Re: Best ways to secure POP/SMTP on server?
At 12:43 AM 1/5/01 +0100, andreas palsson wrote: But I also realize that by doing that, my system could be misused by other people than my users. Just don't make it open relay then ;) I am most worried about SMTP, in which there seems to be no(?) actual password-verification. Just use POP before SMTP method then, in meaning if you have mobile users, to make your users able to send mail using your SMTP server, they must authenticated themselves by checking their mail (POP) and then send their mail. Does anyone have encountered a similar situation? Suggestions on what to do? What to read? www.qmail.org www.postfix.org
Re: newbie: 3c905C eth0 card not detected
At 03:05 PM 12/30/00 +0100, Ralf Batri wrote: On Fre, Dez 29, 2000 at 06:13:43 -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote: > I change the computer to P III 800 EB with Asus CUV4X, then it didn't work. > I tried to use ec905c and it worked !, so any idea why 3c905b didn't work then ? I use the same board here and it's working . well,it worked in Windows 98 SE on the same machine, but not in Mandrake, Slackware ;(
Re: newbie: 3c905C eth0 card not detected
At 09:32 PM 12/29/00 +0100, Ralf Batri wrote: On Fre, Dez 29, 2000 at 01:49:50 -0500, D-Man wrote: > Both 3Com and RedHat say that the 3c905b card does NOT work with > Linux. I don't know about the 3c905c. I bought a much cheaper > LinkSys card instead and have been very happy with it. If definatly using the 3c905b and 3c905c on all of my machines, and it working perfectly for me ! Before I use 3c905b on Dell XPRS 166s, and it worked flawlessly, but after I change the computer to P III 800 EB with Asus CUV4X, then it didn't work. I tried to use ec905c and it worked !, so any idea why 3c905b didn't work then ?
Re: port scan logger
At 06:00 PM 6/18/00 +0200, Sven Burgener wrote: Hi all >From other Linux systems, I know about the port scan-logger scanlogd. It seems that this is not in the debian distro. Are there any (good) alternatives? why not using portsentry grab it at www.freshmeat.net
Re: exim, sendmail, smail, qmail .... ???
you can find the comparison among the products above at http://www.linuxcare.com/products/prodmore.epl?PRODUCT_GROUP=Mail+Transfer+A gents
Re: Mailing list managers
At 01:11 AM 6/5/00 -0600, Nate Duehr wrote: On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:36AM -0400, Randy Edwards wrote: www.mailman.org I believe also if I'm not mistaken will get you to their home page. It should be linked off of python.org somewhere too. www.list.org I think ;)
Re: Mailing list managers
At 11:08 AM 6/4/00 -0400, Randy Edwards wrote: With today's announcement that majordomo is going to be dropped from Debian, I was wondering if I could spark up a discussion as to the pros/cons of other Debian-packaged mailing list programs. What other mailing list managers are you using? (I've only used Debian use smartlist see www.procmail.org But there are some another big class milis manager like listar (Www.listar.org), ezmlm [run only under qmail] (www.ezmlm.org)
No archive ?
Is this mailling list doesn't have any archive ? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :: ::: Date: 7 Mar 2000 15:35:20 - : To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : : X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: archive retrieval: ls volumeold : ls -l volumeold BEGIN---cut here-- total 0 END-cut here-- --- AFLHI 058009990407128029/089802---(102598//991024)
