Re: gpg errors NO_PUBKEY after aptitude update
Yes, that solution is more secure, as I think 02 окт. 2014 г. 1:08 пользователь Floris jkflo...@dds.nl написал: Op Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:18:10 +0200 schreef Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com: 2014-10-01 11:02 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org: severity 647001 important thanks Hi, Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes: 2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org: Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes: I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine. After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these: W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38 Hmm, all the keys APT complains about come from /etc/apt/trusted.gpg? What happens if you move them to a file in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d? After moving trusted.gpg from /etc/apt to /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d all keys were missing. I have manually added keys, but after 'aptitude update' I've got same result - all keys not found. The size of new /etc/apt/trusted.gpg was 0 kb. The size of new /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/trusted.gpg was ~106 kb. Are you using apt from experimental? With apt_1.1~exp3 I could reproduce the issue: /etc/apt/trusted.gpg is not world-readable and apt now uses a _apt user for some tasks. So it cannot access the public keys for verification. Please try making the keyring world-readable (chmod a+r ...). Ansgar Yes, i'm using apt from experimental: LANG=C apt-cache policy apt apt: Installed: 1.1~exp3 Candidate: 1.0.9.1 Version table: *** 1.1~exp3 0 1110 http://mirror.yandex.ru/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1110 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1110 ftp://mirror.mephi.ru/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1110 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status So I made /etc/apt/trusted.gpg world readable and my problem seemed to be solved. I also use the experimental version of apt, and solved the issue with: $ sudo setfacl -m u:_apt:r trusted.gpg I'm not sure, but I think it is a little saver solution. Only the _apt user is allowed to read the file, but correct me if I am wrong. Thanks Ansgar for pointing to a solution, floris
Re: gpg errors NO_PUBKEY after aptitude update
2014-10-01 11:02 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org: severity 647001 important thanks Hi, Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes: 2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org: Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes: I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine. After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these: W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38 Hmm, all the keys APT complains about come from /etc/apt/trusted.gpg? What happens if you move them to a file in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d? After moving trusted.gpg from /etc/apt to /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d all keys were missing. I have manually added keys, but after 'aptitude update' I've got same result - all keys not found. The size of new /etc/apt/trusted.gpg was 0 kb. The size of new /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/trusted.gpg was ~106 kb. Are you using apt from experimental? With apt_1.1~exp3 I could reproduce the issue: /etc/apt/trusted.gpg is not world-readable and apt now uses a _apt user for some tasks. So it cannot access the public keys for verification. Please try making the keyring world-readable (chmod a+r ...). Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87h9zotgpt@deep-thought.43-1.org Yes, i'm using apt from experimental: LANG=C apt-cache policy apt apt: Installed: 1.1~exp3 Candidate: 1.0.9.1 Version table: *** 1.1~exp3 0 1110 http://mirror.yandex.ru/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1110 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1110 ftp://mirror.mephi.ru/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1110 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status So I made /etc/apt/trusted.gpg world readable and my problem seemed to be solved. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: gpg errors NO_PUBKEY after aptitude update
2014-09-27 18:10 GMT+04:00 Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com: NO_PUBKEY 54422A4B98AB5139 removing contents of /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/*.gpg, /etc/apt/trusted.gpg and manual adding missing keys didn't work. Only third-party repositories are affected. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: gpg errors NO_PUBKEY after aptitude update
2014-09-30 14:24 GMT+04:00 Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com: On Tuesday 30 September 2014 11:14:52 Valery Mamonov wrote: Only third-party repositories are affected. You have added the third party keys? Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201409301124.28411.lisi.re...@gmail.com Yes, of course. For example: # gpg --recv-key 54422A4B98AB5139 gpg: requesting key 98AB5139 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net gpg: key 98AB5139: Oracle Corporation (VirtualBox archive signing key) i...@virtualbox.org not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 # gpg -a --export 54422A4B98AB5139 | apt-key add - OK But nothing changed -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: gpg errors NO_PUBKEY after aptitude update
2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org: Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes: I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine. After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these: W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38 [...] However, all these keys are present: LANG=C apt-key list /etc/apt/trusted.gpg [...] pub 4096R/598C5C38 2012-07-15 uid Filip Chabik (Hadret) had...@gmail.com sub 4096R/630AB798 2012-07-15 Hmm, all the keys APT complains about come from /etc/apt/trusted.gpg? What happens if you move them to a file in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d? Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87tx3ofzz7@deep-thought.43-1.org After moving trusted.gpg from /etc/apt to /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d all keys were missing. I have manually added keys, but after 'aptitude update' I've got same result - all keys not found. The size of new /etc/apt/trusted.gpg was 0 kb. The size of new /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/trusted.gpg was ~106 kb. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
gpg errors NO_PUBKEY after aptitude update
Clark sub 2048R/18728851 2011-04-09 pub 4096R/89DF5277 2010-07-11 uid Guillaume Plessis g...@dotdeb.org sub 4096R/3D624A3B 2010-07-11 sub 4096R/A2098A6E 2010-07-11 pub 2048R/5CB26B26 2011-07-12 uid Duinsoft Packages p...@duinsoft.nl sub 2048R/726A2EC2 2011-07-12 pub 4096R/598C5C38 2012-07-15 uid Filip Chabik (Hadret) had...@gmail.com sub 4096R/630AB798 2012-07-15 pub 1024R/10826689 2011-12-15 uid Launchpad PPA for Alexander Mieland pub 2048R/B05498B7 2012-12-07 uid Valve Corporation li...@steampowered.com sub 2048R/C081CFD1 2012-12-07 pub 2048R/E3805CD8 2012-07-07 uid TorrentStream (TorrentStream products) tsvie...@gmail.com sub 2048R/7476C667 2012-07-07 pub 2048R/8C360DDC 2012-06-14 uid Sorokin Alexei sor.ale...@hotbox.ru sub 2048R/3382E805 2012-06-14 pub 2048R/72740199 2012-06-11 uid Christian Svedin (gurka) christian.sve...@gmail.com sub 2048R/6720BD05 2012-06-11 pub 4096R/45C45076 2011-09-19 [expires: 2021-09-16] uid Siduction Repository (The Siduction Repository) reposit...@siduction.org sub 4096R/05BF7E4F 2011-09-19 [expires: 2021-09-16] /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-jessie-stable.gpg --- pub 4096R/518E17E1 2013-08-17 [expires: 2021-08-15] uid Jessie Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-keyring.gpg - pub 4096R/B98321F9 2010-08-07 [expires: 2017-08-05] uid Squeeze Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org pub 4096R/473041FA 2010-08-27 [expires: 2018-03-05] uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-squeeze-automatic.gpg --- pub 4096R/473041FA 2010-08-27 [expires: 2018-03-05] uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-squeeze-stable.gpg pub 4096R/B98321F9 2010-08-07 [expires: 2017-08-05] uid Squeeze Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-wheezy-automatic.gpg -- pub 4096R/46925553 2012-04-27 [expires: 2020-04-25] uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-wheezy-stable.gpg --- pub 4096R/65FFB764 2012-05-08 [expires: 2019-05-07] uid Wheezy Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-ports-archive-2013.gpg pub 4096R/2FF7A9F4 2012-12-30 [expired: 2014-01-31] uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2013) ftpmas...@debian-ports.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-ports-archive-2014.gpg pub 4096R/623DB0B8 2014-01-16 [expires: 2015-01-31] uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2014) ftpmas...@debian-ports.org /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/steam.gpg pub 2048R/B05498B7 2012-12-07 uid Valve Corporation li...@steampowered.com sub 2048R/C081CFD1 2012-12-07 /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/valve-archive-keyring.gpg pub 2048R/D0BBF5AE 2013-10-08 uid Valve builder achive signing key li...@steampowered.com sub 2048R/9E36D781 2013-10-08 pub 2048R/8ABDDD96 2013-11-05 uid Valve SteamOS Release Key stea...@steampowered.com sub 2048R/103C02AE 2013-11-05 What can i do to resolve this situation? -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: MTP and Android phones
You can always submit your device's vendor ID and device ID to libmtp maintainers: According to http://libmtp.sourceforge.net/ : New Device? If you happen upon a device which libmtp claims it cannot autodetect, please: - Submit the vendor ID and device ID as a bug, patch or feature request on the Sourceforge bug trackerhttp://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=158745atid=809061 at our homepage. - If it gives a sensible output from mtp-detect then please attach the result as well as it teaches us some stuff about your device. - If it doesn't give sensible output, attach the output from lsusb -v for your device. 2014/1/8 Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net On 2014-01-07 13:07:42 -0500, Brad Sawatzky wrote: On Tue, 07 Jan 2014, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: Wait, so explain how i can get my phone connected to my computer? There have now been several different and contradicting explanations :-( I have used go-mtpfs with my nexus4, nexus5, and nexus10 under wheezy and it works well. It doesn't work with the Galaxy Note II (though it has worked for some time in the past). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696513 -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140108090249.ga21...@xvii.vinc17.org -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: Sound on Skype (sid)
Using skype on sid (via ALSA), since version 2.x - no chopped sound at all. Also i had changed the motherboard - had no problems with changed sound playback devices. 2013/7/15 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote: The sound on Skype (sid) is impossible!! It is so chopped up that it is impossible to make a call. The sound recorder and audio streams [YouTube, video on Wall Street Journal] work perfectly. Use Google Messenger instead. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: Debian 6 query - how to adjust mouse double click sensitivity
I have faced this problem too, googling was unsuccessful. 2013/5/24 Bret Busby b...@busby.net Hello. I am running Debian 6, with GNOME 2.30.2 (I think; when I select Help- About, with a GNOME application, that is the version number shown). I have recently noticed a problem, with uncontrollable double (or multiple) mouse clicks, when a single click should be occurring, causing multiple problems. In the System - Preferences - Mouse configuration setting utility, is an option for adjusting the timeout for mouse double clicks, but, apparently not a means of adjusting (in this case, lowering) the sensitivity, or, increasing the lag time (?) between clicks, which could (would) force the system to wait a longer (if so set) time for registering a double click; for example, adjusting a setting, so that the system would wait for 1/10 second, or, 1/2 second, before registering a double click, so that, if a user does not get the finger off the mouse button within a thousandth of a second, a double click is not registered. Can this parameter be adjusted, so that a user is required to distinctly press the mouse button twice, after a set time, eg, 1/2 second, before a double click is registered, and, if it can be adjusted, how can it be adjusted? Thank you in anticipation. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .. So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means. - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts, written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 ..**.. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-user-requ...@lists.debian.orgwith a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**alpine.DEB.2.00.1305242148510.** 9153@bret-dd-workstation.**busby.nethttp://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1305242148510.9...@bret-dd-workstation.busby.net -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: please put not all into multiarch!
2012/10/21 Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com On Sb, 20 oct 12, 12:02:02, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: But then, when I wanted to install the nvidia-glx package (32-bit), aptitude messed with several other packages. It wanted to deinstall skype (which is running perfectly in 64-bit environment), crrsim and some other 32-bit packages, due to unmet dependencies. Aptitude wants to deinstall those packages, or forces me, to install a lot of 32-bit libs, which I do not need! Why do you think so? The 64 bit skype is actually a 32 bit skype that needs ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk. In wheezy you need the regular libraries instead. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic I.e. I must install a bunch of i386-packages to meet skype-only dependencies? -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: please put not all into multiarch!
2012/10/21 Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com On Du, 21 oct 12, 13:41:35, Valery Mamonov wrote: I.e. I must install a bunch of i386-packages to meet skype-only dependencies? Yes. Are you worried about the number of packages or size? If the later you should check the size of ia32-libs(-gtk) ;) Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic About number of packages, of course - install almost 32bit-operating system to run only one program. I think, it's a problem of skype itself, too. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: newbie question on port forwarding(and ssh, netcat)
2012/10/11 houkensjtu houkens...@gmail.com Thanks Joe, Brian, Murphy As I post above, I forgot to say all these experiments were done in my home on my laptop... Now I am in my office and re-do all this experiment. To be short, now all experiment which is done with ip address works well, while if I do ssh USER@DEBIAN, it will say: ssh: Could not resolve hostname debian: Name or service not known I am wondering, who(or what device,server) will resolve the hostname? Is it possible to resolve my laptop's name from my office?? 2012年10月11日木曜日 1時00分03秒 UTC+9 houkensjtu: Hi debianer! I am a newbie both of debian and networking... Recently I am trying to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my home) from office. I read several articles on port forwarding. And I succeeded in opening an 22 port on my router, also I started ssh server on my home laptop. (suppose my username at home is USER, and my laptop is called DEBIAN) I did several experiment and I got confusing in some of its result. 1. ssh USER@DEBIAN works well!! 2. nc -vz my_home_external_ip 22 [my_home_external_ip] 22 (ssh) : Connection refused I cant understand why is it. Because I have actually succeeded in test 1! 3. ssh -l USER my_home_external_ip ssh: connect to host my_home_external_ip port 22: Connection refused This also doesnt work! I thought it should be equivalent to test 1, but things just dont work. Any one can explain this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/95c24d80-4052-429d-8658-cf3f447ff...@googlegroups.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84255302-35f8-4009-9f05-af25a076d...@googlegroups.com Hello. You can use such services as no-ip.com or dyndns.org to create a DNS A-record for your home external IP-address. This DNS record will be resolved everywhere. Also you can modify the 'hosts' file on your work computer (/etc/hosts in Linux and c:\windows]system32\drivers\etc\hosts in windows) and put the name of your home computer there. With second approach you'll be able to resolve the name on your work computer only. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: how to vncviewer my home pc from office?
192.168.1.3 is private non-routed range, used for local networks. If you want to fast decision, try to use teamviewer - teamviewer.com. Other ways are rather complicated, for example installing and configuring openVPN at home computer and make port forwarding on modem and router to have possibility to connect home computer. 29.09.2012 9:36 пользователь houkensjtu houkens...@gmail.com написал: I have a debian laptop in my home, which is connected to a router(which is connected to my modem). I did ifconfig on my laptop and it gaves me a bunch of information and I noticed there is a ip addr. which is 192.168.1.3...And I opened a vncserver on my laptop. I tried to connect my laptop from my office by vncviewer 192.168.1.3:1 but things not work...by saying vncviewer: ConnectToTcpAddr: connect: No route to host Unable to connect to VNC server I know my question seems stupid but plz help me! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5ed779a1-dc72-4752-9778-d79a54413...@googlegroups.com
Re: grub2.00-7 from experimental
2012/9/28 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov: Downgrading grub packages to 1.99-23 from unstable did the trick, as I thought. System boots and works fine. Ok, good. Would be interesting to know what the error was. In case you spare any free time, I´d look in the shell script update-grub or grub-mkconfig for the occurence of a part of the error message and look whats going on there. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201209281326.33298.mar...@lichtvoll.de Thanks, I'll look in scripts. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
grub2.00-7 from experimental
Hello all. I'm using mixed unstable/experimental system. $ uname -a Linux vmamonov 3.5.0-4.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Sun Sep 16 23:41:08 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Some days ago I had updated grub2 packages to 2.00-7 version. Now I have such situation: # update-grub GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. # grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. What must I do to resolve problem, except reverting grub2 to 1.99-23 from unstable? -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: grub2.00-7 from experimental
2012/9/27 Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using mixed unstable/experimental system. Some days ago I had updated grub2 packages to 2.00-7 version. Now I have such situation: # update-grub GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. # grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. What must I do to resolve problem, except reverting grub2 to 1.99-23 from unstable? Try dpkg's --configure or apt-get's -f. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SwnL6F=YfD0O_m+tFo=8g8cz1abr8+chn-n12zzsn-...@mail.gmail.com No luck :( # dpkg --configure -a # update-grub GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: grub2.00-7 from experimental
2012/9/27 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov: Hello all. Hi Valery! I'm using mixed unstable/experimental system. $ uname -a Linux vmamonov 3.5.0-4.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Sun Sep 16 23:41:08 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux With a non-standard kernel. Thats no official Debian kernel. Yes, I know. Never experienced any problem with it. Some days ago I had updated grub2 packages to 2.00-7 version. Now I have such situation: # update-grub GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. # grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. What must I do to resolve problem, except reverting grub2 to 1.99-23 from unstable? You install software from experimental. You even install a bootloader (!) package from experimental. But you do not know how to configure a package or do not know that above error message refers to configuring a package? I recommend to learn package management basics before using *any* package from experimental. Heck, I´d even stay away from unstable, before I knew a bit more about package management. (Although unstable is IMHO quite tame at the moment.) What did you expect to gain from installing grub 2.00 anyway? I omit answer to your question as Tom already gave it. If you still have problems please post output of the dpkg / apt-get command you tried. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201209272029.29067.mar...@lichtvoll.de Well, I know about experimental repository and unstability of packages within it. But my Debian system is working over 3 years, and i've decided all problems i've faced with. Usually I use google for this, but couldn't find anything about my issue, that's because i've decided to ask some help in debian-user. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
Re: grub2.00-7 from experimental
2012/9/27 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov: 2012/9/27 Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using mixed unstable/experimental system. Some days ago I had updated grub2 packages to 2.00-7 version. Now I have such situation: # update-grub GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. # grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. What must I do to resolve problem, except reverting grub2 to 1.99-23 from unstable? Try dpkg's --configure or apt-get's -f. […] No luck :( # dpkg --configure -a # update-grub GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. Works here: merkaba:~ apt-get install -t experimental grub-pc Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert: grub-common grub-pc-bin grub2-common […] grub-pc (2.00-7) wird eingerichtet ... installation beendet. Keine Fehler aufgetreten. grub.cfg wird erstellt … Found background image: /usr/share/images/desktop-base/desktop-grub.png Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-3.6.0-rc7-tp520 initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-3.6.0-rc7-tp520 […] Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.bin Found memtest86+ multiboot image: /memtest86+_multiboot.bin erledigt merkaba:~ LANG=C update-grub Generating grub.cfg ... Found background image: /usr/share/images/desktop-base/desktop-grub.png Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.6.0-rc7-tp520 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.6.0-rc7-tp520 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.6.0-rc6-tp520 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.6.0-rc6-tp520 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.6.0-rc5-tp520 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.6.0-rc5-tp520 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.2-tp520 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.5.2-tp520 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.5-trunk-amd64 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.5-trunk-amd64 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-3-amd64 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-3-amd64 Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.bin Found memtest86+ multiboot image: /memtest86+_multiboot.bin done What does apt-cache policy? merkaba:~ LANG=C apt-cache policy grub-pc grub-pc: Installed: 2.00-7 Candidate: 2.00-7 Version table: *** 2.00-7 0 200 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.99-23 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages LANG=C apt-cache policy grub-pc grub-pc: Installed: 2.00-7 Candidate: 2.00-7 Version table: *** 2.00-7 0 1000 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1000 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 1000 http://mirror.yandex.ru/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.99-23 0 990 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 990 http://mirror.yandex.ru/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 800 http://mirror.yandex.ru/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1 0 500 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable/main amd64 Packages What does merkaba:~ dpkg -s grub-pc | grep Status Status: install ok installed say on your system? -- dpkg -s grub-pc | grep Status Status: install ok installed -- Does dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc work? LANG=C dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc Installation finished. No error reported. GRUB = 2.00 has been unpacked but not yet configured. grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete. It should run later as part of configuring the new GRUB packages. Why does your system have a non-standard kernel? Are any other non standard package repositories active? Good question :) Quote from liquorix.net: Liquorix is a distro kernel replacement built using the best configuration and kernel sources for desktop, multimedia, and gaming workloads. Тhis kernel works for а long time and I never had any problems . Yes, I have some non-standard repos, but for specific applications, not for grub-pc. My recommendation from the other post still applies ;). With some luck you should
Re: grub2.00-7 from experimental
Downgrading grub packages to 1.99-23 from unstable did the trick, as I thought. System boots and works fine. -- Best regards, Valery Mamonov.
