Problem with jumbo frames and dhcp

2007-06-01 Thread Patrick Cummings
Hi, I'm trying to set a MTU of 9k for my gigabit network. All works well for 
that, however it doesn't work with DHCP. In the dhcpd.conf file on the server, 
I put option interface-mtu 9000; and then in the /etc/network/interfaces file 
on the clients I put iface ethx inet dhcp, however when I do ifup on the dhcp 
clients it says SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument. The only way around this is to 
not use a dhcp client and set everything manually. I think this might be a bug. 
I'm using the official DHCP servers and clients from the ISC, with debian etch 
stable AMD64.
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

problems while setting up a counter-strike: source server

2007-05-11 Thread Patrick Cummings

Hi, I have already sent this question, but it seems like the
formatting of my email go destroyed, so I decided to send it again
from another email address. Here is my original question:

Hi,
I want to run a counter-strike:source server.
I followed a guide online, it says I must run an utility called
'steam' that will update the server to the latest version.
I tried to run it, but I get an error:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l
total 21436
drwxr-x---  2 srcds srcds4096 2007-05-08 21:53 bin
drwxr-x--- 13 srcds srcds4096 2007-05-10 03:55 cstrike
drwxr-x---  7 srcds srcds  94 2007-05-08 21:53 hl2
-rwxr--r--  1 srcds srcds 3513408 2007-05-08 16:29 hldsupdatetool.bin
-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds1395 2007-05-10 01:58 InstallRecord.blob
-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds 305 2007-05-10 01:57 maplist
-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds  690024 2007-05-10 01:58 out
-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds3413 2005-04-07 17:07 readme.txt
-rwxr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds 105 2007-05-10 03:48 run
-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds  183860 2007-05-08 21:53 srcds_amd
-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds  183828 2007-05-08 21:53 srcds_i486
-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds  183828 2007-05-08 21:53 srcds_i686
-rwxr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds   57449 2007-05-10 01:57 srcds_master
-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds 344 2007-05-10 01:57 srcds_master.conf
-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds   10164 2007-05-08 21:53 srcds_run
-rwxr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds 7963393 2007-05-09 00:33 steam
-r-xr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds  358301 2005-11-16 00:28 test1.so
-r-xr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds  453372 2005-11-16 00:28 test2.so
-r-xr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds 8306090 2005-11-16 00:28 test3.so

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./steam -command update -game Counter-Strike
Source -dir . -verify_all -retry
-bash: ./steam: No such file or directory

also if I try to run the server it also shows an error:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./srcds_run -console -game cstrike +map cs_assault
Auto detecting CPU
Using AMD Optimised binary.
./srcds_run: line 362: ./srcds_amd: No such file or directory
Add -debug to the ./srcds_run command line to generate a debug.log
to help with solving this problem
Thu May 10 21:04:01 EDT 2007: Server Quit

I use Debian Etch stable AMD64
I already tried to replace all files in case they were corrupted.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




problems while setting up a counter-strike:source server

2007-05-10 Thread Patrick Cummings
Hi,
I want to run a counter-strike:source server.
I followed a guide online, it says I must run an utility called 'steam' that 
will update the server to the latest version.
I tried to run it, but I get an error:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -ltotal 21436drwxr-x---  2 srcds srcds4096 
2007-05-08 21:53 bindrwxr-x--- 13 srcds srcds4096 2007-05-10 03:55 
cstrikedrwxr-x---  7 srcds srcds  94 2007-05-08 21:53 hl2-rwxr--r--  1 
srcds srcds 3513408 2007-05-08 16:29 hldsupdatetool.bin-rw-r--r--  1 srcds 
srcds1395 2007-05-10 01:58 InstallRecord.blob-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds 
305 2007-05-10 01:57 maplist-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds  690024 2007-05-10 01:58 
out-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds3413 2005-04-07 17:07 readme.txt-rwxr-xr-x  1 
srcds srcds 105 2007-05-10 03:48 run-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds  183860 
2007-05-08 21:53 srcds_amd-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds  183828 2007-05-08 21:53 
srcds_i486-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds  183828 2007-05-08 21:53 
srcds_i686-rwxr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds   57449 2007-05-10 01:57 
srcds_master-rw-r--r--  1 srcds srcds 344 2007-05-10 01:57 
srcds_master.conf-rwxr-xr--  1 srcds srcds   10164 2007-05-08 21:53 
srcds_run-rwxr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds 7963393 2007-05-09 00:33 steam-r-xr-xr-x  1 
srcds srcds  358301 2005-11-16 00:28 test1.so-r-xr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds  453372 
2005-11-16 00:28 test2.so-r-xr-xr-x  1 srcds srcds 8306090 2005-11-16 00:28 
test3.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./steam -command update -game Counter-Strike Source -dir 
. -verify_all -retry-bash: ./steam: No such file or directory
also if I try to run the server it also shows an error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./srcds_run -console -game cstrike +map cs_assaultAuto 
detecting CPUUsing AMD Optimised binary../srcds_run: line 362: ./srcds_amd: No 
such file or directoryAdd -debug to the ./srcds_run command line to generate 
a debug.log to help with solving this problemThu May 10 21:04:01 EDT 2007: 
Server Quit
 
I use Debian Etch stable AMD64
I already tried to replace all files in case they were corrupted.
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: Problems with sarge to etch upgrade

2007-04-26 Thread Patrick Cummings
 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:50:34 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
 debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch 
 upgradehi patrick,  you have a problem with the sgi xfs filesystem. 
 i got currently the information there is a bug in linux--2.6 i am searching 
 for it here: bugs.debian.org/linux-2.6 for xfs  i had the same error on 
 two completly differently machine's (hardware was different). both had 
 debian sarge 2.6.8 with software-raid1 and lvm running.  solution, run your 
 rescue-cd (i worked with knoppix, but will test slax next time (smaller and 
 faster than knoppix ;) start your raiddevices and volumegroups and run 
 xfs_repair on that filesystem. maybe you have to repair without the journal, 
 by using the -L option.  looking for a solution, for the other server's 
 ;)  greetings thomas  --  View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-sarge-to-etch-upgrade-tf3551243.html#a10115414
  Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.   --  To 
 UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  with a subject of unsubscribe. 
 Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Thanks a lot! I finally had some time to take the machine down and repair the 
filesystems: that was the problem! It now works perfectly, and can do all the 
things where it crashed before. It found some error in my /tmp and my /var. I 
have now stress tested the filesystems to make sure they really work and they 
seem fine.
 
Here is what I did:
Boot from knoppix cd (I used 4.0)
ensure you have a network connection
edit /etc/apt/sources.list in knoppix to make sure it downloads only from sarge 
instead of stable unstable testing experimental etc.
aptitude update
aptitude install lvm2
lndir /lib/lvm-200/ /usr/sbin/
vgscanvgchange -a ythen I can use xfs_check and xfs_repair on 
/dev/VGname/LVname
 
I still don't know why this filesystem corruption occured while I was updating 
to etch...
 
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: Aptitude does not start

2007-04-26 Thread Patrick Cummings
 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:59:09 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
 debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Aptitude does not start  All the 
 sudden aptitude refuse to start. When I try to start it show little box 
 saying Loading cache and then exit with: Uncaught exception: 
 vs_progress.cc:38: virtual void vs_progress::paint(const style): Assertion 
 Percent=0  Percent=100 failed.  I apsolutlu have no idea what could 
 causye this.   --  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  with a 
 subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I'm having a similar problem
Uncaught exception: vs_progress.cc:38: virtual void vs_progress::paint(const 
style): Assertion Percent=0  Percent=100 failed.
This happens when the ncurses-based interface starts (it seems to be just after 
it displays Reading extended state information)
using aptitude in text-mode only (with commands like aptitude update) does 
work
aptitude 0.4.4 compiled at Mar 14 2007 06:46:28Compiler: g++ 4.1.2 20061115 
(prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
NCurses version: 5.5libsigc++ version: 2.0.17
debian is etch stable
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: Problems with sarge to etch upgrade

2007-04-20 Thread Patrick Cummings
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]CC: 
debian-user@lists.debian.orgSubject: RE: Problems with sarge to etch 
upgradeDate: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:37:37 -0400


 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: 
 debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch 
 upgrade To: debian-user@lists.debian.org  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED 
 MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1  Patrick Cummings escribió:  The computer 
 was working perfectly since almost 1 year before the  upgrade and as far 
 as I know there is no hardware problem with it.  Thanks for your time 
  Well, there's a problem with your RAM memory, try with another memory 
 and check if the error persists, that's a warning only, you can start 
 normally commenting the line you mentioned before but there'll be probably 
 some crashes because of this.  Regards, Jose Luis. - --  
 ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: 
 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve http://debian.org.ve - 
 irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. 
 http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 
 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 
 (GNU/Linux)  
 iD8DBQFGIm7POKCtW8rKsRgRArIeAKCyhaSL/syrnozQlet4B1rUVufJ0gCgsG4c 
 0u/DSNV8x+miA1tjy+Q3n00= =uqmx -END PGP SIGNATURE-   --  
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  with a subject of 
 unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I will check my RAM 
 with memtest when I can afford a downtime, however this problem appeared 
 exactly after I upgraded from sarge to etch, so I find it weird it might be 
 hardware related.Right now I'm running with my /tmp(was xfs) in the same 
 partition as /(currently ext3), and it is stable. 
 
So I finally had some time and tested the memory with memtest. I got 5 passes 
without errors, so I guess it was not that. It's also ECC memory.
However now the problem is getting worst. Sometimes it crashes ans I lose 
access to /var. It crashes every 30 minutes and I must restart the computer.
Is there any way to get out of this without a clean install? I think that's 
what I will do. That will be very complex since there is so much on this 
computer. I guess I should have continued with sarge.
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: permissions (samba and nfsd)

2007-04-17 Thread Patrick Cummings
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: 
 permissions (samba and nfsd) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:45:13 +0200  Hi 
 folks :-)  I've on my debian stable:  drwxrwx--T 6 root samba 4096 Nov 30 
 17:13 /samba  so, only samba's users can read and write into the samba dir 
 (no system user).  Now, i've installed also nfsd, but when the clients try 
 to mount the same dir,  the permissions are:  drwxrwx--T 6 root 1039 4096 
 2006-11-30 17:13 samba  cd samba Permission denied  Can i resolve this 
 problem?  Thanks! Pol   --  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Make sure that the values in `/etc/group` match for every machine that will use 
nfs. Here, 1039 is the group id of the samba group on your server. 1039 is 
undefined on your clients.
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: Problems with sarge to etch upgrade

2007-04-15 Thread Patrick Cummings
 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: 
 debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch 
 upgrade To: debian-user@lists.debian.org  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED 
 MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1  Patrick Cummings escribió:  The computer was 
 working perfectly since almost 1 year before the  upgrade and as far as I 
 know there is no hardware problem with it.  Thanks for your time  Well, 
 there's a problem with your RAM memory, try with another memory and check if 
 the error persists, that's a warning only, you can start normally commenting 
 the line you mentioned before but there'll be probably some crashes because 
 of this.  Regards, Jose Luis. - --  ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 
 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve 
 http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San 
 Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 
 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 
 GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)  
 iD8DBQFGIm7POKCtW8rKsRgRArIeAKCyhaSL/syrnozQlet4B1rUVufJ0gCgsG4c 
 0u/DSNV8x+miA1tjy+Q3n00= =uqmx -END PGP SIGNATURE-   --  To 
 UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  with a subject of unsubscribe. 
 Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
I will check my RAM with memtest when I can afford a downtime, however this 
problem appeared exactly after I upgraded from sarge to etch, so I find it 
weird it might be hardware related.
Right now I'm running with my /tmp(was xfs) in the same partition as 
/(currently ext3), and it is stable.
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: Problems with sarge to etch upgrade

2007-04-12 Thread Patrick Cummings


 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:58:56 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch 
 upgrade  Patrick Cummings wrote:  I made a complete capture of the 
 console output,  I would love to know how you did that! Maybe I'm just a 
 Debian n00b...  Michael 
This is not something I did with debian. I simply pasted the text from a serial 
console. You can connect two computers' serial ports together using a null 
modem cable and then use it to control the computer using a terminal program on 
the second machine. All the text from the dmesg and all that stuff goes to the 
serial console because I set it as my default terminal.
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

RE: Problems with sarge to etch upgrade

2007-04-12 Thread Patrick Cummings
 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:37:55 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 
 Problems with sarge to etch upgrade From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Tue, Apr 
 10, 2007 at 02:00:09AM -0400, Patrick Cummings wrote:  Hello list, I just 
 upgraded from sarge to etch using apt-get  dist-upgrade. I have a few 
 problems. The OS won't completely start. I  made a complete capture of the 
 console output, if anybody is kind  enough to try to understand what is 
 happening and help me. [snip a fine looking dmesg]  I can 
 get the computer to start perfectly if I comment out everything  in the 
 start section from /etc/init.d/x11-common and  /etc/init.d/xfree86-common 
 I find it weird that I have a problem from  theses files since I don't use 
 x11 at all.If you don't use x11 then purge anything related to X.  
 Did you follow the upgrade instructions in the release notes? If you didn't, 
 then you're not alone. If you did and still had a problem, then it could 
 indicate a deficiency in the notes warranting a bug report.  Doug.  
Ok, I did purge x11 and it fixed the problem. The gjc compiler was depending on 
it, so it got purged too.
However, now the message I was getting after the boot appears at random times 
while the computer is running. Every time the message appears I need to restart 
the computer, or else it will only partially work. For example, after the 
message appears, it is impossible to access some samba shares stored locally on 
this computer.
Here it is:
 
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 
0060
printing eip:
f8be4908
*pde = 
Oops:  [#1]
SMP 
Modules linked in: nfs nfsd exportfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc ipv6 bridge 
ipt_MASQUERADE xt_limit xt_multiport ipt_LOG xt_tcpudp xt_state iptable_mangle 
iptable_nat ip_nat ip_conntrack nfnetlink iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables xfs 
raid0 md_mod fuse ide_disk evdev psmouse i2c_piix4 serio_raw i2c_core floppy 
pcspkr parport_pc parport rtc shpchp pci_hotplug sworks_agp agpgart sg ext3 jbd 
mbcache dm_mirror dm_snapshot dm_mod ide_cd cdrom sd_mod serverworks sata_sil 
ohci_hcd ips generic libata e1000 ide_core usbcore scsi_mod tlan e100 mii 
thermal processor fan
CPU: 1
EIP: 0060:[f8be4908] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.18-4-686 #1) 
EIP is at xfs_inobt_update+0x2b/0x87 [xfs]
eax: 0001 ebx: f7d51812 ecx: bf8697df edx: 
esi: c013fb56 edi: 0008 ebp:  esp: f64d1b24
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process vim (pid: 10122, ti=f64d task=f6d17550 task.ti=f64d)
Stack: f58bac08  0001 c013fb57 f7d51812 0004 f58bac08 0001 
f8be1f2d c013fb56 0008  0080  f5fde278 12000286 
0008 0001 f7d42400  f7d51800  0001  
Call Trace:
[c013fb57] handle_IRQ_event+0x23/0x49
[f8be1f2d] xfs_dialloc+0x10ce/0x123d [xfs]
[c013fb56] handle_IRQ_event+0x22/0x49
[c016a102] do_select+0x3b7/0x3d4
[c011669e] __wake_up+0x2a/0x3d
[c013fb56] handle_IRQ_event+0x22/0x49
[c013fc54] __do_IRQ+0xd7/0xe8
[f8be8e37] xfs_ialloc+0x41/0x453 [xfs]
[f8bfb561] xfs_dir_ialloc+0x62/0x241 [xfs]
[f8c02579] xfs_mkdir+0x290/0x561 [xfs]
[f8bb87d7] xfs_acl_get_attr+0x3b/0x5c [xfs]
[f8c098d8] xfs_vn_mknod+0x1c0/0x380 [xfs]
[c013fb57] handle_IRQ_event+0x23/0x49
[c0112613] end_level_ioapic_vector+0x14/0x7d
[c013fc54] __do_IRQ+0xd7/0xe8
[c01050ea] do_IRQ+0x48/0x52
[c01036b6] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[f8bd7765] xfs_dir_lookup+0x91/0xff [xfs]
[f8c09dc2] xfs_vn_permission+0xf/0x13 [xfs]
[c0165571] permission+0xa3/0xb6
[f8c09aa2] xfs_vn_mkdir+0xa/0xc [xfs]
[c016588e] vfs_mkdir+0xba/0xf7
[c0167d56] sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xbb
[c01050ea] do_IRQ+0x48/0x52
[c01036b6] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[c0167d99] sys_mkdir+0xf/0x13
[c0102c11] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x79
Code: 55 57 56 53 83 ec 10 89 54 24 08 8b 74 24 24 89 04 24 8b 7c 24 28 8b 50 
24 8b 40 44 0f c9 89 c5 89 44 24 04 c1 e5 04 8b 44 24 08 03 6a 60 0f c8 89 44 
24 08 89 45 00 89 f8 89 4d 04 89 f1 0f c9 
EIP: [f8be4908] xfs_inobt_update+0x2b/0x87 [xfs] SS:ESP 0068:f64d1b24
 
What does this kind of message means exactly? What can I do to find what kind 
of problem it is?
I think it might be related with /tmp, because everytime this message appears 
my shells freezes if I try to do any accesses in /tmp. For example, man does 
not work because it writes to /tmp.
 
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

Problems with sarge to etch upgrade

2007-04-10 Thread Patrick Cummings
Hello list,
I just upgraded from sarge to etch using apt-get dist-upgrade. I have a few 
problems. The OS won't completely start. I made a complete capture of the 
console output, if anybody is kind enough to try to understand what is 
happening and help me.
 
 
 
Linux version 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc 
version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 
17:17:36 UTC 2007BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820:  - 
0009d400 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009d400 - 000a 
(reserved) BIOS-e820: 000e4400 - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 
0010 - 4fff (usable) BIOS-e820: 4fff - 
4c00 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 4c00 - 5000 
(ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec1 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 
fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fff0 - 
0001 (reserved)383MB HIGHMEM available.896MB LOWMEM available.found 
SMP MP-table at 000f6900DMI 2.3 present.ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x404ACPI: 
LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)Processor #0 6:8 APIC version 
17ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x03] enabled)Processor #3 6:8 APIC 
version 17ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1])ACPI: LAPIC_NMI 
(acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1])ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x04] address[0xfec0] 
gsi_base[0])IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 4, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-15ACPI: 
IOAPIC (id[0x05] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[16])IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 5, version 
17, address 0xfec01000, GSI 16-31ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 
31 low level)Enabling APIC mode:  Flat.  Using 2 I/O APICsUsing ACPI (MADT) for 
SMP configuration informationAllocating PCI resources starting at 6000 
(gap: 5000:aec0)Detected 999.840 MHz processor.Built 1 zonelists.  
Total pages: 327664Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 
console=ttyS1,57600n8 Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.Enabling 
unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.Initializing CPU#0PID hash table 
entries: 4096 (order: 12, 16384 bytes)Console: colour VGA+ 80x25Dentry cache 
hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)Inode-cache hash table 
entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)Memory: 1290548k/1310656k available 
(1544k kernel code, 18860k reserved, 577k data, 196k init, 393152k 
highmem)Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor 
mode... Ok.Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 2000.58 BogoMIPS 
(lpj=4001174)Security Framework v1.0.0 initializedSELinux:  Disabled at 
boot.Capability LSM initializedMount-cache hash table entries: 512CPU: L1 I 
cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16KCPU: L2 cache: 256KIntel machine check architecture 
supported.Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.Compat vDSO mapped to 
e000.Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.SMP alternatives: switching to UP 
codeACPI: Core revision 20060707CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 
0aSMP alternatives: switching to SMP codeBooting processor 1/0 eip 
3000Initializing CPU#1Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 1999.60 
BogoMIPS (lpj=3999219)CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16KCPU: L2 cache: 
256KIntel machine check architecture supported.Intel machine check reporting 
enabled on CPU#1.CPU1: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 0aTotal of 2 
processors activated (4000.19 BogoMIPS).ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs..TIMER: 
vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=0 apic2=-1 pin2=-1checking TSC synchronization across 
2 CPUs: passed.Brought up 2 CPUsmigration_cost=821checking if image is 
initramfs... it isFreeing initrd memory: 5100k freedNET: Registered protocol 
family 16ACPI: bus type pci registeredPCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 
0xfdb57, last bus=3PCI: Using configuration type 1Setting up standard PCI 
resourcesACPI: Interpreter enabledACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routingACPI: 
PCI Interrupt Link [IR1] (IRQs 5 10) *9ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN0E] (IRQs 
*14)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN10] (IRQs *16)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN11] 
(IRQs *17)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN12] (IRQs *18)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link 
[LN13] (IRQs *19)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN14] (IRQs *20)ACPI: PCI Interrupt 
Link [LN15] (IRQs *21)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN16] (IRQs *22)ACPI: PCI 
Interrupt Link [LN17] (IRQs *23)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN18] (IRQs *24)ACPI: 
PCI Interrupt Link [LN19] (IRQs *25)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN1A] (IRQs 
*26)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN1B] (IRQs *27)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN1C] 
(IRQs *28)ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LN1D] (IRQs *29)ACPI: PCI Root Bridge 
[PCI0] (:00)PCI: Firmware left :00:03.0 e100 interrupts enabled, 
disablingPCI: Firmware left :00:07.0 e100 interrupts enabled, disablingPCI: 
Firmware left :02:04.0 e100 interrupts enabled, disablingPCI: Firmware left 
:02:05.0 e100 interrupts enabled, disablingACPI: Embedded Controller [EC0] 
(gpe 4) interrupt