new computer ??

2000-04-06 Thread Hunter H Marshall
I'm considering a new computer. I was considering 2, but maybe I'll turn my
100MHZ pentium into a dedicated browser for family needs.

ANYhoo, does anyone have good/bad experiences with any of the linux hardware
vedors, VALinux, etc? Are the newest machines from Gateway, Dell, etc presenting
any hardware compatibility issues? Strong opinions between regular PC sellers
vs. the linux harwdare sellers?

This is to run Debian, and maybe win9x.

Thanks

hunter


gnome mimetype and /etc/mailcap

2000-03-31 Thread Hunter H Marshall
My mutt claims no handler for image/jeg. There is no entry for image/jpeg
in /etc/mailcap. ok. But gnome control center mimetypes has extensive
mime.type/mailcap info and in particular has an eeyes entry for image/jpeg.

Where does gnome store its mailcap inforamtion? Or even its information!

:-)

Thanks

hunter


flat panels anyone?

2000-03-28 Thread Hunter H Marshall
Anybody using a flat panel display? Are there any special issues
regarding their use? I don't know what Dell, etc, are using for their
cards, but ATI makes a digital card that I think is a supported chip
set (ATI Rage LT Pro). Is that the only thing to worry about?

I'm guessing that the DFP connector refers to a recent standard so
that displays and cards no longer need to be purchased together?

Thanks for any info, anecdotes, or vague rumors.

hunter


Re: I Screwed up WindowMaker

2000-03-23 Thread Hunter H Marshall
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 06:45:05PM -0700, Matheson wrote:
- I just upgraded WindowMaker on my slink from
- http://www.debian.org/~vincent/, but now it doesn't work.  When I start
- X Windows, it starts to display the appicon and stuff, but then it goes
- back to the login screen.  Does any one know what's wrong?

It happened to me. Somehow I saw a complaint about a menu entry (on the
console maybe). So I ran update-menus. Then all was well. YMMV

good luck

hunter


no /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe ??

2000-03-15 Thread Hunter H Marshall
I have a potato (i386) system (updated today). About a month ago I built 
myself a 2.2.14 kernel.

I just learned today why kerneld keeps getting started, I have no
/proc/sys/kernel/modprobe.

I finally figured out that the examples directing text into
various /proc files relies on the fact that they ALREADY exist (as
opposed to CREATING them).

So what do I do to create /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe ?

Thanks

hunter


not a newbie, still dumb

1999-10-15 Thread Hunter H Marshall
I get left without a working dpkg when I tried to backtrack from libc6 2.1
to 2.0. I couldn't find a non-deb dpkg, so I reinstalled base from CD.

Not too bad really. Had to put my account back (my directories were fine).
 Now my dpkg database is way out of sync with my system. That too is not really
a problem, but when I try the libc2.1 jump again, I want to know that dpkg/apt
are aware of all my tools.

It was neat how the machine was pretty much just like it was (net access, etc).
I did quite a bit of reinstall, and luckily those things that were redundant
just reused the disk space it had before.

Will I just have to keep reinstalling to where I was before? IS there
a way to determine what packages (or programs) are on my machine that are NOT
under dpkg accounting?

One benefit...I learned dselect After only 2-3 years Geez, or is it
4-5

hunter


libc 2.0-2.1: apt-get ftp problem

1999-10-11 Thread Hunter H Marshall
I have not been on the list for awhile so forgive any redundancy. I checked 
the mail archives and found no answers and only one similar complaint.

I worked up the nerve to upgrade my slink to libc 2.1 with the goal of playing 
with gnome. I used (for the first time) apt-get with an ftp entry in
the sources.list and did a apt-get install libc6.

It worked well and the system seemed fine. apt-get included
(via depenndency) stdc++, apt, and some others (5-6 total).

Every subsequent ftp retrieval via apt-get complained that it had failed
with a size mismatch. The retrieved packages seemed fine however, and 
installed successfully without complaint.

Also, at some point, apt-get --no-download install orbit (for example)
failed with a complaint about unable to handle media swap. This is the 
one symptom I found reported a recent deb-user archive, but no answer.

It is with hindsight that I'm guessing that the real problem started after
the intial libc upgrade (I ignored the size complaint since it seemed
to be erroneous, but eventually got stopped by the media swap 
failure).

My plan was to go back to slink, do the libc upgrade, and look more
carefully for the media swap error. But since it  appears that apt-get
won't downgrade (?), I am writing this to decide if I really want to 
to the dpkg 2-step that will be required to remove the (several) gnome packages 
I had installed and get back to my previous state.

Does anyone have hints, ideas, experience that might be relevant?

Thanks

hunter


Moved harddisk

1998-03-03 Thread Hunter H Marshall
I have a 1.2.8 system that I boot from floppy. I
moved the harddrive from (effectively) /dev/hda to
/dev/hdb. I then used rdev to change the boot
device and the swap device to their hdb
counterparts. Should that have been sufficient?

Is there a primary/secondary IDE issue (if I'm
saying that right)? What about the /etc/fstab
which reference /dev/hda?

Thanks

hunter


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Compute Farm

1998-02-10 Thread Hunter H Marshall
Tim Sailer wrote:
 
 They want to be able
 to configure 1 machine and mirror the setup to each machine 

See if the recent aricle in Linux Journal might be
of help. The article concerned the use of 160
Alpha Linux boxes for graphics rendering. I belive
it was the Jan '98 issue.

http://www.ssc.com/lj/

hunter


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Compute Farm

1998-02-10 Thread Hunter H Marshall
Behan Webster wrote:
 
 Hunter H Marshall wrote:
 
  Tim Sailer wrote:
  
   They want to be able
   to configure 1 machine and mirror the setup to each machine
 
  See if the recent aricle in Linux Journal might be
  of help. The article concerned the use of 160
  Alpha Linux boxes for graphics rendering. I belive
  it was the Jan '98 issue.
 
  http://www.ssc.com/lj/
 
 
 Since Tim wants reason to use Debian instead of Redhat, and the article
 you suggest talks of using Redhat, that probably won't be very helpful.

I do not have the article in hand. I was afraid of
something like that!

:-{

hunter red-faced marshall


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .