Re: upgrading from corel linux to potato

1999-11-21 Thread Steve Willer

On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Joey Hess wrote:

 aphro wrote:
  i have a feeling corel will have a glibc2.1 update to their linux not long
  after potato is released ..very few will want to try to upgrade from corel
  to potato ..it would be too painful
 
 It wouldn't be, if corel hadn't done stupid things with kde-corel.

It's true, they got a bit sloppy. But it's easily fixable with a
dpkg-divert call.

Unfortunately, I was trying to get Corel's package manager to run on my
potato system (whereas you've been trying for the other way around), and I
hit a dependency problem: kde-corel depends on an older version of the apt
libraries.

I just got into Corel's ftp site, and there is a source repository.
Perhaps I can recompile kde-corel to fix the dependency problem. And
remove the silly file conflict while I'm at it...


Re: Debian and Redhat - are most linux users missing the point?

1999-02-28 Thread Steve Willer

On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, P Asokan wrote:

 It appears to me dselect is more a sysadmin's install tool. Even Yast looks
 a little easier. for my $0.02 i would strongly suggest ywo install programs
 a simpleone with less choices and another for the more adventurous.

It's an interesting thought. The installer gives you a bunch of
preselected options, and then you go into dselect. If the installer made
dselect *optional*  if the user selected a preselected list, this might
make the steep learning curve disappear while still offering lots of
flexibility for people like me who always select Custom on Windows
install programs.



Re: Where are ms-dos filenames for Debian packages?

1999-02-28 Thread Steve Willer

On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Quoting Keith Saxon([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  
  Where can I find Debian packages with 8.3 filenames so I can install them
  from a DOS partion with dselect?
  
 
 I have no idea!  I doubt that you would or could find any!

If he's running a vfat system like Win95 or Win98, he can install on to
hard drive and be sure to load the vfat kernel module during installation.
This will see the long filenames. 



Re: More xfstt help needed.

1999-02-28 Thread Steve Willer

On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, James E. Starr wrote:

 Thanks for all the help given so far, however, after following all
 advise and puting FontPath  unix/:7101 as the last line in my
 XF86Config file, I tried to run the test, as per the FAQ.gz.
 I got as far as xfstt  but I received the error msg cannot open
 TCPIP port 7101, better try
 another port.  Isn't 7101 the port X runs on?  If so, why wou't it
 open?  Do I need to configure something i've missed?

If you've installed xfstt as a package, then it was started when you
booted your machine. You don't need to start it manually. It's complaining
about not being able to open port 7101 because another copy of xfstt
already has it open!

7101 isn't the port X runs on, but the default port for xfstt.


Re: I have PINE .debs...

1999-02-25 Thread Steve Willer

 On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
 
  You can't re-distribute dirivative works.  That's key because an official
  Debian package would require a slightly modified binary in order to comply
  with the Debian filesystem guidelines.  You can modify it for LOCAL USE,
  in which case you need to append L to the version number.  Making
  something available for download on the internet hardly constitues local
  use.

I hope I'm not resurrecting a very old and too-often-discussed issue, but
I was wondering if someone could tell me the specifics. What is it exactly
that requires a compliant Debian-released Pine to be a derivative work?
Are there changes to file locations that can't be handled with a
configure parameter?


Re: xdm question

1999-02-21 Thread Steve Willer

On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Pann McCuaig wrote:

  I did a ctrl-alt-F1 and found xdm in /etc/init.d/. Is it okay to remove
  xdm from here without any adverse effects? Well, I did it anyway :) but
  I was just wondering if I should seek an alternative solution.
 
 man update-rc.d

Better yet, dpkg --purge xdm



Re: pine mutt

1999-02-20 Thread Steve Willer

On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Frederick Page wrote:

 It's the other way around here: I used Pine for email and news, was
 content about the way it handled email, but it sucked for news. And it
 did not have color, which is very helpful (for me).

There is a patch available for Pine that gives it some color. Not as
extensive as Mutt, but it adds a nice touch.

 Now I use mutt and tin and am quite happy with both.

Sounds like mutt wasn't too good for news either.