Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-02 Thread Bob Nielsen
I recall that when WP 8 came out, Corel said the full version came with
a text-based version, but when I took a look at what is on the Corel
Linux CD-ROM (deluxe version with the full version of WP 8) I couldn't
find any text-base executable.  Of course, I didn't know what to look
for, but I couldn't find any mention in the manual either.

When I tried to install it on my potato system, it wanted to replace
perl-5.005 with perl-5.004 and remove a lot of programs.  I have WP 7
install on this system (in /usr/local) and don't have any perl problems
with that.  This could be easily fixed if one had access to the source,
of course, but

I guess I'll stick with the older version, which works fine (and is
more stable than the Windows version).

Bob

On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:42:39PM -0400, Alec Smith wrote:
 I would doubt there's a text-based version of WordPerfect 8 on any
 platform... If there is, I'd love to know how to make it work. Until then,
 I'll stick to WP 5.1/DOS for my work. In a decade of use its never
 crashed or otherwise let me down. :)

-- 
Bob Nielsen, N7XY  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bainbridge Island, WA  http://www.oz.net/~nielsen
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-02 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 01:03:33AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
 I recall that when WP 8 came out, Corel said the full version came with
 a text-based version, but when I took a look at what is on the Corel
 Linux CD-ROM (deluxe version with the full version of WP 8) I couldn't
 find any text-base executable.  Of course, I didn't know what to look
 for, but I couldn't find any mention in the manual either.
 
 When I tried to install it on my potato system, it wanted to replace
 perl-5.005 with perl-5.004 and remove a lot of programs.  I have WP 7
 install on this system (in /usr/local) and don't have any perl problems
 with that.  This could be easily fixed if one had access to the source,
 of course, but

Actually, the source isn't required to make it compatible.  The problem
is that type1inst (upon which wp 8 depends) depends on perl and
perl-5.005 conflicts with perl.  I pulled the control file out of the
type1inst package with ar and changed the dependency from perl to
perl5-base and all installed without any problems.

I guess I could have use the Debian type1inst package instead, but I
didn't realize it existed at the time.

There doesn't appear to be a text-based executable anywhere in the
wp-full package, however.

-- 
Bob Nielsen, N7XY  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bainbridge Island, WA  http://www.oz.net/~nielsen
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread Joseph C. Tuttle


 On 27, aug, 2000 at 10:00:48 +0518, USM Bish wrote:
 

 
 I've just this last weekend heard about WordPerfect for UNIX in version
 5.something being on the CD you could buy of WordPerfect 8!
 
 It's _not_ included in the gratis download version, only the CD-edition.
 
 I don't know if it is true, but the guy who told us sounded like he had
 used it ...
 

I've heard this before, but I haven't been able to find WP 5.x on either of the 
two WP 8 CDs I have.  I'd be happy to find it, though,  because I believe the 
DOS version of WP 5.1 was one of the best software products ever created.  
So, if any of y'all know where it can be found exactly, please let me know. 

Joseph Tuttle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread Paul Seelig
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:38:19AM -0400, Joseph C. Tuttle wrote:
 
 I've heard this before, but I haven't been able to find WP 5.x on either of 
 the 
 two WP 8 CDs I have.  I'd be happy to find it, though,  because I believe the 
 DOS version of WP 5.1 was one of the best software products ever created.  
 So, if any of y'all know where it can be found exactly, please let me know. 
 
It is only included in the retail server edition.  Check for yourself
at http://linux.corel.com/products/wp8/features.htm;.



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread Ted Harding
On 01-Sep-00 Joseph C. Tuttle wrote:
 On 27, aug, 2000 at 10:00:48 +0518, USM Bish wrote:
 I've just this last weekend heard about WordPerfect for UNIX in
 version 5.something being on the CD you could buy of WordPerfect 8!
 
 I've heard this before, but I haven't been able to find WP 5.x on
 either of the two WP 8 CDs I have.  I'd be happy to find it, though, 
 because I believe the DOS version of WP 5.1 was one of the best
 software products ever created.  
 So, if any of y'all know where it can be found exactly, please let me
 know.

Seconded! When WP was windowised to WP6 it lost a lot which has never
come back. In particular, proper printer handling of international
characters is one: WP6/7/8 has only one font for all these, different
from the fonts for ASCII/iso-Latin1, and it looks awful (if it works at
all).

A candy GUI is no substitute for doing a proper job (though I have to
admit that the WordPerfect GUI is better than the Word Imperfect one).

If I could get WP5 for UNIX up on Linux I'd run for it!

Ted.


E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 284 7749
Date: 01-Sep-00   Time: 17:06:02
-- XFMail --



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread Ted Harding
On 01-Sep-00 Paul Seelig wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:38:19AM -0400, Joseph C. Tuttle wrote:
 
 I've heard this before, but I haven't been able to find WP 5.x on
 either of the two WP 8 CDs I have.
 
 It is only included in the retail server edition.  Check for yourself
 at http://linux.corel.com/products/wp8/features.htm;.

At that site it says:

  Corel WordPerfect 8 for Linux Character Terminal Binary
  for non-GUI terminal users

Note WordPerfect 8, not WordPerfect 5

Maybe this is indeed the good old WP5, but maybe it is simply
WP8 with all its disadvantages and none of its advantages ...

Ted.


E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 284 7749
Date: 01-Sep-00   Time: 18:29:07
-- XFMail --



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread David Karlin
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
 If I could get WP5 for UNIX up on Linux I'd run for it!

I did my share of editing in Wordperfect, too.

I suppose you could try running the old DOS version in dosemu.

(Don't know about licensing issues, though.)
-- 
David Karlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread I. Tura
Don't know about WP8 running under GNU/L, but if it converts and saves
WP5.1 documents with the same grace and style as WP8 for Windoze, no great
deal.

(Personal note: I was a fan of DOS WP5.1 and continued the useless trend
of upgrading until I got tired as I wanted some decent compatibility with
WP5.1, and now I write everything with HTML and thinking to 'upgrade' to
Latex).

Best to all,


Ignasi


On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:38:19AM -0400, Joseph C. Tuttle wrote:
 
 I've heard this before, but I haven't been able to find WP 5.x on either
of the 
 two WP 8 CDs I have.  I'd be happy to find it, though,  because I
believe the 
 DOS version of WP 5.1 was one of the best software products ever created.  
 So, if any of y'all know where it can be found exactly, please let me
know. 
 
It is only included in the retail server edition.  Check for yourself
at http://linux.corel.com/products/wp8/features.htm;.


-- 
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
/dev/null








 ---\
 From  Barcelona...  \   \\___
 /   / ___\_'_\
 Still nationalizing the LAN!   /\¬___/
 --/

___
Do You Yahoo!?
Achetez, vendez! À votre prix! Sur http://encheres.yahoo.fr



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 03:45:51PM -0600, David Karlin wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
  If I could get WP5 for UNIX up on Linux I'd run for it!
 
 I did my share of editing in Wordperfect, too.
 
 I suppose you could try running the old DOS version in dosemu.
 
 (Don't know about licensing issues, though.)

If you have a license for your copy, there should be no problem.  I ran
WP5 in dosemu for quite a while with no problems.  I have a copy of
Corel which includes WP8 and will take a look to see how to get the
text-based version working.  The manual doesn't appear to mention it.

-- 
Bob Nielsen, N7XY  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bainbridge Island, WA  http://www.oz.net/~nielsen
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-09-01 Thread Alec Smith
I would doubt there's a text-based version of WordPerfect 8 on any
platform... If there is, I'd love to know how to make it work. Until then,
I'll stick to WP 5.1/DOS for my work. In a decade of use its never
crashed or otherwise let me down. :)



On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Bob Nielsen wrote:

 On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 03:45:51PM -0600, David Karlin wrote:
  On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
   If I could get WP5 for UNIX up on Linux I'd run for it!
  
  I did my share of editing in Wordperfect, too.
  
  I suppose you could try running the old DOS version in dosemu.
  
  (Don't know about licensing issues, though.)
 
 If you have a license for your copy, there should be no problem.  I ran
 WP5 in dosemu for quite a while with no problems.  I have a copy of
 Corel which includes WP8 and will take a look to see how to get the
 text-based version working.  The manual doesn't appear to mention it.
 
 -- 
 Bob Nielsen, N7XY  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Bainbridge Island, WA  http://www.oz.net/~nielsen
  
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-30 Thread Will Trillich
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 07:10:57PM +0518, USM Bish wrote:
 A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.
 I am looking for a simple light weight console app 
 (non GUI) word processor,  something like the good
 old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
  
 Should be able to do formatting of text with  left 
 and right justification, setting of left and right 
 margins, text alignment (left, right and centre).  
 
 Preferentially should be able to save text in pure 
 ASCII.
 
 Additional features, if present, welcome.
 
 Anybody using one, or can guide me to any ?

as i recall, some folks around these parts are fond
of midnight commander (or `mc` for short) as a
file manager/text editor combo.

tip: when using 'mc' via remote access (ssh, for
example) you may not be able to get your keyboard
to send 'fkey' sequences properly. to get f10
you can do ESC-ZERO as a handy workaround...

i use vi (elvis) myself.



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread Nagarjuna G.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:


-  
- Should be able to do formatting of text with  left and right
- justification, setting of left and right margins, text alignment
- (left, right and centre).  

You can  do all this in emacs,  text-mode in emacs will  be just right
for you.  With a few key board macros defined while you work your way,
and abbrevs mode on for frequently  typed words, it will suit all your
requirements.  It will  also do spell-check by calling  ispell.  I use
only  emacs for  all  the regular  jobs,  and for  articles and  other
serious writing I use it to generate the LaTeX code.  And while typing
this text I have used many abbrevs that I have defined for the last 12
years.  This paragraph, e.g., is  justified on both sides.  The bottom
one is justified to the right.

  Emacs also has another mode called enriched text.  This is needed if
you want to print italics, bold and so on.

 Preferentially should be able to save text in pure ASCII.

Emacs saves in pure ASCII.

Learning curve is steep, but you will never repent.

Nagarjuna

--
Nagarjuna G; Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, TIFR, Mumbai. INDIA
--




Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread Paul Huygen
USM Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No, I'm actually looking for a word processor for small time
 jobs like letters and other odd things that I push out on my 
 DMP. This type of odd jobs actually occupies 60% of my time. 
 I am getting tired of switching to X for such small stuff.

I have to write many small letters too. However, contrary to general
opinions, I think that (Emacs and) LaTeX provides an at least as
efficient way to type letters than standard word processors or editors
do. The trick is, to make a style file
(e.g. mypersonalletterstyle.cls) that builds the letter including
header, head items, foot items, date, signature etc, and to make a
keyboard macro for the editor of choice that generates the following
frame for the letter, e.g.:

\documentclass{mypersonalletterstyle}
\begin{document}
\begin{letter}{*name and address of adressee*}

*text of the letter here*

\closing{*closing sentence here*}
\end{letter}
\end{document}

Then, all you have to do to create a beautyful letter, is 1) activate
the keyboard macro to generate the letter frame, 2) replace the parts
between the asterixes by the actual texts and 3) LaTeX and print
the letter.

Paul Huygen



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread kmself
No need to cc.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:10:11AM +0530, Nagarjuna G. wrote:
 On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:

 Learning curve is steep, but you will never repent.

My prefered version of this:  foo has a steep learning curve, but a
great payoff function.

substitute for foo:  emacs, linux, vi, etc.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.http://www.opensales.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?   Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0


pgpY8W9hW1miu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 28 Aug 2000, Paul Huygen wrote:
 USM Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  No, I'm actually looking for a word processor for small time
  jobs like letters and other odd things that I push out on my 
  DMP. This type of odd jobs actually occupies 60% of my time. 
  I am getting tired of switching to X for such small stuff.
 
 I have to write many small letters too. However, contrary to general
 opinions, I think that (Emacs and) LaTeX provides an at least as
 efficient way to type letters than standard word processors or editors
 do. The trick is, to make a style file
 (e.g. mypersonalletterstyle.cls) that builds the letter including
 header, head items, foot items, date, signature etc, and to make a
 keyboard macro for the editor of choice that generates the following
 frame for the letter, e.g.:
 
 \documentclass{mypersonalletterstyle}
 \begin{document}
 \begin{letter}{*name and address of adressee*}
 
 *text of the letter here*
 
 \closing{*closing sentence here*}
 \end{letter}
 \end{document}
 
 Then, all you have to do to create a beautyful letter, is 1) activate
 the keyboard macro to generate the letter frame, 2) replace the parts
 between the asterixes by the actual texts and 3) LaTeX and print
 the letter.
 
 Paul Huygen
 

I agree; I've done exactly this in vim.

Another possibility is to use pr.  You can set up an alias to produce
the format you like; I have:

alias pr=pr -f -l 57 -o 5

I also agree that dependence on word processors is unnecessary. When I
used DOS I had a WP I liked a lot called Protext. I missed it at first
in Linux (because it won't run in dosemu). However, now I used vim (with
latex when necesssary) and can reproduce all the features I used to like
in Protext, plus some others.



Anthony


-- 
Anthony Campbell - running Linux Debian 2.2 (Windows-free zone)
Book Reviews: http://www.cix.co.uk/~acampbell/bookreviews/
Skeptical articles: http://www.cix.co.uk/~acampbell/freethinker/

To be forced by desire into any unwarrantable belief is a calamity.
I.A. Richards



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread hawk
bish believed,

 Surely, LaTeX (and LyX) is definitely a class apart for do-
 ing real fancy documents,  but that's not the use that I am
 envisaging. I used LyX in the past as well (a good frontend 
 for LaTex for lazy bones)!

FYI, a console version of lyx is on its way--the current move is to 
toolkint independence, and someone is working on an ncurses version in 
this regard.  As I still need to resubscribe (again) to the developers' 
list, I can't tell you any more off the cuff.

hawk

-- 
Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.   Smeal 178(814) 375-4700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These opinions will not be those of Penn State until it pays my retainer.




Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread USM Bish
Wow ! That's news. Seems rather interesting. A console
based frontend to LaTeX ! 

If you cannot recall the URL, is there any clue to the
project/ program name so that one can search for it on 
one of the search engines on the net?

USM Bish

On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:27:43AM -0400, hawk wrote:
 bish believed,
 
  Surely, LaTeX (and LyX) is definitely a class apart for do-
  ing real fancy documents,  but that's not the use that I am
  envisaging. I used LyX in the past as well (a good frontend 
  for LaTex for lazy bones)!
 
 FYI, a console version of lyx is on its way--the current move is to 
 toolkint independence, and someone is working on an ncurses version in 
 this regard.  As I still need to resubscribe (again) to the developers' 
 list, I can't tell you any more off the cuff.
 
 hawk
 
 -- 
 Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.   Smeal 178(814) 375-4700
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 These opinions will not be those of Penn State until it pays my retainer.
 
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-28 Thread hawk
 Wow ! That's news. Seems rather interesting. A console
 based frontend to LaTeX ! 

 If you cannot recall the URL, is there any clue to the
 project/ program name so that one can search for it on 
 one of the search engines on the net?

It's www.lyx.org.  I don't remember who is working on it, but the 
ncurses version will eventually make it to he light of day.  There 
might even be an alpha-level port already; i don't know.

hawk



-- 
Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.   Smeal 178(814) 375-4700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These opinions will not be those of Penn State until it pays my retainer.




Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread USM Bish
A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.
I am looking for a simple light weight console app 
(non GUI) word processor,  something like the good
old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
 
Should be able to do formatting of text with  left 
and right justification, setting of left and right 
margins, text alignment (left, right and centre).  

Preferentially should be able to save text in pure 
ASCII.

Additional features, if present, welcome.

Anybody using one, or can guide me to any ?

USM Bish




Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread USM Bish
Grateful for your prompt reply.

No, I'm actually looking for a word processor for small time
jobs like letters and other odd things that I push out on my 
DMP. This type of odd jobs actually occupies 60% of my time. 
I am getting tired of switching to X for such small stuff.

The ASCII requirement is a personal fancy for portability to
other applications. Perhaps asking for the moon !  I know of
quite a few  DOS editors  capable of that inclusive of WS in
non-document mode.  Acorn view for the BBC used to do just
that.

vi editor is the thing that I am using at the moment for the
small time jobs, only that the finesse of proper page breaks 
and justification are missing.

Surely, LaTeX (and LyX) is definitely a class apart for do-
ing real fancy documents,  but that's not the use that I am
envisaging. I used LyX in the past as well (a good frontend 
for LaTex for lazy bones)! Of late I have switched to a new
wp called abiword ... does HTML, doc and RTF as well .. and
prints fine without any further processing. All these still
mean switching to X!

USM Bish

On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 09:09:53AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
 On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 07:10:57PM +0518, USM Bish wrote:
  A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.
  I am looking for a simple light weight console app 
  (non GUI) word processor,  something like the good
  old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
   
  Should be able to do formatting of text with  left 
  and right justification, setting of left and right 
  margins, text alignment (left, right and centre).  
  
  Preferentially should be able to save text in pure 
  ASCII.
 
 Would that be word processor as in not text editor?  Do you know
 about LaTeX?  Input files are created in a text editor (vi, jed, ...),
 passed to LaTeX which produces a .dvi file, and dvips produces a
 postscript file for ghostscript to send to the printer.  In X, you can
 view it before printing it with xdvi.
 
 This is what I use for prettified documents.  If you know programming,
 think of it as a programming language for documents.  It's very
 powerful, there's many good books describing how to use it, and it's
 well supported in the free software community.
 
 
 -- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen) TopQuark Software  Serv. Enquire within.
 [sed 's/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/@/g']   Contract programmer, server 
 bum.  
 Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread USM Bish
Got your point . I suppose  emacs is the way out if all
others fail. Though the concept in  Unix is text processing
as opposed to  word processing  popularised on smaller OSs,  
it is just possible there may be some in existance.

I did a search for console word processors in Linux through
various search engines. Not much joy. However, I do vaguely
remember seeing a  demo ncurses  based wp in a Yggdrasil CD
(Slackware distro) at a local vendor about three years ago.
Hav'nt seen anybody using it though.

USM Bish


On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 09:19:56AM -0700, Mathew Watson wrote:
 
 On 8/27/00 at 7:10 PM USM Bish wrote:
 
  A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.
  I am looking for a simple light weight console app 
  (non GUI) word processor,  something like the good
  old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
   
  Anybody using one, or can guide me to any ?
  
 
 This isn't quite what you're looking for, but it may produce the kind of
 text you want. ...
 
 Years ago I used nroff, a macro processor that was used to create UNIX man
 pages that displayed on TTY screens. I know debian has groff, a program
 similar to UNIX's troff, and it must have nroff too (or at least it's
 equivalent). Unfortunately creating your text this way is a two part
 process. First you edit your text in any non WYSIWYG editor, and then you
 run it through nroff to produce your text.
 
 Many Linux editors allow you to run programs like nroff on the contents of
 a buffer. In fact, I vaguely remember doing justification in emacs.
 Something like M-x format-region. I would definitely look through the emacs
 documentation, because what you are asking for seems, to me anyway, like
 what emacs should be able to do natively.
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Mat
 
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread Stephane Gaudreault
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, USM Bish wrote:
 A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.
 I am looking for a simple light weight console app 
 (non GUI) word processor,  something like the good
 old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
  
 Should be able to do formatting of text with  left 
 and right justification, setting of left and right 
 margins, text alignment (left, right and centre).  
 
 Preferentially should be able to save text in pure 
 ASCII.
 
 Additional features, if present, welcome.
 
 Anybody using one, or can guide me to any ?
 
 USM Bish

Try Latex !

Stéphane Gaudreault
Étudiant au B.Sc. spécialisé en informatique, 
Université de Montréal

«Le calcul est une expérience physique !»



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread John Anderson
The Cliq suite is available at www.quad.com, it offers not only
character-based word processing, but additional features such as a
spreadsheet, calendar, calculator and phone book.  You can download the
programs from their web site and ask for a temporary key to try it out.
A single user license is less than USD$ 23.00.


John Kerr Anderson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2   


On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, USM Bish wrote:

 A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.
 I am looking for a simple light weight console app 
 (non GUI) word processor,  something like the good
 old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
  
 Should be able to do formatting of text with  left 
 and right justification, setting of left and right 
 margins, text alignment (left, right and centre).  
 
 Preferentially should be able to save text in pure 
 ASCII.
 
 Additional features, if present, welcome.
 
 Anybody using one, or can guide me to any ?
 
 USM Bish
 
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread Morten Liebach
On 27, aug, 2000 at 10:00:48 +0518, USM Bish wrote:

snippage

 I did a search for console word processors in Linux through
 various search engines. Not much joy. However, I do vaguely
 remember seeing a  demo ncurses  based wp in a Yggdrasil CD
 (Slackware distro) at a local vendor about three years ago.
 Hav'nt seen anybody using it though.

I've just this last weekend heard about WordPerfect for UNIX in version
5.something being on the CD you could buy of WordPerfect 8!

It's _not_ included in the gratis download version, only the CD-edition.

I don't know if it is true, but the guy who told us sounded like he had
used it ...

My very first exprience with WordProcessing on a PC was on a 286 running
DOS and WP 5.1, I wrote a ~25 page physics paper on it, MAN it took it's
time to render a page filled with formulas when I wanted to use the
WYSIWYG feature!

On the positive side it was very pleasant to edit formulas in it ... I'm
becoming nostalgic now, but I think this might be the Perfect (pun
intended) solution for you, though it is an expensive one!

HTH
Morten

-- 
UNIX, reach out and grep someone!



Re: Console based Word Processor

2000-08-27 Thread kmself
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 07:10:57PM +0518, USM Bish wrote:
 A difficult thing to ask for in today's GUI world.  I am looking for a
 simple light weight console app (non GUI) word processor,  something
 like the good old WordStar (and such relics of yesteryears).
  
 Should be able to do formatting of text with  left and right
 justification, setting of left and right margins, text alignment
 (left, right and centre).  
 
 Preferentially should be able to save text in pure ASCII.
 
 Additional features, if present, welcome.
 
 Anybody using one, or can guide me to any ?
 
 USM Bish

WordPerfect 5.x/DOS runs under DOSEMU.  If you can find a copy, this
might suit your needs.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.http://www.opensales.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?   Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0


pgpOEF1uvIRpo.pgp
Description: PGP signature