Re: ipfilter

2000-02-11 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,

I put OpenBSD on my firewall box a few months ago specifically for
ipfilter. As Phil Brutsche said the latest ipfilter port for Linux is
for the 2.0.x kernels, which is too old.

Pointless rambling..
I haven't looked back since moving for ipchains to ipfilter. My rules
for ipchains were like 30 lines or more and the ipfilter rules are less
than 10, mainly due to the fact that ipfilter is stateful (keeps track
of how/when connections we're initiated) while ipchains is not.

The nicest thing (among many) about ipfilter is I didn't have to open
any ports at all to the network except what I wanted (because it is
stateful). With ipchains I had to open 1024-65536 for general surfing.
Within an hour or so of switching to ipfilter I started seeing attempts
at certain high ports I had never seen blocked before.

Unfortunately as far as I can tell netfilter won't be any different than
ipchains, they just rewrote the code and changed the syntax.
...End pointless rambling

Chris Schleifer

P.S. I am by no means an expert on tcp or firewalls, so if I'm wrong
someone correct me please.


Bob Bernstein wrote:
 
 A thousand pardons if this has been a FAQ, but...
 
 Would someone be good enough to clue me in on the current status of the
 ipfilter package as far as Linux is concerned?
 
 I've farted around the net looking for stuff and I keep coming up dry. I seem
 to recall a kernel patch awhile back...?
 
 --
 Bob Bernstein
 at http://www.ruptured-duck.com
 Esmond, R.I., USA
 
 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: oracle 8i

2000-02-09 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,

It works great. There was nothing Red Hat specific as far as I could
tell.

There are a few tiny problems like the awk problem you discovered (just
link /bin/awk to /usr/bin/awk) and their script oraenv didn't work until
I'll fixed it. Also they install a few scripts in /usr/bin (oraenv,
coraenv) without asking, which is annoying on Debian. Other than that it
went well, unless I'm forgetting something.

I didn't install it on a production machine and I also installed the
standard edition, so your mileage may vary.

Chris Schleifer

Tiago Antao wrote:
 
 Hi!
 
   Does anybody has instaled oracle 8i ee in debian? I'd really prefer to
 install it in debian, but the docs talk about redhat only, and I'm a bit
 afraid of installing a production oracle on debian. I've already tried
 for development and tests, and had some problems (with awk and gmake),
 both solved. Does anybody has had other problems?
   thanks for any comments,
 
 Tiago
 
 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

1999-12-30 Thread Chris Schleifer
Remco van 't Veer wrote:
 I sure hope 8i runs on potato.  Can anybody confirm this?
 
 Regards,
 Remco
 

Hi,
It seems to work fine. Although I only installed it and haven't used it
much at all yet. I did do some imports which went normally though.


$ sqlplus

SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production on Wed Dec 29 17:15:48 1999

(c) Copyright 1999 Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.

Enter user-name: chris
Enter password: 

Connected to:
Oracle8i Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production
With the Java option
PL/SQL Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production

SQL quit
Disconnected from Oracle8i Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production
With the Java option
PL/SQL Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production

$ cat /etc/debian_version 
potato


Chris Schleifer


Netscape mail timezones

1999-12-16 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hey,

There was a thread a week or so ago trying to figure out why Netscape
was always stamping GMT times on emails sent from it. I can't find an
answer for the problem in the archives yet, and I don't remember there
being one on the list. Anyway I found the answer today when this started
to bother me (I wanted my boss to see the how late I work! ;-). It
wasn't that hard to find, go to http://help.netscape.com/, type timezone
in the search box, the answer is the first result returned.

The answer is here: http://help.netscape.com/kb/consumer/991108-1.html

Basically you need to set the shell variable TZ to your current timezone
entry before you start Netscape. The Netscape solution on the link above
doesn't apply to Debian though. What I did is add the line export
TZ=`cat /etc/timezone` to my ~/.bash_profile, so it gets set whenever I
log in. Hope that helps.

Chris Schleifer


Re: ipchains and REDIRECT

1999-11-20 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,
I just had to do the same thing as you and had no problems. I am using a
2.2 kernel w/ ipchains and had to forward port 80.

The IP Masquerade HOWTO was really helpful to me
(http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO.html). Chapter 6
explains exactly how to do port forwarding with 2.2 kernels
(http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO-6.html#ss6.8).

To summarize what the howto says about port forwarding, it looks like
the commands to setup port forwarding have changed from 2.0 to 2.2 which
is probably your problem. You don't want to use the REDIRECT rule for
ipchains anymore, but a new tool called ipmasqadm to set up port
forwarding.

It looks like the command you would need is something like:
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 207.158.172.XXX 2401 -R
192.168.2.2 2401

I am just going off what I read just now in the howto and I really
haven't looked at the details of your message so this may not be the
only thing you need to do. I would definitely check out the howto for
yourself as it's a pretty good one.

Chris Schleifer

P.S. This uses IPPORTFW which I have compiled into the kernel and you
have as a module, this may make a difference.



Jonathan Lupa wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 Ever since moving to the 2.2 kernels and switching to ipchains, I have
 not been able to get redirection working right, and I'm hoping someone
 can spot what I am doing wrong..
 
 I have a gateway computer called sith, and two computers sitting
 behind it named rankor and fig. The ppp0 line is [207.158.172.XXX],
 and my goal is to expose the cvs server running on rankor to the world
 through port forwarding. (rankor == 192.168.2.2)
 
 sith's firewall rules script looks like this:
 
 #!/bin/sh
 export IPCHAINS=/sbin/ipchains
 if [ -x $IPCHAINS ]; then
   # Flush current ruleset and apply our default policies
   $IPCHAINS -F input
   $IPCHAINS -F output
   $IPCHAINS -F forward
 
   # We start out promiscuous... probably should fix this
   $IPCHAINS -P output ACCEP
   $IPCHAINS -P input ACCEPT
   $IPCHAINS -P forward REJECT
 
   # Setup masquerade - all traffic from 192.168.2.0 gets masq-forwarded.
   $IPCHAINS -A forward -p all -s 192.168.2.0/24 -j MASQ
 
   # Stop those evil hackers from seeing telnet passwords
   $IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 telnet -j REJECT
 
   # I don't use NFS, you can be damned well sure I don't use this!
   $IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 portmapper -j REJECT
   $IPCHAINS -A input -p udp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 portmapper -j REJECT
   $IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 nntp -j REJECT
 
 # Punch port 2401 to Rankor's cvs pserver...
 # $IPCHAINS -A input -b -p tcp -s 207.158.172.XXX/32 2401 -d
 # 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j REDIRECT
 # $IPCHAINS -A input -b -p udp -s 207.158.172.XXX/32 2401 -d
 # 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j REDIRECT
 
   $IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 2401 -d 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j 
 REDIRECT
   $IPCHAINS -A input -p udp -s 0.0.0.0/0 2401 -d 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j 
 REDIRECT
 fi
 
 I've tried both the commented out version, and the live redirectcs,
 and neither seems to work.  When I run a program on sith's 2401 port,
 it actually gets the hit (so it is falling through to the default
 input rule).
 
 Here is the networking portions my kernel (2.2.12) .config file, in case I 
 missed something
 there...
 
 CONFIG_PACKET=y
 CONFIG_NETLINK=y
 CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y
 CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=y
 CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
 CONFIG_FILTER=y
 CONFIG_UNIX=y
 CONFIG_INET=y
 CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
 CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y
 CONFIG_NETLINK=y
 CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
 CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
 CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y
 CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NAT=y
 CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
 CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL_NETLINK=y
 CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=y
 CONFIG_IP_ALWAYS_DEFRAG=y
 CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y
 CONFIG_IP_TRANSPARENT_PROXY=y
 CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE=y
 CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP=y
 CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_MOD=y
 CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPAUTOFW=m
 CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPPORTFW=m
 CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_MFW=m
 CONFIG_IP_ROUTER=y
 CONFIG_NET_IPIP=m
 CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y
 CONFIG_SKB_LARGE=y
 CONFIG_IPV6=m
 CONFIG_IPX=m
 CONFIG_IPX_INTERN=y
 CONFIG_SPX=m
 CONFIG_ATALK=m
 
 Thanks in advance for any help and/or pointers on firewalling better.
 I searched the archive before posting, but for some reason the cgi_bin
 script isn't working right and I can't access the articles which look
 like they are related...so apologies if this is just another boring
 rehash. =)
 
 Thanks,
 
 -Jonathan
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG public key available from http://www.jamdata.net/~jjlupa/gpg.asc
 
   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature


Re: ipchains and REDIRECT

1999-11-20 Thread Chris Schleifer
Well now I'm confused I just looked a little more into this and it looks
like you should be able to use the REDIRECT rule as long as you said yes
to transparent proxy in the kernel config (according to the kernel help
and man ipchains).
Anyway I guess the best suggestion I can give after all is to take a
look at the IP Masquerading and Ipchains HOWTOs.

Chris Schleifer
 

Chris Schleifer wrote:
 
 Hi,
 I just had to do the same thing as you and had no problems. I am using a
 2.2 kernel w/ ipchains and had to forward port 80.
 
 The IP Masquerade HOWTO was really helpful to me
 (http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO.html). Chapter 6
 explains exactly how to do port forwarding with 2.2 kernels
 (http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO-6.html#ss6.8).
 
 To summarize what the howto says about port forwarding, it looks like
 the commands to setup port forwarding have changed from 2.0 to 2.2 which
 is probably your problem. You don't want to use the REDIRECT rule for
 ipchains anymore, but a new tool called ipmasqadm to set up port
 forwarding.
 
 It looks like the command you would need is something like:
 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 207.158.172.XXX 2401 -R
 192.168.2.2 2401
 
 I am just going off what I read just now in the howto and I really
 haven't looked at the details of your message so this may not be the
 only thing you need to do. I would definitely check out the howto for
 yourself as it's a pretty good one.
 
 Chris Schleifer
 
 P.S. This uses IPPORTFW which I have compiled into the kernel and you
 have as a module, this may make a difference.
 
 Jonathan Lupa wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  Ever since moving to the 2.2 kernels and switching to ipchains, I have
  not been able to get redirection working right, and I'm hoping someone
  can spot what I am doing wrong..
 
  I have a gateway computer called sith, and two computers sitting
  behind it named rankor and fig. The ppp0 line is [207.158.172.XXX],
  and my goal is to expose the cvs server running on rankor to the world
  through port forwarding. (rankor == 192.168.2.2)
 
  sith's firewall rules script looks like this:
 
  #!/bin/sh
  export IPCHAINS=/sbin/ipchains
  if [ -x $IPCHAINS ]; then
# Flush current ruleset and apply our default policies
$IPCHAINS -F input
$IPCHAINS -F output
$IPCHAINS -F forward
 
# We start out promiscuous... probably should fix this
$IPCHAINS -P output ACCEP
$IPCHAINS -P input ACCEPT
$IPCHAINS -P forward REJECT
 
# Setup masquerade - all traffic from 192.168.2.0 gets masq-forwarded.
$IPCHAINS -A forward -p all -s 192.168.2.0/24 -j MASQ
 
# Stop those evil hackers from seeing telnet passwords
$IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 telnet -j REJECT
 
# I don't use NFS, you can be damned well sure I don't use this!
$IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 portmapper -j REJECT
$IPCHAINS -A input -p udp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 portmapper -j REJECT
$IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -d 207.158.172.XXX/32 nntp -j REJECT
 
  # Punch port 2401 to Rankor's cvs pserver...
  # $IPCHAINS -A input -b -p tcp -s 207.158.172.XXX/32 2401 -d
  # 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j REDIRECT
  # $IPCHAINS -A input -b -p udp -s 207.158.172.XXX/32 2401 -d
  # 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j REDIRECT
 
$IPCHAINS -A input -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 2401 -d 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j 
  REDIRECT
$IPCHAINS -A input -p udp -s 0.0.0.0/0 2401 -d 192.168.2.2/32 2401 -j 
  REDIRECT
  fi
 
  I've tried both the commented out version, and the live redirectcs,
  and neither seems to work.  When I run a program on sith's 2401 port,
  it actually gets the hit (so it is falling through to the default
  input rule).
 
  Here is the networking portions my kernel (2.2.12) .config file, in case I 
  missed something
  there...
 
  CONFIG_PACKET=y
  CONFIG_NETLINK=y
  CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y
  CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=y
  CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
  CONFIG_FILTER=y
  CONFIG_UNIX=y
  CONFIG_INET=y
  CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
  CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y
  CONFIG_NETLINK=y
  CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
  CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
  CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y
  CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NAT=y
  CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
  CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL_NETLINK=y
  CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=y
  CONFIG_IP_ALWAYS_DEFRAG=y
  CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y
  CONFIG_IP_TRANSPARENT_PROXY=y
  CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE=y
  CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP=y
  CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_MOD=y
  CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPAUTOFW=m
  CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPPORTFW=m
  CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_MFW=m
  CONFIG_IP_ROUTER=y
  CONFIG_NET_IPIP=m
  CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y
  CONFIG_SKB_LARGE=y
  CONFIG_IPV6=m
  CONFIG_IPX=m
  CONFIG_IPX_INTERN=y
  CONFIG_SPX=m
  CONFIG_ATALK=m
 
  Thanks in advance for any help and/or pointers on firewalling better.
  I searched the archive before posting, but for some reason the cgi_bin
  script isn't working right and I can't access the articles which look
  like they are related...so apologies if this is just another boring
  rehash. =)
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Jonathan

Re: ipchains and REDIRECT

1999-11-20 Thread Chris Schleifer
Aargh, I'm really sorry to reply to myself twice. But I promise I'm done
now ;-).

I found the post linked to below on deja.com which explains it all.
Basically REDIRECT is only for forwarding between ports on the _local_
machine. You need ipmasqadm to forward to another machine.

The post:
http://x42.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=548096449search=threadCONTEXT=943065968.1817182317HIT_CONTEXT=943065968.1817182317hitnum=3

Chris Schleifer


Re: UDP port 1025(Blackjack)

1999-11-17 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,

I don't know a lot about this stuff but I can help a little I think.

When you are using a network, ports will get opened on your machine
whenever you make a connection, this way the remote machine has
somewhere to talk to. This is probably why you are seeing ports open
during one scan and closed the next time.

Nmap uses an internal database of service to port mapping. When it says
Blackjack, it is just a guess as to what could be running on that port.
You will see things like nmap telling you Back Orifice is running on a
linux box because of this. Take whatever service nmap says with a grain
of salt. You can also do 'grep 1025 /etc/services' to do a simple check
for yourself.

But the main thing I want to suggest is to not use nmap for scanning
your machines. Use lsof instead (apt-get install lsof). Lsof is VERY
cool and useful for many things. Install it, do 'lsof -i' as root, and
it will show you exactly which ports are open, which process is using
it, which user owns the process, and more. I run 'lsof -i' after every
apt-get upgrade to quickly make sure it hasn't decided to add a server I
don't want (happened last week with the changes to netstd in potato).

Hope this helps,
Chris Schleifer


aphro wrote:
 
 During the process of closing non important ports on my new server i
 noticed it has port 1025(UDP) and the service is Blackjack according to
 nmap.  Anyone know what this is? i dont see anything in the dpkg list for
 blackjack and its not on my machine at home, and its not on my main
 server.
 
 tia
 
 nate
 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
Vice President Network Operations   http://www.firetrail.com/
   Firetrail Internet Services Limited  http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/
 Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/
 Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/
 -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
 10:51pm up 89 days, 10:24, 2 users, load average: 1.87, 1.81, 1.69
 
 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: Sources of linux documentation

1999-11-05 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,
I don't know a thing about the debian-guide package and this answer seems 
obvious so
forgive me if I'm offbase here.
I see html.sty in the directory you listed but the permissions are wrong. Doing 
a
'chmod o+r html.sty' in that directory should fix your problem.

Chris Schleifer

Manuel Arenaz Silva wrote:

  I've tried some three times to get a book compressed in that bz2 format
  uncomperessed to a readable version. But no LaTex, TeX or LyX ever could
  read that stuff.
 
  Is there something in general wrong with that bz2 format or are there
  available some brand new TeX formats, which no Slink latex can read?

 In first place, you have to decompress the debian-guide.tar.bz2 file by using:

   tar -xvIf debian-guide.tar.bz2

 This command generates following files:

 -rwxr-xr-x   1 1000 arenaz 55 Jun 10 21:02 clean.sh
 -rw-r--r--   1 1000 arenaz 412100 Jul  1 18:16 coart.eps
 -rw-r--r--   1 1000 arenaz 347507 Nov  3 12:26 debian-tutorial.tex
 -rw-r--r--   1 1000 arenaz  27378 Jun  6 21:32 debian.cls
 -rw-r--r--   1 1000 arenaz   8606 Jun  7 03:37 debian10.clo
 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 1048 Nov  3 12:05 debian10.log
 -rw-r-   1 arenaz   340024367 Nov  3 12:11 html.sty
 drwxr-sr-x   2 1000 arenaz   1024 Jul  1 18:16 images
 -rwxr-xr-x   1 1000 arenaz258 Jun 11 17:39 remake.sh

 Now you can compile the file debian-tutorial.tex by using latex. In my linux 
 box the
 compiling process stops because the file html.sty is not installed. Where 
 can this
 file by obtained from? Is it available in any package?

 Thanks,

   Manuel Arenaz

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: restarting daemons

1999-10-08 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,
To turn off the sunrpc/portmap daemon (or whatever it's called) in potato you 
can
just do an 'update-rc.d -f portmap remove', and '/etc/init.d/portmap stop'. 
Then it
will be off and won't restart. If you ever want it to start up automatically 
again
you'll have know it's priority in the rc?.d dirs though, as update-rc.d removes 
all
the symlinks in those directories.

If I remember right in slink you need to comment out several lines in
/etc/init.d/netstd_init (netbase,netstd_misc... hmm not sure which), then 
restart
that init.d file.

BTW a much better way of seeing what services are listening for connections on 
your
machine (as opposed to portscanning) is to get the package 'lsof' and do an 
'lsof -i'
as root.

Hope that helps,
Chris Schleifer


Lev Lvovsky wrote:

 Hello,

 could someone please let me know how to restart all of the apache www
 daemons that are running so that it'll read the changes made in the
 httpd.conf file?

 'apache restart' doesn't do anything

 is there a generally accepted way of doing this for all 'net daemons?

 also, i'm sruprised nobody knows how to shutoffthe sunrpc daemon (or at
 least that's what I believe it is when I portscan my machine)...any clues
 as to where I could find info on this?

 thank you!!
 -lev

 //sig:
 //Social graces are the packet headers of everyday life

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: Last potato linuxlogo

1999-10-07 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,
Changelogs and bug reports are very helpful...

I found this line in /usr/doc/linuxlogo/changelog.Debian.gz:
* Added the original swirl files to the debian directory (Fixes #46588).

The bug report link (http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/46/46588.html) mentions the
swirl is back in the source package. So it looks like a re-compile is needed in
order to get it back.

Chris Schleifer


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Until this evening I had linuxlogo displaying the pretty debian swirl. However
 after the latest potato update I noticed this had changed to a pengouin, which
 looks very ugly on my screen (the default is squeezed because of the
 resolution, and the banner mode does not look nice because of my fonts). Is
 there some hidden option to have it display the debian logo again, or do i
 have to downgrade it?

 Thanks,
 -Lex

   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature


Re: traceroute: icmp socket: Operation not permitted

1999-09-05 Thread Chris Schleifer
There were problems with a version of the netstd package (3.07-8 I think) which 
was
in potato a few days ago. You probably got this version when you upgraded. Try
updating to the newest (3.07-9) version, it fixed this problem on mine.

Chris Schleifer

Phillip Deackes wrote:

 Today I tried to use traceroute and got the message:

 traceroute: icmp socket: Operation not permitted

 This has happened only recently. I tried running the command as root,
 but got the same message.

 It appears that this has happened since I last did apt-get dist-upgrade
 (I use unstable) *or* since I compiled and installed kernel 2.2.12

 Any ideas?

 Thanks very much.

 --
 Phillip Deackes
 Debian Linux (Potato)

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: Gdm is evil!

1999-08-26 Thread Chris Schleifer
Hi,

Check /var/state/gdm/:0.log.
If it says something like:
AUDIT: Wed Aug 11 20:55:24 1999: 174 X: client 1 rejected from local host
Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server
Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server

Then check bug #42636 : http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/42/42636.html
It's probably the reason as this causes the exact same behavior for me that your
getting.

Chris Schleifer

John Haggerty wrote:

 I have spent the past 5 hours bashing my brains out getting gdm to work on my
 system and it never will!
 I try to start it and it just displays a blank screen without the window 
 popping

 up. I tried to do as the README.Debian said and to change the symlinksso that
 gdm and xdm are isolated in different runlevels. What I did was just to delete
 S99xdm (the symlink to /etc/init.d/xdm) so that it won't lock the system 
 anymore

 however it still will not display anything I have installed all of the
 dependencies however it still hates me!
 The binary for the login interface program works but does nothing on it's 
 own. I

 assume this is a problem with pam/config files. I looked at /etc/gdm/Init and
 say :0 and Default which together has only a single program called xsetroot 
 and
 some rather cryptic arguments. This appears to be broken or what? Could 
 someone
 please help me?

 
 Separate hype from hope on Wall Street. Visit  http://www.streetforce.com

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null