Re: Postfix + SASL + Amavis-new + ClamAV + Courier-(imap, imap-ssl, maildrop) problems.

2004-11-19 Thread Josh Metzler
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 07:12 pm, Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
 Hi all,
 I just got my system up and running (went from Mandrake to Debian) and
 i'm having problems getting Postfix to authenticate with saslauthd.
 This is on a Testing/Sarge system.
 To check that sasl is working, I used the testsaslauthd command:
 testsaslauthd -u my-username -p my-password
 -f /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd/mux
 and I get:
 0: OK Success.

 However when I do this:
 perl -MMIME::Base64 -e 'print encode_base64
 (my-username\0my-username\0my-password);'

 It returns this:
 dXNlcm5hbWUAdXNlcm5hbWUAcGFzc3dvcmQ=

 Then I:
 telnet server 25
 EHLO server

 Then issue this:
 AUTH PLAIN dXNlcm5hbWUAdXNlcm5hbWUAcGFzc3dvcmQ=

 I get:
 535 Error: authentication failed

 Here's a snip of my mail.log file:
 Begin Snip--
 Nov 16 15:57:56 server postfix/smtpd[11993]: starting TLS engine
 Nov 16 15:57:56 server postfix/smtpd[11993]: TLS engine: do need at least
 RSA _or_ DSA cert/key data
 Nov 16 15:57:56 server postfix/smtpd[11993]: connect from
 server.mydomain.com[192.168.10.100]
 Nov 16 15:58:56 server postfix/smtpd[11993]: warning: SASL authentication
 failure: Can only find author (no password)
 Nov 16 15:58:56 server postfix/smtpd[11993]: warning:
 server.mydomain.com[192.168.10.100]: SASL PLAIN authentication failed
 Nov 16 15:59:24 server postfix/smtpd[11993]: disconnect from
 server.mydomain.com[192.168.10.100]
 --End Snip

 I can't relay/send messages when logged in securely becayse I'm not being
 authentaced.
 I need some help getting this working.

 Thanks
 Ralph

I'm not sure what steps you have taken to get this setup, but I found 
http://lists.q-linux.com/pipermail/plug/2003-July/029503.html very helpful.

it looks like you have at least copied /var/run/saslauthd 
to /var/spool/postfix/var/run/.

Did you also then make /var/run/saslauthd a symlink to postfix's chroot?
Did you edit /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf to contain the authentication 
methods?
etc.

I hope this helps,
Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Moving from XP and looking for replacement programs

2004-04-18 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday 18 April 2004 05:49 pm, Ralph Katz wrote:
 On 04/17/04 10:00, Penbrock wrote:
  I want to make the jump from XP to Debian with KDE. I have a few
  programs I am trying to find Linux replacements for and am having a
  hard time. Can anyone help me find replacements for these programs?
 
  NewsRover (Auto download messages and attachments from selected
  newsgroups)
 
  DVD X copy (Backup DVD movies)
 
  Creative PlayStation  ( Used to rip audio CDs)

KAudioCreator

 
  Weather Bug (Local weather on the task bar)

KWeather (just current conditions, no weather forecast)
SuperKaramba (puts applets on your desktop) has some applets available to 
display the current conditions and forecast on your desktop (see 
www.kdelook.org).

 
  MailWasher (anti spam program)
 
  Ad-aware (spy ware remover)

Shouldn't be necessary - as most things you install will probably be open 
source, they shouldn't come with adware / spyware attached, and your 
browser won't let itself be hijacked.

 
  Nero Burn (CD/DVD bruning program)

k3b, as Micha mentioned.

 
  Norton Anti-virus ( Is this even needed with Linux?)
 
 
  DRIVERS FOR:
  Soundblaster Audigy
  Lexmark Z13

May be a problem? 
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=Lexmark-Z13

  Canon i560

This one, too - I don't even see it listed at linuxprinting.org


 linux.debian.user is a read-only gateway from
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  so very few saw your post.

 You can post without subscribing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
 just read the newsgroup.  It's what I do.

 I'm sure you'll get a response soon there.  Also, try
 http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

 Good luck.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: KDE 3.2 problems

2004-04-15 Thread Josh Metzler
On Thursday 15 April 2004 01:13 pm, GodMode wrote:
 hey guys
 i added deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian/ stable main

 did an apt-get update
 and apt-get upgrade ( which upgraded a few kde packages)
 but now i'm trying a
 apt-get install kde3
 apt-get install kde3.2
 apt-get install kde=3


 i dont know what command to use to get kde3 using apt-get after putting
 those two lines in the /etc/apt/sources.list file


 Can someone give me the command.

I use sid, but if I recall correctly, there is no meta-kde package at 
download.kde.org.  So,

apt-get install arts kdelibs kdebase

should get you the base packages.  Then you can install any other 
meta-packages you want (kdepim, kdenetwork, etc) or just install individual 
applications from there.

Josh

 Thanks
 GodMode.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Just Lost KDE Access

2004-04-02 Thread Josh Metzler
On Thursday 01 April 2004 06:03 pm, Scarletdown wrote:
 During my recent attempts to troubleshoot my previous gphoto2 problems,
 I did another apt-get upgrade.  That did not fix the problem, so I
 powered down to make sure the serial cable for the camera was secured.
 When I booted back up, I got to the gdm login screen.  I logged in, but
 found that KDE is no longer one of the session options, so I can now no
 longer get to my KDE desktop.

 Short of completely reinstalling the operating system to at least get
 everything back to the way it was before I started messing around with
 apt-get upgrade, is there any way I can configure the gdm login to once
 again recognize KDE as a valid session type?

I don't use gdm, but my guess is that this is related to bug #240980.  
According to the bug report gdm changed where it gets session types from in 
version 2.4.4.x.  2.4.4.7-1 was accepted into unstable on March 29.  Before 
that, 2.4.1.7-1 was the version in unstable.  So, this is probably the 
cause of your problem.  Downgrading gdm to the version in testing 
(2.4.1.7-1) would probably fix this for you, without you having to 
reinstall anything.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: System no longer usable

2004-03-14 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday 14 March 2004 08:21 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
 Something strange happened to my system last night.
 When I woke up this morning, the machine was completely
 locked up.  I cannot boot any linux kernel.  I have
 been rolling my own kernels for a while, and the
 machine has a 2.6.3 and 2.6.4, neither of which will
 boot.  It won't boot Knoppix, either from the CD-RW
 or the DVD-ROM drive.  The machine is running Sid.

 The strange thing is that WinXP boots OK (I have it
 installed in /dev/hda1 so that I can still play
 gamees).  WinXP seems to work fine even with the
 system heavily loaded.

 The machine is an Athlon XP 2500+, nForce2 mobo.

 Here is the end of the boot messages where it locks
 up:

 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 on /usr/local type xfs
 (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 on /home type
 xfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7 on
 /var/lib/systemimager type xfs (rw) usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs
 (rw)
 Starting hotplug subsystem (runlevel S): inputkernel driver evdev already
 loadedkernel driver evdev already loaded
 kernel driver evdev already loaded
  pci

 It just ends up with a blinking cursor after the pci.
 The machine is then totally hard locked.  If anyone
 can provide me some pointers I would really appreciate
 it.

 -Roberto

My system stopped at this point after updating hotplug two days ago, but 
Ctrl+C got me past it.  Yesterday's hotplug update fixed the problem for 
me.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: After XFree/KDE upgrades fonts shrunk about 5 points

2004-03-10 Thread Josh Metzler
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 07:43 pm, Brad Sims wrote:
 Any ideas? Gnome fonts share in the shrinkage g

 Everything looks normal in /etc... (ie I didn't change anything)

KDM no longer includes the -dpi 100 argument in /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers.  So, 
if you are starting things from KDM, that may be your problem.  I recommend 
setting the DisplaySize parameter in the Monitor section in your 
XF86Config-4.  This will result in X setting the true dpi of your monitor.

Josh Metzler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: upgrade to linux 2.6.3 causing strange behaviour

2004-02-28 Thread Josh Metzler
On Saturday 28 February 2004 01:36 pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
 I just installed the standard debian package kernel-image-2.6.3-1-k7 and
 booted from it, after previously running 2.6.1

 For the first few minutes it seems to have real problems with cpu loading.
 Starting up KDE causes the soundserver to fail because of to high a CPU
 loading, but even after this has failed the mouse is very jittery.

 I does eventually settle down, and now - some 5 mins after booting I seem
 to have a working system

 Anyone else see this, and is it a feature of linux 2.6.3, or a debian
 problem? --
 Alan Chandler
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have had a similar problem with kernel-image-2.6.2-1-686 and 
kernel-image-2.6.3-1-686.  In my case, kdm starts X.  At this point I can 
switch to a vt and there is ~0 cpu usage.  Once I log into KDE, though, the 
mouse is jerky and user cpu usage hovers at ~15%.  Top doesn't show any 
processes using the cpu, though.  See bug #232128 for more info and lots of 
various log files.

I haven't stayed in KDE for more than a minute or two, though, as the mouse is 
practically unusable.  I am currently using kernel-image-2.6.0-1-686, as it 
works fine for me.  I never tried a 2.6.1 kernel.

Josh Metzler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: X4.3 (Again)

2004-02-08 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday 08 February 2004 06:21 pm, Hank Marquardt wrote:
 I really don't want to spend hours putting my machine back together
 again if this doesn't work, so I figured I'd bounce this here ...

 I've added experimental to list.sources, I've update and even upgraded
 today so the system is current, here's my current X inventory:

 wizard:/home/hmarq/packages# dpkg -l | grep 4.2.1-16
 ii  libdps14.2.1-16   Display PostScript (DPS) client
 library
 ii  libxaw64.2.1-16   X Athena widget set library (version
 6)
 ii  libxaw74.2.1-16   X Athena widget set library
 ii  xbase-clients  4.2.1-16   miscellaneous X clients
 ii  xfonts-100dpi  4.2.1-16   100 dpi fonts for X
 ii  xfonts-75dpi   4.2.1-16   75 dpi fonts for X
 ii  xfonts-base4.2.1-16   standard fonts for X
 ii  xfonts-scalabl 4.2.1-16   scalable fonts for X
 ii  xfree86-common 4.2.1-16   X Window System (XFree86)
 infrastructure
 ii  xfs4.2.1-16   X font server
 ii  xlibmesa-dev   4.2.1-16   XFree86 Mesa development libraries
 pseudopac
 ii  xlibmesa-gl-de 4.2.1-16   Mesa 3D graphics library development
 files [
 ii  xlibmesa-glu-d 4.2.1-16   Mesa OpenGL utility library
 development file
 ii  xlibmesa3  4.2.1-16   XFree86 Mesa libraries pseudopackage

You shouldn't need any version of this anymore (it is just a pseudopackage in 
4.2.1 already).

 ii  xlibmesa3-gl   4.2.1-16   Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]

This is now xlibmesa-gl

 ii  xlibmesa3-glu  4.2.1-16   Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree86]

And this is xlibmesa-glu

 ii  xlibs  4.2.1-16   X Window System client libraries
 ii  xlibs-dev  4.2.1-16   X Window System client library
 development f
 ii  xlibs-pic  4.2.1-16   X Window System client extension
 library PIC
 ii  xnest  4.2.1-16   nested X server
 ii  xserver-common 4.2.1-16   files and utilities common to all X
 servers
 ii  xserver-xfree8 4.2.1-16   the XFree86 X server
 ii  xterm  4.2.1-16   X terminal emulator
 ii  xutils 4.2.1-16   X Window System utility programs

 What I'm concerned with is that if I enumerate all those in a 'apt-get
 --simulate install' statement I get concerned by the output of removing
 xlibmesa3 and xlibmesa3-gl ... it looks like all of KDE is
 linked/effected by that and while KDE isn't explicitly being removed I'm
 worried that it'll be hosed if I do the upgrade.

snip

The renamed xlibmesa-gl and -glu Provides: libgl1 and libglu1, which is what 
the xlibmesa3-gl[u] provided, and all your packages should depend on.  So, 
just use those instead of the 3 version, and you should be fine.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: plex86

2004-02-02 Thread Josh Metzler
On Monday 02 February 2004 03:22 am, Erich Waelde wrote:
 Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
  According to unstable's plex86 page
  http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/plex86, it has been
  superceded by bochs. But I thought plex86 was a virtual machine
  and bochs was an emulator. Isn't there a big difference?

Yes and no - there are two plex86 projects.  The original 
(savannah.nongnu.org/projects/plex86) was an x86 virtual machine project that 
would emulate an x86 machine on a Linux x86 host - I say was, because it 
apperas to be almost dead.  The fork (plex86.sourceforge.net) (by Kevin 
Lawton, the original author of both plex86 and Bochs) is a virtual machine 
that will run Linux on a Linux x86 host - not other operating systems which 
make use of corner cases.

Bochs is an x86 virtual machine that will run on any host architecture, and on 
Linux, Windows, or MacOS.  On Linux x86, it can supposedly make use of a 
plex86 kernel module to greatly speed things up.  I'm not clear on which 
plex86 this kernel module comes from, and I also have heard mixed reports of 
it either not working, or working but not making a big speed difference.


 yapp, I saw that, too. I tried bochs recently, and if I remember
 correctly, bochs fails to start, if plex86 is not available ---
 allthough bochs _suggests_ plex86-kernel-src, not _depends on_.
 Nosing around on the bochs website, it seems to me that including
 plex86 is a relatively new feature. The installation of
 plex86-kernel-src is cream, including compiling, packaging and
 installing the kernel modules --- on 2.4 kernel, that is. Anyway,
 I did not get it to work on my 2.6.x kernel.


 So, yes these are different items, but no, bochs won't do
 without, it seems.

 Cheers,
 Erich

Bochs runs just fine without plex86 - it used to panic if it didn't find it, 
but you can continue past this panic.  The most recent updates to the debian 
packages removed the panic in place of an informational message.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to boot new kernel 2.6.0

2003-12-29 Thread Josh Metzler
On Monday 29 December 2003 06:29 pm, Shahid Bhatti wrote:
 Hi All,
 I have installed the new kernel deb package 2.6.0 and after configuring
 lilo and rebooting I am not able to boot the machine successfully. I am
 getting the following error:
 
 VFS:Cannot open root device 301 or unknwon-block(3,1)
 Please append a correct root= boot option
 Kernel panic:VFS:Unable to mount root fs or unknown-block(3,1)
 -
 And the system just hangs there. I am using sid distribution.
 Any help from you will be highly appreciated, thanks.

 --SmB

I assume you mean the 2.6.0 kernel-image packages at 
http://people.debian.org/~herbert/

I had the same problem with the 686 optimized kernel.  I had an important 
error message above the ones you quoted, though, about trying to load the 
initrd which was 4224 blocks in size into a RAM disk that was 4096 blocks in 
size.  Obviously, this didn't work, so then the kernel couldn't load the file 
system that was supposed to be in this ram disk.

My solution (not necessarily the best one, but it appears to work -- I'm 
running the kernel now) was to add ramdisk_size=8192 to the append= line in 
my lilo.conf (see below).

Josh

 This is my simple /etc/lilo.conf here which looks like the following:
 --
 lba32
 boot=/dev/hda
 root=/dev/hda1
 install=/boot/boot.b
 map=/boot/map
 delay=20
 vga=normal
 default=Linux
 #image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.19
 image=/boot/vmlinuz
  label=Linux
  append=root=/dev/hda1

change this to be
  append=root=/dev/hda1 ramdisk_size=8192

  read-only
 image=/vmlinuz.old
  label=Linux\ (old)
  read-only
 #   restricted
 #   alias=1
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dictionaries in OpenOffice.org

2003-12-15 Thread Josh Metzler
On Monday 15 December 2003 02:28 pm, Kent West wrote:
 Dominique Deleris wrote:
  Hello,
 
  How do I activate spelling dictionaries in OOo? Is there a
  special package to be apt-get install-ed, or should I do it
  manually?
 
  I am seeking to activate english  french dictionaries.
 
  Thanks,

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/westk: apt-cache search nglish | grep ffice
 koffice-i18n-engb - British English (en_GB) i18n files for KOffice
 odontolinux - Dental office management software (PHP4 + PostgreSQL)
 openoffice.org-help-en - OpenOffice.org office suite help (English)
 openoffice.org-l10n-en - English US language package for openoffice.org
 openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-gb - English (GB) hyphenation pattern for
 OpenOffice.org
 openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us - English (US) hyphenation pattern for
 OpenOffice.org


 Mon Dec 15 13:26:18
 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/westk: apt-cache search rench | grep ffice
 koffice-i18n-fr - French (fr) i18n files for KOffice
 openoffice.org-help-fr - OpenOffice.org office suite help (French)
 openoffice.org-l10n-fr - French language package for openoffice.org


 I suspect you need to:
apt-get isntall openoffice.org-110n-en openoffice.org-110n-fr

This is a reasonable suspicion, but the description for openoffice.org-l10n-en 
clearly says that the spelling dictionaries are not included in this package, 
but in the myspell-* packages.

So, you probably need to
   apt-get install myspell-en-us myspell-fr

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-get removing perl libraries

2003-09-30 Thread Josh Metzler
On Monday 29 September 2003 05:57 pm, Victor Cain wrote:
 I'm running Debian SID and normally update packages daily.  The last update
 removed ten perl libraries and about 90 other packages dependent on them.

 I have two questions: Is there any thing I can do to fix this, or is it
 something that I just have to wait for?  Second, if this is a know problem,
 how could I have found that out without asking on this mailing list?  TIA.

1) I think this should have been fixed by yesterday's update (it was for me, 
anyway).

2) You must have done apt-get dist-upgrade to have apt-get remove packages, 
right?  My recommendation is to always do:

apt-get -u dist-upgrade

This will show any new packages that will be installed, and any current 
packages that will be removed, as well as which packages will be updated.  It 
will then give you an opportunity to cancel the upgrade (which is what I did 
so as to not uninstall lots of packages in this case).

 Here's what happens when I try to re-install those libraries (Note that I
 have perl 5.8.1-1 installed):
 - apt-get install libfinance-quote-perl libhtml-format-perl
 libhtml-tree-perl libnet-perl libnet-ph-perl libwww-perl libxml-grove-perl
 libxml-parser-perl libxml-perl libxml-twig-perl
 Reading Package Lists... Done
 Building Dependency Tree... Done
 Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
 requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
 distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
 or been moved out of Incoming.
 The following information may help to resolve the situation:

 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   libfinance-quote-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to
 be installed
  Depends: libhtml-tableextract-perl but it is not
 going to be installed
   libhtml-format-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to
 be installed
   libhtml-tree-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to be
 installed
  Depends: libhtml-parser-perl but it is not going to be
 installed
  Depends: libhtml-tagset-perl (= 3.02) but it is not
 going to be installed
   libnet-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to be
 installed libnet-ph-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going
 to be installed
   libwww-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to be
 installed Depends: libdigest-md5-perl
Depends: libmime-base64-perl (= 2.1) or
 perl (= 5.8) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: liburi-perl (= 1.10) but it is not going to be
 installed
Depends: libhtml-parser-perl (= 2.20) but it is not going
 to be installed
   libxml-grove-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to be
 installed
   libxml-parser-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.8.0-19) but it is not going to be
 installed
   Depends: liburi-perl but it is not going to be
 installed libxml-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.6.0-16) but it is not going to
 be installed libxml-twig-perl: Depends: perl (= 5.8.0-21) but it is not
 going to be installed
 E: Broken packages

If I remember correctly from my investigating, a perl-modules package had a 
versioned conflicts against libnet-perl  5.8.1, which caused libnet-perl to 
be uninstalled.  That in turn forced all of the other packages to be removed.  
libnet-perl 5.8.1 came into the repositories the next day, which fixed 
everything for me.


 Any help appreciated.

 --
 Victor R. Cain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I hope this helps,
Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fontconfig and TrueType Fonts in Unstable?

2003-09-30 Thread Josh Metzler
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 04:18 pm, Scott Thatcher wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm writing with a question that I believe concerns fontconfig in
 unstable.  I've searched every combination of keywords in Google and
 Google Groups that I can think of, but haven't found anything that can help
 me.  Here's my situation:

 I've tried to insert endashes, emdashes, curly quotes and other punctuation
 using Insert Special Character... in KWord, and they show up as empty boxes
 (regular characters are fine).  Other programs such as OpenOffice work
 fine.

I think this might be related to the font problems I (and others) have seen 
which I have assumed were related to qt 3.2.1.  See bugs #207959, #208718, 
and #209378.  If you can add comments to any of them, that would be great.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help upgrading kernel without net access (was: Trying Again)

2003-07-02 Thread Josh Metzler
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 04:01 pm, Abrasive wrote:
 I've had some trouble posting to this group, so I'm trying again with a
 different mail client.

In the future, I suggest that you use a more descriptive Subject: in your 
queries for help.  Many list readers glance at the subject to see if the 
e-mail is something they are interested in reading or not.

 Here's my problem.  I don't know what I'm doing...  But about my other
 problems...
 I just installed a fresh copy of Debian 3.0r1, and in order for my hardware
 to work, I need
 to upgrade the kernel to a 2.4.x version.
 I'm new to Debian, and I don't understand the package system, or installing
 the kernel
 the 'Debian Way'

When people talk about installing a kernel the 'Debian Way,' they usually mean 
compiling your own kernel.  Debian has its own method for doing that.  If you 
are using an i386 compatible machine, there are precompiled kernels that will 
probably work just fine for you and be easier to start with.

 The computer I'm using does not have Internet access yet either.  I can't
 get the NIC to
 work.  Although I've been told that the newer kernel supports that card.
 SO, which files do I need to download(kernel image, package, etc) that I
 can put on a CD
 and copy to the Debian machine.  

Note: directions follow on where to get the 2.4 kernel image, but, it may 
already be on your installation cd.  Check there first.

Assuming you are using an x86 machine, go to 
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages and search for kernel-image-2.4.18-1.  
From the search results, choose the kernel iamge that corresponds to your 
processor if you know it (386, 586tsc, 686, k6, or k7), or 
kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386 if you don't know your processor type.  On the 
information page for that package, it will tell you that this kernel image 
depends on initrd-tools (= 0.1.21), fileutils (= 4.0), and modutils (= 
2.3.12).  There is also a Go To Download Page button.  Go there to download 
the kernel image.  If you need any of the three dependencies, you can follow 
the links to their package information pages, and download the .deb file from 
there.

 And then what do I do with those files?

Now it is time to use dpkg.  Mount the cd.  Change to the directory which 
contains the .deb(s).  Then do (as root)

dpkg --install *.deb

This will probably give you a warning about adding a line to your lilo.conf 
for the initrd.  Add it in the image-/vmlinuz section like this:

image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
initrd=/initrd.img

And, run lilo.

 Thanks for the help on my previous questions, and thanks for the help with
 this one...

You're welcome.  I hope that this helps.

Josh Metzler


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: No sound - onboard VIA VT8233 AC97 [SOLVED]

2003-06-23 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:32 pm, Donald Spoon wrote:
 Josh Metzler wrote:
  -SNIP- 
  Ok, before writing the above, I had installed the stock debian
  kernel-image-2.4.20-3-686, along with alsa-modules-2.4.20-3-686,
  alsa-base, alsa-headers, and alsa-utils.  I had not run alsamixer to
  unmute the sound. I have now done so, but still no luck.
 
  alsamixer settings:
  Master: 52
  Master Mono: 52
  3D Control - Center: 53Josh Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  3D Control - Depth: 53
  3D Control - Switch: 0 (won't go up)
  PCM: 52
  Surround: 52
  Surround Down Mix: 0 (won't go up)

 I don't use alsamixer here... the mixer that comes with KDE worked fine
 for me.  Can't say much about these settings...

  sound related modules as listed by lspci:

 I hope you mean as reporded by lsmod... grin.

ah...yes :)


  snd-seq-oss29408   0  (unused)
  snd-seq-midi-event  2984   0  [snd-seq-oss]
  snd-seq36496   2  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event]
  snd-pcm-oss39972   0
  snd-mixer-oss  13592   0  [snd-pcm-oss]
  snd-via82xx13248   0
  snd-pcm60836   0  [snd-pcm-oss snd-via82xx]
  snd-timer  14212   0  [snd-seq snd-pcm]
  snd-ac97-codec 39752   0  [snd-via82xx]
  snd-page-alloc  5020   0  [snd-via82xx snd-pcm]
  snd-mpu401-uart 3296   0  [snd-via82xx]
  snd-rawmidi13312   0  [snd-mpu401-uart]snd-via82xx
  snd-seq-device  4192   0  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq snd-rawmidi]
  snd30244   0  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event snd-seq
  snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss snd-via82xx snd-pcm snd-timer snd-ac97-codec
  snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device]
  soundcore   3940   6  [snd]

 All of the above are the same as mine, except I don't have the
 snd-page-alloc listed.  This means that your setup of ALSA is probably
 OK if these modules are getting loaded automatically, AND if you indeed
 have the 8233/AC97 sound combo.  More on this later...

  As my speakers only have one jack and there are two places for speaker
  jacks on the back of the MB, I'm not certain which one I should use. 
  With the volume up on the speakers, I get static touching either one with
  the jack, but I also get no sound with it plugged into either one.  I
  picked the darker green one, which is closer in color to the speaker
  jack.snd-page-alloc

 Your MB should have three 1/8 inch phono jacks on the back... all in a
 row.  With these three jacks positioned to be viewed to the RIGHT of the
 keyboard/ps2 mouse pair, then going from LEFT to RIGHT they are:
 snd-via82xx
 1.  Line out   you should use this one with AMPLIFIED speakers!
 2.  Line in
 3.  Mic in


Thanks.  I should have thought to look in my MB docs.

  As I don't know much about how sound works in gnu/linux, it is possible
  I'm not testing it correctly.  Additional info is that I am running KDE. 
  There's no sound from it either, but I'm not sure how that might affect
  my ability to play sound from the command line.  I figure I should get
  sound working from the command line before working on KDE.

 The one remaining variable that I hinted about above is that your MB
 doesn't use the same chipset as mine.  I looked at the manual for your
 board posted at the Shuttle site and it says you have a VT8235 plus a
 RealTek ALC650 Codec ( a six channel AC97 style codec).  Obviously your
 hardware is different from mine, so the above settings may NOT be the
 correct ones...  The ALSA site says the snd-via82xx driver is ok...
 dunno.  Could you forward the real results of lspci?? ;)  I would be
 interested in what LINUX thinks you have

 Try firing up kde and see what happens.  You won't hurt anything, and it
 might give you some clues from it's complaints...

 Cheers,
 -Don Spoon-

Well, kmix did it for me.  I now have sound in KDE and on the command line.

The chipset numbering is a mystery to me still, though - the MB docs say 
VT8235 south bridge.  But, here is lspci (for real):

00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8374 P4X400 Host Controller/AGP 
Bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 PCI Bridge
00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 80)
00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 80)
00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 80)
00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82)
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge
00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586/B/686A/B PIPC Bus 
Master IDE (rev 06)
00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 AC97 Audio 
Controller (rev 50)
00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 74)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY 
[Radeon 7000/VE]

So, it seems to me that linux thinks the sound chip is a VT8233.  I'm 
satisfied now that sound works, but I'll do any more probing you want

Re: No sound - onboard VIA VT8233 AC97

2003-06-22 Thread Josh Metzler
On Saturday 21 June 2003 01:39 pm, Donald Spoon wrote:
 Josh Metzler wrote:
  I would appreciate any advice anyone can give me as to how to get sound
  working on my new box.
 
  The mother board is the Shuttle AV49N, which has onboard VIA VT8233 AC97
  sound.
 
  I have been testing with cat reflect.au  /dev/dsp.  (reflect.au is a
  sound that comes with kbounce.) This returns with no messages, but also
  with no sound coming out the speakers.
 
  Thanks in advance,
  Josh

 I have a different Shuttle MB model that has the VT8233 / AC97 chipset
 in it.  Sound is working OK with ALSA here.  I believe I had it working
 at one time with the kernel's built-in OSS drivers too, but I can only
 help with the ALSA setup now.

 Tell me what you have done so far, and which kernel version you are
 using.  The pre-compiled ALSA files only come compiled against a couple
 of the available kernels now.  If you want to use ALSA, you first must
 get one of these kernels installed or compile your own version of ALSA
 against your kernel from  the source.  I would advise going the
 pre-compiled route.

 Cheers,
 -Don Spoon-

Ok, before writing the above, I had installed the stock debian 
kernel-image-2.4.20-3-686, along with alsa-modules-2.4.20-3-686, alsa-base, 
alsa-headers, and alsa-utils.  I had not run alsamixer to unmute the sound.  
I have now done so, but still no luck.

alsamixer settings:
Master: 52
Master Mono: 52
3D Control - Center: 53
3D Control - Depth: 53
3D Control - Switch: 0 (won't go up)
PCM: 52
Surround: 52
Surround Down Mix: 0 (won't go up)

sound related modules as listed by lspci:
snd-seq-oss29408   0  (unused)
snd-seq-midi-event  2984   0  [snd-seq-oss]
snd-seq36496   2  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event]
snd-pcm-oss39972   0
snd-mixer-oss  13592   0  [snd-pcm-oss]
snd-via82xx13248   0
snd-pcm60836   0  [snd-pcm-oss snd-via82xx]
snd-timer  14212   0  [snd-seq snd-pcm]
snd-ac97-codec 39752   0  [snd-via82xx]
snd-page-alloc  5020   0  [snd-via82xx snd-pcm]
snd-mpu401-uart 3296   0  [snd-via82xx]
snd-rawmidi13312   0  [snd-mpu401-uart]
snd-seq-device  4192   0  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq snd-rawmidi]
snd30244   0  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event snd-seq 
snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss snd-via82xx snd-pcm snd-timer snd-ac97-codec 
snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device]
soundcore   3940   6  [snd]

As my speakers only have one jack and there are two places for speaker jacks 
on the back of the MB, I'm not certain which one I should use.  With the 
volume up on the speakers, I get static touching either one with the jack, 
but I also get no sound with it plugged into either one.  I picked the darker 
green one, which is closer in color to the speaker jack.

As I don't know much about how sound works in gnu/linux, it is possible I'm 
not testing it correctly.  Additional info is that I am running KDE.  There's 
no sound from it either, but I'm not sure how that might affect my ability to 
play sound from the command line.  I figure I should get sound working from 
the command line before working on KDE.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



No sound - onboard VIA VT8233 AC97

2003-06-21 Thread Josh Metzler
I would appreciate any advice anyone can give me as to how to get sound 
working on my new box.

The mother board is the Shuttle AV49N, which has onboard VIA VT8233 AC97 
sound.

I have been testing with cat reflect.au  /dev/dsp.  (reflect.au is a sound 
that comes with kbounce.) This returns with no messages, but also with no 
sound coming out the speakers.

Thanks in advance,
Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian Sound issue - Cannot load libvorbisfile file

2003-03-01 Thread Josh Metzler
On Saturday, March 01, 2003 09:25 am, Seneca wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:13:19AM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/sounds$ play phone.wav
  playing phone.wav
  sox: error while loading shared libraries: libvorbisfile.so.0: cannot
  open shared object file: No such file or directory

 Do you have the package libvorbis0 installed?

 --
 Seneca
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm running a testing machine with Ralf Nolden's stable backport of KDE 3.1, 
and I ran into the same problem with k3b.  I have libvorbis0 and 
libvorbisfile3 installed.

My solution (which has worked so far, though seems a bit iffy to me) was to 
create a symlink pointing libvorbisfile.so.0 to libvorbisfile.so.3.  Once I 
did this, it complained about libvorbisenc.so.0, so I did the same thing with 
it - libvorbisenc.so.2.

su root
cd /usr/lib
ln -s libvorbisfile.so.3 libvorbisfile.so.0
ln -s libvorbisenc.so.2 libvorbisenc.so.0

If this is a bad idea, someone please tell me.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Downgrading all packages to woody versions

2003-02-25 Thread Josh Metzler
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:45 am, David Gaudine wrote:
 I use woody, and I have a few packages that came from an early
 version of sid.  For these packages, dselect always shows me that the
 installed version is the same as the available version.  For example, my
 openssl and libssl packages show as installed version and available
 version 0.9.6d-1.  (Woody has 0.9.6c-2, sid has 0.9.7a-1).  I do know how
 to downgrade individual packages, and have already downgraded these
 two.  However, how can I find and downgrade all other packages where the
 installed version has a higher version number than the one in woody but
 is actually older?

 Here's how the problem happened:  When potato was stable I wanted to use
 woody so I specified unstable in sources.list.  Then, when woody became
 stable, I changed sources.list to specify stable.  The problem is, I
 made the change too late, so I picked up a some packages from sid.

 David

you could create an /etc/apt/preferences file with the following entry:

Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=stable
Pin-Priority: 1001

Then do an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade or dist-upgrade (or your usual 
update method).  This preferences file tells apt to give all packages of 
Debian origin (o=Debian) from the stable distribution (a=stable) a priority 
of 1001.  From my understanding, the default priority is 500, but a priority 
 1000 is necessary to get apt to downgrade a package.

This should downgrade any remaining unstable packages to stable.

man apt_preferences for more info.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: packages being kept back during upgrade

2003-02-23 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:10 am, Joris Huizer wrote:
...
 I've upgraded my (stable) debian machine some days ago
 - and again to be sure - but it looks like some
 packages are allways 'kept back'. This is the exact
 output I just got:

 --

 Reading Package Lists... Done
 Building Dependency Tree... Done
 The following packages have been kept back
   gconf2 libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common
 libgail-common libgail17
   libgconf2-4 libgnome2-0 libgnomecanvas2-0
 libgnomeui-0 libgnomevfs2-0
   libgnomevfs2-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common
 libgtkhtml2-0
   libpanel-applet2-0 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common
 libwnck4
   openoffice.org-bin openoffice.org-debian-files
 openoffice.org-l10n-en
   xlibmesa-dev yelp
 3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove
 and 23  not upgraded.
 Need to get 643kB of archives. After unpacking 81.9kB
 will be used.

 --

 What does it mean - and, should I do something to
 solve it ?

 Thanks for any input,

 Joris Huizer

I assume you did an
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
to get this result.

If so, it probably means that the packages that were kept back conflict with 
some other package on your system that would need to be removed to upgrade 
these.  To see which one, do

apt-get -s dist-upgrade

the dist-upgrade will remove the necessary packages to satisfy the conflicts.
the -s option makes apt-get pretend to do this, so you can see what package(s) 
will be removed.  If you are ok without the packages it wants to remove, go 
ahead and do

apt-get dist-upgrade.

Josh Metzler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]