Re: Wymuszanie YES (permanentne) w fsck
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 05:41:54PM +0200, Adrian Siemieniak wrote: Mozna bez rekompilacji fsck sprawic by ZAWSZE naprawialo dyski (nawet -a/-y Nie wiem czy to zadziala, ale moze yes | fsck /dev/hdx -- Piotrek (@ ~) irc: #debian.pl Mors Drosophilis melanogastribus! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ssh
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Michal Niezbecki wrote: Witam Chcialbym sie upewnic u fachmanow :) To nie do mnie, ale odpowiem :) Czy debianowe non-US/m ssh 1.2.3-9.3 jest bezpieczne? Tak, zreszta czytales juz pewnie DSA... -- Piotrek (@ ~) irc: #Debian.pl Mors Drosophilis melanogastribus!
Re: IRC kanal #debian
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 06:19:17PM +0100, Pablo wrote:
Witam,
Informuję, że w sieci POLNET (www.ircnet.pl) powstał nowy kanał
#debian, na którym mamy jeszcze parę wakatów dla opów :-.
Pewnie zajrze, chocby z ciekawosci :)
Bardzo polecam, na serwerach *.ircnet.pl są mechanizmy ochrony
kanałów i nicków co jest bardzo przyjazne dla użytkownika.
iirc efnet tez ma {chan,nick}servy?
Jeden serwer tej sieci juz jest w polsce (irc.efnet.pl iirc), co takiego
ma polnet, ze oplaca sie stawiac serwery w zupelnie nowej sieci, niz
dolaczyc sie do istniejacej?
Przy okazji, na ircnecie jest dosc duzy #debian.pl :)
--
Piotrek (@ ~)
irc: #debian.pl
Mors Drosophilis melanogastribus!
Re: gcc work .........no
On Mon, 02 Jul 2001, seeb27 wrote: Witam wszystkich: debian-user-polish! mojhost:/usr/src/mysql-3.23.39# gcc gcc: No input files checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. dlaczego nie moze utworzyc wykonywalnych plikow ? o co chodzi bo juz zbaranialem z gory dzieki Zobacz np. http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=compiler+cannot+create+executablesnum=100as_scoring=rbtnG=Google+Searchas_epq=as_oq=as_eq=as_ugroup=pl.%2Aas_usubject=as_uauthors=as_umsgid=lr=as_drrb=qas_qdr=as_mind=29as_minm=3as_miny=1995as_maxd=3as_maxm=7as_maxy=2001 -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
searching for old releases of debian
[Please CC me on replays] Hi On archive.debian.org the oldest release is buzz. I have debian 0.93r6, but only binaries for i386. Does anybody has any older releases? Thanks :) -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
lists.debian.org/search.html nie działa poprawn ie?
Hej Szukanie np. experimental;postgresql w debian-user zwraca 3 rezultaty. Szukanie experimental;postgres.* zwraca 0, co w.g mnie nie jest poprawne. Czy to ja robię coś nie tak, czy to wina systemu ? -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: lists.debian.org/search.html nie działa poprawn ie?
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Michal Politowski wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:28:34 +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: Szukanie np. experimental;postgresql w debian-user zwraca 3 rezultaty. Szukanie experimental;postgres.* zwraca 0, co w.g mnie nie jest poprawne. Czy to ja robię coś nie tak, czy to wina systemu ? Wygląda to na feature glimpse'a. http://lists.debian.org/glimpse.html: Since the index is word based, a regular expression must match words that appear in the index for glimpse to find it. Glimpse first strips the regular expression from all non-alphabetic characters, and searches the index for all remaining words. It then applies the regular expression matching algorithm to the files found in the index. For example, glimpse `abc.*xyz' will search the index for all files that contain both `abc' and `xyz', and then search directly for `abc.*xyz' in those files. (If you use glimpse -w `abc.*xyz', then `abcxyz' will not be found, because glimpse will think that abc ^ and xyz need to be matches to whole words.) Zauważ '-w' czyli 'match on complete words'. Nie wiem jak to jest robione przy przeszukiwaniu archiwów. Jeśli nie dają '-w', to powinien znaleźć wyrażenie... A jeśli dają to to jest imo błąd. -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: lists.debian.org/search.html nie działa poprawn ie?
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Michal Politowski wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:28:34 +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: Szukanie np. experimental;postgresql w debian-user zwraca 3 rezultaty. Szukanie experimental;postgres.* zwraca 0, co w.g mnie nie jest poprawne. Czy to ja robię coś nie tak, czy to wina systemu ? Wygląda to na feature glimpse'a. http://lists.debian.org/glimpse.html: Since the index is word based, a regular expression must match words that appear in the index for glimpse to find it. Glimpse first strips the regular expression from all non-alphabetic characters, and searches the index for all remaining words. It then applies the regular expression matching algorithm to the files found in the index. For example, glimpse `abc.*xyz' will search the index for all files that contain both `abc' and `xyz', and then search directly for `abc.*xyz' in those files. (If you use glimpse -w `abc.*xyz', then `abcxyz' will not be found, because glimpse will think that abc ^ and xyz need to be matches to whole words.) Zauważ '-w' czyli 'match on complete words'. Nie wiem jak to jest robione przy przeszukiwaniu archiwów. Jeśli nie dają '-w', to powinien znaleźć wyrażenie... A jeśli dają to to jest imo błąd. Aha, pole 'partial match' mam zanaczone. -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: Mozilla 0.9.1 i flash
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:10:37PM +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: U mnie niestety nie chce pluginu wykrywać, obojętnie czy instaluję go w $HOME czy ogólnie :( Jak wrzuciłem do /usr/lib/mozilla-0.9.1/plugins/ to poszło. Nie wiem od czego to zależy, ale kilka innych osób też ma problemy: http://www.debianhelp.org/viewtopic.php?topic=157forum=12 Chcę jeszcze sprawdzic orginalna mozille z mozilla.org i jak będzie działać to zgłoszę buga. Inna sprawa, że są jaja z esd i trzeba trochę pokombinować, żeby się po tym w ogóle uruchomiła. Hmm nie korzystam z esd więc nie zauważyłem problemów :) -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Mozilla 0.9.1 i flash
Hej Używał już ktoś nowej mozilli 0.9.1 od Mytha lub Katame z pluginem macromedia flash ? U mnie niestety nie chce pluginu wykrywać, obojętnie czy instaluję go w $HOME czy ogólnie :( A na Redhacie chodzi, przypuszczam więc, że to albo problem z tym jednym komputerem, albo ogólnie Debian-specyfic... Chętnie wrócę do 0.9.0 jeśli tylko ktoś powie skąd jeszcze można sciągnąć deby. -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: Mozilla dla Debian Potato.
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Miroslaw Sankowski wrote: Witam grupowiczów. Czy wiecie coś na temat dostępności pakietów .deb dla potato z Mozillą nowszą niż M18? Jeżeli tak, to proszę o informację. URL:http://pluto.tuwien.ac.at/~robbe/debian/stable/mozilla/ deb http://pluto.tuwien.ac.at/~robbe/debian/stable mozilla/ deb-src http://pluto.tuwien.ac.at/~robbe/debian/stable mozilla/ -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: ftp.pwr.wroc.pl
On Tue, 08 May 2001, Artur Gorniak wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:57:45AM +0200, Jakub Ambrożewicz wrote: netselect ftp.pwr.wroc.pl ftp.pl.debian.org Hmm od 2 (?) dni nie moge sie tam dostac... -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: ftp.pwr.wroc.pl
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Jakub Ambrożewicz wrote: Hmm od 2 (?) dni nie moge sie tam dostac... Tam to gdzie? :-) ftp.pwr.wroc.pl -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: [OT] pogoda
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Jakub Ambrozewicz wrote: Mam takie male pytanie - ma to byc lista o Debianie czy do pogaduch o pogodzie ? Bo jesli to drugie to ... :-))) Jakby to ujac, jesli na liscie nic nie ma, znaczy ze listy nie ma. A skoro zostala powolana to chyba dobrze ze cos sie kreci? Nawet jesli ma to sluzyc tylko wymianie pogladów miedzy polskimi uzytkownikami debiana i zaciesnianiu wiezi :-) Ok. Jak ma byc cos o debianie to prosze :) Chcialem zeby ktos zdebianizowal Contents*.gz, ale ze nikt sie nie kwapil to zrobilem sam. http://pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl/~piotr/contents.deb.html Ale ostrzegam ze nie wiem czy ktos poza mna je testowal :) -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: I have apt on RH, now i want dselect (or capt or sth. like that)
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Leen Besselink wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: I thought it's clear. There are two computers - one in my home (debian, slow modem connection) and one where i study (RH, fast connection). Now, i can take my /var/lib/dpkg/status file, compress it (~100KB) and send it to RH. There i could choose what packages i want (using dselect), download them (apt-get -d dselect-upgrade), take them to my home and install. Why don't you just use masqurading firewalling ?? First you need to have masquerading setup in your RH's kernel, then you add one rule to your ipchains, ipfwadm or iptables (depending on your RH's kernel version) and add it to the startup. Then just point your gateway on your Debian machine at your RH machine. This seems like a lot easier way. And everytime you want the debian machine to use his slow connection, change the Debian's default route over the modem (PPP?) link. If i understand you properly, debian machine should use RH as proxy server ? This doesn't change anything, because there still be slow connection from debian to RH. -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: I have apt on RH, now i want dselect (or capt or sth. like that)
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:07:57AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:27:40PM -0400, David Z. Maze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Karsten M Self kmself@ix.netcom.com writes: KMS On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: PK I have installed apt on RedHat, it works ok (e.g apt-get update PK apt-get -d install sth) KMS KMS Using two different package management systems on a single system KMS is a ***BAD*** idea. You are violating the fundamental advantage KMS of either system: single-point, centralized coordination of KMS packages and dependencies on the system. man apt-zip? I haven't used it, but my understanding is that this is what it's for. You make your requests on the Debian box, then sneakernet storage from some other box, though I don't know what it wants on it. No, my question was different. Downloading, moving and installing is not a problem (i'm following /usr/share/doc/apt/offline.txt.gz). But now i'd like to have dselect, console-apt or aptitiude installed on RH system. I tried to install capt, but it failed (see my first mail) I don't know whether i need dpkg installed first or not (iirc there is dpkg for non-debian systems). Ok. See my previous response quoted above. ***WHY*** are you trying to install apt on a Red Hat system. If you're planning to manage your RH system through apt, I strongly discourage it. I thought it's clear. There are two computers - one in my home (debian, slow modem connection) and one where i study (RH, fast connection). Now, i can take my /var/lib/dpkg/status file, compress it (~100KB) and send it to RH. There i could choose what packages i want (using dselect), download them (apt-get -d dselect-upgrade), take them to my home and install. -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: I have apt on RH, now i want dselect (or capt or sth. like that)
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:07:57AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:27:40PM -0400, David Z. Maze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Karsten M Self kmself@ix.netcom.com writes: KMS On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: PK I have installed apt on RedHat, it works ok (e.g apt-get update PK apt-get -d install sth) KMS KMS Using two different package management systems on a single system KMS is a ***BAD*** idea. You are violating the fundamental advantage KMS of either system: single-point, centralized coordination of KMS packages and dependencies on the system. It sounds like what he's actually trying to do is to install APT on a Not trying, it works ok. :) machine with good connectivity, and using APT in download-only mode to download packages to local disk. He then copies the files to some other medium, uses SneakerNet to bring them over to his machine without connectivity, and installs them locally. This is all well and good and reasonable, but I don't know how to answer his question. :-) man apt-zip? I haven't used it, but my understanding is that this is what it's for. You make your requests on the Debian box, then sneakernet storage from some other box, though I don't know what it wants on it. No, my question was different. Downloading, moving and installing is not a problem (i'm following /usr/share/doc/apt/offline.txt.gz). But now i'd like to have dselect, console-apt or aptitiude installed on RH system. I tried to install capt, but it failed (see my first mail) I don't know whether i need dpkg installed first or not (iirc there is dpkg for non-debian systems). Thanks -- Piotrek (@ ~) irc: #Debian.pl
I have apt on RH, now i want dselect (or capt or sth. like that)
Hi I have installed apt on RedHat, it works ok (e.g apt-get update apt-get -d install sth) Now i'd like to have sth. like dselect, do choose packages in dselect and then apt-get dselect-upgrade. Do i need install dpkg first ? I tried to compile capt, but there were some errors: c++ -c -MD -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_REENTRANT -I. -Iinit -fPIC -DPIC -g -O2 -o func/apt.o func/apt.cc In file included from func/apt.cc:5: init/std.h:22: apt-pkg/configuration.h: No such file or directory [many other missing files] In file included from func/apt.cc:8: interface/acquire_status.h:13: apt-pkg/acquire.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/g++-2/std/bastring.h:36, from /usr/include/g++-2/string:6, from interface/wrappers.h:5, from interface/dialogs.h:5, from func/apt.cc:9: /usr/include/g++-2/std/straits.h:84: macro `move' used with too many (3) args and more... TIA -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
Re: apt on non-debian system
On Fri, 06 Oct 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: I'd like to install apt on RH. I don't want to install deb's on RH. I want only use it as it reads in /usr/share/doc/apt/offline.txt (apt-get update apt-get -d dist-upgrade with state file from other, debian system) So, is it possibile ? Sure, just grab the source and do: make startup I had to modify Makefile and exculde comiling docs, but it's probably local problem, not with source. make cd build/bin export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` ./apt-get You'll need to use the configuration options that offline.txt indicates so that you can use a custom sources.list that is not in /etc/apt/. And i have to change some other things like Dir::Bin::methods and other, but i think it will work. Now it's breaking on: E: Could not open file /var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin - open (2 No such file or directory) E: Could not open file /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin - open (2 No such file or directory) E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. Do i need *.cache.bin files too ? Thx -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl
apt on non-debian system
Hi I'd like to install apt on RH. I don't want to install deb's on RH. I want only use it as it reads in /usr/share/doc/apt/offline.txt (apt-get update apt-get -d dist-upgrade with state file from other, debian system) So, is it possibile ? -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
Re: pppd changes permission to /dev/ttyS1 (my modem)
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, John Hasler wrote: Piotrek writes: So say how it should be, but don't say me how i should do it. When you ask for free help on a mailing list or newsgroup you get the answers people see fit to give you. Statements such as this just might result in someone who could answer your questions deciding to ignore you You're right. If i didn't wrote my mail at 1 am, i think i would use other words. I read his mail once more and it looks different than yesterday (or rather todays night) But let me quote: Debian has to be built for people who *do* care, so advice that compromises security is not to be welcomed here For me it says sth like this: Debian is only for users who care about security, so if you don't, we don't want you here. I hope others don't think like that. This irritated me, which influenced on the tone of my post. -- Piotrek irc: #Debian.pl GPG fingerprint: 13ED DF91 6DF9 A440 2D78 F657 3579 2D3D DDBD DEFD GPG public key : http://pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl/~piotr/public.asc
Re: pppd changes permission to /dev/ttyS1 (my modem)
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, David Wright wrote: Quoting Piotr Krukowiecki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, David Wright wrote: Quoting Mario Olimpio de Menezes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: pppd removes g+w from /dev/ttyS1 after it is started. So next time I have to be root to use my modem (and to connect to internet). How to make pppd stop removing it ? better: add users that need to use modem to dialout group; # adduser user dialout Wrong. That would allow all those users to snoop on each other's ppp connections, since they get read-access to the modem port. I'm the only user - it's my home computer so I don't care. The correct group is dip. Wrong again ;) At least with wvdial. Fair enough. Next time I'll read your mind. This time, I'll just point out that you didn't mention wvdial in your posting. That's true. I just thought it was only pppd fault (that it changes permission) With pon/poff it's all ok. i don't have to be in group dialout nor have g+w permission on /dev/ttyS1. If /dev/ttyS1 is g+w while starting pppd, pppd removes it and puts back on exit. But if i use wvdial, /dev/ttyS1 has to be group writable: SeLeR:/home/piotr# l /dev/ttyS1 crw-r-1 root dialout4, 65 wrz 5 22:41 /dev/ttyS1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/download/5$ wvdial -- WvDial: Internet dialer version 1.41 -- Cannot open /dev/ttyS1: Permission denied Well that appears to be broken behaviour. Why should your being entitled to run wvdial for PPP mean that you should have write-access to all the serial ports? One more thing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wvdial -- Can't read config file /etc/wvdial.conf: Permission denied [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ l /etc/wvdial.conf -rw-r-1 root dialout 174 sie 20 22:18 /etc/wvdial.conf So you have to be in dialout group to use wvdial. If it has g+w, wvdial is working ok. It connects to my IP and then starts pppd, and pppd removes +w. But I think it's not ending pppd properly. This is from syslog: pppd started by pon and ended by poff: Sep 5 23:00:24 SeLeR pppd[938]: Terminating on signal 15. ^ Sep 5 23:00:24 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 User request] Sep 5 23:00:25 SeLeR pppd[938]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 940), stat$Sep 5 23:00:25 SeLeR pppd[938]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-down started (pid 970) Sep 5 23:00:26 SeLeR pppd[938]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 970), st$Sep 5 23:00:27 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x3 User request] Sep 5 23:00:30 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x4 User request] Sep 5 23:00:33 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x5 User request] Sep 5 23:00:36 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x6 User request] Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Hangup (SIGHUP) Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Modem hangup Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Connection terminated. Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Connect time 0.1 minutes. Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Sent 97 bytes, received 76 bytes. Sep 5 23:00:40 SeLeR pppd[938]: Exit. pppd started by wvdial (and ended by ^c as said in README for wvdial): Sep 5 23:05:41 SeLeR pppd[994]: Terminating on signal 15. And wvdial shows sth. like this: Caught signal #2! Attempting to exit gracefully... -- Disconnecting at Tue Sep 5 23:05:43 2000 So is it bug in wvdial or in pppd ? wvdial has bug (#33590) - there is mentioned my problem but the bug is in resolved (maybe it's because the main problem in #33590 was different) Well, that may depend on how wvdial stops pppd. Killing pppd with SIGTERM seems to restore the port permission, whereas there are/have been bugs in pppd where exiting in some other manner (e.g. PAP failure) has not restored them. If wvdial used -SIGKILL for example, it would be difficult for pppd to do anything about it. This is from todays connection with wvdial: Sep 9 00:26:30 SeLeR pppd[1630]: Terminating on signal 15. ^ Sep 9 00:26:30 SeLeR pppd[1630]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-down started (pid 1651) Sep 9 00:26:30 SeLeR pppd[1630]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 User request] Sep 9 00:26:30 SeLeR pppd[1630]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 1651), status = 0x0 As you see (it was in previous mail too, but without debug option on) pppd is in both cases ended with SIGTERM, but with wvdial pppd ends in different way. I don't know why. A workaround may be a sudo'd script that checks whether pppd is running and restores the permission if it isn't. I'd be very unhappy if pppd didn't g-w the serial port it uses. Oh, and BTW, Debian has to be built for people who *do* care, Why's that? Is Debian meant only for servers ?. Besides, I said I'm the only user. I don't have to pay such attention
Re: pppd changes permission to /dev/ttyS1 (my modem)
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, David Wright wrote: Quoting Mario Olimpio de Menezes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: pppd removes g+w from /dev/ttyS1 after it is started. So next time I have to be root to use my modem (and to connect to internet). How to make pppd stop removing it ? better: add users that need to use modem to dialout group; # adduser user dialout Wrong. That would allow all those users to snoop on each other's ppp connections, since they get read-access to the modem port. I'm the only user - it's my home computer so I don't care. The correct group is dip. Wrong again ;) At least with wvdial. With pon/poff it's all ok. i don't have to be in group dialout nor have g+w permission on /dev/ttyS1. If /dev/ttyS1 is g+w while starting pppd, pppd removes it and puts back on exit. But if i use wvdial, /dev/ttyS1 has to be group writable: SeLeR:/home/piotr# l /dev/ttyS1 crw-r-1 root dialout4, 65 wrz 5 22:41 /dev/ttyS1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/download/5$ wvdial -- WvDial: Internet dialer version 1.41 -- Cannot open /dev/ttyS1: Permission denied If it has g+w, wvdial is working ok. It connects to my IP and then starts pppd, and pppd removes +w. But I think it's not ending pppd properly. This is from syslog: pppd started by pon and ended by poff: Sep 5 23:00:24 SeLeR pppd[938]: Terminating on signal 15. Sep 5 23:00:24 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 User request] Sep 5 23:00:25 SeLeR pppd[938]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 940), stat$Sep 5 23:00:25 SeLeR pppd[938]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-down started (pid 970) Sep 5 23:00:26 SeLeR pppd[938]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 970), st$Sep 5 23:00:27 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x3 User request] Sep 5 23:00:30 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x4 User request] Sep 5 23:00:33 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x5 User request] Sep 5 23:00:36 SeLeR pppd[938]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x6 User request] Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Hangup (SIGHUP) Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Modem hangup Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Connection terminated. Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Connect time 0.1 minutes. Sep 5 23:00:39 SeLeR pppd[938]: Sent 97 bytes, received 76 bytes. Sep 5 23:00:40 SeLeR pppd[938]: Exit. pppd started by wvdial (and ended by ^c as said in README for wvdial): Sep 5 23:05:41 SeLeR pppd[994]: Terminating on signal 15. And wvdial shows sth. like this: Caught signal #2! Attempting to exit gracefully... -- Disconnecting at Tue Sep 5 23:05:43 2000 So is it bug in wvdial or in pppd ? wvdial has bug (#33590) - there is mentioned my problem but the bug is in resolved (maybe it's because the main problem in #33590 was different) PS. Don't CC me. I got everything twice. -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
pppd changes permission to /dev/ttyS1 (my modem)
Hi pppd removes g+w from /dev/ttyS1 after it is started. So next time I have to be root to use my modem (and to connect to internet). How to make pppd stop removing it ? -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
Re: Man -K
On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, John Hasler wrote: Piotr Krukowiecki writes: But they don't. And you can't describe man which has 100 pages or more in one line. Of course you. More importantly, you can put the keywords that people are most likely to search for in that one line. The man foramt really ought to ^^^ But no all words. And maybe I remeber one fancy word from that man, what then ? You include all words from manpage in description? ;) include a 'keywords' line, though. -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
Re: Man -K
On 2 Aug 2000, John Hasler wrote: Andrew Sullivan writes: I thought the original poster was talking about a _full body_ search of the man pages. Do RH and SuSE really do that? Certainly, apropos doesn't -- it searches the description (at least on my system). Which would be fine if people would write proper descriptions. But they don't. And you can't describe man which has 100 pages or more in one line. I checked rpm from TurboLinux (man-1.5g-5.i386.rpm). From it's man page: -K Search for the specified string in *all* man pages. Warning: this is probably very slow! It helps to specify a section. (Just to give a rough idea, on my machine this takes about a minute per 500 man pages.) I want to know why debian don't use that version of man. -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
Re: Man -K
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Fabrizio Polacco wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 01:54:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: I wonder why debian have man without -K option (searching through body of manpage, not only title), unlike RH or Suse RedHat uses a different program. Yes, I know. TurboLinux uses it too (debian uses man provided by man-db) But Suse uses the same man as Debian. Are you sure that Suse has the -L option? (I don't know how to get the hands on a suse machine). No, I'm not. I had Suse and RedHat and I remember that at least one of them had that option. But the question is why debian have chosen that version of man ? -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
Man -K
Hi I wonder why debian have man without -K option (searching through body of manpage, not only title), unlike RH or Suse P.S. sorry for my poor English -- Peter irc: #Debian.pl
