrote:
 Anyone know where these messages are coming from.
 
 I got a spam notice for sending 4 of these messages out last night.
 
 But I didn't send them, although the header says they came from my
 computer.
 
 Kinda lost here.
 
 I checked for Viruses but none found.
 
 Is Microsoft Outlook the Culprit here.

Either outlook or exchange. I'd complain to your NT admin. There should
be no notifications sent unless explicitly asked for.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ultra 5

2002-04-07 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:25:57PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
 Hi all!
   I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
 5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
 
 1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it on CDs but the images
 seem to be larger than the CD size. So, I could'nt burn the CDs.
 
 2) Then I downloaded just the minimal CD image and burnt it on a CD. Then
 I inserted the CD into the CDROM drive and used the command $ boot cdrom
 to boot from the CD, but I am getting the error Bad magic number on disk
 label. So, I could'nt boot from the CDROM
 
 3) Then I downloaded the floppy image (rescue.bin and driver-1.bin) and
 tried to copy them onto floppies. But again the same space
 problem. The files are larger than the floppy disk size. Also from the
 documentation, I could understand that we cant boot from floppy drive in
 case of Ultra sparcs. Any suggestions? I think many of you were able to
 burn it onto CDs and floppies?

You wont be able to boot an Ultra5 using floppy. The OBP is buggy.

Try these images:

http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/

This will install woody. You'll have to read the docs on netbooting
(pretty easy).

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: What does this mean?

2002-04-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:07:09PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
 This is from /var/log/apache/error.log
 
 [Tue Apr  2 07:35:20 2002] [notice] SIGUSR1 received.  Doing graceful 
 restart
 [Tue Apr  2 07:35:23 2002] [notice] Apache/1.3.23 (Unix) Debian 
 GNU/Linux mod_perl/1.26 configured -- resuming normal operations
 [Tue Apr  2 07:35:23 2002] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: 
 /usr/lib/apache/suexec)
 [Tue Apr  2 07:35:23 2002] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: 
 sysvsem)

Means the apache daemon was restarted by a signal from the apachectl
program. Most likely because you upgraded the apache package.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Vmware not running anymore after dist upgrade

2002-03-31 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 02:55:28AM +0200, CASASSOVICI Alexander wrote:
 Hi 
 
 I had vmware running allright ..
 
 last week i had a dist-upgrade done ( it was kinda normal no kernel
 update nothing special) an .. i cannot power on vmware anymore
 
 here is what it says :
 
 VMware PANIC: (ide1:0) NOT_IMPLEMENTED F(831):692
 VMware PANIC: (VMX) AIO: NOT_IMPLEMENTED F(831):692
 

Change in the nice() function API. VMware has fixed this and should be
releasing (already released) an update for it soon.

-- 
 .--==-=====-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux   \
`   [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
 `---=-----==-===---=--=---'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CD Distro Creation

2002-03-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 11:42:11PM -0700, Troy Telford wrote:
 What programs (and documents) would I need to familiarize myself if I 
 wish to create a custom install set of Debian (unstable)?
 
 Basically, I'd like to be able to take a snapshot of what packages my 
 system currently has installed, and burn an installation set.

Check the debian-cd package.

-- 
 .--==-=====-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux   \
`   [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
 `---=-----==-===---=--=---'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mozilla issues

2002-03-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:32:22PM -0800, curtis wrote:
 One problem that bothers me with mozilla is printing.  I can't seem to 
 figure out how to add a printer to Mozilla, which might resolve this 
 situation.  
 
 Otherwise, my default printer is listed as PostScript/default and the 
 print command under properties is for lprng (I use cups).  So, basically 
 everytime I print I open the properties and enter just lp.  Then I can 
 print.  There has to be a way to permanently edit the print command and 
 to add printers. Could someone help me on this?
 
 Today, I noticed, however, that from some Internet sites it will print 
 only the first page, while from others it prints all pages.  Why would 
 that be?
 

Install the cupsys-bsd package, and tell Netscape to use the lp command.

-- 
 .--==-=====-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux   \
`   [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
 `---=-----==-===---=--=---'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unresolved Symbols in .../binfmt_aout.o

2002-03-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:43PM -0500, Michael Marziani wrote:
 Brand new 2.2r5 install.  I get this error several times on bootup, and
 if I do a depmod -e, I get:
 
 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.19/fs/binfmt_aout.o
 depmod: do_truncate

Ignore it. I doubt you are using the aout binary format (nothing in
Debian potato does, and no thirdpart software that I know of does
either).

It doesn't hurt a thing. You can always rm -f 
/lib/modules/2.2.19/fs/binfmt_aout.o
if it bothers you though.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: debianized vim

2002-03-18 Thread Ben Collins
 Conflicting code:
  augroup gzip
Remove all gzip autocommands
   au!

Remove all this junk, vim has this built-in now.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material

2002-03-14 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:56:08PM -0600, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
 Howdy,
  I think it is unreasonable. That's like saying that the library has a
  right to burn books that it finds filthy or innappropriate. If you
  
   Perhaps, but please go into your library and tell me how many racist books 
 are in there. I would be more than willing to bet that your average library 
 does not go out of it's way to include offensive books. 

Tom Sawyer?

  modify source code simply to remove the authors remarks, your are
  censoring, and are no better than a book-burner.
 
   So, if someone creates a program that has a button that says Please Click 
 Here, and that button initializes the hard disk, are we to assume the 
 package maintainer is not to edit it so to avoid infringing on Upstream's 
 rights (exactly how many rights they actually have when dealing with a 
 private project is on shaky ground).

You people have a hard time seperating technical and political aspects
of things. I'll leave you all to fight about issues that are older than
most nations.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material

2002-03-13 Thread Ben Collins
 
 Again,  there is no excuse for racism in Debian.  Other packages have
 elided the inappropriate material in the past, as they should.  An IRC
 client has no business being racist.  Debian is a distribution that
 specifically caters to children; note the debian-junior project.  As it
 stands, your package is inappropriate to be on the box my daughter uses.
 

IMO, the correct decision would be for the Debian Jr. meta package to
conflict with anything that may be offensive. We have things like the
anarchy docs, bitchx, sex, etc. etc. etc.

Don't start a trend that we cannot stick to. Unless you really feel like
perusing the sources of everything (grep -ir fuck in the kernel source),
you should drop this now. Yes it sucks. Yes, a lot of people disagree
with such remarks, but freedom comes in many forms (including allowing
people to speak such nasty remarks).



Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material

2002-03-13 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:25:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
 Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Don't start a trend that we cannot stick to. Unless you really feel like
  perusing the sources of everything (grep -ir fuck in the kernel source),
  you should drop this now. Yes it sucks. Yes, a lot of people disagree
  with such remarks, but freedom comes in many forms (including allowing
  people to speak such nasty remarks).
 
 I think it's reasonable for the Debian maintainer of the package to
 remove the comments from his version; it's really up to him (or a
 General Resolution or other override) to make that decision.

I think it is unreasonable. That's like saying that the library has a
right to burn books that it finds filthy or innappropriate. If you
modify source code simply to remove the authors remarks, your are
censoring, and are no better than a book-burner.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material

2002-03-13 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:42:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
 Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I think it is unreasonable. That's like saying that the library has a
  right to burn books that it finds filthy or innappropriate. If you
  modify source code simply to remove the authors remarks, your are
  censoring, and are no better than a book-burner.
 
 Um, it's free software.  When I package something, I get to warp it in
 whatever way I think is most suitable for Debian, and both my
 political judgment and my technical judgment are relevant there.
 
 You seem to be saying that we should treat *everything* as if it were
 an Invariant Section under the GFDL!?

No, I'm saying that using your values as a measuring stick against
whatever the author decided, is not proper.

Technical bugs are rather black and white. Either it is broken, or not.
You use your better judgement based on facts in the gray areas.

Changing some working simply because you are offended by it is just
plain wrong. You are making a decision based solely on your own personal
criteria, rather than that of sound technical advice.

IOW, you are comparing apples and oranges.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material

2002-03-13 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:58:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
 Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Changing some working simply because you are offended by it is just
  plain wrong. You are making a decision based solely on your own personal
  criteria, rather than that of sound technical advice.
 
 I think a Debian developer has a perfectly legitimate right to do
 this.  I'm certainly *not* saying he ought to in any particular case.
 
 There is no rule *anywhere* in Debian that one has some kind of
 obligation to give upstream authors an unlimited soapbox.  Indeed, if
 an upstream author insisted on one, we would regard that as a
 requirement thoroughly incompatible with the DFSG.

If an individual developer feels it's warranted, then by all means, they
can do so. But making it a Debian motto to do such is a bad idea.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: CVS Server on SSL?

2002-03-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:48:01AM -0600, hanasaki wrote:
 I have heard that pserver is not secure.  Is this due to plaintext 
 passwd on the net or exploits?  How can it be secured?  How can the 
 client and server be configured to run over SSL (Win and Lin)?

It is because of plain text passwords. Anonymous CVS over pserver is
perfectly fine though (unless of course the contents of your repo need
to be secured against plain text transmission aswell).

I strongly suggest using CVS over SSH. It's easy to setup. Just make
sure the server that your CVS repo is on has sshd installed. Then on the
client do:

export CVS_RSH=ssh

cvs -d :ext:username@cvs.server.com:/repo co myproj


Then, you can work as you normally would, had you used pserver. If you
want to avoid having to type your SSH passphrase for every access to the
server, then I suggest using ssh-agent.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: CVS Server on SSL?

2002-03-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 10:42:15AM -0600, hanasaki wrote:
 I think you are saying that nothing needs to be done, on the server 
 side, to support ssh?  Same port for tcp and ssh?

Right. Server side doesn't need anything special.

 Is tehre a way to do SSH CVS from Win?  WinCVS?

Not sure.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: CVS and SSH

2002-03-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:02:15PM +0100, Sven Gaerner wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I've got a (hopefully) little proble.m. I want to grant some people
 CVS access to my machine. They should connect by using SSH but I don't
 want to give them a shell. They should be able to use CVS with SSH but
 without logging in to my machine.
 
 Does anyone have an idea how to get this working?
 
 Please CC any answers to me because I'm not subscribed.

You'll have to setup an account for them. However, there is a way to
keep them from logging in (sourceforge does the same thing). Maybe
someone willbe kind enough to share that tidbit (which I'm sure either
has to do with setting a special shell for them, or setting up their
.ssh/authorized_keys, or maybe both).


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: /etc/passwd file, and USERSPEC.H

2002-03-09 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:10:40AM -0500, Mark Dascher wrote:
 OK.  Do you know how I would switch from the /etc/shadow aging info to the
 /etc/password aging info?  I already ran pwunconv, but it doesn't seem to
 unconv the aging information.  It's not too big a deal if you don't know
 how; I'm just trying to see what I have to do to make it work like the man
 page says.  :)

We don't support the old password aging. Why would you even want to use
un-shadowed passwords? You do realize it opens your system to brute
force attacks agains the password hashes, right?

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Woody: Relocation error when calling stat/fstat from shared library

2002-03-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 02:20:05PM +0100, Leif Thuresson wrote:
 I have come across a strange bug in woody when createing a shared
 library.
 If  I make a shared library and calls the glibc functions stat() or 
 fstat() from
 within my shared library I get a relocation error when I run a program 
 using my library.
 If  I don't call stat/fstat but only other glibc functions like open, 
 close etc.
 the program runs fine
 When I first noticed this problem I only got the error when I linked the 
 shared
 library with a version-script to only export the functions used by my 
 program.
 I then upgraded binutils from
 binutils_2.11.92.0.12.3-3_i386.deb
 to 
 binutils_2.11.92.0.12.3-6_i386.deb
 and now I get the error both with and without using the version-script !.
 I use gcc version 2.95.4 and glibc 2.2.4.
 
 I also tested and recompiled the shared library and program on
 a readhat 6.2 system at my work and there every thing ran without errors.

I bet you are using ld to link the shared library, instead of gcc.
That's bad, mainly because you miss the -lc and -lgcc links that gcc
automatically adds in.

Word to the wise, always use LD=gcc where gcc is available. Will make
you life a lot easier.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: upgrading to woody.

2002-03-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:19:40PM +1100, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
 newbie here...
 
 Just want to make sure I'm doing it the right way.
 If I want to upgrade to woody from potato...
 
 1) Change the apt sources.list to point to woody.
 2) dselect and just upgrade all the packages.

Personally I prefer doing step 1, and then:

apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade

If dselect makes you feel more confortable, then stick with it. Your
steps should get you there.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Strange E-mail Headers

2002-02-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:03:49PM -0800, Tim Grogan wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I've been paranoid after reading about people relaying through your e-mail
 server and spamming other systems.  I've tried to lock down my system to
 keep that from happening.  Today I got 2 email with these headers and I'm
 wondering if I didn't catch all the opennings.
 
 Tony Steidler-Dennison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I'm using sendmail and my domain is grocomm.com.  I also don't know Tony. A
 couple of times I've received messages with my domain appended to someone
 elses e-mail address.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

This bounce header is created by our list software. The short answer is
This helps us detect bounces. Not sure about the Tony header. Probably
someone who didn't setup their from correctly, and your smtp server is
rewriting it.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: /tmp size

2002-02-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:36:24PM -0800, Richard Otte wrote:
 I recently discovered that /tmp on my machine is rather small, around
 50mb.  I was trying to use xcdroast, but was unable to extract an audio
 cd to /tmp because it wasn't big enough.  This is strange, because I
 probably have 50gb empty on my hard drive.  I'm wondering if /tmp is a
 separate partition (is this my swap partition?) or why it won't use up
 the empty disk space.  I don't know how to find out the exact limits
 on /tmp, except by what xcdroast told me.

df -h /tmp

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: openldap 2.0.23 not writing to replica log

2002-02-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:35:15PM -0800, nate wrote:
 I have a woody machine running openldap 2.0.23 with
 the replog directive set to /var/lib/ldap/replog
 
 if i delete the files replog and replog.lock(0 bytes each),
 start slapd, and modify a record, the files are re
 created, both with 0 bytes again. is there anything
 other then the replog directive that tells slapd
 to write to this file?

Yeah, you need to define a replica. Slapd doesn't write anything to the
replog that isn't going to be sent to a replica.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Help!

2002-02-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 06:13:19PM +, Mark Sweeting wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 I know this isn't the place to ask this, but I have been trying for 5
 days to do this, and I am just having no luck what so ever.
 
 My question is, How do I unsubscribe from this list? A simple task
 you may think, but mailing the request email address and replying to the
 confirm email just tells me I am not subscribed!! Why then, do I get all
 the mail?

Check the headers of the email you get from the list. You should see a
line that looks something like this:

From bounce-list-your email@lists.debian.org

Using this you can deduce which email of yours is subscribed to the
list. To remove your self, since the unsubscribe message, but add on the
email address that is subscribed like:

unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Also, make sure this email address is in your mailers From line when
you send it (for the confirm aswell) just to be 100% sure.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: ARUGENT HELP!!

2002-02-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:16:25PM -, kevincrookes wrote:
 Right i have got a big big big big big problem. I have install DEbain Linux 
 onto the wrong computer. I currently have WInMe on hard drive (c:), and i now 
 have got Debian Linux on hard drive (d:). Is there anyway that i can 
 uninstall it?? If i cannot uninstall it, then how do i stop Linux from 
 Booting up as the main OS? Please can you help. Thanks
 

When you boot Linux, edit the file /etc/lilo.conf. At the end, add these
lines:

other=/dev/hda1
   label=windows

Now run the lilo program.

Now, when you boot you should be able to select either Windows or Linux.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: ext3 commit time

2002-02-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 04:38:09PM +0100, Daniel Faller wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am running the ext3 filesystem on a laptop. The default value for the 
 commit time of ext3 seems to be 30 sec, which is too short for the HD to spin 
 down. How can I increase this timeout ?

Use tune2fs (man tune2fs for usage).

 Has anyone experineces of bad impacts in increasing this timeout to several 
 minutes ?

I'd imagine the ill affects would be more likelyhood of losing data. You
know if your hd spins down in 10 minutes, and you set the timeout to 15,
it will be worse on the life of your drive, because of the constant spin
up/down. Journaling filesystems really aren't all that great for laptops
(maybe reiser or xfs have something to help this out, but I'm not sure).


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: .deb packages from outside debian/dists/ ?

2002-02-09 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 08:31:50PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
 I want to install some software that I downloaded as a .deb file, but it
 did not come from a Debian mirror. Instead it came from a ftp download
 from a developer's web site. The only way I have ever used dselect, dpkg, or
 apt-get have been to get stuff from a Debian mirror and then unpack and 
 install it. This happened all automatically. Now I have a file in my home
 directory. Where do I put it? What commands and options do I use?

dpkg -i blah.deb

 And most important - where are the answers to these questions in the 
 documentation?

dpkg --help
man dpkg
man deb



Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: file under /initrd/lib/modules doesn't exist for make-kpkg made kernel-- does not boot?

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:28:58AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
 I can't get a make-kpkg kernel to boot. It can't mount the root fs. Note
 I am using initrd and compiled make-kpkg with --initrd. One difference
 I notice with the stock kernel and mine is:
 
 # locate ext3
 /initrd/lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3
 /initrd/lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
 /lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3
 /lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
 /lib/modules/2.4.17mfcf/kernel/fs/ext3
 /lib/modules/2.4.17mfcf/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
 
 
 Perhaps this accounts for the difference in behaviour, i.e. 2.4.17-686 boots
 but mine 2.4.17mfcf does not? Gives a VHS kernel panic message to the effect
 it can't mount the root file system. Note I am using ext3 on the root
 
 in the fstab I put in ext3,ext2 for the type.
 

Can it not mount the initrd root, or the main root? If it can't mount
the initrd root, maybe you forgot ramdisk/initrd support.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: file under /initrd/lib/modules doesn't exist for make-kpkg made kernel-- does not boot?

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:53:09AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
 
 
 On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
 
  On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:28:58AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
   I can't get a make-kpkg kernel to boot. It can't mount the root fs. Note
   I am using initrd and compiled make-kpkg with --initrd. One difference
   I notice with the stock kernel and mine is:
   
   # locate ext3
   /initrd/lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3
   /initrd/lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
   /lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3
   /lib/modules/2.4.17-686/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
   /lib/modules/2.4.17mfcf/kernel/fs/ext3
   /lib/modules/2.4.17mfcf/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
   
   
   Perhaps this accounts for the difference in behaviour, i.e. 2.4.17-686 
   boots
   but mine 2.4.17mfcf does not? Gives a VHS kernel panic message to the 
   effect
   it can't mount the root file system. Note I am using ext3 on the root
   
   in the fstab I put in ext3,ext2 for the type.
   
  
  Can it not mount the initrd root, or the main root? If it can't mount
  the initrd root, maybe you forgot ramdisk/initrd support.
  
 # grep -i initrd config-2.*
 config-2.4.17-686:CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
 config-2.4.17mfcf:CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
 
  
  while running 2.4.17-686 cat /proc/mounts gives:
 
  # cat /proc/mounts
  /dev/root.old /initrd cramfs rw 0 0
  /dev/root / ext2 rw 0 0
  proc /proc proc rw 0 0
  devpts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
  /dev/hda8 /var ext3 rw 0 0
  none /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0
  /dev/hda7 /fsys1 ext3 rw 0 0
  /dev/hdb5 /home ext3 rw 0 0
  /dev/hdb6 /potato ext2 rw 0 0

Do you have cramfs built into the kernel? If so, then it sounds like
mkinitrd is not copying the ext3.o module to the initrd image, which
means it cannot mount the ext3 rootfs.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: user homedir chroot jail..

2002-02-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 04:37:01PM -0800, Petre Daniel wrote:
 how can i deny to a user with shell access the browsing of /home ?
 thanx

chmod 711 /home

So they can go into directories they know about, but they wont be able
to do ls -l /home


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Enquiry for Sun Microsytem

2002-01-20 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:10:27PM -0800, D'bon Office System wrote:
 Dear Sir/Miss,
 I do have two Sun system would like to upgrade to Linux 
 enviroment..from the Magazine i found that the Debian is one of the web site 
 that can be use the Sun microsystem.. so i would like to know more about this 
 information and for my system is Sun system Ultra 1  Sun System Ultra 
 enterprise A11-140  A11-170, and i do contact for Sun system Help line and 
 then.. they ask me to request from your vender  that are your can support for 
 those above model ? and one more  i would like to know possible that i use 
 the debian linux OS and link to the Linux 7.2 for PC 
 Thank you for you kindly reply.

Please read the website (www.debian.org) under Ports. Also for
installation instructions see:

http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/disks-sparc/

(Look under the docs directory)

Both your systems should be supported.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Break-in? /usr/lib/telnetd, port 1037

2002-01-14 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 02:49:36PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
 I've got a Debian box (2.2.17, mostly woody) that I've just discovered 
 has a more-or-less hidden telnetd running on port 1037 as well as the 
 normal telnetd on port 23. I thought I had uninstalled telnetd (although 
 it's possible I forgot to remove it).
 
 I'm thinking that somehow I've been broken into.
 
 I've got a pretty good Unix admin (not Debian) here helping to take a 
 look at it, but so far she's not been able to learn anything definitive. 
 One thing she thought odd was the existence of the directory 
 /usr/lib/telnetd. And here's what one of the security gurus on one of 
 her security mailing lists had to say about it:
 
 
 There should not be a /usr/lib/telnetd.
 You have been hacked.
 This is NOT normal behavior.
 exacutables should never be stored in /usr/lib
 thats for libraries.
 There should also NOT be a telnetd user in our password file.
 ftp maybe NOT telnetd.
 /etc/services is just for mapping ports to services.
 You could delete it and everything in inetd.conf would still work.
 You just wouldnt get a nice port to name mapping from netstat;-)

/usr/lib/telnetd is where the wrapper is. That is supposed to be there.
The wrapper is to help prevent certain kinds of attacks.

Don't look at telnetd too closely. Most likely it is just a backdoor,
and the real security hole (that they exploited) is somewhere else.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: OT: Language War (Re: C Manual)

2002-01-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:44:17PM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
 
 Lo, on Tuesday, January 1, Ben Collins did write:
 
  On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:12:09AM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
   
Secondly, you can make this mistake with any language that allows
references (perl, python, and java all allow it). Just replace free()
with some other assignment that changes what a is, and ultimately you
change b, which referenced it, unintentionally.
   
   True.  That, however, is not a type error of the sort that I'm
   describing.  And, in any case, the behavior of the program in that
   situation is well-defined by the language specification.  This is *not*
   the case with C or C++.
  
  Of course it is defined. It says that after you free() an allocation,
  that the memory the pointer references is gone and using the pointer
  afterwards is undefined.
 
 No, the program's behavior is *NOT* defined.  If it were defined, you
 would be able to predict the exact output of the program.  Saying that
 the standard specifically marks the program as having undefined behavior
 does not count as defining its behavior.

Every programming language has behaviors that are undefined. Just
because in C it can cause a segfault doesn't mean the other languages
are any better. Show me one language that doesn't have some action that
is classified as undefined.

Documenting that something is undefined is called a specification. It is
there so you know that you cannot rely on certain behavior. If you
ignore that, then no language is going to help you.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: OT: Language War (Re: C Manual)

2002-01-01 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:15:26PM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
 
  most of the segfaults are because of the resource allocation mistakes,
  not because of mistaken types... at last that's my impression.
 
 Resource allocation mistakes (at least, the kind that typically lead to
 seg faults) *are* type errors, from a certain point of view.
 
 Consider the following:
 
 char *a, *b;
 
 a = strdup(This is a sample string);
 b = a;
 
 free(a);
 
 /* Much code follows here, none of which modifies b. */
 
 printf(%s\n, b);

Uh, for one, this wont segfault.

Secondly, you can make this mistake with any language that allows
references (perl, python, and java all allow it). Just replace free()
with some other assignment that changes what a is, and ultimately you
change b, which referenced it, unintentionally.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: OT: Language War (Re: C Manual)

2002-01-01 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 03:46:38PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 
 Well, I dare you to remove 'ld' or 'libc.so' and see how many programs
 run ;-)  I think it's fair to characterize required language libraries
 as part of the run time system.  Whether or not a program is statically
 compiled is unimportant, as the language library still performs actions
 at runtime that your program depends on, and which your program
 could not function without.  Among those things, might be checking
 array accesses and raising exceptions for range errors...

I assume you mean ld.so.

The fact is that the C library is not needed in order to use C (else
libc.so would require itself in a neverending loop). You can easily
write C programs that use nothing from libc.so/libc.a. You can't write
java, perl and python that don't need their runtime.

The Linux kernel is an excellent example of a C program that is
self-contained.

Think of libraries as conveniences, not requirements.

I would also point out that java, python, php and perl runtime are
written in _C_. It's easy to characterize an interpreted language by
noting that it's runtime executable is written in a language other than
itself.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: OT: Language War (Re: C Manual)

2002-01-01 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:12:09AM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
 
  Secondly, you can make this mistake with any language that allows
  references (perl, python, and java all allow it). Just replace free()
  with some other assignment that changes what a is, and ultimately you
  change b, which referenced it, unintentionally.
 
 True.  That, however, is not a type error of the sort that I'm
 describing.  And, in any case, the behavior of the program in that
 situation is well-defined by the language specification.  This is *not*
 the case with C or C++.

Of course it is defined. It says that after you free() an allocation,
that the memory the pointer references is gone and using the pointer
afterwards is undefined.

Saying it is undefined is as good as defining the behavior. Assuming
anything after that point is broken.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Virtual PC

2001-12-31 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:14:54PM -0800, nate wrote:
 
 quote who=David Edwards
  Hi
 
  I have installed Debian on my imac using Virtual PC, but I am
  having problems with X window.
 
  Do you know if Debian can run on VPC or will I have to change to
  redhat?
 
 what video chip does virtualPC emulate? i haven't used
 it myself. when using VMWare it uses it's own video
 chip which requires a special driver. XFree 4.1 includes
 support for the vmware virtual chipset, but without
 a driver on other systems only 16colors is allowed.

It emulates an S3 Trio32 PCI card. Either the S3 Trio driver, or the
SVGA driver should work. I have Debian running under Virtual PC, but
haven't tried X11 under it.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Top and PS stoped working

2001-12-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:31:30AM -0500, Matthew Kopishke wrote:
 A few weeks ago top and ps stoped working on one of our servers.  We get the
 following errors when we try to run them:
 
 Jekyll:/mount_points/md0/home/kopishke# top
 top: error in loading shared libraries: top: undefined symbol: kb_main_free
 
 Jekyll:/mount_points/md0/home/kopishke# ps
 /lib/security/.config/bin/psr: error in loading shared libraries:
 /lib/security/.config/bin/psr: undefined symbol: kb_main_total

Where did these binaries come from? If you put them there, then I say
you need to recompile. If not, I'd say you've had a rootkit installed.

In fact, I just did a search for that file on google, and it is a
rootkit.

Take precautionary measures, quick.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: why not put pine in non-free?

2001-12-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 04:00:58PM -0500, Alec wrote:
 Why not put pine in non-free? Other distributions ship with pine...

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE read the past threads on this. You cannot ship
modified versions of pine binaries. Building pine without modification
on Debian will leave it broken in some cases (depending on how you use
it), so it is pointless to do so.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: libc6 messed up, no success recovering

2001-12-10 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:05:48PM +0100, Scott H. Hawley wrote:
 
 # dpkg --x /mnt/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6*deb /mnt
 /mnt/usr/bin/dpkg: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2.3' not found (required 
 by /mnt/usr/bin/dpkg)
 

Make sure you are using a rescue disk that corresponds to your running
system (e.g. potato for potato system).


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Sparc Linux?

2001-11-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:37:35PM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote:
 
 
   A couple of us are playing with Linux on Sparc.  It's supposed to be 
 rather nice.
   
   We're currently playing with the Suse version because the guy who 
 started this heard the debian version doesn't work on anything better
 than a Clasic very well.
 
   Anyone running Potatoe or Woody on a 420/450 or something relatively
 new and powerful?

I don't know where you heard that, because Debian's main archive server
is an UltraSPARC 60 with 2 450Mhz CPU's and 1.5gigs of RAM. It handles
several hundred megs of new packages a day, including maintaining the
postgresql database of the archive layout and pushing the archive out to
several mirrors (again, on a daily basis).

I'd say that's a notch or two better than a classic.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: libc6 dlopen problem

2001-10-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:37:40PM -0400, Andy Wingo wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 I've been having a number of issues this afternoon with the dlopen() facility 
 on
 my debian unstable system. I didn't want to submit a bug report until I was
 sure, so here it is:
 
 $ cat test-dlopen.c
 #include dlfcn.h
 #include stdio.h
 
 int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
 void *handle = dlopen(argv[1], RTLD_LAZY);
 if (!handle)
 puts(dlerror());
 exit(0);
 }
 
 $ gcc -ldl -o test-dlopen test-dlopen.c  ./test-dlopen ./libalsa.so
 ./libalsa.so: undefined symbol: gst_bytestream_peek_bytes
 $
 
 This is crazy irritating. With the .so I'm testing, I load another library 
 that
 defines those symbols before they get a chance to be called. Isn't that what
 RTLD_LAZY is supposed to do? This used to work, I'm thinking it's a libc6 bug.
 
 Running this little test program on other machines works with the exact same
 code that produced libalsa.so, so I don't think it's that issue. Please let me
 know if this is my problem or someone else's, as I'm a bit frustrated right 
 now
 :-\ BTW, the same thing occurs with gcc 2.95.4 and 3.0.2.

Seems to me that gst_bytestream_peek_bytes might be used as part of the
libraries _init code. Which means RTLD_LAZY wont help it.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: pty-redir

2001-10-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:26:13AM -0400, Adam John Henry wrote:
 pty-redir seems to be an essential program used to establish
 a VPN using SSH+PPP.  However, it would appear that, for
 whatever reason(s), it has not been debianized.
 Unfortunately, I am unable to download it from its source:
 
   ftp://ftp.vein.hu/ssa/contrib/mag/pty-redir-0.1.tar.gz
 
 Could anyone please offer a solution to this?  I read
 somewhere that this program must be compiled, but I don't
 completely understand why.  Also, what is preventing it from
 being released as a dpkg?  I would like to get it from a
 source I 'trust'...

I have a Linux version here:

ftp://marcus.debian.net/pub/pty-redir/


-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: How do I find out what packages I have currently installed?

2001-10-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 07:59:19PM +0200, Kai Sterker wrote:
 Hello everybody,
 
 I've got a question concerning Debian I found no answer for in the
 manuals; perhaps you can help me:
 
 Is it possible to see what packages I have installed, so I can
 
 (a) download all of them in one go and
 (b) reinstall exactly those package after erasing all of my HD
 
 For example, if I make dist-upgrade, I guess only those packages are
 downloaded that are no longer up-to-date on my box, which might not be all.
 
 Even if all packages would be downloaded, I wouldn't know how to make sure 
 that all of them are installed when I do a fresh setup _without_ manually
 selecting every single package.
 
 
 For example, SuSE allows to save a package configuration (to a floppy disk
 among others). And when doing a new install, I can load that config from the
 disk, so I need not go through package selection again. Is something similar
 possible with Debian too? 
 
 Thing is, I'll have to completely erase my HD, and I want to minimize the
 time to setup everything to my liking afterwards.

dpkg --get-selections  package.list

Then, after you reinstall, you can do:

dpkg --set-selections  package.list
apt-get dselect-upgrade


That should do it for you. You may want to save some of your config
files in /etc, if you have modified anything special.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: configuration of kernel-images

2001-10-10 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 09:58:01PM -0400, tim wrote:
 
 How do I find out the compile configuration of a pre-compiled kernel-image? 
 Such as kernel-image-2.4.10-k6.

Look for the corresponding /boot/config-* file.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: package sig checking ?

2001-10-08 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:17:16PM +0200, christophe barb? wrote:
 le ven 05-10-2001 at 20:37 Colin Watson a ?crit :
  On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 04:15:00PM +0200, christophe barb? wrote:
   Is-it possible to configure apt-get to check package GPG signature
   before installing it ?
  
  You can install debsig-verify and change /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg to say
  'debsig'. There are very few (none?) signed packages in Debian yet,
  though, and IIRC debsig-verify causes you trouble if you try to install
  unsigned packages.
 
 Is it planned to require from a package to be signed ?
 If it's not mandatory it looks useless.

That's the plan, but we need a transition outline first. I've yet to
complete one.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: SPARC Station 5: how to find out what's the HW configuration?

2001-10-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 02:49:32PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
   I have a SPARC Station 5 with debian installed. It works fairly well,
 the problem is I have no info about the HW configuration (I got it on
 sort of garage sale from company going out of business (or moving, I am
 not sure which)).
 
   as of now it is working, but I would like to build a new kernel (it
 has one of the 2.2 series) and the problem is that I have no idea how to
 configure it. The current kernel is configured properly (scsi works,
 metwork works, sound does not work) but it does not use any modules.

Unless you know what you are doing, and are willing to expect some
serious stability issues, you'll want to stick with 2.2.x on any sparc32
systems. 2.4.x doesn't work aswell as 2.2.x on this platforma yet.


Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: crontab problems ...

2001-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:03:27PM +0200, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote:
 
 I noticed a strange things in my /etc/crontab which seems to be installed by
 the cron and maybe modified by the anacron package.
 
 Here is my crontab :
 
 crontab--
 # /etc/crontab: system-wide crontab
 # Unlike any other crontab you don't have to run the `crontab'
 # command to install the new version when you edit this file.
 # This file also has a username field, that none of the other crontabs do.
 
 SHELL=/bin/sh
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
 
 # m h dom mon dow user  command
 25 2 * * *  roottest -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report 
 /etc/cron.daily
 47 2 * * 7  roottest -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report 
 /etc/cron.weekly
 52 2 1 * *  roottest -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report 
 /etc/cron.monthly
 #
 crontab--
 
 What I think is a problem is the `||' if the file /usr/sbin/crontab exist the
 run-parts part will not be executed, and if it does not exist the run-parts
 can not be executed.
 
 I dont understand why the `||' are not replaced by `'.

It's /usr/sbin/anacron. If anacron (the at package) exists, it let's
anacron handle the execution of those parts. If it doesn't exist, (the
logical or ||), then it executes run-parts directly, since anacron
isn't installed to do it itself. It's correct.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: no single sid package updated in the last 3 days?

2001-09-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 04:00:28AM +0200, Mario J. Barch?in Molina wrote:
   Hi all.
 
   It seems that in the last 3 days no sid package has been updated. 
 When I run apt-get update it just bypasses all the sources without 
 retrienving any new Packages file.
 
   Does anybody why this is happening? Maybe a policy change or 
 similar? Jusk wondering... It was usual to have new additions, 
 updates everyday.

The main archive has been down for an upgrade to the raid. Should be
back up tomorrow.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/   Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux  \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Debian and Kylix open edition

2001-08-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:48:04PM -0700, MRZ wrote:
 I wondered - has anyone has made any attempt at installing the freebie Kylix 
 IDE?
 
 According to the PREINSTALL readme, all distro's should be 
 able to run it though only a few specific ones are auto configured 
 (patched?)-  a feature not present for Debian.
 
 But then it says that A bug in some versions of the glibc loader can cause 
 data
corruption during the dynamic loading and unloading of shared
objects..snipSystems which cannot upgrade to glibc 2.2 require
a patched version of glibc 2.1.2 or later.
 
 According to the test script included, everything else required I need
  is present so I should be able to run Kylix if I get/apply the patch.
 
 Can someone please point me to what I need.

For kylix, I would upgrade (atleast partially) to woody, mainly libc6.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Framebuffer support in kernel

2001-08-23 Thread Ben Collins
 video=matrox:vesa:443

I think you need to add:

append=video=matrox:vesa:443

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: How to upgrade stable - testing today, avoiding the libdb.so.3 bug.

2001-08-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:40:48AM -0700, tluxt wrote:
 Err,
 
 I think I would rather have titled that message:
 How to accomplish a fresh install of today's Woody system.
 rather than How to upgrade ...,
 because I the procedure I gave there (and want)  
 is about doing a fresh install.
 
 Of course, the answer is relevant to doing an upgrade of
 an existing system, nontheless, I suppose.  

Actually, to do a fresh install of woody, you download the woody
boot-floppies, and install woody. That's pretty simple, right? :)

I don't suggest upgrading to woody yet. Wait a day or two for the new
glibc and libdb2 to make their way into testing.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: How to upgrade stable - testing today, avoiding the libdb.so.3 bug.

2001-08-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:14:10PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
 Thanks Ben for your prompt reply!  :)
 
 --- Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Actually, to do a fresh install of woody, you download the woody
  boot-floppies, and install woody. That's pretty simple, right? :)
  
  I don't suggest upgrading to woody yet. Wait a day or two for the new
  glibc and libdb2 to make their way into testing.
 
 
 Yes, dl'ing and installing woody directly would be great, 
 if it would work.
 
 In fact, that is what I tried about a week ago,
 but I found, IIamC, apparently, a crucial file was missing,
 and thus that option is not at all possible.
 
 Perhaps I am wrong about this, but it seems that the 
 base file is not present on the ftp site,
 and that without that file 
 it is impossible to do a direct installation of testing.

You are wrong. Base is not needed for installs of testing (like it was
for potato and prior).

Check woody again. It is constantly updated from unstable.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Why is Debian lagging so much behind Slackware?

2001-08-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:13:51AM -0400, Gilles Pelletier wrote:
 
 Tell me, is this what's preventing the team from offering boot diskettes
 for Woody nearly six months after kernel 2.4 is out?
 

You are seriously ill informed, or you prefer to spread FUD. Boot disks
have been available for woody for quite some time. Checked...

ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-{hppa,i386,ia64,m68k,powerpc,sparc}

...lately? The other architectures are about to have boot disks aswell.
We are freezing base very shortly, and this is the start of a release.
This isn't about releasing in 20 years or even 20 months, this is about
progressing now.

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Why is Debian lagging so much behind Slackware?

2001-08-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:43:48AM -0400, Gilles Pelletier wrote:
 At 00:29 15-08-01 -0400, you wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:13:51AM -0400, Gilles Pelletier wrote:
  
  Tell me, is this what's preventing the team from offering boot diskettes
  for Woody nearly six months after kernel 2.4 is out?
  
 
 You are seriously ill informed, or you prefer to spread FUD. Boot disks
 have been available for woody for quite some time. Checked...
 
 ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-{hppa,i386,ia64,m68k,pow
 erpc,sparc}
 
 ...lately? The other architectures are about to have boot disks aswell.
 We are freezing base very shortly, and this is the start of a release.
 This isn't about releasing in 20 years or even 20 months, this is about
 progressing now.
 
 That's what I said to the nut in our group who's making the tests when he
 pretended some basedebs.tgz file was missing. I then made a search on
 Google and it seems that's it. The boot diskettes for i386 don't boot.

There are no base.tgz's for woody boot floppies. Some simple checks in
the boot-floppies docs could have told them that. The reason is we don't
need them anymore. The system is installed completely from network or
CD, or from a file called basedebs.deb (or something similar). The disks
do boot. Think about it, why would we upload a set of boot disks that
don't boot?

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Why is Debian lagging so much behind Slackware?

2001-08-14 Thread Ben Collins
 How the hell is Volkerding and his small pack managing to put out Slack 8
 with XFree86 4.1.0, kernel 2.4.5, KDE 2.1.2, GNOME 1.4, glibc 2.2.3,
 Mozilla, Galeon, Nautilus, ProFTPD, OpenSSH, OpenSSL, mod_ssl, mod_php...
 and all the usual utilities, hardly 3 months after Mandrake rushed out
 their broken down distro? Has anybody heard that Slackware isn't safe : ) ?

Does slackware have 5000 packages? Is it as well tested, and stable as a
Debian release? Does slackware support 10 architectures (like woody
will, and potato supported 6)? Can you upgrade a previous slackware
distribution easily to the current system or do you hope and pray, or
just wipe your system and install fresh?

You are comparing apples and oranges. Just because other dists are
releasing bleeding edge, doesn't make them any better (let's not forget
RedHat 7 and it's pre-release glibc and canabalized gcc-2.96). We prefer
to release stable systems, rather than try to flash version numbers of
some high visibility software.

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



libc6 2.2.3-10 and atexit() problems, interim fix available

2001-08-12 Thread Ben Collins
In about 20 minutes, you can download this package:

http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb

size: 3413348
md5sum: 7d4535a0bb44145b098751d6959c3679

It solves the problem with the missing atexit symbol. I'll be uploading
a 2.2.3-11 soonish.

Please refrain from filing further bugs :)

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'


pgpp5CqsbkQiq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: upgrade to testing (woody) -- failed

2001-08-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 01:28:28AM +, nestea wrote:
 hi all,
 
 tonight when i tried to upgrade a few boxes to woody, i received the 
 following error message.
 
 any idea?
 
 
 ---
 perl: error while loading shared libraries: libdb.so.3: cannot open shared 
 object file: No such file or directory
 E: Write error - write (32 Broken pipe)
 E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt
 ---

It's fixed in unstable.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: ldconfig can't stat Xaw3d

2001-08-10 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:56:56PM -0700, Mike Pfleger wrote:
 Hello.
 
 While checking some things on my system, I noticed something odd in the
 o/p of ldconfig -v as follows:
 
 # ldconfig -v | grep aw
 ldconfig: Can't stat /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d: No such file or directory
 libawe.so.0.4 - libawe.so.0.4.3
 libXaw3d.so.6 - libXaw3d.so.6.1
 libXaw.so.7 - libXaw.so.7.0
 libXaw.so.6 - libXaw.so.6.1
 
 Any ideas what's causing this?

edit /etc/ld.so.conf and remove the reference to /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: ldconfig

2001-08-07 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:06:56PM +0100, john gennard wrote:
 I have dselect in somewhat of a mess, having a number of programs
 'in limbo' (including libc6). Trying to downgrade libc6, I got 
 the same error message to that below - (this actual error was
 obtained by trying to remove a program I don't need to see if
 there's an overall problem with ldconfig).
 The paths are in fact correct.
 
 --
 # dpkg -r elvis-tiny
 dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
 dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
 NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin 
 --
 
 I don't know which program provides the command 'ldconfig'. Can
 anyone enlighten me please.

Sounds to me like you upgraded to libc6 2.2, and then tried to go back
to 2.1.x. You need to reinstall ldso. Download it from potato, and do
this:

dpkg --force-bad-path -i ldso.deb

That should fix your problem.

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: error message with libdb.so.3

2001-08-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:55:56AM -0700, Changkil Lee wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I tried to install my printer epson stylus color 860
 and I found that my system didn't have a printtool
 package.  I installed an unstable printtool package
 which caused me to install lots of extras as follows. 
 Later I found that there is a testing version of
 printtool.  I am not sure if this package is the
 right one for me though.
 
 The following extra packages will be installed:
   binutils cpp cpp-2.95 g++ g++-2.95 gcc gcc-2.95
 gobjc gobjc-2.95 libc6
   libc6-dev libprinterconf0 libsnmpkit1
 libstdc++2.10-dev
   libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 locales lpr-ppd pconf-detect 

Which version of libc6 do you now have installed?

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: do I need kernel header 686

2001-07-29 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:17:46AM +0800, Tao Liu wrote:
 Hi,
 if I have a celeron cup, and want to compile the kernel,
 do I need kernel-headers-686?

No, you only need the kernel source. Those headers are only useful if
you are compiling modules seperate from the main kernel source.

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: How to setup 100Mb/sec full duplex networking on Ultra-80?

2001-07-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:53:08AM +0200, Guenter Millahn wrote:
 On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Craig Ian Dewick wrote:
 
  On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Guenter Millahn wrote:
  
   Hello community,
  
   I have an Sun SPARC Ultra-80 running Debian/woody together with an older
   switch (LattisSwitch 28115 by Bay Networks).
   The Workstation has a standard hme (happy meal) network card.
  
   Something with the autonegotiation doesn't work, probably because of the
   age of the switch. I have configured 100 Mb/sec full-duplex on the
   switch, but the Debian box falls back to 100 Mb/sec half-duplex. Another
   effect on this box: After a reboot of the switch the connection is down
   until I remove the plug from the switch and plug in it again.
  
  It also depends what you're connecting it to. If it's a network hub
  (without the intelligence of a switch) it'll always default to
  half-duplex. If it's connected to a switch (whether it be a level 2 or a
  level 3 switch) it should default to full-duplex. At least that's how it
  behaves with Solaris, and the limited experience I've had with
  Debian/Sparc shows the same result.
 
 The switch is a level 2, 100Mb/sec, with full-duplex capabilities from the
 early days of FastEthernet networking. But the main question for me is, how to
 force the debian woody box to go to 100 MBit full duplex mode?

You have to use the ethtool program. If that doesn't work (as in it
gives you some weird ioctl errors), I'll have to get you an updated
version since that would mean you are using a 2.4.x kernel :)

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: SOLVED: How to setup 100Mb/sec full duplex networking on Ultra-80?

2001-07-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 05:32:20AM +0200, Guenter Millahn wrote:
   The switch is a level 2, 100Mb/sec, with full-duplex capabilities from the
   early days of FastEthernet networking. But the main question for me is, 
   how to
   force the debian woody box to go to 100 MBit full duplex mode?
  
  You have to use the ethtool program. If that doesn't work (as in it
  gives you some weird ioctl errors), I'll have to get you an updated
  version since that would mean you are using a 2.4.x kernel :)
 
 
 That did the job! Thank you. Indeed I have the 2.4.5 kernel.
 
 I grabbed the current version from sourceforge and built it.
 Will make a source package and submit it to the maintainer.

The current maintainer is quite busy, so I've been keeping the package
up-to-date lately. So just send it to me :)

What I'd like is a shell script wrapper that checks uname -r and
chooses the old 2.2.x ethtool, or the new ethtool, depending.

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Debian Issues!!

2001-07-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:51:14PM -0700, Jaimos F. Skriletz wrote:
 cash to spare) to begin this project, but little to my knowledge, I have
 spent the last three days reading though your FAQ's, readme files, etc
 trying to figure out how to get the image which should be a simple afair,
 yet failing miserabbaly and I have the following comments/complaints I hope
 you will at least consider about your system.

I agree with you on this one. The maze of questions that you are forced
to go through on the cdimage website is a royal pain in the ass. Now I
can understand that some people may need to be guided, but some people
just know they want the ISO, and don't care about trying to answer the
questions in such a way as to actually find out how to do that.

Maybe enough complaints will get this taken care of. I know that when I
call a company and get one of those Push #1 for foo, I really like
getting the option that just says Press 0 to speak with a real person.
This is what we need for the cdimages, a direct link to the ISO's.

Ben

-- 
 .--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: NO! chmod strikes!

2001-07-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:01:53PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
 
  So, does anyone have a way to recover using only shell builtins, for
  just in case there aren't any executable files left?
 

The sash shell (in the sash package) has built-ins for most of these
utilities (chmod, chown, ls, cp, mv and rm included).

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Getting more from the Sun4M ???

2001-07-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 02:34:50AM +0200, Guenter Millahn wrote:
 On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Ken Seefried wrote:
 
  Guenter Millahn writes:
   
   1) Is it possible to run the SCSI connection with a higher speed?
  
  There are SBus cards that can run faster.  I've got an SBus FWD SCSI drive 
  that makes a different. 
  
  Ken Seefried, CISSP 
 
 
 
 Sorry, Ken, for my unclear request: I wanted to know, if it is possible
 to use this old HW with 10 MBytes/sec both on SCSI controller and disk,
 e.g. by using a better SCSI driver in kernel.

A better SCSI driver cannot overcome the limitations of the hardware.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: need man 5 regexp

2001-06-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:00:49PM +, Pollywog wrote:
 I need the man page for regexp but can't seem to locate it.
 Anyone know where I can obtain it?  I searched the Packages page but could 
 not find it there.

You need regex(7), not regex(5) (section 5 is for config files et al).
Regex(7) is in the manpages package.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: openldap

2001-06-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:38:24PM -0400, Peter Kok wrote:
 Hi all
 
 Any one have experience to install and configure openldap in tarball?

Why not just install the package? If you need help installing from
tarball, then your best bet is one of the openldap mailing lists.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Triple Boot

2001-05-10 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 12:16:46PM -0400, Skinner, Reed wrote:
 Does anyone have any experience with a Debian/Win2k/Solaris setup on the
 same system?

I had WinNT/Solaris 2.6/Debian at one time. I used the WinNT boot loader
though. When you install Solaris, you should choose to install the boot
block on the same partition you installed it on. From there, you can
boot it with LILO, just like you do for Windows partitions.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: I have instaledl too many packages

2001-05-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:47:39AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi,all
   I am a debian newbie.I have installed too may packages.
   I  want to use 'dselect' to delete some,but show many errors
   I want to use 'apt-get remove filename' but not know exactly the
   filename,and there are so many package to remove.
   How can I  reinstall but keep the smallest base system  so that I
   not need to reboot and can use apt-get,deselect,netconfig etc.

I regularly do this:

1. dpkg -l  package.list

2. less package.list (find packages you want to remove)

3. apt-get remove pkgs

4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 as needed (I usually just remove 4 or 5 packages
   at a time)

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: which gcc?

2001-04-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:06:44PM +0930, David Purton wrote:
 
 just a quick question, but which gcc should I have installed?
 
 
 
 gcc
 gcc-2.95
 gcc-3.00

gcc is a set of links to gcc-2.95. They are installed together
currently. The gcc-3.0 package is only for testing. You have to call it
like CC=gcc-3.0. It is not used by default.

Some time when gcc-3.0 is stable, then gcc will be links to gcc-3.0
instead of gcc-2.95.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: glibc compatibility

2001-04-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:20:02PM -0700, David Steinberg wrote:
 
 Hi debian-user readers,
 
 Something I've been wondering for a while, and now I really need to
 know: how do glibc versions relate?
 
 I'm running testing, which I believe is based on glibc2.2.  Is this
 backwards compatible with glibc2.1?  If a program says it requires 2.1,
 should I expect that it will work?

Yes. Glibc is backward compatible. However, and app compiled against
glibc 2.2.2 will not run on glibc 2.1.3 (and sometimes not even on
2.2.1).

 More generally, if I have multiple libc versions installed, how does the
 system know which one it should be calling from any given app?   (I 
 realize that this is probably a fairly big question; a pointer to a web
 reference would be appreciated if its easier than answering.)

You cannot have more than one libc.so.6 installed at any given time.
Fortunately, you don't need to, because of the backward compatibility.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: /usr/src/redhat on Debian?

2001-04-22 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 05:30:12PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
 Hi,
 I was downloading the kernel source and found the following:
 
 ls /usr/src/redhat/   
 BUILD  RPMS  SOURCES  SPECS  SRPMS
 
 All the directories and sub-directories are empty. I'm using
 2.2r3/potato upgraded from 2.2r0. 
 
 Anybody know why the redhat directory is there?

Because you have rpm installed, which may be because you installed
alien.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: undefined reference to `atexit'

2001-04-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
 Can anyone offer a solution for this:
 
 gcc -pipe -L /home/olly/mypackages/eiflibs/eifpgsql/C -L 
 /home/olly/mypackages/eiflibs/datetime/C edbgen1.o edbgen2.o edbgen3.o 
 edbgen4.o -lgdk -lgtk -leifutils -leifpq -lpq
 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6: undefined reference to `atexit'
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

The libssl (libcrypto) was compiled with a buggy version of gcc. It
needs to be recompiled. The version in unstable and (afaik) woody, are
ok (2.95.3-9 or later).

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: making gcc work

2001-04-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:46:13AM +1000, John Griffiths wrote:
 
 ok i get:
 
 hello.c:1: stdio.h: No such file or directory
 
 hello.c attached to check i didn't get it wrong

Install the libc6-dev package.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: RFC: Removing SVGA support from Ghostscript packages

2001-04-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:47:16AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
 Hi *, 
 
 Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
 Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
 and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga support
 removed.

I think it'd be really nice if you could get framebuffer support, since
svga doesn't even relate to most of my systems anyway :)

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: login binary source

2001-04-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:20:59PM +1000, Langdon Green wrote:
 I am trying to create a boot disk from my debian 2.2r2 machine.  I have a 
 rootfs with all the basic binaries req, and another disk to boot from.
 
 It boots, Ok and loads the rootfs ok, Login prompt OK, When I type username 
 and password, it comes up with pam errors (ie can't find username and 
 password).  I checked out the pam site and I believe that the problem is with 
 the file /mnt/var/run/utmp (which i tried touch, cp dd to copy the file to 
 the rootfs).  Anyway, I have downloaded the source cd's for debian, and I was 
 thinking of recompiling the login binary without pam.  Where would I find the 
 source for login (can't find it on the cd's) and is it possible to recompile 
 without pam?   
 
 Can anyone think of anything else that I can do?

Sounds to me like you did not copy the /lib/security/ modules. You
atleast need to copy pam_unix.so, and make sure you copied
/etc/pam.d/login (and removed all lines that do not pertain to
pam_unix.so).

Or, you can just download the shadow source and recompile without PAM
support.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Linux Virus

2001-03-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:55:16PM +1000, Mark Devin wrote:
 Does anyone know anything further on this new W32.Winux virus.
 Check out this link:
 http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5329436.html?tag=st.cn.1.lthd
 
 Surely this virus cannot overwrite executables that require root
 permission? Or can it?

No, if this virus actually exists (and I doubt its true, or even
particularly threatening), it can only affect your files. Unless you are
in the bad habit of reading email as root, and executing random
attachments manually.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Linux Virus

2001-03-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:07:49PM +1000, John Griffiths wrote:
 At 10:00 PM 3/28/2001 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:55:16PM +1000, Mark Devin wrote:
  Does anyone know anything further on this new W32.Winux virus.
  Check out this link:
  http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5329436.html?tag=st.cn.1.lthd
  
  Surely this virus cannot overwrite executables that require root
  permission? Or can it?
 
 No, if this virus actually exists (and I doubt its true, or even
 particularly threatening), it can only affect your files. Unless you are
 in the bad habit of reading email as root, and executing random
 attachments manually.
 
 At this point the virus is just a proof of concept, no payload and no 
 replication existing only on the author's HD and the copy he emailled to the 
 anti-viral company.
 
 the proven concept may be used to do more interesting things.

The concept is still dependent on the user executing an attachment
(depending on their email client, which most Linux clients are smart),
and it can still only affect user owned files, not root (unless said
email is read, and attachment is executed, by root).

Anyone can do that. I can write a C program and send it to you that
emails me /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. You still have to be dumb enough
to execute it. That's not a virus, that's social trickery. Now, if it
emails itself (and remember with Linux there are several dozen email
programs, so finding the right address book format is pretty hard), then
it is viral, sort of, since you still have to manually execute it.

Yes, it is pretty nifty that it can run on i386-Linux and Windows using
basic asm. However, that is a very limited thing, and for it to really
do someting useful, it will need to do a lot more, and will most likely
be less able to run on both Windows and Linux from one binary.

IMO, this is nothing completely new or innovative. ASM has been around a
long time, even before viruses. It all boils down to people being smart
enough not to accept attachments form people they don't know, and
especially don't execute programs sent to you randomly over the
internet.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Linux Virus

2001-03-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:26:39PM +1000, John Griffiths wrote:
 IMO, this is nothing completely new or innovative. ASM has been around a
 long time, even before viruses. It all boils down to people being smart
 enough not to accept attachments form people they don't know, and
 especially don't execute programs sent to you randomly over the
 internet.
 
 Agreed up to a point. But all you need is one person to open it blind and 
 then the rest go out to the adsress book and appear (to the next recipients) 
 to be someone they know. which alters the balance somewhat.

Good point...kind of a the chain is only as strong as its weakest link
scenario :)

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: md5 passwords

2001-03-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:28:36PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
 Okay, I know how to tell pam to use md5 passwords, but has
 anybody actually done this after using regular crypt
 passwords? I have a number of accounts with existing
 passwords in /etc/shadow... what happens to them? I've been
 wanting to upgrade to md5 passwords for a while, but I'm
 afraid of totally hosing my system. Any input on this would
 be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Existing passwords will continue to work. When someone changes their
password, it will be encrypted with an md5 hash instead of DES. Nothing
will get hosed.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Linux Virus

2001-03-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:33:30PM +1000, John Griffiths wrote:
 t 10:29 PM 3/28/2001 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:26:39PM +1000, John Griffiths wrote:
  IMO, this is nothing completely new or innovative. ASM has been around a
  long time, even before viruses. It all boils down to people being smart
  enough not to accept attachments form people they don't know, and
  especially don't execute programs sent to you randomly over the
  internet.
  
  Agreed up to a point. But all you need is one person to open it blind and 
  then the rest go out to the adsress book and appear (to the next 
  recipients) to be someone they know. which alters the balance somewhat.
 
 Good point...kind of a the chain is only as strong as its weakest link
 scenario :)
 
 
 Also worth noting that the last few headline virusses on windows have done no 
 more damage than a user-level virus operating on a unix machine.
 
 they have been notable in the denial of service aspects of their replication, 
 and the cunning nature of their social engineering.

Arguably, there is less of a chance of that under Linux. Most people who
use Windows (like 99.9%) use either Outlook, Eudora or Netscape for
email. On Linux, the numbers cannot be used against it. If you target a
Linux virus for Pine, or whatever, chances are you wont propogate very
far. Trying to write a virus that works on most Linux email clients is
beyond the scope of a small viral program.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



known libc6 2.2.2-2 install failure

2001-03-23 Thread Ben Collins
Ok, it is now a known issue (since I've gotten 5 bug reports over the
past 2 hours). Please refrain from sending more bug reports, and remove
libc6-i586 or libc6-i686 to fix the problem, or don't upgrade until
2.2.2-3 is available sometime tomorrow.

Thanks to all those that did send bug reports.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: duplad? help for sharing deb package!

2001-03-08 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:43:17PM +0100, Stefano Peluchetti wrote:
 i have build a package for mplayer-0.11.pre24 that i think is in line with 
 the debian policy.
 I simply can't figure out how to upload it!
 do i have to get a user/pswd account?

Let's just ponder for a moment what would happen if we let anybody in
the world upload packages to Debian's archive

Now, let's review. Only Debian developers can place packages in the
archive. There is information on the website for this.

You can, however, simply post to -user with a URL for where people can
get your package.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: package

2001-03-06 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 03:10:26PM +0100, dko wrote:
 
 hello
 when i reinstall a package apt-get take configs i've made
 i'd like to reinstall a package with it's default config. how can i do that.
 i removed config files in /etc but it doesn't work.

dpkg --purge pkg; apt-get install pkg

Purge ensures that all config files are removed.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: [q] apt-get source ..

2001-03-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:55:57PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
 Andrea Vettorello [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Yes, two/three days ago, look in the mailing list of this week about
  trouble compiling gs (ghostscript) from source. I've forced the
  inclusion of the time.h header, and a couple of trivial change in
  the stp driver itself about some incorrect inclusion path.
 
 time.h you say?  I had kaffe break on that recently after I upgraded
 my system a bit.  Same kaffe source, same configuration compiled fine
 just a few days earlier.  From my change-log, I installed perl-5.6 on
 February 27 which upgrades libc6 and libc6-dev from unstable and then
 upgraded from testing the next day.
 
 I fixed it by adding a check for time.h in configure.in.
 
 Any chance that this is a bug somewhere in libc or perhaps in autoconf
 (don't know if that got upgraded :-{)

This is a bug in kaffe. Recent changes in libc6-dev were made (upstream)
to make the headers more standards compliant. This had the affect of
certain things that were implicitly defined when sys/time.h was
included, not being defined unless time.h was included. You need to make
this change.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: upgrading libc6 from 2.1 to 2.2 - trouble brewing?

2001-03-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:59:57PM -0500, Colin Cashman wrote:
 Tonight I tried to install the latest version of ssh onto my system, but I
 wasn't paying close enough attention to the dependencies. Ssh 2.5.1p1
 requires libc-2.2.1-2 or higher, and potato uses libc6-2.1.3-15.
 
 I have a vague recollection of problems running apps using libc-2.1 with
 libc-2.2, so I thought I'd ask the list since I'm sure at least one person
 has tried it. :)
 
 Should I expect any trouble if I simply upgrade to libc-2.2? If so, what is
 the best strategy to resolve those problems?

Upstream claims (and I agree from experience) that glibc 2.2.x is more
stable than glibc 2.1.x.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: mutt editor

2001-03-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 04:05:40PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
 Dear colleages of list,
 
 how can I change the default editor of MUTT. I want to change it from vi to 
 ee. I looked in the man pages and it seems that exist an enviroment variable 
 EDITOR for this, but I cannot find it.
 Ani help will be very welcome

In ~/.muttrc put

set editor=ee

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



  1   2   3   4   5   6   >