Re: deluge to handle torrents
2010/10/3 bri...@aracnet.com: Hi all, I was trying to set up deluge to handle torrents in ice weasel, and ran into the following problem. when I go to the applications tab, there isn't actually a way to add an app against a mime type. so the question is 1 why isn't it automatically registered when deluge is installed, i.e. is this a buglet in the deluge package ? 2 is there some delta between ice weasel and firefox in the way that applications are handled ? maybe through some other debian package ? Thanks, Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101002235406.58459...@windy.deldotd.com Click on a .torrent link, a dialog window open, choose Open With, click Browse and go to /usr/bin/deluge If the windows do not open, the go to the Preference - Aplications Tab and set Always Ask for .torrent links -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik8n=4gyqt-02vvvd-phfq7cb�jie1-zdj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Gnome automount
2010/8/11 James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com: Hi, How do I stop gnome automounting a usb hard drive? I ideally need an option, to ask me if I want to mount the drive. This is very annoying when I need to manually mount the drive as read only, as I'm trying to recover data from it. Done some googling on this, and gnome-volume-manager and gconf are both mentioned, but I dont think I use either of those. I'm using Debian Squeeze. Thanks! Launch gconf-editor, go to /apps/nautilus/preferences, and set accordingly to your taste the flags media_automount and media_automount_open -- enzotib -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=uv8s=kjosq4zsonfteqaqbpnh_j+hcfon-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Successful install of nautilus-dropbox from Ubuntu deb leaves dependency error
2010/7/31 Patrick Wiseman pwise...@gmail.com: Hello, all: I installed the amd54 Ubuntu deb of nautilus-dropbox. In order to do that, I had to override a dependency problem: dpkg --force-depends-version -i nautilus-dropbox_0.6.3_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 230573 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace nautilus-dropbox 0.6.3 (using nautilus-dropbox_0.6.3_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement nautilus-dropbox ... dpkg: nautilus-dropbox: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested: nautilus-dropbox depends on libnautilus-extension1 (= 1:2.22.2); however: Version of libnautilus-extension1 on system is 2.30.1-1. Setting up nautilus-dropbox (0.6.3) ... Evidently the lib-nautilus package in testing is actually OK, being later than the one expected, which is why I felt confident in forcing the install. And the application installed and works flawlessly. But now aptitude complains of a dependency error and recommends removing nautilus-dropbox. I shall, of course, ignore the recommendation, but is there any way to tell aptitude that all is actually well? But dropbox is not in debian repo now? Btw, when it was not, a picked up ubuntu version like you, but modified the .deb this way 1) unpacking it with dpkg-deb -x, dpkg-deb -e 2) modifying 1:2.22.2 to 2.22.2 in the control file 3) repacking it with dpkg-deb -b hope this help -- enzotib -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikc4hce4cy4m0boudhw4npntvv_phvrfypox...@mail.gmail.com
Re: what about acroread in squeeze i386?
They moved to non-free, see http://debian-multimedia.org/. -- enzotib 2010/2/28 Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com: What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf reader. thanks francesco pietra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b87c422a1002281030k46e3214tf012b696a121e...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/756bdd601002281052n56c36fd4pecaf8775719a0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: what about acroread in squeeze i386?
2010/2/28 Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com: Do you see any mistake in my sources.list? deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ squeeze main non-free # deb http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/debian-multimedia/ testing main # deb-src http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/debian-multimedia/ testing main deb http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/MacMolPlt/debian squeeze main deb-src http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/MacMolPlt/debian squeeze main Still unable to find acroread. thanks francesco You're right, it is not present in squeeze multimedia repos, but i think the sid version should work fine. You can find it here: http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/non-free/a/adobereader-enu/acroread_9.3.1-0.0_i386.deb -- enzotib On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Vincenzo Tibullo enzo...@gmail.com wrote: They moved to non-free, see http://debian-multimedia.org/. -- enzotib 2010/2/28 Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com: What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf reader. thanks francesco pietra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b87c422a1002281030k46e3214tf012b696a121e...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/756bdd601002282252p35231deeqada846216b930...@mail.gmail.com
Re: dvi2ps in squeeze
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:09:21AM +, T o n g wrote: Hi, I found dvi2ps in squeeze is not installable: The following packages have unmet dependencies: dvi2ps: Depends: libkpathsea4 (= 2007) but it is not installable Is it only me? Thanks I can confirm this issue in unstable, but I don't need dvi2ps because I use pdflatex. -- enzotib -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Permissions for /dev/fuse changing at boot
2009/11/6 Todd A. Jacobs nos...@codegnome.org: Every time my system reboots, ownership of /dev/fuse is changed from root.fuse to root.root. How can I make the changes permanent, so that users in the fuse group have access to the device across reboots? -- I suggest to wait for the bugs correction to income to unstable or testing (depending on your installation): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473545 -- enzotib -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: How to replicate the behaviour of /usr/local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:55:37 +0200 Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr ha scritto: | Dne, 16. 10. 2009 12:50:43 je Klistvud napisal(a): | Dne, 16. 10. 2009 12:19:03 je Cameron Hutchison napisal(a): | Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr writes: | ... | | # chgrp users /path/to/shared/directory | # chmod g+s /path/to/shared/directory | ... | | Anybody care to chime in? The question was: how does /usr/local | manage to assign a predefined group ownership to every file you copy | to /usr/ local? Can such behaviour be replicated for an arbitrary | directory in my /home subtree? | You have received the correct answer from Cameron, what else you want? If you copy or create a file, it works exactly as /usr/local, the file has the same group as the destination dir. If you move a file, it works exactly as /usr/local, the file retains its group. - -- Vincenzo Tibullo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrdZ1oACgkQVC1WJss4YhefAQCfbA9DjgiIU5xLXdPvr98X65cj rZwAn2NXJHdrysHRoPYKLIy80Z33dtiK =T9zZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
