[SOLVED] Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Aug 14, 2018, 2:30 PM by delop...@gmail.com: > > but why you don't run it in VM or VBox or extract, or use unetbootin? > Yes, eventually I installed unetbootin and got it working with it. Thanks to everyone who responded.
Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Le 14/08/2018 à 15:31, local10 a écrit : The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7 image, I need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a windows 7 image. What kind of Windows 7 image ? An installation DVD image ? AFAIK these ISO images are not hybrid and cannot boot from a SD card when written directly with dd or the like. You may have more luck with special tools such as Unetbootin or Rufus.
Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, local10 wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 08:44:26 > From: local10 > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition > table > Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:44:40 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > Am having issues trasfering iso file to an sd card using dd: > > # dd if=/tmp/winfile.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=1M conv=fsync > > dd completes successfully without any issues but when I try to mount the sd > card I can't (wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1) and > fdisk says "Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table". That's > kind of strange as I can mount and read /tmp/winfile.iso and it seems to be > in good order. > > Any ideas? Thanks > > > # fdisk -l /dev/sdb > ... > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0x > > Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table > > -- files and partitions are two different kinds of animal. 'm pretty certain if you run lsblk you will not find an entry for sdb1 or sdb2 on that disk either which means no valid partitions. Not only do you need to make a partition, you will also need to put a file system on it I'd recommend vfat for the windows stuff unless you normally use ntfs and have the necessary ntfs support utilities already on your system. Just don't loose that source file until after you got this done. Then mount -t vfat /dev/sdb1 /mnt/dvd would get you a mounted partition and a command like: cp filename /mnt/dvd as root or sudo would put that file in a partition with a file system on the drive you want. ls /mnt/dvd should show you the filename too once done.
Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
local10 wrote: > The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7 image, > I need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a windows 7 > image. is it live windows7 - I have heard rumors that such thing exists? Is it recovery disk? but why you don't run it in VM or VBox or extract, or use unetbootin? Still it is not clear what you want to do with that- well, obviously this thing with dd on sd card does not work. regards
Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
local10 (2018-08-14): > The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7 > image, I need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a > windows 7 image. Then I suspect you would have more luck asking people familiar with windows. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Aug 14, 2018, 8:47 AM by geo...@nsup.org: > > You can try to mount /dev/sdb itself. > Yes, you're right, I can mount it on /dev/sdb. > > But you are probably doing something wrong in the first place. What is your > > endgame? > The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7 image, I need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a windows 7 image. Thanks
Re: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
local10 (2018-08-14): > Am having issues trasfering iso file to an sd card using dd: > > # dd if=/tmp/winfile.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=1M conv=fsync > > dd completes successfully without any issues but when I try to mount > the sd card I can't (wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on > /dev/sdb1) and fdisk says "Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid > partition table". That's kind of strange as I can mount and read > /tmp/winfile.iso and it seems to be in good order. That is perfectly normal, an ISO file is an ISO-9660 filesystem image, it does not contain a MBR-style partition table. You can try to mount /dev/sdb itself. But you are probably doing something wrong in the first place. What is your endgame? Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature
ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Hi, Am having issues trasfering iso file to an sd card using dd: # dd if=/tmp/winfile.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=1M conv=fsync dd completes successfully without any issues but when I try to mount the sd card I can't (wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1) and fdisk says "Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table". That's kind of strange as I can mount and read /tmp/winfile.iso and it seems to be in good order. Any ideas? Thanks # fdisk -l /dev/sdb ... Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0000 Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Re: Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
hi, you should use de option n to create a new partition. Regards,Guillermo
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On 07/04/2014 11:58 AM, Guillermo Hernandez wrote: hi, you should use de option n to create a new partition. Regards, Guillermo The easiest partitioner I know of is gparted. You can download a bootable disk with gparted on it. * Perform actions with partitions such as: o create or delete o resize or move o check o label o set new UUID o copy and paste * Manipulate file systems such as: o btrfs o ext2 / ext3 / ext4 o fat16 / fat32 o hfs / hfs+ o linux-swap o lvm2 pv o nilfs2 o ntfs o reiserfs / reiser4 o ufs o xfs go to www.gparted.org to get more information. --doug
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
I once had an USB stick with a broken controller and couldn't partitioning it anymore. It was brand new, gets broken at the day when I used it the first time. It was warranted and I got another USB stick. Perhaps your drive isn't broken, but one cannot rule out the possibility that it's defect. I would test different USB slots and another, very short USB cable. Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/op.wkxcsvofqhadp0@suse11-2
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On Mi, 19 sep 12, 23:28:37, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Have a look in the syslog for any errors during the create. Make sure the drive has sufficient power. Try partitioning it from a different computer. You could also wipe the first few sectors with dd, maybe there's garbage there. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: lee wrote: There are some warnings when I tried to use fdisk to create a new empty DOS partition table. Do you know how to eliminate the warning? $fdisk -v fdisk (util-linux 2.20.1) $sudo fdisk /dev/sdb Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF disklabel Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x14879ac2. Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous content won't be recoverable. Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156372992 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149166 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x14879ac2 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System Command (m for help): m Command action a toggle a bootable flag b edit bsd disklabel c toggle the dos compatibility flag d delete a partition l list known partition types m print this menu n add a new partition o create a new empty DOS partition table p print the partition table q quit without saving changes s create a new empty Sun disklabel t change a partition's system id u change display/entry units v verify the partition table w write table to disk and exit x extra functionality (experts only) Command (m for help): o Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0xe3c60b5a. Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous content won't be recoverable. Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Command (m for help): w The partition table has been altered! Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table. Syncing disks. So, I wrote the partition table but the warning keeps coming back if I run fdisk again. $sudo fdisk /dev/sdb Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF disklabel Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x2c2ba04d. Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous content won't be recoverable. Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Command (m for help): q Now that's interesting. It looks like either the new partition you have been writing hasn't actually been written to the disk, or the kernel didn't realise that the partition table has changed. What do you mean reboot after creating partitions? This is an external hard drive that does not have any OS. So how can I reboot from it? Do you mean disconnect and reconnect? What I mean is reboot the computer (not boot from the new disk you're trying to partition, just reboot it normally). So: 1.) write the new partition table 2.) reboot the computer and run fdisk again and see if it still says the same If it still says the same, I'd try to connect the disk to an SATA port and try it again. If it still doesn't work, return it. Or don't go the lengths of connecting it to SATA and just return it ... 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. There is no Linux option. In gparted - Device - Create Partition Table - Advanced - Select new partition table type, the available choices are msdos, aix, amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, pc98, sun, loop Hmmm, I don't know --- I found I need to read up about partition table types and didn't get to do it yet. What I had in mind is the partition type code which applies to partitions and not to partition tables. -- Debian testing amd64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87boh1i6zh@yun.yagibdah.de
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 00:27 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Yes it is. Is there some output if you run # parted /dev/sdb mklabel msdos So, I did $sudo parted /dev/sdb GNU Parted 2.3 Using /dev/sdb Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) mklabel msdos (parted) quit Information: You may need to update /etc/fstab. Even after this, I get the following error if I go back to gparted and try to create a new partition. $sudo gparted /dev/sdb == libparted : 2.3 == /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label I also upgraded to the latest kernel but that did not solve much. $uname -a Linux kusumanchi.mae.cornell.edu 3.2.0-3-686-pae #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 03:50:34 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k3e1su$1jm$1...@ger.gmane.org
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
lee wrote: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: I am trying to parition a new Western Digital WD Scorpio Black 750 GB SATA 3 GB/s 7200 RPM 16 MB Cache Internal Bulk/OEM 2.5-Inch Mobile Hard Drive but with no success. $sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156372992 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149166 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table That is to be expected for a new disk. IIRC, fdisk (or was that cfdisk?) has an option to start over with an empty partition table. Depending on which version of fdisk you have, there are options you can use to turn off msdos compatibility and to turn on something else --- I don't remember what these options were, and my version of fdisk doesn't have them anymore (fdisk -n or fdisk -nc maybe?), so I forgot about them. There are some warnings when I tried to use fdisk to create a new empty DOS partition table. Do you know how to eliminate the warning? $fdisk -v fdisk (util-linux 2.20.1) $sudo fdisk /dev/sdb Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF disklabel Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x14879ac2. Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous content won't be recoverable. Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156372992 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149166 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x14879ac2 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System Command (m for help): m Command action a toggle a bootable flag b edit bsd disklabel c toggle the dos compatibility flag d delete a partition l list known partition types m print this menu n add a new partition o create a new empty DOS partition table p print the partition table q quit without saving changes s create a new empty Sun disklabel t change a partition's system id u change display/entry units v verify the partition table w write table to disk and exit x extra functionality (experts only) Command (m for help): o Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0xe3c60b5a. Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous content won't be recoverable. Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Command (m for help): w The partition table has been altered! Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table. Syncing disks. So, I wrote the partition table but the warning keeps coming back if I run fdisk again. $sudo fdisk /dev/sdb Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF disklabel Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x2c2ba04d. Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous content won't be recoverable. Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite) Command (m for help): q Anyway, make a new empty partition table and create a partition and see if you can write that to disk. Always reboot after creating partitions; I've seen it going wrong when not rebooting and only re-reading partition tables. What do you mean reboot after creating partitions? This is an external hard drive that does not have any OS. So how can I reboot from it? Do you mean disconnect and reconnect? 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. There is no Linux option. In gparted - Device - Create Partition Table - Advanced - Select new partition table type, the available choices are msdos, aix, amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, pc98, sun, loop thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k3e2lo$6dv$1...@ger.gmane.org
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: I am trying to parition a new Western Digital WD Scorpio Black 750 GB SATA 3 GB/s 7200 RPM 16 MB Cache Internal Bulk/OEM 2.5-Inch Mobile Hard Drive but with no success. $sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156372992 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149166 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table That is to be expected for a new disk. IIRC, fdisk (or was that cfdisk?) has an option to start over with an empty partition table. Depending on which version of fdisk you have, there are options you can use to turn off msdos compatibility and to turn on something else --- I don't remember what these options were, and my version of fdisk doesn't have them anymore (fdisk -n or fdisk -nc maybe?), so I forgot about them. Anyway, make a new empty partition table and create a partition and see if you can write that to disk. Always reboot after creating partitions; I've seen it going wrong when not rebooting and only re-reading partition tables. 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. 3) Here I connected the hard drive via a USB connection. Could that be a problem? Should I connect the drive directly via SATA cable in order to partition? You should be able to partition it while it's connected to an USB port. However, there are some operations not supported with USB, so if everything else fails, connecting the disk to an SATA port might help. -- Debian testing amd64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obl3tfaa@yun.yagibdah.de
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote: 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. Partition *table*, not *type* ;) Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes: On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote: 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. Partition *table*, not *type* ;) Are you sure there is such a thing as an msdos partition table? There seem to be a couple types of partition tables, and msdos doesn't seem to be amongst them[1]. Then there are partition types and partition type codes, see [2]. The OP probably refers to the partition type code, more commonly referred to as partition type. IIRC fdisk does that. If it does, perhaps we should file a bug against fdisk to have that changed to partition type code? [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_table [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partition -- Debian testing amd64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87392fqa0e@yun.yagibdah.de
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes: On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote: 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. Partition *table*, not *type* ;) Are you sure there is such a thing as an msdos partition table? There seem to be a couple types of partition tables, and msdos doesn't seem to be amongst them[1]. Then there are partition types and partition type codes, see [2]. The OP probably refers to the partition type code, more commonly referred to as partition type. IIRC fdisk does that. If it does, perhaps we should file a bug against fdisk to have that changed to partition type code? d-i refers to an msdos partition table. fdisk refers to a dos partition table. You can choose from a few different partition tables in d-i. The only other that I remember, that I've used, and that I prefer is gpt. In fdisk, you can only choose dos (you can also choose a bsd label but I think that it's in addition to dos but might be wrong...). In gdisk, you can choose gpt. AFAIK, there are more options in parted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxxydjz0kz8+tpsxoicub_offgk-6zbawfakhak0uu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On 9/18/2012 4:46 PM, lee wrote: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes: On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote: 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it works, you can try to change it to msdos. Partition *table*, not *type* ;) Are you sure there is such a thing as an msdos partition table? There seem to be a couple types of partition tables, and msdos doesn't seem to be amongst them[1]. Then there are partition types and partition type codes, see [2]. The OP probably refers to the partition type code, more commonly referred to as partition type. IIRC fdisk does that. If it does, perhaps we should file a bug against fdisk to have that changed to partition type code? [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_table [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partition There is confusion here between partition table type and partition type. The partition table holds information about the different partitions. An msdos partition *table* can hold a linux partition. Use msdos, gpt, or nothing: LVM over a physical volume, for a partition *table* type. gpt has the advantage over msdos (or just 'dos') that it supports partitions over 2TB in size. Use linux for partitition type if you don't go for LVM. Step one: INitialize the disk with a partition table. Step two: Add some partitions. At least one partition for the system (root---/), and probably a small one for swap. Maybe a separate one for /boot, maybe a separate one for /home. (I use LVM, so to keep things simple, I put LVM logical volumes inside a partition (rather than on a bare disk), and put /boot on an 8GB separate partition.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50591462.2000...@allums.com
Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
I am trying to parition a new Western Digital WD Scorpio Black 750 GB SATA 3 GB/s 7200 RPM 16 MB Cache Internal Bulk/OEM 2.5-Inch Mobile Hard Drive but with no success. $sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156372992 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149166 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table When I tried gparted, it gives the following error $sudo gparted /dev/sdb == libparted : 2.3 == /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label In particular, I tried gparted - Device - Create Parition Table - I chose msdos as the new partition table type - Apply After a minute or so, it prints /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label on the command line. 1) What am I doing wrong? 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? 3) Here I connected the hard drive via a USB connection. Could that be a problem? Should I connect the drive directly via SATA cable in order to partition? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k38tdf$ibf$1...@ger.gmane.org
Re: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 00:27 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label 2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive? Yes it is. Is there some output if you run # parted /dev/sdb mklabel msdos ? Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1347945779.1112.41.camel@localhost.localdomain
