Installing XFCE 4.14 on Buster?

2019-09-05 Thread Jesse Sheidlower


I'm running Buster, pretty much a stock install, with XFCE. I'd like to upgrade 
XFCE to 4.14 (which was released last month), which is in unstable, mainly to 
take advantage of what is said to be improved HiDPI support in this 
version--I'm about to get a pair of 4K monitors (yes, my video card can handle 
it).

What is the safest, preferably automated, way to perform this? I don't want to 
switch my entire system to unstable.



XFCE--can't mount USB devices

2011-10-12 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running XFCE 4.8 on Debian Testing, with everything up to date; I'm
using xdm as my display manager. Any attempt by a non-root user to mount
a USB device in Thunar fails with the message Mount Failed: Failed to
mount [device] Not Authorized. I do have Thunar set to mount
removable media automatically.

This seems to have been a problem from the start of 4.8; there's quite a
bit of discussion of this for Arch Linux and Slackware, but I can't find
anything useful for Debian. It seems to be an issue with ConsoleKit, but
the solutions for Arch don't really apply for Debian as the setup is
different. There was a discussion of this in the Debian forum when 4.8
came out at http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=20t=63088start=60
but there was no clean answer.

A related problem is that I am not able to restart or shut down using
the graphical tools; here's a recent discussion of this on the XFCE
forum from a Debian Testing user:
http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=6343 This also seems to depend on
a ConsoleKit permissions issue. I don't particularly care about this
myself, as it's easy enough to do this from the commandline; I'm
mentioning it only as a parallel.

I'd be grateful for any suggestions. This does seriously affect the
usability of the system, and it's getting very frustrating; I'd think
that the ability of a regular user to hotplug removable media should be
an important thing to have working.

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111012095310.ga27...@panix.com



Re: XFCE--can't mount USB devices

2011-10-12 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:20:27PM +0100, Brian wrote:
 On Wed 12 Oct 2011 at 05:53:10 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
  I'm running XFCE 4.8 on Debian Testing, with everything up to date; I'm
  using xdm as my display manager. Any attempt by a non-root user to mount
  a USB device in Thunar fails with the message Mount Failed: Failed to
  mount [device] Not Authorized. I do have Thunar set to mount
  removable media automatically.
  
  This seems to have been a problem from the start of 4.8; there's quite a
  bit of discussion of this for Arch Linux and Slackware, but I can't find
  anything useful for Debian. It seems to be an issue with ConsoleKit, but
  the solutions for Arch don't really apply for Debian as the setup is
  different. There was a discussion of this in the Debian forum when 4.8
  came out at http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=20t=63088start=60
  but there was no clean answer.
 
 The root cause is indeed consolekit. Have a try with this:
 
 In /etc/pam.d/common-session insert the line
 
session optional   pam_loginuid.co

(I assume this was meant to be pam_loginuid.so)

 just before
 
session optional   pam_ck_connector.so nox11
 
 Log out and log in again. Or reboot. This works on my machines (and
 should solve your restart/shut down problem also) but there is a plan B
 if needed. 

I'm afraid I need Plan B. Making this change and rebooting had no effect
on USB-device mounting or on the restart/shutdown display.

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111012121008.ga10...@panix.com



Re: XFCE--can't mount USB devices

2011-10-12 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:51:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
 On Wed 12 Oct 2011 at 08:10:09 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
  (I assume this was meant to be pam_loginuid.so)
 
 Yes.
 
  I'm afraid I need Plan B. Making this change and rebooting had no effect
  on USB-device mounting or on the restart/shutdown display.
 
 Create /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/50-local.d/consolekit.pkla with the
 contents:
 
 [restart]
 Identity=unix-user:*
 Action=org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart
 ResultAny=yes
 
 [stop]
 Identity=unix-user:brian

Took me a bit to figure out why restart worked by shutdown didn't,
until I realized that I'm not brian...

 Action=org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.stop
 ResultAny=yes
 
 In the same directory have udisks.pkla containing:
 
 [udisks]
 Identity=unix-user:*
 Action=org.freedesktop.udisks*
 ResultAny=yes

OK, this works. Whew. Thank you _very_ much indeed.

What is the overall view of this issue? Is this a bug? Is your solution
the right one? Should it be fed back to the XFCE team? From my
perspective, this should Just Work, and the user shouldn't be expected
to figure out a solution like this

Really, thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111013020953.ga4...@panix.com



Startup script not working

2011-08-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running Xfce under wheezy on a desktop system. I have two monitors
permanently attached to the computer; that is, I never need to do any
configuration on the fly.

To set up dual-head, I run the simple command 

  xrandr --output HDMI2 --right-of HDMI1

I'd like to run this automatically at boot, and, following some
instructions I found online, I put this line in a file called
45custom_xrandr and put it in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/ However, this
doesn't get executed at boot, so I have to run the xrandr command
manually. Permissions are the same as the other files in that directory.
What do I need to do to get this to work?

I always screw things up when I make an xorg.conf file, so I'd prefer to
do this using xrandr, which always works fine, rather than writing an
xorg.conf. 

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110819103905.ga20...@panix.com



Re: xorg problem--dual-head, Debian vs. Ubuntu

2010-03-16 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
 also sprach Jesse Sheidlower jes...@panix.com [2010.03.15.1453 +0100]:
  The T60 has a Radeon X1300 card; the built-in monitor runs at
  1400 x 1050. I'm trying to attach a 1280 x 1024 external
  monitor through the VGA port. I'm running Xorg 1.7.5, and I do
  not have an xorg.conf at all, I'm letting Xorg generate the
  configuration. When I plug in the external monitor, and run
  Display Preferences to try to set up the two displays, I get a
  popup message reading The selected configuration for displays
  could not be applied[:] required virtual size does not fit
  available size: requested=(2680,1050), minimum=(320, 200),
  maximum=(1400, 1400).

I'm sorry for the delay--I responded to this yesterday, also
posting my xorg.conf file, but I realized that the message 
apparently never went through. I'll skip the conf file
this time.

 Does the following work?
 
   xrandr --output VGA --mode 1280x1024 --left-of LVDS

No, that just gives me:

$ xrandr --output VGA --mode 1280x1024 --left-of LVDS
warning: output VGA not found; ignoring

Which is odd, because when I ran xrandr --query it certainly
did think it was there.

In any event: I did play around with the conf file again,
based on the suggestions elsewhere in this thread, and despite
the fact that I had unsuccessfully tried similar things
before, this time I got it to work, so I successfully have a
conf-file based dual-head setup that's adjustable via the
Display Preferences app.

I do wonder why this is handled differently in Ubuntu vs.
Debian--I had imagined that this sort of thing would be based
just on the implementation of X, but if it's true that it's
some deep tweaking that Ubuntu is doing, I guess I just have
to acknowledge that they're different in this regard. I'd
think that it would be useful to have Debian do this too (I
don't think that everything should be done for me, but here I
can't see any reason why it's a downside for the OS to handle
it entirely).

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100316125651.ga22...@panix.com



xorg problem--dual-head, Debian vs. Ubuntu

2010-03-15 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

Hi. I'm running Debian unstable on a Lenovo T60. I'd like to
run this dual-head with an external monitor, but have been
having some problems that I tried to solve but eventually gave
up on because I'm so lousy with X configuration. However, I
recently discovered that things work fine out-of-the-box with
Ubuntu 9.10, running on the same computer (via a live USB
stick). So I'm wondering if there's some way to figure out why
there's a difference, and whether I can get the Debian system
working in the same way.

The T60 has a Radeon X1300 card; the built-in monitor runs at
1400 x 1050. I'm trying to attach a 1280 x 1024 external
monitor through the VGA port. I'm running Xorg 1.7.5, and I do
not have an xorg.conf at all, I'm letting Xorg generate the
configuration. When I plug in the external monitor, and run
Display Preferences to try to set up the two displays, I get a
popup message reading The selected configuration for displays
could not be applied[:] required virtual size does not fit
available size: requested=(2680,1050), minimum=(320, 200),
maximum=(1400, 1400).

I've Googled this and found a few bug reports that don't,
however, clarify what's going on.

But the notable thing for me is that running Ubuntu 9.10,
which is running Xorg 1.6.4, this Just Works, with everything
else identical--same hardware, same lack of xorg.conf file,
etc.

I'd be grateful for any suggestions. I'd vastly prefer _not_
to have to start messing around with the configuration file,
because apart from this one issue, I don't seem to need one,
and Ubuntu doesn't seem to need it either.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315135348.ga...@panix.com



Segfaults on apt-get update

2009-09-04 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running Sid. At some point in the last few days, I lost
the ability to update my packages; Synaptic, which I normally
use, crashes silently (even when run from the commandline),
and apt-get update segfaults midway through downloading
packages.

I Googled around for similar problems, and I tried a few
suggestions, including deleting /var/cache/apt/*.bin and
increasing the cache size with 

apt-get -o APT::Cache-Limit=5000 update

or the like. None of these has been successful.

Any suggestions for what I should try next?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Segfaults on apt-get update

2009-09-04 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
 On 2009-09-04 10:33 +0200, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
  I'm running Sid. At some point in the last few days, I lost
  the ability to update my packages; Synaptic, which I normally
  use, crashes silently (even when run from the commandline),
  and apt-get update segfaults midway through downloading
  packages.
 
 Did you notice bug #544080ยน and friends?

Not till now ;-)

Thanks, that did the trick.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: ThinkPad freezing after hw update?

2009-07-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:22:58AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  Unfortunately, a few seconds after hitting the MEPIS desktop
  screen, it, too, locks up hard, and I have to reboot.
  
  Next suggestion? :-(
 
 Just guessing: hardware failure?
 
 On the face of it your machine worked before you sent it for repairs and
 does not work after it was returned to you. I guess you should ask for
 help at lenovo...

True, but I'd like to make sure that it isn't the case of,
say, a BIOS update to something that Linux can't handle, for
example

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



ThinkPad freezing after hw update?

2009-07-02 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I have a two-year-old ThinkPad T60. It recently developed some
screen problems--the display was losing colors, and finally
started to die completely, going to black shortly after
startup--so I sent it back for a warranty repair. I pulled the
hard drive before I shipped it.

It's back now, but the machine is now locking up hard at
various points in the boot process. The first few times it
froze at Setting the system clock; then at Activing
swapfile swap. Now it is booting all the way and letting me
log into Gnome, but then locks up soon after. Needless to say,
it was working fine (aside from the screen) before the repair.

They included a note saying that they had also upgraded the
BIOS and embedded controller--to 2.23 and 1.07 respectively.

I'm running Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.29-2-686.

I'd be very grateful for any suggestion about what might have
caused this, and for how to evaluate and fix it.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: ThinkPad freezing after hw update?

2009-07-02 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:28:49AM -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 I have a two-year-old ThinkPad T60. It recently developed some
 screen problems--the display was losing colors, and finally
 started to die completely, going to black shortly after
 startup--so I sent it back for a warranty repair. I pulled the
 hard drive before I shipped it.

 It's back now, but the machine is now locking up hard at
 various points in the boot process. The first few times it
 froze at Setting the system clock; then at Activing
 swapfile swap. Now it is booting all the way and letting me
 log into Gnome, but then locks up soon after. Needless to say,
 it was working fine (aside from the screen) before the repair.

 They included a note saying that they had also upgraded the
 BIOS and embedded controller--to 2.23 and 1.07 respectively.

 I'm running Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.29-2-686.

 I'd be very grateful for any suggestion about what might have
 caused this, and for how to evaluate and fix it.

 Thanks.

 Jesse Sheidlower


 Have you thought about testing it with a Live CD?

 I would recommend the SimplyMEPIS version 8.0.06 it's based on Lenny  
 http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=05447 and if it works ok, you can go to  
 the Kmenu, System, Mepis, Mepis System Assistant and check and repair  
 your partitions. It also has the tools needed for most computer  
 maintenance like Testdisk, GParted etc and good to have in your toolbox.

I gave this a try.

Unfortunately, a few seconds after hitting the MEPIS desktop
screen, it, too, locks up hard, and I have to reboot.

Next suggestion? :-(

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Dual-head on Lenovo T60?

2009-05-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to get a dual-head setup working on my Lenovo T60,
without any success, despite having looked at number of pieces
of documentation, in particular the comprehensive-seeming wiki
entry at http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12, so
I'd be grateful if someone could give me a push in the right
direction.

I'm running Sid, with the 2.6.29-2 kernel, and version 1.6.2
RC 1 of the xorg server, with Gnome as my WM. My video card is
the ATI Radeon X1300; my X log shows it as:

(--) PCI:*(0...@1:0:0) ATI Technologies Inc M52 [Mobility Radeon X1300] rev 0, 
Mem 
@ 0xd800/134217728, 0xee10/65536, I/O @ 0x2000/256, BIOS @ 0x???
?/131072

The built-in display is 1400 x 1050, and the monitor I'd like
to use is 1280 x 1024. I want this monitor to display a
separate window.

I would like to take advantage of dynamic configuration using
grandr, as I want to be able to plug a monitor in without
restarting X.

I normally don't have an xorg.conf file, since the
auto-generated one works fine. However, this seems to be
loading the radeon driver, and the wiki I mentioned above
implies that only the radeonhd or ati drivers allow for
dynamic configuration. I tried using X -configure to
generate an xorg.conf, and then specified the ati or radeonhd
drivers, but both of these caused hard lockups. Also, I note
that if I boot the machine with a monitor attached, all of the
output goes to that monitor, not the built-in screen.  I don't
mind having an actual conf file, but I need the flexibility of
unplugging the monitor and moving around without compromising
the built-in display.

When I use the auto-generated xorg.conf and run grandr, I'm
able to do some things, such as flip the image on the second
monitor, but in the Layout tab, the Clone or Extend
options are grayed out, and I can't drag the icons around.
And when I run xrandr on the commandline, it tells me Screen
0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1400 x 1050, maximum 1400 x
1400, so if the maximum really is 1400 x 1400, it seems like
dual-head would never be possible.

I'm at a loss about what to try next, or what details of my
system would be helpful to provide. Any suggestions?

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Pulseaudio problems--certain parts not playing

2009-04-06 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 05:24:27AM +0100, Mark McCorkell wrote:
 
 I've no handy solution, since after way too much messing around with
 configuration files, I took the easy option and killed off PulseAudio.
 IMHO, there are still too many applications that don't work nicely
 enough with Pulse to make it worth the hassle*.

How does plain ALSA do with USB audio? I installed Pulse a
while ago because of problems getting USB audio to work, and
though it breaks every five minutes and I can't figure out how
to fix it, it _does_ play through USB speakers. If ALSA
supports that well enough, I'll happily move back--I don't
have any need for networked audio servers, or twelve different
kinds of volume controls, it's just my desktop.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Setting up TAP interface at boot?

2009-01-18 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

Where's the right place to set up a TAP interface at boot
time? When my system's up, I usually run tunctl -t tap0 as
root, but I'd like this to be created automatically. I do
have an entry in /etc/network/interfaces to configure this:

auto tap0
iface tap0 inet static
  address 192.168.5.1
  netmask 255.255.255.0

but this won't work if the interface doesn't exist, so I end
up having to do everything by hand.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Mounting Samba and fstab problem

2008-12-06 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to set up a Samba share on a Lenny laptop that I
can access as a regular user (i.e., me). I've tried going
through the man pages and Googling, but I'm still hung up on
something.

I can mount it manually with:

  $ sudo mount -t smbfs -o username=jester //192.168.1.10/HD /mnt/RemoteDisk

and then entering the Samba password. However, then I only
have access as root.

My goal is to have access without becoming root. I don't need
it to mount on boot, as it's a laptop, and I can't access the
disk when away from home. I tried following various
instructions in the man pages, and after making a separate
credential file, ended up with this in my /etc/fstab:

//192.168.1.10/HD  /mnt/RemoteDisk smbfs   
noauto,users,credentials=/home/jester/.smbpassword 0 0

However, when I then try to mount this, I get an error:

$ mount //192.168.1.10/HD
mount error: permission denied or not superuser and mount.cifs not installed 
SUID
$

Where is my mistake here? I've tried various things with no luck.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mounting Samba and fstab problem

2008-12-06 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:16:06PM +0200, subscriptions wrote:
 On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 17:52 +0100, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  
  I'm trying to set up a Samba share on a Lenny laptop that I
  can access as a regular user (i.e., me). I've tried going
  through the man pages and Googling, but I'm still hung up on
  something.
  
  I can mount it manually with:
  
$ sudo mount -t smbfs -o username=jester //192.168.1.10/HD /mnt/RemoteDisk
  
  and then entering the Samba password. However, then I only
  have access as root.
 
 ...
 
  Where is my mistake here? I've tried various things with no luck.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Jesse Sheidlower
 
 Use samba mount (as user, no fstab needed):
 $ smbmount //192.168.1.10/HD mount-point
 
 Where mount-point has 'rwx' for you!

Oh, god, thanks so much. The problem was just that
/mnt/RemoteDisk was owned by root; once I changed this there's
no problem with either an fstab-based mount or smbmount.

Thanks!

Jesse


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Virtual PC

2008-11-13 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 02:20:40PM +0100, pch wrote:
 Hello,
 Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.

I like VirtualBox. I had been using VMWare, but kept running
into problems every time there was a kernel update, when I had
to search around for patches and what not. And the interface
is now nightmarishly bad. If you're running a datacenter it
might be a good choice, I don't know.

But I switched to VirtualBox last week and got up and running
in minutes, everything Just Works, the interface is great, etc.
You can just add to /etc/apt/sources.list the appropriate line
from here:

http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads

and you're good to go. For desktop stuff I think it can't be
beat.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: puseaudio in Debian - is it ready?

2008-10-15 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:00:20PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Is anybody using pulseaudio in Debian? I am interested to know what is
 its status in Debian Sid and Lenny. If somebody has been successful in
 installing and running it, could you share your experience.

I tried it some time ago and gave up in frustration, but
recently gave it another try. I was specifically trying to
solve the problem of USB audio: different apps seemed to have
different ways of dealing with this, so I couldn't just plug
in USB speakers and go, I had to do one thing for the system
as a whole, then a different thing in one sound program, then
another thing for blah blah blah.

The PA installation and setup was a bit of a drag, though I
followed detailed instructions online. And now that it's
working, it's perfect; everything Just Works. There are a few
minor problems I'm having but on the whole I'm glad I did it.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: puseaudio in Debian - is it ready?

2008-10-15 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:04:27PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:00:20PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Is anybody using pulseaudio in Debian? I am interested to know what is
  its status in Debian Sid and Lenny. If somebody has been successful in
  installing and running it, could you share your experience.
  
  I tried it some time ago and gave up in frustration, but
  recently gave it another try. I was specifically trying to
  solve the problem of USB audio: different apps seemed to have
  different ways of dealing with this, so I couldn't just plug
  in USB speakers and go, I had to do one thing for the system
  as a whole, then a different thing in one sound program, then
  another thing for blah blah blah.
  
  The PA installation and setup was a bit of a drag, though I
  followed detailed instructions online. And now that it's
  working, it's perfect; everything Just Works. There are a few
  minor problems I'm having but on the whole I'm glad I did it.
  
  Jesse Sheidlower
 
 Having read what people posted, it appears that pulseaudio is on the
 right track. In this thread, only Paul has discouraged its use and
 Preston is having trouble (appears to be a hardware problem), and two
 others are having a ball of a time with pa.
 
 So if it works, it is wonderful. If it doesn't, it is a pain to get
 working. Moreover, it has networked sound. So I can play a movie on my
 media PC in my home lan over at my laptop -- if I understand pa correctly.
 
 Now if somebody can describe the steps which are fairly reliable to get
 it to work on a Debian machine, I might give it another shot in the not
 too distant future when I get some time.

The two documents I found to be exceptionally helpful (used
in combination) were an extensive Debian how-to at

http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=12497

and PA's own docs at

http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/PerfectSetup

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Update manager replacement?

2008-07-01 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
be updated, and it handles the updating.

On a new Lenny install, this is not present. I do have
something under System  Administration  Software Sources
that lets me choose how often it should check for updates, but
these don't actually seem to be displayed anywhere.  So I have
to use the Synaptic Package Manager manually.

Am I missing something, or is there a way to get the older
functionality back?

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Update manager replacement?

2008-07-01 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:10:13PM +0100, michael wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
  be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
  box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
  be updated, and it handles the updating.
  
  On a new Lenny install, this is not present. I do have
  something under System  Administration  Software Sources
  that lets me choose how often it should check for updates, but
  these don't actually seem to be displayed anywhere.  So I have
  to use the Synaptic Package Manager manually.
  
  Am I missing something, or is there a way to get the older
  functionality back?
 
 The orange box only appears if there's stuff to update, so if you've
 just installed the latest Lenny and the latest apps

Yeah, but every day I have minor things to update on the other
machine, but nothing on this one. And if I go to Synaptic, as
I did a few minutes ago, I learn that I have 122M worth of
updates to get through

So clearly I think there's something I need to be told, but 
someone is not telling me :-)

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shutting off graphical ssh agent popup?

2008-06-30 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:59:03AM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:59:21PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
 
  The ssh-agent is started by
  
  /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90x11-common_ssh-agent
  
  You can edit this file to make sure ssh-agent is not started
  automatically anymore with the X session.
 
 Or actually: remove use-ssh-agent from /etc/X11/Xsession.options .

Following up after a long time, but neither of these solutions
works. However, I asked on a Gnome list, and learned that this
functionality is provided by the Gnome keyring. To shut it
off, you can go to GConf and set
/apps/gnome-keyring/daemon-components/ssh to false.

Hope this helps someone else.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Shutting off graphical ssh agent popup?

2008-05-12 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running Lenny with Gnome on my ThinkPad. Previously, and
on all my other machines, when I launch an ssh command from
the command line, I would get an ssh password request on the
command line like

  Enter passphrase for key '/home/login_id/.ssh/id_rsa':

(If I ran ssh-agent myself, I might go straight through; OK,
but this should be my choice.)

After a recent update, I'm now getting a window that pops up
that reads Enter password to unlock private key. An
application wants access to the private key 'id_rsa', but it
is locked. I first have to kill this window before getting
back to the command line. How do I turn off this behavior? I
couldn't find anything in the Gnome menus that seems to
control this. I don't want Gnome deciding whether I should be
running an ssh agent or not.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Suspend problem on T60

2007-08-31 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running Etch on a Lenovo T60. Up to now, I haven't had a
problem suspending my computer by shutting the lid. This
morning, I tried to do this and it didn't work; it locked the
screensaver, but did not suspend. When I re-entered my
password, there was a message from Gnome Power Manager saying
that there was a suspend problem, and pointing to a link for
more info.

The link, to
http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-power-manager/faq.html , was
unhelpful; it suggested that either the hardware is
unsupported (clearly not true, as it's been working up to
now), or that I need to file a bug report, though the link to
this didn't work.

Any ideas what really might be causing this, and how to fix
the problem? I'm not sure if errors are logged, and where
they go, or any other way to evaluate what's happening. I
don't _think_ I upgraded or installed anything that might 
be conflicting with this.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Suspend problem on T60 (moved)

2007-08-31 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:11:07PM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I'm running Etch on a Lenovo T60. Up to now, I haven't had a
 problem suspending my computer by shutting the lid.

(I've now sent this message to the debian-laptop list, which I
should have done originally. Apologies for the duplicate post.)

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NetworkManager help, esp. after suspend

2007-08-30 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:49:46AM +0200, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 18:19 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  
  I'm a relatively new Debian user, running an up-to-date Etch on
  a ThinkPad T60.
 Welcome. I am running Debian on a T60 as well and am very pleased with 
 it so far.
 
 I guess you know http://thinkwiki.org ? It is a great source for 
 thinkpad related informations.

Yes, I've found it very useful in general, esp. when I was installing,
though it didn't have anything helpful for this.

  I'm having some trouble getting the NetworkManager app to work
 [ ... nm not working properly ... ]
  Is there anything I should be doing differently? The docs on
  NetworkManager are pretty slim. If it works as advertised it
  would be really convenient, but I do need to be able to come
  out of a suspend a join a network immediately.
 
 Try editing /etc/hibernate/common.conf and uncomment
 
 ### networkmanager
 EnableNMReconnect yes
 ^

I didn't have this line in that file, and it's not documented in
hibernate.conf.

 that might do the trick. That said it is not always working and i have 
 to click Enable Networking twice after wake-up occasionally. 
 
 You did configure nm as stated in:
 
 /usr/share/doc/network-manager/README.Debian

Yes, though I didn't find it too relevant. At least if it is relevant,
I'm not sure how. My /etc/network/interfaces is:

---
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The primary network interface
allow-hotplug eth0
---

The NM README file would suggest that eth1 (my wireless interface)
is managed by NM, since it's not explicitly listed here, and this
is in general the case (i.e. that NM manages eth1), though my
problem is the failure of NM to connect to a network after a resume,
and that network-admin _does_ manage to do this (though not reflected
in the NM panel app).

If the NM README file is telling me to do something else, I'm afraid
my reading comprehension skills are too poor to make sense of it :-(

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NetworkManager help, esp. after suspend

2007-08-29 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm a relatively new Debian user, running an up-to-date Etch on
a ThinkPad T60.

I'm having some trouble getting the NetworkManager app to work
the way it seems it should. In particular, after a suspend it
takes some time (a few minutes) to acknowledge that there are
network interfaces present, and then it is unable to connect
to any available network. I'm sitting fifteen feet away from a
WAP, and it (and others) shows in the list of available
networks, but when I try to join, it just spins for a while
before giving up.

I was able to get a wireless connection by running
network-admin, which connected instantly, but this seems not
to work with NetworkManager--my connection didn't show in
the status bar on the panel.

Interestingly, as I was typing this (having connected with
network-admin), the NetworkManager thing started spinning,
indicating that it was trying to join a network, and it did
successfully join my network. This was perhaps five or six
hours after my last suspend.

Is there anything I should be doing differently? The docs on
NetworkManager are pretty slim. If it works as advertised it
would be really convenient, but I do need to be able to come
out of a suspend a join a network immediately.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]