Re: FYI (Infomagic's debian outdated.)
I have this 6 cd set also. The set, in fact, does have the 2.0.30 kernel present. You need to find the directory with the 2.0.30 rescue disk and driver disk images and use these two along with the 5 base disks to make the initial installation. You can then continue with dselect to install the 2.0.30 source files along with any other utilities or programs. tjm [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: FYI (Infomagic's debian outdated.)
I got the "Official CD" from the ftp site in August. It has an 1.3.1 directory in it. I took great pain to install from that directory. Then I found out that it is symlinked to 1.3. Anyway, I put hamm on one of my machine. And it still shows 1.3 at bootup. Bao -- Bao C. Ha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.hacom.net voice: (706) 736-8717 dial-in: (706) 849-0785 -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: FYI (Infomagic's debian outdated.)
Infomagic did not recieve _any_ master disk from Debian. They made one on their own. Bruce -- Can you get your operating system fixed when you need it? Linux - the supportable operating system. http://www.debian.org/support.html Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW PHONE NUMBER: 510-620-3502 -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
FYI (Infomagic's debian outdated.)
hi all, (This is from a newbie, but i've checked this list's archives of the last two months -- as well as the postings for the last two days -- to ensure that no-one has mentioned this before. If otherwise, i apologize.) i got the August '97 version of the Infomagic 6-CD set. It claims to have Debian 1.3.1 & kernel 2.0.30, but it clearly has the Debian 1.3 & kernel 2.0.29. (This is confirmed by running uname, by the output of the X server, and by the output of the boot sequence, and by ) Infomagic suggests that the master disk which they received from debian was incorrect. This is purely FYI and is *my* observation alone -- so take it with as many grains of salt as you see fit. I am informing people in order to save some folks the hassels which i went thru -- i needed the very _latest_ Mach64 X server! regards, ali -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
