Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 06/21/2011 02:26 PM, he who wrote: [snip] Speaking of multiple music directories, do you know of a way to set which directory Amarok imports music files too? It just uses the first (and main) directory I selected but I may need to change that. What if I've already got an organized scheme for my 56GB of music? Amarok will duplicate it into it's own directory tree? Or, worse, *move* all the files? -- Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e01cb1e.3040...@cox.net
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 22/06/11 20:59, Ron Johnson wrote: On 06/21/2011 02:26 PM, he who wrote: [snip] Speaking of multiple music directories, do you know of a way to set which directory Amarok imports music files too? [1] No - Amarok doesn't move files - that's a functionality you have to add through scripts if desired It just uses the first (and main) directory I selected but I may need to change that. You can change the directory/ies it indexes. See [1] redundancy removed, sorry Ron Cheers -- Q. If a tail is a leg, how many legs does a dog have? A. Four -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e01d545.4030...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote: On 21/06/11 09:52, he who wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: On 06/20/2011 07:35 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: [snip] Unfortunately Aqualung has only a small subset of Amarok 2s capabilities. And I've yet to find anything that matches Amarok - it easily handles my 260GB music collection (53k+ songs (5130 albums) as well as lyric files, photos, music videos, and album art - auto display of Wikipedia entries for playing tracks - plugins for musicbrainz, dozens of extension scripts, and it's easy to write more. It uses mysql (or other) database and has extensive playlist capability. As an added bonus it crashes every time I shut it down :-( But nothing breaks, and nothing beats it. The music files are stored directly in a database? Just playlists and program specific information I believe. The music directories, files, their tags and any changes therein made by Amarok remain accessible by other programs. -- Regards, Freeman Yes. The point, which I failed to make, is that I can modify the database to suit my own requirements, without being restricted to the music player/collection manager interface. Amarok doesn't alter the actual files and happily works with files in multiple locations. All the other music players that I've tried don't work well with large collections and/or don't allow me to use musicbrainz. Amarok can directly use musicbrainz but doesn't stop me from using Picard as well. The crash on closing I experience (Squeeze) may well be one of my dodgy scripts - but as it doesn't reduce the functionality of Amarok I can happily live with it. Cheers I just get random crashes, in squeeze with Amarok installed from backports. Crashes generally confine themselves to when I am crazy busy, switching lots in and out of the main playlist while editing genres and changing settings. (Not so much any more.) But I find that doing much rearranging with podcasts while playing same seems to precipitate crashiness. I don't have any of my own scripts. The one I have isolated as problematic is the moodbar generator. If I let it finish on a playlist, then turn it off in script manager, there are no problems and the generated moodbars remain. I've only had one crash where I lost data. And that was settings. When I re-edited the settings, everything was back. There is an issue with ID tags reassigning themselves. But they are slowly stabilizing with repeated re-edits. I think that is because files get added with a variety of tags that Amarok doesn't handle, so sometimes get saved from edits while still containing data that trips up Amarok. If necessary, I'll start going after them with a tag editor, kid3(?). I think the main playlist should be called the queue-list. Calling it the playlist confuses it with saved playlists. Speaking of multiple music directories, do you know of a way to set which directory Amarok imports music files too? It just uses the first (and main) directory I selected but I may need to change that. P.S. Hope this is in plain text.script -- Regards, Freeman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikwktkuzq7b80jxqjgrutpjtmu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Sunday 19 June 2011 23:42:42 Ron Johnson wrote: On 06/19/2011 01:22 PM, Lisi wrote: On Sunday 19 June 2011 19:01:07 AG wrote: Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. Is this Anarok 2.x. I have heard complaints about it before. I am still sitting pretty on Amarok 1.4.5, which is more than adequate for my (admittedly undemanding) needs. Try aqualung. Why? I like Amarok. It's gooey and plays music. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201106200804.29926.lisi.re...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 20/06/11 17:04, Lisi wrote: On Sunday 19 June 2011 23:42:42 Ron Johnson wrote: On 06/19/2011 01:22 PM, Lisi wrote: On Sunday 19 June 2011 19:01:07 AG wrote: Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. Is this Anarok 2.x. I have heard complaints about it before. I am still sitting pretty on Amarok 1.4.5, which is more than adequate for my (admittedly undemanding) needs. Try aqualung. Why? I like Amarok. It's gooey and plays music. Lisi Unfortunately Aqualung has only a small subset of Amarok 2s capabilities. And I've yet to find anything that matches Amarok - it easily handles my 260GB music collection (53k+ songs (5130 albums) as well as lyric files, photos, music videos, and album art - auto display of Wikipedia entries for playing tracks - plugins for musicbrainz, dozens of extension scripts, and it's easy to write more. It uses mysql (or other) database and has extensive playlist capability. As an added bonus it crashes every time I shut it down :-( But nothing breaks, and nothing beats it. Apart from crashing the new - built-in contact the developer feature repeatedly lets you know they received your message - sort of like an echo! :-D Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dff3ea1.9080...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 06/20/2011 07:35 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: [snip] Unfortunately Aqualung has only a small subset of Amarok 2s capabilities. And I've yet to find anything that matches Amarok - it easily handles my 260GB music collection (53k+ songs (5130 albums) as well as lyric files, photos, music videos, and album art - auto display of Wikipedia entries for playing tracks - plugins for musicbrainz, dozens of extension scripts, and it's easy to write more. It uses mysql (or other) database and has extensive playlist capability. As an added bonus it crashes every time I shut it down :-( But nothing breaks, and nothing beats it. The music files are stored directly in a database? -- Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dffb5b6.2060...@cox.net
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: On 06/20/2011 07:35 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: [snip] Unfortunately Aqualung has only a small subset of Amarok 2s capabilities. And I've yet to find anything that matches Amarok - it easily handles my 260GB music collection (53k+ songs (5130 albums) as well as lyric files, photos, music videos, and album art - auto display of Wikipedia entries for playing tracks - plugins for musicbrainz, dozens of extension scripts, and it's easy to write more. It uses mysql (or other) database and has extensive playlist capability. As an added bonus it crashes every time I shut it down :-( But nothing breaks, and nothing beats it. The music files are stored directly in a database? Just playlists and program specific information I believe. The music directories, files, their tags and any changes therein made by Amarok remain accessible by other programs. -- Regards, Freeman
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 21/06/11 09:52, he who wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: On 06/20/2011 07:35 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: [snip] Unfortunately Aqualung has only a small subset of Amarok 2s capabilities. And I've yet to find anything that matches Amarok - it easily handles my 260GB music collection (53k+ songs (5130 albums) as well as lyric files, photos, music videos, and album art - auto display of Wikipedia entries for playing tracks - plugins for musicbrainz, dozens of extension scripts, and it's easy to write more. It uses mysql (or other) database and has extensive playlist capability. As an added bonus it crashes every time I shut it down :-( But nothing breaks, and nothing beats it. The music files are stored directly in a database? Just playlists and program specific information I believe. The music directories, files, their tags and any changes therein made by Amarok remain accessible by other programs. -- Regards, Freeman Yes. The point, which I failed to make, is that I can modify the database to suit my own requirements, without being restricted to the music player/collection manager interface. Amarok doesn't alter the actual files and happily works with files in multiple locations. All the other music players that I've tried don't work well with large collections and/or don't allow me to use musicbrainz. Amarok can directly use musicbrainz but doesn't stop me from using Picard as well. The crash on closing I experience (Squeeze) may well be one of my dodgy scripts - but as it doesn't reduce the functionality of Amarok I can happily live with it. Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e001cf6.5000...@gmail.com
Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
Hey list Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: $ amarok(24118)/libplasma Plasma::FrameSvg::resizeFrame: Invalid size QSizeF(0, 0) amarok(24118)/libplasma Plasma::FrameSvg::resizeFrame: Invalid size QSizeF(0, 0) amarok(24118)/libplasma Plasma::FrameSvg::resizeFrame: Invalid size QSizeF(0, 0) QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (0,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (139,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (139,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (139,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (139,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (323,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Context dock/ContextDock) Negative sizes (0,-1) are not possible QWidget::setMinimumSize: (Playlist dock/Playlist::Dock) Negative sizes (323,-1) are not possible QSocketNotifier: Invalid socket 43 and type 'Read', disabling... KCrash: Application 'amarok' crashing... KCrash: Attempting to start /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/drkonqi from kdeinit sock_file=/home/AG/.kde/socket-valhalla/kdeinit4__0 What on earth is going on here? Applications don't install correctly, or they crash when opened? Although I am able to use my system productively, it is so %$ing infuriating when almost everyday a new problem occurs on this new installation of Debian. I am a long time user and advocate of Debian, but this has got to be the buggiest installation of Debian since when I first started using it, back when Lenny was the testing candidate. What have I done wrong on this, why would an ordinary safe-update of Amarok crash? Yet another issue, and I really don't know what the heck to do about this ... any ideas? Thanks AG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfe1298.7060...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com writes: Hey list Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: [...] this ... any ideas? How about purging amarok, removing all configuration files that may be left in your home directory and install it with aptitude? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqm9n596@yun.yagibdah.de
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:15:36 +0100, AG wrote: Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: $ (...) QSocketNotifier: Invalid socket 43 and type 'Read', disabling... KCrash: Application 'amarok' crashing... KCrash: Attempting to start /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/drkonqi from kdeinit sock_file=/home/AG/.kde/socket-valhalla/kdeinit4__0 What on earth is going on here? Applications don't install correctly, or they crash when opened? Although I am able to use my system productively, it is so %$ing infuriating when almost everyday a new problem occurs on this new installation of Debian. But you are running testing, right? :-) I am a long time user and advocate of Debian, but this has got to be the buggiest installation of Debian since when I first started using it, back when Lenny was the testing candidate. What I don't see is why you think this is a Debian specific issue. Amarok crashes are not so uncommon. What have I done wrong on this, why would an ordinary safe-update of Amarok crash? Yet another issue, and I really don't know what the heck to do about this ... any ideas? Yep, you can try by starting amarok from a complete new profile. As you are under GNOME, maybe you need to rename some folders... Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.06.19.16.43...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
AG: What on earth is going on here? Applications don't install correctly, or they crash when opened? Welcome to testing! :) What have I done wrong on this, why would an ordinary safe-update of Amarok crash? Your question appears to imply that the word safe in safe-ugrade gives any guarantee about the quality of the upgrades. This is not the case. Yet another issue, and I really don't know what the heck to do about this ... Report it to the BTS. J. -- I want to keep my skin looking good but I believe all computers do the same job. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 19/06/11 17:41, lee wrote: AGcomputing.acco...@googlemail.com writes: Hey list Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: [...] this ... any ideas? How about purging amarok, removing all configuration files that may be left in your home directory and install it with aptitude? Hi Lee Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. AG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfe3963.9080...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Sunday 19 June 2011 19:01:07 AG wrote: Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. Is this Anarok 2.x. I have heard complaints about it before. I am still sitting pretty on Amarok 1.4.5, which is more than adequate for my (admittedly undemanding) needs. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201106191922.14493.lisi.re...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:01:07PM +0100, AG wrote: On 19/06/11 17:41, lee wrote: AGcomputing.acco...@googlemail.com writes: Hey list Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: [...] this ... any ideas? How about purging amarok, removing all configuration files that may be left in your home directory and install it with aptitude? Hi Lee Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. 1.) testing = TESTING If the only problem in testing right now is applications, that is a good thing. During the squeeze testing cycle I was without adequate video for 6 months and would have been for most of the cycle had I not held on to old drivers for a year. And I had sound issues the lasted half of the cycle too. 2.) Amarok 2 is under heavy development right now. The version number may look high enough but the code is a complete rewrite. 3.) Amarok is from KDE, Banshee is the official Gnome music suite. For Amarok, make sure all the KDE dependencies are installed. 4.) There are a lot of lib dependency upgrades between 2.3.1 and 2.4.1, looks like most in fact. 5.) There is an amarok mailing list, ama...@kde.org, where the developers themselves will respond to your queries directly, given time. 6.) I solved my problems trying to keep the latest version of Amarok by installing from squeeze-backports. This might still work for wheezy and there is a chance it will resolve the issue if it is dependency related. -- Regards, Freeman Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the answer. --Somebody -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110619190546.GA3879@Deneb.office
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:05:46PM -0700, evenso wrote: 5.) There is an amarok mailing list, ama...@kde.org, where the developers themselves will respond to your queries directly, given time. Oh, Looks like you were there 8 minutes ago. -- Regards, Freeman Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the answer. --Somebody -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110619191641.GB3879@Deneb.office
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 19/06/11 20:05, Freeman wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:01:07PM +0100, AG wrote: On 19/06/11 17:41, lee wrote: AGcomputing.acco...@googlemail.com writes: Hey list Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: [...] this ... any ideas? How about purging amarok, removing all configuration files that may be left in your home directory and install it with aptitude? Hi Lee Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. 1.) testing = TESTING If the only problem in testing right now is applications, that is a good thing. During the squeeze testing cycle I was without adequate video for 6 months and would have been for most of the cycle had I not held on to old drivers for a year. And I had sound issues the lasted half of the cycle too. you accepted that as okay? Testing is one thing, but unless our Sid/ experimental colleagues are really putting up with some dire situations regarding upstream applications, then why would testing be subjected to passed along configurations that aren't fit for purpose? 2.) Amarok 2 is under heavy development right now. The version number may look high enough but the code is a complete rewrite. In which case, it shouldn't be passed along until such time as the relevant dependencies are fixed. 3.) Amarok is from KDE, Banshee is the official Gnome music suite. For Amarok, make sure all the KDE dependencies are installed. It used to work until the latest round of safe upgrades. 4.) There are a lot of lib dependency upgrades between 2.3.1 and 2.4.1, looks like most in fact. In which case I would have expected a mature package manager like apt-get or aptitude to compensate for, which is part of what they are intended to do. 5.) There is an amarok mailing list, ama...@kde.org, where the developers themselves will respond to your queries directly, given time. Have already written to them ... and response time is slow, and who is to say if this is an Amarok or a Debian issue? Hence the double posting, which I know is not good protocol. 6.) I solved my problems trying to keep the latest version of Amarok by installing from squeeze-backports. This might still work for wheezy and there is a chance it will resolve the issue if it is dependency related. How would I do that? I have tried to install from /var/cache/apt/archives/ but that doesn't give me an alternate version Cheers AG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfe5ee2.5040...@gmail.com
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 09:41:06PM +0100, AG wrote: On 19/06/11 20:05, Freeman wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:01:07PM +0100, AG wrote: On 19/06/11 17:41, lee wrote: AGcomputing.acco...@googlemail.com writes: Hey list Today a new issue reared its ugly head. I installed, using safe-update from the Update Manager in GNOME, on a wheezy installation, Amarok . When I go to run Amarok, it crashes. This is the output: [...] this ... any ideas? How about purging amarok, removing all configuration files that may be left in your home directory and install it with aptitude? Hi Lee Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. 1.) testing = TESTING If the only problem in testing right now is applications, that is a good thing. During the squeeze testing cycle I was without adequate video for 6 months and would have been for most of the cycle had I not held on to old drivers for a year. And I had sound issues the lasted half of the cycle too. you accepted that as okay? Did for years. When I wanted something more stable--and would have been willing to complain about it--I went to, of all things, stable, where I've had no complaints. Debian is *free* monetarily, along with other open source software. But there is a price: your time, effort and positive contribution. (Not to mention the time, effort and positive contribution of open source developers who sincerely want nothing but to succeed in *giving* you advanced software.) That price is magnified exponentially by moving outside of Debian stable. Testing is one thing, but unless our Sid/ experimental colleagues are really putting up with some dire situations regarding upstream applications, then why would testing be subjected to passed along configurations that aren't fit for purpose? The Debian assurances are associated with the stable release. Stable is the only official release. One purpose of testing is to get bug reports from the general usage at large, which can't be duplicated anywhere else. I am sure that developers strive for certain standards in the testing release. But better to fail them in testing than in stable. I have heard rumors that development schedules sometimes force packages into testing when they will be broken or constitute problem because there simply is no other solution. That happened to fglrx and my video card. There simply wasn't a replacement and Debian development had to move forward, eventually breaking my old version of fglrx, in order to, among other things, develop the replacement. It is easy and maybe fun to sit in judgement. It is much harder to make a complicated system in a complicated world perfect, not to mention *free*. And Debian does something like that. 2.) Amarok 2 is under heavy development right now. The version number may look high enough but the code is a complete rewrite. In which case, it shouldn't be passed along until such time as the relevant dependencies are fixed. You are welcome to the stable version and I am pretty sure that the 1.4-something version previously mentioned as rock solid will run on stable, maybe testing. You are also welcome to educate yourself on the general status and issues of all the *free* open-source software there is to choose from. There is *free* documentation (not anticipating a profitable sale) to make choosing as easy as possible. But the work involved will never be completely taken out of the equation, even by all those hard working volunteers and developers donating their time and resources, unless you pay somebody. 3.) Amarok is from KDE, Banshee is the official Gnome music suite. For Amarok, make sure all the KDE dependencies are installed. It used to work until the latest round of safe upgrades. I've always understood safe in this case to mean that you will be left with a bootable computer, not that there is a guarantee against application breakage. Might be worth reading the docs if it is an issue for you. I haven't since it isn't for me. 4.) There are a lot of lib dependency upgrades between 2.3.1 and 2.4.1, looks like most in fact. In which case I would have expected a mature package manager like apt-get or aptitude to compensate for, which is part of what they are intended to do. Even in stable, I use apt-move to archive the old version of everything I upgrade. I mean really, find the perfect combination of OS, apps, hardware and user. If you do you should archive everything immediately and then bet the lottery. If you don't you should still archive against backslide. Ergo, snapshot.debian.org, if you don't want to do it yourself. 5.) There is an amarok mailing list, ama...@kde.org, where the developers themselves will respond to your queries directly, given time. Have already written to them ... and response time is slow, and who is to say if this is an Amarok or a Debian issue? Hence the double posting, which I know is not good protocol. Amarok is having a
Re: Almost everyday a new issue: this time Amarok
On 06/19/2011 01:22 PM, Lisi wrote: On Sunday 19 June 2011 19:01:07 AG wrote: Did that and the Amrok app still crashes. Is this Anarok 2.x. I have heard complaints about it before. I am still sitting pretty on Amarok 1.4.5, which is more than adequate for my (admittedly undemanding) needs. Try aqualung. It's gooey and plays music. -- Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfe7b62.2060...@cox.net
