Re: for the love of GOD! SATA DVD Burner

2005-07-17 Thread Brian Pack
On Sunday 17 July 2005 09:54 pm, Mike wrote:
 roach wrote:
 SUPRISE!
 
 See somebody did answer. Now peel yourself off the floor and lets
  continue...
 
 I doubt very much that this is a problem with linux and relates more to
  your SATA controller chipset. Most chipsets assume that you'd only
  connect a harddrive and therefore only support harddrives.
 
 What is your SATA controller chipset? If you've got more than one kind
  have you tried on the other?
 
 BTW, I know this to be true because I wanted to buy a plextor CD drive and
 found out it was incompatible with my motherboards SATA chipsets :-(

 Amazing! My first response to this question out of all the times I've
 even brought it up! Thank you!

 lspci shows it as this;
 :01:0b.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD
 Technology Inc) SiI 3112 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 02)

snip

 I have 2 DVD drives, the burner and the DVD rom on my IDE controller. I
 just can't seem to find the SATA DVD burner which I believe is due to it
 not being there. I'm kind of lost but I *think* it is just ignoring that
 its there. By the looks of it to me, it looks like it should be
 detecting just fine, giving me my sd* that I can use with it. But None
 of that seems to be happening. And I'm sort of lost.

According to the July Maximum PC (page 62), There are issues with 3rd party 
SATA chips on motherboards when it comes to optical drives. The Silicon Image 
chip would be one of those. They did not have very good results with the 
Silicon Image 3112 or 3114 controllers. 

I assume you've visited this page? 
http://www.plextor.com/english/support/media_712SA.htm

You may need to tweak your BIOS to get it to work.

-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/darkaudit/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Upgrading to etch

2005-06-10 Thread Brian Pack
On Friday 10 June 2005 09:51 am, nullman wrote:
 i AM sure, that ..

 1. etch is the currently testing-Branch
 2. Testing was forked when sarge became stable (not so long ago ;-)

 - so Etch = Sarge + what changed in testing since sarge became stable

 When testing (etch) becomes more busy (new packages -
 gnome-transition, ...) it MAY be unstable for a short while .. but
 that was the case in sarge, too before it freezed.

 2005/6/10, Nico De Ranter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 15:33, nullman wrote:
   isnt etch currently only a very young fork of sarge ?
   - so IT WILL be as stable as sarge the last months !
 
  I'm not sure. Etch is likely to get the latest version of KDE, Gnome,
  Perl, python... soon which will make it very unstable for a while.

Then there is the changeover from XFree86 to X.org, which may break *lots* of 
stuff. :)

Any word on the timetable for this switch?

-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/darkaudit/


pgpZwnRLDrqix.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DVD: can't burn dual layer or at 4x

2005-06-07 Thread Brian Pack
Can't find my original thread re: this problem, but this is close.

I was having all sorts of errors trying to burn 8x media @ 8x. The burn would 
be physically bad, with blank bands, scorches, etc. Below that, they were 
fine, and 16x media worked @ 16x. I thought I'd tried everything, different 
media, burners, boxes, even distros.

I noticed my BIOS would complain at boot that the IDE cable for the burner was 
only 40-wire. Since I had almost none of this trouble on the windows side 
(except 16x media @ 16x speed), I disregarded it.

But lo and behold, when I switched to an 80-wire cable, all the problems seem 
to have vanished. I'm 3 for 3 in error-free burns at intended speeds thus 
far.

-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/darkaudit/


pgp5tu36aBhRw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Broken Konqueror?

2005-01-07 Thread Brian Pack
On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:21 pm, Carl Fink wrote:
 On a newly-updated Sarge system I'm now finding a totally broken
 Konqueror.  Trying to load any web page gives me the frightening
 message:

  Protocol not supported

  http

 So, a web browser that doesn't support http?  Odd.

This happened to me the first time I tried to run Konqueror after upgrading to 
3.3. I was running fluxbox when I upgraded KDE, and nothing from KDE would 
run properly until I logged into KDE at least once.

Once was enough. I haven't had any problems with KDE apps running in fluxbox 
since.


pgp350pcRF1S2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Obtain diploma degree

2005-01-04 Thread Brian Pack
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 02:42 pm, Alvin Smith wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 02:35 pm, David P James wrote:
  On Tue 4 January 2005 13:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I cant get into any of the university sites  Steve
 
  I don't know whether to laugh or cry...
 
  On a more serious note, how is it that this piece of mail got through to
  the list without having the usual debian-user unsubscribe information
  appended to the message? Is it perhaps a result of the message being
  sent in both plain text and HTML?

 I am sending this as html...  Let's see what happens!

HTML? Where HTML? No HTML here.

Just plain text on this kmail-running Verizon-who-is-blocking-European-email 
ISP box.



pgpaKfjErMsjt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Clarification concerning security of testing on a laptop

2005-01-04 Thread Brian Pack
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 06:26 pm, Kent West wrote:

 My personal opinion? Skip Testing and go straight to Sid. You have more
 chance of breakage (although it's been very rare in my experience (about
 3 years now)), but said breakage also tends to get fixed within hours
 instead of 10 days. Same for vulnerabilities. As soon as a vulnerability
 is found, if the developer/maintainer of that package is on the ball,
 the fix will be in Sid very quickly, perhaps even before it makes it
 into Stable. You also get newer toys to play with.

I like toys. :)

I may not have the hands-on experience with Sid that you have (replaced SuSE 
9.1 with Sid in July... 99:1 linux:xp usage since), but I also have only seen 
very rare breakages. I've even seen 'breakages' that weren't breakages at 
all, but new packages that weren't as forgiving of existing errors as older 
versions.

Case in point: The new Fluxbox 0.9.11. When I replaced my 0.9.9, the desktops 
would now jump two at a time when I used the scroll wheel. I thought it was a 
bug in fluxbox. Then I noticed that openbox was doing the same thing. 
Judicious googling got me to a page that said to check my XF86Config. 
Sometimes there are 2 separate listings for the mouse, and could be sending 
double inputs. I edited out the redundancy, and bingo! No more double jumps.

 I also make it a point to subscribe to debian-security. The reports almost 
always list fixes for both Woody and Sid.


pgp63Lvv9CmRl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: A list administation query

2005-01-04 Thread Brian Pack
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:23 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:37 am, Felixk Karpfen wrote:
  Having lost two mailboxes to the the Swem-worm flood, I do
  not willingly post my true address to any public forum.

 Munging is considered harmful, get your mail admin to reject viruses the
 right way.

 http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful
 http://ursine.dyndns.org/Rejecting_Viruses_The_Right_Way

After hearing some rather odd news about my ISP's approach to email virus 
protection (read: there is none... it's all on the user), this is probably 
one of the most important posts I've seen in a long time. Bookmarked those 
two links in a heartbeat. Thanks most kindly.

P.S. I like that 'if you munge your address, then the terrorists win' :)


pgpNmS6X7img4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Clarification concerning security of testing on a laptop

2005-01-04 Thread Brian Pack
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:32 pm, J.F.Gratton wrote:
 My 2 cents on this: I've been using unstable branches/testing for the
 last couple of years now, and only once did I see broken packages that
 stuck me there badly (you know, some combination of libc+perl+dpkg, or
 something that lethal). Even then, with some fancy pussyfooting I
 managed to repair everything without a fresh install.

 One thing I still don't like about Debian is the time it takes to get
 new versions of major packages, even on unstable or testing (think:
 Gnome 2.8). The other side of that coin is that the package maintainers
 DO keep their eyes on the target. Boy do they work efficiently !

I think the Gnome 2.8 situation was an anomaly. By that time Sarge was 
supposed to have been ready, and rumor was that 2.8 would wait until after 
the release. If Sarge had been on time, I'm guessing that 2.8 would have hit 
unstable much sooner than it did.


pgpaw9Vf42ab4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Package includes a .desktop but no /usr/lib/menu/{foo} file

2005-01-04 Thread Brian Pack
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:31 pm, William Ballard wrote:
 Freeguide packages a .desktop in /usr/share/applications
 but nothing in /usr/lib/menu, so I don't have a menu entry for it.

 I use fluxbox.  Is there something I can install which will
 automatically add a menu entry for this for me?

Menu. Then you can run update-menus from the command line when necessary.


pgpH4bf3KyhYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Package includes a .desktop but no /usr/lib/menu/{foo} file

2005-01-04 Thread Brian Pack
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:54 pm, William Ballard wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 07:49:47PM -0500, Brian Pack wrote:
  On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:31 pm, William Ballard wrote:
   Freeguide packages a .desktop in /usr/share/applications
   but nothing in /usr/lib/menu, so I don't have a menu entry for it.
  
   I use fluxbox.  Is there something I can install which will
   automatically add a menu entry for this for me?
 
  Menu. Then you can run update-menus from the command line when necessary.

 Running update-menus does not add a menu entry for this.

In that case it's a simple matter to add the line 

[exec] (foo) {/usr/bin/foo}

to your fluxbox menu file.

Of course, if you do this, you'll want to name the menu file to something 
*other* than fluxbox-menu, and change the session.MenuFile line in the 
fluxbox init file. That way the menu won't be overwritten when you run 
update-menus.


pgpNHqy3ryCL0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: bootsplash + debian Sid kernel 2.6.9 (initrd problem?)

2004-12-28 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 02:45 +0100, Gael wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have a debian-kernel 2.6.9 and I try to use bootsplash. The
 framebuffer is ok (vesafb 1024x768x16). Bootsplash works
 anytime but at boot-time (each console has a picture and the
 first console has an animation at shutdown-time.). However
 there's nothing during the boot on the first console.
 Here's what I've done:
   - patched the kernel with bootsplash patch
   - xconfig (no logo, bootsplash, vesa module, initrd)
   - dpkg -i ...
   - apt-get install bootsplash sys-rc-bootsplash
 
 I've tried different ways to include the picture in the initrd.
 Either with dpkg-reconfigure or with mkinitrd + splash -s -f
 /etc/bootsplash...  /boot/initrd... didn't work.
 I think that the picture is appended to the initrd but isn't
 read, the system seems to ignore what is appended. In particular
 the size of the initrd given buy dmesg isn't changed when the
 picture is appended.
 The important point is that after the framebuffer is activated, the
 system doesn't look for a picure. Here's mydmesg:

snip

 The important point seems to me to be that the initrd isn't read
 entirely:
 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 1512630 2004-12-28 13:05 initrd.splash
 
 So the size of initrd.splash is ~1477 while what is read is:
   RAMDISK: Loading 1444KiB [1 disk] into ram disk... done.

I had the exact same problem. If vesafb was compiled as a module, I got
a blank screen. If it was compiled statically, I got garbage. From my
googling the stiuation, it appears that there is a bug in the vesafb.c
code in the Debian package.

As suggested by even further googling, I replaced the Debian vesafb.c in
kernel-source-2.6.9/drivers/video with the one from the vanilla 2.6.9
kernel. Compiled it statically. I have bootsplash. :)

Hope that helps.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Windows vs Linux Functionality?

2004-12-25 Thread Brian Pack
On Sat, 2004-12-25 at 19:04 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
 On Saturday 25 December 2004 3:40 pm, Ed Sutherland wrote:
  Another example: multimedia,  
  such as playing MP3 audio files or downloading pictures from my 
  digital camera. 
 
 Not sure about the camera, but media of almost every format imaginable 
 is easy to play with a variety of players Windows users only imagine in 
 their wildest wet dreams.

So far I have found one, *one* multimedia function that I give more
points to windows. Searching out and updating ID3 tags for my mp3
files. 

With Musicmatch I can right click on a song, select super tagging/lookup
tags, and it will go onto the net and find the correct information for
the song.

I have yet to find a package for GNU/Linux that will do the job as
easily. Of course, once tagged, I'm right back with
XMMS/Juk/Rhythmbox/etc.

I tried a couple of months ago to install Musicmatch 9 with WINE, but
without success. Anyone get ver. 9 or 10 running with WINE?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: debian logo

2004-12-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 16:20 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 22:54 +0100, Olivier Régnier (yahoo) wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I'm trying to make a logo and i'm searching the name of the font used 
  for debian logo ?
  
  Can you help me please ?
 
 We can't: it's proprietary...

No it's not. You just don't know what it is. :P

Of course, if it were, wouldn't that make the logo itself non-free?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: debian logo

2004-12-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 16:44 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 17:38 -0500, Brian Pack wrote:
  On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 16:20 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
   On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 22:54 +0100, Olivier Régnier (yahoo) wrote:
Hello,

I'm trying to make a logo and i'm searching the name of the font used 
for debian logo ?

Can you help me please ?
   
   We can't: it's proprietary...
  
  No it's not. You just don't know what it is. :P
 
 Yes I do.  And I can pee farther than you can, too.

I'll go be quiet now... :)

  Of course, if it were, wouldn't that make the logo itself non-free?
 
 Yup.  I told them that using MS TT fonts was a bad idea, but they
 wouldn't listen. :(

Then it's not the font I thought it was, which predated MS by nearly 50
years.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: debian logo

2004-12-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 17:37 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 00:22 +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
  Hello!
  
  On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:54:09PM +0100, Olivier Régnier (yahoo) wrote:
   I'm trying to make a logo and i'm searching the name of the font used 
   for debian logo ?
   
   Can you help me please ?
  
  http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/logos/README?cvsroot=webwmlrev=HEAD
 
 Well, I *thought* I was joking when I called the font proprietary!

I enjoyed it. :)

Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and all that nice stuff.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Suggestions for DVD/CD writing software?

2004-12-06 Thread Brian Pack
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 17:53 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
 On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:26:01 -0600, Jeremy Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:40:38PM -0600, Rodney Gordon II wrote:
   On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:05 -0500, Ben Bettin wrote:
What would you all suggest?
  
   K3b, though not GTK/Gnome, is perhaps the best burning program for linux
   there is. Take a look!
  
  I second this app.  It also has the ability to disc-to-disc copy, as
  well as music CDs.  I haven't tried it on a DVD burner, but I would
  guess that it includes this capability as well.
  
  Jeremy
 
 k3b. I third that :-) I use it on a dvd -rw burner to burn both cds
 and dvds (data, music, iso images etc). Very intuitive and very easy
 to use.

And fourthed. It works extremely well as a DVD burner. As long as you
have the files in the VIDEO_TS folder or an ISO, it will burn videos
without a hiccup.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Unable to use scanner

2004-12-05 Thread Brian Pack
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 22:55 -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
 Rick Friedman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
  I have an HP PSC 2110 All-In-One (printer, copier, scanner  fax). So 
  far, I have not been able to figure out how to use it with Debian (Sarge).
  
  I ran the sane-find-scanner command and received the following output:
  
  found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x2911 [PSC 
  2200 Series]) at libusb:002:002
# Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be 
  supported by
# SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.
  
  I ran scanimage -L and received the following:
  
  No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
  check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
  sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
  which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).
  
  What do I have to do to get the scanner working? Is it even supported by 
  SANE?
  
  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  
  Rick
 Go to the sane website.  They list every scanner they support and
 have instructions on how to get it working.
 
 You could find your answer faster there then waiting for someone
 here who 'might' have the same scanner.

In a similar vein, I have the hp scanjet 4670. SANE knows that there's a
scanner there, but that's as far as it goes. At last check of
sane-project.org it's still unsupported. So it goes.

Probably should have been a good idea to cross-check that site as *well*
as the OfficeMax/Office Depot/Staples sites when I was looking for a
scanner in the first place. :P :)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Thanks to Kent West et al

2004-11-29 Thread Brian Pack
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 17:44 +, Brian wrote:

 My last remaining big headache was that my USB mouse wasn't working
 properly.  However, the mouse came with a PS/2 adaptor, so I plugged it in
 as a PS/2 mouse, and now it worketh fine!

That's odd. When I first compiled a new kernel, I had exactly the
opposite effect. USB mouse using the PS/2 connector failed to respond.
Even with the original kernel where it had worked just fine not an hour
earlier.

Thanks to scarynetworkguy from #debian, I was able to get my mouse back
simply by removing the connector and using it as a USB mouse.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


CD/DVD folders disappearing when rebooting

2004-11-23 Thread Brian Pack
I'm running Debian Sid.

When I booted into Debian, I will sometimes get the following message:

discover reports that /dev/hdc is a CD/DVD device, but it and /dev/hdc
do not exist.  Not updating /dev/cdrom0.
discover reports that /dev/hdd is a CD/DVD device, but it and /dev/hdd
do not exist.  Not updating /dev/cdrom0.
No CD/DVD drives found.

The drives work just fine, but I have to manually create the cdrom0 and
cdrom1 folders in /media.

Here's where it gets a little weird. If I boot to a different kernel
than the one I had been using when all the above was going on, then I do
*not* get those boot messages, and I do not have to manually creat the
folders. But if I reboot *again*, the process starts all over.

Currently running kernel 2.6.8 built from latest kernel-source package,
but this happens when booting into 2.6.7 or 2.6.9 as well.

Running discover1 1.7.3. Would it be to my advantage to switch to
discover?




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: CD/DVD folders disappearing when rebooting

2004-11-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 12:10 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
my original snipped
 
 Are those *other* kernels from the 2.4.x variety? if Yes, this does not
 surprise me.
 
 For the 2.6.x kernels:
 Are you running udevd? and is hal installed?
 
 If not that would be your first order of business.
 
 WARNING: udevd does require some hand holding, so be prepared to give it
 that. But once you work out the stuff... it'll be just fine!

All my kernels are of the 2.6.x variety.

Udev is installed, but I was having this issue before I ever installed
udev.

Hal is not installed. Should it be?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: CD/DVD folders disappearing when rebooting

2004-11-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 14:09 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
 On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 12:30 -0500, Brian Pack wrote:
  On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 12:10 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
  my original snipped
   
   Are those *other* kernels from the 2.4.x variety? if Yes, this does not
   surprise me.
   
   For the 2.6.x kernels:
   Are you running udevd? and is hal installed?
   
   If not that would be your first order of business.
   
   WARNING: udevd does require some hand holding, so be prepared to give it
   that. But once you work out the stuff... it'll be just fine!
  
  All my kernels are of the 2.6.x variety.
  
  Udev is installed, but I was having this issue before I ever installed
  udev.
  
  Hal is not installed. Should it be?
 
 Yes, make sure hal, udev, hotplug, discover are all installed.
 
 There is a question about whether or not you want to have the kernel
 manage the links or not (you should answer yes to it), I cannot remember
 which package asks it.
 
 Also, make sure that the ide-cd module is being loaded. Sometimes
 discover and/or hotplug don't quite get it done and udev never makes
 the /dev/hd* files nor do the links get managed properly.

I installed hal. Looks like that fixed the issue. Thanks a bunch. :)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Problem with installing gnome

2004-11-21 Thread Brian Pack
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 10:38 +0800, Lian Liming wrote:
 Pure Sid, or sarge/sid, or sid/experimental?  Maybe you have
 something lurking in your /etc/apt/sources.list that you forgot
 about?
 
   
 
 I am using Pure unstable Sid.

GNOME 2.8 is in the process of trickling into Sid. It has been suggested
that one treads carefully when trying to upgrade these packages because
there will be some dependency problems where certain packages haven't
made it in yet.

Case in point, when the libeel packages were first available, synaptic
wanted to remove almost everything else GNOME-related. I waited until
the next day, and enough packages were available that nothing needed to
be removed.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Off-Topic; was, Will debian Grow....

2004-11-16 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 19:49 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
 David Jardine writes:
  vi is the bee's knees.  Sod emacs.  aptitude is rubbish.  Stick to
  apt-get.
 
  Is that better?
 
 Much.  Let's have flamewars about things that _matter_.

Such as this: Sarge. D-I. Sarge. D-I. Think about it... :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: why debian

2004-11-15 Thread Brian Pack
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 17:51 +, Matt Johnson wrote:
  --- Mark Crean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  Steve Lamb wrote:
  [snip]
 
  Still, as I've just wiped off Debian in favour of
  SuSe 9.2, at least for 
  the time being, I've no longer a place here so am
  signing off.
  
 
 I enjoyed using SuSE. Great system... But I wonder
 what you'll do when SuSE 9.3 (or 10) comes out...

I ditched SuSE 9.1 after they couldn't (or wouldn't) fix broken
software. Specifically GNOME 2.6. Sometimes it seemed like packages
conflicted with *themselves*.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Can't burn CDs since kernel 2.6.7 - am I the only one?

2004-11-10 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:06 -0500, Colin wrote:
 Justin Guerin wrote:
  On Tuesday 09 November 2004 11:33, Alan Chandler wrote:
  
  I had the same problem using 2.6.6 and a USB DVD writer burning CDs with 
  K3B 
  as the frontend.  Switching to a CD writer, I haven't had problems.  I 
  don't have the DVD writer anymore, so I can't check it, and I have no idea 
  what was going wrong, but you should know that you are not alone.
 
 My problem is just the opposite.  I have both an IDE CD writer and an IDE 
 DVD writer.  k3b recognizes the DVD writer as a DVD writer ONLY (not a CD 
 writer) and recognizes the CD writer as a CD-ROM only.  I can't write CDs 
 with k3b but I can with cdrecord.  Weird.  I'm using 2.6.9.

Which version of k3b are you using? This was a problem up to v. 0.11.5.
Current is 0.11.17. Using the Debianized kernel from
kernel-source-2.6.8-4 or newer, and k3b 0.11.17, I no longer have this
problem.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: non-serious question

2004-10-28 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 17:46 -0700, Gilbert, Joseph wrote:
 Hey guys,
 
 Anyone have any suggestions for good games available on Debian?  What are
 some good resources for keeping abreast with what is happening in the Linux
 gaming world?  I know this is an oh-so-frivilous of a question for me to
 ask.  ;-)

Are you looking for Debian packages, or games in general? Unreal
Tournament 2004 supports Linux right out of the box. Enemy Territory
also has a native Linux installer. Then there's Doom 3. Although the
install is a bit trickier than the first two, it is also an excellent
choice.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: cdrecord permissions problem in 2.6.8

2004-10-21 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 23:02 +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
 Hello
 
 H. S. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
  There was a problem in 2.6.8 kernel where a normal user could not burn
  CD's using cdrecord. I experienced that problem and installed 2.6.7,
  which did not suffer that problem. I am wondering, is that problem
  fixed now? I am planning to compile the 2.6.8 kernel source package
  from Debian.
 
 There were some changes in the kernel, beginning with 2.6.8, which
 caused the problem. 2.6.9 seems still to have that problem, at least
 the version from kernel.org.

I haven't had any problems with cdrecord in the last couple of months,
since kernel-source-2.6.8-4. K3B still had device detection problems
prior to v. 0.11.15. If you use the debian package, you should be fine.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Parallel Port Scanner Support?

2004-10-08 Thread Brian Pack
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 23:06, Scarletdown wrote:
 I just recently hooked up my flatbed scanner to my system in hopes of 
 actually being able to use it.  It is connected to the parallel port, 
 powered up, and I have installed xsane as well as the sane plugin for 
 GIMP.  However, xsane is not able to see the scanner.  I just get a less 
 than helpful no devices available message.
 
 What do I need to do to get this scanner working?  It is an Info 
 Peripherals Image Reader Ultra, Model FB7.  The FCC I.D. is jsf-fb262, 
 which Google and Jeeves searches show it to actually be an Avision AV260C.
 
 Any ideas what drivers I need for this scanner, and where to get them?

Have you looked up your scanner model at sane-project.org? They have
lists of what is (and is not) supported.

I have a Hewlett-Packard scanjet 4670. On the sane-project list, it is
unsupported, but sane knows there's a scanner of *some* type hooked up.
That's as far as it gets, though. Not worried about that one, though.
Scanner wasn't hooked up for any of my projects, anyway.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-06 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
 
   --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can someone please explain why some packages might be kept back, or
  how I might find out?
 
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=aptitude
 
  Enjoy.
 
 Thanks for the tip, Thomas, but did you mean this problem has already 
 been reported, or that I should submit a bug report?
 
 If you mean this has already been reported, I can't find the bug to 
 which you're referring.
 
 If you mean I should submit a bug, I'm not convinced my problem isn't 
 my misuse of aptitude.
 
 I guess what I'd like to know is how to get more information about why 
 aptitude is concluding that these couple packages should be kept 
 back, to better understand whether the fault is aptitude's or mine. 
 Unfortunately I haven't managed to gather this, using only aptitude's 
 ample documentation.
 
 Could you please clarify what you meant, Thomas?
 
 Thanks again!

I don't think it's a bug. I see something similar with synaptic. It
usually happens after I update my lists and choose a range of files to
upgrade. The files kept back are the upgradeable files I have chosen
not to upgrade.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: nvidia driver: gl works, but dri doesn't!

2004-10-06 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 20:02, Tom Vier wrote:
 tia in for any help, i'm DYING to play doom3 on this thing.
 
 i've tried everything, checked the symlinks, etc. but dri just won't work.
 i'm running sarge using 2.6.8. i've tried the drm and agpgart as modules and
 monolithic. no difference. i'm using the 6111 nvidia driver (the latest).
 
snip

I use this page as my reference for installing the nvidia drivers:

http://myrddin.org/howto/debian-nvidia.php

And it says not to use dri. I have a 5900XT card, and it runs the Doom 3
demo just fine without it.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


udev and /dev/video1394

2004-09-27 Thread Brian Pack
I've installed udev, and I want /dev/raw1394 and /dev/video1394 to be
available as user to use my DV camcorder with gnomemeeting.

I have the lines

M raw1394 c 171 0
M video1394 c 172 0

in my /etc/udev/links.conf, which puts the entries in /dev. Permissions
are root only.

I've tried putting these entries

video1394:root:video:0666
raw1394:root:root:0666

in /etc/udev/permissions.d/udev.permissions, but it doesn't set them as
I intended.

I can get everything working by doing a chmod 666 to them, but if I can
get the permissions set correctly from the config/permission files, I
shouldn't have to.

Suggestions?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Mplayer and xine

2004-09-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 15:39, Keith O'Connell wrote:
 ~~~@''~
 ##
 

Oh come on, now. Tell us how you *really* feel. :)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: k3b: Could not start process Unable to create io-slave:

2004-09-22 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 11:14, Johann Spies wrote:
 On sid, I can not run kde programs like k3b or quanta.  Apart from the
 error message in the subject line, I also get:
 
 klauncher said: Unknown protocol 'file' 
 
 And:
 
 Could not find mime type application/octet-stream 
 
 And:
 
 No mime types installed.
 
 
 The following also appears:
 
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kbuildsycoca: ERROR creating database '/var/tmp/kdecache-js/ksycoca'!
 kbuildsycoca: Wrong permissions on directory? Disk full?
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Outdated database found
 kio (KMimeType): WARNING: KServiceType::offers : servicetype
 KDEDModule not found
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Outdated database found
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Outdated database found
 kio (KSycoca): ERROR: No database available!
 kio (KSycoca): ERROR: No database available!
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 72, expecting version 75 or
 higher.
 kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Outdated database found
 
 What is the remedy to this?

I'm guessing you're trying to run these from outside KDE, correct?

I had this happen when I upgraded to KDE 3.3, but tried to run the newly
installed apps such as Konqueror from fluxbox, where I was running from
at the time.

When I switched sessions to KDE, everything was fine from that point on,
even from fluxbox.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: cdrecord does not work as ordinary user in kernel 2.6.8-1-686

2004-09-17 Thread Brian Pack
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 16:26, H. S. wrote:
 Zachary Rizer wrote:
 
  
  This is a known issue. You need to upgrade your kernel
  to 2.6.9-rcX, or downgrade to 2.6.7.X.  Some details
  here: http://k3b.plainblack.com/index.pl/news2 (under
  Do not use kernel 2.6.8) or more at google.com, I'm
  sure.
 
 Under the same section on that webpage:
 Update 3: Be aware that kernel 2.6.8 also contains the memory leak which 
 makes it impossible to write audio cds, even as root.
 
 shudderrr ... o boy. I was thining of copying 3 audio CD I just bought 
 but was just putting it off till got some really free time. Good thing 
 here I delayed :)
 
 Okay, so if I now go home and install 2.6.7, should I expect any other 
 issues with it? I mean, does this kernel perform as well as the 2.4.26 
 or it lacks something there too?
 
 Thanks for your pointer,
 -HS

That news item hasn't been updated recently, but newer versions of the
2.6.8 kernel will burn properly when run as root. I've burned a few
audio CDs just fine when running a kernel compiled with
kernel-source-2.6.8-5. All were as root, though. Still can't as user. At
least, not through k3b.

There's a new version of k3b (0.11.16) out that fixes some kernel
issues. Just waiting for it to get to Sid. :)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: How to change the font size for the mozilla firefox interface?

2004-09-15 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 15:50, Carl Fink wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 10:58:11AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
 
  I have a related question: My fonts are too large
  (10pt, as opposed to my desired 8pt) in gtk-based apps
  until I run the gnome-control-center, and open the
  font properties, then merely close the box.  (I don't
  have to change any values.)  I have to do this every
  time I start X windows; and it's a real pain.  Is
  there another way around this?
 
 You don't specify your distribution.  I personally would submit this
 as a bug report.

Well, it's not a Debian-specific bug. This happened to me in SuSE Pro
9.1, and now I still have to do the same thing, and I'm running Sid.

If I'm in GNOME, I don't have to do anything. In Fluxbox or KDE, I have
to do the above.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: xcdroast

2004-09-10 Thread Brian Pack
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 19:24, Tom Allison wrote:
 I have the 2.6 kernel.
 using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart 
 burn itself...
 
 help?

What errors? Which 2.6 kernel?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Using DVD

2004-09-10 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 18:44, Carl Fink wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:04:35PM -0400, Brian Pack wrote:
 
  I ran xine-check after reading this thread and got a few [OUCH!!]'s of
  my own. I installed libxine-dev and they went away.
 
 Same here, but I think that's a bug.  Either xine-check shouldn't report
 OUCH when xine-ui works fine, or xine-ui shouldn't depend on a -dev
 package.  Am I misunderstanding?

Now that you mention it, I think both statements are true. Xine was
working fine when I ran that xine-check and got the OUCHes. Wish I'd
noted which ones they were, because I'm not too inclined to remove
libxine-dev to try to reproduce them. :)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Using DVD

2004-09-08 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 11:07, Alejandro Matos wrote:
 By the way: lsmod | grep ide-scsi doesnt gives me any result...
 
 
 On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:06:18 +0300, Alejandro Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The folder  /usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.0.0/ is full with files (plugins right?)
  
  i did:
  
  apt-get remove libxine1
  apt-get clean
  apt-get install xine-ui
  
  but the ouch from xine-check are still there, also, a reinstallation
  didn't helped :-\

  On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:36:37 -0400, Michael Marsh
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:14:06 +0300, Alejandro Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[OUCH!!] There are no input plugins.
 xine needs at least one input plugin, but none is installed.
 You should probably reinstall xine-lib...
 press enter to continue...
  
   libxine1 should install files like
   /usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.0.0/xineplug_inp_dvd.so
   If not, try xine-check's advice of reinstalling it.
  

I ran xine-check after reading this thread and got a few [OUCH!!]'s of
my own. I installed libxine-dev and they went away.

I've also been using libdvdcss2 instead of libdvdcss.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tux logo, Nvidia drivers, and framebuffer

2004-09-01 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 01:23, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Brian Pack wrote:
 
  On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 13:16, Alvin Oga wrote:
  On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Brian Pack wrote:
 
  I'm making progress. By adding video=vesa vga=0x317 I get a blank screen
  up to the point that X starts. That's not a problem for now, because I
  know I'm on the right track. I'm recompiling a kernel right now that has
  vesa included, and not a module, as well as console framebuffer support.
 
  the blank screen means you dont have the proper frame buffer defined
  ( same probelm as my stuff ... just need to tweek the various fb options )
 
  Once I get that, *then* I can start playing with the bootsplash patch.
 
  i'd do the same tests ( same kernel ) on machines that you know worked
  on other distro ( like suse-9.1 has splash by default ) so it should
  work for deb's splash too
 - not all mb and not all chipsets are the same :-)
 
  yup...  and when you're done .. you can come play on my brain-dead mb too
  with gazillion different chipset to see which works and which does not
  support tux on boot or splash
 
  I compiled a new kernel, with vesa included instead of a module, same
  for console framebuffer. Added video=vesa and vga=0x317 in menu.lst for
  grub.
 
  I've got Tux! :)
 
 
 But you won't be enjoying all the features that your vga card (Nvidia)
 is capable of. If the kernel has support for Nvidia include it too. Find
 the arguments required to pass to the Nvidia module. And try with that.
 You might get better results. I had the same on my Intel 815e chipset mb
 with on-board vga where I used Intel FB which rocks better than vesa.

Are you certain about that? The nvidia logo pops up when x starts, so
I'm pretty sure I've got the drivers running properly at that point.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Anyone getting debian forged headers in Email?

2004-09-01 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 10:20, Richard Lyons wrote:
 On Wednesday 01 September 2004 14:17, Rthoreau wrote:
  I got this in one of my spam accounts, and thought it was a little 
  weird. 
 [...]
 
 Yes, I've had a few recently.
 

I'd have to say the vast majority of spam I've received in the last
month was actually addressed to debian-user, and not my regular address.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Tux logo, Nvidia drivers, and framebuffer

2004-09-01 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 11:29, Anders Karlsson wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Brian Pack wrote:
 
 | Are you certain about that? The nvidia logo pops up when x starts, so
 | I'm pretty sure I've got the drivers running properly at that point.
 
 VESA FB != Nvidia FB != X Driver
 
 VESA frame buffer code relies on gfx cards having implemented an old
 'common' standard. If there was an Nvidia fb driver, you could probably
 get various extra features switched on for your fb console. Not sure
 there is an Nvidia framebuffer driver even.
 
 The X driver for your Nvidia card is a completely different kettle of
 fish. Besides, you can disable that Nvidia logo when X starts up. Have a
 gander at the README that comes with the Nvidia drivers.

On a hunch (following your suggestion) I replaced video=vesa with
video=nvidia. I've still got Tux. Suprised the heck outta me. :)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Tux logo, Nvidia drivers, and framebuffer

2004-08-31 Thread Brian Pack
I want to have either the Tux logo or a bootsplash screen at boot. I've
found a few pages that explain this, but each time I delve deeper I hit
roadblocks. I've been referred to kernel patches at www.bootsplash.de,
but I have no idea which package I need. 

I know I'm missing something here, but have yet to figure out what that
is.

I've got an Nvidia card, with drivers loaded, and running kernels 2.6.7
and 2.6.8 (switching between the two as needed due to ongoing cdrecord
issues).



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Tux logo, Nvidia drivers, and framebuffer

2004-08-31 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 11:28, Ruairi Newman wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:07:34 -0400, Brian Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I want to have either the Tux logo or a bootsplash screen at boot. I've
  found a few pages that explain this, but each time I delve deeper I hit
  roadblocks. I've been referred to kernel patches at www.bootsplash.de,
  but I have no idea which package I need.
  
 
 You should get the little Tux logo on boot if you're using frambuffer
 support.  If you have the kernel-source package installed, read the
 files in /usr/src/linux/Documentation/fb/

Like I said, I'm missing info. Like adding video= or vga= to the
menu.lst to tell grub I want to use framebuffer mode at boot. Google is
my friend. :)

I'm making progress. By adding video=vesa vga=0x317 I get a blank screen
up to the point that X starts. That's not a problem for now, because I
know I'm on the right track. I'm recompiling a kernel right now that has
vesa included, and not a module, as well as console framebuffer support.

Once I get that, *then* I can start playing with the bootsplash patch.
:)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Tux logo, Nvidia drivers, and framebuffer

2004-08-31 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 13:16, Alvin Oga wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Brian Pack wrote:
 
  I'm making progress. By adding video=vesa vga=0x317 I get a blank screen
  up to the point that X starts. That's not a problem for now, because I
  know I'm on the right track. I'm recompiling a kernel right now that has
  vesa included, and not a module, as well as console framebuffer support.
 
 the blank screen means you dont have the proper frame buffer defined
 ( same probelm as my stuff ... just need to tweek the various fb options )
 
  Once I get that, *then* I can start playing with the bootsplash patch.
 
 i'd do the same tests ( same kernel ) on machines that you know worked
 on other distro ( like suse-9.1 has splash by default ) so it should
 work for deb's splash too
   - not all mb and not all chipsets are the same :-)
 
 yup...  and when you're done .. you can come play on my brain-dead mb too
 with gazillion different chipset to see which works and which does not
 support tux on boot or splash

I compiled a new kernel, with vesa included instead of a module, same
for console framebuffer. Added video=vesa and vga=0x317 in menu.lst for
grub.

I've got Tux! :)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: compile time on 2.6.8

2004-08-31 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 15:10, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
 How long is it taking people who compile the
 2.6.8 kernel?  It is taking about 30-40 minutes
 on my dual AMD MP2100??  And I am compiling from 
 a Deb Sarge kernel-image 2.6.8-1-K7-smp?? 
 Doesn't seem right. Seems like I used to compile 
 in 5 minutes or less??
 
 Compiling on Debian Sarge.
 
 Lance

All my compiles of 2.6.7 or 2.6.8 take about 35 minutes on my P4 2.6
Dell.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Known file-sharing client

2004-08-26 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 15:31, Stephen Tait wrote:
 At 20:03 26/08/2004, you wrote:
 Hey
 Does anyone know a good filesharing program for linux besides xmule?
 greets dirk
 
 Depends what you're after...!
 
 There are a zillion and one BitTorrent (the only P2P I use now anyway) 
 clients available for Linux. One of the most popular, Azareus, is java 
 based, and works fine under Linux and windows. WinMX will also run 
 perfectly happily under WINE, albeit with some rendering errors (although 
 we got these in windows as well ;)

In addition to Azureus for Bittorrent, which I also heartily recommend,
there is also giFT, which is a daemon that uses plugins to connect to
Gnutella, OpenFT, and FastTrack (Kazaa). You have a number of frontends
to choose from, but I would recommend Apollon.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Error upgrading KOrganizer

2004-08-26 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 20:09, Thomas Adam wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:21:53PM +, Dave Bokan wrote:
  Hello,

 I answered this yesterday. You clearly have no ability to check the BTS.
 Please read here, and follow the subsequent threads:
 
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/08/msg03770.html

And not only that, the KDE 3.3 packages are still the RC, not final.
What's the harm in waiting for the actual release?




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: the Packages files should get to mirrors last -- no swarthy emails

2004-08-26 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 19:14, Dan Jacobson wrote:

 Or block your user from sending in the first place. I suppose we see
 .net .com .org are not safe to send to as there is no assurance
 anymore that a reply might not come from a bad country and not the
 United States.

And according to a study by CipherTrust, over 85% of spam is originating
from the United States. Guess I'll be saying my goodbyes to a few
people. :)




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Debian and KDE33

2004-08-24 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 01:20, John L Fjellstad wrote:
 Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  here is the current kde info from the debian site:
  stable: 2.2.25 testing: 3.1.2 unstable: 3.1.2
  although my unstable says: 3.2.3, so the site appears to a bit out of date.
 
 I think kde 3.3 has arrived in unstable.

I looked at the changelog for kdebase and kdegraphics, and they're dated
13 and 14 August, respectively. AFAIK, this is the RC2 release, not the
final.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


alternative to cdrecord?

2004-08-23 Thread Brian Pack
I've been hit with the issues between cdrecord and the 2.6.8 kernel.
I've tried running as root as some have suggested (off-list), but at
least for an audio cd, the results were less than satisfactory.
Actually, they were crap. A bunch of mechanical-sounding bloops where
King Crimson was expected.

For now, I've reverted to kernel 2.6.7, where my audio cds burn fine.

I could stay with 2.6.7. I could patch my kernel, but my confidence in
my kernel patching skills are low to nonexistent. I'm wondering if there
is an alternative to cdrecord that works with kernel 2.6.8 as it stands
right now.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: alternative to cdrecord?

2004-08-23 Thread Brian Pack
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 18:06, Marc Wilson wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:44:15PM -0400, Brian Pack wrote:
  I've been hit with the issues between cdrecord and the 2.6.8 kernel.
 
 The issues... what issues?

Haven't you heard? IIRC the kernel 2.6.8 plugged a security hole that
cdrecord used to function. Once the hole was closed, users could no
longer run cdrecord as they could in previous kernels. With the old
kernel, a user could potentially wipe a drives firmware.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: can't post to linux.debian.user solved

2004-08-20 Thread Brian Pack
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 08:01, Roel Schroeven wrote:
 Marco d'Itri wrote:

  On Aug 20, Tim Connors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Unfortunately, linux.* is not a bidrectional gateway, so the posts

  Fortunatly, linux.* *IS* a bidirectional gateway, unless your news
  server is misconfigured.

 Are you sure? This is the first time I've seen anyone saying it is 
 bidirectional. I've seen many people say that it is unidirectional, and 
 experimential evidence tends to confirm that.

After all the shenanigans of the past week, I've convinced the usenet
mirror (is that an accurate term here?) on Verizon is unidirectional.
Nothing I've posted there has made the list proper, nor the web
archives.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Untwist, adjust, and apologize

2004-08-18 Thread Brian Pack
Here I stand, hat in hand.

I reacted in an irresponsible and childish manner on the list recently,
and nearly made a move that I would have definitely regretted.

So in that vein, I apologize to the list, and the Debian community in
general. I flew off the handle, and I am truly sorry for any disruptions
my bad behavior may have caused.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


No list mail

2004-08-17 Thread Brian Pack
It's not an ISP problem. Too many ppl from too many ISPs are reporting
the same thing for it to have anything to do with individual ISPs. The
messages aren't *getting* to the ISP.

I'm pretty sure I'm still a list member because my posts aren't being
rejected out-of-hand. So we haven't had a mass ejection from the list.

Whatever the problem is, it is *before* the messages reach whatever ISP
they're headed to.

I emailed the listmaster on Saturday about this. To date, no response.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: USE THREADS, DAMMIT! Re: No list mail

2004-08-17 Thread Brian Pack
Ok... so it looks like going through the web archive is working, but who
the hell knows if anybody is going to read it.

So rather than helping to fix the problem, some have chosen to killfile
the topic. And now the people who are at least making an effort.

Mr. Metzler may not see this. Suits me fine. If anyone else cares to
tell him, let him know that he is personally responsible for driving
users away from Debian.

There is nothing wrong with the software, far from it. It is probably
the best distro I've ever used. But I've run into far too many people in
here and especially the chat rooms that make it all too clear that
newbies aren't welcome. That anyone with *any* question isn't welcome.

I'm not through with Linux, but I'm sure the hell through with Debian
proper.

Goodbye.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


OT: 48 hrs and still no list mail

2004-08-16 Thread Brian Pack
My posts on the usenet mirror aren't making the web archive, So I'm
chiming in here.

From what I've seen, it's multiple ISPs with the problem. I haven't
received any list mail since Saturday night, when the usual load is
hundreds per day. The usenet mirror is not showing it's usual load.

I haven't changed anything on my end. The feed just dried up.

There is no increased spam in my ISPs spam folder. The messages aren't
even getting *to* the ISP.

Since the problem is not unique to me or my ISP, I would be inclined to
look further upstream for the problem.





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Fonts, What Else

2004-08-15 Thread Brian Pack
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:01, John Lowell wrote:
 I'm having some trouble understanding the Debian way with fonts.
 
 I've installed the base packages plus X window system, fluxbox, and
 firefox. Firefox does not show in its menu certain fonts that I would
 think would be available to it simply by virtue of X's installation,
 that is to say helvetica, lucida, any number of others. Running
 fc-cache -fv, I don't see them either. No mention of the standard
 fonts whatsoever. What am I missing here, or rather what might the
 installation be missing?
 
 jlowell

I'm not sure, but I'd love to see the answer to this one as well. I've
been in the habit of running gnome-control-center as soon as I start
flux to get the font size I want. it's not as bas as when I was running
SuSE, but GNOME fonts outside GNOME were always much larger than from
within.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: rpm packages Debian

2004-08-12 Thread Brian Pack
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 14:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have 2 rpm packages that I want to install on a Sarge system. Can someone
 give me a hint or a link as to how to do that. 
 Michael

Try alien -i filename.rpm



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Debian-user] Re: FOSS

2004-08-11 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:36, Didar Hussain wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:16:55PM -0500, Mohammad Shadi wrote:
  which the software Redhat + Debian + SuSE + SlackWare + Mandrake is the best 
  software linux?
 
 These are all distributions of a Linux kernel with other software.
 
  which the software Redhat + Debian + SuSE + SlackWare + Mandrake to use as a 
  server operating system?
 
 Personal opinion: Debian for Server systems, SuSE is a very good 
 Desktop system. Mandrake is also very good. Slackware is for advanced
 users. Red Hat costs $$$ (lotsa money) to justify their product.
 
 
  which countries  the more choose and Customer for developments in countries around 
  the world and why?
  
 
 Sorry, can't understand what you are asking, could you please
 be more clear.
 

I can clear it up in one word: spam.

It seems 95% of the spam I'm receiving is actually addressed to the
list, not my home address. This is surprising since the list is mirrored
onto USENET with email addresses intact.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


What am I running now, Sarge or Sid?

2004-08-10 Thread Brian Pack
I did a network install of Sarge from this past Saturday's daily .iso.
After install, I added the unstable distribution to my sources.list and
upgraded a number of packages.

So my question is: did I turn Sarge into Sid? Or do I still have Sarge?




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: What am I running now, Sarge or Sid?

2004-08-10 Thread Brian Pack
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 17:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
 Brian Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I did a network install of Sarge from this past Saturday's daily .iso.
  After install, I added the unstable distribution to my sources.list
  and upgraded a number of packages.
 
  So my question is: did I turn Sarge into Sid? Or do I still have
  Sarge?
 
 Both.  You probably want to pick one:  Either move everything to sid or
 everything to sarge.

It's Sid. Upgraded everything except kernel-sources. Everything seems to
be running fine, if not a bit better. Apt even upgraded my nVidia
drivers without having to do anything with the kernel.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Duplicates my fault... sorry

2004-08-09 Thread Brian Pack
With a gentle prod from Alvin Oga, I figured out my duplicates
situation. In anticipation of receiving mailing list stuff, I'd set up a
filter to move posts into it's own folder. Then I set up a second one
when I saw that nothing matched the first one. Posts were duplicated
once they hit the filters.

I deleted the first filter, and no duplicates since. :)

Thanks Alvin for your help.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Adding Debian menu to windows managers

2004-08-09 Thread Brian Pack
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 12:40, Scott Thompson wrote:
 Both KDE and GNOME have menus full of links to all of the software installed
 on the system, including the Debian menu.  When I use any other installed
 windows manager, i.e. fluxbox, blackbox, enlightenment or xfce4, the menus
 are all empty.  How can I get at least the Debian menu to appear in
 enlightenment and xfce4 primarily?

Have you tried running update-menus? That's what was suggested to me by
the kind folks in freenode's #fluxbox channel. Worked just fine :)




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Duplicates driving me crazy

2004-08-08 Thread Brian Pack
A good 30% of the traffic I'm receiving on this list are duplicate
posts. Usually immediately following the original message.

What is going on here, and is there anything I can do to stop it?

I'm using evolution 1.4.6 if that's any help.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part