Re: ssh bookmarks?
On 01-03-24 Felix E. Klee wrote: is it possible to create bookmarks for ssh connections? For example, I want to type ssh sample instead of ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]. BTW, ncftp supports this feature. What is so difficult about reading the manpage and looking for User and Host in it? Host sample Hostname bla.sample.xyz User user Would you mind consulting please the available manpages and other documentation first, before sending such a question to this list? Christian -- Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Re: Now Stormix is no more . . .
On 01-02-04 Alvin Oga wrote: and if there are other packages we wanna pick up... What other packages do you mean? i/we will help out donno howconnections/machines/??? ( to remain GPL'd... Who is we and why do you want to help out? Do you know what SourceForge is and what kind of connection and machines they already donate? SAS and stormpkg will remain GPL as they are currently licensed under GPL. Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853 pgpSmdE9vD4Bk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Now Stormix is no more . . .
On 01-02-02 Phillip Deackes wrote: apps they developed? I am thinking particularly of the superb installation routine; SAS, the GUI administration modules and Storm Package Manager, the front-end to apt. Storm Package Manager is available in Debian Unstable (+ Testing?) already. Just a short note here. stormpkg and SAS will be further developed via sourceforge, where already some people created the nessecary projetcs and will maintain the code. Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853 pgpXmBwz2edTv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Quake is GPL
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 99-12-26 Joseph Carter wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 1999 at 02:37:04PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: I would *personally* make sure that I was in compliance with the relevant laws. If I felt that that would take too much of my time, then I would stop mirroring. Just because a big group of developers isn't able to provide a solution for such cases which is better then stop mirroring? So far your attitude has been Take quake out of Debian entirely now or I will shut down my mirror because I don't have time to make sure my mirror is legal and I want you to do it for me. If that's how it has to be, that's how it has to be. You're better to stop mirroring. You definitely misunderstand what I write. You assume things that I don't write. Plese stop this or this discussion want reach far. I want to provide every FTP-Maintainer with a mechanismen which makes it easier for them to mirror only those packages that are legal. Nothing else. Ciao Christian -- * Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team * * Use Debian - a free Operating System * --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.0a (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjhmh1kACgkQqeZn/ybMeFMP5gCeL076LuW1lM2w8zPWYY1NY1jk fwAAoLESpwEx1Hxov7PqNh+k/2NRbm5C =8TH7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
Re: Debian and Redhat - are most linux users missing the point?
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Kurz wrote: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 08:36:38PM +1000, Peter Ludwig wrote: Now, I have a few problems with it. 1) No IDE for the compiler. Try Emacs or XEmacs. Don't be mislead by the fact that they call Emacs an editor - it's far, far more than a mere editor. It has support for compilation and interactive debugging within an Emacs session, and has hooks for using version control systems and syntax highlighting for most programming languages you're likely to care about. Hm, but there are people, that don't want Emacs or XEmacs, because they prefer some other editor or vim. :-) We got xwpe as an IDE as Debian-Package and there's also an IDE called rhide[1], but it isn't a Debian-Package yet. Maybe someone creates one of it. Didn't rhide begin in the DOS world? It would have to be heavily modified to be usefull in the Unix world, wouldn't it? No, I looked at the homepage yesterday and the authors are porting it to Linux. You can get the sources and static compiled binaries. For the compilation you need the source of gdb, AFAIK. But that shouldn't be a problem with Debian. Ciao Christian -- /* http://www.rhein-neckar.de/~jupiter/Christian Kurz */
Re: Debian and Redhat - are most linux users missing the point?
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 08:36:38PM +1000, Peter Ludwig wrote: Now, I have a few problems with it. 1) No IDE for the compiler. Try Emacs or XEmacs. Don't be mislead by the fact that they call Emacs an editor - it's far, far more than a mere editor. It has support for compilation and interactive debugging within an Emacs session, and has hooks for using version control systems and syntax highlighting for most programming languages you're likely to care about. Hm, but there are people, that don't want Emacs or XEmacs, because they prefer some other editor or vim. :-) We got xwpe as an IDE as Debian-Package and there's also an IDE called rhide[1], but it isn't a Debian-Package yet. Maybe someone creates one of it. Ciao Christian [1] http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho/rhide.html -- Menschen, die bloß arbeiten, finden keine Zeit zum Träumen. Nur wer träumt gelangt zur Weisheit. SMOHALLA (Nez Perce) /* http://www.rhein-neckar.de/~jupiter/Christian Kurz */
Re: pine mutt
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 07:50:57AM +0100, Frederick Page wrote: Well I tried pine at first (it did news, but not too good), then tried SLRN, which was pretty good, but had no nice filtering/scoring. Then I tried tin and it's IMHO great. Aroo? In what way is SLRN's scoring poor? IMHO it is pretty much perfect and IIRC it had scoring before tin did. I dunno about scoring--I rarely use the function, but I re-migrated back to TRN when I realized that SLRN had no killfiles, what I consider to be an essential tool in USENET. If a give a person or a subject a score of - it is killed and I don't see his articles anymore. This score can also be lowered by the configuration to other values. So you have a combined Score- and Killfile. Ciao Christian -- /* http://www.rhein-neckar.de/~jupiter/Christian Kurz */
Re: How to import pub keys with gnupg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, using the '-a' on the export did work to get rid of the 'public key not found' error when doing: # gpg -r B -se file1 That's the correct syntax for doing this. I had actually tried this before. But when 'B' goes to decrypt the file1.gpg this is what happens: #cat /home/A/file1.gpg | gpg gpg: public key decryption failed: secret key not available gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available Why can't B find his own secret key? It should be in his .gnupg directory. It looks like the secret-key is not available. This can be checked by doing gpg --list-secret-keys. Then you see which secret key is available for encrypten and/or signing. With gpg --list-keys you can see who's key is available. So you should check the available keys carefully. It looks like you have made a mistake while importing and exporting the keys. I suggest that you deleted the files in the .gnupg directory and generate new keys and then export them with the -a-Option and you should always specific who's key you want to export. Thanks for the help with the unsecured memory. Hm, I'm going to look if this is a know bug or not and then write a mail to the maintainer. Ciao Christian -- /* http://www.rhein-neckar.de/~jupiter/Christian Kurz */
Re: Archiving Old Messages and Misc Mail Features
Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2. Threads in progress (like the heated Gimp Debian Logo contest debate on debian-devel): I'd like to keep the whole thread intact until discussion ceases. A rm mailbox will orphan any future messages from that thread. Use GNUs to read your mailing list mail and it can autoexpire articles (deleting your local copy) after a time period you configure. Also mutt can expire articles after a certain time, which is configurable. I'm using this here and it works great. Here's the relevant-part of .muttrc: # # Tag old messages in mailinglists for expiring them. # Simply press d, after entering one of the folders, iff mutt asks # tag- # folder-hook =debian-user$ 'push T~r1m\n\;' # 1 months Ciao Christian
Re: How to import pub keys with gnupg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been experimenting with gpg and have hit a little snag. [some stuff deleted] So, where am I going wrong? It has to be a stupid error in the export or import. But where? You should try the option -a. So you should use the following command to extract a key gpg --export -a _name_of_key_. Also, why am I getting the insecure memory warning? Because it would be better to make gpg suidroot, because then it use secure memory and also drops this bit very fast. I'm using it here and it works great. This way is also recommend by the author of gnupg. Ciao Christian -- /* http://www.rhein-neckar.de/~jupiter/Christian Kurz */
