Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:16:15 -0400, Antonio Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Manoj, btw, as an insider, how broken is sid as of now?

I run Sid, and the breakage due to C++ transition seems to be
 mostly behind me -- but I never was much out of sync. Upgrades from
 Sarge may still be interesting.

manoj
-- 
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
Albert Einstein
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.golden-gryphon.com/
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:29:20 -0600, Rick Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 4% $Get_Root make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image

 Manoj - I've switched from --revision= to --append-to-version
 because new kernels of the same version don't clash module
 directories.  It seems much better to me. Do you still prefer
 --revision for some reason?

I use append-to-version when compiling a new image of the same
 version, though recently the speed at which kernels are released
 (2.6.11.5, fer gawds sake) exceeds the rate at which I rebuild my
 kernels, so I rarely have to.

manoj
-- 
Life is a grand adventure -- or it is nothing. Helen Keller
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.golden-gryphon.com/
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-18 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:15:15PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

 If this is ridiculously complex, umm. are you sure you want to
  be running Sid?
 
 manoj


Manoj, btw, as an insider, how broken is sid as of now? 

I'm waiting for some unstable stability before I go back to it (Im
sorry, if all did this, the mantainers would loose many bug reporters,
but for what I am doing, that was too much unstability)

Thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-18 Thread Rick Macdonald

Manoj Srivastava wrote:

 4% $Get_Root make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image 


Manoj - I've switched from --revision= to --append-to-version 
because new kernels of the same version don't clash module directories. 
It seems much better to me. Do you still prefer --revision for some 
reason?


...RickM...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-17 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:05:47 -0400, David R Litwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:  

 I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
 Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing
 that.  It seems ridiculously elaborate.

Phase ONE: Getting and configuring the kernel
 1% cd kernel source tree (make sure you have write permission there)
 2% make config # or make menuconfig or make xconfig (or, for 2.6.x
kernels, make gconfig) and configure

Phase TWO: Create a portable kernel image .deb file
 3% make-kpkg clean
 4% $Get_Root make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image 
  (Get_Root is whatever you need to become root -- fakeroot or
  sudo are examples that come to mind).  NOTE: if you have
  instructed your boot loader to expect initrd kernels (which is
  the norm for recent official kernel image packages) you need to
  add --initrd to the line above.
   % $Get_Root make-kpkg --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image 
  Personally, I prefer non initrd images for my personal machines,
  since then adding third party modules to the machine has fewer
  gotchas
Phase THREE: Install the kernel image on one or more machines
 5# dpkg -i ../kernel-image-X.XXX_1.0_arch.deb

 With the addition of fakeroot ( a really nice program, I recommend
 it). Steps 1 to 4 can be carried out as a non root user. Step 5 does
 require root privileges.


If this is ridiculously complex, umm. are you sure you want to
 be running Sid?

manoj
-- 
A guy has to get fresh once in a while so a girl doesn't lose her
confidence.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.golden-gryphon.com/
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-17 Thread David R. Litwin
If this is ridiculously complex, umm. are you sure you want to be running Sid?
A good question: Allow me to answer: (In no particular order)I want all the latest, most up-to-date soft-ware.If ever I can help report bugs (which I have been known to do) then that is a nice thing to do.
One of the reasons I switched to Linux was so that I could really learn how a computer works. So, having Sid (which is inherently un-stable) may mean I need to get in to the Nitty-gritty of my computer. Which can often be a good thing: I love to learn.
But, as it turns out, I do not need to create a Kernel-Image: An Official Debian one already exists. It simply had a bit of a Name Change, you see, which I did not know about.But, thank you for your information: It's always useful to have different options, yes?
May you find Water and Shade this day.


Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-17 Thread Damon Chesser
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 21:15, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:05:47 -0400, David R Litwin

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
  I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
  Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing
  that.  It seems ridiculously elaborate.

 Phase ONE: Getting and configuring the kernel
  1% cd kernel source tree (make sure you have write permission there)
  2% make config # or make menuconfig or make xconfig (or, for 2.6.x
 kernels, make gconfig) and configure

 Phase TWO: Create a portable kernel image .deb file
  3% make-kpkg clean
  4% $Get_Root make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
   (Get_Root is whatever you need to become root -- fakeroot or
   sudo are examples that come to mind).  NOTE: if you have
   instructed your boot loader to expect initrd kernels (which is
   the norm for recent official kernel image packages) you need to
   add --initrd to the line above.
% $Get_Root make-kpkg --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
   Personally, I prefer non initrd images for my personal machines,
   since then adding third party modules to the machine has fewer
   gotchas
 Phase THREE: Install the kernel image on one or more machines
  5# dpkg -i ../kernel-image-X.XXX_1.0_arch.deb

  With the addition of fakeroot ( a really nice program, I recommend
  it). Steps 1 to 4 can be carried out as a non root user. Step 5 does
  require root privileges.


 If this is ridiculously complex, umm. are you sure you want to
  be running Sid?
Indeed, let's compare it to the standard linux way:

!. Get kernel source, make configure, make menuconfig
2. make all
3. make_modules
4. make_modules install
5. mv /boot/vmlunuz /boot/vmlunuz, 
cp /usr/src/linux/arch(i386)/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlunuz
6.mv /boot/System.map /boot/System.map 
cp //usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map
7. edit /boot/grup/menu.lst or /boot/lilo.conf? to reflect the new kernel.

as you can see, kernel-package is MUCH more complex requiring less steps and 
far less editing.  Please read /usr/share/kernel-package/README (it is 
compressed untill you extract it)  That is the single best kernel howto I 
have ever read.


 manoj
 --
 A guy has to get fresh once in a while so a girl doesn't lose her
 confidence.
 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.golden-gryphon.com/
 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel (SOLVED)

2005-08-17 Thread David R. Litwin
It seems that there is no lack of Documentation and Good Support for those wishing to fiddle with their Kernels: Specifically, create a Kernel-Image.However, I no longer have this problem: I discovered that Debian has simply changed the name of the Kernel-Images to Linux-Images.
Mystery Solved and thanks for all of the Information!


Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-16 Thread Bob Proulx
David R. Litwin wrote:
 I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
 Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing that.
 It seems ridiculously elaborate.

I see in another posting that you solved your problem.  But to address
the above see this documentation.  Because really it is not that hard
and the kenrel-package makes this all quite easy.

  http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-16 Thread David R. Litwin
 I see in another posting that you solved your problem.  But to address
 the above see this documentation.  Because really it is not that hard
 and the kenrel-package makes this all quite easy.
 
   http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html

Yes, it has been mostly solved (though some thing else has cropped
up.). Concerning the documentation link you gave me, that is precisly
what I had read and commented on: It makes it seem like it is
increadilbly complex, despite its saying to the contrary.

But, I muight as well ask:

The following packages have been kept back:
   arts (1.4.1-1 = 1.4.2-2)
   libtunepimp-bin (0.3.0-3 = 0.3.0-7)

When I apt-get install arts, it want libarts1c2 which wants libqt3-mt
which deletes 244 packages (KDE). Now, I know that the Debian
developers are changing KDE to be c++ oriented (or some thing like
that) and are changing the packages of Qt to ...c2. I installed KDE
3.4.1 from Alioth which doesn't have the c2. So, how do I rectify this
situation?

(There was some thing else, but I can not recall.)

Thank you Kindly in advance.



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-16 Thread Adam Mercer
On 16/08/05, David R. Litwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When I apt-get install arts, it want libarts1c2 which wants libqt3-mt
 which deletes 244 packages (KDE). Now, I know that the Debian
 developers are changing KDE to be c++ oriented (or some thing like
 that) and are changing the packages of Qt to ...c2. I installed KDE
 3.4.1 from Alioth which doesn't have the c2. So, how do I rectify this
 situation?

As you expect KDE is going through the C++ ABI transition, see the
following email from the KDE maintainers

http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/08/msg01044.html

They essentially say that if you want a working KDE system, to hold
any KDE updates until they send an email round saying the transition
is done.

Cheers

Adam



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-16 Thread Jon Dowland
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:05:47AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
 I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
 Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing that.
 It seems ridiculously elaborate.

Well if you aren't fussed about fine-tuning the configuration, it's a
six-liner:

obtain and unpack kernel sources
/usr/src$ wget ...
/usr/src$ tar -xzf ...
/usr/src$ cd ...

copy in existing config
/usr/src/...$ cp /boot/config-`uname -r` .config

build
/usr/src/...$ fakeroot make-kpkg --append_to_version initials kernel-image

install
/usr/src# dpkg -i kernel-image*initials*deb

-- 
Jon Dowland   http://jon.dowland.name/
FD35 0B0A C6DD 5D91 DB7A  83D1 168B 4E71 7032 F238


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-15 Thread David R. Litwin
My problem is (possibly) three-fold:

I dist-upgraded to Sid a few hours ago and haven't fully installed it
because udev can not be installed with the 2.6.11 kernel. So, I need
the 2.6.12 kernel, but it isn't a kernel-image. So, I must make one
myself, which I am quite willing to do.

However, apt-get refuses to do any thing until the udev situation is
resolved. And, trying to
make my own kernel image require many (many) packages which requires
apt-get (to do it via dpkg -i would take a blasted long time indeed).
So, I should like to know what I should to do. If I force udev to
install with the 2.6.11 kernel, create a 2.6.12 kernel-image, install
this, will udev automatically fix itself to work with the 2.6.12
kernel?

If not, what should I do?

I thank you kindly in advance.



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-15 Thread [KS]
David R. Litwin wrote:
 My problem is (possibly) three-fold:
 
 I dist-upgraded to Sid a few hours ago and haven't fully installed it
 because udev can not be installed with the 2.6.11 kernel. So, I need
 the 2.6.12 kernel, but it isn't a kernel-image. So, I must make one
 myself, which I am quite willing to do.
 
 However, apt-get refuses to do any thing until the udev situation is
 resolved. And, trying to
 make my own kernel image require many (many) packages which requires
 apt-get (to do it via dpkg -i would take a blasted long time indeed).
 So, I should like to know what I should to do. If I force udev to
 install with the 2.6.11 kernel, create a 2.6.12 kernel-image, install
 this, will udev automatically fix itself to work with the 2.6.12
 kernel?
 
 If not, what should I do?
 
 I thank you kindly in advance.
 

kernel-image was renamed to linux-kernel to accommodate for hurd and
other kernels in near future.

 apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
apt-cache show linux-headers-2.6.12-1
apt-cache show linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-15 Thread David R. Litwin
I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing that.
It seems ridiculously elaborate.

So, let's try this again.

I still have the problem I wrote of (namely udev needing a 2.6.12
kernel and I have only a 2.6.11 kernel so apt-get doesn't work
presently) but I really don't feel like making a Kernel-Image. So, A:
are there any other alternatives? or B: When will there be a nice
kernel-image-2.6.12-i686.deb package that I can use either apt-get or
dpkg -i (the latter if the apt-get situation isn't resolved) to
install?

I thank you kindly in advance.



Re: Apt-Get udev and the Newest Kernel

2005-08-15 Thread David R. Litwin
 kernel-image was renamed to linux-kernel to accommodate for hurd and
 other kernels in near future.

So it was! That would explain why when I searched in the Packages I
found linux-kernel and not kernel-image.

I thank you kindly!

I will try to dpkg -i and hopefully all shall go well.